INTERNACIONAL
Pakistani general says Iran diplomacy still alive, despite US blockade, failed talks

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The United States began enforcing a naval blockade targeting Iranian maritime traffic Monday, sharply escalating tensions in the Gulf just hours after high-level talks in Pakistan between Washington and Tehran collapsed without a deal.
The move, announced by President Donald Trump, came after negotiations in Islamabad ended without a breakthrough, despite what participants described as rare direct engagement between the two sides.
But Lt. Gen. (ret.) Mohammed Saeed, former chief of general staff of the Pakistan Army, said in an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital that the talks came far closer to success than their outcome suggests — and argued that diplomacy is still within reach.
«Both sides are saying they were very close … even inches away from a solution,» he said based on his own knowledge and reports. Saeed retired in 2023 but remained part of the core team handling operational planning, internal security coordination, and sensitive periods of political tension.
JD VANCE RETURNS TO WASHINGTON AFTER 16 HOURS OF IRAN PEACE TALKS COLLAPSE IN PAKISTAN
«They talked to each other in a very friendly manner. There was, from both sides, an expression of accommodation and understanding from each other. So, what you can briefly say is that the engagement has sufficient potential to resume.»
The United States began enforcing a naval blockade targeting Iranian maritime traffic April 13, 2026. (Farooq NAEEM / AFP via Getty Images)
Speaking at the White House Monday, Trump defended the blockade, saying, «Right now, there’s no fighting. Right now, we have a blockade … Iran is doing absolutely no business, and we’re going to keep it that way very easily.»
He added that Iran’s military capabilities had been significantly degraded, saying its «Navy has gone, their air force is gone, their anti-aircraft is gone, their radar is gone and their leaders are gone.»
Vice President JD Vance, who led the U.S. delegation, pressed Iran to accept a strict «zero enrichment» policy and remove its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.
«The simple fact is that we need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon,» Vance said at a press conference in Islamabad.
Iranian leaders rejected those demands, insisting that any agreement must include the immediate release of billions of dollars in frozen assets.
Now, with the blockade in place, Saeed suggested the move may be designed less as a military endgame and more as leverage.
«This blockade could be … a maneuver to build further pressure on Iran to negotiate,» he said.
TRUMP WARNS CHINA OF ‘STAGGERING’ 50% TARIFF IF CAUGHT SUPPLYING MILITARY AID TO IRAN

Vice President JD Vance speaks during a news conference after meeting with representatives from Pakistan and Iran in Islamabad, Pakistan, April 12, 2026. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
The escalation has raised concerns globally, particularly for countries dependent on Gulf energy flows, including Pakistan.
«Everyone in the world must be worried about what kind of economic negative spin-offs such a blockade would have,» Saeed said.
Saeed, who until recently sat at the center of Pakistan’s military leadership, framed the Islamabad talks as a critical reopening of dialogue after decades of hostility.
«It is the first time in 47 years … that there was engagement at the highest level,» he said, calling it «a great moment for diplomacy» and a demonstration of Pakistan’s ability to maintain credibility with both Washington and Tehran.
He pointed in particular to Pakistan’s army chief, Asim Munir, a figure who has drawn unusual attention in Washington.
Trump has publicly praised Munir, at one point calling him his «favorite field marshal,» elevating his profile as a key intermediary in regional diplomacy.
Munir, who rose through Pakistan’s intelligence ranks before becoming army chief, previously served as director general of military intelligence and later led the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). His career has been defined by deep involvement in regional security and intelligence coordination, including longstanding engagement with Iran.
‘GATE OF TEARS’ AT RISK: IRAN THREATENS MAJOR NEW GLOBAL CHOKEPOINT IF US MOVES ON HORMUZ

Security personnel inspect vehicles entering the Foreign Ministry office in Islamabad on April 9, 2026. (Aamir QURESHI / AFP via Getty Images)
Those ties could prove critical in the current crisis, according to Saeed.
«What people do not know is that when he was director general of military intelligence … he was interacting with Iranians at multiple levels continuously,» Saeed said, describing years of direct engagement with Iran’s military, intelligence and political leadership, including former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in a U.S. strike during Trump’s first term.
«He has had interaction with them for a long time … visiting Iran frequently and interacting on multiple issues,» Saeed said, adding that many current Iranian officials would already be familiar with Munir from earlier roles.
That continuity, he argued, gives Pakistan a rare advantage at a moment when formal diplomatic channels are strained.
«What one can say is that he continues to be one figure internationally who has a personal interaction … in the intelligence community in Iran in the military hierarchy and also on the side of the political leadership,» Saeed said.
«So that’s a huge advantage he has on the other side.»
TRUMP VOICES FRUSTRATION WITH NATO, SAYS IRANIAN NAVY ‘DESTROYED’ AS US PREPS FOR BLOCKADE

Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi were greeted by Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Army Chief Field Marshal Gen. Asim Munir upon their arrival at Nur Khan airbase in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on April 11, 2026. (Pakistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs/AP)
For Pakistan, that personal access — combined with its simultaneous relationship with Washington — has become central to its effort to position itself as a credible intermediary, even as the region edges closer to confrontation.
At the same time, Pakistan’s role as a mediator has drawn scrutiny, particularly given its longstanding position on Israel and recent inflammatory remarks by senior officials.
When asked whether Pakistan can be seen as a neutral broker while not recognizing Israel — an actor directly involved in strikes on Iran — Saeed downplayed the issue, saying Israel was not part of the diplomatic track.
«Pakistan’s position with regard to relations with Israel has been consistent since our independence,» he said, adding that Islamabad’s mediation efforts were focused solely on Washington and Tehran.
«Neither of their representatives was on the table … Pakistan was mediating between the U.S. and Iran,» he said.
Despite the current escalation, Saeed maintained that diplomatic channels remain open.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Iranians react after a ceasefire announcement at the Enqelab square, in Tehran, on April 8, 2026. The United States and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire Tuesday barely an hour before U.S. President Donald Trump’s deadline to obliterate the rival country was set to expire, with Tehran to temporarily reopen the vital Strait of Hormuz. (AFP via Getty Images)
«There is a lot of space … for resuming the process,» he said, suggesting talks could restart in Islamabad or elsewhere if both sides shift course.
«On Pakistan’s side, from my personal knowledge of the field marshal, they are relentless. They would not give up. They must not have given up. They must be continuously in touch with both sides. And they would try their best to convince both sides that the blockade is not going to be in their interest, in the interest of the region and in the interest of the international community.»
war with iran, middle east foreign policy, us navy, treaties, iran, sanctions
INTERNACIONAL
Continúa la incertidumbre en Medio Oriente por la respuesta de Irán a la propuesta de paz de EEUU

Estados Unidos espera una respuesta oficial de Irán a sus propuestas para poner fin a más de dos meses de enfrentamientos en Medio Oriente. El sábado, la actividad militar en la región disminuyó de manera considerable, dando paso a una jornada marcada por la expectativa y la cautela.
El secretario de Estado estadounidense, Marco Rubio, había anticipado que la contestación iraní llegaría en cuestión de horas, pero hasta el momento no se registraron novedades por parte de Irán ni Pakistán, país mediador que fue sede en las primeras negociaciones presenciales e indirectas entre Washington y Teherán.
Las conversaciones diplomáticas se intensificaron con una reunión entre Rubio y el primer ministro qatarí, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani, celebrada en Miami.
En ese encuentro, ambos líderes enfatizaron la necesidad de mantener la cooperación regional para disuadir amenazas y promover la estabilidad en Medio Oriente. El comunicado oficial de la delegación estadounidense evitó mencionar a Irán explícitamente en el resumen de la reunión.
En las últimas jornadas, la región experimentó los combates más intensos desde la declaración del alto el fuego hace un mes. El viernes, los Emiratos Árabes Unidos reportaron que sus defensas aéreas interceptaron dos misiles balísticos y tres drones provenientes de Irán, ataque que provocó heridas moderadas a tres personas.

El Cuerpo de la Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica (CGRI) de Irán advirtió el sábado que responderá con represalias directas contra instalaciones estadounidenses en la región y buques identificados como enemigos si alguno de sus petroleros resulta atacado en el estrecho de Ormuz.
Desde el inicio de los ataques aéreos estadounidenses e israelíes a Irán, el 28 de febrero, Teherán restringió el paso de embarcaciones extranjeras por la zona marítima, una vía que antes de la guerra concentraba una quinta parte del flujo mundial de petróleo.
“Cualquier ataque contra petroleros y buques comerciales iraníes provocará una fuerte represalia contra uno de los centros estadounidenses en la región, así como contra los buques enemigos”, declaró el comandante de la marina del CGRI.
El comandante general Majid Mousavi señaló que “misiles y drones apuntan contra el enemigo y esperamos la orden de abrir fuego”, según declaraciones recogidas por la televisión pública Irib y la agencia Isna.
Además, el viernes se registraron choques esporádicos entre fuerzas iraníes y navíos estadounidenses en Ormuz, según señaló la agencia iraní Fars. Más tarde, la agencia Tasnim, vinculada al CGRI, citó a una fuente militar iraní que describió una situación de calma relativa.

El Comando Central de Estados Unidos informó que atacó a dos buques vinculados a Irán que intentaban ingresar a un puerto en territorio iraní. Un avión de combate estadounidense impactó las chimeneas de ambas embarcaciones, lo que forzó su retirada.
“Ya lo oyeron: tomamos nuestros tres destructores y los embestimos contra algunas cosas bastante grandes hoy y los dejamos en muy mal estado. Los destructores no sufrieron ningún daño. No sufrimos daños, pero nos disparaban y nosotros les disparábamos de vuelta, y nuestra potencia de fuego era muchísimo mayor que la suya y los dejaron en muy mal estado”, sostuvo el presidente estadounidense, Donald Trump, ante periodistas el viernes.
La presión internacional sobre Irán para frenar el conflicto creció a pocos días de la visita de Trump a China. Los mercados energéticos reaccionaron con incertidumbre ante la posibilidad de una escalada, que representa una amenaza para la economía global.
Durante más de dos meses de hostilidades, la zona del estrecho de Ormuz se convirtió en un punto estratégico, ya que cualquier alteración en la libre circulación de buques impacta directamente en el suministro energético internacional. El eventual acuerdo de paz propuesto por Estados Unidos busca cerrar formalmente la guerra y abrir la puerta a negociaciones sobre temas más complejos, incluido el programa nuclear iraní.
Por el momento, la expectativa se centra en la respuesta de Irán y la posibilidad de que los canales diplomáticos logren estabilizar la región, lo que permitiría la reapertura segura de una de las rutas marítimas más transitadas del mundo.
Corporate Events
INTERNACIONAL
Where Trump, GOP vs Democrats redistricting battle heads next in wake of key court rulings

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump and Republicans are hailing the blockbuster ruling by the Virginia Supreme Court to strike down the state’s congressional redistricting ballot measure, which was a major setback for Democrats in the battle for the U.S. House majority.
«Huge win for the Republican Party,» the president proclaimed in a social media post on Friday minutes after Virginia’s highest court struck down the referendum passed by voters last month.
The new map drawn by the Virginia legislature would have given Democrats four more left-leaning House districts in the Commonwealth ahead of this year’s midterm elections, when Republicans will be defending their razor-thin majority in the chamber.
The Virginia ruling, along with the recent opinion by the conservative majority on the Supreme Court to slash a key Voting Rights Act protection, is giving Trump and the GOP a major boost in their ongoing political fight with Democrats to redraw congressional district maps ahead of the midterms. At stake in this nationwide redistricting showdown is which party will control the House during the final two years of Trump’s second term in the White House.
BLOCKBUSTER RULING: VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN DEMOCRAT-BACKED CONGRESSIONAL MAP
The Virginia redistricting map that was approved narrowly by voters in a special election last month was struck down on Friday by the Virginia Supreme Court (Virginia Legislative Information System)
In Virginia, the decision means the map used in the 2024 elections will stay in place for the 2026 ballot box showdowns. Democrats currently control the state’s U.S. House delegation by a 6-5 margin. The now overturned map could have resulted in a 10-1 advantage for Democrats in the blue-leaning but competitive state.
In the wake of their latest legal setback, House Democratic Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York said, «We are exploring all options to overturn this shocking decision.»
And the House minority leader vowed, «No matter what it takes, House Democrats will win in November so we can help rescue this nation from the extremism being unleashed by Donald Trump and Republicans.»
But the 2026 redistricting wars are far from over, and the political landscape may get even rougher for Democrats going forward.
Here’s where things stand.
Louisiana
The Supreme Court’s decision reshaped the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act by ruling that race should not dictate the redrawing of legislative district maps. And the opinion specifically ruled that Louisiana’s congressional district map was unconstitutional.
Last week, the Supreme Court said that its decision declaring Louisiana’s map unconstitutional should go into effect immediately, breaking with its usual procedure of waiting roughly a month before its opinions become official.
That cleared the way for the GOP-controlled state legislature to begin the process of redrawing the map, and hearings got underway on Friday.

Republican Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana, right, a major ally of President Donald Trump, delayed his state’s U.S. House primaries as the GOP-dominated legislature redraws Louisiana’s congressional district map (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Republican Gov. Jeff Landry, a top Trump ally, took swift action in the immediate aftermath of the high court’s ruling, when he delayed the May 16 U.S. House primary elections in Louisiana.
Louisiana Republicans are aiming to erase one or both of the two Black-majority House seats, which are represented by Democrats.
Tennessee
Republicans in Tennessee moved even faster.
The GOP-dominated Tennessee legislature on Thursday quickly adopted a new map that would eliminate the only Democrat-controlled congressional district in the state, and would likely give Republicans control of all nine districts.
TENN GOV LEE CALLS SPECIAL SESSION TO REDRAW HOUSE MAP IN GOP’S FAVOR 9-0

Rep. Justin J. Pearson, D-Memphis, center, marches with protesters before a special session of the state legislature to redraw U.S. Congressional voting maps, in Nashville, Tenn., Tuesday, May 5, 2026. (George Walker IV/AP Photo)
GOP Gov. Bill Lee quickly signed the new maps into law.
Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen, who represents the majority Black district that’s being carved up, vowed legal action.
«Trump knows he HAS TO rig the game to keep his majority in November. And the TN GOP was willing to go along with it. It’s shameful,» Cohen wrote on social media. «Next stop is the courts.»
Alabama
Lawmakers in the Alabama legislature, where the GOP holds a supermajority in both chambers, are advancing legislation as they met this past week in a special session focused on redistricting. The new maps may result in eliminating one or both of the state’s two blue-leaning U.S. House districts.
The special session was called by Republican Gov. Kay Ivey.
But any new map passed by Alabama lawmakers will need to be greenlit by the Supreme Court. That’s because Alabama is currently prohibited by the high court from redistricting until 2030. It’s unclear if the court will lift its injunction.
Protests rocked both the Alabama and Tennessee legislatures as Republican lawmakers pushed forward the new maps.
South Carolina
In South Carolina, the GOP-controlled legislature returns in special session on Monday, as Republican lawmakers consider a new map that could put longtime Rep. Jim Clyburn, the only Democrat in the state’s seven-person House delegation, out of a job.
Georgia
Republicans in Georgia are divided over GOP Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia’s decision not to call state lawmakers back into a special session on redistricting.
The state’s primary is on May 19 and early voting is already underway in Georgia.
Florida
Meanwhile, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a bill passed last week by the GOP-dominated state legislature that redraws the red-leaning state’s congressional districts, adding four more right-leaning seats by eliminating districts currently controlled by Democrats.
Republicans currently control Florida’s U.S. House delegation by a 20-8 margin.
How we got here
The battle over the maps ignited last spring when Trump, aiming to prevent what happened during his first term in the White House when Democrats reclaimed the House majority in the 2018 midterms, first floated the idea of rare, but not unheard of, mid-decade congressional redistricting.
The mission was simple: redraw congressional district maps in red states to pad the GOP’s fragile House majority to keep control of the chamber in the midterms, when the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats.
When asked by reporters last summer about his plan to add Republican-leaning House seats across the country, the president said, «Texas will be the biggest one. And that’ll be five.»
Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas called a special session of the GOP-dominated state legislature to pass the new map.
But Democratic state lawmakers, who broke quorum for two weeks as they fled Texas in a bid to delay the passage of the redistricting bill, energized Democrats across the country. Among those leading the fight against Trump’s redistricting was Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California.
California voters in November overwhelmingly passed Proposition 50, a ballot initiative that temporarily sidetracked the left-leaning state’s nonpartisan redistricting commission and returned the power to draw the congressional maps to the Democratic-dominated legislature.
That led to five more Democratic-leaning congressional districts in California, which aimed to counter the move by Texas to redraw their maps.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an election night press conference at a California Democratic Party office in Sacramento on Nov. 4, 2025. (Godofredo A. Vásquez/AP Photo)
But the fight quickly spread beyond Texas and California.
Republican-controlled Missouri and Ohio and swing state North Carolina, where the GOP dominates the legislature, drew new maps as part of the president’s push.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
But in blows to Republicans, a Utah district judge late last year rejected a congressional district map drawn by the state’s GOP-dominated legislature and instead approved an alternate that will create a Democratic-leaning district ahead of the midterms.
And Republicans in Indiana’s Senate in December defied Trump, shooting down a redistricting bill that had passed the state House.
Facing the president’s wrath, five of those Republican state senators in Indiana were ousted by Trump-backed challengers in last week’s GOP primary.
midterm elections, congress, republicans elections, democrats, house of representatives, donald trump, elections
INTERNACIONAL
EN VIVO | Pakistán prometió continuar con sus esfuerzos de mediación para dar fin a la guerra en Medio Oriente

Estados Unidos e Irán mantienen en vilo a Medio Oriente mientras Washington aguarda por una respuesta a su propuesta entregada al régimen de Teherán con el objetivo principal de acordar un alto el fuego.
La finalización formal del conflicto, la resolución de la crisis en el estrecho de Ormuz y la apertura de un período de 30 días para negociaciones más amplias son los tres puntos centrales del acuerdo entregado por la administración del presidente Donald Trump a Irán.
Desde Teherán, el portavoz del Ministerio de Exteriores iraní, Ismail Bagaei, afirmó que la iniciativa estadounidense sigue en evaluación. “La propuesta está siendo estudiada y, una vez que lleguemos a una conclusión definitiva, sin duda la anunciaremos”, manifestó, según recogió la agencia Tasnim.
El secretario de Estado estadounidense, Marco Rubio, y el enviado especial para Medio Oriente, Steve Witkoff, mantuvieron una reunión el sábado en Miami con el primer ministro qatarí, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al Thani, para tratar la guerra en Irán, pero no se conocieron más detalles del encuentro.
En paralelo, las Fuerzas de Defensa de Israel (FDI) lanzaron un nuevo ataque contra más de 40 infraestructuras, en el cual eliminaron a más de 10 miembros del grupo terrorista Hezbollah en el sur del Líbano.
A continuación, la cobertura minuto a minuto:
El régimen de Teherán mantiene el bloqueo de internet desde el inicio de la guerra y ya se cumplieron 72 días
El bloqueo de internet en Irán entró este domingo en su día 72, y la conectividad sigue paralizada tras 1.704 horas, según informó el monitor de internet NetBlocks.
“Esta medida sin precedentes ya lleva tres meses en vigor sin indicios de una restauración más amplia, ya que las autoridades prohíben el acceso internacional al público en general”, agregó en una publicación en X.
Irán amenazó con dificultar el paso por el estrecho de Ormuz a países que apliquen sanciones de EEUU
“A partir de ahora, los países que sigan a Estados Unidos en la aplicación de sanciones contra la República Islámica de Irán se enfrentarán sin duda a problemas al atravesar el estrecho de Ormuz”, declaró el portavoz del Ejército iraní, el general de brigada Mohammad Akraminia, en una entrevista con la agencia IRNA
El jefe militar iraní advirtió que la nueva situación en el estrecho de Ormuz puede generar efectos económicos, políticos y de seguridad, e incluso contribuir a neutralizar las sanciones secundarias de Estados Unidos y parte de las sanciones primarias.
“Hoy ejercemos soberanía sobre el estrecho de Ormuz y cualquier embarcación que quiera atravesarlo deberá coordinar con nosotros”, afirmó..
Las fuerzas de la División 91 de las Fuerzas de Defensa de Israel (FDI) lanzaron una nueva ofensiva durante el fin de semana y atacaron más de 40 infraestructuras y eliminaron a más de 10 miembros del grupo terrorista Hezbollah en el sur del Líbano.
Estados Unidos espera una respuesta oficial de Irán a sus propuestas para poner fin a más de dos meses de enfrentamientos en Medio Oriente. El sábado, la actividad militar en la región disminuyó de manera considerable, dando paso a una jornada marcada por la expectativa y la cautela.
Irán amenazó con utilizar sus submarinos “listos para el ataque” en Ormuz
El comandante de la Armada iraní, Shahram Irani, informó el domingo que los submarinos ligeros de fabricación nacional están “listos para el ataque ” y operan en el estrecho de Ormuz en estado de alerta máxima, en respuesta a amenazas y necesidades operativas.
Irani afirmó que estos submarinos pueden permanecer en el lecho marino durante largos períodos y cuentan con capacidad para rastrear y destruir buques hostiles.
Pakistán prometió continuar con sus esfuerzos de mediación para dar fin a la guerra en Medio Oriente
El jefe del ejército paquistaní, Asim Munir, reiteró que Islamabad continuará impulsando sus esfuerzos de mediación entre Estados Unidos e Irán.
«Haremos todo lo posible para que la mediación tenga éxito y seguiremos haciéndolo”, afirmó Munir en un discurso público.
El jefe militar señaló que la aspiración de Pakistán es alcanzar una paz permanente en la guerra iniciada el 28 de febrero, conflicto que impactó a gran parte de la región.
Un buque granelero fue alcanzado por un proyectil cerca de Qatar
Un buque granelero fue alcanzado el domingo por un proyectil no identificado mientras navegaba a 23 millas náuticas al noreste de Doha, informó la Organización de Operaciones de Comercio Marítimo del Reino Unido (UKMTO). El impacto provocó un pequeño incendio, que fue extinguido posteriormente. El capitán del buque no reportó víctimas ni daños medioambientales.
Las autoridades investigan el origen del proyectil. La UKMTO recomendó a los buques que transitan por la zona que extremen las precauciones y reporten cualquier actividad sospechosa.
¿Qué contiene la última propuesta de alto el fuego de Estados Unidos?
Según Reuters, los últimos esfuerzos de paz entre Teherán y Washington buscan alcanzar un memorando de entendimiento para detener la guerra y restablecer el tráfico en el estrecho de Ormuz mientras se negocia un acuerdo más amplio.
El marco propuesto contempla tres etapas: la finalización formal del conflicto, la resolución de la crisis en el estrecho de Ormuz y la apertura de un período de 30 días para negociaciones más amplias.
Medios estadounidenses informaron que, según un plan de 14 puntos propuesto por Washington, Irán debería comprometerse a no desarrollar armas nucleares y a detener todo enriquecimiento de uranio durante al menos 12 años. Además, Irán entregaría aproximadamente 440 kg de uranio enriquecido al 60 por ciento.
A cambio, Estados Unidos levantaría gradualmente las sanciones, liberaría miles de millones de dólares en activos iraníes congelados y retiraría el bloqueo naval de los puertos iraníes. Ambas partes reabrirían el estrecho de Ormuz en un plazo de 30 días tras la firma del acuerdo.
Estados Unidos afirmó que el problema nuclear iraní debe resolverse “de una vez por todas”
El Departamento de Estado de Estados Unidos advirtió que el programa nuclear de Irán constituye una amenaza global e instó a Teherán a iniciar negociaciones serias con Washington para resolver la disputa.
“El programa nuclear de Irán representa una amenaza para Estados Unidos y para el mundo entero”, declaró un portavoz del Departamento de Estado a Fox News Digital.
A su vez, señaló que Irán incumple actualmente sus obligaciones en virtud del Tratado de No Proliferación Nuclear al no cooperar plenamente con el OIEA, y subrayó que los dirigentes iraníes “deben entablar negociaciones diplomáticas serias con Estados Unidos para resolver la cuestión nuclear de una vez por todas”.
Los resultados del ataque del Ejército israelí contra Hezbollah en Líbano durante su última ofensiva
International,Relations,Asia / Pacific,Diplomacy / Foreign Policy
POLITICA2 días agoManuel Adorni adelantó que no será candidato a jefe de Gobierno porteño en 2027: “No va a pasar”
ECONOMIA22 horas agoEl dólar subió en la primera semana de mayo y se acercó a los 1.400 pesos
INTERNACIONAL2 días agoEstados Unidos publicó los documentos oficiales sobre ovnis y otros objetos no identificados


















