Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Democrats win Virginia redistricting fight, threatening Republican House majority

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democrats scored a major victory Tuesday when Virginia voters narrowly passed a congressional redistricting referendum that could give the party a significant boost in the battle for the U.S. House of Representatives majority in this year’s midterm elections, The Associated Press reported at 8:49 p.m. ET.

Advertisement

The ballot measure gives the Democrat-controlled Virginia legislature — rather than the state’s current nonpartisan commission — temporary redistricting power through the 2030 election. It could result in a 10-1 advantage for Democrats in Virginia’s congressional delegation, up from their current 6-5 edge.

The referendum, which follows President Donald Trump’s push for rare but not unheard-of mid-decade redistricting in Republican-led states, would give the Democrats four additional left-leaning U.S. House seats ahead of the midterms as the party tries to win back control of the chamber from the GOP, which currently holds a razor-thin majority.

Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who in many ways became the face of her party’s push to pass the ballot initiative, said in a statement that «Virginia voters have spoken, and tonight they approved a temporary measure to push back against a President who claims he is ‘entitled’ to more Republican seats in Congress.» 

Advertisement

«Virginians watched other states go along with those demands without voter input — and we refused to let that stand. We responded the right way: at the ballot box,» the governor said.

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger speaks during a Virginians For Fair Elections canvassing event in Woodbridge, Va., on April 18, 2026. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

And Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin emphasized that «Virginians refused to let Trump play games with Americans’ right to fair representation.»

But Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said that «Virginia Democrats can’t redraw reality. This close margin reinforces that Virginia is a purple state that shouldn’t be represented by a severe partisan gerrymander. That’s exactly why the courts, who have already ruled twice to block this egregious power grab, should uphold Virginia law.»

And Hudson predicted, «Even under this map, Republicans will hold our majority based on our record cleaning up Democrats’ mess and a historic war chest to litigate the Democrats’ failures.»

Advertisement

Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Jeff Ryer said in a statement, «I know we are disappointed by tonight’s result. Evidently, a sufficient number of Virginians trusted the blatantly dishonest language the Democrats placed on the ballot to make our Commonwealth the most severely gerrymandered state in the nation.»

The standalone spring referendum capped months of political crossfire and court battles, sky-high early voting turnout and tons of national attention and money poured into the ballot box showdown.

Even though a majority of voters gave the ballot initiative a thumbs-up, it still faces legal challenges.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court of Virginia allowed the referendum to move forward after a lower court struck it down. But legal challenges to the referendum, filed in part by the Republican National Committee, the NRCC and the state GOP, remain unresolved and are still before Virginia’s highest court.

Republicans had railed against the Democrat-backed referendum.

«It’s the most partisan map in America,» former Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin told supporters at his final campaign stop in northern Virginia on the eve of the election.

Advertisement

Pointing to the Democrats pushing new maps, Youngkin charged, «What they are doing is immoral.»

Teaming up with Youngkin to crisscross the state in leading the GOP opposition to the ballot initiative was former Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares, who told the crowd the Democrats’ map is one that «you draw when you’re drunk with power.»

BATTLE FOR THE HOUSE RUNS THROUGH VIRGINIA AS COURT OKS HIGH-STAKES REDISTRICTING VOTE

Advertisement
Youngkin and Miyares lead the GOP opposition to the Democrat-fueled redistricting ballot measure

Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, right, and former state Attorney General Jason Miyares lead a chant of «no» as they lead Republican efforts to defeat a Democrat-backed congressional redistricting referendum April 20, 2026, in Leesburg, Va. (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

Speaking with Fox News Digital ahead of their final election eve rally, Miyares charged that «Democrats want to take away the voices of millions of Virginians and gerrymander the state.»

Youngkin, pointing to the duo’s relentless campaigning in recent weeks, said, «What we’re hearing over and over and over again is Virginians want fair maps. And what the yes vote represents are unfair maps.»

And the two Republicans reiterated their charge that the referendum was an «unconstitutional power grab» by Spanberger and the Democrats who control the state legislature.

Advertisement

As Youngkin and Miyares spoke in Leesburg, Trump took to the airwaves on a popular Virginia-based conservative talk show and later teamed up with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to urge voters to defeat the referendum.

Pointing to congressional Democrats, Trump warned that «if they get these additional seats, they’re going to be making changes at the federal level.»

SPANBERGER FACES ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ BACKLASH AHEAD OF CRUCIAL ELECTION

Advertisement
U.S. President Donald Trump speaking to media on the South Lawn of the White House

President Donald Trump headlined a tele town hall on the eve of Virginia’s congressional redistricting referendum urging voters to cast a ballot against the initiative. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Democrats countered that the redrawing of the maps was a necessary step to balance partisan gerrymandering already implemented by Republicans in other states at Trump’s urging.

«By voting yes, you have the chance to do something important — not just for the commonwealth, but for our entire country,» former President Barack Obama said in a video released Friday on the eve of the final day of early voting. «By voting yes, you can push back against the Republicans trying to give themselves an unfair advantage in the midterms.

«By voting yes, you can take a temporary step to level the playing field. And we’re counting on you.»

Advertisement

The video by Obama was the former president’s latest effort for the referendum. He had previously appeared in ads released by Virginians for Fair Elections, the Democrat-aligned group working to pass the ballot initiative.

OBAMA GOES ALL IN ON HIGH-STAKES REFERENDUM THAT MAY IMPACT MIDTERM ELECTIONS

But Virginians for Fair Maps, the leading Republican-aligned group opposing redistricting, used past comments by Obama against political gerrymandering in its ads opposing the referendum.

Advertisement

«Because of things like political gerrymandering, our parties have moved further and further apart, and it’s harder and harder to find common ground,» the former president said in an old clip showcased in the spot.

Republicans pointed to comments from Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, a former Virginia governor and former chair of the Democratic National Committee, who acknowledged over the weekend in a «Fox News Sunday» interview that the new maps don’t represent Virginia’s partisan breakdown.

«Ninety percent of Virginians are not Democrats, that’s true,» Kaine said.

Advertisement

But Kaine added that «about 100% of Virginians want election results to be respected.»

SOROS-BACKED GROUP AMONG LIBERAL ORGS PUMPING EYE-POPPING CASH INTO VIRGINIA GERRYMANDERING EFFORT

And Republicans took aim at Spanberger, who won November’s gubernatorial election by over 15 points as Democrats also captured the lieutenant governor and attorney general offices.

Advertisement

«Abigail Spanberger told everybody last summer that she had no interest in redistricting, and then the first bill she signs is a bill to enable the gerrymandering of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginians don’t like this and that’s why independents and a lot of Democrats are voting no too,» Youngkin told Fox News Digital.

Minutes later, Youngkin told the crowd that Spanberger is «trying to disenfranchise millions, millions of Virginians.»

Republicans trained their redistricting firepower on Spanberger since a poll two weeks ago by The Washington Post indicated that the new governor’s approval rating was barely above water, with the highest unfavorable rating for a new Virginia governor in two decades.

Advertisement

«She’s an unpopular governor with an unpopular agenda, and she lied to the voters,» Miyares charged.

Glenn Youngkin and Jason Miyares

Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, left, and former state Attorney General Jason Miyares, speak with Fox News Digital on the eve of Virginia’s congressional redistricting referendum in Leesburg, Va., April 20, 2026 (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

And Miyares and other top Republicans accused Spanberger of pulling a «bait and switch.»

Spanberger, in an ad in support of the referendum, said she was backing the measure because «it’s directly in response to what other states decide to do and a president who says he’s quote entitled to more Republican seats before this year’s midterms. Our approach is different. It’s temporary. It preserves Virginia’s fair redistricting process into the future.»

Advertisement

Supporters of redistricting dramatically outraised and outspent groups opposed to the referendum, with Virginians for Fair Elections outraising Virginians for Fair Maps by a roughly three-to-one margin. Much of the funding raised by both sides came from so-called «dark money» from nonprofit public policy groups known as 501(c)(4) organizations that are not required to disclose their donors.

Despite the Democrats’ funding advantage, recent polling suggested support for the ballot initiative was only slightly ahead of opposition amid a surge in early voting, which ended on Saturday.

«They have outspent us three to one. They’ve raised over $70 million. And yet this is a close vote,» Youngkin said.

Advertisement

Pointing to the ads in support of the referendum, Youngkin said Virginians «aren’t believing the mistruths. They aren’t believing the lies on TV. They’re actually doing the work themselves and understanding that a no vote is for fair maps and a yes vote is for the most gerrymandered maps in America.»

And Miyares emphasized that Democrats «outspent us, but we have the truth.»

Virginia is the latest battleground in the high-stakes fight between Trump and the GOP and Democrats over congressional redistricting.

Advertisement

Aiming to prevent what happened during his first term in the White House when Democrats reclaimed the House majority in the 2018 midterms, Trump last spring first floated the idea of rare, but not unheard of, mid-decade congressional redistricting.

The mission was simple: redraw congressional district maps in red states to pad the GOP’s fragile House majority to keep control of the chamber in the midterms, when the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats.

When asked by reporters last summer about his plan to add Republican-leaning House seats across the country, the president said, «Texas will be the biggest one. And that’ll be five.»

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas called a special session of the GOP-dominated state legislature to pass the new map.

But Democratic state lawmakers, who broke quorum for two weeks as they fled Texas in a bid to delay the passage of the redistricting bill, energized Democrats across the country.

Among those leading the fight against Trump’s redistricting was Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California.

Advertisement

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaking at a press conference in Sacramento

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an election night news conference at a California Democratic Party office in Sacramento Nov. 4, 2025. (Godofredo A. Vásquez/AP Photo)

California voters in November overwhelmingly passed Proposition 50, a ballot initiative that temporarily sidetracked the left-leaning state’s nonpartisan redistricting commission and returned the power to draw the congressional maps to the Democratic-dominated legislature.

That is expected to result in five more Democratic-leaning congressional districts in California, which aimed to counter the move by Texas to redraw their maps.

Advertisement

The fight quickly spread beyond Texas and California.

Republican-controlled Missouri and Ohio and swing state North Carolina, where the GOP dominates the legislature, have drawn new maps as part of the president’s push.

In blows to Republicans, a Utah district judge late last year rejected a congressional district map drawn by the state’s GOP-dominated legislature and instead approved an alternate that will create a Democratic-leaning district ahead of the midterms.

Advertisement

Republicans in Indiana’s Senate in December defied Trump, shooting down a redistricting bill that had passed the state House. The showdown in the Indiana statehouse grabbed plenty of national attention.

Florida is next up.

Two-term Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and state lawmakers in the GOP-dominated legislature are hoping to pick up an additional three to five right-leaning seats through a redistricting push during a special legislative session that kicks off April 28.

Advertisement
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaking at a news conference in Fort Lauderdale

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks during a news conference in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., July 22, 2025. (Amy Beth Bennett/South Florida Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service)

Hovering over the redistricting wars is the Supreme Court, which is expected to rule in Louisiana v. Callais, a crucial case that may lead to the overturning of a key provision in the Voting Rights Act.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

If the ruling goes the way of the conservatives on the high court, it could lead to the redrawing of a slew of majority-minority districts across the county, which would greatly favor Republicans.

Advertisement

But it is very much up in the air when the court will rule and what it will actually decide.

midterm elections, virginia, republicans elections, democrats, house of representatives, democrats elections, donald trump

INTERNACIONAL

Admirador de Bukele y amigo de Milei: quién es Abelardo de la Espriella, el nuevo presidente de Colomboa

Published

on


Javier Milei tiene un nuevo aliado en la región. El abogado ultraderechista Abelardo de la Espriella, un outsider mediático como él, ganó este domingo el balotaje frente al izquierdista Iván Cepeda y asumirá como nuevo presidente de Colombia el 7 de agosto próximo.

No fue una sorpresa. Todas las encuestas vaticinaban el triunfo de este polémico abogado, admirador del salvadoreño Nayib Bukele que irrumpió en la política colombiana para barrer a la derecha tradicional del país después de cuatro años de una inédita gestión de izquierda de Gustavo Petro.

Advertisement

Apoyado por Donald Trump, su elección inclina aún más el poder de la derecha en el área después del triunfo de José Antonio Kast en Chile y la casi segura victoria de Keiko Fujimori en Perú. Solo Yamandú Orsi, en Uruguay, y Lula da Silva, que deberá revalidar su gobierno en las elecciones del 4 de octubre en Brasil ante el derechista radical Flavio Bolsonaro, mantienen las banderas de la izquierda democrática.

Quien es Abelardo de la Espriella

De la Espriella tiene 47 años, le dicen El Tigre y no tiene ninguna experiencia en la gestión pública.

Pero en un puñado de años, igual que Milei en la Argentina, posicionó su figura en los medios con un lenguaje entre populista y frontal y con promesas de “mano dura” copiadas del manual de su admirado presidente salvadoreño en un país azotado por la violencia.

Advertisement

El candidato presidencial Abelardo de la Espriella, del movimiento opositor Defensores de la Patria, gesticula tras votar en la segunda vuelta de las elecciones en Barranquilla, Colombia, el domingo 21 de junio de 2026. (Foto AP/Iván Valencia)

El flamante mandatario electo no solo promete imitar las políticas de seguridad de Bukele, que acabó con la inseguridad en su país con un combate drástico a las pandillas que asolaban desde hace décadas su país. En un puñado de años, el salvadoreño encarceló a decenas de miles de supuestos pandilleros sin importarle el tendal de denuncias sobre violaciones a los derechos humanos, torturas y detenciones arbitarias e ilegales.

De las Espriella no solo abrazó las mismas propuestas de seguridad con la creación de megacárceles y el fin al dialogo con los grupos guerrilleros, paramilitares y carteles del narcotráfico, a los que promete “bombardear” desde el primer día. Imitó hasta el estilo estético de Bukele. El mismo corte de pelo, la misma barba, los mismos gestos.

Advertisement

Leé también: A tres meses y medio de las elecciones en Brasil, un escándalo de corrupción amenaza al gobierno de Lula

Más allá de su admiración por Milei, De la Espriella quiere ser el nuevo Bukele colombiano.

Liberal en lo económico, pero con posiciones que lo acercan más a la derecha tradicional de su país, propensa a no descuidar la presión popular, el presidente electo es fruto de la nueva dirigencia política que anida en las redes sociales.

Advertisement

Así, hizo campaña en sus cuentas personales, en las que cantó ópera, bailó con su esposa Ana Lucía Pineda y se mostró haciendo flexiones de brazos con alguno de sus cuatro hijos montado en su espalda. Además, adoptó la camiseta de la selección de fútbol como vestimenta oficial, lo que desató protestas y demandas que llegaron a la justicia.

Su irrupción en la política es reciente. Se hizo conocido como abogado en polémicos casos judiciales que conmocionaron el país. La lista es extensa: fue asesor de las paramilitares Autodefensas Unidas en el último proceso de paz y abogado de Alex Saab, operador financiero colombiano-venezolano considerado testaferro de Nicolás Maduro y hoy preso en Estados Unidos.

Pero hay un caso judicial que delineó definitivamente su rasgo polémico. Defendió a David Murcia Guzmán, creador de DMG y acusado de una estafa piramidal que afectó a más de 200.000 ahorristas colombianos con un esquema Ponzi.

Advertisement

Así, su rostro y su nombre irrumpieron en la casa de los colombianos. Después mostró su faceta de personaje mediático frontal y descarnado, como cuando escribió un artículo de opinión en El Heraldo de Barranquilla y llamó a asesinar a Maduro.

“Los venezolanos de bien y la comunidad internacional en pleno deben entender que la muerte de Nicolás Maduro se hace necesaria para garantizar la supervivencia de la República. No se trataría de un asesinato común, sino de un acto patriótico que está amparado por la constitución venezolana y que resulta, por demás, moralmente irreprochable”, escribió entonces. Lo curioso es que entonces aún era el abogado de Saab.

Leé también: Rusia pierde otro aliado estratégico: Armenia mira a Europa y Putin lanza sanciones bajo la sombra de Ucrania

Advertisement

No le salió gratis. Debió renunciar al periódico acosado por el escándalo. Pero al poco tiempo fue por más: publicó el libro “Muerte al tirano”.

De la Espriella aprovechó el impulso que le dieron los medios. En pocos años, como Milei, se convirtió en un personaje conocido en los canales de televisión. Sus posturas radicales y las redes sociales hicieron el resto para convencer a una mayoría de colombianos de buscar una tercera vía entre la derecha tradicional y la izquierda de Petro.

Ahora, Colombia se suma a la Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Bolivia, Ecuador y (casi con seguridad) Perú, en este giro ideológico a la derecha o la extrema derecha respaldada desde Washington.

Advertisement

Colombia, Abelardo de la Espriella

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

US military conducts strike on another vessel carrying alleged narco-traffickers, killing 2

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The U.S. military on Sunday announced a lethal strike on another vessel in the Caribbean carrying alleged narco-traffickers, killing two people.

Advertisement

The U.S. Southern Command said it conducted a «lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations» at the direction of the leader of the Southern Command, Gen. Francis L. Donovan of the Marine Corps.

The military claimed, citing intelligence, that the vessel «was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations.»

ALLEGED NARCO-TERRORISTS KILLED AS US FORCES STRIKE SUSPECTED DRUG-TRAFFICKING VESSEL IN CARIBBEAN

Advertisement

A U.S. military strike on a vessel in the Caribbean on June 21, 2026. (U.S. Southern Command)

There were six male survivors in addition to the two men killed in the strike.

«Following the engagement, USSOUTHCOM immediately notified U.S. Coast Guard to activate the Search and Rescue system for the survivors,» the military said.

Advertisement

This is the latest attack that the Trump administration has said was launched in an attempt to eliminate alleged narco-terrorists, with the death toll in these strikes carried out since September sitting at more than 200.

The U.S. military said it struck a vessel in the Caribbean

The military claimed, citing intelligence, that the vessel «was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations.» (U.S. Southern Command)

The Pentagon has refused to release the identities of those killed in the strikes since last fall or provide evidence of drugs on board.

The administration has been scrutinized in recent months over the strikes by Democrats and even some Republicans, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has raised concerns about killing people without due process and the possibility of killing innocent people.

Advertisement

RAND PAUL SAYS GOP COLLEAGUES ‘DON’T GIVE A S‑‑T ABOUT THESE PEOPLE IN THE BOATS’: THEY ‘SAY THEY’RE PRO-LIFE’

President Donald Trump speaking during a Cabinet meeting with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth looking on

The Pentagon has refused to release the identities of those killed in the strikes since last fall or provide evidence of drugs on board. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

«I look at my colleagues who say they’re pro-life, and they value God’s inspiration in life, but they don’t give a s‑‑- about these people in the boats,» Paul said in January. «Are they terrible people in the boats? I don’t know. They’re probably poor people in Venezuela and Colombia.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The senator previously cited Coast Guard statistics that show a significant percentage of boats boarded on suspicion of drug trafficking are innocent.

The attacks have also been denounced by human rights groups as «extrajudicial killings.»



marines, coast guard, drugs, counter terrorism

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

El absurdo del “Nuevo” Nuevo León

Published

on


Toca demostrar que Nuevo León sigue vivo y lleno de futuro (Imagen Ilustrativa Infobae)

Hay ideas que nacen para resolver problemas. Y hay ideas que nacen para distraernos de ellos. La ocurrencia del “Nuevo Nuevo León” de Samuel García pertenece claramente a la segunda categoría. Porque antes de preguntarnos si necesitamos un “Nuevo” Nuevo León, conviene responder una pregunta sencilla: ¿qué tenía de malo el original?

¿Acaso el Nuevo León que construyó algunas de las empresas más importantes de México estaba equivocado? ¿El que levantó universidades de clase mundial? ¿El que convirtió la palabra empeñada en un activo económico? ¿El que hizo del trabajo duro una forma de identidad colectiva? La respuesta es evidente: nada.

Advertisement

Por eso la idea misma de un “Nuevo Nuevo León” resulta tan extraña. No responde a una necesidad social real. Responde a una obsesión contemporánea por la novedad. El filósofo francés Gilles Lipovetsky describió cómo la novedad dejó de ser un medio para mejorar las cosas y se convirtió en un fin en sí mismo. Lo importante ya no es que algo funcione mejor; lo importante es que parezca nuevo: vanidad y frivolidad pura.

Y pocas cosas son más peligrosas para la política que confundir novedad con progreso. Las sociedades no avanzan cambiándose de nombre. Avanzan resolviendo problemas. Ninguna familia se preocupa porque su estado tenga una identidad insuficientemente moderna. La gente se preocupa por el tráfico, el agua, la seguridad, la contaminación y las oportunidades para sus hijos.

La antropología también tiene algo que decir. Clifford Geertz sostenía que las comunidades necesitan referencias compartidas para entender quiénes son y hacia dónde van. Las identidades fuertes no se reinventan cada seis años. Se construyen durante generaciones. Y Nuevo León es precisamente una de esas identidades fuertes.

Advertisement

No es una marca. No es un logotipo. No es un eslogan. Es una cultura. Es una manera de trabajar. Es una relación particular con el esfuerzo, la responsabilidad y la construcción de patrimonio. Por eso el problema de Nuevo León nunca ha sido su identidad. El problema aparece cuando dejamos de estar a la altura de ella para vivir en Samuelandia y la extorsión como forma de gobierno.

Durante décadas, el prestigio de Nuevo León se construyó sobre valores muy concretos. La palabra valía. Las obras se terminaban. El dinero se cuidaba. La capacidad importaba. La seriedad era una virtud pública. Nadie necesitaba inventar un Nuevo Nuevo León porque el verdadero funcionaba.

De hecho, la idea del “Nuevo Nuevo León” termina pareciéndose a esas versiones pirata que cualquiera reconoce de inmediato. Se parecen al original. Intentan copiar su apariencia. Dan el gatazo. Pero no están hechas de la misma tela. No duran igual. No resisten igual. No aguantan la friega. Y ahí es donde la discusión deja de ser semántica para convertirse en una discusión política de fondo.

Advertisement

Porque defender la Transformación en Nuevo León significa defender lo mejor del Nuevo León original: la cultura del trabajo, la palabra cumplida, la capacidad para gobernar, la honestidad como base de la confianza y la convicción de que la riqueza importa, pero también la forma en que se construye y llega a las familias.

La verdadera discusión que viene para nuestro estado no es entre pasado y futuro. Tampoco entre izquierda y derecha. Mucho menos entre novedad y tradición. La discusión real es entre frivolidad y seriedad. Entre apariencia y resultados. Entre quienes creen que gobernar consiste en administrar percepciones y quienes creemos que gobernar consiste en resolver problemas y materializar una verdadera Transformación.

La Presidenta de México, la Dra. Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, ha planteado para el país una visión de Crecimiento con Justicia. Una visión donde la economía crece, pero donde ese crecimiento también se traduce en bienestar para las familias. Y esa idea dialoga mucho mejor con la tradición histórica de Nuevo León que cualquier intento artificial de reinventarlo.

Advertisement

Porque el Nuevo León que admiramos nunca estuvo peleado con el progreso, la innovación o la inversión. Lo que entendía era algo más profundo: que la prosperidad solo vale cuando se construye con trabajo, responsabilidad y comunidad. Por eso llega un momento en que hay que definirse. Sin medias tintas. Sin ambigüedades. Porque la pregunta ya no es si queremos un “Nuevo” Nuevo León hechizo y hueco.

La pregunta es si queremos recuperar lo mejor del verdadero Nuevo León y llevarlo al siguiente nivel. El de Mariano Escobedo. El de la cultura de la tenacidad. El de Eugenio Garza Sada y el Capitalismo Social. El de las familias que construyeron patrimonio trabajando. El de las universidades que formaron talento de clase mundial. El de las empresas que generaron comunidad además de utilidades. Ese es el proyecto que representa la 4T Norteña.

Y por eso defender la Transformación en Nuevo León es mucho más que una definición partidista. Es una definición sobre qué tipo de estado queremos ser. Porque si se trata de Nuevo León, con el original nos quedamos. Y ahora nos toca demostrar que sigue vivo y lleno de futuro: esa es la tarea.

Advertisement

*El autor es Alcalde, con licencia, del Municipio de General Escobedo, Nuevo León, México.



Nuevo León,México,paisaje urbano,noche,edificios,montañas

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias