Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Cláusula de soberanía y el rol de Hezbollah: los 6 puntos del acuerdo para un cese al fuego entre Israel y el Líbano

Published

on


Israel y el Líbano comenzaron en la medianoche de este jueves un período de diez días de alto el fuego, tal como anunció Donald Trump más temprano. Hasta justo antes de la entrada en vigencia del acuerdo hubo ataques cruzados, con muertos en el sur libanés y heridos en el norte israelí. El propio Estados Unidos fue quien detalló los términos de la tregua, con un comunicado de seis puntos que van de la cláusula de soberanía a un compromiso sobre Hezbollah.

El acuerdo fue anunciado por Trump en su red Truth Social. El presidente de Estados Unidos será el anfitrión de las negociaciones entre Israel y El Líbano, que se desarrollarán en los próximos días y que incluso pueden incluir una visita conjunta a la Casa Blanca.

Advertisement

La gravedad del conflicto entre Israel y Líbano había aumentado justo después de la tregua entre Israel y Estados Unidos, por un lado, e Irán. Ocurre que después de la entrada en vigencia de ese alto el fuego, las autoridades israelíes siguieron atacando el sur del Líbano, en maniobras que anunciaron como contra infraestructura de Hezbollah.

Esos ataques tensaron las negociaciones EE.UU.-Irán, ya que el régimen persa -a través de su canciller- remarcó que el cese al fuego con los estadounidenses y los israelíes incluía a otros países aliados en la región, como Líbano.

Finalmente, este jueves Trump anunció el acuerdo de cese al fuego entre Israel y Líbano. Se prevé que funcione en tándem con la tregua EE.UU-Irán, que en principio concluye el martes 22.

Advertisement

Siguiendo al anuncio hecho por el presidente estadounidense en las redes sociales, el Departamento de Estado de EE.UU. emitió un comunicado para confirmar el acuerdo y por ese medio también detalló los seis puntos que contempla el compromiso entre Israel y el Líbano.

«Israel y el Líbano afirman que los dos países no están en guerra y se comprometen a entablar negociaciones directas de buena fe, facilitadas por Estados Unidos, con el objetivo de alcanzar un acuerdo integral que garantice la seguridad, la estabilidad y la paz duraderas entre ambos países», indica el comunicado.

Fecha y plazo inicial

Advertisement

Israel y Líbano pondrán en marcha un cese de hostilidades a partir del 16 de abril de 2026 a las 17:00 EST, por un período inicial de diez días, como gesto de buena voluntad del Gobierno de Israel, con el fin de facilitar negociaciones de buena fe para alcanzar un acuerdo permanente de paz y seguridad entre Israel y Líbano.

En el primer punto resuenan los ecos de los ataques de Israel después de la tregua entre Irán y Estados Unidos. No sólo provocó las reacciones del régimen persa, sino que profundizó la confrontación entre Donald Trump y el papa León XIV.

El presidente de Líbano, Joseph Aoun, con el comandante del ejército, el general Rudolph Hel. Foto EFE

Posible prórroga y sus condiciones

Este período inicial podrá prorrogarse por mutuo acuerdo entre Líbano e Israel si se demuestran avances en las negociaciones y si Líbano demuestra eficazmente su capacidad para hacer valer su soberanía.

Advertisement

El segundo punto introduce la relación entre Beirut y organizaciones terroristas que operan en su territorio. La más importante de ellas es Hezbollah, que nació tras la invasión de Israel al Líbano en 1982.

Conocido como «Partido de Dios», tuvo el apoyo desde el inicio de los Guardianes de la Revolución de Irán. Israel abandonó las zonas ocupadas en el Líbano en 2000. Hezbollah se consolidó y hasta se trenzó en una guerra de 33 días con los israelíes en 2006. La ONU estipula que solo el ejército libanés y los cascos azules de Naciones Unidas deben ser desplegados en el sur de Líbano.

Derecho a defensa de Israel

Advertisement

Israel conservará su derecho a adoptar todas las medidas necesarias en legítima defensa, en cualquier momento, contra ataques planeados, inminentes o en curso. Este derecho no se verá impedido por el cese de las hostilidades. Además, no llevará a cabo ninguna operación militar ofensiva contra objetivos libaneses, incluidos objetivos civiles, militares y otros objetivos estatales, en territorio libanés por tierra, mar y aire.

El tercer punto vuelve sobre las amenazas que se ciernen sobre Israel, que fue atacada por Hezbollah hasta último minuto antes del cese al fuego, con el lanzamiento de una decena de misiles desde el Líbano. También el Ejército israelí hizo maniobras este jueves del otro lado de la frontera.

Compromiso por Hezbollah

Advertisement

A partir del 16 de abril de 2026 a las 17:00 EST, y con apoyo internacional, el Gobierno del Líbano adoptará medidas significativas para impedir que Hezbollah y todos los demás grupos armados no estatales disidentes en el territorio del Líbano lleven a cabo ataques, operaciones o actividades hostiles contra objetivos israelíes.

Libaneses con una bandera de Hezbollah en Beirut. Foto EFE

Es la cláusula contra Hezbollah. Explicita el compromiso del Líbano a frenar los ataques de la organización terrorista. Para su entrada en vigencia contemplaba la misma fecha y hora que el cese al fuego Líbano-Israel.

Es, además, el punto de incertidumbre sobre la factibilidad del cese de las hostilidades en los próximos diez días.

«Tendrán que seguir muy de cerca lo que ocurre sobre el terreno. Si nos sentimos amenazados, reaccionaremos. No nos vamos a ir a ninguna parte. Mantenemos nuestras posiciones», advirtió el representante permanente de Israel ante la ONU, Danny Danon.

Advertisement

Cláusula de soberanía en el sur del Líbano

Todas las partes reconocen que las fuerzas de seguridad del Líbano tienen la responsabilidad exclusiva de la soberanía y la defensa nacional del país; ningún otro país o grupo puede arrogarse la condición de garante de la soberanía del Líbano.

Por un lado, este punto del memorando intenta acotar la influencia de Hezbollah sobre los territorios del sur libanés. Pero también deja bajo atención los reclamos del presidente del Líbano, Joseph Aoun.

Advertisement

«La retirada de las fuerzas israelíes del territorio libanés es un paso fundamental para consolidar el alto el fuego y permitir el despliegue del Ejército del Líbano hasta las fronteras internacionales, extendiendo plenamente la autoridad del Estado y poniendo fin a cualquier presencia armada», dijo Aoun este jueves, antes del anuncio de acuerdo que hizo Trump en las redes.

Benjamin Netanyahu dijo que mantendrá la presencia israelí en el sur del Líbano. Foto Reuters

Benjamin Netanyahu ya avisó que mantendrá la presencia de militares israelíes en una zona de seguridad de 10 kilómetros. «Mucho más fuerte, mucho más potente, mucho más controlable y mucho más sólida que la que teníamos antes. Aquí es donde estamos y no nos iremos», aseguró el primer ministro israelí.

El Líbano ya les pidió a los pobladores del sur del país que esperen a la entrada efectiva en vigencia del acuerdo para comenzar a regresar a sus casas.

Negociaciones y la cuestión de la frontera

Advertisement

Israel y el Líbano solicitan a Estados Unidos que facilite nuevas negociaciones directas entre ambos países con el objetivo de resolver todas las cuestiones pendientes, incluida la demarcación de la frontera terrestre internacional, con vistas a concluir un acuerdo integral que garantice la seguridad, la estabilidad y la paz duraderas entre los dos países.

Establece el punto de partida de las negociaciones que ambos países llevarán a cabo en Estados Unidos.

La mención de la cuestión de la frontera es significativa, ya que no existe un acuerdo firmado entre Líbano e Israel sobre el asunto. Tras décadas de conflicto, se toman como válidos los límites que en 2000 estableció las Naciones Unidas. Se los conoce como «la Línea Azul», que se extiende por 130 km.

Advertisement

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Trump officials unveil private sector blueprint for life after USAID

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: The Trump administration is laying out its clearest blueprint yet for what comes after decades of traditional U.S. foreign aid, arguing that private investment, trade and American business — not taxpayer-funded assistance — should become America’s primary engine for development abroad.

Advertisement

At a U.S. Mission to the United Nations «Trade Over Aid» forum in New York Monday, Ambassador Mike Waltz, the U.S. permanent representative to the United Nations, told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview that the administration is «completely reforming how we do aid» by moving away from taxpayer-funded programs and toward private-sector-led development.

«For too many years, the United States and other countries have poured billions and billions of dollars into these aid programs and got very little in return,» Waltz said. «You go to these forums at the United Nations and at development agencies around the world, and you never find the private sector. You find NGOs and academics and governments, but you don’t find the creators of growth and the creators of jobs.»

U.S. URGES DONORS TO ABANDON U.N.R.W.A. FUNDING AS U.N. DEFENDS AGENCY’S MISSION

Advertisement

Ambassador Mike Waltz speaks at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations’ «Trade Over Aid» forum in New York, where Trump administration officials pitched private investment as a new engine of global development. July 14, 2026. (Donald Conahan/ U.S. mission to the U.N.)

Waltz said the new model is designed to «create jobs, to create business for American companies in line with America First,» while also raising living standards abroad and reducing instability that can fuel terrorism and poverty.

The administration moved to dismantle USAID in 2025, arguing the agency was inefficient and too often disconnected from U.S. foreign policy. Asked directly whether «Trade Over Aid» is replacing USAID, Waltz said USAID’s functions had been folded into the State Department as part of a broader efficiency effort, but insisted the initiative is about something larger than one agency.

Advertisement

«What we’re doing, this isn’t about USAID or what replaces it,» Waltz said. «That was an efficient effort to get our aid to serve our foreign policy, not the other way around. But what I think is more important is how do we help American businesses and how do (we) help create jobs around the world and reduce dependency.»

The stakes are immediate: with USAID reorganized under the State Department and aid budgets under pressure, the Trump administration is trying to show that it has a replacement model for how the U.S. helps poorer and fragile countries. The answer it is pitching is not more traditional aid, but more private capital, more trade, more deals for American companies and fewer open-ended taxpayer commitments.

EXCLUSIVE: SERBIAN PRESIDENT VUČIĆ SAYS SUPPORT FOR US ‘SURGED’ UNDER TRUMP, INVITES HIM TO VISIT BELGRADE

Advertisement

The forum brought together representatives from dozens of countries, U.N. agencies, international financial institutions and major private-sector players, including Microsoft, Google, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Boeing, Walmart, Mastercard, Meta and others.

Czech Environment Minister Igor Cerveny, who attended the forum, said the idea resonated with his country’s own post-communist experience. 

After communism, he said, the Czech Republic had to rebuild through work, business, industry and innovation rather than dependency.

Advertisement
Ambassador Dan Negrea

Ambassador Dan Negrea addresses the U.S. Mission to the United Nations’ «Trade Over Aid» forum in New York, July 13, 2026. (Donald Conahan/ U.S. mission to the U.N.)

«If you work on your economy, on your industry, on your society, on nature as well, probably two, three, five years later, (you will) be in a better position,» Cerveny told Fox News Digital. «You have your own money. You are not now the slave of (asking). You are now the master of your destiny.»

Cerveny said trade gives countries an «opportunity to cooperate» rather than forcing them to return again and again with the same request: «Please give me some money.»

Ambassador Dan Negrea, who is spearheading the initiative in the U.S. Mission, told Fox News Digital that shrinking aid budgets around the world make a new model necessary.

Advertisement

«We need to think differently about how we help developing countries in an environment in which, in the United States, we are indebted and we cannot continue to spend money on helping other countries the way we used to,» Negrea said. «Development aid is going down not only in the U.S., but in countries around the world.»

Negrea said the initiative has received less resistance from developing countries than from traditional donor nations. 

«Interestingly, there is less pushback from countries receiving aid than from some donor countries that like to continue in this attitude of charity, being magnanimous to other countries,» he told Fox News Digital. «For years and years and for decades, many developing countries are saying that they want to end this status of recipient of charity and move to a much more dignified relationship of partners and development.»

Advertisement

But some leaders from developing countries also warn that trade cannot replace aid overnight, especially in emergency settings. The Democratic Republic of Congo’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation, and Francophonie, Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, told Fox News Digital that aid remains critical in crises such as the Ebola outbreak in eastern DRC.

«Aid sometimes can transform dramatically a situation,» she said. «This is not something you can change overnight with trade. But yes, over a long term, trade is the pathway to create greater growth, greater economic prosperity, and therefore also more equal relationships between countries.»

Kayikwamba Wagner added that the shift must be «adapted to circumstances» and not be «too abrupt.»

Advertisement

The initiative already has drawn 46 countries, and launched a digital library with 63 capacity-building offers from private companies, governments, NGOs, philanthropies, academic institutions and international organizations.

But when pressed on what those offers have produced so far, Negrea acknowledged the initiative is still in its early stages. The library was inaugurated last week, he said, and the goal now is to turn offers into concrete outcomes.

«We want to see more deliverables,» Negrea said. «We want to see actual transactions that were done. We want to see countries using the digital library to see usable capacity building offers coming from around the world. So we want to help without the cost to the U.S. taxpayers, but at the same time creating opportunities for American companies.»

Advertisement

The central challenge facing the effort is whether private capital will go where aid has traditionally been most needed: fragile countries with weak institutions, unreliable infrastructure, corruption, conflict or markets too risky for major investors.

WALTZ CALLS U.N. A ‘CESSPOOL FOR ANTISEMITISM’ AS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PUSHES MAJOR REFORMS

Ambassador Dan Negrea moderates a panel at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations’

Ambassador Dan Negrea moderates a panel at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations’ «Trade Over Aid» forum in New York, joined by Czech Environment Minister Igor Cerveny and other participants. (Donald Conahan/ U.S. mission to the U.N.)

Waltz argued that is exactly where institutions such as the U.N. Development Program, the World Bank and the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation can play a role.

Advertisement

«When we talk to organizations like J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs and others, they’re saying, we want to invest hundreds of millions into these industries abroad, but they need better laws, they need better arbitration,» Waltz said. «We need to know that we can get our money out for our investors here in the United States.»

He said the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and U.S. contributions to the World Bank can provide «risk insurance and guarantees» for investments in riskier markets, including critical minerals projects needed by the U.S. technology sector.

«It is incredibly risky,» Waltz said. «Sometimes these capital providers like on Wall Street and in New York are only going to go to the safest place. Sometimes it makes sense, for example, as we’re looking for critical minerals for our tech industry, to go into risky places, but they need a little help.»

Advertisement

The strongest note of caution came not from critics outside the room, but from inside the forum itself.

Alexander De Croo, the former Belgian prime minister who now leads United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), said trade and aid should not be treated as enemies. 

«Trade is a destination, but development is how we get to that destination,» De Croo said. «Markets do not build themselves. They have to be built.»

Advertisement

De Croo said investment flows when rules are predictable, institutions are trusted and workers have the skills to seize opportunity. He described UNDP’s role as helping countries build those foundations. «There is no country over the past decades that has successfully developed without a strong private sector and without trade being a big part of that,» he said.

Christopher Sharrock, Microsoft’s vice president for United Nations and international organizations, also warned that aid still has a role that markets cannot fully replace.

«Aid does do an essential job and it does a job that possibly nothing else can do,» Sharrock said, pointing to vaccination campaigns, famine response and natural disasters as areas where assistance remains critical.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Alexander De Croo

Alexander De Croo, UNDP administrator and former Belgian prime minister, speaks at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations’ «Trade Over Aid» forum in New York, July 13, 2026. (Donald Conahan/ U.S. mission to the U.N.)

For the Trump administration, «Trade Over Aid» is being pitched as a more disciplined, America First answer to development: fewer handouts, more deals, less dependency, more jobs for American companies and foreign partners alike.

But the test will be whether it can deliver not only in countries already ready for investment, but in the hardest places — the places where aid has long filled the gap because markets would not.

Advertisement



united nations, aid, trade, world

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Estados Unidos realizó operaciones diurnas contra Irán para evitar nuevos ataques a barcos comerciales en el estrecho de Ormuz

Published

on


EEUU completó una nueva oleada de ataques contra Irán en la isla de Gran Tunb

Estados Unidos completó el miércoles una nueva oleada de ataques contra Irán, informó el Comando Central de sus fuerzas armadas (CENTCOM), horas después de que Washington reimpusiera el bloqueo naval sobre los puertos iraníes en un marcado retorno a la guerra abierta entre ambos países.

CENTCOM señaló en la red social X que la ofensiva “degradó aún más la capacidad de Irán para atacar el tráfico comercial en el estrecho de Ormuz”. Durante una oleada de 90 minutos, las fuerzas estadounidenses “lanzaron municiones de precisión contra sistemas de defensa costera y sitios de almacenamiento y lanzamiento de misiles crucero” en la isla de Gran Tunb, agregó el comando militar junto a un video que muestra un bombardeo contra objetivos iraníes.

Advertisement

La ofensiva se suma a otra ronda de bombardeos llevada a cabo horas antes, cuando aviones de combate, drones y buques estadounidenses dispararon municiones de precisión durante una operación nocturna de siete horas contra decenas de objetivos militares iraníes. Uno de los ataques alcanzó un cuartel de la 388ª Brigada de Infantería Mecanizada del ejército iraní, en la provincia de Sistán y Baluchistán, matando al menos a siete soldados y dejando más de 260 heridos en todo el país, según funcionarios iraníes. Washington también reanudó los ataques diurnos, un movimiento inusual que evidencia el ritmo creciente de la escalada.

Estados Unidos había impuesto por primera vez el bloqueo en abril y lo levantó el mes pasado tras la firma de un acuerdo provisional que pausó los combates y abrió un plazo de 60 días para negociar temas como el programa nuclear iraní. Esas conversaciones se estancaron a medida que se intensificó la disputa por el estrecho de Ormuz, y el retorno del bloqueo esta semana marcó el colapso de facto de la tregua.

En respuesta, la Guardia Revolucionaria de Irán amenazó con detener todas las exportaciones energéticas de Oriente Medio. “La exportación de petróleo y gas de la región será o para todos o para nadie”, advirtió la fuerza paramilitar.

Advertisement

Irán, por su parte, se atribuyó ataques con misiles y drones contra Bahrein, Kuwait y Jordania, todos países que albergan fuerzas estadounidenses. Bahrein y Kuwait emitieron alertas por fuego entrante la madrugada del miércoles, mientras que Jordania informó haber derribado tres misiles iraníes.

“Más vale que lleguen a un acuerdo, o no les va a quedar nada”, dijo Trump.

El presidente estadounidense, Donald Trump, había anticipado el martes por la noche, en una entrevista con Fox News, que los ataques contra Irán continuarían en los próximos dos días y que puentes y plantas eléctricas podrían convertirse en próximos objetivos si no se reanudan las negociaciones. Estados Unidos ya había atacado al menos un puente.

“Más vale que lleguen a un acuerdo, o no les va a quedar nada”, dijo Trump.

Advertisement

El barril de crudo Brent, referencia internacional, cotizaba el miércoles por encima de los 85 dólares, más de 15% por encima del nivel previo a la guerra, aunque todavía lejos de los casi 120 dólares alcanzados en el punto más álgido del conflicto.

Trump había anunciado el lunes, junto con la reimposición del bloqueo, un arancel del 20% a los barcos que cruzaran el estrecho, pero abandonó luego ese plan citando pedidos de aliados del golfo Pérsico interesados en invertir miles de millones de dólares en Estados Unidos.

El estrecho de Ormuz, por el que en tiempos de paz circula una quinta parte del petróleo y el gas natural comercializados en el mundo, sigue siendo el epicentro del conflicto. Durante el acuerdo provisional, algunos barcos habían retomado el paso por una ruta cercana a Omán, supervisada por militares estadounidenses y fuera del control de Teherán, pero los ataques recíprocos de los últimos días volvieron a interrumpir ese tránsito.

Advertisement

Washington ha amenazado con reabrir el estrecho por la fuerza, aunque analistas sostienen que eso demandaría una armada mucho mayor y posiblemente decenas de miles de tropas terrestres. Mediadores regionales continúan intentando que Estados Unidos e Irán retomen las negociaciones.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Montana Dem running as blue-collar smokejumper spent years lobbying for far-left groups

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Democrat running in a key Montana House race as a «smokejumper» and working-class outsider previously worked as a registered lobbyist opposing state-level bills that would have restricted drag performances in public schools and libraries, banned gender-transition procedures for minors and cracked down on sanctuary policies, records reviewed by Fox News Digital show.

Advertisement

Sam Forstag, the Democratic nominee in Montana’s 1st Congressional District, has leaned into a blue-collar campaign message, saying constituents like him «know how to work» and «know how to swing a tool.» 

His campaign has focused on affordability, corruption and working-class frustrations, but his lobbying record puts him on the record on several hot-button issues that could undercut his effort to appeal to more centrist voters in a heavily Republican state.

Between 2021 and 2023, Forstag was listed as a registered lobbyist for groups and entities such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood, the Montana Library Association and the City of Missoula. During that time, he testified against or was tied through lobbying records to opposition against bills involving drag performances in schools and libraries, transgender-related medical treatments for minors, boys competing in girls’ sports, voter ID and local cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

Advertisement

FOUR MONTHS TO MIDTERMS: 12 RACES THAT WILL DETERMINE THE SENATE MAJORITY

Sam Forstag, who is running for Congress on a working-class image in one of Montana’s two House districts, has a lobbying career steeped in left-wing culture war issues. (Sam for Montana)

«This bill is the latest of a series that I expect you’ll see that are intended to stir up fear and distrust of our fellow citizens,» Forstag told Montana lawmakers in 2023 as Republicans considered a bill restricting minors from attending drag performances in public schools and libraries. Forstag argued the measure was overly broad and could affect people who are transgender or nonbinary participating in library programming, saying he hoped lawmakers did not intend to «prohibit an entire class of people» from serving in public libraries.

Advertisement

Forstag also opposed SB 99, a bill banning certain gender-transition procedures and medications for minors. In testimony on the bill, Forstag urged lawmakers to «leave personal and medical decisions to families and their chosen health care providers.»

While representing the ACLU of Montana, Forstag was tied to opposition against HB 112, which required student athletes to compete based on biological sex, and SB 169, a measure to increase scrutiny around voter ID protocols.

TRUMP HOLDS WASHINGTON HOSTAGE OVER SAVE ACT AS MIDTERM CLOCK TICKS ON GOP CONTROL

Advertisement
Sadie Schreiner with a trans flag

While representing the ACLU of Montana, Forstag was tied to opposition against HB 112, which required student athletes to compete based on biological sex. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Forstag also opposed bills involving sanctuary policies and local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, including measures aimed at requiring local officials to comply with immigration detainers. 

Forstag did not directly dispute the lobbying record when asked by Fox News Digital, instead defending his work in the state capital as a fight for working people and individual freedom.

«Between fire seasons, I fought for working people in a state capital that too often ignores us,» Forstag told Fox News Digital. «Instead of accepting a system where the extremes and the rich have the loudest voice, I worked my tail off to defend Montanans’ constitutional rights and freedoms and fight for policies that actually improve our lives.»

Advertisement

Forstag framed his opposition to bills involving transgender medical procedures as part of a broader belief that government should stay out of personal decisions.

UNEARTHED RECORDS REVEAL DEM MAYOR SOUGHT TAX HIKE TO FUND DEI ROLE AHEAD OF KEY HOUSE RACE

«I believe the government’s got no place getting involved in peoples’ private, personal decisions,» he said. «Politicians have no place coming for our guns, and no place inserting themselves into medical decisions that should be up to patients, parents, and doctors.»

Advertisement
Trans flag flies over a photo of SCOTUS building

Forstag framed his opposition to bills involving transgender medical procedures as part of a broader belief that government should stay out of personal decisions. (istock)

On immigration, Forstag, who is backed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said local police should not be forced to carry out federal immigration responsibilities.

«Laws that force local law enforcement to do the federal government’s bidding make our communities less safe and put police in a bad spot,» he said. «Immigration enforcement should be left to federal officials so our local police can keep Montanans safe.»

ICE agent

Forstag said local police should not be forced to carry out federal immigration responsibilities. (Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Jake Eaton, a longtime Montana Republican strategist whose clients have included Gov. Greg Gianforte and Attorney General Austin Knudsen, told Fox News Digital that Forstag’s lobbying record could undercut his effort to appeal to blue-collar and swing voters in the district, noting that issues involving transgender policies, schools and immigration «cut across» demographics.

Advertisement

RED-STATE SENATOR DROPS HAMMER ON DEM MAYOR OVER NEW ‘WOKE’ DEI ORDINANCE WHILE VIOLENT CRIME SURGES

Meanwhile, Eaton described Forstag as emblematic of the leftward shift of Montana Democrats.

«There aren’t a lot of moderate Democrats, if any, left,» Eaton said. «The days of Brian Schweitzer, when you had Democrats that were pro-gun and pro-coal, they don’t really exist anymore.»

Advertisement

But Eric Koch, a longtime Democratic consultant, rejected that criticism, arguing that Forstag’s record fits his broader message about keeping government out of personal decisions.

Screencaps reader Montana Tim shows off springtime in Montana.

Forstag will face Flint, an Army veteran and conservative radio host, in the Nov. 3 general election for the open western Montana seat. (OutKick/Screencaps/Montana Tim)

«Sam’s record is about keeping government out of your business,» Koch told Fox News Digital. «No amount of divide-and-distract will change that.» The consultant argued Republicans would rather focus on culture-war issues than Forstag’s economic contrast with his Republican opponent Aaron Flint.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Forstag will face Flint, an Army veteran and conservative radio host, in the Nov. 3 general election for the open western Montana seat currently held by GOP Rep. Ryan Zinke, who announced earlier this year he would not seek re-election. 

Forstag won the Democratic primary after defeating former 2024 gubernatorial nominee Ryan Busse, Russell Cleveland and Matt Rains, while Flint emerged from a Republican primary field that included Montana Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen, former state Sen. Al Olszewski and educator Ray Curtis.

Advertisement

midterm elections, house of representatives, montana, elections, house of representatives politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias