INTERNACIONAL
Can King Charles save the ever-fracturing ‘special relationship’ after Trump anger at Starmer over Iran war?
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
As Britain publicly distances itself from President Donald Trump’s Iran pressure campaign, King Charles III’s upcoming visit is shaping up as more than royal pageantry.
It may be Britain’s most important diplomatic tool for preventing growing policy fractures with Washington from becoming something deeper.
«The British monarch has historically had huge importance in terms of creating personal diplomacy to smooth over ruffled feathers,» Alan Mendoza, executive director of the Henry Jackson Society, a London-based think tank, told Fox News Digital, arguing that the crown has often served as Britain’s strategic stabilizer during moments of political strain.
Mendoza said Charles could play a critical role at a moment when Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government and Trump appear increasingly divided over Iran, defense strategy and the future shape of the transatlantic alliance.
TRUMP SLAMS STARMER AS ‘NOT WINSTON CHURCHILL’ FOR REFUSAL TO BACK IRAN STRIKES
The trip began in Washington, D.C., where King Charles and Queen Camilla were greeted by President Donald Trump and Melania Trump for a private tea. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
«King Charles has the opportunity, through personal diplomacy, to create a new beginning with Donald Trump,» Mendoza said.
Britain’s balancing act became clearer Monday when Deputy Minister Stephen Doughty publicly rejected U.S. blockade tactics against Iran, while still backing Washington’s broader effort to secure maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
«While the U.K. doesn’t support the U.S. blockade, it supports working with the United States and others to reopen the Strait of Hormuz,» Doughty said ahead of a U.N. Security Council meeting, according to The Associated Press, warning Tehran cannot be allowed to hold «the rest of the world to ransom.»
The split underscores London’s effort to support U.S. security goals without fully endorsing Trump’s «economic fury» strategy, which aims to strangle Iran’s economic lifelines through aggressive maritime pressure.
That policy divergence has intensified scrutiny over whether Charles’ visit is now functioning as a diplomatic pressure valve.
A White House spokesperson emphasized the visit as a sign of enduring personal rapport between the president and the monarch. «President Trump has always had great respect for King Charles, and their relationship was further strengthened by the president’s historic trip to the United Kingdom last year,» White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told Fox News Digital. «The president enjoyed welcoming their majesties to the White House, and he looks forward to more special events throughout the week.»
AS AIRSTRIKES RAIN DOWN ON THE IRANIAN REGIME, CAN A FRACTURED OPPOSITION UNITE TO LEAD IF IT FALLS?
King Charles III and Queen Camilla disembark their plane at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on April 27, 2026, beginning their State Visit to the United States to celebrate the country’s 250th anniversary of independence. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Mendoza pointed to Queen Elizabeth II’s past interventions as evidence that the monarchy can sometimes succeed where elected leaders cannot.
He cited Elizabeth’s historic role in easing tensions with Ireland and described royal diplomacy as uniquely positioned to create trust at the personal level.
«People often wonder why the British monarchy still exists in the 21st century,» Mendoza said. «This is why.»
Still, Mendoza was careful not to overstate the king’s role.
Charles, he said, is unlikely to directly influence specific policies on Iran, NATO or military cooperation. Instead, his greatest value lies in shaping what Mendoza called the «general mood music» around Trump’s willingness to engage.
«It’s more a question of general mood music, which could make the president more receptive to interesting solutions,» Mendoza said.
That distinction may prove crucial.
Rather than forcing policy alignment, Charles could help preserve the broader strategic atmosphere needed to keep Washington and London functioning as close allies even while their elected governments disagree.
KING CHARLES SENDS PERSONAL MESSAGE OF CONGRATULATIONS TO TRUMP ON SWEARING-IN
Prince Charles and Camilla hosted President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump during a state visit in 2019. (Chris Jackson – WPA Pool/Getty Images)
For Britain, that may be particularly important as outside analysts warn that the «special relationship» is under mounting structural strain.
In an analysis published Monday, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Matthias Matthijs argued that while the royal visit offers «spectacle and ritual,» it is unlikely to reverse what he described as the deeper unraveling of U.S.–U.K. ties.
Matthijs pointed to Trump’s repeated criticisms of Starmer about immigration, energy policy and Britain’s posture toward the U.S.-Israeli confrontation with Iran, suggesting Charles may now be doing much of the diplomatic «heavy lifting» required to preserve British access to Trump.
Meanwhile, constitutional scholars in Britain have also raised concerns.
Writing for the U.K. Constitutional Law Association earlier in April, Francesca Jackson warned that using the monarch as a diplomatic instrument during periods of sharp political volatility could expose the Crown to political backlash or «potential embarrassment,» especially if Charles is perceived as caught between Trump and Starmer.
That risk reflects the broader stakes.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
King Charles III and President Donald Trump inspect the Guard of Honour during the state visit at Windsor Castle in Windsor, England, Sept. 17, 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
If Trump embraces Charles while continuing to criticize Starmer, the visit could preserve royal rapport while underscoring political dysfunction, effectively creating a parallel diplomatic lane between Washington and the British Crown.
But for now, Mendoza argues, the monarchy’s purpose is not governance, but access to the king, which may still have a chance to keep the relationship from fracturing beyond repair.
Fox News Digital reached out to Prime Minister Starmer’s office for comment.
king charles iii, donald trump, foreign policy, united kingdom, british royals
INTERNACIONAL
El caso Lyhanna: Francia cuestiona la justicia tras el asesinato de una niña de 11 años y las fallas en la investigación de su presunto asesino
La justicia cuestionada
El hermano también está detenido
Tensiones políticas y judiciales
La lucha contra la violencia sexual
Magistrados furiosos
Un pedófilo nunca investigado
INTERNACIONAL
Obama-appointed judge who blocked Trump birthright citizenship order strikes again, throws out visa overhaul
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
An Obama-appointed federal judge who previously blocked President Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order has again dealt a major setback to the administration by striking down Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa payment requirement and declaring the policy unlawful.
U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin of Massachusetts ruled Monday that the Trump administration lacked the authority to impose the hefty payment on employers seeking new H-1B visas, finding that the requirement amounted to a tax that only Congress has the constitutional power to impose.
In Monday’s 42-page decision, Sorokin sided with a coalition of 20 states that challenged Trump’s September 2025 proclamation creating a new $100,000 payment requirement for employers filing petitions for foreign workers under the H-1B visa program, which allows U.S. employers to hire skilled foreign workers. Approximately 65,000 foreign workers are issued a H-1B visa each year.
TRUMP’S $100K H-1B VISA OVERHAUL COULD HIT TECH GIANTS LIKE AMAZON AND MICROSOFT HARDEST
U.S. President Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. (Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Before Trump’s proclamation, employers typically paid between $2,000 and $5,000 in filing fees to sponsor an H-1B worker, depending on the type of application and the size of the company.
The administration had argued that the measure was necessary to curb abuse of the visa system and protect American workers.
Trump’s proclamation stated that the H-1B program had been exploited to replace U.S. workers with lower-paid foreign labor and that the new payment would help address those concerns.
Sorokin rejected the administration’s legal justification, finding that the Immigration and Nationality Act gives presidents broad authority over the entry of noncitizens but does not authorize them to impose taxes.
«While the Executive has broad discretion over the admission and exclusion of aliens, … that discretion is not boundless,» Sorokin wrote, referring to previous case law.
Sorokin concluded that the payment functioned as a tax rather than a permissible immigration restriction.
TRUMP IS DOWN BUT NOT OUT IN COURT BATTLE OVER HARVARD’S FOREIGN STUDENT VISAS
«The Court finds that the Policy imposes a tax on H-1B petitions without the requisite delegation by Congress,» Sorokin wrote.
He further rejected the administration’s argument that the payment requirement was simply another immigration restriction, bluntly stating: «Taxes are not ‘restrictions.’»
Beyond the constitutional concerns, Sorokin also found that federal agencies violated the Administrative Procedure Act by implementing the policy without notice-and-comment rule making and concluded that the agencies exceeded their statutory authority.
As a remedy, Sorokin declared the policy unlawful and vacated it in its entirety.
Signage for the U.S. Department of State is displayed outside its headquarters in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington, D.C., on April 15, 2025. (Jim Watson/AFP)
Sorokin, a Yale and Columbia Law School graduate, was nominated to the federal bench by President Barack Obama in 2013 and confirmed by the Senate in 2014. Last year, Sorokin was the fourth judge to issue a nationwide injunction blocking Trump’s executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship. He ruled that the policy is likely unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. That dispute has since reached the Supreme Court, and a ruling is expected in the coming weeks.
The administration is expected to appeal Sorokin’s decision, setting up another legal battle over the scope of presidential authority in immigration matters and the limits of executive power.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«President Trump has clear legal authority to restrict entry of any class of aliens he determines is not in America’s best interests, and that is exactly what he did,» White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Fox News Digital. «The H-1B program has been abused for decades, and President Trump finally took action to fix it. A federal judge in Washington already upheld a nearly identical order, and the Administration is confident this order will be reversed on appeal.»
In a separate challenge filed in December 2025, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington declined to block the policy after dismissing claims from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that the additional H-1B charge violated federal immigration law.
federal courts, immigration, congress, donald trump, federal judges, taxes, politics
INTERNACIONAL
Tensión en el Báltico: la OTAN derribó un dron que ingresó al espacio aéreo de Letonia procedente de Rusia
Un avión de combate francés que opera bajo mando de la OTAN derribó este lunes un dron que había penetrado en el espacio aéreo de Letonia tras aproximarse desde territorio ruso.
Según informó el ministro de Defensa letón, Raivis Melnis, la decisión de neutralizar la aeronave fue tomada por el mando de la OTAN después de evaluar la situación en la zona. El aparato fue destruido cerca de la localidad de Berzgale, a pocos kilómetros de la frontera con Rusia. Las autoridades indicaron que no hubo víctimas ni daños materiales.
De acuerdo con información oficial, los aviones despegaron desde la base aérea de Siauliai, en el norte de Lituania, y derribaron el dron alrededor de las 10:00 de la mañana, hora local.
El Ejército letón señaló que se trató de “un vehículo aéreo no tripulado extranjero que ingresó al espacio aéreo letón como resultado de la guerra electrónica rusa”.
La ministra de Relaciones Exteriores de Letonia, Baiba Braze, agradeció la actuación de las fuerzas aliadas y escribió en redes sociales: “¡Gracias a nuestros aliados franceses por derribar el dron que ingresó al espacio aéreo letón!”.
Aunque todavía no se ha precisado el modelo del dron ni se ha determinado oficialmente quién lo operaba, el incidente marca un precedente para Letonia. De acuerdo con información publicada por The Washington Post, se trata de la primera ocasión en que la OTAN ordena el derribo de un dron sobre territorio letón.
Desde el inicio de la invasión rusa de Ucrania, los gobiernos de Europa del Este han denunciado repetidos incidentes relacionados con drones, misiles y operaciones de guerra electrónica cerca de sus fronteras.
Los últimos meses han estado marcados por varios episodios similares. Estonia, Lituania y Rumania han registrado incursiones o caídas de drones en zonas próximas a Ucrania, generando respuestas de emergencia y cuestionamientos sobre la capacidad de defensa aérea de la región.
En Lituania, por ejemplo, una incursión aérea reciente provocó medidas extraordinarias de seguridad para proteger a las máximas autoridades del país. En Rumania, un dron impactó contra una zona residencial cercana a la frontera ucraniana y dejó varios heridos.
El incidente de este lunes llega además en un momento particularmente sensible para Letonia. El país viene atravesando un intenso debate sobre la seguridad nacional después de varios episodios relacionados con aeronaves no tripuladas.
La preocupación se profundizó durante el período previo a las últimas elecciones nacionales, cuando diversos drones terminaron cayendo dentro del territorio letón. Aquellos hechos derivaron en una crisis política que desembocó en cambios dentro del Gobierno y cuestionamientos a la conducción del área de defensa.
Para los países bálticos —Letonia, Estonia y Lituania— la guerra en Ucrania representa una amenaza directa debido a su proximidad geográfica con Rusia y Bielorrusia. Los tres Estados integran la OTAN desde 2004 y han impulsado una política de fuerte respaldo a Kiev desde el inicio del conflicto.
La misión aérea que permitió derribar el dron forma parte precisamente del dispositivo permanente de vigilancia que la alianza mantiene sobre el espacio aéreo báltico. Aviones de distintos países aliados rotan periódicamente para garantizar la protección de la región.
El episodio también volvió a abrir un debate estratégico dentro de Europa: cómo responder de manera eficaz al creciente uso de drones en conflictos modernos.
Según explicó The Washington Post, muchos gobiernos europeos consideran que utilizar aviones de combate y misiles de alto costo para destruir aparatos relativamente baratos plantea interrogantes sobre la sostenibilidad de estos sistemas de defensa.
Como respuesta, varios países han comenzado a invertir en nuevas tecnologías antidrones, sistemas de detección temprana y capacidades de guerra electrónica. Letonia, por ejemplo, planea desplegar más unidades especializadas a lo largo de su frontera con Rusia y Bielorrusia para interceptar amenazas de este tipo antes de que ingresen en profundidad a su territorio.
Mientras continúan los ataques con drones tanto en Ucrania como dentro de Rusia, los países de la OTAN observan con atención cualquier incidente en sus fronteras. El derribo ocurrido este lunes en Letonia refleja hasta qué punto la guerra ha ampliado sus efectos más allá del campo de batalla y se ha convertido en una preocupación permanente para la seguridad europea.
Defense,Europe,Top Pictures
Con críticas al Gobierno, el camarista Leopoldo Bruglia solicitó a la CIDH una cautelar para evitar ser reemplazado
Bullrich se despega de los partidos y construye liderazgo propio: por qué su imagen supera a la de Milei
Luis Ventura y Marina Calabró debutaron en América TV en el espacio que era de Karina Mazzocco y le mandaron un mensaje picante
El embajador británico calificó de “inaceptable” que se intimide a los periodistas
El salario mínimo vale menos que en 2001 y debería triplicarse para recuperar su poder de compra original
El estricto operativo de seguridad que tuvo que soportar el plantel de Uzbekistán en Nueva York
Desde Neuquén, Myriam Bregman pidió “organizar la bronca para terminar con Milei y su legado”
Cuantas reservas internacionales quieren acumular Milei y Caputo para evitar el riesgo K en 2027
Murió el Indio Solari, mítico cantante de Los Redonditos de Ricota
Senado: postergan el proyecto de propiedad privada por dudas de los bloques aliados sobre compras de tierras por extranjeros
POLITICA2 días agoDesde Neuquén, Myriam Bregman pidió “organizar la bronca para terminar con Milei y su legado”
- ECONOMIA2 días ago
Cuantas reservas internacionales quieren acumular Milei y Caputo para evitar el riesgo K en 2027
- POLITICA9 horas ago
Reforma laboral: qué cambia para los trabajadores con la revisión de más de 100 convenios colectivos vencidos
