Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

18 House Republicans defy Trump to pass Ukraine aid package headed for veto fight

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Republican-led House on Thursday passed a sweeping security package providing new military aid to Ukraine and imposing sanctions on Russia, delivering a sharp rebuke to the Trump administration, who opposed the measure. 

Advertisement

Eighteen Republicans crossed party lines to support the Democrat-authored legislation in a vote of 226-195. California Rep. Kevin Kiley, an independent who caucuses with Republicans, also supported the legislation. Meanwhile, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was the lone Democratic lawmaker to vote against the bill.

House GOP leadership and the vast majority of Republicans opposed the legislation aimed at bolstering Ukraine’s defenses amid a surge in Russian missile and drone strikes as the conflict enters its fifth year.

The measure now heads to the Senate, where it faces an uphill battle to clear the chamber. The White House said the legislation would undermine President Donald Trump’s goal of ending the prolonged conflict and that he would veto the measure, according to a statement obtained by Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

The GOP-led House passed a Ukraine aid package over the objections of House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and the White House. (Al Drago/Bloomberg)

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: GOP REBELS DEFY TRUMP AS CONGRESSIONAL GRIP CONTINUES TO WEAKEN ACROSS MULTIPLE VOTES

«The bill seeks to tie the President’s hands by mandating a wide-ranging U.S. response to the Russia-Ukraine war while adding hundreds of millions in unfunded authorizations,» the White House document reads, in part. 

Advertisement

The security package would reaffirm U.S. support for Ukraine and NATO, authorize more than $1.5 billion in new security assistance and $8 billion in direct loans, and extend a Pentagon program that procures weapons and military equipment for Ukraine. 

The legislation would also target the Kremlin’s energy profits, which are central to keeping Russia’s war effort going, as well as organizations and companies that do business with sanctioned Russian entities.

The White House warned that the legislation’s mandatory sanctions would «plunge the global economy into chaos.»

Advertisement

But Republicans who supported the measure said its passage should not be viewed as defying the president. 

«President Trump has been the leader to support the people of Ukraine, and so I’ll be voting for the people of Ukraine, continuing the Trump tradition of support,» Wilson, a South Carolina lawmaker, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

When asked about GOP opposition, Wilson said, «Putin needs to know that the American people stand with the brave and courageous people of Ukraine.»

Advertisement
The White House warned that President Donald Trump would veto the Ukraine Support Act if it reaches his desk.

The White House warned that President Donald Trump would veto the Ukraine Support Act if it reaches his desk. (Photographer: Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

PRO-UKRAINE GOP REP. BACON DECLARES ‘REAL REPUBLICANS KNOW THAT PUTIN’S RUSSIA HATES THE WEST AND FREEDOM’

Still, several Republicans who opposed the measure said their opposition should not be viewed as a lack of support for Ukraine. 

«This bill is not about helping Ukraine. This is not about standing up to Vladimir Putin,» Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., said. «This is about engaging in Trump Derangement Syndrome as President Trump tries to bring this [conflict] in for a landing.»

Advertisement

Others in the GOP conference voiced firm opposition to additional U.S. aid for the country.

«I oppose further funding of Ukraine,» Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., told Fox News Digital.

The successful vote came after the legislation, sponsored by Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., had languished in the House Foreign Affairs Committee for more than a year after being introduced in early 2025. 

Advertisement

But the measure gained momentum after a handful of defecting Republicans signed a Democrat-authored discharge petition that triggered a vote over the objections of House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who controls the floor.

Most Republicans are reluctant to support legislation that comes to the floor via a discharge petition, which is often seen as undermining GOP leadership and aiding Democrats in the minority.

«Democrats have repeatedly governed in the minority as if we were in the majority, and we’re going to do so again this week,» House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Tuesday.

Advertisement
A damaged residential apartment building in Kramatorsk, Ukraine

A residential apartment building in Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, remains damaged after a Russian attack Wednesday that killed at least three people and wounded four others. (Artem Stepanov/Suspilne Ukraine/JSC «UA:PBC»/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

Some GOP lawmakers also argued the Ukraine measure was poorly drafted and outdated. 

For example, the bill calls on NATO countries to increase defense spending to 2% of their economic output, but Trump secured a 5% commitment from allies in 2025.

«This bill literally moves us backwards, and a decrease of NATO defense member spending would be the result,» Rep. Ryan Mackenzie, R-Pa., said.

Advertisement

The legislation also proposes a lower figure for training and equipping Ukraine’s military than what Congress authorized last year in annual defense policy legislation.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«It’s increasingly obvious that this [war] will end, and when it ends, it will be through negotiation,» Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, said during debate on the House floor. «If you support this bill, then clearly you are not interested in peace, because the consequences would tie the hands of this president and could lead to future hostilities that would bleed over into Europe.»

Advertisement

But the legislation’s proponents fired back that Ukraine is in desperate need of military aid amid stalled efforts to end the war.

«This is our Churchill moment or our Chamberlain moment,» Bacon, who is not running for reelection, said. «By God, I want to choose Churchill, and this House better choose Churchill.»

politics, ukraine, bills, republicans, sanctions, house of representatives politics, donald trump

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Keir Starmer se despide en la previa del duelo ante Argentina: «Este es el final de mi trayectoria política»

Published

on


Con Downing Street embanderada para el partido entre Argentina e Inglaterra, el primer ministro laborista, Sir Keir Starmer, pasó su último día en el cargo tras su renuncia, apremiado por el alcalde de Mánchester, Andy Burnham, que aspiraba a ocupar su puesto, ante el crecimiento de la ultraderecha en el país.

Una interna laborista cruel para un líder poco carismático para los británicos: abogado de derechos humanos y exprocurador de la Corona, más popular fuera del Reino Unido que en su propio país. La condecoración con la Legión de Honor por parte de Emmanuel Macron y su implacable defensa de Ucrania y su ayuda en la guerra así lo demuestran.

Advertisement

Keir Starmer se enfrentó el miércoles a las preguntas de la líder conservadora Kemi Badenoch en su última sesión de interpelación al primer ministro (PMQs), a partir del mediodía. Hubo palabras simpáticas de los diputados, que compararon su renuncia con una tarjeta roja de más de 400 árbitros de la Cámara de los Comunes, y mucha emoción.

«No me importa el resultado de esta noche, siempre que ganemos«, bromeó Starmer, quien dimitió el 22 de junio tras meses de presión dentro de su propio Partido Laborista.

«El final de mi trayectoria política»

Advertisement

«Este es el final de mi trayectoria política«, declaró Starmer, quien se dedicó a ella a los 50 años, como última de sus respuestas en el interrogatorio parlamentario.

Respondía a una emotiva pregunta de Carolyn Harris, una de sus más firmes defensoras y amigas. Starmer agradeció a Harris su apoyo y amistad hacia él y su familia.

«Señor presidente, esta será mi última intervención desde esta tribuna. Todo primer ministro sabe, al asumir el cargo, que llegará el día en que deberá ceder el mando. Ese día ha llegado para mí. Este es el final de mi trayectoria política. En seis años, pasé de una derrota histórica en 2019 a una victoria histórica en 2024, y en dos años de gobierno dejo el país en mejor situación de la que lo encontré. Estoy orgulloso de todo lo que hemos logrado», dijo.

Advertisement

A continuación, agradeció a su equipo político, a los diputados y a los funcionarios públicos.

Starmer añadió: «A mi sucesor y a cada uno de ustedes, les brindo mi apoyo incondicional a todos mis colegas en la Cámara».

«A todos aquellos en la tribuna cuyas vidas han cambiado o mejorado gracias a este gobierno laborista, y a todos los que en todo el país luchan por ser vistos y escuchados: ustedes son la razón por la que entré en política. A mi esposa e hijos: los amo. Adiós», fueron sus últimas palabras, en medio de una ovación, con los diputados de pie despidiéndolo.

Advertisement
Stamer en la última intervención ante el Parlamento. Foto: EFE

El último «Question Time»

La actual líder conservadora, Kemi Badenoch, se ha ganado la reputación de ser una adversaria implacable de Starmer en las sesiones del Question Time al primer ministro. Cuando ella lo presionó sobre el nombramiento de Peter Mandelson como embajador en Estados Unidos, la admisión de Starmer de que la persistente amistad de Mandelson con Jeffrey Epstein había surgido durante el proceso de evaluación provocó exclamaciones de sorpresa en la Cámara de los Comunes y un ambiente sombrío entre los diputados laboristas.

Otro intercambio memorable ocurrió el verano pasado, cuando Starmer cortó en seco a Badenoch con una respuesta de una sola palabra, al ser preguntado si planeaba mantener la promesa del programa laborista sobre impuestos. «Sí», dijo, poniéndose de pie y volviéndose a sentar rápidamente, lo que provocó risas en los escaños.

Como contexto: antes de las elecciones generales del año pasado, el Partido Laborista prometió no aumentar los impuestos a los «trabajadores», incluidas las cotizaciones a la Seguridad Social (National Insurance), el impuesto sobre la renta y el IVA.

Advertisement

Pero en este último intercambio se vio que existía una relación personal, privada y cálida entre el primer ministro y la líder de la oposición. Fue Badenoch quien deseó a él, a su esposa y a sus hijos un gran futuro. Starmer reconoció que ella lo había llamado privadamente cuando un terrorista quemó su casa, en un hecho que aterrorizó a su familia, o cuando su hermano murió de cáncer.

El reloj para el hijo de un relojero

Este intercambio sucedió tras su última reunión de gabinete, celebrada anteriormente, en la que algunos ministros derramaron lágrimas y el primer ministro recibió un reloj de sobremesa grabado con su nombre.

Advertisement

El viceprimer ministro, David Lammy, organizó una colecta para adquirir el reloj, creado por el mismo diseñador que se encargó de la renovación de la Torre Elizabeth, donde se encuentra el Big Ben. Los relojes tienen un significado personal para Starmer, ya que su padre era coleccionista de estos objetos.

Primer primer ministro laborista en 10 años

Starmer dejará el liderazgo del Partido Laborista el viernes y traspasará el poder a Andy Burnham, diputado por Makerfield, antes de abandonar Downing Street el lunes.

Advertisement

La noticia llega mientras Burnham afirma que es necesaria una revisión exhaustiva de la seguridad de los diputados, tras el asesinato de la exministra y diputada Ann Widdecombe. Las primeras palabras de Starmer fueron sus condolencias a la familia y a los amigos de Ann, a los conservadores y a Reform, los dos partidos en los que militó Widdecombe.

En medio de las secuelas del Brexit y el escándalo de Boris Johnson, el 4 de julio de 2024, Keir Starmer se convirtió en el primer primer ministro laborista en casi década y media, llevando a su partido a una histórica victoria en las elecciones generales. Llegó a Downing Street con la mayor mayoría parlamentaria de cualquier primer ministro desde Tony Blair en 1997. Sin embargo, apenas dos años después —casi exactamente en el mismo aniversario—, Starmer anunció su dimisión, primero como líder laborista y luego como primer ministro.

¿Por qué el mandato de Starmer no cumplió con las expectativas? ¿Fueron las políticas, la dinámica política o las personalidades lo que llevó al Partido Laborista a romper con la tradición y cambiar de líder a mitad de legislatura?

Advertisement

Antes de 2024, el Partido Laborista se centró más en la campaña electoral que en prepararse para gobernar. Resultaba revelador que, cada vez que se le pedía a Keir Starmer que explicara los logros de su gobierno —incluso casi hasta su discurso de despedida—, ponía el énfasis en la transformación del Partido Laborista y en la victoria electoral. Esos éxitos eran necesarios, pero distaban mucho de ser suficientes para desempeñar con éxito el cargo de primer ministro. El hecho de que Starmer centrara su atención en ellos influyó en el desarrollo posterior de su mandato.

Starmer basó su campaña en la competencia. De hecho, tanto él como su gabinete parecían creer que el mero hecho de que un gobierno laborista sustituyera a uno conservador bastaría para sacar a la economía británica del estancamiento de la última década. Pensaban que, simplemente actuando con competencia e integridad —cualidades cuya ausencia había reprochado a sus predecesores—, lograrían revertir la pérdida de confianza en la política.

Tras las elecciones, la falta de un plan de gobierno claro era evidente, al igual que la aparente distancia que Starmer marcaba entre su figura y las políticas que impulsaban sus ministros. Los planes carecían de coherencia, y lo que parecían ser «grandes ideas» —como un gobierno impulsado por misiones— se esfumaron en cuanto Starmer cruzó el umbral de Downing Street.

Advertisement

Al principio, Starmer parecía un primer ministro atípico, con un interés y un deseo genuinos de reformar el Estado. La campaña electoral de 2024 y los primeros meses de su gobierno estuvieron marcados por el discurso sobre «misiones» transversales y por cómo su ejecución requeriría «nada menos que una reconfiguración completa del Estado británico». Sin embargo, a las grandes palabras siguieron escasas acciones.

Starmer tiene el mérito de haber mejorado las relaciones entre ministros y funcionarios, aunque dicho acercamiento no perduró. La salida de Chris Wormald y el fulminante cese de Olly Robbins, que negoció el Brexit por el caso Mandelson, volvieron a deteriorar las relaciones entre los ministros y los funcionarios.

Su no a la guerra con Irán y a Trump

Advertisement

Si hay un legado de sir Keir Starmer, es su no rotundo a Donald Trump, a participar en la guerra con Irán y su indefectible apoyo a Ucrania y a su presidente, Volodímir Zelenski. También su acercamiento a Europa, tras padecer el fracaso del Brexit.

No logró reforzar presupuestariamente a las fuerzas armadas, un objetivo que cobra más relevancia si aumenta el conflicto con Rusia. John Healey, secretario de Defensa, dimitió por lo que calificó de «falta de voluntad» del Tesoro y «incapacidad» de Starmer para destinar los recursos necesarios al gasto en defensa. Menos de dos semanas después, Starmer anunció su dimisión.

La preferencia de Starmer por el procedimiento sobre la política dificultó su trabajo. El gobierno de Starmer en su conjunto nunca logró articular por qué quería estar en el poder, y la percepción era la de un primer ministro que deliberadamente rehuía la «visión» (una palabra que, según se dice, Starmer detesta), en favor de centrarse en el procedimiento. La gestión económica de Starmer y Reeves los puso en desventaja desde el principio. Esto se debió en parte a factores ajenos a su voluntad: heredaron posiblemente la situación fiscal más difícil de cualquier gobierno en las últimas décadas, con un elevado déficit y planes de gasto poco realistas. Pero algunos de sus problemas fueron responsabilidad suya.

Advertisement

Como despedida a Starmer, los diputados han aprobado la «Ley Hillsborough», con el objetivo de evitar encubrimientos relacionados con fallos del Estado tras la masacre en el estadio.

El gobierno también ha anunciado que los adolescentes mayores en el Reino Unido estarán sujetos a un toque de queda nocturno en las redes sociales, aunque podrán optar por no participar en él modificando la configuración de sus cuentas.

La Legión de Honor

Advertisement

Emmanuel Macron otorgó la Legión de Honor, la máxima distinción francesa, al primer ministro británico Keir Starmer, quien ha dimitido y será reemplazado el 20 de julio en Downing Street por Andy Burnham.

El presidente francés le entregó la condecoración el lunes, mientras Keir Starmer se encontraba en París para una cumbre de la Coalición de los Voluntarios, que reúne a los países que apoyan a Ucrania, y para asistir al tradicional desfile militar del Día de la Bastilla el martes por la mañana, según anunció el Palacio del Elíseo. Emmanuel Macron y Keir Starmer son los fundadores de esta Coalición de los Voluntarios, que brinda apoyo diplomático y militar a Ucrania.

Llega Andy Burnham como premier

Advertisement

El exalcalde del Gran Mánchester, Andy Burnham, tiene asegurada su sucesión al primer ministro saliente, Keir Starmer, tras haber obtenido el respaldo necesario de los diputados laboristas, según el recuento del partido. Burnham aún necesita el apoyo de tres organizaciones afiliadas, incluyendo al menos dos sindicatos, un paso considerado meramente formal.

Burnham recibió el respaldo de 27 diputados laboristas adicionales el lunes, elevando el total a 322, recibidos el jueves pasado, primer día de votación. Con el apoyo de 349 de los 403 diputados laboristas, ningún otro candidato puede alcanzar los 81 respaldos necesarios para postularse al liderazgo. El plazo para votar finaliza hoy.

Será investido oficialmente como líder del Partido Laborista el 17 de julio, en una conferencia extraordinaria, antes de trasladarse a Downing Street, tras reunirse con el rey Carlos III.

Advertisement

El exalcalde del Gran Mánchester, Andy Burnham, ganó una elección parcial el 19 de junio, lo que le permitió ocupar su escaño en el Parlamento, requisito indispensable para presentar su candidatura al liderazgo laborista. Ya había intentado liderar el Partido Laborista en dos ocasiones, en 2010 y 2015. Desde su regreso al Parlamento, Andy Burnham ha comenzado a esbozar sus prioridades para el gobierno, prometiendo, en particular, una ambiciosa iniciativa de descentralización destinada a impulsar el crecimiento.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Insurance companies put on notice for stranding trans patients who want to reverse surgeries

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Diana Harshbarger, R-Tenn., a lawmaker with a background in pharmacy, is introducing a bill that would require health insurance companies that provide transgender procedures to also pay for detransitions and adverse effects.

Advertisement

Harshbarger fears that under many current plans, transitioners who consider reversing their sex-reassignment procedures are stuck with what is effectively a financial one-way door.

«It’s outrageous that a health plan can cover sex-rejecting procedures but refuse to cover the restorative care patients need to address the harm they cause. That’s not a fair deal for patients who want to restore healthy bodily function,» Harshbarger said.

MED SCHOOL DEANS COME UP EMPTY IN TENSE HEARING WHEN ASKED POINT BLANK IF MEN CAN HAVE BABIES: ‘RIDICULOUS’

Advertisement

UNITED STATES – MAY 19: Rep. Diana Harshbarger, R-Tenn., speaks during the Republican Study Committee news conference to introduce a «Women’s Bill of Rights» outside the Capitol on Thursday, May 19, 2022. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Although unlikely to become law over Democratic opposition in the Senate, the bill, titled the TRUTH in Coverage Act, draws attention to a growing number of patients who have regretted sex-reassignment procedures and lawmaker concern over barriers to addressing their fallout.

It would require insurers that cover «sex-rejecting procedures» to also cover items and services needed to address the complications or adverse effects resulting from them. The bill would enact the requirement regardless of state or local laws that mandate such procedures.

Advertisement

If passed, the bill would go into effect Jan. 1, 2027. It has 12 cosponsors, including Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., the former chairman of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health.

In its current form, Harshbarger’s bill would amend three federal statutes governing private health insurance coverage to create a uniform federal coverage requirement: the Public Health Service Act, employer-sponsored health plans and group health plans. The bill would also prevent insurers from adjusting copays, deductibles or implementing treatment limitations.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed a similar bill into law last year, addressing a similar concern at the local level.

Advertisement

WATCH: DR. OZ SAYS NEWSOM, OTHER BLUE STATES HAVE TURNED MEDICAID FRAUD INTO A ‘FEATURE’

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott arrives at press conference

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott arrives during a press conference for Eli Lilly and Company in Houston, Texas, on Sept. 23, 2025. (Antranik Tavitian/Reuters)

Senate Bill 1257, sponsored by Texas Sen. Bryan Hughes, published a statement with the Texas Senate Research Senate, arguing the need for his bill.

«Many of these individuals require extensive medical care to manage or reverse the effects of previous treatments, yet they are frequently denied insurance coverage, leading to insurmountable out-of-pocket expenses. Without this coverage, patients face significant health risks, including hormone imbalances, surgical complications, and psychological distress,» Hughes wrote.

Advertisement

According to the National Library of Medicine, it’s difficult to determine exactly how many detransitions there are or at what point someone would be considered a detransitioner. Researchers noted that stopping hormones, reversing surgeries or changing legal documents could all be triggers for what it means to begin the detransition process.  

By casting a wide net and including adverse effects, Harshbarger’s bill would circumvent those technicalities.

«Patients should never be abandoned after undergoing life-altering, harmful medical interventions once reality sets in,» Harshbarger said.

Advertisement

TALARICO CAMPAIGNS WITH SURGEON WHO OPERATED ON TRANSGENDER MINORS: ‘WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING’

Diana Harshbarger

Rep. Diana Harshbarger, R-Tenn., speaks during the news conference on Thursday, Jan. 23, 2025. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«As a pharmacist, I’ve seen insurance companies find every excuse in the book to avoid paying for the care patients actually need. My TRUTH in Coverage Act restores fairness, promotes transparency and ensures patients aren’t left paying the price for care their insurance should cover.»

Advertisement

It’s unclear when and if Harshbarger’s bill would reach the House floor for a vote.

health, health care, health care healthy living, congress, politics

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Iran calls on Houthis to prepare to cut off Red Sea gateway — can the terror group do it?

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran has reportedly instructed Yemen’s Houthi terrorists to prepare to close a critical Red Sea gateway if the United States attacks Iranian power infrastructure, Reuters reported, a threat experts warn could sharply disrupt global shipping even if the group cannot completely seal the waterway.

Advertisement

«This threat should be taken seriously,» Nadwa Al-Dawsari of the Middle East Institute told Fox News Digital. «With recent escalation and U.S. strikes on Iran, Tehran has already signaled that the Bab al-Mandab could become part of its response.»

Three sources told Reuters on Thursday that Iran’s leadership had discussed using the Houthis to shut the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and recently conveyed the request to the group. A source close to the Houthis said missiles and drones had been deployed near the waterway and that the group was awaiting an order to begin attacking shipping.

IRAN-BACKED TERROR PROXY HOUTHIS THREATEN FRESH ATTACKS AFTER YEMEN AIRPORT STRIKE

Advertisement

A Houthi follower during a pro-Iran demonstration, in Sanaa, Yemen, April 6, 2026. (Khaled Abdullah/Reuters)

Edmund Fitton-Brown, a former British ambassador to Yemen and senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, warned in a recent Fox News Digital report that a full resumption of the Houthi maritime campaign could trigger wider fighting.

«It will be interesting if the Houthis do go all in, and resume their campaign against Red Sea shipping with full intensity,» Fitton-Brown said. «This will draw international anger and likely result in Israeli and U.S. strikes on Sana’a and Hodeida.»

Advertisement

«There is potential for a general escalation if this happens, albeit one in which the allies have a clear military advantage,» he added. 

Al-Dawsari said the Houthis have continued developing the weapons needed to threaten the narrow shipping corridor despite largely refraining from maritime attacks over the past year.

«While the Houthis have largely refrained from attacking shipping for about a year, they have continued to advance their maritime capabilities, including missiles, drones and sea mines,» she said. «They may not be able to fully close the strait, but they could significantly disrupt shipping and raise costs and risks for commercial traffic.»

Advertisement

US CLAWS BACK KEY CONCESSION TO IRAN AFTER FRESH ATTACKS ON COMMERCIAL SHIPS IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ

Rebel fighter with a gun

This photo released by the Houthi Media Center shows Houthi forces boarding the cargo ship Galaxy Leader on Nov. 19, 2023. (Houthi Media Center via AP)

But the group would not necessarily need to physically control the waterway. Its previous missile and drone campaign demonstrated that repeated attacks — or even a credible threat of them — can push major shipping companies to reroute vessels around Africa, driving up insurance, fuel and freight costs.

The Bab el-Mandeb connects the Gulf of Aden to the Red Sea and Suez Canal, making it one of the world’s most important maritime choke points. The consequences of renewed attacks would be especially severe because Iran has already disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, historically the principal route for roughly one-fifth of global energy supplies.

Advertisement

A substantial volume of Gulf oil has consequently been redirected through Saudi Arabia to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. Reuters reported that the Bab el-Mandeb route now carries approximately 7% of global energy supplies and that Saudi Arabia has shifted about 70% of its energy exports through Yanbu.

The reported instructions also raise new questions about how much control Tehran exercises over major Houthi military decisions. 

American ships in Red Sea

In this image provided by the U.S. Navy, the amphibious dock landing ship USS Carter Hall and amphibious assault ship USS Bataan transit the Bab al-Mandeb strait on Aug. 9, 2023. (Mass Communications Spc. 2nd Class Moises Sandoval/U.S. Navy via AP)

«Any decision to escalate in the Bab al-Mandab would be strategic and tied more to the interests of Iran and the Axis of Resistance than to Houthi interests alone,» Al-Dawsari said. «Decisions of this magnitude are likely coordinated through the Axis’ joint operations room under IRGC oversight.»

Advertisement

A source close to the Houthis claimed representatives of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Yemen would control the timing of any move against the strait, Reuters reported.

The latest warning follows earlier Houthi threats against maritime traffic. In the June 12 report, Fox News Digital reported that the group had announced a complete ban on Israeli-owned ships in the Red Sea and declared them «legitimate targets.»

EXPERT WARNS OF ‘GENERAL ESCALATION’ OF FIGHTING IF HOUTHIS RESUME RED SEA CAMPAIGN

Advertisement
A satellite imagery shows Bab el Mandeb Strait

A satellite imagery shows Bab el Mandeb Strait, a key shipping waterway and the gateway to the Red Sea, in this handout picture dated July 12, 2026. (Nasa Worldview/Handout via Reuters)

A State Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital at the time that the actions of Iran and the Houthis were «unacceptable» and «dangerous,» warning that they could inflame regional tensions and further disrupt global supply chains.

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres has «repeatedly condemned» Houthis attacks against ships in the Red Sea and called on all parties Thursday to avoid further escalation, his spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, told Fox News Digital.

«Any disruptions or attacks would endanger the safety and security of seafarers, freedom of navigation and the stability of global supply chains and have a negative impact on the economic and humanitarian situation in Yemen and beyond,» Dujarric said. «The Secretary-General underscores that U.N. Security Council Resolution 2722 (2024) must be fully respected in its entirety,» he said on the resolution condemning at least two dozen Houthis attacks on commercial vessels since November 2023 and demanding an immediate end to the attacks. 

Advertisement

The emerging threat has also renewed scrutiny of the Iranian weapons networks that helped build the Houthis’ missile and drone arsenal.

Amr Al-Bidh, foreign affairs chief of the Southern Arabian Transitional Council, said that the reported threat also exposed broader failures in the handling of Yemen’s security crisis. «The fact that individuals convicted of trafficking Iranian weapons to the Houthis and leading terrorist operations are now being released under a U.N.-brokered deal only underscores how poorly the Yemen crisis is being managed,» he said, «the main beneficiary of this vacuum is Iran, as seen in its credible threat to close the Bab al-Mandab Strait.»

In a July 15 letter obtained by Fox News Digital, the Southern Arabian Transitional Council formerly known as the Southern Transitional Council, a southern Yemeni separatist movement that seeks greater autonomy or independence for the territory of the former South Yemen, warned U.N. Special Envoy for Yemen Hans Grundberg that a U.N.-facilitated detainee agreement may include people the council says were convicted of assisting Iranian weapons transfers to the Houthis.

Advertisement
Missile launched

A missile is launched from a warship during the U.S.-led coalition operation against military targets in Yemen, aimed at the Iran-backed Houthi militia that has been targeting international shipping in the Red Sea, in this handout picture released on Jan. 12, 2024. (US Central Command via X/Handout via REUTERS/ File Photo)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

An annex identifies individuals the council alleges were members of a cell that smuggled drones, aviation fuel and heavy and medium weapons from Iran to Sanaa.

The Office of the U.N. Special Envoy for Yemen said it received the letter only after the agreement had already been signed and stressed that it does not determine which detainees are released.

Advertisement

«We have received the letter after the agreement was signed,» spokesperson Ismini Palla told Fox News Digital. «The United Nations – as well as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) – do not decide who is released and who remains in detention. Our role is limited to mediating the negotiations and ICRC leads on the implementation of the release operation.»

Palla added that «the names of those released are proposed and agreed between the parties under the framework of the Stockholm Agreement on prisoners’ exchange of 2018.»

Fox News Digital reached out to the State Department and the Iranian Mission to the United Nations on the latest developments.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Paul Tilsley and Reuters contributed to this report.



war with iran, terrorism, national security, conflicts

Continue Reading

Tendencias