INTERNACIONAL
Bipartisan lawmakers want to strip Big Tech’s legal immunity that can shield social media companies
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
It was the mid-1990s. And the world was online.
No doomscrolling for hours through Instagram and X.
But people were plowing through GeoCities. There were Hotbot searches – before the days of Google and AI. There was even Ask Jeeves, long before Grok.
The U.S. Capitol building is shown in Washington, D.C. A Romanian man admitted to participating in a series of «swatting» calls that targeted members of Congress, as well as other government officials. (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)
Congress was on the precipice of adopting a landmark telecommunications law which would dictate the digital landscape for decades.
When signing the Telecommunications Act of 1996 into law, former President Clinton declared how the measure would plow «a superhighway to serve both the private sector and the public interest.»
RAND PAUL SAYS PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH YOUTUBE AND GOOGLE CHANGED HIS MIND ABOUT PLATFORM LIABILITY
Yup. Back then, some still referred to the internet as «The Information Superhighway.»
The 1990s were heady. Full of optimism and possibility. The. U.S. won the Cold War. The economy boomed and was «new.» The internet linked the world.
But there was a serious debate about free speech. Who should regulate what was online? Should the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) address what was proper to post, the same way it oversaw the TV and radio airwaves?
In the early ‘90s, the National Security Agency (NSA) used a cryptographic backdoor to intercept phone calls called the «clipper chip.» That raised questions about government surveillance. Would that carry over to what the government «watched» when people posted content online?
A U.S. National Security Agency logo is displayed on a smartphone screen with stock market percentages in the background in this photo illustration on Jan. 30, 2024, in Poland. (Omar Marques/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images)
Congress ultimately decided to give the internet a lot of leeway – in the interest of free speech. Telecommunications firms persuaded lawmakers to grant them a legal shelter. «Carriers» weren’t responsible if «customers» posted questionable or offensive material.
«We said that the FCC would not regulate either the content or the character of the internet,» said then- Rep. Chris Cox (R-Calif.) during a 1995 floor debate. «We can’t have the government in the interest of uniformity coming up with standards to regulate this industry.»
Cox was a key player behind shaping policy in that 1996 telecommunications law. So was then-Rep. and now Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
«The internet is the shining star of the information age,» proclaimed Wyden in 1996.
RULING AGAINST META AND GOOGLE COULD SET THE STAGE FOR CHANGES IN HANDLING HATE CONTENT
But the Oregon Democrat fretted about some of the filth which was already permeating the internet in its earliest renditions.
«My wife and I have seen our kids find their way into these chat rooms which make their middle age parents cringe,» said Wyden.
But like Cox, Wyden feared that «censorship could really spoil much of its promise.»
So they fought to keep some government regulation out of the telecommunications law. And they inoculated internet providers with something called «Section 230» of that law. Section 230 shielded telecom firms with immunity from lawsuits and criminal charges based on what customers posted on their forums.
Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) described the logic behind Section 230 and the role of service providers:
«If you, as a public service, put up a billboard in a hall and someone puts something on the billboard that says, ‘Congressman Obernolte beats his wife,’ the owner of the billboard is not responsible for the content of that message,» said the California Republican.
Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., attends a House Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands hearing on the 9/11 Memorial and Museum Act and other legislation in the Longworth Building on Dec. 7, 2021. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images)
But lots of people and entities post all sorts of things on today’s worldwide «billboard.» That’s why some lawmakers want to fundamentally alter social media as we know it by paring back Section 230.
«Section 230 is absolute liability protection, immunity for the largest social media companies in the world. It’s driving people to suicide. It is ruining our society,» said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), one of the most ardent advocates for changing the law. «If you buy a bad car, you can sue. Every product you buy, the company has to stand behind it. This is the only area of the law I know where the largest companies in the world have absolute legal immunity.»
Graham went as far to suggest that what is available online – and how people use social media – is «as dangerous as drinking.»
WHY META AND GOOGLE ARE LOSING COURT BATTLES FOR DAMAGING KIDS BY TRYING TO GET THEM ADDICTED
«It’s putting profits over people,» chimed in Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). «(Social media) should not have this absolute shield when it is destroying the lives of young people by driving toxic content at them through its algorithms.»
Bipartisan lawmakers are boiling about what social media firms allow users to post without legal consequences – even though Congress is partially responsible for creating this problem three decades ago.
«As long as these companies believe they’re immune from liability, they’re going to tell all of us to go to hell,» said Graham.
UNDER OATH, META’S ZUCKERBERG SHOWED WHY BIG TECH CAN’T POLICE ITSELF
Some lawmakers want to strip legal immunity from Big Tech for what winds up on their platforms.
«What we ought to do is start by allowing victims of child porn and other child abuse material and sexual abuse material to sue these companies,» said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.)
Lawmakers believed that enhanced opportunities for voices and speech would enable the internet to flourish. They argued that the free market would create a rich environment online. So they sidelined their instincts to overregulate.
«Government is going to get out of the way and let parents and individuals control it rather than government doing that job for us,» said Cox in 1995.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., talks with reporters in the U.S. Capitol during votes on Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
But lofty hopes for a lush «marketplace of ideas» online are dashed by some of the digital slop – and addictive nature of «phones» today.
«You talk to people and they’re scared to death of social media. They’re scared to death of AI,» said
Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.).
That’s why lawmakers demand changes to Section 230.
One lawmaker says free speech safeguards are crucial for the people deciding what users see online. But not the technology behind it. Today, the technology makes many of those decisions about what we see and hear on our phones.
«If you just have an algorithm spewing all this information..» sighed Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.). «The First Amendment doesn’t protect an algorithm.»
In 1996, Ron Wyden told C-SPAN during an interview that «censorship could really spoil much of (the internet’s) promise.»
And in 2026, Wyden is still leery of infringing on free speech through regulation. He says the hands-off approach helped the development of Wikipedia and the social media platform Bluesky. A more aggressive posture could stifle development.
«To get rid of (Section) 230, you’re going to have to roll over me,» said Wyden this year.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
In 2026, people are struggling to harness the technology. Trying to ween themselves off addiction to phones. Figuring out ways to keep kids from phones in order to build reading and vocabulary skills.
The digital optimism of the mid-1990s is gone. And those who were there are nostalgic for the sound of an old, staticky modem and the delightful proclamation that «you’ve got mail.»
first amendment, big tech backlash, technology, fcc, regulation, politics
INTERNACIONAL
Newsom’s ‘Golden State Start’ promises 400 free diapers per baby as California grapples with budget woes
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Gov. Gavin Newsom is rolling out a taxpayer-backed freebie for new parents, promising hundreds of diapers for every baby born in California under a new statewide program.
The Democrat announced Friday that the state will partner with nonprofit Baby2Baby to hand out 400 free diapers to families leaving participating hospitals, starting this summer. The initiative, dubbed «Golden State Start,» is being billed as a first-in-the-nation effort to ease the high cost of raising a child.
«Every baby born in California deserves a healthy start in life,» Newsom said in a statement, touting the plan as part of his broader push to tackle affordability.
CALIFORNIA IS BROKE, BUT IT’S NOT TOO LATE FOR THE REST OF US
Calif. Governor Gavin Newsom announced on May 8 that the state is partnering with Baby2Baby, a leading national nonprofit organization headquartered in California, to launch a first-in-the-nation program to provide free diapers to all new babies born in California. (Governor Gavin Newsom)
Under the program, hospitals will distribute the diapers directly to parents upon discharge. Officials said early rollout will prioritize facilities serving low-income patients on Medi-Cal, with plans to expand statewide.
During the program’s first year, it will be offered at about 65 to 75 hospitals that handle about a quarter of births in the state and largely serve low-income patients, Newsom’s office said, according to the Associated Press.
The move is the latest in a string of family-focused spending initiatives from the Newsom administration, which already includes free school meals and universal preschool for 4-year-olds.
Critics are likely to challenge the program’s price tag, particularly as California navigates a tightening fiscal environment. Fox News Digital has reached out to the governor’s office regarding the costs of the program.
According to the Associated Press, the state has allocated $7.4 million in last year’s budget to launch the free diaper initiative, and Governor Newsom’s latest proposal seeks an additional $12.5 million for implementation through the fiscal year ending in June 2027.
However, these spending goals collide with a sobering economic reality.
In its January budget overview, the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) noted that while the administration officially projected a $2.9 billion deficit for 2026-27, the long-term outlook is far more dire. The LAO warned that the state faces structural deficits ranging from $20 billion to $35 billion annually over the coming years
The state has partnered with nonprofit Baby2Baby to manufacture the diapers under the label «Golden State Start.» (Governor Gavin Newsom)
State officials said that they are also looking at ways to take on major diaper brands and drive down prices.
Baby2Baby, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit that distributes supplies to children in need, will handle manufacturing and logistics for the program. The group says diaper need is widespread, with as many as one in two families struggling to afford them.
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL DISTRICT INFORMS PARENTS PERIOD PRODUCTS ARE IN BATHROOMS FOR ‘ANY STUDENT WHO MENSTRUATES’
Co-CEOs Norah Weinstein and Kelly Sawyer Patricof praised the partnership as «historic,» saying it will help families during one of their most financially vulnerable moments.
«We are incredibly grateful to Governor Newsom for his ongoing commitment to combating diaper needs in California and could not be prouder to partner on this historic initiative that will support moms and babies at their most vulnerable time,» Weinstein and Patricof said in a joint statement.
During the program’s first year, it will be offered at about 65 to 75 hospitals that handle about a quarter of births in the state and largely serve low-income patients, Newsom’s office said. (Governor Gavin Newsom)
The announcement comes two years after Tennessee and Delaware became the first U.S. states to offer free diapers to families enrolled in their Medicaid programs, which provide healthcare to low-income families.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Tennessee families can go to pharmacies to pick up 100 diapers per month for children under two. The Delaware program, which began as a pilot before the state extended it in 2024, provides individuals with up to 80 diapers and up to one pack of baby wipes per week in the first 12 weeks.
Fox News Digital’s Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.
gavin newsom, baby deals, childrens health, parents, california
INTERNACIONAL
Nahuel Gallo contó por primera vez detalles sobre los 448 días de cautiverio: “Pensé en quitarme la vida”
El 8 de diciembre de 2024, Nahuel Gallo tenía previsto cruzar la frontera entre Colombia y Venezuela. Todo parecía en orden, hasta que un agente de la Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (DGCIM) descubrió que era gendarme. “Ahí ya me trataban diferente. Me esposaron los pies, me esposaron las manos», contó en una entrevista exclusiva de TN Internacional que será transmitida este sábado a las 14:00.
Cuatro días después, su nombre empezó a circular en los medios argentinos con la noticia de que había sido detenido por el chavismo. Lo que ocurrió en ese cruce fronterizo, en sus propias palabras, fue una trampa que arrancó con una búsqueda en su celular.
Después de ese tenso intercambio con los agentes de la DGCIM, el gendarme argentino permaneció 448 días en cautiverio en Venezuela, sin la posibilidad de comunicarse con su familia. Ahora, Gallo cuenta su historia por primera vez.
El viaje y la frontera
Según contó en diálogo con la periodista Carolina Amoroso, Gallo salió de la Argentina el 6 de diciembre. Voló de Chile a Bogotá, luego a Cúcuta y desde allí cruzó, vía terrestre, hacia Venezuela. Cuando llegó a Migraciones, alrededor de las 8 de la mañana del 8 de diciembre, le dijeron que antes de sellarle el pasaporte debía pasar por una entrevista.
“Cuando vino el agente a entrevistarme, yo no sabía quién era. No sabía si era el SEBIN (Servicio Bolivariano de Inteligencia), la Policía, no entendía la diferencia entre una fuerza y la otra. Estaban de civil. Tenían arma, pero no tenían placa identificatoria”, relató.
El gendarme argentino habló en exclusiva con TN Internacional. (Foto: captura de TN.)
Él mostró toda la documentación reglamentaria para ingresar. “Tenía dólares en efectivo, pero no le dio mucha importancia. Lo que le importaba era ver mi celular”, agregó.
Gallo no tenía fotos uniformado. “No soy de sacar muchas fotos, ni posando con las armas, nada. Tenía fotos del bebé, de las carreras, paisajes”, aseguró.
Pero el agente no se detuvo en las fotos. “Entró a WhatsApp. Le pregunté qué hacía y me dijo que quería ver si hablaba mal de su presidente. Puso ‘Chávez’, no salió nada. Puso ‘Maduro’ y ese fue el detonante”.
En ese chat con su esposa, María Alexandra Gómez, había una conversación donde hablaban de la realidad del país. En ese momento, el intercambio con el agente se tensó aun más. “Me dijo que yo hablaba mal de su presidente, que quién era yo para decir eso. Le dije que era una conversación vieja, que no tenía nada que ver, que era una conversación privada con mi mujer”. Cuando Gallo salió un momento, los policías que estaban afuera también lo minimizaron: “Me dijeron ‘todo el mundo habla mal de Maduro’. Pero el agente no lo tomó igual”.
En esa primera instancia, Gallo no reveló que era integrante de la Gendarmería Nacional. “Dije que era aduanero, que trabajaba en la Aduana en el área de Seguridad. Nunca dije que era gendarme”.
Leé también: Nahuel Gallo denunció en la Justicia las torturas que sufrió en Venezuela: “Me duele volver a esos momentos”
El integrante de las fuerzas venezolanas revisó con más profundidad el celular y encontraron una foto que lo delataba. “Ahí ya me trataban diferente. Me esposaron los pies, me esposaron las manos. Y también se enojaron porque les había mentido, porque no era aduanero sino personal de una fuerza”. Su delito, aparentemente, fue enviar un mensaje en el que mencionó a Maduro. “Acá en Venezuela nadie habla mal del presidente porque si no la pasa mal”, le dijeron.
Antes de ese momento, ya lo habían golpeado. “Estaban enojados por lo de Maduro. Entonces me taparon la cabeza por primera vez. Yo decía, ¿por qué me tapan la cabeza?”.
“Lo había pensado”
Los 448 días de cautiverio tuvieron momentos oscuros, pero el más terrible fue el instante en el que lo detuvieron. “Para mí lo peor es diciembre. No saber qué iba a pasar conmigo, no saber de María, de mi bebé. Los golpes que te pegan por ser gendarme o por ser argentino. Estar 24 horas los siete días en la celda… uno piensa muchas cosas”, aseguró.
Y luego, confesó: “Siempre me preguntan si quise quitarme la vida. Y la respuesta es que lo había pensado”.
Nahuel Gallo, Venezuela, Argentina, Nicolás Maduro
Trump admin releases files on UFOs, alien life in ‘world exclusive’
White House correspondent Peter Doocy reports on the Trump administration’s release of the first batch of UFO and «alien life» files. He details videos from the Department of War and historical Apollo 17 transcripts, noting the administration’s push for transparency. Doocy also recalls President Trump’s previous remarks on the existence of aliens, triggering further discussion among the hosts.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Trump administration’s decision to declassify a batch of UFO and UAP files Friday drew unexpected praise from a prominent Democratic lawmaker.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., the leader of Senate Democrats’ campaign arm, cheered the release of dozens of never-before-seen images and videos, stating, «Transparency is the only path to truth.»
«I am encouraged that the administration has finally heard my call and the call of millions of Americans to begin unsealing these files,» Gillibrand wrote on social media, adding that she has long advocated for the declassification and release of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) files.
«This is another important step, but there is much more work to do,» the New York Democrat went on. «I will continue to fight to ensure the administration finally meets its legal obligation to the American people.»
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., was among a handful of Democratic lawmakers to praise President Donald Trump’s release of UFO-related material on Friday. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images)
DECLASSIFIED APOLLO MOON DOCS DESCRIBE UNEXPLAINED MYSTERIES, UFO LIGHTS ‘LIKE THE FOURTH OF JULY’
The Trump administration’s file dump, available on the newly created website war.gov/UFO, contains records related to UAP, including inexplicable lights and phenomena captured during the Apollo 12 mission in 1969 and Apollo 17 in 1972.
President Donald Trump in February directed the Department of War and other agencies to declassify and publish files related to alien and extraterrestrial life. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Friday that the administration would continue its declassification work.
GOP lawmakers widely praised the administration’s effort to bring more transparency to UAP-related material.
«This is a massive first step in the right direction,» Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., who has long pushed for the file release, said Friday.
Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., also called the move «historic» and said he hoped the file release would be the first of many.
The Pentagon’s disclosure also prompted tepid enthusiasm from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who omitted the Trump administration in his statement.
«For decades, UFO disclosure has been a distant object — unidentified and unexplained,» he said. «That’s starting to change. I’ll keep pushing until we land on the truth.»
The Apollo 11 spacecraft orbits the moon during NASA’s 1969 mission, marking a significant milestone in space exploration. (The Pentagon)
TULSI GABBARD TELLS PODCASTER ALIENS MAY BE REAL: ‘WE’RE CONTINUING TO LOOK FOR THE TRUTH’
Trump argued Friday that his administration’s transparency efforts related to government secrets far surpassed those of his predecessors.
«Whereas previous Administrations have failed to be transparent on this subject, with these new Documents and Videos, the people can decide for themselves, «WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?» Trump wrote on the social media platform Truth Social announcing the release of the files. «Have Fun and Enjoy!»
President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order on the declassification and release of records related to the assassinations of former President John F. Kennedy, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy and Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in the Oval Office of the White House on Jan. 23, 2025, in Washington. (AP)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The Trump administration also declassified records last year related to former President John F. Kennedy’s assassination and the 1937 disappearance of Amelia Earhart.
politics, ufos, democrats elections, republicans elections, tulsi gabbard, kirsten gillibrand
Newsom’s ‘Golden State Start’ promises 400 free diapers per baby as California grapples with budget woes
La CNV autorizó 13 nuevos CEDEARs: en cuáles recomiendan invertir expertos de la City
Independiente Rivadavia vs. Unión: formaciones, hora y dónde ver por tv
De qué operaron a Máximo Kirchner
El Gobierno ajusta la letra chica del “Súper RIGI” y pone en marcha una negociación con gobernadores
¿Cuál es el talón de Aquiles de las Big Tech?
“Terminaste imponiendo un corralito”: Milei y Caputo cruzaron a Cavallo por pedir la eliminación del cepo cambiario
Victoria Villarruel le respondió a un seguidor y aprovechó para chicanear a Adorni: “Que tengas una cascada de éxitos”
Patricia Bullrich le pidió a Manuel Adorni que presente su declaración jurada: «No puede quedar la sensación de que somos iguales a los que venimos a correr»
Marcela Pagano cruzó a Milei por acusarla de “mentirosa compulsiva”: “Confundió rating con grandeza”
POLITICA2 días agoPatricia Bullrich le pidió a Manuel Adorni que presente su declaración jurada: «No puede quedar la sensación de que somos iguales a los que venimos a correr»
- POLITICA2 días ago
Marcela Pagano cruzó a Milei por acusarla de “mentirosa compulsiva”: “Confundió rating con grandeza”
- POLITICA2 días ago
Javier Milei adelantó que Manuel Adorni presentará su declaración jurada, tras la presión de Bullrich
