Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Dem strategy session to stop hemorrhaging of male voters ridiculed

Published

on


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

Advertisement
By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

More than six months after the Democratic Party suffered major setbacks in the 2024 elections, the party is seeking a path to escape the political wilderness.

Part of that effort includes a recent gathering by top party consultants and donors trying to figure out how Democrats can improve outreach to male and working-class voters.

Advertisement

President Donald Trump won back control of the White House while Republicans flipped the Senate and defended their fragile House majority in November, and the GOP made gains among Black and Hispanic voters, as well as younger voters – all traditional members of the Democratic Party’s base.

«Everything we’ve done up to this point has resulted in re-electing Donald Trump,» longtime Democratic strategist and communicator Joe Caiazzo told Fox News Digital.

OPINION: WHAT DEMOCRATS NEED TO DO TO WIN AGAIN

Advertisement

Then-Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her presidential nomination acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention on Aug. 22, 2024 in Chicago. (Fox News – Paul Steinhauser)

«If anyone tells you that we don’t have to course correct, they don’t know what they’re talking about,» added Caiazzo, a veteran of Sen. Bernie Sanders 2016 and 2020 presidential campaigns.

In the face of Trump’s sweeping and controversial moves since his return to the White House in January, an increasingly angered and energized base of Democrats is pushing for party leaders to take a stronger stand in leading the resistance to the president and Republicans.

Advertisement

The anger directed not only at Trump and Republicans, but also at fellow Democrats, appears to be a factor in the party’s polling woes, with Democratic Party favorable ratings sinking to historic lows.

Biden and Harris on DNC stage

Kamala Harris and Joe Biden at the DNC.  (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

WATCH: DEMOCRATS’ PARTY CHAIR MAKES CASE IN ‘FOX NEWS SUNDAY’ APPEARANCE

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin vows the party will compete in all 50 states going forward. 

Advertisement

In an interview earlier this month on «Fox News Sunday,» Martin highlighted that the party’s focus right now is «squarely on making sure that we stand up for hardworking Americans who are being left behind in this Trump economy.»

A 2024 election DNC postmortem is currently underway, with the findings expected to be issued later this year. However, grabbing the spotlight in recent days was a gathering hosted by the Democrat-aligned super PAC Future Forward at a luxury resort along the California coast.

Among the strategy discussions at the gathering was a $20 million effort titled, «Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan.»

Advertisement

The recommendations of the effort, which is code-named SAM, included having Democrats drop what is described as a «moralizing tone» toward male voters, changing the party’s language used toward men and purchasing more ads on video games as part of male outreach.

Some former key staffers on the 2024 campaign of former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, who replaced Biden as the party’s nominee last summer, heavily criticized the effort, which was first reported by the New York Times and later confirmed by Fox News.

«Instead of studying working-class voters and men, why doesn’t the Democratic Party donor class go out and meet some? What the hell is this?» James Singer, a spokesman for the 2024 campaign, wrote in a social media post. «As a Democrat, it’s embarrassing.»

Advertisement

It was a similar message from Ammar Moussa, another veteran Democratic strategist and communicator who worked on the Biden and Harris campaigns.

«This is embarrassing. Truly,» Moussa wrote on X.

Democrats have long had a problem attracting male voters in presidential elections. Trump won the male vote by 12 points over Harris in the 2024 presidential election, and according to the Fox News Voter Analysis, that margin ballooned to 15 points among men 45 and older.

Advertisement

Fast-forward to this spring, and the Democrats’ ratings stood underwater in the latest Fox News national poll at 41% favorable and 56% unfavorable in a survey conducted April 18-21.

That is an all-time low for the Democrats in Fox News polling, and for the first time in a decade, the party’s standing was lower than that of the GOP, which stood at 44% favorable and 54% unfavorable.

The figures were reversed last summer, when Fox News last asked the party favorability question in one of its surveys.

Advertisement

HEAD HERE FOR THE LATEST FOX NEWS POLLING

The Fox News poll was far from an outlier.

The Democratic Party’s favorable ratings were well in negative territory in a Pew Research national survey – 38% favorable, 60% unfavorable – conducted in early April and at 36% favorable, 60% unfavorable in a Wall Street Journal poll in the field a couple of weeks earlier.

Advertisement

Additionally, national polls conducted in February by Quinnipiac University and March by CNN and by NBC News also indicated the favorable ratings for the Democratic Party sinking to all-time lows.

However, there is more.

Confidence in the Democratic Party’s congressional leadership also sunk to an all-time low, according to a Gallup poll conducted early last month.

Advertisement

The confidence rating for Democrats’ leadership in Congress stood at 25% in the survey, which was nine points below the previous low of 34% recorded in 2023.

The semi-annual Harvard Youth Poll, which was released late last month, indicated that approval ratings for Democrats in Congress among Americans aged 18-29 nosedived.

An ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll conducted in mid-April indicated that more respondents trusted Trump (40%) than Democrats in Congress (32%) to handle the nation’s main problems.

Advertisement

Additionally, a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted late last month suggested Republicans hold a significant advantage over Democrats on two top issues: the economy and immigration.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

«If Democrats want to be competitive in this country and build lasting majorities in both chambers and be competitive for the White House, we’ve got to broaden the tent,» Caiazzo insisted.

Advertisement

He lamented that Democrats have «become hyper-focused on a certain set of issues that only speak to a certain set of people while letting the most important issues of the day fall by the wayside. Every single day, Democrats should be focused on how we make things better for working people. And the way we deliver that message has got to meet people where they are.»

Politics,Elections,Democratic Party,Donald Trump,Voting,Republicans,Fox News Poll

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

NYC mayoral rivals unite against billionaire ‘election interference’ as campaign enters final stretch

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

With two weeks until Election Day, Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa have landed on unlikely common ground: rejecting billionaire influence in the New York City mayoral election.

Advertisement

Two billionaires, Red Apple Media CEO John Catsimatidis and hedge fund CEO Bill Ackman, are calling on Sliwa to drop out of the mayoral race in order to clear a pathway to victory for former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an Independent candidate.

«The billionaires can conspire to pick their candidate,» Sliwa said during a press conference in Manhattan on Monday. «I trust the people. They will make the decision. I will not drop out.»

BILL ACKMAN JUMPS INTO NYC MAYORAL FIGHT, SAYS SLIWA MUST DROP OR ‘WE ARE TOAST’

Advertisement

New York City mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa speaks to reporters in Manhattan on Monday, Oct. 20, 2025, with two weeks until Election Day. (Fox News Digital/Deirdre Heavey)

Several blocks downtown at his own press conference Monday morning, Mamdani admitted his surprise to agree with Sliwa. 

«I never thought I would say this, but here we are, where the only candidates who agree that billionaires shouldn’t control the future of this city are the Republican nominee and the Democratic nominee,» Mamdani said. 

Advertisement

Catsimatidis, who is also the CEO of WABC Radio, publicly urged Sliwa to drop out of the race on Monday. Sliwa has long hosted a radio program on WABC but is on leave while he runs for mayor. 

«Curtis would make the best mayor of all the candidates … but Curtis has to realize that he should love New York more than anything else,» he said. «It certainly looks like Curtis should pull out right now.» 

«I’m not dropping out,» Sliwa reaffirmed to reporters on Monday while responding to Catsimatidis’ plea. 

Advertisement

TOP 5 MOMENTS FROM FIERY NYC MAYORAL DEBATE: ‘HE LITERALLY HAS NEVER HAD A JOB’

New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani

New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani fields reporter questions in Manhattan on Monday, Oct. 20, 2025. (Fox News Digital/Deirdre Heavey)

A recent Fox News survey of the mayoral race, conducted Oct. 10–14, asked voters about their second-choice candidate. If both Adams and Sliwa are out, the results show Mamdani keeping a significant lead, even as support for Cuomo increases. 

With Sliwa out, the poll found Mamdani would pick up 50% compared to 37% to Cuomo.

Advertisement

Yet, Cuomo on Monday said that when New Yorkers realize that Sliwa dropping out would create a head-to-head matchup with Mamdani, «they’ll discard the spoiler Curtis Sliwa and rally behind Cuomo to save the city.»

When asked who bears responsibility if Mamdani is elected mayor, Sliwa told Fox News Digital on Monday, «We blame Andrew Cuomo.»

«I would suggest to Andrew Cuomo, stop this nonsense. You are the one who is responsible for Zohran Mamdani. You got beaten mightily in a Democratic primary,» Sliwa said when asked about Cuomo calling him a «spoiler.»

Advertisement

Mamdani on Sunday responded to a viral clip of Sliwa reiterating that he will stay in the race, despite pleas from billionaires, like Ackman. 

«It’s genuinely positive for our democracy that there’s another candidate in this race who believes NYC voters should pick their next mayor, not billionaires who mostly live somewhere else,» Mamdani said in the post

CUOMO RALLIES BUSINESS LEADERS AGAINST SOCIALIST CANDIDATE AS NYC MAYORAL RACE REACHES BOILING POINT

Advertisement
sliwa and mamdani nyc debate

Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa, left, speaks while participating in a mayoral debate with Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani, right, and independent candidate former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (not pictured), Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025, in New York.  (AP Photo/Angelina Katsanis, Pool)

Ackman and Catsimatidis are among those billionaires arguing that a vote for Sliwa is a vote for Mamdani. 

«Like that Ackman, out in Chappaqua, what does he know about New York City?» Sliwa questioned on Monday, telling reporters that billionaires «have paved the way for Zohran Mamdani because every time they fail, it makes it easier for Zohran Mamdani to campaign.»

«They should stay out of it, focus on Wall Street, hedge funds. They know nothing about the streets, as clearly evidenced by their panic,» Sliwa said, urging billionaires to «let the people decide.» 

Advertisement

«Billionaires should be ashamed of themselves for interfering with this election. I call it election interference. Let the people decide. That’s the way I was raised. That’s the way everybody was raised. Nobody was ever told the billionaires were going to pick the person who wins an election.» 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Mamdani agreed with his Republican opponent on Monday, arguing that New Yorkers «no matter what they think about our politics, want to make their own decisions, and that is one place where Curtis and I agree, which is that it’s time for New Yorkers to make this decision, not for billionaire donors to decide who gets to run this city.»

Advertisement

«To have a candidate spending all his time pleading with another candidate to get, it shows that he doesn’t have much to share with New Yorkers himself,» Mamdani said of Cuomo. 

Fox News Digital reached out to Cuomo for comment but did not immediately receive a response. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Editorial de The Times: Rusia no se detendrá hasta que la OTAN actúe

Published

on


Rusia ha lanzado una nueva y peligrosa campaña de provocación contra la OTAN.

Durante las últimas seis semanas, ha enviado drones sobre Polonia y Rumanía y ha desplegado aviones de combate en Estonia.

Advertisement

Es muy probable que Rusia también esté detrás de los vuelos con drones que interrumpieron la actividad en aeropuertos de Dinamarca, Bélgica y Alemania.

El presidente Vladímir Putin ha negado, de forma poco convincente, su responsabilidad en todos estos actos y, de hecho, parece estar contento de que el mundo crea que Rusia está detrás de ellos.

Sus objetivos son asustar, agotar y dividir a los europeos, haciéndoles cuestionar su apoyo a Ucrania y socavar sus esfuerzos por repeler la invasión rusa.

Advertisement

En última instancia, también quiere que Estados Unidos parezca débil y fragmentar la alianza de la OTAN.

Responder con prudencia es vital para Washington y Europa.

Contraatacar con dureza corre el riesgo de intensificar el conflicto, mientras que no hacer nada transmite una debilidad que invita a futuras agresiones.

Advertisement
El secretario general de la OTAN, Mark Rutte, habla durante una rueda de prensa en la sede de la Alianza en Bruselas, Bélgica, el 23 de septiembre de 2025. REUTERS/Geert Vanden Wijngaert

Los aliados de la OTAN son conscientes de que Rusia los está poniendo a prueba y, hasta ahora, han respondido eficazmente.

Han denunciado las incursiones, culpado abiertamente a Rusia de ellas y se han reunido este mes en Copenhague en una muestra de unidad.

«No estamos en guerra», declaró recientemente el canciller alemán Friedrich Merz, «pero tampoco estamos en paz».

Advertisement

Los líderes europeos deben dejar claro que la agresión rusa contra los países de la OTAN corre el riesgo de recibir una respuesta contundente, que incluye el derribo de drones —como ya ha hecho Occidente— y, potencialmente, de aviones de combate rusos que entren en el espacio aéreo de la OTAN.

Estados Unidos y sus aliados de la OTAN también deberían aprovechar la nueva agresión rusa para aumentar su apoyo a Ucrania, enviando así el mensaje de que el intento de Putin de debilitar la determinación occidental ha fracasado.

La visita del presidente ucraniano Volodymyr Zelensky a la Casa Blanca el viernes le brindó a Trump la oportunidad de comprometerse con nueva ayuda militar y económica, y debería aprovecharla.

Advertisement

Todas estas respuestas conllevan riesgos, incluyendo el peligro de una escalada.

Sin embargo, a estas alturas, el mundo debería saber que no hay opciones seguras con Putin.

Ignorar o minimizar sus agresiones las fomenta aún más.

Advertisement

Si llega a creer que puede amenazar a Polonia, Estonia y otros miembros de la OTAN sin consecuencias, se volverá más audaz al hacerlo.

«No solo debemos reaccionar, sino también disuadir», declaró Ursula von der Leyen, presidenta de la Comisión Europea.

«Porque si dudamos en actuar, la zona gris solo se ampliará».

Advertisement

Tiene razón. A veces, la mejor manera de prevenir una escalada militar es trazar una línea firme.

Provocaciones

Las últimas provocaciones rusas comenzaron el 9 de septiembre con más de una docena de drones que entraron en Polonia tras sobrevolar Bielorrusia y Ucrania.

Advertisement

Cinco días después, un dron entró en Rumanía, cerca de dos cazas rumanos que patrullaban.

Cinco días después, tres aviones MiG rusos entraron en Estonia.

Luego se produjo una misteriosa intrusión de drones civiles en aeropuertos comerciales.

Advertisement

La semana posterior al incidente de Estonia, varios drones volaron cerca de dos aeropuertos de Dinamarca en lo que el ministro de Defensa del país denominó un «ataque híbrido», y las autoridades cerraron brevemente los aeropuertos para evitar el riesgo de un accidente.

Posteriormente, los drones interrumpieron el transporte aéreo en Bélgica y Alemania.

La OTAN respondió bien a estas provocaciones.

Advertisement

Los MiG sobre Estonia crearon el problema más espinoso, ya que planteaban la posibilidad de una confrontación militar entre pilotos humanos.

Sin embargo, los pilotos suecos y finlandeses se enfrentaron a los MiG, y los pilotos rusos se retiraron, dejando a Estonia escoltada por los aviones de la OTAN.

La respuesta a los drones fue aún más agresiva.

Advertisement

Una combinación de pilotos polacos, holandeses, italianos y alemanes interceptó los drones que sobrevolaban Polonia, derribando varios de ellos.

En Rumanía, los pilotos rastrearon el dron ruso, que abandonó el espacio aéreo de la OTAN por sí solo.

Una desventaja de destruir drones es su alto costo.

Advertisement

Algunos de los misiles que utilizó la OTAN costaron un millón de dólares, mucho más que un dron.

Para abordar este problema, la OTAN debería ampliar la producción de drones armados, desarrollar defensas de guerra electrónica más eficaces contra ellos y financiar la investigación de otras contramedidas.

La agresión rusa debería servir de recordatorio de que la guerra está cambiando y que las industrias de defensa deben adaptarse a ella.

Advertisement

En cuanto a futuras intrusiones de aviones rusos pilotados, algunos países de Europa del Este abogan por flexibilizar las normas sobre cómo y cuándo los pilotos de la OTAN pueden enfrentarse a los aviones rusos que entran en el espacio aéreo de la alianza.

Una combinación de cautela y firmeza es la mejor opción.

Nadie quiere un conflicto directo entre la OTAN y Rusia, pero la historia demuestra que el uso de la fuerza puede llevar a Putin a replegarse.

Advertisement

A mediados de la década de 2010, aviones rusos sobrevolaron ocasionalmente Turquía, y Turquía, miembro de la OTAN, le ordenó a Rusia que se detuviera.

Solo después de que Turquía derribara un avión, Rusia se retiró.

También es importante responder en el escenario que más preocupa a Putin:

Advertisement

Las incursiones parecen haber sido, en parte, una reacción a la reciente ambigüedad estadounidense.

Ocurrieron menos de un mes después de una cumbre en Alaska, durante la cual Putin logró que Trump desistiera de sus esfuerzos por presionar a Rusia para que aceptara un alto el fuego en Ucrania. Europa se sintió justificadamente decepcionada.

Europa se sintió justificadamente decepcionada.

Advertisement

Aun así, si Putin creía que Alaska ofrecía una oportunidad para dividir aún más a los aliados, se equivocó.

En respuesta a las incursiones, y quizás debido a la falta de avances diplomáticos, Trump ha expresado una creciente frustración.

El mes pasado, afirmó que Putin «realmente me ha decepcionado».

Advertisement

Trump también afirmó que los aviones de la OTAN deberían derribar aeronaves rusas que entren en el espacio aéreo aliado y planteó la posibilidad de nuevas formas de apoyo a Ucrania.

Ya ha autorizado un mayor intercambio de inteligencia con Kiev para aumentar la eficacia de sus ataques, incluidos aquellos contra instalaciones de petróleo y gas rusas.

Otra opción consiste en permitir que Ucrania obtenga misiles Tomahawk.

Advertisement

Estos misiles tienen un alcance de 1.600 kilómetros y Ucrania podría usarlos para atacar zonas más profundas de Rusia.

El historial de impulsividad de Trump y su larga trayectoria de cercanía con Putin ofrecen razones para dudar de que esta nueva postura perdure.

El jueves, ambos líderes hablaron por teléfono durante más de dos horas, y Trump calificó la conversación de «muy productiva».

Advertisement

Planean reunirse próximamente en Budapest.

Esa reunión brindará la oportunidad de trazar una línea firme.

La reciente agresión de Rusia a la OTAN demuestra que la guerra rusa en Ucrania va mucho más allá de Ucrania.

Advertisement

Se trata de las ambiciones revanchistas de Putin en Europa.

La única manera de contenerlo es con fuerza y ​​determinación.

c.2025 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Hamas releases coffin of dead hostage to Red Cross, IDF confirms

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A coffin of a deceased hostage has been transferred from Hamas to the Red Cross, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said on Monday.

Advertisement

The coffin is being transferred into Red Cross’ custody and is on the way to Israeli troops  in Gaza, according to the IDF.

«Hamas is required to uphold the agreement and take the necessary steps to return all the hostages,» the IDF said on X. 

Earlier on Monday, it was announced that the remains of Nepali student Bipin Joshi, who was held hostage in Gaza, were being flown from Israel to his hometown of Bhimdattanagar.

Advertisement

US MILITARY TO OVERSEE NEXT PHASE OF PEACE DEAL FROM COORDINATION BASE IN ISRAEL

A Nepal Army personnel pays his last respects to the coffin of Bipin Joshi, a deceased Nepali student who was killed while being held hostage in Gaza, at the Tribhuvan International Airport in Kathmandu on October 20, 2025, days after it was returned from Hamas captivity under a Gaza ceasefire and hostage exchange deal. ( Prakash Mathema/AFP)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Hamas has now handed over the remains of nearly half of the 28 dead hostages in Gaza, a key step in the week-old ceasefire process meant to end two years of war. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This is a developing story. Check back here for updates. 

Advertisement



middle east,israel,world,wars

Continue Reading

Tendencias