Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump gets red-carpet welcome in China, but past Beijing trip shows pageantry only goes so far

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Trump received a red-carpet welcome when he landed in Beijing on Wednesday, with a military honor guard, band and children waving American and Chinese flags ahead of high-stakes talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Advertisement

The ceremony also highlighted the bigger question around Trump’s return to China: whether this visit can yield more lasting progress than his 2017 trip, which featured major business announcements but was later followed by a sharp deterioration in U.S.-China trade relations.

The meeting comes as trade tensions, the Iran war and disputes over Taiwan place new pressure on Washington and Beijing to stabilize relations between the world’s two largest economies.

TRUMP HEADS TO BEIJING FOR HIGH-STAKES XI TALKS AS TAIWAN TENSIONS, TRADE DISPUTES TEST US STRENGTH

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump walks with Chinese Vice President Han Zheng during an arrival ceremony at Beijing Capital International Airport in 2026.  (REUTERS/Evan Vucci)

The red carpet was rolled out with a welcome ceremony consisting of military honor guard and a military band with Chinese children waving American and Chinese flags. «Welcome, welcome! Warm welcome!» the children chanted in Chinese.

Trump exited Air Force One and was greeted by United States Ambassador to China David Perdue, Chinese Vice President H.E. Han Zheng, Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to the United States H.E. Xie Feng, and Executive Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs H.E. Ma Zhaoxu.

Advertisement
President Donald Trump and Xi Jinping shaking hands at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing

Trump visited China in 2017 for his first state visit. (Qilai Shen/Bloomberg)

First Lady Melania Trump accompanied Trump nearly nine years ago for his first state visit. The 2017 trip emphasized pomp, personal diplomacy and commercial announcements, and included excursions such as a Forbidden City tour, a Peking opera performance, and a formal welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People.

trumps and chinese first family at forbidden city

Chinese President Xi Jinping  and his wife Peng Liyuan welcome the Trumps in the Forbidden City in 2017.  (Xinhua/Xie Huanchi via Getty Images)

The 2017 trip produced more than $250 billion in announced commercial deals and cooperation pledges, but it did not prevent trade relations from deteriorating in 2018. 

Most notably, Trump announced a $12 billion deal for cellphone chips from Qualcomm and $37 billion for Boeing commercial jets, AP reported at the time.

Advertisement

DONALD TRUMP DETAILS ‘MOST EXCITING PART’ OF CHINA TRADE AGREEMENT

«These deals will create jobs for American workers, farmers, and ranchers by increasing United States exports to China and stimulating investment in American communities,» the White House said at the time.

U.S. President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping greeting attendees outside the Great Hall of the People in Beijing

Trump’s first visit to China focused largely on symbolic diplomacy and major business announcements. (Qilai Shen/Bloomberg)

A strategic focus of his first visit was North Korea’s nuclear program. Trump and Xi agreed at the time that North Korea should not become a nuclear weapons state, declaring the two countries would apply «maximum pressure.»

Advertisement
Trump receives a flower bouquet from a young girl in china

Trump receives a flower bouquet from a young girl upon his arrival at Beijing Capital International Airport. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

China had already tightened enforcement earlier that year, including suspending North Korean coal imports, while Trump later said Chinese banks were scaling back business with North Korean entities. But U.S.-China cooperation weakened as broader trade tensions escalated, and North Korea continued advancing its missile and nuclear programs.

The summit did not prevent a sharp deterioration in trade relations the following year, after Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese imports, triggering a prolonged trade standoff.

U.S. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania arrive for the state dinner with China's President Xi Jinping and China's first lady Peng Liyuan at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, November 9, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst - RC1DEB132E70

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arriving for a state dinner last November with China’s President Xi Jinping and China’s first lady Peng Liyuan in Beijing in 2017.  (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst, File)

Trump’s latest visit comes after a broader tariff escalation in which his administration imposed sweeping duties on imports from dozens of countries, with China emerging as the central flashpoint after Beijing retaliated and later tightened export controls on rare earth minerals, prompting Trump to threaten an additional 100% tariff on Chinese goods.

Advertisement

Trump is expected to press Xi on trade once again, suggesting that American entrepreneurs and executives could help drive growth inside China if Beijing lowers barriers and allows U.S. firms more room to operate.

TRUMP WARNS CHINA OF ‘STAGGERING’ 50% TARIFF IF CAUGHT SUPPLYING MILITARY AID TO IRAN

Accompanying Trump on the trip are top U.S. executives, including Elon Musk, Apple CEO Tim Cook, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, Cargill CEO Brian Sikes, Citi CEO Jane Fraser, GE Aerospace CEO Larry Culp, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra, and Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon.

Advertisement

Iran is expected to be among the issues surrounding the talks, though Trump has downplayed differences with Xi over the war.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Trump and Xi will hold bilateral talks and a formal banquet Thursday.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Eric Mack and Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

donald trump, north korea, china, war with iran, xi jinping

INTERNACIONAL

Blue state shield laws allowed 330K abortion pills to be sent to abortion ban states, pro-life group finds

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: A pro-life group has released a new report marking the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade, finding that nearly 330,000 abortion pills have been shipped to states with abortion restrictions since the summer of 2023 under the protection of blue state shield laws, which the report says enabled abortion numbers in several conservative states to remain at or above pre-Dobbs levels.

Advertisement

In the report obtained by Fox News Digital, the Restoration of America Foundation (ROAF) said more than 328,000 abortion pills have been sent into states with abortion restrictions from out-of-state between July 2023 and December 2025, citing the Society of Family Planning’s #WeCount data project. According to the report, monthly shipments of chemical abortion pills into pro-life states nearly tripled during that period, jumping from 5,400 pills sent in July 2023 to 14,870 in December 2025.

The report concluded that out-of-state abortion providers send nearly 15,000 chemical abortion pills per month to states with abortion restrictions.

This comes after the nation’s highest court overturned the landmark 1973 case Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, returning the power to make laws on abortion access back to the states.

Advertisement

PRO-LIFE GROUP FINDS BIDEN-ERA FDA POLICY IS DRIVING 500 ABORTIONS PER DAY, SAYS TRUMP HAS POWER TO END IT

The Restoration of America Foundation (ROAF) said more than 328,000 abortion pills have been sent to states with abortion restrictions from out-of-state between July 2023 and December 2025. (Charlie Neibergall/AP)

In an interview with Fox News Digital, ROAF CEO Doug Truax said the Biden administration eased safety standards for abortion medication and «pro-death» Democrats adopted shield laws to protect providers in blue states from being prosecuted by red state governments.

Advertisement

«Years ago, the pro-death Biden administration and the pro-death Democrat Party writ large … they knew what we knew: that Roe was bad law, and it was going to go,» he said. «And so they started thinking ahead of what they’re going to do here.»

Truax accused the Biden administration of loosening safety standards around Mifepristone – «the abortion pill.»

«It used to be that you had to go see a doctor to get it. They took that off and said you could just get it through the mail,» Truax said. 

Advertisement

«The second thing was the pro-death blue states started implementing the shield laws, which is the focus of the paper that we’ve got out now, which are basically the laws that prevent people in red states from going after the people in the blue states that are sending the abortion pills into the red states,» Truax said. 

He argued that the U.S. is «worse off than we were from a numbers standpoint.»

«So they’ve set up an apparatus here that enables them to keep pushing more and more abortions on everybody around the country in spite of it … It’s just created this basically constitutional disorder with all these states doing whatever they want and being able to get away with it because of the shield laws.»

Advertisement

Despite Roe v. Wade being overturned four years ago, nine states with abortion restrictions — Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota and Texas — recorded more monthly abortions in 2025 than they did in 2022 before the court’s decision.

Republican leaders in states such as Texas and Louisiana have attempted to pursue legal action against out-of-state abortion providers, although efforts to extradite providers have been unsuccessful after governors in states like California and New York stepped in.

Boxes of mifepristone drug on a shelf at West Alabama Women's Center in Tuscaloosa

The report concluded that out-of-state abortion providers send nearly 15,000 chemical abortion pills per month to states with abortion restrictions. (Allen G. Breed/AP Photo)

«The data now shows that mail-order abortion is overwhelming the ability of states to protect unborn life,» the ROAF report reads.

Advertisement

The report argues that while Republican state officials have struggled in efforts to pursue abortion providers in other states, the Trump administration can take immediate federal action to reduce the shipments of abortion pills into states with abortion restrictions by reversing Biden-era changes to FDA regulations that allowed abortion pills to be prescribed through telehealth and delivered by mail. 

It also calls on the Justice Department to rescind the Biden-era memorandum on the Comstock Act and enforce existing federal laws governing the mailing of abortion drugs.

«While the success of state attempts in escalating court cases is uncertain, Trump Administration officials can act now to prevent online providers from sending dangerous abortion pills into every state,» the report reads.

Advertisement

Truax even stressed that President Donald Trump, who has claimed to be the most pro-life president in U.S. history, could end up as the «most pro-death president» if he fails to make changes to stop the flow of abortion pills to conservative states across the country.

«President Trump has said repeatedly he’s going to be the most pro-life president ever. Well, that’s in serious jeopardy right now. We have got a situation where the number of abortions is going up, up, up. And on this trend line, if nothing changes, he’s going to go out as the most pro-death president we’ve ever had because of the way this is trending. So we’re trying to help [the administration] understand this and say we’ve got to make some changes,» he said.

«We’re all about no more abortions. But if you get to a place where it’s back to the states, at least the red states have got the ability now going forward to do what they want and do what the people in their state want their state to do, but that’s not what’s happening. So it’s creating constitutional disorder. We have to say, what’s the point of a state law if it’s not enforced in any way? Some other state can basically just come in and just be completely lawless and do whatever they want in your state, even though you’ve got the state law that says they can’t do that, but they’re still doing it and nobody’s stopping them,» Truax added.

Advertisement

BLUE STATE’S ABORTION-PILL SHIELD LAW HARMS WOMEN BY DEPRIVING FOLLOW-UP CARE, PRO-LIFE DOCS SAY

President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. looking on as FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary speaks in the White House Roosevelt Room

ROAF CEO Doug Truax stressed that President Donald Trump could end up as the «most pro-death president» if he fails to make changes to stop the flow of abortion pills. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The report says that 22 states and Washington, D.C., have adopted some form of abortion shield law, including eight states explicitly protecting providers who prescribe abortion medication through telehealth to patients in states with abortion restrictions.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

In 2025, #WeCount identified 169,000 abortions provided under shield laws to states with restrictive laws.

«If pro-life states have no power to protect their women and babies from rogue abortionists thousands of miles away, the situation they find themselves in is not better than before the Dobbs decision—it’s worse. For the sake of our constitutional order, to say nothing of the women and babies in peril, Trump Administration officials must act swiftly and decisively to end interstate mail-order abortion,» the report concludes.

abortion, states rights, governors, republicans, donald trump, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Estados Unidos aumenta la presión sobre Cuba: más sanciones a empresas y un guiño a la petrolera Exxon Mobil

Published

on


Estados Unidos aumentó este martes la presión sobre el gobierno de Cuba. Por un lado, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos dictaminó que la petrolera estadounidense Exxon Mobil puede demandar a empresas estatales cubanas por bienes en la isla que fueron incautados tras la toma del poder de Fidel Castro. Por otra parte, el Departamento de Estado sancionó a cinco entidades estatales cubanas además de señalar a la esposa de uno de los hijos del ex presidente Raúl Castro.

La decisión de la Corte Suprema sobre Exxon fue de 6 a 3, con la mayoría automática conservadora que votó a favor de la petrolera y suma presión sobre la isla, que podría sufrir demandas similares de empresas estadounidenses cuyos bienes fueron confiscados hace 65 años.

Advertisement

Exxon Mobil busca una compensación por la confiscación de activos propiedad de filiales de Standard Oil, predecesora de Exxon Mobil, incluyendo más de 100 estaciones de servicio y una refinería de petróleo.

La cuestión era si la ley de 1996 conocida como Helms-Burton elimina el escudo frente a demandas en tribunales estadounidenses que normalmente cubren países extranjeros y empresas estatales. Los jueces revocaron una sentencia de un tribunal inferior que determinaba que las empresas estatales cubanas están inmunes a demandas en tribunales estadounidenses.

El Título III de la ley permite a los estadounidenses demandar a casi cualquier empresa que ejerza actividad comercial o se beneficie de propiedades confiscadas por el gobierno cubano. Antes del primer gobierno de Trump, todos los presidentes habían suspendido la disposición debido a objeciones de aliados estadounidenses que hacían negocios en Cuba y al efecto en futuros acuerdos negociados entre EE. UU. y Cuba.

Advertisement

Pero Trump levantó la suspensión en 2019, y Exxon Mobil presentó su demanda ese mismo día. Ahora la Corte votó a su favor.

Por otra parte, Estados Unidos sancionó este martes a cinco entidades estatales cubanas, tres de ellas vinculadas al conglomerado militar empresarial Gaesa y dos relacionadas con minería y metalurgia, además de señalar a la esposa de uno de los hijos del expresidente Raúl Castro, Annalie Lilliam Rueda Cardero.

«Hoy, el Departamento de Estado designa a cinco entidades y a una persona para impulsar los esfuerzos integrales de la Administración Trump destinados a poner fin a las actividades malignas del régimen cubano, tanto en Cuba como en todo nuestro hemisferio», indicó el Gobierno estadounidense en un comunicado.

Advertisement

“La situación en Cuba se deteriora a medida que el régimen comunista de la isla, corrupto, brutal y antiestadounidense, sigue priorizando su control absoluto sobre la libertad, las oportunidades y el bienestar básico del pueblo cubano”, señaló.

Más sanciones

Y se refirió concretamente al conglomerado GAESA, que es controlado por el régimen cubano y que ha sido señalado previamente por el secretario de Estado Marco Rubio de desviar sus fondos para la corrupción de los dirigentes cubanos. EE.UU. ya había sancionado a esa empresa, pero ahora avanzó con entidades que trabajan con esa compañía.

Advertisement

“El conglomerado GAESA, controlado por los militares cubanos, ha servido persistentemente como principal instrumento para que las élites del régimen roben los escasos recursos de la isla, desviándolos para la represión, la subversión antiestadounidense y el espionaje, en lugar de destinarlos a escuelas, centrales eléctricas y necesidades básicas para el pueblo cubano”, señaló el comunicado.

“Hoy, he designado entidades adicionales de la red de GAESA asociadas con el movimiento de su dinero y sus activos físicos, así como entidades responsables de la explotación de las reservas minerales y metálicas de Cuba para obtener ganancias ilícitas. Cualquier persona que preste servicios a estos actores sancionados corre el riesgo de ser sancionada. Los bancos extranjeros y otras empresas que presten servicios a estas entidades deben suspender dichas actividades de inmediato”.

Una persona caminando frente a las imágenes del presidente de Cuba, Miguel Diaz-Canel, el general y ex presidente Raúl Castro, y el fallecido expresidente de Cuba Fidel Castro en La Habana (Cuba). Foto EFE

Las entidades sancionadas y vinculadas a Gaesa son Rafin y Banco Financiero Internacional (BFI) dos instituciones financieras que, según el secretario de Estado Marco Rubio, «se dedican a mover dinero en nombre del régimen», y Almacenes Universales, entidad logística que incluye actividades portuarias.

Las restantes son la Empresa Siderúrgica José Martí, la mayor productora de acero bruto de Cuba, y GeoMinera, una compañía estatal que gestiona activos de minerales metálicos con inversión de la australiana Antilles Gold y otras entidades extranjeras.

Advertisement

Además, Washington sancionó a Annalie Lilliam Rueda Cardero, esposa de Alejandro Castro Espín, exjefe de los servicios de inteligencia cubanos e hijo de Raúl Castro, este último acusado en EE.UU. por el derribo de avionetas del exilio cubanoestadounidense en 1996.

Estas nuevas acciones se unen a las sanciones contra el actual presidente cubano, Miguel Díaz-Canel, y al propio Castro Espín, en medio de la escalada de tensiones de Washington sobre La Habana en busca de cambios económicos y políticos.

Trump ha lanzado una campaña de sanciones y presión política para ahogar al régimen cubano, cuya crisis económica se ha agravado por la falta de ayuda del régimen venezolano y por el bloqueo del crudo estadounidense, además de las medidas que decretó Trump en mayo contra compañías extranjeras que operan en distintos sectores de Cuba.

Advertisement

Más allá de la presión económica, la justicia estadounidense ha procesado al ex presidente Raúl Castro y Trump ha amenazado varias veces con intervenir la isla.

En medio de este panorama delicado, el gobierno cubano lanzó días atrás un paquete de 176 propuestas de reformas liberales que abarcan la organización de las empresas privadas, las empresas estatales, el sistema bancario, el turismo, la agricultura, la inversión extranjera, los impuestos y el mercado cambiario. Los expertos consideran que es la reforma más profunda lanzada en 70 años.

“La realidad nos impone cambios urgentes y necesarios”, dijo el presidente Miguel Díaz Canel.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Far-left surge: Mamdani-backed candidates oust Dem establishment incumbents

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

New York City’s socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani did it again.

Advertisement

One year after sending political shock waves across the country with his New York City Democratic primary victory on his way to winning election as mayor of the nation’s most populous city, Mamdani tested the limits of his political powers.

And he easily passed the test, upending the Democratic Party establishment as a trio of Mamdani-endorsed far-left congressional candidates won their primaries over more moderate incumbents and rivals.

Mamdani was the biggest winner on Tuesday, but President Donald Trump also covered his bases, as New York, Maryland, Utah and South Carolina held primaries and runoff elections.

Advertisement

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

Congressional candidates Claire Valdez, Brad Lander, Darializa Avila Chevalier, and Mayor Zohran Mamdani raise their hands during a Get Out the Vote rally at King’s Theater in New York City on June 18, 2026. Sen. Bernie Sanders joined Mamdani ahead of the primary and early voting to campaign for the candidates challenging incumbents in Democratic primary contests. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Democrats lurching left

Advertisement

The mayor’s most shocking victory came in New York’s 13th Congressional District, where Mamdani-backed candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier, a 32-year-old community organizer and democratic socialist, narrowly topped incumbent Democrat Adriano Espaillat, the 71-year-old Congressional Hispanic Caucus chair and the first Dominican American elected to the U.S. House.

Espaillat, who has been in Congress for a decade, was supported by a slew of party leaders, including New York Gov. Kathy Hochul.

MAMDANI-BACKED SOCIALIST WITH HISTORY OF ANTI-AMERICAN RHETORIC WINS VICIOUS DEM PRIMARY RACE

Advertisement

In the race to succeed retiring Democratic Rep. Nydia Velazquez, Mamdani-endorsed state Assembly Member Claire Valdez, who is also aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America, downed Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso by double digits. Reynoso, who was supported by Velazquez, was downed by more than 20 points.

«Tonight, we haven’t just won an election. We have declared that this movement is durable — that it is growing, and that it will not stop until working people are no longer asked to just build the table, no longer just offered a seat at the table, but will run the table,» Valdez said in declaring victory.

And a third Mamdani-backed congressional candidate, progressive Brad Lander, crushed incumbent Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman. Lander, the former New York City comptroller, ran against Mamdani last year in the crowded Democratic primary field but became one of his biggest backers in the general election.

Advertisement

Chevalier, Valdez, and Lander showcased the mayor’s platform of focusing on affordability in a city with one of the nation’s highest costs of living. And all three were very critical of Israel.

MAMDANI STANDS BY FELLOW SOCIALIST CANDIDATE DESPITE RESURFACED FAR-LEFT, ANTI-AMERICAN POSTS

Lander, who is Jewish, said in his victory speech, «You can criticize Israel and not be antisemitic. You can be an anti-Zionist and not be antisemitic

Advertisement

It was a risky bet for Mamdani, just six months into his tenure as New York City mayor, to take on the establishment, but he comes out of the primary as an emboldened kingmaker in the party.

Mamdani, who campaigned relentlessly for all three congressional candidates, had emphasized that the Democratic Party «must change.»

And on Tuesday night, at the Valdez primary celebration, the mayor said, «Let’s hear it for a politics…that will never forget working people. For a politics that is ready to write a new chapter in our party’s history, and for a politics that realizes the old politics that got us to this crisis, is not the politics that’s going to get us out of this crisis.»

Advertisement

Progressive Rep. Ro Khanna of California, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential contender, said that the results in New York City «shows we have a new party.»

But the results also give Republicans, who have long cast Mamdani as a radical, more ammunition to use him as a cudgel as they work to hold their razor-thin House majority in this year’s midterm elections.

REPUBLICANS RELENTLESSLY USE MAMDANI AS SOCIALIST CUDGEL TO BASH VULNERABLE DEMOCRATS

Advertisement

«Tonight wasn’t just a bad night for so-called ‘Leader’ Hakeem Jeffries. It was the night the Democrat establishment officially surrendered to Zohran Mamdani and the socialist wing of their party. Every House Democrat, in safe and competitive districts alike, will now answer to the radicals calling the shots. And Americans should be terrified by where the Democrat Party is headed,» National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Mike Marinella argued in a statement.

Trump wins again

The power of the Trump endorsement in GOP primaries was tested again, this time in New York.

Advertisement

And the president prevailed.

Trump-backed first-time candidate Anthony Constantino, a businessman and former boxer, defeated Robert Smullen, a retired Marine Corps colonel and New York assemblyman who had the backing of the state party, in the upstate New York race to succeed retiring GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik.

Meanwhile, in South Carolina’s Republican gubernatorial runoff, Trump couldn’t lose.

Advertisement

That’s because he endorsed both candidates in the race to succeed term-limited GOP Gov. Henry McMaster.

State Attorney General Alan Wilson defeated Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette in a landslide.

TRUMP CAN’T LOSE IN HIGH PROFILE REPUBLICAN RUNOFF

Advertisement

Trump endorsed Evette late last month, a week and a half before the gubernatorial primary.

Evette finished on top of a crowded field of contenders in the primary election, with Wilson second. The field also included Reps. Nancy Mace and Ralph Norman, and multimillionaire businessman Rom Reddy. Since no candidate won a majority of the vote, as the top two finishers, Evette and Wilson advanced to Tuesday’s runoff.

Mace and Norman endorsed Wilson after failing to advance to the runoff. And Wilson was also backed a week ago by Sen. Ted Cruz, the conservative firebrand from Texas.

Advertisement

Trump, meanwhile, made an 11th-hour endorsement on Friday, backing Wilson in addition to his earlier endorsement of Evette, in what appeared to be a move by the president to hedge his bet.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Wilson, who topped Evette by a more than two-to-one margin as the votes continued to be counted, gave a shout-out to the president in his victory speech.

Advertisement

«I believe he recognized what we’ve been doing,» Wilson said of Trump. «I think he saw the fight in our campaign and the energy in our campaign. I think he likes a fight. I think that’s what won him over.»

democrats elections, midterm elections, donald trump, governors, zohran mamdani, republicans elections

Continue Reading

Tendencias