Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Democrats win Virginia redistricting fight, threatening Republican House majority

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democrats scored a major victory Tuesday when Virginia voters narrowly passed a congressional redistricting referendum that could give the party a significant boost in the battle for the U.S. House of Representatives majority in this year’s midterm elections, The Associated Press reported at 8:49 p.m. ET.

Advertisement

The ballot measure gives the Democrat-controlled Virginia legislature — rather than the state’s current nonpartisan commission — temporary redistricting power through the 2030 election. It could result in a 10-1 advantage for Democrats in Virginia’s congressional delegation, up from their current 6-5 edge.

The referendum, which follows President Donald Trump’s push for rare but not unheard-of mid-decade redistricting in Republican-led states, would give the Democrats four additional left-leaning U.S. House seats ahead of the midterms as the party tries to win back control of the chamber from the GOP, which currently holds a razor-thin majority.

Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who in many ways became the face of her party’s push to pass the ballot initiative, said in a statement that «Virginia voters have spoken, and tonight they approved a temporary measure to push back against a President who claims he is ‘entitled’ to more Republican seats in Congress.» 

Advertisement

«Virginians watched other states go along with those demands without voter input — and we refused to let that stand. We responded the right way: at the ballot box,» the governor said.

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger speaks during a Virginians For Fair Elections canvassing event in Woodbridge, Va., on April 18, 2026. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

And Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin emphasized that «Virginians refused to let Trump play games with Americans’ right to fair representation.»

But Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said that «Virginia Democrats can’t redraw reality. This close margin reinforces that Virginia is a purple state that shouldn’t be represented by a severe partisan gerrymander. That’s exactly why the courts, who have already ruled twice to block this egregious power grab, should uphold Virginia law.»

And Hudson predicted, «Even under this map, Republicans will hold our majority based on our record cleaning up Democrats’ mess and a historic war chest to litigate the Democrats’ failures.»

Advertisement

Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Jeff Ryer said in a statement, «I know we are disappointed by tonight’s result. Evidently, a sufficient number of Virginians trusted the blatantly dishonest language the Democrats placed on the ballot to make our Commonwealth the most severely gerrymandered state in the nation.»

The standalone spring referendum capped months of political crossfire and court battles, sky-high early voting turnout and tons of national attention and money poured into the ballot box showdown.

Even though a majority of voters gave the ballot initiative a thumbs-up, it still faces legal challenges.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court of Virginia allowed the referendum to move forward after a lower court struck it down. But legal challenges to the referendum, filed in part by the Republican National Committee, the NRCC and the state GOP, remain unresolved and are still before Virginia’s highest court.

Republicans had railed against the Democrat-backed referendum.

«It’s the most partisan map in America,» former Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin told supporters at his final campaign stop in northern Virginia on the eve of the election.

Advertisement

Pointing to the Democrats pushing new maps, Youngkin charged, «What they are doing is immoral.»

Teaming up with Youngkin to crisscross the state in leading the GOP opposition to the ballot initiative was former Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares, who told the crowd the Democrats’ map is one that «you draw when you’re drunk with power.»

BATTLE FOR THE HOUSE RUNS THROUGH VIRGINIA AS COURT OKS HIGH-STAKES REDISTRICTING VOTE

Advertisement
Youngkin and Miyares lead the GOP opposition to the Democrat-fueled redistricting ballot measure

Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, right, and former state Attorney General Jason Miyares lead a chant of «no» as they lead Republican efforts to defeat a Democrat-backed congressional redistricting referendum April 20, 2026, in Leesburg, Va. (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

Speaking with Fox News Digital ahead of their final election eve rally, Miyares charged that «Democrats want to take away the voices of millions of Virginians and gerrymander the state.»

Youngkin, pointing to the duo’s relentless campaigning in recent weeks, said, «What we’re hearing over and over and over again is Virginians want fair maps. And what the yes vote represents are unfair maps.»

And the two Republicans reiterated their charge that the referendum was an «unconstitutional power grab» by Spanberger and the Democrats who control the state legislature.

Advertisement

As Youngkin and Miyares spoke in Leesburg, Trump took to the airwaves on a popular Virginia-based conservative talk show and later teamed up with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to urge voters to defeat the referendum.

Pointing to congressional Democrats, Trump warned that «if they get these additional seats, they’re going to be making changes at the federal level.»

SPANBERGER FACES ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ BACKLASH AHEAD OF CRUCIAL ELECTION

Advertisement
U.S. President Donald Trump speaking to media on the South Lawn of the White House

President Donald Trump headlined a tele town hall on the eve of Virginia’s congressional redistricting referendum urging voters to cast a ballot against the initiative. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Democrats countered that the redrawing of the maps was a necessary step to balance partisan gerrymandering already implemented by Republicans in other states at Trump’s urging.

«By voting yes, you have the chance to do something important — not just for the commonwealth, but for our entire country,» former President Barack Obama said in a video released Friday on the eve of the final day of early voting. «By voting yes, you can push back against the Republicans trying to give themselves an unfair advantage in the midterms.

«By voting yes, you can take a temporary step to level the playing field. And we’re counting on you.»

Advertisement

The video by Obama was the former president’s latest effort for the referendum. He had previously appeared in ads released by Virginians for Fair Elections, the Democrat-aligned group working to pass the ballot initiative.

OBAMA GOES ALL IN ON HIGH-STAKES REFERENDUM THAT MAY IMPACT MIDTERM ELECTIONS

But Virginians for Fair Maps, the leading Republican-aligned group opposing redistricting, used past comments by Obama against political gerrymandering in its ads opposing the referendum.

Advertisement

«Because of things like political gerrymandering, our parties have moved further and further apart, and it’s harder and harder to find common ground,» the former president said in an old clip showcased in the spot.

Republicans pointed to comments from Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, a former Virginia governor and former chair of the Democratic National Committee, who acknowledged over the weekend in a «Fox News Sunday» interview that the new maps don’t represent Virginia’s partisan breakdown.

«Ninety percent of Virginians are not Democrats, that’s true,» Kaine said.

Advertisement

But Kaine added that «about 100% of Virginians want election results to be respected.»

SOROS-BACKED GROUP AMONG LIBERAL ORGS PUMPING EYE-POPPING CASH INTO VIRGINIA GERRYMANDERING EFFORT

And Republicans took aim at Spanberger, who won November’s gubernatorial election by over 15 points as Democrats also captured the lieutenant governor and attorney general offices.

Advertisement

«Abigail Spanberger told everybody last summer that she had no interest in redistricting, and then the first bill she signs is a bill to enable the gerrymandering of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginians don’t like this and that’s why independents and a lot of Democrats are voting no too,» Youngkin told Fox News Digital.

Minutes later, Youngkin told the crowd that Spanberger is «trying to disenfranchise millions, millions of Virginians.»

Republicans trained their redistricting firepower on Spanberger since a poll two weeks ago by The Washington Post indicated that the new governor’s approval rating was barely above water, with the highest unfavorable rating for a new Virginia governor in two decades.

Advertisement

«She’s an unpopular governor with an unpopular agenda, and she lied to the voters,» Miyares charged.

Glenn Youngkin and Jason Miyares

Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, left, and former state Attorney General Jason Miyares, speak with Fox News Digital on the eve of Virginia’s congressional redistricting referendum in Leesburg, Va., April 20, 2026 (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

And Miyares and other top Republicans accused Spanberger of pulling a «bait and switch.»

Spanberger, in an ad in support of the referendum, said she was backing the measure because «it’s directly in response to what other states decide to do and a president who says he’s quote entitled to more Republican seats before this year’s midterms. Our approach is different. It’s temporary. It preserves Virginia’s fair redistricting process into the future.»

Advertisement

Supporters of redistricting dramatically outraised and outspent groups opposed to the referendum, with Virginians for Fair Elections outraising Virginians for Fair Maps by a roughly three-to-one margin. Much of the funding raised by both sides came from so-called «dark money» from nonprofit public policy groups known as 501(c)(4) organizations that are not required to disclose their donors.

Despite the Democrats’ funding advantage, recent polling suggested support for the ballot initiative was only slightly ahead of opposition amid a surge in early voting, which ended on Saturday.

«They have outspent us three to one. They’ve raised over $70 million. And yet this is a close vote,» Youngkin said.

Advertisement

Pointing to the ads in support of the referendum, Youngkin said Virginians «aren’t believing the mistruths. They aren’t believing the lies on TV. They’re actually doing the work themselves and understanding that a no vote is for fair maps and a yes vote is for the most gerrymandered maps in America.»

And Miyares emphasized that Democrats «outspent us, but we have the truth.»

Virginia is the latest battleground in the high-stakes fight between Trump and the GOP and Democrats over congressional redistricting.

Advertisement

Aiming to prevent what happened during his first term in the White House when Democrats reclaimed the House majority in the 2018 midterms, Trump last spring first floated the idea of rare, but not unheard of, mid-decade congressional redistricting.

The mission was simple: redraw congressional district maps in red states to pad the GOP’s fragile House majority to keep control of the chamber in the midterms, when the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats.

When asked by reporters last summer about his plan to add Republican-leaning House seats across the country, the president said, «Texas will be the biggest one. And that’ll be five.»

Advertisement

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas called a special session of the GOP-dominated state legislature to pass the new map.

But Democratic state lawmakers, who broke quorum for two weeks as they fled Texas in a bid to delay the passage of the redistricting bill, energized Democrats across the country.

Among those leading the fight against Trump’s redistricting was Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California.

Advertisement

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaking at a press conference in Sacramento

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an election night news conference at a California Democratic Party office in Sacramento Nov. 4, 2025. (Godofredo A. Vásquez/AP Photo)

California voters in November overwhelmingly passed Proposition 50, a ballot initiative that temporarily sidetracked the left-leaning state’s nonpartisan redistricting commission and returned the power to draw the congressional maps to the Democratic-dominated legislature.

That is expected to result in five more Democratic-leaning congressional districts in California, which aimed to counter the move by Texas to redraw their maps.

Advertisement

The fight quickly spread beyond Texas and California.

Republican-controlled Missouri and Ohio and swing state North Carolina, where the GOP dominates the legislature, have drawn new maps as part of the president’s push.

In blows to Republicans, a Utah district judge late last year rejected a congressional district map drawn by the state’s GOP-dominated legislature and instead approved an alternate that will create a Democratic-leaning district ahead of the midterms.

Advertisement

Republicans in Indiana’s Senate in December defied Trump, shooting down a redistricting bill that had passed the state House. The showdown in the Indiana statehouse grabbed plenty of national attention.

Florida is next up.

Two-term Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and state lawmakers in the GOP-dominated legislature are hoping to pick up an additional three to five right-leaning seats through a redistricting push during a special legislative session that kicks off April 28.

Advertisement
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaking at a news conference in Fort Lauderdale

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks during a news conference in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., July 22, 2025. (Amy Beth Bennett/South Florida Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service)

Hovering over the redistricting wars is the Supreme Court, which is expected to rule in Louisiana v. Callais, a crucial case that may lead to the overturning of a key provision in the Voting Rights Act.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

If the ruling goes the way of the conservatives on the high court, it could lead to the redrawing of a slew of majority-minority districts across the county, which would greatly favor Republicans.

Advertisement

But it is very much up in the air when the court will rule and what it will actually decide.

midterm elections, virginia, republicans elections, democrats, house of representatives, democrats elections, donald trump

INTERNACIONAL

Tras anunciar una extensión indefinida del alto el fuego con Irán, Trump ratificó que mantendrá el bloqueo a sus puertos

Published

on


El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, saluda con la mano al retirarse tras pronunciar un discurso, el 21 de abril de 2026 (REUTERS/Kylie Cooper)

En medio de la incertidumbre por una nueva ronda de negociaciones entre Estados Unidos e Irán y la prórroga de la tregua anunciada unilateralmente desde Washington, el presidente de Estados Unidos Donald Trump anunció mantendrá el bloqueo de las fuerzas estadounidenses a los puertos del régimen en el estrecho de Ormuz.

El mandatario sostuvo que la república islámica “no quiere que se cierre” la vía marítima estratégica a nivel mundial, “sino que se abra para poder ganar 500 millones de dólares al día (¡lo que pierden si permanece cerrado!)“.

Advertisement

Solo afirman que desean mantenerlo cerrado porque yo lo tengo completamente bloqueado (¡Cerrado!), así que buscan ‘salvar las apariencias’”, expuso Trump a través de la red Truth Social.

El inquilino de la Casa Blanca añadió que, días atrás, recibió mensajes de personas pidiéndole que diera inicio la reapertura del estrecho, pero aseguró que aún no lo permitirá.

“Hace cuatro días, varias personas se me acercaron diciendo: ‘Señor, Irán quiere reabrir el estrecho de inmediato’. Pero si hacemos eso, jamás podrá haber un acuerdo con Irán, ¡a menos que destruyamos el resto de su país, incluidos sus líderes!”, concluyó el mandatario.

Advertisement
El comentario de Donald Trump en Truth Social (@realDonaldTrump)
El comentario de Donald Trump en Truth Social (@realDonaldTrump)

Más tarde, utilizó la misma red social para asegurar que el país persa “se está derrumbando económicamente”. “Exigen la apertura inmediata del estrecho de Ormuz. ¡Están desesperados por dinero! Pierden 500 millones de dólares al día. Militares y policías se quejan de que no les pagan. ¡SOS!”, agregó en su perfil.

El presidente de Estados Unidos anunció que la tregua continuará vigente hasta que Irán presente una propuesta unificada en la mesa de negociación. Trump aseguró que el Irán atraviesa profundas divisiones internas y explicó que la decisión de prorrogar el alto el fuego responde a una solicitud expresa de Pakistán, país que actúa como mediador en el proceso.

En línea con el inquilino de la Casa Blanca, Scott Bessent, secretario del Tesoro de los Estados Unidos, adelantó que “en cuestión de días, los almacenes de la Isla de Kharg estarán llenos y los frágiles pozos petroleros iraníes quedarán cerrados”.

El funcionario subrayó la importancia de mantener la política de “máxima presión” mediante la operación «Furia Épica“, con el objetivo de debilitar la capacidad financiera y operativa de Irán, y explicó que el bloqueo naval apunta a frenar las exportaciones de crudo, principal fuente de ingresos del régimen, y forzar el colapso de su economía.

Advertisement
Estados Unidos intensificó sus maniobras militares frente al estrecho de Ormuz (@CENTCOM)
Estados Unidos intensificó sus maniobras militares frente al estrecho de Ormuz (@CENTCOM)

Desde Teherán, las máximas autoridades del régimen no emitieron declaraciones a medios locales o internacionales horas después del anuncio de Trump. Hasta el momento, el comandante de la Fuerza Aeroespacial de la Guardia Revolucionaria iraní, Seyed Mayid Musaví fue el único que brindó comentarios y aprovechó su comentario para amenazar a los países del Golfo.

“Los vecinos del sur de Irán deben saber que si su territorio y sus instalaciones se utilizan al servicio de los enemigos -en alusión a Estados Unidos e Israel– para atacar a la nación iraní, deberán decir adiós a la producción de petróleo en Medio Oriente”, afirmó en declaraciones recogidas por la agencia de noticias Tasnim, próxima a la Guardia.

Aunque Irán no mencionó a ningún país en particular en su advertencia, antes del acuerdo de alto el fuego con Washington, estados como Jordania, Bahréin, Kuwait, Qatar, Arabia Saudita y Emiratos Árabes Unidos fueron blanco de ataques iraníes en represalia por la ofensiva lanzada por Estados Unidos e Israel. En respuesta, Irán atacó objetivos en territorio israelí e intereses estadounidenses en la región.

Por su parte, un asesor del presidente del Parlamento iraní, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, sostuvo que “la continuación del asedio marítimo (de EEUU) no difiere del bombardeo” y que debe responderse “con una acción militar” por parte de Teherán.

Advertisement
El presidente del Parlamento iraní, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, se reunió con el jefe del ejército paquistaní, Asim Munir, en Teherán, Irán, el 16 de abril de 2026 (REUTERS)
El presidente del Parlamento iraní, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, se reunió con el jefe del ejército paquistaní, Asim Munir, en Teherán, Irán, el 16 de abril de 2026 (REUTERS)

“La parte perdedora no puede imponer condiciones. La continuación del asedio no difiere del bombardeo y debe responderse con una acción militar. El momento de tomar la iniciativa es de Irán”, amenazó.

(Con información de Europa Press)



Domestic Politics,Sports,North America,Government / Politics,Sport

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Top California Dem running for office tied to Chinese school accused of US diploma scandal

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

California State Treasurer Fiona Ma, who is running for lieutenant governor, is facing blowback for promising jobs and internships to students at a China-based boarding school accused of committing diploma fraud in conjunction with a California school district, after the school’s founder poured tens-of-thousands of dollars into her campaigns.

Advertisement

Pegasus California School, based in Qingdao, China, was the subject of a probe completed in February by California education officials in Riverside County, following concerns that the Val Verde Unified School District was illegally issuing diplomas to Pegasus’ China-based students. It also identified other potential concerns related to Pegasus and California education officials working for the district and the California Department of Education, indicating there was evidence of them engaging in potential fraud, misappropriation of funds and other illegal fiscal practices. The audit concluded that investigators found «a pattern of favors, official acts, promises, and payments» leading to the California Department of Education’s ultimate approval of a pilot program that allowed wealthy Chinese students to obtain a U.S. high school diploma overseas.

Meanwhile, a post on the school’s website shows Ma visiting in 2023, telling students, parents and teachers there that she would be able to help the enrollees at the school get jobs and internships back in the U.S. The same post on the school’s website heralded Ma’s visit as evidence of «the California government’s recognition and attention to Pegasus,» which became a sister-school to California’s Val Verde Unified School District in 2016 and started its pilot program issuing California diplomas a year later.

«Fiona chose Pegasus as the only school to visit in China, which shows the California government’s recognition and attention to Pegasus,» Pegasus bragged in the now-archived post from its website.

Advertisement

CHINESE EDUCATOR WITH SEVERAL CCP TIES COZIES UP TO TOP NEW YORK DEMOCRATS: ‘OUR OLD FRIEND WHO LISTENS’

It then included an excerpt from Ma: «I am honored to come to Qingdao Pegasus California School today to see many students perform and communicate with them. If they want to intern in California, they can come to me, I will provide some internship and employment opportunities.»

California Treasurer Fiona Ma smiles during an interview in San Francisco, California, U.S., on Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2018. Ma was elected California State Treasurer with more votes than any other candidate for Treasurer in the state’s history and was inaugurated on January 7, 2019. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg)

Advertisement

Steven Ma, who is unrelated to Fiona Ma but is Pegasus’ founder, directly contributed over $13,200 to her campaigns for State Treasurer and Lt. Gov., according to California campaign finance records dating back to 2021.

The Pegasus founder’s college-admissions consulting firm, ThinkTank Learning Inc. also contributed $23,800 to Ma’s campaigns since 2010, according to state campaign finance records.

TRUMP ADMIN SENDS WARNING TO CALIFORNIA AS TRANS ATHLETE ADVANCES IN STATE TRACK AND FIELD CHAMPIONSHIP

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to Ma multiple times for comment on her visit to the China-based school, and to the Val Verde school district itself to inquire whether it was aware of Ma’s visit, but did not receive a response.

Business Insider released a scathing report in 2021 calling out the Pegasus California School for its improper relationship with the Val Verde Unified School District, which Business Insider argues spurred the recently completed audit into Pegasus by California education officials. The China-based school, according to Business Insider, was charging up to $34,000 a year for students to enroll and, despite drawing on Val Verde resources, it functioned as a private boarding school. The school’s own website describes itself as an «independent» international school that uses a «fee payment and registration» framework for students after gaining admission, similar to how private schools in the U.S. operate, according to a Fox News Digital review.

Screenshot of Pegasus California Schools website homepage

A Riverside County school district is accused of improperly issuing diplomas to nonresident Chinese students through a partnership with a foreign sister school, according to a lengthy audit that found potential fraud and unlawful financial practices. (Fox News Digital)

A February 2018 Memorandum of Understanding between the China-based boarding school and Val Verde, reviewed by Fox News Digital, indicated that in return for receiving diplomas and teachers from the United States, ten students from the Val Verde school district would be afforded the opportunity to travel to China and attend Pegasus for 10 days at the cost of $300 a student. It also laid out an exchange program for students at Pegasus to visit schools’ in California. While the audit does not appear to identify any clear direct repayment from Pegasus to Val Verde itself, it does highlight travel, consulting opportunities, scholarships and other perks, like «great publicity,» that benefited officials and the district more than its own students.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Pegasus was allegedly telling its students and parents that it could guarantee them admission to one of the top 100 universities in the U.S., and if that didn’t happen, they would get a complete tuition reimbursement. A 2019 Memorandum of Understanding, included in the California audit, showed the University of California – Riverside even made a commitment that students who met certain academic thresholds would «receive a UCR scholarship.»

Students walking past Sather Gate on University of California Berkeley campus

Students walk past Sather Gate on the University of California Berkeley campus in Berkeley, Calif. The university’s Board of Regents postponed a vote on allowing immigrant students without legal status to apply for university jobs until 2025 on Jan. 25, 2024. (Ben Margot/AP)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Following the completion of the audit from Riverside County officials in February, announced publicly in March by Riverside County Superintendent of Schools Dr. Edwin Gomez, the California Department of Education issued a cease-and-desist demanding Pegasus terminate official statements on its website claiming it was founded in 2016 with the department’s «blessing and support.»

Advertisement

«California Business and Professions Code Section 17533.6 makes it unlawful for a non-governmental entity to use a state government name in a manner that could reasonably be interpreted or construed as implying connection, approval or endorsement by the state government,» stated the March cease-and-desist. «The above statement on your website could reasonably be interpreted or construed to imply that the California Department of Education is connected to, approves or endorses Pegasus California School. You are on notice that the California Department of Education is not connected to, does not approve and does not endorse Pegasus California School.»

high school, education, california, dept of education, controversies education

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Donald Trump evalúa mandar al Congo a afganos que colaboraron con Estados Unidos durante la guerra con los talibán

Published

on


Tras suspender un programa de reasentamiento de afganos que ayudaron a Estados Unidos en la guerra contra los talibanes, el presidente Trump está en conversaciones para enviar hasta 1.100 de ellos a la República Democrática del Congo, según declaró el martes un trabajador humanitario con información sobre el plan.

El grupo incluye intérpretes del ejército estadounidense, exmiembros de las fuerzas especiales afganas y familiares de militares estadounidenses que asistieron a EE.UU. en el conflicto bélico en Afganistán, que se inició en 2001 y se prolongó 20 años. Entre ellos hay más de 400 niños.

Advertisement

Los afganos llevan más de un año viviendo en una situación de incertidumbre en Qatar, tras haber sido evacuados por Estados Unidos en resguardo de su propia seguridad, debido a que apoyaron a las fuerzas estadounidenses durante la guerra contra los talibanes que comenzó en 2001.

Shawn VanDiver, presidente de la organización humanitaria AfghanEvac, declaró haber sido informado sobre el plan para el Congo por funcionarios del Departamento de Estado. Explicó que a los afganos se les daría a elegir entre regresar a vivir bajo el régimen talibán o ser enviados al Congo, que atraviesa una de las peores crisis humanitarias del mundo.

Según las Naciones Unidas, más de 600.000 refugiados, en su mayoría procedentes de la República Centroafricana y Ruanda, se encuentran actualmente en el Congo. Activistas de derechos humanos afirman que el país no está preparado para acoger a más personas en medio de los enfrentamientos con la vecina Ruanda, que ha provocado el desplazamiento de aún más personas debido a los ataques contra los campos de refugiados.

Advertisement

«Creemos que simplemente quieren enviar a estas personas de vuelta a Afganistán, donde saben que les espera una muerte segura», dijo VanDiver. «Saben que los afganos no van a aceptar a la República Democrática del Congo. ¿Por qué pasar de la primera crisis de refugiados del mundo a la segunda?».

Los debates ponen de relieve la tensión existente desde hace tiempo entre el compromiso de Estados Unidos con los afganos, que se enfrentan a un grave peligro como represalia por haber ayudado a las fuerzas estadounidenses durante la guerra, y la promesa del gobierno de Trump de restringir la inmigración.

Se desconocen muchos detalles sobre los planes que se están gestando, incluyendo si todos los afganos irían al Congo o si se estaban alcanzando acuerdos en otros países. Negociaciones como esta ya se han estancado anteriormente.

Advertisement

Un portavoz del gobierno congoleño no respondió de inmediato a una solicitud de comentarios. Tommy Pigott, portavoz del Departamento de Estado, acusó a la administración Biden de actuar de manera anticipada al traer aliados afganos a Estados Unidos. Añadió que la administración Trump estaba buscando opciones para los afganos que aún permanecían en el país.

«El pueblo estadounidense ha tenido que pagar las consecuencias de la irresponsable manera en que cientos de miles de afganos fueron traídos a Estados Unidos», declaró. «Ahora nos centramos en restablecer la rendición de cuentas promoviendo opciones de reasentamiento voluntarias y responsables».

Los diplomáticos estadounidenses llevan meses pidiendo a los países africanos que acojan a los afganos. Sin embargo, según VanDiver y diplomáticos con conocimiento de las conversaciones, las negociaciones fracasaron en muchos lugares.

Advertisement

Más de 190.000 afganos que colaboraron con la iniciativa estadounidense se reasentaron en Estados Unidos entre agosto de 2021 y mediados de 2025, tras superar los controles de antecedentes.

Un grupo de más de 1.100 afganos se encuentran alojados en una antigua base militar estadounidense en Qatar, conocida como Campamento As Sayliyah . El gobierno estadounidense los trasladó allí a finales de 2024 y les prometió la posibilidad de establecerse en Estados Unidos si superaban controles adicionales.

Qatar estaba pensado como escala, pero muchos afganos se encontraron en una situación de incertidumbre después de que la administración Trump pusiera fin a las políticas que les habrían permitido reasentarse en Estados Unidos.

Advertisement
Una compañía militar en Kandahar, en 2010. Ahor Trump evalúa mandar al Congo a afganos que colaboraron con EE.UU. Foto AFP

Algunas de las personas que permanecen en el campamento han sido sometidas a un control exhaustivo; otras no. Sin embargo, las políticas migratorias de Trump han imposibilitado que cualquiera de ellas ingrese a Estados Unidos en este momento. En enero, la administración anunció el cierre del campamento de tránsito sin especificar qué sucedería con las personas allí alojadas.

Andrew Sullivan, veterano militar y director ejecutivo de «No One Left Behind», una organización sin fines de lucro que trabaja para reasentar a afganos en Estados Unidos, afirmó que algunos habían sido declarados no elegibles por razones ajenas a la seguridad nacional. Por ejemplo, una mujer cumplió 21 años y ya no puede ser incluida en la visa de su padre, explicó.

Pero, según dijo, la administración tiene otras opciones disponibles para traerlos a Estados Unidos, incluida la posibilidad de conceder exenciones a la política.

«Creemos que si superan el control de seguridad, deberían venir a Estados Unidos», dijo el Sr. Sullivan. «Si no lo superan y no van a venir a Estados Unidos, creo que el gobierno estadounidense tiene la obligación de garantizar que vayan a un tercer país donde estén seguros, reciban apoyo y no existan problemas de derechos humanos».

Advertisement

Los diplomáticos estadounidenses llevan meses reuniéndose con funcionarios de la República Democrática del Congo. Recientemente, la administración Trump llegó a un acuerdo con el país para acoger a migrantes de otros países que se enfrentan a la deportación desde Estados Unidos. Parte de ese acuerdo incluyó una donación de 50 millones de dólares a la agencia de la ONU para los refugiados con el fin de brindar asistencia en el país.

Las conversaciones sobre los afganos son independientes del acuerdo de deportación, pero ambas son consecuencia de los drásticos cambios en la política migratoria de Trump.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias