Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Supreme Court begins new term with high-profile look at clean air and federal authority

Published

on



The Supreme Court launched its new term Monday with a blockbuster oral argument over whether federal or state laws and courts should handle civil lawsuits against energy companies for alleged climate change harms.

Eight justices debated for nearly two hours on a key gateway over environmental liability — who decides and where. It was unclear after the public session how the court might rule.

Advertisement

Absent was Justice Samuel Alito, who recused last week after calls to step aside because he owns stock in oil companies, but not the two at the center of Monday’s appeal.

Local and state governments seek civil damages totaling billions of dollars, arguing it is necessary to help pay for rebuilding after wildfires, rising sea levels, and severe storms worsened by fossil fuel pollution.

SUPREME COURT CAN RESTORE SANITY AND STOP THE LEFT’S RADICAL CLIMATE AGENDA

Advertisement

Colorado’s highest court let the case brought by Boulder County proceed.

SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH CHEVRON, OIL COMPANIES IN LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL LAWSUITS

The companies — backed by the Trump administration — counter emissions are a national issue that should be heard in federal court, where similar suits have been tossed out.

Advertisement

The justices will also decide whether they have jurisdiction to hear this dispute, or whether it belongs in state courts.

SUPREME COURT CLIMATE SHOWDOWN JOLTED BY ALITO’S LAST-MINUTE DECISION

Chief Justice John Roberts could be the deciding vote. He asked tough questions of both sides and his vote could produce a 4-4 tie with Alito not participating.

Advertisement

That would mean the specific lawsuit moves ahead in state courts. He said the court in the past has allowed similar claims to be decided outside the federal venue.

WAVE OF OVERLOOKED ‘LEFT-WING’ LAWSUITS COULD COME WITH AN UNEXPECTED PRICE TAG FOR AMERICANS

«There are a lot of familiar situations where conduct outside of the state has broad effects among other states, and yet we allow state courts in a particular state to bring litigation,» said Roberts. «I guess I’m not quite sure what makes this situation different from all those other ones, where we’ve allowed them to proceed in state court.»

Advertisement

Justice Elena Kagan compared the climate change lawsuits to previous claims against tobacco and opioid companies brought by states on behalf of their citizens.

THE SUPREME COURT IS BACK. THESE FIVE CASES COULD RESHAPE AMERICAN LIFE

«This is the same kind of lawsuit against the same kind of actors for the same kind of harm,» said Kagan. «Where does this principle come from, that states can’t regulate in the air and water space?»

Advertisement

But Justice Brett Kavanaugh seemed to speak for many of his conservative colleagues, on the implications for multi-jurisdictional lawsuits to play out, potentially for decades.

» It is going to bankrupt – if there are enough of these [lawsuits] — bankrupt these various defendants and certainly other defendants out there. Anyone is a potential defendant for a suit like this. Any manufacturer, any business,» suggested Kavanaugh.

«We don’t have to reinvent the wheel because we’ve said this multiple times,» he added, «and Congress, presumably, when doing the Clean Air Act and doing the Clean Air Act amendments, has relied on this Court’s precedents establishing that this kind of pollution is a federal law matter unless Congress speaks otherwise.»

Advertisement

The current litigation is part of dozens of lawsuits brought by states and municipalities across the country.

Boulder County, located north-west of Denver, sued in 2018.

Among the defendants is Suncor, a Canadian-based energy giant that operates the only major oil refinery in Colorado. ExxonMobil, the largest oil company in the U.S., is also a defendant.

Advertisement

Local officials claim the energy firms have misled the public about their role in climate change, and say financial penalties are necessary to mitigate ongoing harms in their communities, including recent forest fires and worsening air pollution.

Some states also accuse the current administration of rolling back mandated protections in the Clean Air Act and thereby abdicating their regulatory authority.

But the companies and the Trump Justice Department argue climate change should be addressed by the national government in federal court, and that the Clean Air Act limits what individual states and counties can do.

Advertisement

FOLLOW US ON X

They say this global problem is not limited to any one energy sector or country, and cannot be resolved by what they call local «power grabs.»

Some litigators believe the companies could fare better in federal court since they would not have to juggle dozens of ongoing lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions.

Advertisement

«Interstate air pollution is an inherently federal area,» Sarah Harris, a Justice Department lawyer, told the court. «This suit egregiously exceeds constitutional limits on state authority,» Harris told the justices.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE U.S. NEWS

With the possibility of an evenly divided court, the eight justices may not have to reach the merits of the federalism question.

Advertisement

GET BREAKING NEWS ALERTS

The Supreme Court specifically asked both parties to address at argument whether it should even hear the case, at least at this stage. That procedural «exit ramp» could put the larger issues off for another day.

«I understand that you have several other federal issues that you have raised that are still pending in the state court,» Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked the oil companies lawyer Kannon Shanmugam. «So why shouldn’t we wait and hear all of these claims once the state courts are done with their federal considerations?»

Advertisement

The case is Suncor Energy Inc. v. Commissioners of Boulder County, CO (25-170).

A decision is expected by next spring.

supreme court, us, supreme court oral arguments, climate, politics

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

El posible hallazgo médico que un grupo de especialistas detectó en tres cuadros de Rubens conservados en el Prado

Published

on



Una simulación por computadora descartó que la marca azul en el pecho izquierdo de Betsabé, en el famoso cuadro de Rembrandt, sea producto de un cáncer de mama, aunque el debate médico sobre la obra lleva más de cuatro décadas abierto y otras hipótesis todavía compiten por explicar la anomalía.

En 1983, los cirujanos P. A. Braithwaite y D. Shugg analizaron Betsabé con la carta del rey David —terminada por Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn en 1654 y conservada en el Museo del Louvre de París— y publicaron una hipótesis que cruzó el arte con la medicina: las alteraciones visibles en el pecho izquierdo de la figura femenina podrían ser compatibles con un cáncer de mama. La coloración azulada en la parte inferior del seno y una hinchazón perceptible bajo la axila izquierda fueron los elementos que sustentaron su lectura clínica.

Advertisement

Desde entonces, el cuadro se convirtió en un símbolo recurrente de la enfermedad y fue citado en publicaciones oncológicas de todo el mundo. La hipótesis ganó peso adicional por la identidad probable de la modelo: Hendrickje Stoffels, compañera del pintor, cuya representación corporal el artista habría tomado del natural con la minuciosidad característica del realismo barroco neerlandés.

Dos cirujanos australianos propusieron en 1983 que la figura de Betsabé en la obra de Rembrandt presentaba signos de cáncer de mama - (Photo by STRINGER / SOTHEBY'S / AFP)

Las simulaciones de la Universidad de Twente pusieron en duda la teoría del tumor

Investigadores del instituto MIRA de la Universidad de Twente decidieron someter la hipótesis a una prueba computacional. Simularon millones de fotones con distintas longitudes de onda que incidían sobre un pecho con tumor y analizaron cuántos regresaban y qué color percibiría el cerebro humano a partir de esa luz.

El proceso de cálculo demandó 700 horas de analisis mediante computadoras. El resultado fue concluyente: una coloración azul de esas características solo podría producirse si el tumor estuviera ubicado entre uno y tres milímetros bajo la superficie de la piel. En la práctica, los tumores mamarios se desarrollan a una profundidad considerablemente mayor, y a esas profundidades no generan alteración alguna del color superficial. Los investigadores concluyeron que era “muy improbable” que la pigmentación registrada por Rembrandt tuviera su origen en un carcinoma.

Advertisement

Otras enfermedades también fueron propuestas para explicar la anomalía

Antes de que la Universidad de Twente publicara sus simulaciones, otros especialistas ya habían cuestionado el diagnóstico de cáncer por razones clínicas. Hendrickje Stoffels sobrevivió casi diez años después de que se pintara el cuadro, una trayectoria difícil de conciliar con un cáncer avanzado sin ningún tipo de tratamiento eficaz disponible en el siglo XVII.

La supervivencia de Hendrickje Stoffels durante una década tras la creación del lienzo cuestionó la probabilidad de un tumor avanzado - (Wikimedia Commons)

En 2000, el oncólogo R. G. Bourne propuso como alternativa una mastitis tuberculosa o un absceso asociado a la lactancia. Otros investigadores señalaron una mastitis vinculada al embarazo. Y en 2020, el especialista vascular Paolo Zamboni planteó en su estudio la enfermedad de Mondor, una tromboflebitis superficial que afecta los vasos linfáticos y venosos de la mama y que sí podría generar una coloración visible en la superficie de la piel.

Rubens también plasmó signos similares en tres cuadros del Prado

El caso de Betsabé no es el único en la pintura barroca en el que los médicos han identificado posibles indicios de patología mamaria. Un artículo publicado en 2001 en Medicina Clínica por los investigadores Juan J. Grau, Miguel Prats y Matías Díaz-Padrón —este último del Museo del Prado de Madrid— analizó tres obras de Peter Paul Rubens conservadas en ese museo: Las tres Gracias, Orfeo y Eurídice y Diana y sus ninfas perseguidas por sátiros.

Advertisement

En Las tres Gracias, pintada hacia 1636, los autores describieron en la figura de la derecha una tumoración en el cuadrante superior externo del pecho izquierdo, con extensión hacia el hueco axilar, retracción del pezón y signos inflamatorios, elementos que consideraron compatibles con un cáncer localmente avanzado, estadio T4b o IIIb según la clasificación actual. Los investigadores destacaron que esa zona del cuadro, pintada sobre tabla, se conservaba en perfecto estado y que los restauradores no habían introducido cambios en el aspecto de la axila de la modelo.

Una simulación por computadora realizada en la Universidad de Twente descartó la hipótesis del tumor en la pintura - Autorretrato, óleo de 1659

El realismo barroco hace difícil separar el arte del testimonio

La polémica médica alrededor de estas obras está alimentada, en parte, por las propias convenciones estéticas del Barroco. Tanto Rubens como Rembrandt practicaban el realismo pictórico, una tradición en la que el artista buscaba reproducir con fidelidad lo que tenía ante sus ojos. Sus modelos eran personas reales, y sus cuerpos —con sus particularidades y asimetrías— quedaban registrados con una precisión que, siglos después, permite a los médicos especular sobre diagnósticos retroactivos.

Que Hendrickje Stoffels fuera realmente la modelo de Betsabé tampoco está confirmado con certeza absoluta, lo que introduce una variable adicional de incertidumbre. Lo que sí permanece es el debate: cuatro décadas después de que dos cirujanos australianos fijaran su mirada clínica sobre un lienzo del siglo XVII, la ciencia sigue sin cerrar el expediente.

Advertisement

auction,vertical

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Lula prepara su estrategia para enfrentar a Flávio Bolsonaro en el balotaje y apunta a aumentar la participación electoral

Published

on


El presidente de Brasil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, se enfrenta a un escenario adverso de cara a la segunda vuelta electoral, después de quedar detrás de Flávio Bolsonaro en los comicios de este domingo.

El mandatario se reunía este lunes en Brasilia con su equipo de campaña para empezar a diagramar una nueva estrategia, distinta de la que se implementó durante los últimos meses.

Advertisement

Lula ya anticipó el cambio de etapa frente a sus seguidores y allegados el domingo por la noche, en el hotel de San Pablo donde la dirigencia esperó los resultados. Allí reconoció que desde hoy comenzaba “una nueva campaña”.

Flávio Bolsonaro ganó la primera vuelta con 47,03% de los votos válidos, mientras que Lula obtuvo 45,16%. El balotaje está prevista para el próximo 25 de octubre.

“Las claves son dos: disputar la segunda vuelta con la premisa de cambiar para mejor y negativizar a Flávio, con foco en los cambios que hizo en el pasado su padre, Jair Bolsonaro, y la idea de un cambio para peor”, dijo a TN el analista brasileño Antonio Lavareda, presidente honorario de la Asociación Brasileña de Investigadores Electorales.

Advertisement

Elecciones en Brasil: la nueva estrategia de Lula para el balotaje

La nueva estrategia de Lula tendrá tres ejes centrales. En primer lugar, la campaña buscará confrontar de manera directa con Flávio Bolsonaro y establecer comparaciones entre los dos espacios políticos.

Lula busca su reelección. (Foto: Reuters)

El discurso del vicepresidente brasileño, Geraldo Alckmin, luego de conocerse los resultados, dio una muestra de la estrategia que podría desplegar el oficialismo durante las próximas semanas.

La intención será contrastar al lulismo con el bolsonarismo, incluso recuperando temas de la gestión del expresidente Jair Bolsonaro, como el manejo de la pandemia de coronavirus, y enfrentar esos antecedentes con las políticas implementadas por el actual Gobierno.

Advertisement

Bolsonaro

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Israeli medical workers who treated Oct 7 wounded relive day terror hit home

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As Israel marks three years since the Oct. 7, 2023 terrorist attacks, stories of bravery and self-sacrifice continue to emerge from within a nation grappling with recovery and rehabilitation.

Advertisement

For Nil Kirsht-Levi, the three years since the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, massacre have been defined by devastating personal loss, an agonizing wait for her sister who was taken hostage and brought to Gaza and an unwavering commitment to caring for fellow survivors of the cross-border terror attack.

Kirsht-Levi, a nurse with Israel’s largest healthcare provider, Clalit Southern District, who lives in Kibbutz Magen, spent the morning of Oct. 7 treating patients remotely from her safe room while trying to protect her three children as terrorists invaded the community and went from house to house. At the same time, she desperately texted her sister, Rimon Buchshtab-Kirsht, who lived with her husband in nearby Kibbutz Nirim.

FREED HOSTAGE ROM BRASLAVSKI DETAILS ABUSE, STARVATION DURING 738 DAYS IN GAZA CAPTIVITY

Advertisement

IDF forces outside Nil Kirscht’s home on the morning of Oct 8, 2023. Credit: Courtesy of the family. (Kirscht family)

«I lost more than 30 patients that day, more than 200 people I knew, and around 100 people I knew were kidnapped,» Kirsht-Levi told Fox News Digital. «I’m lucky to have a job that saves me, healthy children, a healthy husband. We work every day to recover and rehabilitate ourselves. Every day, we fall and get back up, but we are here — for ourselves, for others and we have won,» she continued.

«We should never forget, but we must move forward, live every moment and keep going. It’s a privilege to be alive,» she added.

Advertisement
Nil Kirsht-Levi

Nil reunites with her sister Rimon upon her return from captivity, December 4, 2023. (Nil Kirsht-Levi)

On Oct. 7, Kirsht-Levi’s sister sent a message saying she could hear Arabic and that terrorists had entered her home. Weeks of agonizing uncertainty followed before Kirsht-Levi saw her sister alive in a Hamas video. She had campaigned for her release and ultimately welcomed her home 53 days later, emaciated and covered in scars, as part of a ceasefire deal in November 2023.

Her sister’s husband, her brother-in-law, Yagev Buchshtab however, had been murdered by the terrorists.

During the 2023 Palestinian terror assault, launched on the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah, Michaela Koretsky, a midwife with Clalit’s Southern District, improvised lifesaving treatments for wounded members of Kibbutz Alumim.

Advertisement

Like so many others, Koretsky was jolted awake by air raid sirens at 6:29 a.m. that fateful day, as Hamas launched thousands of rockets at Israel, providing cover for terrorists as they crossed the border in the ensuing invasion. She rushed with her husband and children to the shelter, where she received a message from Eran, a member of the kibbutz’s civil defense squad, asking if she was home. Eran then began bringing wounded kibbutz members to her for first aid.

Michaela Koretsky

Michaela and her daughter hide in the safe room for hours on the morning of October 7, while she was tending to the wounded in her living room—and even saving one who was in critical condition.  (Courtesy of the Koretsky family)

ISRAELI OCTOBER 7 SURVIVORS CONQUER TRAUMA ALONGSIDE LEGENDARY ROCK ICONS IN POWERFUL NEW DOCUMENTARY

«When they entered the house carrying Amichai, he was covered in blood… I switched into nurse mode,» she said.

Advertisement

Koretsky had Amichai placed on the floor as they continued to hear gunfire outside the kitchen window. She improvised bandages and prepared an IV while staying in contact with an emergency room doctor from Soroka Medical Center who was also in the kibbutz. He confirmed that Amichai was stable.

Then Eyal was brought in. He had been shot, with one of the bullets lodged in his lung. After Koretsky placed him on an IV and administered additional oxygen, it became clear that he needed to be evacuated.

Hamas terrorists

Palestinian Hamas terrorists stand guard on the day of the handover of hostages held in Gaza since the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack, as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, Feb. 22, 2025. (Hatem Khaled/File Photo/Reuters)

«We needed to save lives, so I switched my brain into action mode and did what needed to be done. The whole time I did not think that the terrorists would enter my house. I knew one of my children was afraid they would figure out where the wounded were being taken and come after us, but I told myself, ‘I am protected. It will not happen,’» she told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

Her husband, Tzviki, accompanied by members of the kibbutz’s civil defense squad, reached his car and alone he evacuated the wounded under fire to Netivot, where they were transferred to waiting ambulances. From there, both Amichai and Eyal were taken to Soroka Medical Center for further treatment.

Prof. Shlomi Codish, director of the hospital in Beersheba, said he made three lifesaving decisions early on Oct. 7 that shaped the response throughout the day.

HAMAS USED SEXUAL VIOLENCE ‘DELIBERATELY AND SYSTEMATICALLY’ ON OCT 7, COMMISSION REPORT FINDS

Advertisement
Shlomi Codish

Prof. Shlomi Codish, the Director of Clalit-Soroka Medical Center on the day of the Iranian missile strike, June 2025.  (Clalit-Soroka Medical Center)

First, he and his team decided not to send the night shift home, allowing the hospital to begin the day with twice its normal staffing level. At 7:45 a.m., they declared a mass-casualty incident, despite not yet knowing how many wounded would arrive and alerted all available staff to report to the hospital. Finally, they ordered additional blood supplies in anticipation of the surge of casualties.

«We usually start the shift with 50 units of blood in our blood bank. By the end of the day, we had given 250 units. If we hadn’t ordered additional blood early that morning, we might have run out and people may have died,» Codish told Fox News Digital.

Codish said the hospital faced several overwhelming challenges throughout the day, beginning with the sheer number of wounded being brought to the hospital.

Advertisement

«In the first 24 hours, we received 674 wounded people. At the peak, we received more than 80 in a single hour, with an average of just 40 seconds between wounded people arriving,» he said.

«This was one of the largest mass-casualty events resulting from terror in human history. The hospital itself was also under fire, with dozens of incoming missile warnings from the Gaza Strip, while attacks were taking place simultaneously at a very large number of sites,» he added.

SIGN UP FOR ANTISEMITISM EXPOSED NEWSLETTER

Advertisement
Woman kneels by a memorial site

A woman reacts as the community of Kibbutz Kfar Aza commemorates their members who were killed, taken hostage and who died in captivity, following the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas terrorists, in Kibbutz Kfar Aza, southern Israel, Oct. 16, 2025. (Hannah McKay/Reuters)

The second challenge was the immediate impact of the invasion on hospital staff themselves. «Everyone who came in left a family at home that was potentially under attack. They got into their cars and drove through air-raid sirens in areas that weren’t protected, at significant personal risk, to come in and save lives,» he said.

Another major challenge was maintaining care inside the hospital as the number of casualties surged. The hospital began the day at full capacity, forcing staff to quickly free up intensive care beds and operating rooms for incoming patients. With roads around the hospital unsafe, transferring patients to other facilities was not an option in the first hours of the attack, while sending ambulances into the field risked exposing them to Hamas ambushes.

«When you see babies or children with direct injuries, that is not something you typically see on a battlefield. We saw elderly people with severe wounds inflicted directly, with no protection,» Codish said, reflecting on the brutality he witnessed that day.

Advertisement

«As a medical professional, what we saw was beyond words. Two babies suffering from dehydration after their parents were killed, simply waiting to be rescued — I defy anyone to find a word other than ‘evil’ to describe it,» he added.



anti semitism, israel, terrorism, hamas, conflicts

Continue Reading

Tendencias