Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Iranian dissidents seize on Trump remarks about armed resistance, fueling revival of Reagan doctrine

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

After President Donald Trump suggested this week that Iranians «would fight back» if they had weapons, Iranian dissidents, military analysts and some Republican lawmakers are openly reviving a once-taboo question: should the West move beyond «maximum pressure» on Tehran and actively support armed resistance inside Iran?

Advertisement

«They have to have guns. And I think they’re getting some guns. As soon as they have guns, they’ll fight like, as good as anybody there is,» Trump said in an interview with «The Hugh Hewitt Show,» while discussing anti-regime unrest and the Iranian government’s crackdown on protesters.

The comments come as the Iranian regime emerges weakened from weeks of war, while frustration continues to simmer among many Iranians after years of failed protests and violent crackdowns by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

LINDSEY GRAHAM URGES US, ISRAEL TO ARM IRANIAN CIVILIANS IN ‘SECOND AMENDMENT SOLUTION’ TO TOPPLE REGIME

Advertisement

Protesters rally in Washington, D.C., on March 7, 2026, supporting regime change in Iran following U.S. and Israeli strikes that killed Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

Supporters of a more aggressive approach argue sanctions, diplomacy and unarmed demonstrations have failed to produce meaningful change inside Iran and say the current moment may represent the best opportunity in decades to challenge the regime from within. Critics warn that openly discussing armed resistance could endanger protesters, deepen divisions inside the opposition and risk pushing Iran toward civil war.

The idea of armed resistance echoes aspects of the Reagan Doctrine, the Cold War-era strategy in which the U.S. backed anti-Soviet resistance movements around the world, from Afghanistan to Nicaragua.

Advertisement

«We need to give Iranians the tools now, and they’ll finish the job themselves,» Brett Velicovich, founder of Powerus and a former U.S. military and intelligence specialist focused on drone warfare, told Fox News Digital.

«It’s their time to do something. There has never been a better chance.»

AS AIRSTRIKES RAIN DOWN ON THE IRANIAN REGIME, CAN A FRACTURED OPPOSITION UNITE TO LEAD IF IT FALLS?

Advertisement
Smoke and flames rising from an oil depot after airstrikes in Tehran

Smoke and flames rise at an oil depot in Tehran after airstrikes on March 7, 2026. The United States and Israel launched strikes against Iran on Feb. 28, leading to Iranian missile retaliation and increased concerns about global energy and transport disruption. (Sasan/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Velicovich described the strategy as «Reagan Doctrine 2.0,» updated for the age of drones and decentralized warfare.

«Cheap FPV drones, loitering munitions, and small arms let motivated fighters turn Iran’s streets and mountains into a nightmare for the IRGC,» he said. «This isn’t fantasy; it’s asymmetric warfare that works.»

He argued that modern drone technology has fundamentally changed the balance between governments and insurgent or resistance movements.

Advertisement

«Drones democratize power,» Velicovich said. «The regime’s monopoly on violence ends the day the people get eyes in the sky and precision strike capability.»

IRANIAN KURDISH FIGHTERS SAY THEY’RE READY TO STRIKE TEHRAN, WAITING FOR OPENING

Iran drones

Iran is building a decentralized FPV drone capability in basement factories using Chinese parts, defense expert Cameron Chell warns, citing a potential threat to the U.S. homeland. (Getty)

Still, even some critics of the Iranian regime caution that the comparison to Cold War proxy movements has limits.

Advertisement

Unlike Soviet-controlled Eastern Europe or Afghanistan in the 1980s, Iran is a highly nationalistic country with a fragmented opposition and deep fears of foreign intervention following decades of conflict across the Middle East.

Still, calls for more direct support for anti-regime forces are increasingly moving into mainstream Republican foreign policy discussions.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., recently called for what he described as a «Second Amendment solution» inside Iran.

Advertisement

«If I were President Trump and I were Israel, I would load the Iranian people up with weapons so they could go to the streets armed and turn the tide of battle inside Iran,» Graham said on «Hannity.»

The question of who would actually receive support, however, remains deeply controversial.

Reza Pahlavi speaking at the 2023 Women’s Forum in Washington, D.C.

Exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi speaks at the Women’s Forum hosted by Vital Voices in Washington, D.C., on March 29, 2023. (Paul Morigi/Getty Images)

Some opposition supporters continue to rally around exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, whose name has surfaced during anti-regime protests inside Iran and who has urged the international community not to give Tehran «another lifeline.»

Advertisement

Another group that has acted in various operations against the regime is the controversial People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran, or MEK, which has long positioned itself as an organized opposition force against the Islamic Republic. The MEK recently posted videos showing its members targeting «regime centers and symbols of crime and repression,» in response to the execution of two of its members last month — Hamed Validi and Mohammad (Nima) Massoum-Shahi.

Others point to existing armed or semi-organized anti-regime groups, including Kurdish organizations, Baloch insurgent networks and underground resistance cells operating inside Iran.

Sardar Pashaei, director of the Hiwa Foundation and a former Iranian wrestling champion now living in the United States, warned that publicly discussing arming protesters could itself put lives at risk.

Advertisement

«I think we must be extremely cautious on this issue, especially publicly, because the regime can use it as a pretext to arrest protesters, fabricate cases and even justify executions,» Pashaei told Fox News Digital.

IRAN’S INTERNET BLACKOUT HIDING STRIKE DAMAGE AND SUPPRESSING DISSENT, ISRAELI OFFICIALS SAY

A woman walking across a nearly empty public square with a large billboard of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the background

A woman walks across a nearly empty public square in Tehran, Iran, with a large billboard displaying the portrait of the late supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in the background on March 3, 2026. (Vahid Salemi/AP Photo)

«For decades, the Islamic Republic has used accusations of ties to the United States, Israel, or espionage to target dissidents and political prisoners.»

Advertisement

Pashaei argued the better approach is supporting Iranian civil society, restoring internet access and backing democratic opposition groups that reflect Iran’s ethnic and political diversity.

The issue became even more sensitive after Trump said during a phone interview with «Fox News Sunday» in early April that his administration had previously attempted to send firearms to Iranian protesters through Kurdish channels, though the effort failed.

IRAN REGIME FACES ‘BEGINNING OF THE END’ AS EXILED CROWN PRINCE SEES ‘GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY’

Advertisement
Men and women holding Kurdish scarves and roses during Nowruz festivities in Saqqez, Iran

Men and women hold Kurdish scarves and roses during Nowruz festivities in Saqqez, Iran, on March 15, 2024. (Barbod Khorshidi/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

«We sent guns to the protesters, a lot of them. We sent them through the Kurds. And I think the Kurds took the guns,» Trump said.

Several Kurdish groups have denied receiving such shipments.

Pashaei warned that claims of foreign weapons support could deepen divisions inside the opposition while also exposing Kurdish groups to further retaliation from Tehran.

Advertisement

«During the so-called ceasefire period, Kurdish opposition groups were targeted more than 30 times with drone and missile attacks,» he said, adding that four young Kurdish Peshmerga fighters were killed, including 19-year-old Ghazal Mowlan.

Burning cars line a street in Tehran as thick smoke rises during unrest.

Cars burn in a street during a protest over the collapse of the currency’s value in Tehran, Iran, Jan. 8, 2026. (Stringer/West Asia News Agency via Reuters)

One source familiar with discussions surrounding Iranian opposition strategy said supporters of a more aggressive approach increasingly believe the current moment presents a rare opportunity to identify, train and support local resistance networks capable of protecting protesters and challenging the regime from within.

The source argued that while Iran spent decades building and cultivating proxy networks across the Middle East, Western governments largely avoided investing in organized anti-regime infrastructure inside Iran itself.

Advertisement

Others warn that empowering armed factions could trigger ethnic fragmentation, civil war or a Syria-style conflict inside Iran.

According to the source, supporters of a more aggressive approach increasingly believe the current moment presents a rare opportunity to identify, train and support local resistance networks capable of protecting protesters and challenging the regime from within.

Whether Washington is willing to move beyond pressure campaigns and sanctions toward something closer to a modernized Reagan Doctrine remains unclear.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Members of security forces watching over a crowd during a funeral procession in Tehran

Members of security forces watch over the crowd during a funeral procession for IRGC Navy Chief Alireza Tangsiri and other senior naval commanders killed in U.S.-Israeli strikes in Tehran, Iran, on April 1, 2026. (Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

For now, Trump’s comments have pushed a once-theoretical conversation into the open, while some argue the current moment may represent the best opportunity in decades to challenge the regime.

Advertisement



war with iran, world protests, defense, drones, iran, sanctions

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Polonia denunció que un misil de crucero ruso violó su espacio aéreo durante un ataque de Moscú contra Ucrania

Published

on


La policía confirmó el hallazgo de un cráter de 10 metros de ancho y restos dispersos de un objeto no identificado a unos dos kilómetros de las viviendas más cercanas

Un misil de crucero ruso penetró el espacio aéreo de Polonia en la madrugada de este jueves durante un ataque a gran escala contra Ucrania, e impactó en un campo en la provincia de Lublin, a unos 90 kilómetros de la frontera ucraniana, en lo que el primer ministro Donald Tusk calificó como “una violación del espacio aéreo polaco” y un “incidente grave”.

Advertisement

El objeto, detectado por radares militares a las 3:40 de la madrugada en dirección oeste, desapareció de las pantallas seis minutos después, antes de que un caza F-16 enviado a identificarlo pudiera establecer contacto visual.

Un helicóptero Mi-24 fue desplegado posteriormente y localizó el probable punto de impacto en una zona sin urbanizar entre las aldeas de Tarnawa Kolonia y Tokary.

La policía confirmó el hallazgo de un cráter de 10 metros de ancho y restos dispersos de un objeto no identificado a unos dos kilómetros de las viviendas más cercanas. No se registraron víctimas ni daños en edificios.

Advertisement

El canciller ucraniano, Andrii Sybiha, fue el primero en señalar públicamente la naturaleza del objeto. “Durante la noche, un misil de crucero ruso Kh-101 cruzó al espacio aéreo polaco como parte del ataque masivo de Rusia contra Ucrania, violando el espacio aéreo de la Organización del Tratado del Atlántico Norte (OTAN)“, escribió en X.

Bomberos y policías trabajan en el lugar donde un misil ruso cayó tras violar el espacio aéreo polaco en un campo cerca de la aldea de Tarnawa Kolonia, cerca de Lublin, Polonia, el 30 de julio de 2026 (Jakub Orzechowski/Agencia Wyborcza.pl/via REUTERS)
Bomberos y policías trabajan en el lugar donde un misil ruso cayó tras violar el espacio aéreo polaco en un campo cerca de la aldea de Tarnawa Kolonia, cerca de Lublin, Polonia, el 30 de julio de 2026 (Jakub Orzechowski/Agencia Wyborcza.pl/via REUTERS)

Tusk, más cauteloso, indicó que “todo apunta” a que se trata de ese tipo de misil, pero aclaró que esperará los resultados de la investigación antes de hacer una confirmación oficial. Polonia no ha atribuido formalmente el objeto al arsenal ruso.

El ataque nocturno contra Ucrania fue uno de los más intensos del conflicto: según el Ejército ucraniano, Rusia lanzó 74 misiles —nueve de ellos balísticos— y 284 drones. Seis misiles balísticos, dos de crucero y 17 drones no fueron interceptados e impactaron en distintos objetivos. Las regiones de Leópolis, limítrofe con Polonia, y Dnipropetrovsk fueron las más afectadas. En esta última, un misil balístico destruyó una vivienda y mató a al menos ocho personas, entre ellas tres menores y sus padres, según informaron las autoridades ucranianas y recogió la agencia AP.

Tusk convocó de urgencia una reunión de seguridad con altos mandos del Ministerio de Defensa y se trasladó personalmente al lugar del impacto junto con el ministro de Defensa, Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz.

Advertisement

Son solo metros lo que nos separa de esa guerra. Esta noche una vez más nos recuerda a todos que la situación es muy grave y representa una amenaza”, declaró Kosiniak-Kamysz.

El primer ministro subrayó que las fuerzas polacas estaban en condiciones de derribar el proyectil si este hubiera continuado su trayectoria hacia el interior del territorio nacional, y precisó que el Ejército, la Policía y los servicios de inteligencia actuaron “rápida y eficazmente”.

Agentes en el lugar donde cayó el misil (REUTERS/Kuba Stezycki)
Agentes en el lugar donde cayó el misil (REUTERS/Kuba Stezycki)

El presidente del Consejo Europeo, Antonio Costa, confirmó también la violación del espacio aéreo polaco, según informaron Reuters y AP. Tusk señaló que mantuvo contacto con líderes europeos, todos los cuales expresaron “plena solidaridad” con Varsovia. La fiscalía militar polaca abrió una investigación para determinar con exactitud qué tipo de objeto cayó en la provincia de Lublin.

Sybiha aprovechó el incidente para reclamar un refuerzo urgente de la defensa aérea de Ucrania y para pedir una distensión en las relaciones con Polonia, tensas por los homenajes ucranianos a figuras históricas vinculadas a matanzas de polacos durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial. “Reforzar la defensa aérea de Ucrania ahora es urgente y sirve como garantía de protección para toda la comunidad euroatlántica”, sostuvo el canciller ucraniano en declaraciones recogidas por Reuters.

Advertisement

El incidente en territorio polaco se produjo días después de que Rumania derribara por primera vez drones rusos sobre su propio suelo, un episodio que también encendió las alarmas entre los miembros orientales de la OTAN sobre la extensión del conflicto más allá de las fronteras ucranianas.



agresja rosji,atak rakietowy,atak rosji,defence,dron,drony,eksplozja,krater,lej,miejsce eksplozji,naruszenie polskiej przestrzeni powietrznej,policja,policjanci,policjant,praca sluzb,przestrzen powietrzna,radiowoz,radiowoz policyjny,rakieta,rosja,rosyjska rakieta,sluzby,sluzby mundurowe,tarnawa kolonia,ukraina,upadek rakiety,wojna,wojna w ukrainie,wybuch,zmasowany atak rosji

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

LA real estate vet comes at Mayor Bass with receipts over damning homelessness report: ‘She doesn’t get it’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

LOS ANGELES, CA – As new data show homelessness rising in Los Angeles, local activist John Alle said Mayor Karen Bass has neglected her responsibility to address the issue and witness firsthand the crime, drug use and deteriorating conditions in some of the city’s hardest-hit neighborhoods.

Advertisement

The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority released its 2026 annual homeless count Friday, finding overall homelessness increased 3.4% in LA and 1.2% across the Los Angeles Continuum of Care following two consecutive years of declines, though LAHSA said «neither change is considered statistically significant.»

The count estimated 45,194 people were experiencing homelessness in LA and 73,040 across the Continuum of Care, which excludes Long Beach, Pasadena and Glendale.

«She doesn’t get it. She doesn’t see it,» John Alle, a Santa Monica business owner and co-founder of the Santa Monica Coalition who owns properties across Los Angeles, told Fox News Digital in an interview last month.

Advertisement

KAREN BASS GRILLED OVER BROKEN HOMELESSNESS PROMISE, BLAMES BUREAUCRACY FOR SLOWED PROGRESS

John Alle, a Santa Monica business owner and co-founder of the Santa Monica Coalition, blasted Mayor Karen Bass’ response to homelessness as new data show the crisis is worsening in Los Angeles. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images ; Eric Thayer / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

«We’ve invited her numerous times to ride along with us through Alvarado, Third Street, Park View, MacArthur Park and Westlake. Come drive with us. Have a police officer follow behind for security. And she refused.»

Advertisement

The report also found street homelessness rose 7.9% in Los Angeles and 3.3% countywide, with an estimated 29,115 people living on the streets in the city. LAHSA said funding cuts affecting Time-Limited Subsidies and other economic factors reduced the number of people permanently housed by about 5,100 from the «record high of 28,625 people housed permanently in 2024.»

In a press release Thursday responding to the data, Bass argued funding cuts «at the federal and state levels» contributed to the rise, adding the Trump administration had «driven up the cost of gas, groceries, and rent — pushing more families to the edge — and slashed critical safety net funding.»

«For two years straight, we drove down homelessness by historic margins — but as expected, last year our efforts ultimately couldn’t keep up with policies and funding cuts at the federal and state levels that pushed more people onto the streets,» she said.

Advertisement

Bass also admitted in a May interview with CNN’s Elex Michaelson that she did not fulfill her promise to end street homelessness in the city by 2026 because she «didn’t anticipate some of the bureaucratic barriers» her administration would face.

Alle said crime has «gotten so bad» in neighborhoods including Little Bangladesh, which Bass has previously described as one of «LA’s most vibrant communities.»

«In Little Bangladesh, the crime is so bad that we’re finding people on the streets unconscious,» he said. «We’re having handymen pick up needles and dispose of them.»

Advertisement

SPENCER PRATT SAYS HIS POLICY WILL FORCE HOMELESS OUT OF LA AND INTO CITIES LIKE SEATTLE

Los Angles Mayor Karen Bass

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass prepares to leave the scene where city workers clear a large homeless encampment behind a public storage facility along the San Diego (405) Freeway at the end of Oxnard Street in Van Nuys on July 31, 2025 (Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Pointing to his tenants’ experiences, Alle said he sees the impact of the crisis every day on the «mom-and-pop» renters who live in his apartment buildings and pay thousands of dollars a month, saying «it doesn’t sit well with me.»

«From people overdosing outside the gated apartment buildings I own, to people attacking each other, murders, and calling 911 only to be put on hold for sometimes an hour, and then being told, ‘Well, you’re lucky. Sometimes it’s two hours,’» he said.

Advertisement

Alle accused Bass of ignoring neighborhood conditions despite living nearby at Getty House, the mayor’s official residence in Windsor Square.

«The streetlights are out,» he said. «The rubbish isn’t collected. The streets are dirty. It’s one thing to complain about copper wire theft, but we’re just talking about normal streetlights and replacing the bulbs.»

But it’s not just residents who are affected, according to Alle, who said small businesses are being forced to close early to avoid crime and making it harder to stay in the city.

Advertisement

«When I see them having to leave work at four o’clock, I see them having to close their businesses at four o’clock during the winter and at dusk during the summer,» he said. «That’s not good. I want them to succeed. If they don’t succeed, they can’t afford to stay in LA I feel for them, and their problems are my problems.»

HOUSING FIRST IS A DISASTER. I SAW SACRAMENTO’S HOMELESS CHAOS FIRSTHAND

A homeless encampment near Venice Beach in Los Angeles

A homeless encampment near Venice Beach in Los Angeles. Residents have called for stronger oversight of nearby supportive housing programs and improved public safety. (Jill Connelly/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Multiple studies have found that a large portion of homeless individuals in Los Angeles County aren’t originally from there and Alle has been vocal about how his coalition partnered with an artificial intelligence company to create an AI-powered hotline that has helped more than 40 homeless people return to their home states over the past year.

Advertisement

«They’ve called us from shelters,» he said. «They’ve called us from parks. The people calling aren’t entrenched with the drugs or the gangs. They came here for noble reasons.»

Additionally, Alle said his coalition collaborates with local law enforcement, paying for bus, plane or train tickets to help homeless people voluntarily return home, where they can reunite with family or enter treatment programs.

«We’re not gonna put them behind the slammer,» he said.

Advertisement

Alle said the most «heartbreaking» part is watching families embrace loved ones returning home, with many looking «completely different» after recovery.

«It’s a long road ahead, but they’re trying because they’ve seen hell in LA,» he said.

While acknowledging the program won’t end all homelessness, Alle said helping even a small number of people rebuild their lives is a victory.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«One person saved is great. Fifteen percent, and the 40 people we’ve saved, is tremendous,» he said.

Bass will face off against progressive city councilwoman Nithya Raman, who has her own ties to the homeless crisis as chair of the Los Angeles City Council’s Housing and Homelessness Committee, in her bid to win another term as mayor in November.

Advertisement

homeless crisis, los angeles, housing, blue city crime, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

«Un buen día, Paraguay decidió invadir Brasil»: la frase de Lula que generó repudio en el Parlamento paraguayo

Published

on



En medio del conflicto diplomático entre los gobiernos de Argentina y Brasil, el Parlamento paraguayo salió a repudiar una frase de Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva sobre la Guerra de la Triple Alianza. «No olvidemos que, un buen día, Paraguay decidió invadir Brasil», dijo el presidente brasileño para justificar un aumento de la inversión en defensa.

El acto en el que Lula pronunció su frase ocurrió el viernes, poco antes de que estallara el conflicto con Javier Milei. Este miércoles, el Senado y la Cámara de Diputados de Paraguay expresaron su repudio a las declaraciones de Lula. Lo acusaron de «distorsionar» la historia.

Advertisement

En una sesión extraordinaria, la Cámara alta aprobó una declaración para «repudiar enérgicamente» las expresiones de Lula, quien aseguró el viernes pasado, durante una visita a una fábrica de la empresa de defensa Avibras Aeroco, que a su país le gusta la paz, pero que no pueden «olvidar que, un buen día, Paraguay decidió invadir Brasil», y luego lo hizo en Argentina y Uruguay.

Los senadores exhortaron a las autoridades brasileñas a tener «un tratamiento respetuoso, equilibrado y veraz de la historia compartida, en aras de fortalecer las relaciones bilaterales», al tiempo que destacaron que Paraguay es «uno de los países más pacíficos de América del Sur» y que «no representa amenaza alguna a la soberanía ni a la integridad territorial del Brasil».


Según el texto, propuesto por el senador opositor Eduardo Nakayama, los dichos de Lula «distorsionan y simplifican unilateralmente el origen de la Guerra de la Triple Alianza», en la que su país se enfrentó contra Brasil, Argentina y Uruguay, y atribuyen a Paraguay «la condición de agresor exclusivo», omitiendo la invasión del Imperio brasileño a Uruguay.

Advertisement

Las consecuencias para Paraguay de la también conocida como Guerra Grande fueron «catastróficas e incomparables en la historia de América del Sur», subrayó la declaración, al señalar que el país perdió entre el 50 y 60 % de su población, provocó «devastación económica, productiva del país, la ocupación militar prolongada, el saqueo y la imposición de deudas de guerra».


«Esta herida permanece abierta en la memoria colectiva del pueblo paraguayo, y se agrava por actitudes y declaraciones» como las de Lula, añadió el documento.

Advertisement


Durante el debate, el senador opositor Rafael Filizzola dijo que le resulta «indignante» el «banalizar una guerra como esta», al tiempo que lamentó que la Cancillería paraguaya no haya emitido un reclamo oficial.


«El presidente Lula tiene derecho a defender la seguridad de su país, pero no tiene derecho a usar la tragedia paraguaya para justificar armas», expresó el también opositor Ignacio Iramain.


Por otro lado, la declaración de la Cámara de Diputados, también aprobada por mayoría y cuyo texto final se difundió este miércoles, «repudia» las expresiones de Lula «por distorsionar y minimizar la dimensión» de este conflicto bélico, considerado el más cruento de Suramérica.

Advertisement

La resolución, que fue enviada al presidente paraguayo, Santiago Peña, también exhorta al Ejecutivo a «impulsar las gestiones diplomáticas para la restitución» de los trofeos de guerra, como «expresión de justicia histórica».

Uno de los trofeos mencionados es el Cañón Cristiano, una pieza de artillería elaborada en 1866 por Paraguay con el bronce fundido de las campanas entregadas por el pueblo para defender al país en medio de la guerra y que permanece actualmente en el Museo Histórico Nacional de Río de Janeiro.

Advertisement


Los diputados además instaron a que los hechos históricos que han marcado «profundamente» a los pueblos «sean abordados siempre con sensibilidad, responsabilidad histórica y espíritu de reconciliación, honrando la verdad, la memoria de las víctimas y el principio del derecho internacional».

Las declaraciones de Lula causaron indignación entre diversos sectores paraguayos, mientras que el Gobierno ha enfrentado duras críticas ante lo que ha sido calificado como un «silencio» diplomático.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias