Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

El 90% de los salvadoreños con Estatus de Protección Temporal no califica para las cinco vías planteadas por Estados Unidos, según experta

Published

on


Celia Medrano advirtió que la mayoría de los salvadoreños con TPS en Estados Unidos no cumple los requisitos de las cinco alternativas planteadas por el gobierno estadounidense. (EFE/Lenin Nolly/Archivo)

Celia Medrano, investigadora y consultora, explicó que, ante la incertidumbre sobre el futuro del Estatus de Protección Temporal (TPS) para los salvadoreños en Estados Unidos, el gobierno estadounidense ha presentado cinco alternativas para quienes podrían perder este beneficio. Medrano advirtió que la mayoría de los beneficiarios no puede acceder a ninguna de estas opciones.

Según lo relatado por Medrano, en la entrevista Diálogo, el secretario de Seguridad Nacional de Estados Unidos respondió a una carta de un congresista demócrata detallando que existen cinco posibles caminos para quienes pierdan el TPS. Medrano enfatizó que, según la respuesta oficial, “el noventa por ciento de tepesianos desfavorecidos por TPS actualmente no reúnen los requisitos para las cinco alternativas que usted plantea, porque son personas que pesa sobre ellos una decisión administrativa o de un tribunal migratorio de deportación, y eso está suspendido mientras gozan de TPS”.

Advertisement

Una de las alternativas es la petición familiar para obtener una residencia permanente o green card. Medrano señaló que este mecanismo es “difícil, muy difícil” para la mayoría, ya que requiere haber ingresado a Estados Unidos de manera regular, con visa, condición que no cumplen la mayoría de los tepesianos. Agregó que, si una persona decide regresar a El Salvador bajo la figura de autodeportación, enfrenta una penalidad de diez años sin posibilidad de trámite para reingresar al país.

Otra alternativa es el asilo. Medrano indicó que quienes tenían perfil para solicitarlo probablemente ya lo hicieron durante estos veinticinco años, y que ahora sería muy difícil que alguien bajo TPS pueda acceder a esta vía, aunque podrían existir excepciones si se demuestra un temor fundado por la vida o la integridad en caso de regresar a El Salvador.

Manos sostienen un cartel de cartón con las siglas TPS pintadas en azul y blanco. La letra P contiene el escudo nacional de El Salvador.
La petición familiar para obtener la green card exige ingreso regular a Estados Unidos y deja fuera a gran parte de los beneficiarios del TPS para salvadoreños. (Imagen Ilustrativa Infobae)

La opción de acceder a un estatus de no inmigrante, como ciertas clasificaciones temporales de estudiante o empleo, también está limitada. Medrano insistió en que el requisito principal es haber entrado con visa y no haber violado la ley migratoria, lo que excluye a la mayoría de los beneficiarios actuales.

La última opción mencionada es la acción diferida, que solo puede evaluarse caso por caso y requiere circunstancias extraordinarias. Medrano explicó que sería necesario demostrar situaciones muy específicas, como ser la única persona que cuida a un hijo con discapacidad en Estados Unidos. Solo en esos casos podría diferirse la orden de deportación.

Advertisement

El TPS vigente para El Salvador se originó en 2001, tras dos terremotos consecutivos que devastaron el país. Celia Medrano aclaró que este beneficio no se destinó a todos los salvadoreños que migraron tras los sismos, sino únicamente a quienes ya residían en Estados Unidos y pudieran demostrar que no podían regresar por la situación en el país.

Durante los veinticinco años de vigencia, distintos gobiernos salvadoreños han realizado gestiones constantes para lograr sucesivas extensiones del programa. Según Medrano, la última prórroga fue concedida en enero de 2025, poco antes de que finalizara el mandato del expresidente Joe Biden, y extendió la protección hasta el 9 de septiembre de 2026.

El asilo aparece como una vía limitada para quienes tienen TPS, salvo casos excepcionales con temor fundado de regresar a El Salvador. (Cortesía)
El asilo aparece como una vía limitada para quienes tienen TPS, salvo casos excepcionales con temor fundado de regresar a El Salvador. (Cortesía)

Al abordar el contexto actual, Medrano afirmó que la política migratoria de Estados Unidos está marcada por un endurecimiento, impulsado desde la presidencia de Donald Trump en su segundo mandato. Para ella, lograr una nueva extensión del TPS sería muy difícil, ya que iría en contra de la línea antimigratoria predominante en la administración estadounidense.

En medio de este panorama restrictivo, organizaciones promigrantes han solicitado que, tras los recientes terremotos en Venezuela, también se suspenda la cancelación del TPS para unos 600 mil venezolanos como una muestra de respaldo real. Medrano subrayó que, aunque Estados Unidos envía ayuda humanitaria a ese país, el verdadero apoyo sería permitir que estas personas no tengan que regresar.

Advertisement

Respecto a la relación bilateral, Medrano destacó que, aunque existe cierta cercanía entre los gobiernos de El Salvador y Estados Unidos, los temas de seguridad y los vínculos con China siguen siendo prioritarios para Washington. Naomi Fellows, encargada de negocios de la embajada estadounidense en El Salvador, recalcó que el TPS es “temporal” y que, en el caso salvadoreño, ya se ha extendido durante veinticinco años. Por su parte, Milena Mayorga, embajadora de El Salvador en Estados Unidos, afirmó en declaraciones de 2020 y 2026 que la única vía para una solución migratoria permanente es el Congreso estadounidense, aunque reconoció la falta de voluntad política para avanzar en ese sentido.

El TPS para El Salvador nació en 2001 tras los terremotos y la última prórroga otorgada por Joe Biden lo extendió hasta el 9 de septiembre de 2026. (EFE/Giorgio Viera/Archivo)
El TPS para El Salvador nació en 2001 tras los terremotos y la última prórroga otorgada por Joe Biden lo extendió hasta el 9 de septiembre de 2026. (EFE/Giorgio Viera/Archivo)

Al analizar el impacto demográfico, Medrano detalló que el segundo periodo del TPS para salvadoreños comenzó con 235 mil beneficiarios y ha descendido a 170 mil. Explicó que esta disminución obedece a que muchas personas han logrado regularizar su situación migratoria por otras vías, otros han perdido el TPS por faltas administrativas y algunos han optado por distintos procesos legales. Además, a lo largo de estos veinticinco años, según Medrano, unos 150 mil hijos de beneficiarios han nacido en Estados Unidos y cuentan con la ciudadanía estadounidense.

Medrano destacó que la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos ratificó, por seis votos contra tres en los casos de Haití y Siria, la potestad del Ejecutivo para cancelar el TPS. Señaló que esta resolución deja muy poco margen de acción para los beneficiarios, aunque insistió en la importancia de agotar los procesos judiciales para ganar tiempo o profundizar el debate constitucional.

También mencionó la decisión reciente del tribunal constitucional que negó la potestad presidencial para modificar el derecho a la ciudadanía de niños nacidos en territorio estadounidense, protegido por la decimocuarta enmienda. Explicó que esto garantiza la ciudadanía para todos los nacidos en Estados Unidos, independientemente del estatus migratorio de sus padres.

Advertisement



hombre,pancarta demografía inmigración,protesta,señalando

INTERNACIONAL

Biden special counsel’s ’runaway train’ scooped up sensitive lawmaker info: ‘Abuse of power’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into President Donald Trump swept up text messages from nearly 50 members of Congress, bypassing a required review process in what one victim alleged is a direct Constitutional violation.

Advertisement

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said the situation is more proof Smith’s probe was a «runaway train» of abuses of power, as the elder statesman and Senate Investigations Subcommittee chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., jointly released their filings Tuesday evening.

Grassley and Johnson’s findings come amid a full-scale probe of Operation Arctic Frost – the codename for Smith’s endeavor to investigate Trump for alleged corruption and election malfeasance – an operation top Senate Republicans call «worse than Watergate.»

LEGAL WAR ON TRUMP’S AGENDA GAINS FIREPOWER AS FEDERAL LAWYERS DEFECT TO DEMOCRATS

Advertisement

Jack Smith, former US special counsel, arrives for a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2025. Smith was subpoenaed to testify about his sweeping investigations into President Donald Trump’s actions, as part of an ongoing investigation the panel is conducting into the probes he led. (Getty Images)

Forty-four members of Congress had the contents of their text messages obtained and reviewed by the Smith’s team, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden  in a way that bypassed protocol. A «filter team» was tasked with reviewing millions of documents in the case and should have had first crack at determining whether such messages were relevant or potentially violated statute or ethics.

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., one of the lawmakers whose texts were swept up in this way, said Tuesday such texts being reviewed amounted to clear violations of the Constitution’s Speech & Debate Clause – which protects lawmakers from being questioned in «any other place» than the Capitol for legislative acts.

Advertisement

Internal communications have been historically included in that clause in the courts, as technology has advanced.

SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HEAD TO CAPITOL HILL FOR FIRST CONGRESSIONAL APPEARANCE SINCE 2019

Stefanik said in a statement that the new records prove Smith’s team «unlawfully and unconstitutionally accessed my private text messages, along with 43 other Members of Congress, in clear violation of the Constitution.»

Advertisement

She said she long-suspected there had been «unconstitutional spy[ing] on members of Congress.»

The records were provided by the Trump Justice Department to Grassley and Johnson, which the chairmen said indicated Smith’s team had «circumvented its own filter review process.» The process is additionally meant to protect attorney-client privilege, they said in a statement.

OBAMA-APPOINTED JUDGE TORCHES TRUMP ADMIN IN LATEST COURTROOM SHOWDOWN, REFERS ATTORNEY FOR BAR REVIEW

Advertisement
Jack Smith places hand over heart

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith says the Pledge of Allegiance before he prepares to testify during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill on January 22, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Al Drago/Getty Images)

The news also complicated some of Smith’s prior depositions under oath, including an excerpt in which he answered «no» to a question from a congressional counsel as to whether records he requested from congresspeople included text messages.

Johnson called the situation a «grotesque example» of Biden-era «weaponization» of the executive branch.

«Jack Smith’s criminal investigation of President Trump was a runaway train that had no brakes,» Grassley added Tuesday.

Advertisement

«Based on the information that’s been produced to me and Senator Johnson, Biden DOJ and FBI investigators apparently ignored their own routine investigative protocols to obtain and review work-related messages from me and dozens of my Republican and Democrat colleagues who were outside the scope of the government’s investigation.»

Grassley added that he hopes Democrats caught up in the otherwise bipartisan text tranche will finally discard their partisanship and recognize the severity of the alleged violations by Smith.

He also indicated he planned to recall Smith before Congress to «hold him accountable.»

Advertisement

Of the 44 members swept up in the text reviews, several were Democrats, including now-Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, as well as Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee – Rep. Adam Smith of Washington.

Grassley, Johnson and Stefanik were also swept up in the situation, along with top figures like Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, Rand Paul, R-Ky., former Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and the late Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

Former House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., was one of the victims, along with current House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, as well as House Freedom Caucus member Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, now-EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin of New York, now-Veterans Affairs Secretary Doug Collins of Georgia, and prominent Trump critic Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Several lawmakers sounded off on the news soon after Grassley announced his findings, including Hawley – who called for «everyone involved [to] be prosecuted.»

Advertisement

«Joe Biden’s DOJ not only tapped my phone; I just learned they illegally obtained my texts with members of President Trump’s administration,» the Missourian fumed.

Paul called the allegations a «blatant abuse of power and exactly what our Founders warned about,» while citing Smith’s past denial under oath.

Fox News Digital reached out to a representative for Smith for comment.

Advertisement

congress, justice department, investigations, chuck grassley, republicans, republicans, robert mueller

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Ucrania acusa a Rusia de haber ejecutado a cientos de prisioneros de guerra

Published

on


En su último mensaje, el esposo de Liudmyla Dubnytska le advirtió de que probablemente sería capturado por las fuerzas rusas. Dos días después, ella lo reconoció en un vídeo de soldados ucranianos muertos difundido en redes sociales.

Su pareja, Andriy Dubnytsky, está entre los cientos de prisioneros de guerra que, según el gobierno ucraniano, el ejército ruso ha ejecutado desde la invasión de 2022.

Advertisement

El número exacto se desconoce -varía según distintas fuentes ucranianas e internacionales-, pero Kiev afirma que las ejecuciones revelan una política deliberada de Moscú.

Dubnytsky tenía 25 años cuando fue asesinado en febrero de 2024, mientras las tropas ucranianas se retiraban de la ciudad de Avdiivka, epicentro de los combates en el este de Ucrania, en manos rusas.

Herido durante un intento de retirada, el soldado de la 110.ª brigada permaneció en su posición con cinco compañeros, cuatro de los cuales también estaban heridos.

Advertisement

A pesar de la situación, esperaban ser evacuados. Cuando llamó a su esposa el 15 de febrero, «estaba extremadamente nervioso y lloraba», relata Liudmyla, de 27 años, a la AFP.

Para mantener el ánimo, la pareja prometió tener un hijo al reunirse, un hermano para su hija pequeña.

Varias horas después, le envió un mensaje diciendo que probablemente serían capturados. Luego, dejó de responder.

Advertisement

Un vídeo difundido por medios ucranianos revela lo que probablemente ocurrió después: su compañero en el ejército Ivan Zhytnyk estaba haciendo una videollamada a un familiar cuando un soldado ruso le ordenó que depositara las armas.

Dos días más tarde, Liudmyla vio un vídeo en las redes sociales rusas con cinco cuerpos tendidos en un charco helado, teñido de rojo por la sangre.

Reconoció el tatuaje de una cruz en la mano de uno de los hombres: era su marido.

Advertisement

Aumento de los casos

La 110.ª brigada confirmó que varios soldados, entre ellos Dubnytsky y Zhytnyk, habían sido asesinados, acusando a las fuerzas rusas de violar un acuerdo para evacuarlos.

La fiscalía ucraniana abrió una investigación por el «disparo a prisioneros de guerra ucranianos desarmados».

Advertisement

No se trata de un incidente aislado. Varios funcionarios ucranianos explicaron a la AFP que a partir de 2023 las tropas rusas aumentaron el ritmo de las «ejecuciones».

«Esto se debe a una política rusa que, en la práctica, ha fomentado y facilitado este tipo de crímenes, y cuyos mandos han dado órdenes en ese sentido», declaró a la AFP Andriy Atamantchuk, miembro de la Fiscalía General de Ucrania y encargado de supervisar las ejecuciones de prisioneros de guerra. Moscú rechaza estas acusaciones.

Soldados de infantería ucranianos del Batallón Alcatraz, perteneciente a la 93.ª Brigada Mecanizada «Kholodnyi Yar» del Ejército, durante su período de entrenamiento militar intensivo. Foto EFE

Un informe de la ONU del mes pasado citaba 129 ejecuciones verificadas de prisioneros de guerra ucranianos, y la organización ya había alertado el año pasado sobre un «aumento marcado» de los casos.

Hasta la fecha, Kiev ha abierto 116 investigaciones sobre la muerte de 306 militares ucranianos desde 2022, según Atamantchuk, que apunta que la cifra real es probablemente mucho mayor.

Advertisement

Un funcionario de inteligencia ucraniano aseguró a la AFP que han registrado «más de 900 militares» muertos en «más de 340» incidentes desde 2022.

Bajo condición de anonimato, añadió que esto podría representar «entre el 25 % y el 40%» de los casos.

Las fuentes explicaron que la diferencia en las cifras se debe a la metodología.

Advertisement

La fiscalía afirmó que se basa en «hechos documentados y probados», mientras que los servicios de inteligencia reciben «información más rápidamente» de unidades en primera línea y otras fuentes.

Las autoridades rusas no respondieron a una solicitud de la AFP para comentar las acusaciones. Moscú ha rechazado sistemáticamente las acusaciones de crímenes de guerra y, a su vez, acusa a Kiev de cometerlos.

En virtud de los Convenios de Ginebra, los soldados se consideran prisioneros de guerra -y se les conceden las protecciones correspondientes- desde el momento en que se rinden de forma inequívoca.

Advertisement

Ucrania afirma que, en la mayoría de los casos, las víctimas son asesinadas a tiros. En 2023, un vídeo viral en redes sociales mostraba a un soldado ruso disparando a un militar ucraniano después de que este gritara «¡Gloria a Ucrania!».

Hasta ahora, solo cinco soldados rusos han sido condenados en Ucrania -dos de ellos en rebeldía-, según el fiscal Atamantchuk.

Sin embargo, no ha perdido la esperanza de hacer «justicia» algún día a las familias, aunque sea dándoles «los nombres de quienes mataron a sus seres queridos».

Advertisement

Para Dubnytska, conocer la identidad del asesino de su marido sería «inútil», dice con lágrimas en los ojos. «No sé cómo eso me aliviaría, aunque algún día supiera quién lo hizo».

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Mike Huckabee rejects Ro Khanna’s Israel visit claims: ‘Not held at gunpoint’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

JERUSALEM, Israel: U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, on Tuesday accused Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., of lying about consulting the American Embassy regarding his visit to the Biblical heartland of Israel.

Advertisement

Khanna visited the West Bank last week when he said his group was aggressively detained by Israeli settlers. Critics slammed his tour as political showmanship to advance a potential presidential campaign.

Huckabee took to X to reject the account of Khanna and his delegation, writing: «The left-wing activist who set up this stunt says ‘The embassy is involved.’ That is NOT TRUE. We did NOT know a member of Congress was coming. We would have said don’t go to restricted zone. As FACTS come out, it’s not helping the desired narrative. Not ‘held at gunpoint.»’ 

MEET THE FAR-LEFT INSURGENTS WAGING WAR ON THE DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT IN 2026 MIDTERMS

Advertisement

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee speaks to Fox News Digital during an interview at the American embassy in Jerusalem, Israel. (Yoav Dudkevitch/ TPS-IL)

Speaking to Fox News Digital on Tuesday, the California lawmaker said that he was detained by Israeli settlers for seventy-five minutes on Wednesday while visiting the West Bank (also known by its Biblical names Judea and Samaria). Khanna claimed, «We had informed the Israeli embassy.»

When asked about Ambassador Huckabee’s X post asserting the embassy did not know about his visit, he said «That is just false. He was misinformed.»

Advertisement

Khanna responded to Huckabee on X, stating «Ambassador, we have always had a relationship of mutual respect despite political differences. The IDF [Israel Defense Forces] has now clarified it was not a restricted zone and Israeli papers have confirmed this. Deputy Chief of Mission David Brownstein in our embassy did a superb job in getting us out. We are safe because of him. Please thank him. We obviously notified our Embassy and Israel’s embassy about the trip given we were in constant touch with David.»

Khanna said the «violent settlers who detained us need to be prosecuted and the IDF officers who furthered that detention need to be investigated. There were these extremist settlers who parked their car in front of our van denying us exit — there was only one road — they brandished an M4 gun and kicked our tires.»

U.S. Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) speaks with a Palestinian resident of Turmus Ayya, near Ramallah, during a visit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, July 9, 2026.

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., speaks with a Palestinian resident of Turmus Ayya, near Ramallah, during a visit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, July 9, 2026. (REUTERS/Ammar Awad)

Eitan Fischberger, an Israeli Mideast analyst, posted footage on X that he said debunked Khanna’s claims that he was violently detained. Fischberger wrote:» I encourage everyone to watch footage of Ro Khanna’s supposedly violent ‘detainment,’ which was released by the crazed activists on his own team. What a glorious self-own.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital sent a follow-up press query to Khanna about the video footage. He said the post by Fischberger is «false» and provided his X post with video footage. He wrote:» When the IDF arrived, they sided with the settlers & continued our detention. They made a huge mistake.» https://x.com/rokhanna/status/2075934812334915801?s=46

Khanna told Fox News that, «I told the Israeli government that I wanted to go on a Palestinian-led trip to the West Bank because I’d been [on] three trips to Israel. I had gotten Israel’s perspective, and that this trip I was going to go to the West Bank for a Palestinian-led look for three days. They knew that. And the point is that just because an American politician wants to get the side of Palestinians that does not give Israel the right to have violent settlers detain Americans with a passport that gives Israel the right to have IDF detain us. It’s not just me.»

Dan Diker, president of the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs, told Fox News Digital Khanna’s visit «appeared to be a publicity stunt in advance of his expected run for president in 2028. Let’s be honest, this was a publicity stunt.»

Advertisement

The Mideast expert Diker added that «Khanna’s 72-hour visit to several PLO- PA [Palestine Liberation Organization-Palestinian Authority] villages in Judea and Samaria was carried out without any security or diplomatic coordination with Israel either of these is the embassy in Washington or the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, or security forces in a particularly dangerous visit: his history of pro-Palestinian activism, and anti-Israel activism is well known.»

Diker claimed that, «Khanna had publicly endorsed a Palestinian state following the Oct. 7 Iran-backed Palestinian Hamas massacre aligning with pro-Hamas, pro BDS [Boycott, Divestment, Sanction campaign against Israel] groups such as American Muslims for Palestine.»

Hamas’ invasion of Israel on 10/7 resulted in the terrorist organization’s mass murder of over 1,200 people, including more than 40 Americans.

Advertisement

Khanna is also under fire from a fellow Democrat.

U.S. Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) speaks with a Palestinian resident of Turmus Ayya, near Ramallah, during a visit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, July 9, 2026.

U.S. Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) speaks with a Palestinian resident of Turmus Ayya, near Ramallah, during a visit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, July 9, 2026. (REUTERS/Ammar Awad)

Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-NJ., wrote on X that «What’s appalling is that Ro ignored requests to meet 10/7 survivors and hostages, or to visit sites of the 10/7 terrorist attacks. Instead, riding the anti-Zionist wave, he used the trip as a presidential campaign cameo.»

When Fox News Digital asked about Gottheimer’s criticism, including not meeting with 10/7 survivors, he said, «The purpose of this trip was a Palestinian-led tour through the West Bank.»

Advertisement

KAMALA HARRIS DROPS BIGGEST HINT YET ON 2028 WHITE HOUSE RUN

He noted that «I have been to Israel three times and met with hostage families.»

In response to Gottheimer’s accusation that he used the visit as a «presidential campaign cameo,» Khanna said «I do not know what he was talking about.»

Advertisement

Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, posted a lengthy response on X with respect to Khanna’s allegations that he was detained and his reported defamations of the Jewish state.

Leiter wrote, «Congressman Khanna was offered to coordinate his visit with the State of Israel — this goes beyond notifying of his presence in the country. He was offered in-depth coordination of his schedule to avoid misunderstandings, and he chose to ignore that offer. He also chose not to coordinate his visit with the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem.»

Leiter added «To add insult to injury – the Congressman used this instance as an opportunity to tout ‘genocide’ and ‘apartheid’ libels to the press, propelling himself to the center of yet another anti-Israel media frenzy. The facts don’t lie — this was a cheap, anticipated provocation, that could, and should have been avoided….I’d be happy to host Congressman Khanna at our embassy for an in-depth conversation on his grievances regarding Israel.»

Advertisement

Khanna told Fox News Digital that his office contacted Ambassador Leiter’s office after he offered to meet with the him. The congressman referred to his X post to Leiter. «…I am happy to take you up on your offer to meet because I want to turn this incident into something constructive for ordinary people in Palestine,» he wrote.

When asked about Leiter accusation that Khanna is defaming the Jewish state, Khanna said, «That’s what I believe happened and that’s what the U.N. believed happened.»

Ro Khanna West Bank

A handout image allegedly shows Israeli settlers blocking the convoy of U.S. Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA), his press team says, in Khirbet Zanuta, during a visit in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, July 8, 2026. (U.S. Congressman Ro Khanna’s Press Team/Handout via REUTERS )

Khanna said: «I want to be clear that I unequivocally reject Hamas terrorism and believe Israel has a right to exist. Hamas charter that calls for the destruction of Israel is appalling and why they are a terrorist group.» When pressed if Hamas’ invasion on 10/7 was genocidal and if the Hamas Charter is a genocidal document because it calls for the extermination of Jews and Israel, Khanna said it is «violent antisemitism,» and he repeatedly termed Hamas a terrorist organization but declined to call it a genocidal group.

Advertisement

ISRAEL SLAMS UN REPORT AS ‘POLITICAL BLOOD LIBEL’ FOR ALLEGING DELIBERATE TARGETING OF PALESTINIAN CHILDREN

Khanna also told Fox News Digital that he believes the Islamic Republic of Iran, which finances Hamas, is a state-sponsor of terrorism.

An IDF spokesperson told Fox News Digital on Tuesday that «The initial inquiry indicates that IDF soldiers were dispatched to the Khirbet Zanuta area in the Judea Brigade following reports that foreign nationals had entered an area that was believed to be a closed military zone. At the same time, an additional report was received regarding a road being blocked by Israeli civilians.»

Advertisement

The IDF spokesperson continued that «Upon arriving at the scene, the soldiers distanced the Israeli civilians away from the area and waited for confirmation that there was no security concern regarding the foreign nationals present at the location, and awaited confirmation that the area was not, in fact, a closed military zone. The convoy was then allowed to continue on its way. This process lasted several minutes. It should be emphasized that, throughout the incident, there was no physical confrontation or violence between those involved, and no such allegations were reported.»

According to the IDF spokesperson, «The armed individual present at the scene was an IDF soldier who was on leave. The matter is under review, and the soldier will be addressed accordingly. It should also be noted that the visit had not been coordinated with the IDF in advance. We emphasize that prior coordination of diplomatic visits is intended to prevent incidents of this nature. Such coordination is particularly important in areas where there is a risk of security-related incidents. The required conduct when interacting with diplomats will be further clarified and reinforced.»

Yechiel Leiter

Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter (Getty Images)

The Press Service of Israel(TPS-IL) conducted an investigation of the public row. An Israeli security official told TPS-IL that Khanna’s delegation did not coordinate its arrival in advance. «They did not coordinate the visit,» the official said. «Usually, advance notice is received.» According to the official, visits by foreign lawmakers and other prominent delegations to sensitive areas of Judea and Samaria are generally coordinated with Israeli authorities. Such coordination allows authorities to assess access restrictions, security conditions and logistical arrangements. The official said Israeli civilian security personnel arrived and blocked the delegation before troops intervened. «Settlers arrived, blocked them, the army dispersed them and that was basically the end of the incident,» the official said.

Advertisement

The source added that security forces sought to resolve the obstruction quickly after learning that the vehicles had been blocked.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Diker sees the 2028 Presidential election cycle as the magnet for attracting some candidates to Israel with their alleged anti-Israel personal agendas.

Advertisement

Diker said «The point here is that U.S. presidential politics, on the left flank of the Democratic party, now exploits what can be called Israel- cancellation, or the inversion of legitimacy between Hamas – PLO and Israel as part of the unresolved Palestinian question as a major national issue for the American people, not the Islamic Republic of Iran and its global terror proxies, and it’s interruption of global oil shipping, kidnapping the global economy, nor is the issue the ongoing Russia, Ukraine situation, the Chinese communist parties infiltration of technology and other assets in the West or the Islamic infiltration of America.»



middle east, hamas, national security, foreign affairs, israel, congress, house of representatives politics

Continue Reading

Tendencias