Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Waltz delivers blunt warning to nations defying Iran sanctions, touts Greenland deal

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK: President Donald Trump will return to the United Nations this week seeking greater international cooperation in confronting Iran, even as his administration moves to reshape the global institution hosting world leaders, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview ahead of the gathering.

Advertisement

US presses allies to enforce Iran sanctions ahead of the UN General Assembly

With the U.S.-Iran war entering its seventh month, Trump is expected to address the General Assembly on Tuesday and meet Gulf leaders whose countries have been directly affected by the conflict.

The gathering comes as Washington seeks to intensify economic pressure on Tehran, European allies confront Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, and the administration faces questions about whether its push to reduce the U.N.’s size and spending risks diminishing the organization’s ability to respond to international crises.

BESSENT WARNS IRAN’S OUTSIDE BACKERS TO ‘STAY AWAY’ AS TRUMP SEEKS TO ‘ASPHYXIATE’ TEHRAN’S ECONOMY

Advertisement

President Donald Trump delivers a speech during the 80th session of the General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, Sept. 23, 2025. (Li Rui/Xinhua via Getty Images)

Waltz outlined what Washington expects from its partners on Iran: full enforcement of sanctions against Tehran, with consequences for countries that fail to comply.

«They will reinforce that message, but importantly, it’s all of these countries actually enforcing the sanctions and what they’re going to hear is there will be consequences for friend and foe,» Waltz said. «The president is doing this for the future security of the world.»

Advertisement

European and Asian allies have largely resisted Trump’s requests for assistance in the Iran conflict, which began with U.S. and Israeli strikes in February, Reuters reported on Sept. 18. The war has also disrupted energy markets, with Iran obstructing shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and its Houthi allies tightening their grip on a critical Red Sea shipping corridor.

Waltz said the administration intends to make sanctions enforcement a central part of its diplomatic push during UNGA.

Iranian soldiers parade during National Army Day in Tehran.

Members of Iran’s military parade during National Army Day on April 18, 2025, in Tehran. (Getty Images)

«The Iranian economy continues to crater,» Waltz said, pointing to the country’s currency, inflation and the U.S. naval blockade. «One way or another, the president has been crystal clear on our goals here that Iran cannot and will not have a nuclear weapon.»

Advertisement

His remarks follow a Sept. 17 U.N. Security Council vote in which Russia and China blocked an effort to continue independent monitoring of international sanctions on Iran.

Trump is also expected to meet Gulf leaders to discuss the conflict and regional security. Waltz said the administration wants to hear directly from its Gulf partners about their concerns, describing the collective meeting as an important diplomatic opportunity.

JEFF BARTOS SAYS UN REFORM IS NO LONGER AN ‘OXYMORON’ AFTER $570M IN CUTS

Advertisement
USUN Ambassador Mike Waltz

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Michael Waltz speaks at an emergency Security Council meeting on the situation in Iran on Feb. 28, 2026, in New York City. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

A UN the Trump administration wants to change — but not abandon

The Iran conflict is unfolding against a broader debate over the future of the United Nations, an institution Trump has repeatedly criticized and his administration has sought to substantially reform.

On Sept. 16, the United States paid $725 million toward the U.N.’s regular budget and another $102 million for peacekeeping operations. The payments reduced Washington’s outstanding debt and averted the immediate risk of losing its General Assembly voting rights in 2027. However, the U.S. still owed approximately $1.312 billion to the organization’s regular budget, according to the U.N.

Asked why American taxpayers should continue funding an organization the administration has repeatedly criticized for what it considers anti-American bias, Waltz pointed to efforts to reduce spending and redirect the institution toward its original mission.

Advertisement

«The president is clear about getting the U.N. back to basics and helping it realize its potential,» Waltz told Fox News Digital.

United Nations General Assembly

United Nations headquarters during the 80th General Assembly, in New York City, Sept. 23, 2025. (Reuters/Al Drago)

He said the administration had secured more than $1 billion in budget reductions, with roughly 3,000 headquarters positions being cut and a reduction of approximately 25% in peacekeeping personnel.

«We have the U.N. on a diet,» Waltz said.

Advertisement

But Waltz also made clear that the administration does not intend to abandon the United Nations.

«There’s got to be one place in the world where everyone can come together and put diplomacy first and can actually talk,» he said. «We don’t ever want to see a U.N. in Beijing or Moscow or Brussels.»

«If we just walked away, you’d have 192 countries talking without us,» Waltz added.

Advertisement

Gaza offers one example of how the administration intends to use the U.N. while limiting direct American military involvement. Waltz pointed to the U.N.-endorsed Board of Peace and the planned International Stabilization Force, which is intended to support security and a postwar transition in Gaza. The ambassador said he does not want American troops deployed there, arguing that international security operations should allow other countries to share the burden. The U.N. Security Council endorsed the Gaza peace plan and authorized the stabilization force in November 2025.

The State Department said Sept. 18 that Secretary of State Marco Rubio will be in New York from Sept. 20–23 to meet foreign counterparts, advance U.S. security and economic priorities and continue the administration’s campaign for U.N. reform.

WALTZ CALLS OUT IRANIAN DIPLOMAT AT UN FOLLOWING DRONE STRIKES ON BAHRAIN AND KUWAIT

Advertisement
Small cruise ship sails through Prince Christian Sound, Greenland.

Denmark and Greenland have stressed that the new arrangement will not compromise the island’s sovereignty or right to self-determination. (iStock)

Greenland agreement adds another dimension to allied diplomacy

Trump arrives in New York days after announcing a new security agreement with Denmark and Greenland aimed at expanding the American military presence in the Arctic while restricting adversaries from establishing bases or making sensitive investments on the island.

The agreement falls short of Trump’s earlier ambition to acquire Greenland, which remains an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. Denmark and Greenland have stressed that the arrangement will not compromise the island’s sovereignty or right to self-determination. Additional details of the agreement have yet to be made public.

Waltz told Fox News Digital that the deal reflects the Arctic’s growing strategic importance as melting ice opens new shipping routes and increases access to energy and mineral resources.

Advertisement

«It’s incredibly significant,» Waltz said, pointing to Russia’s Arctic military capabilities and the potential for new shipping routes to transform global trade.

«It took some tough tweets, maybe some tough language,» he said. «We now have an agreement with our ally Denmark.»

The agreement comes as European governments confront overlapping security challenges involving Russia’s war in Ukraine, Arctic defense and uncertainty over transatlantic security arrangements, while Washington seeks greater allied cooperation in its campaign against Iran.

Advertisement

TRUMP ARRIVES AT NATO SUMMIT AS IRAN RIFT LOOMS ABOVE ALLIANCE TALKS

President Trump with UN Secretary General Guterres.

President Donald Trump meets with U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres during the 80th session of the General Assembly on Sept. 23, 2025 in New York City. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

World leaders converge on New York

The U.N. expects 73 heads of state and 45 heads of government, along with 49 ministers, 11 vice presidents and one crown prince, to attend High-Level Week, U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric told reporters Friday.

Member states have submitted approximately 1,000 requests for bilateral meetings, while about 168 events are scheduled alongside the official proceedings.

Advertisement

The 81st General Assembly’s General Debate begins Tuesday and runs through Sept. 28.

Beyond Iran, world leaders are expected to address Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the future of Gaza, international security and the U.N.’s ability to respond to emerging global challenges.

Waltz described the administration’s approach with a slogan inspired by the president’s political branding: «Make the U.N. great again.»

Advertisement
Mike Waltz

Ambassador Mike Waltz speaks during a Security Council meeting, after the U.S. and Israel launched strikes on Iran, at U.N. headquarters in New York City, Feb. 28, 2026. (Heather Khalifa/Reuters)

But the immediate diplomatic questions facing Washington are more concrete: whether allies will increase pressure on Iran, whether Gulf leaders can agree on a path toward ending the conflict and whether the administration’s push for a leaner U.N. can coexist with its efforts to use the organization to address international security challenges.



war with iran, united nations, donald trump, foreign affairs, greenland

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

‘Puntos de Vista’ reúne ternura, ironía y crítica en cuentos narrados por gatos, libros y una inteligencia artificial

Published

on



Nos suelen preguntar los lectores, avezados o no, por el modo en que se construyen nuestros textos. La cocina literaria… En 1999, en Los muros -mi primer libro de cuentos- , incluí un relato titulado “Etcétera” en el que una receta de cocina inventada y realizable dialogaba consigo misma y con los avatares vitales de la narradora, en busca de libertades. Entonces podía decirse que yo (no hay que confundir autor con narradora ni narratario) buscaba invertir el sentido clásico y conservador atribuido en la época a la mujer, en esencia ama de casa perfecta según un punto de vista meramente reproductivo, aun tratándose de profesionales o trabajadoras…

En 2026 en Puntos de Vista, una receta en lugar de relato, presta la función de epígrafe para la historia con un dejo de ironía anticipatorio. La protagonista espera con sus hijos a un marido que se retrasa en un vuelo para celebrar después, en familia, la Nochebuena. Como en 1999, las recetas escapan de su mera significación doméstica aunque conservan instrucciones culinarias realizables. Generosidad no compartida con las circunstancias que sufre la protagonista que prepara el plato en tanto, en efecto, “Vitello Tonnato”, que forma parte de mi último libro que publica Leviatán, contiene en sus inicios una receta que incluye sarcasmos y si bien alude a la forma en que yo misma cocino esta comida, sobre todo consumida en tiempos navideños, no será apreciada en la Nochebuena del cuento, de pocos aires celebratorios.

Advertisement

El libro, sin embargo, no ofrece miradas solo femeninas. Hay varones protagonistas que opinan rabiosos e ironizan; cosas, libros, animales.

Yendo a la cocina literaria me gustaría advertir que no hay en los inicios de Puntos de vista, ni en ninguno de mis textos, un orden creativo estratégico y anticipatorio. Esto es: no diseño el texto sino que este se me aparece y se escribe casi al correr del teclado, si bien es cierto que de inmediato intento controlar cómo y hacia dónde va la historia y cuidar de los personajes. Puntos de Vista reúne cuentos, relatos, viñetas y un poema, y debí ceñirme a mi primigenia idea al concebirlo: demostrar que la libertad creadora posee como único límite la coherencia, cierta belleza, una suerte de moral intrínseca. No hay literatura sin microclimas aun cuando se describan realidades y hablen personajes a su configurado entender. A menudo, uno de esos personajes nos tira a los escritores de las narices, nos elige.

La escritora Paula Winkler (Imagen Ilustrativa Infobae)

Para ejemplificar, en “La Señora Prentiss y el ratón Pérez”, me inspiré en el gato Beppo de Jorge Luis Borges y en esas personas que tratan a los seres sintientes no humanos como mascotas, sin tener en cuenta su autonomía, personificándolos, humanizándolos. Luego, recordé a Prentiss, personaje de una de mis novelas –“El marido americano” – y recurrí al legendario ratón Pérez como contrapunto. “La rotonda de Paratombú” es, en Santiago y en las Termas de Río Hondo, el refugio de perros callejeros atraídos por las luces del turismo y de la capital de provincia pero librados a su suerte. “Sueños” es contado por un joven cuya precaria vida no le impide imaginar, imaginación que abunda en poetas, novelistas y narradores, y que si bien no modifica la existencia, la repara, la acaricia… “Puntos de vista” alude a los estragos subjetivos de la Alemania de la Segunda Guerra y de la postguerra y “Sobriedad sonora” pone en el tapete la mirada escéptica sobre el mundo, que a veces me habita. Asimismo, en “Ora (lege) et labora”, un burócrata devela su presunta “creatividad”, al mismo tiempo el hecho de que, a menudo, la pirámide concebida para ofrecer supuestos servicios al ciudadano de a pie ralentiza sus objetivos declarados en apariencia, pero incumplidos en lo real atento a desplazamientos egoístas personales, volviendo a esas administraciones auténticos obstáculos kafkianos.

Advertisement

La construcción de un texto con unidad temática no fue fácil porque se reúnen aquí distintas opiniones y argumentos. Hay ironía, crítica, pero también ternura, amorosidad y esperanza. Sin embargo, la confección de narradores singulares, como un gato, libros que dialogan entre sí para sobrevivir en una biblioteca próxima a ser renovada por su dueño debido a una mudanza, mujeres de vida banal y un narrador omnisciente que discute con la IA y la desafía, tales narradores seleccionados, vierten aquello que buceo en el proceso humano mismo de significación: atribuimos sentido a significantes metaforizados por otros, damos por sentado el significado de situaciones que no deberían naturalizarse y sí, repensarse; repetimos discursos, nos deslumbramos de lo ajeno sin pensar, alardeando de lo propio.

Decía William James, el hermano del novelista, que hay gente que cree que piensa cuando solo ahonda en sus prejuicios. Prejuzgar constituye un alerta válido si es indicial: veo fuego, prejuzgo que hay peligro y, en consecuencia, llamo a los bomberos, aviso a los demás y huimos del lugar. En el orden de las ideas y del pensamiento, habría que tener cuidado de que gatos no pasen por liebres. Este libro no trata de añoradas liebres ni pícaros gatos y carece de mensaje. Los lectores sacarán sus conclusiones, en tanto aquí hay modos de ver desplazados en situaciones, cosas, en animales, a los que les atribuyo algún misterio. Mi escritura se va haciendo, siempre desnuda, entre puentes. Digo “desnuda” porque los textos nacen y se desenvuelven con la intervención lógica del autor pero se independizan no bien impresos: pertenecen a los lectores que los eligen o bien, los textos a ellos.

La lectora exigente que hay en mí cuando reviso me obliga a corregir y cambiar los muchos borradores que requiere cada escrito. Trabajan mi cuerpo, mis emociones, mi cerebro y el subconsciente. Como decía Roberto Bolaño, “tener el valor, sabiendo previamente que vas a ser derrotado y salir a pelear, eso es la literatura”, y esta, precisamente, es mi sensación (y son mis fantasmas) cuando termino un texto y lo doy a conocer.

Advertisement

Ustedes dirán…

Paula Winkler,Puntos de vista,Editorial Leviatán,libro,portada

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Fox News/NORC Study: Voters look to 2028 focused on the economy

Published

on



After the midterm elections, attention will turn to the 2028 race for the White House. What is on voters’ minds as they look ahead to the next presidential election?

Most Republicans want the next president to follow President Donald Trump’s policies, if not his style. Nearly 4 in 10 MAGA Republicans want Trump’s successor to emulate both, and about half want the next president to follow his policies alone. Non-MAGA Republicans are less enthusiastic: 45% want his policies to continue, but only about 15% of non-MAGA Republicans want a president with the same style.

Advertisement

Independents prefer something entirely different: 6 in 10 want the next president to break with both Trump’s policies and his style. Likewise, few Democrats want to see either his style or his policies repeated.

Even as the Democrats have won control of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and Trump finds his approval rating at 39%, a bloc of voters remains loyal to the president and is likely to influence the 2028 campaign. While half of voters want a successor who does not emulate his style or follow his policies, 26% want a president who will carry on his policies, and another 12% want the next president to copy his policies and his style.

VOTER POLL: 2026 MIDTERM ELECTIONS USHER IN A BLUE WAVE AS DEMOCRATS WIN CONTROL OF CONGRESS

Advertisement

Looking ahead, voters across party lines say improving economic conditions is the most important issue for the country to address over the next five years. Six in 10 voters feel they are holding steady financially while about 3 in 10 feel they are falling behind. Few, about 1 in 10 voters, feel they are getting ahead financially. Voters who describe their own financial situation as less than satisfactory, or say they are falling behind, are more likely to name the economy as the top issue.

What should Tuesday’s winners prioritize once sworn into office? When asked what is most important for newly elected officials to work on first in 2027, 3 in 10 voters want elected officials to address grocery costs. About 2 in 10 want action on gas prices, and a similar share say they should work on healthcare and prescription drug costs.

Slightly fewer are concerned about housing costs, while about 1 in 10 want officials to address electricity and other utility costs.

Advertisement

Voters are closely divided on whether the country can look forward to better days or if the good days are behind us. And it’s linked to how they’re feeling financially. About two-thirds of those who say they are getting ahead financially are optimistic about the future. However, about two-thirds of voters who are falling behind financially think the country’s best days are in the past.

Beyond the economy, priorities diverge. About 1 in 5 Democrats point to access to affordable healthcare, while about a similar share of Republicans say protecting individuals from government overreach is the top issue. About 1 in 10 independents say the country should address the affordability of healthcare, and about the same share say government overreach.

Voters are divided over AI’s effect on the U.S. economy during the next 10 years. About 4 in 10 say it will be harmful, while 3 in 10 expect benefits. About 1 in 10 expect AI to make no difference, while slightly more, about 2 in 10, are unsure. About 4 in 10 expect AI to negatively affect the environment and the arts and entertainment industry.

Advertisement

About half of voters want substantial changes in how the country is run. Party identification shapes how much change voters want and which branches of government they think most need reform. Democrats are about three times as likely as Republicans to want complete upheaval of how the country is run. Half of democratic socialists favor complete and total upheaval, compared with about 1 in 10 MAGA Republicans.

In the 2024 Voter Analysis conducted for the presidential election, most Republican voters said they wanted substantial change or total upheaval. Now, with a Republican in the White House and their party controlling both houses of Congress, they are less eager for major change.

VOTER POLL: HOW DEMOCRATS TOOK CONTROL OF THE SENATE

Advertisement

Overall, 4 in 10 voters think Congress should be substantially reformed, including three-quarters of MAGA Republicans and half of non-MAGA Republicans. Democrats are less likely to say Congress needs reform, but half say the executive branch should be improved. Few voters in either party want changes to the Constitution. Democrats are more likely than Republicans or independents to say the Supreme Court needs reform.

Voters across party lines support term limits for Congress and Supreme Court justices. Democrats favor abolishing the Electoral College, but Republicans and independents are less enthusiastic. Most Republicans support limiting mail voting to people physically unable to vote in person. MAGA Republicans are more supportive of limiting mail voting than non-MAGA Republicans (63% vs 40%). Democrats oppose the idea, regardless of whether they support the Democratic Socialists of America.

AMERICANS CLASH OVER SUPREME COURT EXPANSION AS FIGHT OVER 9 JUSTICES HEATS UP: ‘LET’S PACK IT NOW’

Advertisement

The expansion of artificial intelligence has triggered some public backlash against AI data centers. Voters are divided on whether AI will help or hurt during the next 10 years. More Democrats say the technology will be harmful while more Republicans expect benefits.

Among Republican voters, MAGA Republicans are more enthusiastic about AI than non-MAGA Republicans. Forty-five percent of MAGA Republicans believe AI will help the U.S. to compete with other countries, and another 4 in 10 feel AI will do more to help the economy.

Among Democrat voters, supporters of democratic socialism and those who do not support the movement are similarly likely to feel AI will help aspects of American society. However, supporters of democratic socialism are more likely than other Democrats to feel AI will do more to hurt than help.

Advertisement

Overall, 6 in 10 voters are extremely or very concerned about the effect of data centers on the price of utilities in the communities where they are being built. About half are concerned about the effect of data centers on pollution of natural resources, land development or the health of the local population, regardless of whether they live near a data center. Democrats are more concerned about the effects of data centers than Republican voters, again, regardless of their proximity to the facilities.

Voters across party lines support requiring companies to pay for electric grid upgrades needed for their data centers, increasing government regulation of AI, and limiting AI in schools. Most Democrats and independents oppose building a data center in their community. Most voters also oppose local construction, whether their county already has a data center.

AMERICA’S MULTI-BILLION TECH BOOM COMES INTO FOCUS AS 7 KEY STATES PUT IT TO A MIDTERM TEST

Advertisement

The economy is a top issue for most voters, yet 4 in 10 say they could support a candidate whose economic views differ from their own.

After the economy and jobs, nearly 6 in 10 voters see healthcare as an important issue, and about 6 in 10 would not support a candidate who disagrees with them on healthcare policy. About half could not back a candidate whose views on Israel and the Palestinians differ from theirs. Overall, about 6 in 10 say they could never support a candidate they disagree with on abortion, guns, or immigration.

Explore the results here: https://civichealth.norc.org/crosstabs.html

Advertisement

The NORC Civic Health & Elections Project (CH&EP) is a national survey of registered voters conducted Oct. 26 through Nov. 3, 2026, with 113,020 interviews. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. The margin of sampling error for the national sample, including the design effect, was ±0.5 percentage points for voters and ±1.2 percentage points for nonvoters. Margins of sampling error for individual states and subgroups vary based on sample size.

politics, polls, donald trump, republicans elections, economy, midterm elections

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Crisis bancaria en Paraguay: pidieron el juicio político contra Santiago Peña y la Policía reprimió las protestas

Published

on


Diputados opositores de Paraguay presentaron este miércoles ante el Congreso un pedido de juicio político para destituir al presidente Santiago Peña y al vicepresidente Pedro Alliana, en medio de una crisis bancaria que dejó a unos tres millones de personas con sus depósitos congelados. La iniciativa provocó una nueva escalada de tensión política, mientras cientos de manifestantes salieron a las calles de Asunción para reclamar la devolución de su dinero y se enfrentaron con la Policía, que utilizó gases lacrimógenos y camiones hidrantes para dispersarlos.

La presentación fue impulsada por legisladores opositores y disidentes del oficialismo, después de que el Banco Central de Paraguay interviniera Ueno Bank, una de las mayores entidades financieras del país, por insuficiencia de capital.

Advertisement

El diputado Mauricio Espínola, oficialista disidente, confirmó a la agencia AFP que el pedido de destitución reunió las firmas necesarias para ser tratado en la Cámara de Diputados. La sesión fue convocada para este jueves a las 10 (hora local).

La acusación presentada ante el Congreso solicita iniciar un juicio político contra Peña por “el mal desempeño de sus funciones en el ejercicio del cargo”. El mandatario también enfrenta cuestionamientos por un presunto conflicto de intereses y por el aumento de su patrimonio.

El presidente paraguayo, Santiago Peña (Foto: EFE)

Peña había tenido acciones de un grupo empresarial que controlaba Ueno Bank, aunque se desvinculó de esa participación en 2025.

Advertisement

La crisis estalló el martes, cuando el Banco Central decidió intervenir la entidad y suspender sus servicios. Casi la mitad de los 6,4 millones de habitantes de Paraguay tienen cuentas en ese banco.

El escándalo también provocó la renuncia del presidente del Banco Central, Carlos Carvallo, y derivó en la detención de ocho directivos de Ueno Bank, entre ellos su presidente, Miguel Vázquez, después de una denuncia presentada por el organismo regulador ante la Justicia.

Incidentes en Paraguay: la Policía reprimió las protestas por los depósitos congelados

Cientos de personas volvieron a manifestarse este miércoles por segunda noche consecutiva en Asunción, donde reclamaron la devolución de sus ahorros y exigieron la salida del presidente.

Advertisement

“Devuelvan nuestra plata” y “juicio a Santi Peña” fueron algunas de las consignas que se escucharon durante la movilización, según constató la agencia AFP.

La protesta derivó en enfrentamientos entre manifestantes y efectivos policiales, que intentaron dispersar a la multitud mediante camiones hidrantes y gases lacrimógenos. Pese al operativo, numerosas personas continuaron con la movilización.

Una persona fotografía el aviso del Banco Central de Paraguay sobre la intervención a Ueno Bank en Asunción (Foto: EFE/ Juan Pablo Pino)
Una persona fotografía el aviso del Banco Central de Paraguay sobre la intervención a Ueno Bank en Asunción (Foto: EFE/ Juan Pablo Pino)

Más temprano, se habían registrado largas filas frente a las sucursales de Ueno Bank, donde los clientes intentaban recuperar su dinero.

“Es el dinero de nuestra jubilación que ahora no sabemos si lo vamos a cobrar”, expresó a la AFP Teresa Montiel, una médica de 50 años que participó de la protesta con una pancarta que decía “unidos somos más fuertes”.

Advertisement

El martes, otro de los afectados, Marcelino Vergara, de 68 años, había relatado entre lágrimas la situación que atravesaba tras el congelamiento de sus depósitos.

“Perdí los ahorros de toda mi vida, solo tengo 8.000 guaraníes (casi un dólar). Todos deben ir presos”, denunció.

Ante la magnitud de la crisis, el Gobierno paraguayo anunció un mecanismo para devolver una parte de los depósitos congelados.

Advertisement

Peña promulgó este miércoles una ley aprobada rápidamente por el Congreso que, según explicó, “permitirá a los ahorristas cobrar en el menor tiempo posible una parte de los fondos de garantía a fin de que los recursos vuelvan a las manos de quienes corresponde”.

La norma establece que los pagos deberán realizarse en los próximos cinco días.

El Banco Central precisó que los afectados recibirán un primer desembolso de hasta 10 millones de guaraníes, equivalentes a unos 1675 dólares.

Advertisement

Qué puede pasar con Santiago Peña tras el pedido de destitución en el Congreso

El futuro del presidente paraguayo dependerá de las negociaciones parlamentarias y, especialmente, de la posición que adopten los legisladores del Partido Colorado.

La oposición necesita conseguir el respaldo de una parte del oficialismo para avanzar con el juicio político, ya que el partido gobernante tiene mayoría propia tanto en Diputados como en el Senado.

Si la Cámara baja aprueba la acusación, el procedimiento pasará al Senado, que será el encargado de desarrollar el juicio.

Advertisement

Para concretar la destitución de Peña y Alliana, se necesitarán al menos 30 votos de los 45 senadores.

Sin embargo, la posibilidad de alcanzar esa mayoría es incierta. Aunque el Partido Colorado controla ambas cámaras, existen diferencias internas y su presidente, el exmandatario Horacio Cartes, está distanciado del Gobierno.

Los legisladores que impulsan el juicio político acusan a Peña de haber tomado “decisiones regulatorias presuntamente favorables a Ueno Bank” y cuestionan la concentración de fondos previsionales en la entidad, debido a sus anteriores vínculos comerciales con el grupo que la controlaba.

Advertisement

Paraguay tiene un antecedente de destitución presidencial mediante un juicio político. En 2012, el Congreso removió del cargo a Fernando Lugo tras una masacre que dejó 11 campesinos y seis policías muertos.

BANCOS

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias