Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Trump won’t rule out Kharg Island takeover: What a US assault could look like

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Hundreds of U.S. Marines storm ashore as helicopters thunder overhead, Navy warships and fighter jets establish overwhelming air and sea superiority, and commanders issue one final warning to Iranian forces: surrender or be overrun.

Advertisement

That is how military experts envision the opening hours of a potential U.S. operation to seize Iran’s Kharg Island—the tiny but strategically vital island that handles roughly 90% of the Islamic Republic’s crude oil exports and has become the centerpiece of Washington’s economic pressure campaign against Tehran.

The scenario was thrust back into the spotlight Tuesday after President Donald Trump declined to rule out taking the island. «I can’t say that to you because if I did, it would be foolish,» Trump told Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst during an exclusive interview on ‘Special Report’ when asked directly whether he planned to seize Kharg island. He added that previous U.S. strikes intentionally avoided the island’s oil facilities because they are «a chunk of the world economy.»

TRUMP HAS 3 CHOICES TO DEFINE VICTORY IF HE WANTS TO BEAT IRAN. NONE OF THEM ARE EASY

Advertisement

Satellite view of Kharg Island, located in the Persian Gulf off the coast of Iran. (Gallo Images/Orbital Horizon/Copernicus Sentinel Data 2024)

«There are a lot of ways to skin this cat,» Vice Adm. (Ret.) Robert Harward, former deputy commander of U.S. Central Command, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

Harward explained a Marine Expeditionary Unit could conduct an amphibious assault while U.S. naval and air forces establish complete control over the battlespace, giving Iranian defenders an opportunity to surrender before major fighting begins. The goal, he said, would not simply be to capture the island but to preserve the oil infrastructure that could one day serve a post-Islamic Republic government.

Advertisement

«The real objective at the end of the day is to minimize risk,» said Harward. «Not only to your own forces, but to the people you’re coming in contact with,» while also limiting damage to facilities that could eventually be handed over to «a government of Iran that is focused on supporting its people, as opposed to proliferating the Islamic Revolution.»

Trump’s remarks echoed Harward’s assessment that preserving Kharg’s oil facilities would likely be a key military objective. Trump said he had instructed U.S. forces during previous strikes to «hit everything, but the oil,» explaining that damaging the export terminal could have significant consequences for the global economy.

HOW IRAN ATTACKS ARE FORCING THE PENTAGON TO RETHINK ITS DECADES-OLD MIDDLE EAST BASE STRATEGY

Advertisement
A helicopter lands on the Veronica III vessel at sea.

U.S. forces conduct a right-of-visit, maritime interdiction and boarding of the Veronica III without incident in the INDOPACOM area of responsibility after the vessel allegedly tried to defy President Trump’s quarantine, Feb. 15, 2026. (X/@DeptofWar)

But military experts say capturing Kharg may be the easiest part of the mission.

Located just 16 miles off Iran’s Gulf coast, the eight-square-mile island sits well within range of Iranian missiles, drones and shore-based anti-ship weapons. While analysts believe U.S. forces could likely seize the island within hours, holding it against sustained retaliation from the nearby mainland could require a far larger and longer military commitment—raising the risk of direct war with Iran itself.

Kharg’s strategic importance predates Iran’s modern oil industry. British forces briefly occupied the island during confrontations with Persia over Herat in 1838 and again during the Anglo-Persian War in 1856, using its location near the Iranian coast to apply pressure on Tehran. Nearly a century later, Iran selected Kharg as a deep-water oil terminal because its sheltered waters could accommodate large tankers. Construction began in the late 1950s, and the terminal entered service in 1960, transforming the island into the principal outlet for Iranian crude.

Advertisement

«Everybody talks about seizing Kharg,» Nicholas Carl, assistant director of the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute, told Fox News Digital. «Iran has spent decades investing in denial capabilities designed specifically to keep U.S. forces away from its shores.» Those capabilities include anti-ship cruise missiles, drones, naval mines and hundreds of fast attack craft designed to overwhelm superior naval forces.

IRAN’S BIGGEST WEAPON AGAINST THE US MAY BE SLIPPING AWAY, EXPERTS SAY

A satellite image of Iranian oil infrastructure on Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf.

A satellite image shows an oil terminal at Kharg Island, Iran, February 25, 2026. (2026 Planet Labs PBC/Handout via Reuters)

Military planners have long viewed Iran’s anti-access strategy as one of the most sophisticated in the Middle East. Rather than matching the U.S. Navy ship for ship, Tehran has invested heavily in asymmetric weapons intended to make any amphibious assault costly.

Advertisement

Harward, a former member of the National Security Council and current member of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America’s Iran Policy Project, acknowledged that once American forces were on Kharg, the primary danger would shift from conventional naval combat to missile and drone attacks launched from the nearby mainland.

«Iran doesn’t really have air power,» Harward said. «The concern is whether they launch missiles and drones at the island with U.S. forces on the ground. That’s the biggest risk.»

Harward said the viability of the operation would ultimately depend on intelligence about the number and disposition of Iranian forces, whether they had prepared booby traps or improvised explosive devices, and how Tehran might respond once American troops were ashore.

Advertisement

Still, he argued, such retaliation would come at a price for Tehran.

«If they start striking Kharg itself, they become accountable for damaging their own economic lifeline,» he said.

The challenge illustrates the distinction between tactical success and strategic success. Seizing an eight-square-mile island is one military problem. Defending it against sustained attacks only a short distance from Iranian territory is another.

Advertisement
Oil

A general view of the Port of Kharg Island Oil Terminal, 25 km from the Iranian coast in the Persian Gulf and 483 km northwest of the Strait of Hormuz, in Iran on March 12, 2017. (Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

Harward suggested Washington still has several options short of launching an amphibious assault.

With the U.S.-led blockade, reinforced Tuesday, already constraining Iran’s oil exports, he argued that additional economic pressure could target overland transportation routes, border crossings and air traffic instead of committing ground troops.

«There is still a lot you could do to enhance the economic challenges to Iran,» Harward said. «Synchronizing military, economic and political pressure is really the strategy.»

Advertisement

Some strategists have also questioned whether Kharg is the most valuable military objective.

Mark Fox, a retired Vice Admiral and a former commander of the 5th Fleet, previously told Fox News Digital that Kharg is fundamentally an oil terminal rather than a military fortress. Instead, he argued, smaller islands such as Greater Tunb, Lesser Tunb and Abu Musa—disputed islands near the Strait of Hormuz—could present more manageable military objectives while creating a significant strategic dilemma for Tehran because of their location along one of the world’s most important shipping lanes.

For Harward, however, the larger question extends beyond any single island.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Export oil pipelines run across an industrial facility on Kharg Island along Iran’s Persian Gulf coast.

Export oil pipelines are seen at an oil facility on Kharg Island, on the shore of the Gulf, Feb. 23, 2016. (Str/AFP Via Getty Images)

«I think the only real end state to ensure long-term stability and security in the region is a government of Iran that renounces the Islamic Revolution and focuses on the Iranian people,» he said. That would require ending Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, halting support for proxy groups, protecting freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz and ending the regime’s domestic repression.

Whether Washington ever decides to seize Kharg, military planners agree on one point: Capturing Iran’s economic lifeline would likely be measured in hours, but successfully holding it—and managing the regional escalation that could follow — would be a far longer and more complex campaign.

Advertisement



war with iran, military, us air force, us navy

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Montana Dem running as blue-collar smokejumper spent years lobbying for far-left groups

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Democrat running in a key Montana House race as a «smokejumper» and working-class outsider previously worked as a registered lobbyist opposing state-level bills that would have restricted drag performances in public schools and libraries, banned gender-transition procedures for minors and cracked down on sanctuary policies, records reviewed by Fox News Digital show.

Advertisement

Sam Forstag, the Democratic nominee in Montana’s 1st Congressional District, has leaned into a blue-collar campaign message, saying constituents like him «know how to work» and «know how to swing a tool.» 

His campaign has focused on affordability, corruption and working-class frustrations, but his lobbying record puts him on the record on several hot-button issues that could undercut his effort to appeal to more centrist voters in a heavily Republican state.

Between 2021 and 2023, Forstag was listed as a registered lobbyist for groups and entities such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood, the Montana Library Association and the City of Missoula. During that time, he testified against or was tied through lobbying records to opposition against bills involving drag performances in schools and libraries, transgender-related medical treatments for minors, boys competing in girls’ sports, voter ID and local cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

Advertisement

FOUR MONTHS TO MIDTERMS: 12 RACES THAT WILL DETERMINE THE SENATE MAJORITY

Sam Forstag, who is running for Congress on a working-class image in one of Montana’s two House districts, has a lobbying career steeped in left-wing culture war issues. (Sam for Montana)

«This bill is the latest of a series that I expect you’ll see that are intended to stir up fear and distrust of our fellow citizens,» Forstag told Montana lawmakers in 2023 as Republicans considered a bill restricting minors from attending drag performances in public schools and libraries. Forstag argued the measure was overly broad and could affect people who are transgender or nonbinary participating in library programming, saying he hoped lawmakers did not intend to «prohibit an entire class of people» from serving in public libraries.

Advertisement

Forstag also opposed SB 99, a bill banning certain gender-transition procedures and medications for minors. In testimony on the bill, Forstag urged lawmakers to «leave personal and medical decisions to families and their chosen health care providers.»

While representing the ACLU of Montana, Forstag was tied to opposition against HB 112, which required student athletes to compete based on biological sex, and SB 169, a measure to increase scrutiny around voter ID protocols.

TRUMP HOLDS WASHINGTON HOSTAGE OVER SAVE ACT AS MIDTERM CLOCK TICKS ON GOP CONTROL

Advertisement
Sadie Schreiner with a trans flag

While representing the ACLU of Montana, Forstag was tied to opposition against HB 112, which required student athletes to compete based on biological sex. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Forstag also opposed bills involving sanctuary policies and local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, including measures aimed at requiring local officials to comply with immigration detainers. 

Forstag did not directly dispute the lobbying record when asked by Fox News Digital, instead defending his work in the state capital as a fight for working people and individual freedom.

«Between fire seasons, I fought for working people in a state capital that too often ignores us,» Forstag told Fox News Digital. «Instead of accepting a system where the extremes and the rich have the loudest voice, I worked my tail off to defend Montanans’ constitutional rights and freedoms and fight for policies that actually improve our lives.»

Advertisement

Forstag framed his opposition to bills involving transgender medical procedures as part of a broader belief that government should stay out of personal decisions.

UNEARTHED RECORDS REVEAL DEM MAYOR SOUGHT TAX HIKE TO FUND DEI ROLE AHEAD OF KEY HOUSE RACE

«I believe the government’s got no place getting involved in peoples’ private, personal decisions,» he said. «Politicians have no place coming for our guns, and no place inserting themselves into medical decisions that should be up to patients, parents, and doctors.»

Advertisement
Trans flag flies over a photo of SCOTUS building

Forstag framed his opposition to bills involving transgender medical procedures as part of a broader belief that government should stay out of personal decisions. (istock)

On immigration, Forstag, who is backed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said local police should not be forced to carry out federal immigration responsibilities.

«Laws that force local law enforcement to do the federal government’s bidding make our communities less safe and put police in a bad spot,» he said. «Immigration enforcement should be left to federal officials so our local police can keep Montanans safe.»

ICE agent

Forstag said local police should not be forced to carry out federal immigration responsibilities. (Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Jake Eaton, a longtime Montana Republican strategist whose clients have included Gov. Greg Gianforte and Attorney General Austin Knudsen, told Fox News Digital that Forstag’s lobbying record could undercut his effort to appeal to blue-collar and swing voters in the district, noting that issues involving transgender policies, schools and immigration «cut across» demographics.

Advertisement

RED-STATE SENATOR DROPS HAMMER ON DEM MAYOR OVER NEW ‘WOKE’ DEI ORDINANCE WHILE VIOLENT CRIME SURGES

Meanwhile, Eaton described Forstag as emblematic of the leftward shift of Montana Democrats.

«There aren’t a lot of moderate Democrats, if any, left,» Eaton said. «The days of Brian Schweitzer, when you had Democrats that were pro-gun and pro-coal, they don’t really exist anymore.»

Advertisement

But Eric Koch, a longtime Democratic consultant, rejected that criticism, arguing that Forstag’s record fits his broader message about keeping government out of personal decisions.

Screencaps reader Montana Tim shows off springtime in Montana.

Forstag will face Flint, an Army veteran and conservative radio host, in the Nov. 3 general election for the open western Montana seat. (OutKick/Screencaps/Montana Tim)

«Sam’s record is about keeping government out of your business,» Koch told Fox News Digital. «No amount of divide-and-distract will change that.» The consultant argued Republicans would rather focus on culture-war issues than Forstag’s economic contrast with his Republican opponent Aaron Flint.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Forstag will face Flint, an Army veteran and conservative radio host, in the Nov. 3 general election for the open western Montana seat currently held by GOP Rep. Ryan Zinke, who announced earlier this year he would not seek re-election. 

Forstag won the Democratic primary after defeating former 2024 gubernatorial nominee Ryan Busse, Russell Cleveland and Matt Rains, while Flint emerged from a Republican primary field that included Montana Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen, former state Sen. Al Olszewski and educator Ray Curtis.

Advertisement

midterm elections, house of representatives, montana, elections, house of representatives politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump da marcha atrás con el peaje en el Estrecho de Ormuz un día después de haberlo anunciado

Published

on


Apenas un día después de haberlo anunciado, el presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, dijo el martes que descartó el gravamen que dijo que aplicaría a los barcos que transitan por el estratégico estrecho de Ormuz y señaló que lo sustituiría por acuerdos comerciales con los aliados del Golfo.

El anuncio de la imposición del peaje de un 20%, que había revelado el lunes, había causado un impacto inmediato en el precio del petróleo, que trepó cerca de un 10% en unas horas. Por ese estrecho circula no solo un quinto del petróleo mundial sino también insumos estratégicos para fertilizantes y tecnología.

Advertisement

«He decidido reemplazar la ‘Tarifa de Reembolso a Estados Unidos’ del 20% por acuerdos comerciales y de inversión que los diversos Estados del Golfo llevarán a cabo con Estados Unidos», declaró Trump en su red social, Truth Social.

En un largo posteo, en el que ignoró los recientes ataques de Irán a buques petroleros en el Estrecho de Ormuz, Trump describió que «el petróleo fluye como nunca antes, gracias al impresionante poder de las Fuerzas Armadas de los Estados Unidos».

Dedicó «un saludo especial al Secretario de Guerra, Pete Hegseth; al Presidente del Estado Mayor Conjunto, Dan Caine; y al Comandante del Mando Central de los Estados Unidos, el almirante Brad Cooper. Gracias a ellos, y a todos los miembros de las fuerzas armadas más poderosas del mundo -con diferencia-, el estrecho de Ormuz está abierto a todo el tráfico marítimo, excepto para Irán».

Advertisement

Trump había anunciado el lunes un nuevo bloqueo a Irán en el Estrecho de Ormuz para impedir la salida e ingreso de barcos de puertos iraníes junto con la imposición de un peaje del 20% al tránsito en el estrecho, algo que Estados Unidos siempre rechazó y criticó a Irán por imponer uno.

En su posteo de este martes, Trump acusó a Irán de tener «sus dirigentes mentirosos, violentos y maliciosos, que los conducen por el camino de la destrucción total».

«Por consiguiente -confirmó-, estableceremos un bloqueo total, pero únicamente para los barcos que se dirijan a puertos iraníes o procedan de ellos, o que transporten cualquier mercancía relacionada con Irán».

Advertisement

Luego anunció que no aplicará el peaje que había propuesto, que en realidad nunca llegó a estar en vigor. «Tras conversaciones muy productivas con los líderes de Oriente Medio, he decidido sustituir la tasa de reembolso del 20% a Estados Unidos por acuerdos comerciales y de inversión que los distintos Estados del Golfo llevarán a cabo en nuestro país”.

«Dichas inversiones -agregó- serán masivas pero, al mismo tiempo, extraordinariamente beneficiosas para ellos y para su futuro. Como todo el mundo sabe, contamos con la mayor inversión en dólares de la historia realizada por cualquier país en Estados Unidos; sin embargo, estas nuevas inversiones elevarán aún más esa cifra».

Usando el tono grandilocuente que lo caracteriza y sin explicar cómo ni cuándo, Trump aseguró que «veremos llegar a Estados Unidos fábricas, plantas y equipos en niveles históricos, lo que generará millones de empleos estadounidenses adicionales y bien remunerados».

Advertisement

¿Por qué Trump dio marcha atrás?

Una tasa del 20% sobre toda la carga que transite el estrecho sería un importante impuesto nuevo sobre los flujos energéticos globales y aumentaría el costo del petróleo y el gas mundiales. Aproximadamente una quinta parte del suministro mundial de petróleo fluía a través del estrecho antes de que comenzara la guerra en febrero.

Hasta el lunes, los funcionarios estadounidenses habían sido firmes en que el paso por el estrecho no debería requerir pagar peajes a nadie y que los esfuerzos de Irán por cobrar por el transporte marítimo eran inaceptables.

Advertisement

La declaración de Trump de que EE.UU. impondrá tasas abrió además la puerta a Irán a que imponga sus propias tarifas. El ministro de Asuntos Exteriores iraní, Abbas Araghchi, quien escribió con ironía en X que «el presidente tiene toda la razón. Quien proporcione el paso seguro y seguro de buques comerciales a través del Estrecho de Ormuz debe ser compensado por este servicio,» justificando así el reclamo iraní de cobrar peaje.

El canciller pareció burlarse de Trump al decir que «Irán siempre ha sido el GUARDIÁN del Estrecho y lo seguirá siendo SIEMPRE. El 20% es, por supuesto, demasiado. Seremos justos.»

En el terreno, la guerra está prácticamente reanudada desde que el propio Trump anunció en la cumbre de la OTAN de la semana pasada que «el alto el fuego» con el país persa «se terminó».

Advertisement
Posteo de Trump sobre peaje en Ormuz. Foto: TruthSocial

El jefe de la Casa Blanca sostiene en su posteo que «Estados Unidos está ganando de nuevo, ganando como nunca antes. Se han acabado los días en que Irán mataba a cientos de miles de personas, incluidos 52.000 manifestantes; y, lo que es más importante: ¡Irán nunca tendrá un arma nuclear! Gracias por su atención a este asunto».

Sin embargo, la situación es extremadamente delicada, con un régimen iraní astuto que se aprovecha de la situación y con Trump que no encuentra una salida rápida para este conflicto y que le repercute internamente.

Encrucijada

En teoría, Irán y Estados Unidos se encuentran a casi la mitad del plazo de 60 días en el que debían negociar el fin definitivo de la guerra y un acuerdo sobre el controvertido programa nuclear iraní. Pero los renovados ataques en el estrecho han avivado los temores de un retorno a una guerra total y de mayores perturbaciones a la economía mundial. Los anuncios de Trump y sus desmentidas no ayudan a la incertidumbre global.

Advertisement

A nivel interno, el conflicto sigue siendo una pesadilla para Trump. Cuando lanzó la ofensiva en febrero, el jefe de la Casa Blanca pensó que sería rápida y efectiva y que el régimen iraní caería enseguida. Nada de eso sucedió. Y, aunque varias veces ya anunció un alto el fuego, todavía sigue lidiando con la apertura del estrecho de Ormuz, cuyo tránsito era absolutamente fluido antes de la guerra.

Ahora Irán tiene en sus manos una probada arma de presión global y la utiliza. Mientras tanto, Trump pierde popularidad entre los estadounidenses no solo por la guerra sino por el impacto del aumento de los precios en Estados Unidos que generó la suba del petróleo, sumado a la política arancelaria.

El problema para el presidente es que cada vez se acercan más las elecciones legislativas de noviembre, donde los republicanos tienen el riesgo de perder la Cámara de Representantes e incluso el Senado, según las encuestas.

Advertisement

El problema de fondo para él es el alza del combustible, que repercute en la inflación y en los bolsillos de los estadounidenses. Este martes, Trump recibió la buena noticia de que el índice de precios de junio había bajado por primera vez desde el inicio del conflicto a 3,5%, gracias a la baja del combustible porque el mes pasado el estrecho había estado abierto.

Pero ahora el tráfico de alto en Ormuz se ha reducido casi hasta detenerse. Solo 10 embarcaciones pasaron por la vía fluvial el lunes, el nivel más bajo en un mes, una fracción de las más de 130 embarcaciones diarias que transitaban por el estrecho antes de la guerra, según Kpler, una empresa de datos marítimos. El anuncio de la imposición del peaje impactó rápidamente en los mercados y agregó más incertidumbre al panorama. Por eso decidió anularlo.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump AG pick Todd Blanche faces Senate test in first major confirmation fight since Graham’s death

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Attorney General nominee Todd Blanche will face senators Wednesday in a high-stakes confirmation hearing that will test Republican unity on the Senate Judiciary Committee in the first major nomination fight since the sudden death of Sen. Lindsey Graham.

Advertisement

«My colleagues and I are working to fill Senator Graham’s seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee before the Committee votes on Todd Blanche’s nomination next week,» Tennessee Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn told Fox News Digital.

«I look forward to confirming Mr. Blanche as Attorney General so he can continue his great work to crack down on crime, eradicate the two tiers of justice, and wipe out fraud. That’s exactly what Lindsey would’ve wanted us to do to honor his legacy,» she added.

LINDSEY GRAHAM, SOUTH CAROLINA SENATOR WHO ROSE FROM SMALL-TOWN ROOTS TO GOP POWER BROKER, DIES AT 71

Advertisement

Todd Blanche, nominee for U.S. deputy attorney general, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C., on February 12. (Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Republicans are navigating their first major nomination battle without Graham—a former Judiciary Committee chairman whose courtroom-style questioning and command of confirmation fights made him one of the GOP’s most influential voices.

Blanche has been a staunch ally of President Donald Trump, first serving as his personal defense attorney before helping lead his criminal defense against cases Trump and his allies denounced as politically motivated.

Advertisement

He was appointed by Trump as Deputy Attorney General when the president returned to office before being tapped to fill former Attorney General Pam Bondi’s shoes.

TRUMP’S AG NOMINEE RACKS UP MASSIVE SUPPORT AHEAD OF CONFIRMATION HEARING: ‘REAL RESULTS’

Lindsey Graham at 2023 Trump rally

Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, speaks during a campaign event for former US President Donald Trump in Pickens, South Carolina, US, on Saturday, July 1, 2023.  (Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«When the Corrupt Biden ‘Injustice’ Department and Radical Left Prosecutors tried to throw me in jail, and interfered in our Historic 2024 Presidential Campaign, Todd stood by my side and fought off the Lawfare,» Trump posted in part on Truth Social Tuesday.

Advertisement

Twenty conservative leaders penned a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, urging him to confirm Blanche, arguing that he has already proven he will «fight back.»

The letter, exclusively shared with Fox News Digital and spearheaded by the Article III Project, was signed by conservative legal figures including Article III Project founder Mike Davis, America First Legal Executive Director Gene Hamilton, John Eastman of the Claremont Institute, and others. The signers cited Blanche’s clerkships, his time as a federal prosecutor and his work in private practice.

«Blanche made a tremendous sacrifice, walking away from a massive salary as a partner at a premier law firm to defend President Trump when almost no one else would,» read the letter.

Advertisement

«He stood in the arena. Most importantly, he won. Blanche fought back against the most nakedly partisan prosecution in modern American history: Alvin Bragg’s absurd attempt to transform a lawful nondisclosure agreement into 34 felony counts,» it continued.

DEMOCRAT POLITICOS RERUN UNDERHANDED LEFTIST PLAYBOOK IN EFFORT TO TORPEDO TRUMP’S AG NOMINEE

Democrats have already signaled strong opposition to making Blanche’s acting appointment permanent, citing his close ties to Trump.

Advertisement

«He’s got a record. It’s not what he says. It’s what he’s done and what he’s consistently done is put Donald Trump above everything else. So his actions, this is a person who’s got a very clear record,» Vermont Sen. Peter Welch said Tuesday. «His actions speak much louder than whatever he says in the hearing.»

Todd Blanche standing next to President Trump, who is at a podium

US President Donald Trump speaks alongside Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (L) during a news conference in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House on June 27, 2025. (ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

«40+ civil rights organizations just came out against Todd Blanche. Todd Blanche is indicting civil rights champions, protecting insurrectionists, and firing prosecutors. All to protect Donald Trump—not YOU,» Senate Judiciary Democrats wrote on X.

«Acting AG Todd Blanche has spent this confirmation fight doing what he’s always done for his client Donald Trump: Denying the obvious, defending the indefensible, and lying under oath. He’s already made it clear that we can’t trust a word that comes out of his mouth,» said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Monday.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

As for the conservative leaders who are urging Grassley to swiftly confirm Blanche, they say the «case for confirmation is simple.»

«Blanche already knows the job. He already knows the department. He is already executing the Trump agenda. Forcing a new nominee through the confirmation process would squander months of irreplaceable momentum–months the deep state would use to run out the clock. There is no reason to delay and every reason to act. The undersigned urge you to confirm Todd Blanche now,» they wrote.

Advertisement

The hearing begins Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. ET.

Fox News’ Caroline Miller contributed to this report.

Advertisement

attorney general, justice department, lindsey graham

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias