Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

La «velocidad ridícula» de los misiles rusos que Ucrania no puede detener y que son un dolor de cabeza para Zelenski

Published

on


Cuando Rusia dispara un misil balístico contra Ucrania, los sistemas de defensa antiaérea tienen solo minutos —a veces segundos— para detectar e interceptar la amenaza mortal.

La falta de tiempo ha dejado a Kiev y a otras ciudades cada vez más expuestas a ataques devastadores de misiles que descienden tan rápido y con una trayectoria tan pronunciada que, según Ucrania, solo el sistema de defensa Patriot de fabricación estadounidense puede detenerlos. Pero Ucrania afirma que tiene muy pocas baterías e interceptores para protegerse.

Advertisement

A diferencia de los misiles crucero, que se comportan como aviones sin piloto, los misiles balísticos se lanzan como cohetes y luego se precipitan en picado hacia sus objetivos a varias veces la velocidad del sonido.

Eso reduce drásticamente el tiempo disponible para localizar y destruir una ojiva.

Cuando la ojiva es lanzada hacia su objetivo, “la trayectoria es muy, muy pronunciada y va a una velocidad ridícula”, explicó Thomas Withington, experto en guerra electrónica del Royal United Services Institute, quien comparó la física con jugar a atrapar una pelota. Si la pelota “va realmente rápido, es más difícil atraparla”.

Advertisement

El misil Iskander-M, lanzado desde tierra, es el principal misil balístico del Kremlin. Otro ejemplo es el misil Kinzhal, lanzado desde el aire. Rusia también ha disparado misiles de defensa antiaérea S-300 y S-400 contra objetivos terrestres. Un modelo conocido como Zircon es técnicamente un misil crucero hipersónico antibuque, pero su alta velocidad se asemeja a la de un misil balístico y crea un problema de intercepción similar.

El sistema Patriot ofrece cierta protección

El sistema Patriot más capaz suministrado a Ucrania está diseñado para la defensa contra misiles de alta velocidad. En lugar de explotar cerca de un objetivo, el sistema PAC-3 utiliza un interceptor maniobrable diseñado para colisionar con una ojiva entrante. La tecnología Patriot debe rastrear el misil, predecir su trayectoria y lanzar en cuestión de minutos, a veces dejando segundos para el enfrentamiento final.

Advertisement

Los Patriot son actualmente el único sistema en servicio en Ucrania capaz de interceptar los misiles rusos Iskander-M, S-400 y Zircon, según el portavoz de la Fuerza Aérea ucraniana, Yurii Ihnat. Estados Unidos y sus aliados operan otros sistemas antibalísticos, incluidos THAAD y las defensas Aegis basadas en el mar, pero no se han proporcionado a Ucrania.

Ni siquiera la protección Patriot está garantizada. Cuando una batería Patriot está ausente, fuera de posición o escasa de misiles, la mayoría de las otras defensas ucranianas no pueden sustituirla.

Ucrania tiene muy pocas baterías para proteger cada ciudad. Rusia combina misiles balísticos con misiles crucero, drones y señuelos, obligando a los defensores a rastrear muchas amenazas y racionar sus interceptores.

Advertisement

La escasez de interceptores es solo una parte de un problema global

La escasez de interceptores se ha vuelto más aguda a medida que la guerra de Irán ha consumido grandes cantidades de interceptores Patriot y THAAD. Un análisis de The Associated Press estimó que el inventario de Patriot de Estados Unidos había caído al menos un 65% respecto de su nivel previo a la guerra. El Pentágono insiste en que tiene un arsenal amplio.

La producción no puede cerrar la brecha de inmediato. Lockheed Martin entregó más de 600 interceptores PAC-3 MSE en 2025 y trabaja para alcanzar una capacidad anual de 2.000 para finales de 2030. La OTAN afirma que la primera planta de producción de misiles Patriot de Europa abrirá en septiembre en Alemania.

Advertisement
Cuerpos cubiertos de las víctimas en el lugar de un ataque con misiles rusos contra una zona residencial en Kiev, Ucrania. Foto EFE

También han cambiado las señales políticas desde Washington. En una cumbre de la OTAN en Turquía en julio, el presidente Donald Trump dijo que Estados Unidos daría a Ucrania una licencia para producir Patriots. Unas tres semanas después, indicó que no había tomado una decisión final. Incluso con una licencia iniciar la producción en Ucrania llevaría años, dicen expertos.

Ucrania apunta al arquero en lugar de a la flecha

Ucrania también intenta destruir las plataformas lanzamisiles rusas y la infraestructura antes de que puedan dispararse los misiles: disparar al arquero en lugar de a la flecha.

El presidente ucraniano Volodimir Zelenski pidió a Trump que ayudara a conseguir el permiso de Elon Musk para que las fuerzas ucranianas utilicen las comunicaciones de Starlink para el señalamiento de objetivos dentro de Rusia, donde Musk ha restringido el servicio, según una persona familiarizada con el asunto. Zelenskyy también les dijo a legisladores en el Capitolio que quería que Starlink ayudara con el señalamiento de objetivos dentro de Rusia, de acuerdo con una persona presente en la sala. Ambos hablaron bajo condición de anonimato para tratar las delicadas conversaciones privadas.

Advertisement

Ese acceso podría ayudar a que los drones ucranianos localicen lanzadores y la infraestructura relacionada, reduciendo el número de misiles a los que deben enfrentarse las baterías Patriot.

Kiev también está desarrollando Freya, un sistema antibalístico propuesto, liderado por Ucrania y de menor costo, destinado a reducir la dependencia de los Patriots. Ucrania y nueve países europeos formaron una coalición en julio para impulsar una capacidad compartida de defensa antimisiles, y Zelenskyy afirmó que podrían desarrollar conjuntamente un sistema de producción masiva en un plazo de 12 meses. Freya sigue en desarrollo, y no está claro cuándo podría entrar en funcionamiento.

Tras un ataque balístico ruso contra Kiev este mes, Zelenski afirmó que Ucrania recibió solo un tercio de los misiles de defensa antiaérea en la primera mitad de 2026 en comparación con el mismo periodo del año pasado. Señaló que los socios de Ucrania que no estén dispuestos a aumentar de inmediato las entregas de interceptores deberían, en su lugar, imponer nuevas sanciones, y observó que una parte significativa de la producción rusa de misiles balísticos no se ha visto afectada por las sanciones.

Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Iran-backed terror group’s latest territorial grab threatens second global shipping chokepoint

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran-backed Houthi forces seized Yemen’s strategic port city of Mocha on Thursday and pushed toward positions overlooking the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, opening a potentially dangerous new front for global trade as shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains severely constrained.

Advertisement

The advance threatens the southern gateway to the Red Sea just as Saudi Arabia has increasingly relied on that route to bypass Hormuz — putting pressure on critical shipping lanes on both sides of the Arabian Peninsula and raising the risk of further disruptions to oil and commercial traffic through a key global trade choke point.

«Now you have Iran on one side of the Arabian Peninsula controlling Hormuz, and now the Houthis controlling Bab el-Mandeb on the other side of the peninsula,» Hisham Al-Omeisy, senior Yemen advisor at the European Institute of Peace, told Fox News Digital. «Which basically is going to drive prices — oil prices, goods and everything else — up exponentially.»

IRAN-BACKED TERROR PROXY HOUTHIS THREATEN FRESH ATTACKS AFTER YEMEN AIRPORT STRIKE

Advertisement

A vehicle burns after being attacked by Houthis during fighting with Saudi-backed forces at a location given as Al Jawf, Yemen, in this still image taken from a handout video released Sept. 9, 2026. (Al Masirah/Handout via Reuters)

On background, a senior administration official told Fox News Digital: «The United States is focused on protecting our core national security interests — such as ensuring freedom of navigation in the Red Sea — while empowering our regional partners to take the lead in managing and resolving regional security challenges. We are in continuous dialogue with Saudi Arabia and the Republic of Yemen Government regarding regional stability.»

Yemeni government sources said Thursay the Houthis captured Mocha and reached the Hanish Islands, while Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces withdrew south toward Dhubab, which sits directly on the Bab el-Mandeb opposite the strategic island of Perim. Control of Dhubab and Perim would be critical to gaining a stronger hold over the strait, Yemeni government sources told Reuters on Sept. 10.

Advertisement

Bab el-Mandeb is only about 18 miles wide at its narrowest point and connects the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden with the Red Sea and, farther north, the Suez Canal. It is a major artery for goods moving between Asia and Europe as well as energy shipments.

Its importance has grown dramatically during the Iran conflict.

WHO CONTROLS THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ RIGHT NOW? HERE’S WHAT THE SHIP TRAFFIC ACTUALLY SHOWS

Advertisement
Members of the Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces react during what they say to be clashes with Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis

Members of the Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces react during what they say are clashes with Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis in a location given as near Al-Hazm, Yemen, in this screen grab obtained from a handout video released Sept. 9, 2026. (Media Centre Of The Yemeni Armed Forces/Handout via Reuters)

The U.S. Energy Information Administration reported Sept. 9 that crude oil and petroleum liquids moving through Bab el-Mandeb averaged 8.1 million barrels per day in the second quarter of 2026, up from 5.4 million barrels per day in the final quarter of 2025. At the same time, flows through Hormuz plunged from 21.6 million barrels per day to just 4.9 million. The EIA attributed the increase at Bab el-Mandeb in part to Saudi Arabia rerouting crude through its East-West pipeline to the Red Sea port of Yanbu to avoid Hormuz.

Al-Omeisy said the danger extends beyond the Houthis’ geographical gains. He said retreating government forces left behind military materiel that could strengthen Houthi forces on other fronts.

«People are focused on taking Mocha and those outposts on the Red Sea,» Al-Omeisy said. «But the military side is terrible, particularly the equipment, the munitions, the vehicles, the drones that were at those military camps, which they can now, in turn, use against the government forces elsewhere.»

Advertisement

RUBIO ACCU.S.ES IRAN OF FLYING IRGC PERSONNEL INTO YEMEN AS HOUTHI THREAT ESCALATES

Members of the Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces fire a tank

Members of the Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces fire a tank during what they say to be clashes with Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis in a location given as near Al-Hazm, Yemen, in this screen grab obtained from a handout video released Sept. 9, 2026. (Media Centre Of The Yemeni Armed Forces/Handout via Reuters)

Reuters separately reported Thursday that Iranian arms and direct guidance from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards helped the Houthi advance, citing Yemeni government, Iranian and regional sources. Two Iranian sources told Reuters that Tehran had instructed the Houthis to intensify attacks on Saudi Arabia and promised additional funding, weapons and senior officers. Iran has publicly denied directing Houthi operations.

The seizure comes amid what conflict-monitoring organization ACLED described Sept. 9 as the most serious escalation between the Houthis and the Saudi-backed camp since hostilities resumed in mid-July.

Advertisement

ACLED recorded at least 276 fatalities between Sept. 3 and 7 as clashes spread across al-Dali, al-Bayda, Marib, Shabwa, al-Jawf, al-Hudayda and Taizz, according to an analysis published Sept. 9.

Sherwan Hindreen Ali, ACLED’s Middle East research manager, said fighting along the Red Sea coast had become particularly intense as both sides sought control over territory with direct strategic importance to Bab el-Mandeb.

«Fighting will remain focused on the fronts of the Red Sea coast in al-Hudaydah and Taizz, where both the Houthis and the Saudi Arabia/IRG have a vested interest in claiming the whole territory to deprive the other side of effective control of the strait of Bab el-Mandab,» Ali said in an analysis.

Advertisement

Saudi Arabia itself has also become more deeply involved.

EXPERT WARNS OF ‘GENERAL ESCALATION’ OF FIGHTING IF HOUTHIS RESUME RED SEA CAMPAIGN

Houthi fighters gesture as they celebrate in front of the Security Directorate building in Hays, Yemen

Houthi fighters gesture as they celebrate in front of the Security Directorate building in Hays, Yemen, in this screengrab taken from social media video released on Sept. 10, 2026. (Social Media/via Reuters)

Ali said Saudi forces launched at least 15 strikes against the Houthis between Sept. 3 and 7, mostly around Taizz, marking the highest number of Saudi strikes since Riyadh resumed military engagement against the Houthis in July.

Advertisement

The Houthis responded Sept. 8 with what Ali described as their largest wave of direct attacks on Saudi territory since March 2022, launching dozens of drones and ballistic missiles toward Abha, Jizan, Najran and Khamis Mushait. Ali said the attacks injured 73 people.

The widening fighting is now posing an early test for a new joint defense agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey.

Al-Omeisy said the international response allowed the Houthis to exploit divisions among their opponents.

Advertisement

«The Houthis are also good in exploiting divisions and delays, they move rapidly on the ground to force a status quo while the international community debates merits, responsibilities and costs of an intervention.»

The escalation also raises questions about Saudi Arabia’s newly signed defense agreement with Pakistan and Turkey.

IRAN-BACKED HOUTHI THREAT IN RED SEA COULD LEAD TO MAJOR US POLICY SHIFT, ANALYSTS SAY

Advertisement
A satellite image appears to show damage to the King Khalid Airbase at Saudi Airbase that Houthis claimed to have attacked

A satellite image appears to show damage to the King Khalid Airbase at Saudi Airbase that Houthis claimed to have attacked on Sept. 8, in this handout picture obtained by Reuters on Sept. 9, 2026. The Saudi government’s media office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (2026 Planet Labs PBC/Handout via Reuters)

The agreement, signed last month in Mecca, states that an armed attack against one member will be considered an attack against all three, Reuters reported Sept. 10. But after Houthi drones and ballistic missiles struck Saudi cities and energy infrastructure this week, Pakistan said Thursday that no military response under the pact was currently being discussed. 

«There is no such thing under discussion right now,» Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesperson Sajjad Haider Khan said, according to Reuters. «When time comes [we] will act under the agreement.» 

The Houthis, meanwhile, have said international navigation through the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb remains safe, while maintaining that Saudi vessels are subject to their previously announced blockade, Reuters reported Thursday. 

Advertisement

Al-Omeisy warned that reversing the Houthis’ latest territorial gains could become increasingly difficult.

«The Houthis are really good at capturing a position, they entrench really well,» he said. «They send these massive reinforcements, and then it’s going to be extremely difficult to push them out of those areas.»

A satellite imagery shows Bab el Mandeb Strait

A satellite imagery shows Bab el Mandeb Strait, as Iran threatens using Yemen’s Houthi allies to shut this gateway to the Red Sea, in this handout picture dated July 12, 2026. (Nasa Worldview/Handout via Reuters)

Oil markets were already responding to the widening regional threat Thursday. Brent crude jumped more than 5% to $106.60 a barrel by late Thursday morning, while U.S. crude climbed above $100 for the first time since May, according to Reuters. 

Advertisement

Reuters contributed to the story.



middle east, iran, saudi arabia, world, foreign affairs, foreign policy

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Pentagon witness blasts Virginia school district’s ‘vanilla’ 9/11 teacher guide

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A wealthy Washington, D.C., suburb’s public school district is advising teachers not to link 9/11 with radical Islam and to be sure to create «safe spaces» for Muslim students as the nation somberly marks the 25th anniversary of the terror attacks that killed nearly 3,000 Americans.

Advertisement

The guardrails in a six-page instructional guide, «25th Anniversary and Commemoration of 9/11» and distributed to teachers, has prompted critics to accuse Fairfax County (Virginia) Public School’s liberal leaders of coddling post-9/11 sensitivities rather than teaching history.

s»It’s sort of a vanilla way to do things,» retired Navy Vice Admiral Lou Crenshaw, who was stationed inside the Pentagon when al Qaeda terrorists crashed a hijacked passenger jet into the building. «Everybody can go through the deal and feel good about it. And at the end of the day, nobody complains. 

CBC TELLS JOURNALISTS NOT TO CALL 9/11 ‘TERRORIST ATTACKS’ IN INTERNAL GUIDANCE

Advertisement

«To me, that’s not exactly what we need to do. We need to make sure that the kids have learned a lesson here. And that’s not going to happen if we try to shave the facts to the point where it’s hard to figure out what we’re talking about.»

A digital content analysis reveals that about half of the 1,740-word document is devoted to tips for creating «safe spaces for Muslim and Middle Eastern students,» about 15% spells out specific 9/11 instruction and the rest of the document tip-toes around managing «emotional responses» to the lesson.

In northern Virginia, Fairfax County Public Schools distributes a guide for 9/11 lessons, with a list of «Do’s and «Don’ts» (Fairfax County Public Schools)

Advertisement

The guide by the school district, which sits only a few miles from the Pentagon and several military bases, mentions military families only three times and first responders only once, saying at one point, «Many families of military personnel and first responders experienced loss and hardship.»

Meanwhile, it has 30 references to Islam, «Muslim families,» «Muslim students,» «anti-Muslim racism,» «anti-Middle Eastern» rhetoric, «Islamophobic rhetoric» and «Middle Eastern students» and families. It includes a bulleted list of «critical considerations» to challenge anti-Muslim bias.

The curriculum guidance speaks to a wider tension about how the 9/11 attacks are described by influential figures from teachers, journalists and politicians to social media influencers as a network of powerful Muslim organizations have built educational programs over the past 25 years downplaying discussions about the extremist interpretations of Islam that motivated al Qaeda and the 19 hijackers involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Advertisement

On Thursday, New York Police Department Commissioner Jessica Tisch called for «moral clarity» about what happened on 9/11, saying in a speech, «The men who attacked this city were terrorists. The men and women who ran into the towers to save innocent lives were heroes.

«Twenty-five years cannot be allowed to blur that distinction, and shame on those who do.»

Last month, after a major public backlash, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reversed earlier guidance that instructed journalists to avoid calling 9/11 a «terrorist attack.»

Advertisement
Fairfax County Public Schools provides teachers a guide that includes

Fairfax County Public Schools provides teachers a guide that includes «critical considerations» to avoid discussing the extremist interpretation of Islam that motivated the 9/11 hijackers. (Fairfax County Public Schools)

In a statement provided to Fox News Digital, Fairfax County Public Schools said the school community has a «deeply personal connection to September 11 because of our proximity to the Pentagon and the many military-connected families we serve.

«On the 25th anniversary of the terrorist attacks, we remember the nearly 3,000 people who were killed, including 184 at the Pentagon. We remember the victims, their families, the survivors, and everyone whose lives were forever changed. We honor the first responders whose courage and sacrifice continue to inspire us,» the school district said.

«FCPS remains committed to creating an inclusive environment in our schools where all students feel welcome and respected as we strive to provide a world-class education and workplace.»

Advertisement

LIZ PEEK: WE CANNOT LET THE LEFT REWRITE WHAT HAPPENED ON 9/11

Smoke pours from the World Trade Center

Smoke pours from the twin towers of the World Trade Center after they were hit by two hijacked airliners in a terrorist attack Sept. 11, 2001, in New York City. (Robert Giroux/Getty Images)

Crenshaw saw the effects on military and civilian families impacted by the attack. On the fateful morning, Crenshaw was stationed on the Pentagon’s E Ring. He watched the TV footage of two airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center.

«I thought, ‘This is not a good thing,’» Crenshaw recalled.

Advertisement

He then continued with a scheduled appointment, but as it began, the Pentagon was struck.

«Just about the time they sat down, and we started the interview, there was tremendous noise,» Crenshaw said. «Bang! The entire building shook, and we knew right away that something bad had happened.»

Crenshaw, who served in the Navy from 1974 to 2007, was on the fourth floor of the Pentagon on the same side of the building hit by the plane. His work area did not immediately collapse, although he said it was later destroyed by fire.

Advertisement

He looked outside and saw smoke billowing from the area where the airplane had hit. He also remembered seeing a chief petty officer crying as windows shattered and glass scattered across the floor.

9/11 memorial and Osama bin laden poster

Our Flag Was Still There features flags related to 9/11 as the nation marks 25 years since the 2001 terrorist attacks and celebrates its 250th anniversary. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images; Craig Ruttle/Pool/Getty Images)

The reality of the attack soon became clear to Crenshaw and the rest of the country. Al Qaeda, an extremist terrorist organization led by Usama bin Laden, had carried out a coordinated assault. The group used an extremist interpretation of Islam to justify the attack, portraying it as retaliation for the presence of U.S. forces overseas and American foreign policy. Bin Laden associate Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who took credit for planning the attack, awaits a trial in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Crenshaw said students should understand that 9/11 was not simply «a coordinated terrorist attack on the United States,» as the FCPS script describes it, but a strategic act of war.

Advertisement

«What we saw in 9/11 was a religious extremist group, al Qaeda, who did not tolerate what the United States was doing around the world and decided to react violently,» Crenshaw said.

Teachers should be prepared to discuss the Islamist extremism behind the attack without collectively blaming all Muslims, he said, noting that he agreed it is important to make sure Muslim students aren’t shamed.

«They are a branch of Islam, but they certainly do not espouse any of the values that we know of Islam worldwide,» said Crenshaw. «And, therefore, they really shouldn’t be considered to be part of that mainstream religion.»

Advertisement
Fairfax County Public Schools provides teachers a guidance on teaching about the 9/11 attacks with an emphasis on challenging

Fairfax County Public Schools provides teachers guidance on teaching about the 9/11 attacks with an emphasis on challenging «anti-Muslim racism.» (Fairfax County Public Schools)

The guide includes a section titled «Responding to Racism, Hate, and Bias against Muslims and Middle Eastern People,» telling teachers that Muslim students experience «the worst anti-Muslim racism» during Sept. 11 lessons.

FCPS instructs teachers the anniversary «may intensify anti-Muslim and anti-Middle Eastern rhetoric.» They are told that speaking out against anti-Muslim bias is part of their «sacred role as teachers.»

The guide also says that if educators hear students or colleagues using «Islamophobic rhetoric,» «it is up to you to disrupt.»

Advertisement

Under a list of «Do» and «Don’t» instructions, FCPS explicitly tells teachers don’t «associate the 9/11 attacks with Islam or Muslims» and don’t «center the extremists or the acts of the extremists.»

The guide says the commemoration should focus on «those whose lives were lost and those who sacrificed to help others – not those who attacked the United States.»

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused mastermind of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, in a file photo

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, has been held at Guantánamo Bay since 2003. (AP)

The guide says teachers should not focus a commemorative lesson on «an examination of Islam.» It argues that doing so could send the «harmful message» that «Islam, or all Muslims, are responsible for these terrorist attacks.»

Advertisement

Crenshaw said not explaining the ideology of the hijackers and how al Qaeda interpreted Islam to justify the attacks means the guide fails to deliver «a sense of urgency or the evilness of what actually happened.»

september 11, islam, controversies education, virginia, terrorism

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Cómo será el acto central por el 25° aniversario de los ataques terroristas del 11-S: Trump será el primer presidente en no asistir

Published

on


Estados Unidos conmemorará este viernes el 25° aniversario de los atentados terroristas del 11 de septiembre de 2001.

Lo hará en actos separados. El principal se llevará a cabo por la mañana en Nueva York, frente al memorial ubicado en la Zona Cero, donde se hallaban las Torres Gemelas, en Manhattan.

Advertisement

La ceremonia prohíbe desde 2012 cualquier intervención activa de políticos, más allá de su presencia. Por ello, el presidente Donald Trump encabezará un acto en el Pentágono, otro de los puntos atacados por los terroristas, donde prevé dar un discurso.

Será el primer presidente en activo que no asiste a la conmemoración en Nueva York. Enviará en su lugar al vicepresidente JD Vance.

Cómo será el acto central

El acto central se realizará en el Memorial del 11-S, en el Bajo Manhattan.

Advertisement

Allí se reunirán familiares de las víctimas y autoridades para recordar a las casi 3.000 personas que murieron en los atentados ocurridos cuandos dos aviones comerciales, secuestrados por comandos terrroristas, se estrellaron contra las Torres Gemelas del World Trader Center.

El atentado terrorista del 11 de septiembre de 2001 dejó secuelas que aún perduran en la sociedad estadounidense (Foto: AFP)

En la ceremonia, los familiares de las víctimas leerán los nombres de los fallecidos. Además, se guardarán siete minutos de silencio: seis por los ataques y un último por los fallecidos por enfermedades relacionadas con el 11S.

“Hemos trabajado intencionalmente para mantener la conmemoración libre de política, porque recordar a quienes perdimos el 11 de septiembre nunca debe ser una cuestión partidista”, dijo un portavoz del Memorial y Museo del 11S, que organiza la ceremonia.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, al acto asistirán numerosos políticos estadounidenses, pero no tendrán una participación activa. Se prevé la asistencia de los expresidentes Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden y George W. Bush (quien ejercía el poder en momento de los ataques), así como el alcalde neoyorquino, Zohran Mamdani.

El jefe comunal viene de realizar un anuncio que conmovió al país en una fecha especial para los estadounidenses.

Leé también: A 25 años del 11S: Al Qaeda sigue vigente, pero su influencia quedó reducida por el avance del Estado Islámico

Advertisement

El martes, Mamdani anunció la publicación de miles de documentos que revelan que las autoridades de la ciudad en ese momento ocultaron que el aire era “tóxico” en la Zona Cero de los atentados del 11 de septiembre.

“Son documentos que muestran lo que la ciudad sabía sobre el aire tóxico alrededor de la Zona Cero, cuándo lo supo y cómo actuó para limitar su responsabilidad”, aseguró Mamdani.

El alcalde informó de que se divulgarán más de 170.000 páginas de registros municipales que muestran, entre otras cosas “cómo se encontró amianto prácticamente en todos los lugares examinados”.

Advertisement

Qué hará Trump

Trump empezó esta semana una serie de actos para recordar a las víctimas de los ataques.

El martes, en un acto en Washington, prometió “no olvidar jamás” lo que ocurrió aquel día.

El acto, realizado en el parque público conocido como la Elipse, fue encabezado por la Tunnel to Towers Foundation y exhibió una enorme viga de acero de 6,4 metros y casi 7711 kilogramos, recuperada de la Torre Sur del World Trade Center en Nueva York.

Advertisement

En su discurso, Trump rindió un homenaje especial a dos hombres que murieron en los ataques: Jeffrey Palazzo, bombero de la ciudad de Nueva York, y Welles Crowther, un joven operador de acciones que se hizo conocido como el “hombre del pañuelo rojo” tras rescatar a varias personas durante los ataques.

Este viernes, Trump hablará en un acto conmemorativo en el Pentágono, otro de los blancos de los terroristas.

El presidente quería hablar en la Zona Cero, pero no podía hacerlo debido a las normas de la organización, según informó The New York Times.

Advertisement

Trump intentó desmentir la información en su red social Truth Social, donde aseguró que ha estado en Nueva York “muchas veces” a lo largo de los años y que en la ceremonia “nadie habla” porque es “solemne”, y arremetió contra la autora de la información, insultando su trabajo y su físico.

Vance, por su parte, destacó en una rueda de prensa en la Casa Blanca la unión del país en torno a los atentados, aunque aprovechó para criticar al expresidente Biden y bromeó con que tendrá “muchas conversaciones intelectuales intensas” y “lo pasarán genial”.

11 de septiembre de 2001, Nueva York

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias