Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Could Trump revoke Ilhan Omar’s citizenship for alleged brother marriage? Ex federal prosecutor breaks it down

Published

on



The Trump administration’s recent effort to bring the law down on Rep. Ilhan Omar could go as far as seeking to strip the Minnesota congresswoman of her citizenship for alleged immigration fraud. But a criminal investigation is unlikely to yield results the president wants, according to a former federal prosecutor.

Michael Wildes, an immigration attorney, told Digital that investigators face a «very high bar» to build a case against Omar after White House border czar Tom Homan confirmed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is conducting a «criminal» investigation against the progressive squad member.

Advertisement

It all stems from claims that Omar married her brother to gain U.S. citizenship, which she has repeatedly denied.

President Donald Trump has a longstanding feud with Omar going back to when she was first elected in the middle of his first term, and quickly became one of his most vocal critics in Congress. Trump has repeatedly called for Omar to be sent back to Somalia because of her alleged fraudulent activity.

The Trump administration continues to ramp up efforts to denaturalize and deport individuals accused of immigration fraud. And Vice President JD Vance claimed earlier this year that the Department of Justice is investigating Omar for alleged fraud and immigration violations.

Advertisement

But questions remain over what a potential prosecution and denaturalization case against the Somali-born lawmaker would require.

Wildes said that investigators would need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Omar knowingly entered her marriage — to a man critics allege is her brother — for the sole purpose of evading U.S. immigration laws.

DOJ MOVES TO STRIP CITIZENSHIP FROM 17 PEOPLE ACCUSED OF HIDING DISTURBING CRIMES

Advertisement

«In order to establish a successful marriage fraud case, the government would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt… that the defendant knowingly entered into a marriage with the primary purpose to evade immigration laws and get a benefit,» Wildes said.

Wildes noted that even if Omar and her husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, decided after getting married that their partnership could be a scheme for Elmi to fast pass America’s immigration process, this would not be considered marriage fraud in court.

He continued, «Those are very high bars and thresholds that they would have to surmount. The immigration benefit cannot be a byproduct, or secondary consideration. This is not deemed to be illegal.»

Advertisement

If evidence was presented to prove Omar and Elmi committed marriage fraud, the Minnesota Democrat could face up to five years in jail, a maximum fine of $250,000, or both.

Wildes also pointed out that there are statutes of limitation that could hinder a potential prosecution and make it more difficult to prosecute Omar for marriage fraud, as that marriage was in 2009. But there is still a pathway for Omar to be denaturalized, which Homan described as a «very serious process» while discussing the investigation into the congresswoman.

«The question is: Do they have it factually, and is it the right thing to do?» Wildes said.

Advertisement

«The question is whether or not inadvertences were made not purposefully and whether or not it’s over the top to then denaturalize somebody,» he said. «We’re talking about taking away a benefit and then banishing them from the United States.»

FORMER USCIS OFFICIAL, ACCOMPLICE CHARGED IN ALLEGED $960K CITIZENSHIP BRIBERY SCHEME

For Omar to be denaturalized, the process would have to be related to allegations that she falsified information when obtaining her own citizenship in 2000. Omar claims she was granted automatic citizenship because she was a minor when her father was naturalized.

Advertisement

Congressional records state Omar became a citizen at age 17, but speculation that she was older at the time of her naturalization began after former Minnesota congressional candidate AJ Kern accused Omar’s birth year of being revised on the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library website.

This caused allegations to circulate on social media that she was not a minor at the time, which if ever proven true, could lead to her denaturalization. Even if her father lied in his citizenship paperwork, this could also potentially lead to Omar being stripped of her citizenship.

Wildes also explained that the government makes a «case-by-case» decision when it comes to pursuing denaturalization cases. He also pointed out the relevancy of an intentional lie as opposed to a mistake.

Advertisement

«If the government were to prosecute for document fraud, we would also want to know whether or not she was represented by counsel, and if there were simple mistakes on her application or inadvertences that may be deemed to be fraudulent,» Wildes said.

«Whether or not [these] things are truthful, hypothesized, or can be backed up in fact, will play heavily in that prosecution.»

Homan didn’t answer whether the federal government has evidence that Omar committed either marriage or immigration fraud, while also declining to go into detail into what particularly DHS is investigating Omar for.

Advertisement

Omar told Digital just last week that she has not been contacted by DHS or made aware of any ongoing investigation into her marriage or immigration status, saying she isn’t worried about it because «the right wing always had this s — going.»

‘SQUAD’ DEM DISMISSES FRAUD PROBE SPECULATION AFTER $29M NET-WORTH DROP

But Wildes said her being unaware that she is being investigated is not unusual and doesn’t invalidate Homan’s confirmation of a «criminal» investigation against her.

Advertisement

«The Congresswoman’s not being aware doesn’t change anything,» Wildes said. «There is no obligation for the government to show their hand and they’re going to want to make sure that they have a good prosecution and they don’t give anything up in the interim because of the politics that this presents as well.»

«I haven’t seen anything that I think is worthy of a prosecution,» Wildes said. «This is a member of Congress. It may not be your politics, but we have to also make sure that we engage in prosecutions properly and not frivolously. «

Neither Omar nor DHS responded to requests for comment.

Advertisement

ilhan omar, politics, homeland security, immigration, investigations, tom homan, naturalization

INTERNACIONAL

Rubio confirms ‘foreign actor’ involved in UK terror plot

Published

on



Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that a recent thwarted terror plot near a United Kingdom military base used by the United States involved a «foreign actor,» linking the incident to global threats from adversaries such as Iran.

«What happened, what almost happened, what could have happened in the U.K. over the weekend is a very serious situation,» Rubio told Fox News’ «Hannity» on Monday night. «It’s one that clearly involves the hands of a foreign actor.»

Advertisement

«I won’t get into great detail about that yet.»

RUBIO QUESTIONS ‘POINT’ OF NATO AFTER ALLIES BLOCKED US FROM USING BASES DURING IRAN CONFLICT

Rubio added there would be «repercussions» for threats against U.S. interests.

Advertisement

«I think it ties us to the reality here, and that is, we are dealing with elements in the world, and in the case of Iran, for example, who have openly threatened to attack American interests globally,» he continued. «We’re going to always take that very seriously. There will be repercussions for that, if it ever were to happen or even attempted.»

Rubio thanked the partners in the U.K. for helping thwart the «very serious threat» of an attack.

TRUMP WARNS US WOULD ‘DECIMATE AND DESTROY’ IRAN OVER ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

Advertisement

«I want to thank the U.K. for their cooperation and their help on it,» he said. «There’s a lot more news that will come out on this in the days to come. But there’s only so much I can say right now at this point about it, other than this was a very serious thing, and it was responded to appropriately.»

British police declared a major incident at the RAF Fairford base in western England following the arrests early Sunday, and the government held a national emergency meeting.

Police, however, released the five on bail Monday but said the investigation was not over, and they were examining whether individuals acting for a foreign state were involved.

Advertisement

BRITAIN INTRODUCES SWEEPING NEW POWERS TO TARGET FOREIGN STATE-LINKED GROUPS INCLUDING IRAN’S IRGC

President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Monday that the incident «might be» connected to Iran, which the United States has been at war with since late February, and that he would not have released the suspects on bail.

«I wouldn’t have done that,» he said.

Advertisement

A source familiar with the situation told Reuters that three large white vans the men appeared to travel in had not contained viable explosives.

TRUMP RETALIATES AFTER IRAN ATTACK AS EXPERT WARNS REGIME IS GROWING MORE DANGEROUS

The Reuters source said Sunday’s police response had not been intelligence-led — an indication that the five were not under direct surveillance — but security had been beefed up at the base, suggesting there was information it was being targeted.

Advertisement

The five arrested are all British nationals in their early 20s from London. They were detained in the early hours on Sunday after police were alerted by a local farmer to the three white vans parked near RAF Fairford.

Local residents have said security was significantly beefed up at the base in the days leading up to Sunday. The local farmer told reporters that one neighbor, driving past the base on Saturday night, had been ordered by U.S. security personnel to stop and put their hands out of their car.

AMERICA BUILT A FORTRESS AFTER 9/11. THEN THE THREAT STARTED HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT

Advertisement

The farmer, who asked not to be named, called the police after she returned home around 1 a.m. local time and found three large vans parked in the road, one with a fake telephone number on it, and a group of hooded and masked men running away.

A large cordon remained around the base Tuesday morning and roadblocks were in place, although local media reports said residents from nearby homes which had been evacuated were returning.

Western governments have warned in recent years of the threat of hostile actors from Iran, Russia and elsewhere organizing destabilizing activity or hiring proxies to carry out plots.

Advertisement

PUTIN AND IRAN ‘NEED EACH OTHER DESPERATELY,’ EXPERT SAYS, AS RUSSIA VOICES SUPPORT FOR REGIME

Britain raised its national terrorism threat level to its second-highest in April after a series of antisemitic incidents in north London, meaning an attack is considered highly likely.

It has also imposed sanctions on individuals and entities linked to Iran, accusing them of involvement in hostile ‌activity including plotting attacks and providing financial services to groups seeking to destabilize Britain and other countries.

Advertisement

Iran has denied involvement in attacks or plots in Britain and elsewhere, and Monday denied any involvement in the incident at Fairford.

Reuters contributed to this report.

defense, state department, marco rubio, iran, terrorism, national security, foreign affairs, counter terrorism, secretary of defense

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Volar un dron cerca de un aeropuerto o un incendio podrá costar hasta USD 14.460 en Ecuador

Published

on



Volar un dron en las inmediaciones de un aeródromo o hacerlo cerca de un incendio forestal podrá generar una multa de hasta USD 14.460 en Ecuador. Esas son dos de las conductas consideradas muy graves dentro del régimen sancionatorio incluido en la nueva Ley Orgánica de Aviación Civil, aprobada por la Asamblea Nacional el 24 de septiembre de 2026.

El texto, que obtuvo 88 votos afirmativos, introduce sanciones económicas específicas para el uso irregular de aeronaves no tripuladas y amplía los mecanismos para conocer quién importa, registra y finalmente opera estos aparatos en el país. Sin embargo, las multas todavía no están vigentes: el proyecto debe completar el trámite ante el Ejecutivo y posteriormente ser publicado en el Registro Oficial para entrar en vigor.

Advertisement

La sanción máxima equivale a 30 salarios básicos unificados. Con el salario básico de USD 482 vigente en 2026, representa USD 14.460.

No todos los incumplimientos recibirán ese castigo. La normativa establece tres niveles de infracciones. Las leves tendrán multas de tres a seis salarios básicos, entre USD 1.446 y USD 2.892; las graves, de 11 a 20 salarios, entre USD 5.302 y USD 9.640; y las muy graves, de 21 a 30 salarios, entre USD 10.122 y USD 14.460.

Un usuario podrá ser sancionado, por ejemplo, por operar un dron que debía estar registrado y no cumplió ese procedimiento. También constituye una infracción no colocar en el aparato la identificación o el código QR generado por el sistema de registro de la Dirección General de Aviación Civil (DGAC).

Advertisement

Las reformas fueron aprobadas recientemente en la Asamblea Nacional. REUTERS/Karen Toro

Las consecuencias aumentan cuando la operación representa mayores riesgos. Ingresar sin autorización a un espacio aéreo restringido, transportar carga o mercancías sin el permiso requerido o desarrollar actividades comerciales o profesionales sin los seguros y garantías correspondientes están incluidos entre los incumplimientos graves.

En esa misma categoría consta modificar las características funcionales originales del aparato o utilizarlo por encima de sus limitaciones operacionales.

La escala máxima se reserva para operaciones consideradas de mayor riesgo para la seguridad aérea. Una de ellas es introducir un dron en las zonas prohibidas alrededor de aeródromos. Otra es utilizarlo en el espacio aéreo cercano a un incendio forestal, excepto cuando se trate de equipos del servicio público que intervengan en la atención de la emergencia.

Advertisement

La presencia de aeronaves no tripuladas en esas áreas puede interferir con helicópteros u otros medios aéreos empleados para combatir el fuego. Por eso, además de la multa, las infracciones muy graves podrán provocar la suspensión de permisos o certificados durante un período de tres a seis meses.

(Foto: Pixabay)

Ecuador ya regulaba la operación de drones antes de esta reforma. La DGAC expidió en diciembre de 2024 la RDAC 101, que establece condiciones técnicas para los sistemas de aeronaves no tripuladas. Los equipos que superan los 250 gramos están sujetos a registro y, según datos divulgados por la autoridad aeronáutica, alrededor de 2.000 constan actualmente en el sistema nacional.

La diferencia introducida por la nueva legislación está en el fortalecimiento del régimen sancionatorio y en la intención de seguir la pista de estos aparatos desde antes de que comiencen a volar.

Advertisement

El control llegará hasta las importaciones. El texto aprobado establece que las aeronaves no tripuladas no podrán ser nacionalizadas, desembarcadas o liberadas por Aduana sin presentar previamente la documentación de homologación técnica, autorización o registro administrativo exigida por la autoridad aeronáutica.

Vista del techo de la cárcel de máxima seguridad La Roca luego de que la policía frustrara el intento de que explosivos ingresaran a la prisión.

Con eso, la DGAC deberá coordinar con las entidades responsables del comercio exterior para vincular el ingreso del equipo con su posterior propietario u operador.

Durante la discusión legislativa también estuvo presente otra preocupación: el empleo de drones para actividades criminales. Autoridades ecuatorianas han advertido sobre aparatos adaptados para transportar objetos y explosivos. La nueva normativa contempla la coordinación entre instituciones para incautar aeronaves no tripuladas cuando sean utilizadas en la comisión de infracciones penales.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Estudiantes en Teherán protestan contra las tarifas, el hiyab y la teocracia: “Hasta que el clérigo no sea amortajado”

Published

on


Estudiantes de la Universidad Allameh Tabataba’i de Teherán, la principal institución pública de ciencias sociales de Irán, iniciaron este lunes una serie de manifestaciones en el campus central para protestar contra el fuerte incremento en las tarifas de matrícula, el deterioro de las condiciones de vida en las residencias universitarias y la persistente imposición del código de vestimenta obligatorio, según informes y material audiovisual difundidos por organizaciones estudiantiles y medios de la oposición iraní en el exilio.

Las imágenes compartidas por la red opositora Iran International, el boletín estudiantil Amirkabir y activistas en las redes sociales muestran a grupos de jóvenes concentrados en las instalaciones académicas mientras gritan consignas políticas. En una de las grabaciones atribuidas a la jornada, se escucha a los manifestantes corear: “Hasta que el clérigo no sea amortajado, esta patria no será una patria”, un lema clásico del activismo universitario dirigido de forma directa contra la cúpula teocrática gobernante.

Advertisement

El boletín estudiantil Amirkabir registró otras consignas coreadas durante la protesta, entre ellas “Costos elevados, inflación, un flagelo para la vida de las personas” y “Trabajo, desempleo, hiyab obligatorio para las mujeres”, que vincularon de manera explícita el reclamo académico con la crisis económica general del país.

Según el mismo boletín, integrantes de la milicia paramilitar Basij se presentaron en el lugar de la manifestación y, bajo la excusa de entablar un diálogo con los estudiantes, intentaron disolver la concentración con amenazas.

Los manifestantes respondieron con el cántico “No queremos diálogo, no lo queremos” y exigieron además la liberación de compañeros detenidos con la frase “El estudiante encarcelado debe ser liberado”.

Advertisement

Un centro histórico de disidencia bajo presión

La Universidad Allameh Tabataba’i, considerada la principal institución pública de ciencias sociales de Irán, posee un extenso historial de politización y resistencia. El campus se consolidó como uno de los epicentros del movimiento de protesta desencadenado a finales de 2022 tras la muerte de Mahsa Amini bajo custodia de la policía de la moral.

Desde aquel estallido, la administración de la universidad y los comités de seguridad estatal han reforzado las represalias internas. Reportes de grupos de derechos humanos indican que decenas de alumnos han sufrido expulsiones, suspensiones académicas y la prohibición de ingreso a los dormitorios, además del despliegue recurrente de miembros de la milicia paramilitar Basij para intimidar las concentraciones, tal como ocurrió este lunes.

Advertisement

Los estudiantes también responsabilizaron de forma directa a las autoridades académicas con la consigna “Rector de la universidad, responsable y rinda cuentas”, y cerraron la jornada con un mensaje de continuidad: “No piensen en un solo día, nuestra decisión es de todos los días”.

Inflación, sanciones y el trasfondo de la tensión regional

Misiles iraníes junto a un cartel del líder supremo Mojtabá Jamenei en Teherán, el 27 de septiembre de 2026. La exhibición militar ocurre entre crecientes tensiones regionales y la crisis económica en Irán. (WANA vía Reuters)

La reactivación de los reclamos estudiantiles se produce en un momento crítico para la economía iraní, donde el impacto de las sanciones financieras internacionales se ha agudizado tras la escalada bélica en Medio Oriente y las trabas a las exportaciones petroleras.

Estas restricciones asfixiaron a un sistema productivo ya fragilizado y aceleraron la devaluación del rial. Según cifras del Banco Central de Irán, la inflación interanual alcanzó un máximo histórico de 88,6% en junio de 2026, el nivel más alto desde 1942, y se mantuvo en 87,9% en julio, más del doble del 40% registrado a fines de 2025, cuando estalló la crisis del Gran Bazar.

Advertisement

El alto costo de vida, que los propios manifestantes describieron este lunes como “un flagelo para la vida de las personas”, se convirtió en el eje que atraviesa tanto los reclamos universitarios como el descontento social a nivel nacional.

La pérdida del poder adquisitivo y el ahogo económico no son fenómenos aislados, sino el detonante recurrente de las mayores olas de inestabilidad social en el país. A finales de diciembre de 2025, el colapso de la moneda provocó un paro comercial e intensas manifestaciones que iniciaron comerciantes en el Gran Bazar de Teherán. Aunque comenzaron con reclamos estrictamente económicos, las movilizaciones se extendieron con rapidez a más de cien ciudades y escalaron hacia consignas políticas abiertas contra la cúpula teocrática. Al igual que en las protestas de 2017, 2019 y el movimiento “Mujer, Vida, Libertad” de 2022, las fuerzas del régimen respondieron con una represión masiva. Informes de organizaciones de derechos humanos y agencias internacionales documentaron el uso de munición real, detenciones arbitrarias que HRANA cifró en más de 42.000, y apagones totales de internet para encubrir la violencia estatal, que dejó un saldo de víctimas cuyas estimaciones oscilan entre los 3.117 muertos reconocidos por el gobierno iraní y los más de 30.000 reportados por organizaciones de DDHH.

Middle East,Top Pictures,Military Conflicts

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias