Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Virginia school district faces probe over 9/11 teaching guide telling teachers not to ‘center the extremists’

Published

on



EXCLUSIVE: America First Legal (AFL) has launched an investigation into Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) in Virginia after Digital first exposed controversial guidance for teaching the 9/11 terrorist attacks, seeking to determine who was responsible for developing instructions that tell teachers not to «center the extremists or the acts of the extremists.»

The conservative legal group announced the investigation after Digital first reported on the FCPS guide ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attacks.

Advertisement

The district’s guidance tells teachers not to «associate the 9/11 attacks with Islam or Muslims» or «center the extremists or the acts of the extremists.»

LIBERAL VIRGINIA SCHOOL DISTRICT: DON’T LINK 9/11 TERROR ATTACKS TO ‘ISLAM or MUSLIMS’

«We wanna know where this comes from. We wanna know who the school is working with to develop these guidances,» America First Legal senior counsel Ian Prior told Digital.

Advertisement

Prior said AFL is seeking to examine how FCPS arrived at the guidance and whether any outside organizations participated in its development, but acknowledged AFL has not yet determined whether that occurred.

«We’re still seeking to determine how far this goes,» Prior said. «That’s why we’re investigating so that we can get to the bottom of it.»

The investigation was directly prompted by Digital’s reporting, Prior said.

Advertisement

CBC RELEASES POLICY CHANGE AFTER CONTROVERSY ABOUT REFUSING TO REFER TO 9/11 AS ‘TERRORIST ATTACKS’

«The reason why we’re investigating now is because this was just reported,» he said, adding that AFL saw the report «just like everybody else» and wanted to determine who FCPS was working with when the guidance was developed.

In announcing its investigation, AFL is accusing the school district of attempting to «sanitize history» and calling for «full transparency regarding who is responsible» for the guidance. The group’s announcement directs readers to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, though the two-page release itself does not detail the records sought.

Advertisement

The six-page FCPS guide, titled «25th Anniversary and Commemoration of 9/11,» was published Aug. 27 and edited Aug. 31. It directs teachers who choose to commemorate the attacks to carefully follow the district’s guidance and use only instructional resources available through the district’s Atlas site.

FCPS tells educators that lessons about the attacks can unintentionally stigmatize Muslim and Middle Eastern students and instructs teachers to prepare for anti-Muslim rhetoric, create «safe spaces» for Muslim and Middle Eastern students and challenge expressions of bias.

A GENERATION CANNOT REMEMBER 9/11. WE HAVE A DUTY TO MAKE SURE THEY LEARN

Advertisement

Fairfax County Public Schools did not directly answer Digital’s questions about who authored and approved the guidance, whether outside organizations were involved in its development or whether the district has made or considered changes to the document. The district referred Digital to a statement published on Sept. 11.

In that statement, Superintendent Michelle Reid said FCPS «unequivocally condemn[s]» the 9/11 terrorist attacks and emphasized the district’s connection to the Pentagon, military families, first responders and survivors.

The statement also said FCPS was «reviewing our materials» in response to community feedback, while maintaining that «the actions of terrorists should not define the entirety of any faith, culture, or community.»

Advertisement

FCPS’s Sept. 11 statement provides some information about how the materials were reviewed, but does not identify who authored the six-page guide or who approved its final language.

Prior argued that schools can teach students about the ideology that motivated the Sept. 11 terrorists without assigning collective responsibility to Muslims.

BROOKLYN TEACHERS WHO WITNESSED 9/11 AS CHILDREN REVEAL WHAT THEY WANT THE NEXT GENERATION TO REMEMBER

Advertisement

The district’s guidance similarly states that teachers should make clear that al Qaeda carried out the attacks, while drawing a distinction between the terrorist organization and Muslims as a whole.

«When discussing this topic with students, please make clear that the September 11 attacks were carried out by Al-Qaeda, a terrorist extremist organization,» the guide states. «Al-Qaeda’s ideology and actions should not be attributed to Islam or to Muslims as a religious community.»

The dispute centers in part on how much emphasis teachers should place on the terrorists and their ideology when commemorating the attacks.

Advertisement

FCPS tells teachers that «the commemoration of 9/11 focuses on those whose lives were lost and those who sacrificed to help others — not those who attacked the United States.» The guide encourages teachers to emphasize stories of «resilience, support, and resistance» and use age-appropriate details about the violence.

CBC CAVES ON 9/11 ‘TERRORISM’ GUIDANCE AS US, CANADIAN OFFICIALS UNLEASH CROSS-BORDER BACKLASH

For elementary students, the district suggests teachers could open by saying, «Twenty-five years ago today, there was an attack on the United States,» before allowing students’ questions to determine what additional information is shared at the teacher’s professional discretion.

Advertisement

Its suggested language for older students is considerably more specific, stating that «members of the extremist group al-Qaeda hijacked four planes in a coordinated terrorist attack on the United States» before recounting the 2,977 people killed, including civilians, military personnel at the Pentagon and emergency workers. The guidance also highlights the passengers and crew of Flight 93 who fought back against the hijackers.

FCPS said in the guide that its approach reflects the varied experiences of families in the Northern Virginia district, where some were personally affected by the attacks and the ensuing War on Terror.

«Many families of military personnel and first responders experienced loss and hardship,» the document states, while also saying Muslim families worry about harassment and hate crimes surrounding the anniversary.

Advertisement

AFL argues the district’s approach goes too far.

«Fairfax County Public Schools is attempting to sanitize history and erase the radical Islamic terrorism that struck our nation on September 11, 2001,» AFL counsel Will Scolinos said in announcing the investigation. «Parents and the public must have full transparency regarding who is responsible for stripping truth from our children’s classrooms.»

Prior said AFL has not determined what action could ultimately follow its investigation and that the group’s next steps will depend on what it finds.

Advertisement

Digital’s Asra Nomani contributed to this reporting.

virginia, september 11, education, culture opinion, controversies education, fox news investigates, politics

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

La ONU atribuye al régimen nicaragüense ocho muertes bajo custodia

Published

on



El régimen de Nicaragua es responsable de la muerte bajo custodia estatal de ocho personas detenidas por razones políticas desde 2018, entre ellas el exjefe militar Humberto Ortega y el dirigente indígena miskito Brooklyn Rivera, según un informe presentado este martes por el Grupo de Expertos en Derechos Humanos sobre Nicaragua ante el Consejo de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas.

El documento, titulado “Anatomía de la crueldad estatal”, sostiene que los hechos investigados podrían constituir crímenes de lesa humanidad. Los expertos identificaron posibles casos de encarcelamiento, tortura, desaparición forzada y persecución por motivos políticos.

Advertisement

El presidente del grupo, el alemán Jan-Michael Simon, afirmó que un Estado que recurre a desapariciones forzadas y permite muertes de personas bajo custodia incumple los estándares mínimos de derechos humanos exigidos para una gobernanza democrática.

El informe sitúa estas muertes dentro de un patrón de actuaciones atribuidas a instituciones estatales. Según el documento, existen fundamentos razonables para considerar que la Policía Nacional, el Sistema Penitenciario Nacional, el Ministerio del Interior y el poder judicial participaron de manera sistemática, deliberada y coordinada en esos abusos.

Los expertos señalaron que ese aparato institucional actuaría bajo el control centralizado de los codictadores de Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega y Rosario Murillo.

Advertisement

Nicaragua vive un estado de sitio de hecho. La policía reprime con violencia cualquier expresión opositora en la vía pública. (Cortesía La Prensa)

La muerte de Brooklyn Rivera bajo custodia

Una parte central del documento está dedicada a Brooklyn Rivera, líder indígena miskito y fundador del partido Yatama. Rivera permaneció detenido de forma arbitraria durante casi tres años, hasta que las autoridades comunicaron su muerte el 31 de mayo.

El integrante del grupo de expertos de la ONU Reed Brody afirmó que la dictadura nicaragüense primero privó de libertad a Rivera, después deterioró su salud y finalmente le quitó la vida. También cuestionó la explicación oficial sobre el fallecimiento del dirigente indígena.

Brody sostuvo que la versión ofrecida por las autoridades presenta inconsistencias. Añadió que las dudas se profundizaron por la negativa a permitir una autopsia independiente y por el entierro del cuerpo antes de que sus familiares pudieran despedirse.

Advertisement

El grupo de expertos instó a las autoridades a entregar los restos de Rivera a su familia y a la comunidad miskita. El informe plantea que ese procedimiento resulta necesario para garantizar el derecho de los allegados a conocer las circunstancias de la muerte y a realizar los ritos funerarios correspondientes.

Humberto Ortega, detenido en un hospital militar

El reporte también aborda el caso de Humberto Ortega, hermano del mandatario y exministro de Defensa, quien murió bajo custodia en un hospital militar en septiembre de 2024.

Los expertos indicaron que no lograron verificar las circunstancias exactas de su muerte. Aun así, manifestaron “serias preocupaciones” sobre la atención médica que recibió y sobre si esta fue oportuna y adecuada.

Advertisement

Humberto Ortega, antiguo jefe del Estado Mayor nicaragüense, había expresado críticas contra la dictadura de su hermano en sus últimos años. Antes de su fallecimiento permaneció detenido e incomunicado, una condición que el grupo considera susceptible de constituir trato cruel, inhumano o tortura.

Las otras seis personas mencionadas en el informe son Eddy Antonio Montes, Santos Sebastián Flores, Jorge Hugo Torres, José Modesto Solís, Mauricio Francisco Alonso y Carlos Cárdenas. Las ocho muertes bajo custodia fueron descritas como un resultado previsible de prácticas sostenidas por entidades del Estado.

Al menos 161 casos de desaparición forzada desde 2018

El informe de las Naciones Unidas también documentó que al menos 161 personas sufrieron desaparición forzada desde 2018 a manos de la dictadura. De ese total, 29 continuaban desaparecidas al momento de la presentación del documento.

Advertisement

Los expertos reclamaron que las autoridades revelen de inmediato el paradero de esas personas, liberen a todos los detenidos por motivos políticos e investiguen las muertes ocurridas bajo custodia estatal.

Además, pidieron a la comunidad internacional que adopte medidas para garantizar la rendición de cuentas por los abusos denunciados. Entre las opciones señaladas figura el uso de la jurisdicción penal universal, un mecanismo que permite investigar y juzgar determinados crímenes graves fuera del país donde fueron cometidos.

Nicaragua,Daniel Ortega,presos políticos,represión,derechos humanos,política,Centroamérica,bandera,cárcel

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Panamá destaca en congreso internacional el papel de la ciencia en la conservación de los océanos

Published

on



Panamá mantiene protegida el 54% de su superficie oceánica mediante 23 áreas marinas protegidas, mientras refuerza acciones para recuperar manglares, conservar especies y resguardar los ecosistemas costeros.

Estas medidas formaron parte del enfoque expuesto durante el XXI Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencias del Mar, COLACMAR 2026.

Advertisement

El encuentro reunió a investigadores, profesionales, estudiantes e instituciones de América Latina y el Caribe para intercambiar experiencias sobre el estudio, la conservación y la gestión sostenible de los océanos.

El ministro de Ambiente encargado, Óscar Vallarino, planteó que el conocimiento científico debe trascender los espacios académicos e incorporarse a la toma de decisiones públicas. Su planteamiento apuntó a convertir los estudios y los monitoreos en medidas aplicables a la conservación y restauración de los entornos marinos.

“El puente que queremos fortalecer desde el Ministerio de Ambiente es la ciencia que genere conocimiento, el conocimiento que oriente decisiones y las decisiones que se traduzcan en acciones reales de conservación”, afirmó Vallarino.

Advertisement

Encuentro reunió a investigadores, profesionales, estudiantes e instituciones de América Latina y el Caribe. (MiAmbiente)

La autoridad ambiental sostuvo que esa conexión resulta necesaria para definir medidas de conservación, protección y seguimiento de los ecosistemas marinos y costeros. El objetivo consiste en que las investigaciones contribuyan a responder a los desafíos que enfrentan los océanos.

También puso el foco en las especies migratorias, cuya protección depende de acuerdos entre los países por los que transitan. Estos animales se desplazan por aguas bajo jurisdicción de distintos Estados, por lo que requieren el intercambio de información y programas de vigilancia coordinados.

La cooperación regional, según expuso, debe involucrar a científicos, instituciones y autoridades ambientales. Los esfuerzos conjuntos permitirían ampliar el conocimiento disponible y fortalecer las estrategias de protección de las especies marinas.

Advertisement

El congreso incluyó simposios temáticos, conferencias magistrales, talleres especializados y sesiones destinadas a presentar investigaciones y experiencias. La programación buscó promover respuestas compartidas frente a las presiones sobre los ecosistemas oceánicos.

La participación de MiAmbiente como institución patrocinadora del evento reforzó el vínculo entre la producción científica y la gestión ambiental. El organismo acompañó un espacio regional orientado a trasladar el conocimiento técnico hacia iniciativas de conservación a escala nacional y latinoamericana.

Las acciones impulsadas durante el último año abarcaron la recuperación de manglares y la protección de ecosistemas marino-costeros. (MiAmbiente)

Las acciones impulsadas durante el último año abarcaron la recuperación de manglares y la protección de ecosistemas marino-costeros. La iniciativa forma parte de la estrategia panameña para preservar su biodiversidad y mantener la salud de sus océanos.

Advertisement

Recientemente se informó que Panamá invirtió $95.9 millones en distintos proyectos de ambiente, desarrollo sostenible y biodiversidad en el 2024, lo que equivale al 0.48% del presupuesto devengado del Sector Público No Financiero y al 0.1% del producto interno bruto (PIB).

Este financiamiento, identificado mediante el primer análisis del gasto público con impacto en ambiente y biodiversidad del país (BER), permitió apoyar la protección de áreas protegidas, la restauración de ecosistemas, la investigación científica y el uso sostenible de recursos naturales.

Estas actividades representan una inversión estratégica para Panamá, ya que contribuyen a conservar bosques, ríos y vida silvestre, al tiempo que protegen servicios esenciales como el suministro de agua, la producción de alimentos y la resiliencia frente a eventos climáticos.

Advertisement

En este marco, la Iniciativa de Finanzas para la Biodiversidad, implementada en Panamá desde 2025 por el Ministerio de Ambiente y el Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, busca mejorar la planificación, movilización y gestión del financiamiento para fortalecer la protección y el uso sostenible de los ecosistemas del país.

Esfuerzos conjuntos permitirían ampliar el conocimiento disponible y fortalecer las estrategias de protección de las especies marinas. (MiAmbiente)

El Programa de Saneamiento de Panamá (PSP), es un ejemplo de cómo aplicar esta iniciativa. Esta información fue presentada en un acto en el que se dieron a conocer otros dos estudios: uno sobre el marco institucional y de políticas, y otro sobre subsidios e incentivos.

Corresponsal:Desde Panamá

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

‘Big Sister’ warning resurfaces as Massachusetts expands home visits after Clancy trial

Published

on



Twenty-seven years before Massachusetts proposed to dramatically expand a taxpayer-funded program sending nurses into the homes of families with newborns, legendary conservative firebrand and grassroots women’s leader Phyllis Schlafly posed a question that her daughter says now sounds remarkably familiar.

«Are the American people willing to allow government agents to come into their homes to ‘advise’ them how to care for their babies?» Schlafly wrote in a March 1999 column titled, «Watch out for ‘Big Sister’ as Well as ‘Big Brother.’»

Advertisement

The warning resurfaced as Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey seeks $2 million to expand the state’s Welcome Family program, which offers nurse visits following childbirth. The program serves approximately 3,000 births annually, and the expansion is intended to make visits available following roughly 68,000 births statewide per year.

BLUE STATE GOV IGNITES ONLINE FIRESTORM WITH PLAN TO SEND GOV’T INTO HOMES OF NEWBORN BABIES: ‘LUNATIC LIBS’

The push comes in the aftermath of the Lindsay Clancy case, which put a searing spotlight on maternal mental illness. Clancy does not dispute that she killed her three young children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — inside their Duxbury home in 2023.

Advertisement

Clancy’s defense argued she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible, while prosecutors argued she knew her actions were wrong. The jury deadlocked, resulting in a mistrial.

For Anne Schlafly, chairman of Eagle Forum and Phyllis Schlafly’s daughter, her mother’s warning has now taken on new resonance.

«My mother was very prescient about the things that could happen if we let government intrude into our family lives,» Schlafly told Digital.

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TARGETS HEAD START BUREAUCRACY IN MOVE ADVOCATES SAY PUTS PARENTS IN THE DRIVER’S SEAT

«Her point was a government agent or an agent of the government has no business in your home, in your castle, snooping around and determining whether or not you’re raising the children the way the government wants you to raise the children,» she said. «After all, the home is our castle.»

Phyllis Schlafly’s 1999 column focused on Healthy Families America and similar home-visiting initiatives, warning about programs that screened families for risk factors, connected parents with health and social services and offered parenting guidance inside the home.

Advertisement

She also questioned whether programs officially described as «voluntary» would always operate that way in practice.

Massachusetts today describes Welcome Family as voluntary. Nurses assess the health of the «parents and caregivers» and newborn, answer questions about newborn care, screen for postpartum mental health concerns and connect families with additional services.

MICHIGAN LAWMAKER MOVES TO SHUT DOWN ‘GUARDRAIL-FREE’ CASH HANDOUT PROGRAM FOR NEW MOTHERS

Advertisement

Notably, Massachusetts lists «ensuring that your home is safe» among the subjects Welcome Family nurses may advise parents about, though the program’s family information page does not specify particular home safety criteria.

The state has called Welcome Family an «entry point into the system of care» for families with newborns. Healthy Families America, the program at the center of Schlafly’s 1999 column, is also among the models Massachusetts lists within its broader Home Visiting Initiative, though it is separate from Welcome Family.

Healey described her vision for the expansion in broader terms during an interview on Boston Public Radio.

Advertisement

«Everybody in the state, when you have a baby, you’re going to have a home visit within days, weeks, and that will be an opportunity for a healthcare provider to make an assessment to see if you need some additional support and resources,» Healey said.

FIERY VIEWS ON LINDSAY CLANCY AT WORK COULD GET YOU FIRED — AND BE PERFECTLY LEGAL, EMPLOYMENT LAWYER WARNS

Anne Schlafly questioned what meaningful consent looks like shortly after childbirth.

Advertisement

«Is it really voluntary if you don’t have true informed consent?» Schlafly said. «If you have just given birth, you’ve been in labor, you’ve been under sedation, can you really recognize what you were signing up for supposedly on a voluntary basis?

«I think mothers need to have the full disclosure that this would be a government agent in the home.»

The scale of the proposed expansion also concerns Schlafly.

Advertisement

«If government is going to expand their reach and hire a whole bunch of more people and use taxpayer money to send out all these agents to the families, I mean, that’s quite an expansion,» she said. «This idea of coming in to inspect and see what’s going on in your home smacks of Big Sister and Big Brother both.»

Massachusetts does not characterize the visits as inspections but as voluntary health and support services.

State officials point to results from the existing program. In 2025, Welcome Family offered 1,620 postpartum depression screenings, with 208 positive screenings. The state says every person who screened positively received a referral for services.

Advertisement

Schlafly said she does not object to families choosing to accept that help.

«If people want to have this help from Governor Healey, then they can avail themselves of it,» she said.

Her dividing line, she said, is whether parents retain the ability to refuse.

Advertisement

«I think any time you make it compulsory, the line has been crossed,» Schlafly said. «I would say the only way that this Massachusetts program could be acceptable is if the parents could opt out at any time.»

Massachusetts’ published materials describe participation as voluntary.

Digital reached out to Healey’s office for comment and clarification about parents’ ability to decline visits, information collected during visits and whether information may be shared with other state agencies.

Advertisement

Nearly three decades after her mother warned about «Big Sister» entering the family home, Schlafly said she believes she knows what her mother would tell Massachusetts parents today.

«There’s no doubt that Phyllis Schlafly would advise parents to reject busybodies who want to inspect their home,» she said. «The home is a sacred and private area, and Governor Healey has no business in the homes of Massachusetts parents.

«Let’s leave her to the state house and not the kitchen table.»

Advertisement

family personal freedoms, massachusetts, childrens health, family genres, politics, state and local

Continue Reading

Tendencias