INTERNACIONAL
LA homelessness fraud cases expose deeper problem than stolen millions, oversight hawk warns

Federal charges alleging that millions of dollars were siphoned from Los Angeles homelessness programs are exposing what one lawmaker told Digital is a deeper failure in the way Washington funds and measures such programs.
The latest cases out of Los Angeles fuel the concern of Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas that only are corrupt providers stealing taxpayer money, but that the programs aren’t meeting their goal of getting people off the streets.
«The only people really getting upward mobility in these programs, it would seem, is the people running the programs,» Cloud told Digital after a House Oversight hearing examining federally funded homelessness programs in Los Angeles, Seattle and elsewhere. «And that’s not really what the program’s supposed to be about.»
LA REAL ESTATE VET COMES AT MAYOR BASS WITH RECEIPTS OVER DAMNING HOMELESSNESS REPORT: ‘SHE DOESN’T GET IT’
Federal prosecutors charged three defendants Wednesday in separate homelessness-fraud cases involving alleged misuse of taxpayer funds, including money allegedly spent on a nightclub and adjacent bingo hall and bribes allegedly tied to fake housing referrals.
Los Angeles’ homelessness agency paid one of the suspect nonprofits more than $75 million, according to federal prosecutors, leading Cloud to seek out the real culprits blazing the money trail.
WHITE HOUSE PUSHES ‘WATERSHED’ FRAUD-FIGHTING REFORM IN CONGRESS AS VANCE CONVENES TASK FORCE
Cloud said the fraud itself is only one piece of a broader problem, and that the system appears to reward spending and program activity without adequately measuring lasting outcomes.
Government too often judges success by «how much money we send out the door» instead of whether the spending is «actually helping people» or whether safeguards are in place to ensure taxpayer dollars are being used properly, Cloud said – describing the system as having been «incentivized for fraud.»
«We’ve got to take those incentives out and get back to making sure that all these programs have incentives for oversight and that the dollars are managed well,» Cloud said.
LETITIA JAMES FACES SCRUTINY AFTER NEW YORK CITY SPENDS $81,700 PER HOMELESS PERSON AMID SHELTER SCANDALS
Some programs can keep a person «kind of in a cycle of dependency so that the program manager has job security, in a sense, and gets to live off the government dime,» Cloud said
«You [are seeing] as we begin to look into waste, fraud and abuse, why is it that these Democrat-led states are saying, no, we don’t want the controls in place,» he said, pointing to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass’ decision to step down from the LAHSA commission.
Los Angeles is not alone, he said, citing what has been called the feds’ «Housing First» philosophy – generally prioritizing placing homeless in housing with less immediate regard for sobriety, mental-health treatment or overall stabilizing services.
WATCH: DR. OZ SAYS NEWSOM, OTHER BLUE STATES HAVE TURNED MEDICAID FRAUD INTO A ‘FEATURE’
Cloud did not use the term «Housing First» during the interview, but he described the concern behind that critique, arguing that some homelessness programs define success in ways that leave people dependent on government rather than moving toward independence.
Housing First is distinct from HUD’s «Continuum of Care» framework, which is the local funding and coordination structure through which nonprofit providers, state and local governments and other organizations receive federal homelessness money.
WALZ ADMINISTRATION IGNORED FRAUD WARNINGS AS BILLIONS VANISHED, HOUSE OVERSIGHT REPORT ALLEGES
In Los Angeles, LAHSA leads the local Continuum of Care, which HUD says received nearly $1 billion in taxpayer dollars over the previous five years.
Under Secretary Scott Turner, HUD moved to suspend LAHSA this year, citing alleged failures involving financial management, internal controls and safeguards against conflicts of interest. LAHSA has challenged the federal action in court.
«The ‘housing first’ experiment failed Americans by warehousing the vulnerable without results,» Turner said in June when HUD announced a $4.04 billion Continuum of Care funding opportunity.
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
«This ideology promised to end homelessness. Instead, billions of taxpayer dollars were spent while homelessness increased to record levels.»
That funding will focus on organizations aiding treatment and recovery, while setting aside $1.3 billion for new projects prioritizing transitional housing and supportive services and adding measures intended to prevent fraud, waste and abuse.
homeless crisis, los angeles, social policy, controversies state and local, corruption crime, corruption, reform, republicans
INTERNACIONAL
Violentas protestas en Italia: manifestantes marcharon contra el gobierno de Meloni y hubo enfrentamientos con la policía

Cientos de miles de estudiantes y trabajadores participaron este viernes en una jornada de huelga y movilizaciones en distintas ciudades de Italia. En Roma, la policía realizó varias cargas y utilizó cañones de agua para dispersar a los manifestantes que intentaron acercarse al Parlamento.
Las protestas convocadas este viernes en Italia contra el aumento del costo de vida y las políticas del gobierno de Giorgia Meloni reunieron a cientos de miles de personas en distintas ciudades del país y derivaron en enfrentamientos con las fuerzas de seguridad en Roma y Turín.
Las movilizaciones, protagonizadas principalmente por estudiantes, trabajadores y organizaciones sociales, se desarrollaron en el marco de una huelga general convocada por el sindicato Unione Sindacale di Base (USB).
En la capital italiana, la jornada transcurrió con relativa calma durante la mañana, con una marcha estudiantil y el inicio de una acampada frente al Coliseo, que está previsto que continúe hasta el domingo.
Sin embargo, la tensión aumentó a media tarde, cuando una columna de manifestantes procedente del barrio de Trastevere intentó superar el cordón policial para dirigirse hacia el Parlamento.
Los agentes respondieron con escudos y realizaron varias cargas para dispersar a la multitud en un paso sobre el río Tíber.
Según un primer balance provisional difundido por medios locales, ocho personas fueron retenidas para su identificación. Más tarde, los enfrentamientos se trasladaron a la ribera del río y al barrio de Testaccio, donde algunos manifestantes arrojaron botellas, petardos y otros objetos contra los policías, que utilizaron cañones de agua a presión.
Ante los intentos de acercamiento a las sedes institucionales, las fuerzas de seguridad también bloquearon los accesos a la Piazza Colonna, donde se encuentra el Palacio Chigi, sede del Ejecutivo, y a la Piazza di Montecitorio, donde funciona la Cámara de los Diputados.
Protesta
INTERNACIONAL
Minnesota Dem declined to refer Ilhan Omar for ethics probe despite fellow lawmaker’s 2019 request

Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., directed a Minnesota state lawmaker to the congressional ethics complaint process in 2019 after he urged her to seek an investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., according to correspondence obtained by Digital.
In a 2019 letter, Craig told Steve Drazkowski, then a Minnesota state representative, he could submit a complaint himself to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) if he wanted to pursue an investigation into Omar.
The Office of Congressional Ethics website states that members of the public, advocacy organizations and members of Congress can submit information regarding alleged misconduct to the agency’s Office of Congressional Conduct (OCC).
Complaints may also be submitted to the House Committee on Ethics.
ILHAN OMAR’S TURBULENT WEEK EXPLAINED: THE DUELING PROBES THAT THREW THE SOMALI-BORN PROGRESSIVE INTO CHAOS
Craig wrote, «With respect to your request for an ethics inquiry into Rep. Omar, the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) of the U.S. House of Representatives is the independent, non-partisan entity charged with reviewing allegations of misconduct against Members, officers, and staff of the U.S. House of Representatives and, when appropriate, referring matters to the House Committee on Ethics.
«The OCE accepts and reviews information concerning allegations within its jurisdiction from members of the public.»
Craig’s response came two days after Drazkowski sent her a letter urging her to refer his concerns to the House Ethics Committee, then chaired by former Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla.
Among Drazkowski’s accusations was that Omar filed joint tax returns with Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi in 2014 and 2015, despite the two not being legally married at the time.
Digital obtained a copy of a report by the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board indicating that Omar and Hirsi jointly filed their tax returns in 2014 and 2015.
Omar legally married Ahmed Nur Said Elmi on Feb. 12, 2009, in Hennepin County, Minn., according to Newsweek. Omar and Elmi’s legal divorce proceeding concluded in December 2017. In a 2017 filing from her divorce case obtained by Digital, Omar stated she had not been in contact with Elmi since 2011.
«Representative Craig, I am your constituent. In that capacity, I formally request that you immediately forward the attached material, and open an ethics investigation in the United States House of Representatives regarding actions taken by Rep. Ilhan Omar leading up to the 2018 election,» Drazkowski wrote.
COULD TRUMP REVOKE ILHAN OMAR’S CITIZENSHIP FOR ALLEGED BROTHER MARRIAGE? EX FEDERAL PROSECUTOR BREAKS IT DOWN
«This month, the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board issued a report on Rep. Omar, who found that she broke multiple Minnesota campaign finance laws,» Drazkowski wrote.
Drazkowski told Digital he was first prompted to seek an investigation from the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board into Omar after noticing that she had not filed a required statement of economic interest with the board.
The board confirmed in a statement to Digital that Omar submitted the statement of economic interest after she was made aware that Drazkowski’s complaint triggered an investigation.
Drazkowski said the information he included in two complaints to the board ultimately contributed to the board’s determination that Omar had violated state campaign finance laws.
FEDERAL AGENTS RAID ILHAN OMAR’S DC HOME AMID IMMIGRATION FRAUD INVESTIGATION
On June 6, 2019, the board issued findings after Drazkowski filed two separate complaints. The board found that Omar had improperly used $1,500 in campaign funds to pay for personal tax-related services concerning the tax returns she filed jointly with Hirsi in 2014 and 2015.
The board also required Omar to repay campaign funds she had used to pay for travel to Boston, New York and Washington, D.C.
After the campaign’s 2019 assessment of the violations, Omar stated that she was «glad» the process was over and was «glad» to know that the board did not find her guilty of having used the money for personal use as was first alleged.
After receiving Craig’s response, Drazkowski, who lived in her congressional district, submitted his own complaint seeking an ethics investigation into Omar.
«Please find below my formal request for an investigation into the activities of Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN),» Drazkowski wrote to the Ethics Committee, which he also shared with the OCE.
«The United States of America is a nation of law and order. No one is above the law, and our elected officials must always be held accountable. We demand the highest of ethical standards from every member of Congress.»
Despite submitting his concerns, Drazkowski told Digital he struggled to obtain a substantive response through the congressional ethics process.
He said he subsequently brought his allegations to the FBI’s Minneapolis office after receiving no substantive response from the ethics process or Craig’s office.
«I went to the FBI and unloaded all the information I had to them, including names and phone numbers of people,» Drazkowski told Digital.
Drazkowski said he received no meaningful response from federal investigators and expressed frustration with the bureau’s handling of the information.
The House Ethics Committee and FBI declined Digital’s requests for comment.
Omar and Craig did not respond to Digital’s requests for comment.
politics, ilhan omar, controversies state and local, house of representatives, minnesota
INTERNACIONAL
Las alertas de un tanque de pensamiento sobre el presupuesto 2027 de Guatemala y los riesgos de corrupción y deuda insostenible

El Instituto Centroamericano de Estudios Fiscales (Icefi) planteó al Congreso de Guatemala diez recomendaciones para modificar el proyecto de Presupuesto 2027, identificado como iniciativa 6841.
Entre sus advertencias, pidió no aprobar otro aporte extraordinario para los Consejos Departamentales de Desarrollo (Codede), exigir sustento técnico para obras y revisar el uso de deuda para financiar gasto corriente.
La organización presentó sus observaciones ante la Comisión de Finanzas Públicas y Moneda, durante el análisis del Proyecto de Presupuesto General de Ingresos y Egresos del Estado para 2027.

No sumar otro aporte extraordinario a los Codede
El Icefi recomendó que el Congreso no apruebe un nuevo aporte para los Codede, cuya ejecución presupuestaria alcanzaba solo el 30,9% al 26 de octubre de 2026.
Según el instituto, la asignación total de estas entidades para 2027 podría superar los Q13.000 millones, unos USD 1.701,2 millones.
Un aporte adicional de entre Q5.000 millones y Q7.000 millones, equivalentes a entre USD 654,3 millones y USD 916,1 millones, elevaría el presupuesto a niveles de entre Q17.000 millones y Q20.000 millones, unos USD 2.224,7 millones y USD 2.617,3 millones.

El Icefi sostuvo que la capacidad anual de ejecución de los Codede no superaría los Q8.000 millones, cerca de USD 1.046,9 millones. También alertó sobre riesgos de corrupción, uso político de recursos en el año electoral de 2027 y captura por estructuras del crimen organizado.
Deuda, ONG y proyectos sin estudios técnicos
El centro de estudios pidió revisar el aumento de la deuda pública bonificada y solicitar al Ejecutivo una justificación detallada de su destino, así como estudios sobre sus efectos fiscales y monetarios.
El proyecto prevé financiar con deuda Q22.915 millones, unos USD 2.998,8 millones, de gasto corriente. Esa cifra representa el 53,6% del endeudamiento bonificado solicitado para 2027. El Icefi indicó que ese mecanismo contraviene la prohibición prevista en el artículo 61 de la Ley Orgánica del Presupuesto.
Además, recomendó examinar la legitimidad y pertinencia de las 117 organizaciones no gubernamentales que recibirían aportes directos por Q2.437,4 millones, equivalentes a USD 319 millones, previstos en el artículo 38 de la iniciativa.
El instituto también pidió excluir asignaciones para obras sin código en el Sistema Nacional de Inversión Pública o sin estudios que respalden los fondos solicitados para preinversión y ejecución.
Infraestructura bajo revisión por más de USD 1.500 millones
El Icefi solicitó al Ejecutivo un informe sobre las medidas previstas para mejorar la capacidad de ejecución de inversión en infraestructura. También requirió detalles técnicos, cronogramas y capacidad operativa para cinco rubros.
La lista incluye Q4.800 millones para ampliar Puerto Quetzal, unos USD 628,2 millones; Q800 millones para modernizar el sistema metropolitano de transporte, puertos, aeropuertos y ferrovías, USD 104,7 millones; y Q3.517,6 millones para proyectos viales prioritarios, USD 460,3 millones.
También pidió justificaciones para Q2.550 millones de la Agencia Nacional de Infraestructura, USD 333,7 millones, y Q350 millones para movilidad eléctrica y renovación del transporte de personas, USD 45,8 millones.

Programas sociales y niñez, otro foco de las recomendaciones
El instituto pidió informes sobre beneficiarios, transparencia y riesgos de politización en programas sociales. Entre ellos figuran Q3.015,4 millones para Mano a mano, USD 394,6 millones; Q1.000 millones para primera vivienda, USD 130,9 millones; y Q1.200 millones para agua y saneamiento, USD 157 millones.
La revisión también abarca Q250 millones para innovación tecnológica, USD 32,7 millones; Q150 millones para compra de tierras, USD 19,6 millones; y Q400 millones para el Fondo de Garantía para el Desarrollo, USD 52,3 millones.

El Icefi solicitó elevar la Inversión Pública en Niñez y Adolescencia. Pidió revertir recortes en educación básica, diversificada e inicial, así como en tecnología educativa. También propuso restituir fondos para monitoreo de crecimiento infantil, micronutrientes, vacunación y raciones alimentarias.
El Tribunal Supremo Electoral deberá detallar el uso de fondos
La novena recomendación reclama al Tribunal Supremo Electoral (TSE) un desglose de los aportes especiales destinados a los comicios de 2027: Q500 millones vigentes en 2026, USD 65,4 millones, y Q2.000 millones previstos para 2027, USD 261,7 millones.
Por último, el Icefi pidió corregir la proyección de ingresos tributarios y ajustar los cálculos de “Otros impuestos directos” y “Otros impuestos indirectos” a la recaudación observada.
Guatemala,deuda pública,presupuesto nacional,Centro de Investigaciones Económicas Nacionales
POLITICA2 días agoMalvinas: tras aceptar modificaciones, el Gobierno buscará llevar al recinto el proyecto de Ley de Soberanía el 12 de noviembre
SOCIEDAD2 días agoAvanza la búsqueda de los hermanos desaparecidos que fueron arrastrados por la corriente de un río en Santa Cruz
DEPORTE2 días agoLuis Enrique no tiene al gran ‘killer’ de París: una ‘bestia’ supera a Ferran Torres



















