INTERNACIONAL
Climate seminars for judges face funding trail probe amid fears of outside influence on courts
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
FIRST ON FOX: A government watchdog group is pursuing a new possible paper trail to find out who is funding climate presentations for judges, filing public records requests for financial information that could reveal how outside advocacy groups influenced the presentations.
Government Accountability & Oversight (GAO), a nonprofit, made recent Freedom of Information Act requests, reviewed by Fox News Digital, for emails and financial records held by the Treasury Department that GAO says could show whether funds connected to the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) moved through the Federal Judicial Center Foundation.
The effort comes as Republican lawmakers and legal critics scrutinize whether the seminars exposed judges to one-sided climate presentations from figures they say are connected to the broader plaintiffs-side climate litigation network, raising concerns about whether the programs created an appearance of partiality for judges who could later hear related lawsuits.
CLIMATE JUSTICE GROUP HAS DEEP TIES TO JUDGES, EXPERTS INVOLVED IN LITIGATION AMID CLAIMS OF IMPARTIALITY
People involved in climate activism hold a demonstration in Manhattan to demand an end to fossil fuel funding by Wall Street and the American government on Sept. 18, 2023, in New York City. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
The FOIA requests were significant, GAO legal counsel Chris Horner told Fox News Digital, because they opened up a new path for his group and congressional investigators to pursue as they probe what role the Federal Judicial Center, which is a research arm of the taxpayer-funded judicial branch, had in hosting the seminars.
While it is not necessarily subject to FOIA requests, Horner said that records belonging to the Federal Judicial Center Foundation, created by Congress as a 501c1, are public. That means the foundation, which is authorized to take donor money to support events, should have a public paper trail, Horner said.
Fox News Digital reviewed ELI’s tax records, including 990 forms beginning in 2019, which showed multimillion-dollar lump sums designated, in part, for educating judges. Horner said his group was looking to understand the «mechanics» behind that funding.
«Judges are getting from the courtroom to the resort. How does that happen?» Horner asked, questioning if the Federal Judicial Center, a public, impartial entity, was improperly using ELI’s money to facilitate judges’ attendance at the controversial seminars.
The seminars at issue were climate-related judicial education programs involving the Federal Judicial Center and ELI’s Climate Judiciary Project, which ELI launched in 2018 to provide judges with instruction on climate science, climate impacts and climate-related litigation.
The Federal Judicial Center previously told Fox News Digital it held a series of small, one-day seminars with ELI for fewer than 100 judges in 2019 and early 2020, before the programs became the subject of scrutiny from Republican lawmakers, conservative legal critics and energy industry advocates. The Federal Judicial Center said last year it stopped working with ELI in 2020. Fox News Digital reached out to ELI and the Federal Judicial Center for comment on the current status of the seminars.
Nick Collins, an ELI spokesperson, said in a statement that ELI’s climate project began because courts were seeking out education on the topic. He denied that the project had ties to current climate litigation that judges might be presiding over.
«[The Climate Judiciary Project] partners with leading educational institutions to provide those courses which are no different than other judicial education programs providing training on legal and scientific topics that judges voluntarily choose to attend,» Collins said. «CJP does not participate in litigation, coordinate with parties related to any litigation, or advise judges on how they should rule on any issue or in any case.»
GAO argued in its FOIA requests that the Federal Judicial Center Foundation is a government agency and that the statute that established the foundation authorized it to maintain a fund with the Treasury, where all the foundation’s donations could be held. GAO said the public should have access to those account statements showing deposits and disbursements.
The FOIA requests targeted records spanning multiple years, including the potential Treasury-held data dating back to 2015, as well as records from 2019 to 2021 tied to the climate seminars specifically.
The requests did not establish that any funds were improperly used, but GAO said the records could clarify how outside money was handled by a public institution.
Horner called it a «big gap in the stone wall,» referencing what he viewed as an opening to learn more about what has long been a murky understanding of financial ties between the Federal Judicial Center and private entities helping to bring the climate lawsuits.
Horner noted ELI’s well-documented connections to plaintiffs who have brought numerous lawsuits against major oil companies like Shell, BP and ExxonMobil in the name of addressing climate change.
«The judiciary has been caught in bed with the plaintiffs, and the judiciary apparently wants to hide the evidence rather than be transparent about it, which certainly does not inspire confidence,» Horner said.
MAJOR ‘CLIMATE DECEPTION’ LAWSUIT AGAINST BIG OIL VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED
AUSTIN, TEXAS – AUGUST 05: An Exxon gas station is seen on August 05, 2024 in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images) (Brandon Bell)
ELI is connected to litigators involved in the uptick in recent years in the lawsuits against oil companies, including through its former board member Ann Carlson. ELI’s Climate Judiciary Project maintains that it is a «neutral, objective» resource for judges, but its curriculum has been fossil fuel-averse. The Climate Judiciary Project educates the very judges who could end up presiding over cases against the oil companies.
ELI «intends to accomplish via the courts what it cannot get enacted into law: a radical environmental agenda,» Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, alleged in a 2024 letter.
GAO lawyers argued in their FOIA requests that the foundation’s financial information was of great public interest because judges were effectively being lobbied on how to handle climate cases through these seminars, and the foundation could have had a role in funding them.
«These seminars were arranged by parties affiliated with the plaintiffs’ legal team yet presented as the objective background which judges should know about climate science,» the GAO lawyers wrote in the FOIA requests. «The Federal Judicial Center Foundation is authorized to accept gifts to underwrite such seminars.»
Sen. Ted Cruz speaks during a roundtable discussion at the U.S. Capitol on March 3, 2025, in Washington, DC. (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)
Critics like Cruz and GAO have long contended that the seminars were not neutral and instead part of a broader climate litigation ecosystem. Judges attending seminars on any given topic would normally be a nonissue, but the concerns have zeroed in on who may be influencing the judges and whether they are part of the same network advancing the climate lawsuits.
Like GAO, Congress has been probing the financials as part of its oversight of the judicial branch. In January, the House Judiciary Committee said ELI, and its Climate Judiciary Project, appeared to target judges in jurisdictions where climate cases would be heard. The letter noted that ELI has said its Climate Judiciary Project began in 2018 «in coordination with» the Federal Judicial Center.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
GAO’s FOIA letters signal that the Federal Judicial Center Foundation could be a missing link in understanding who paid for the seminars and how the Federal Judicial Center was involved with the privately funded programs, which lawmakers say could be at odds with policies that the U.S. courts are required to follow.
Fox News Digital reached out to Carlson, as well as the Federal Judicial Center, the Federal Judicial Center Foundation and the Treasury Department for comment on the FOIA requests.
federal judges, climate, energy, judiciary, politics
INTERNACIONAL
El Gobierno asegura que un buque de guerra británico navegó por aguas argentinas sin permiso y evalúa presentar un reclamo diplomático
La navegación de un buque de guerra británico desde las Islas Malvinas hacia Punta Arenas en Chile despertó un choque de posiciones sobre si el patrullero HMS Medway de la Royal Navy había notificado a la Argentina sobre su paso por aguas de soberanía nacional.
Según le aseguraron a TN distintas fuentes oficiales, la Armada Argentina identificó el desplazamiento del patrullero oceánico del Reino Unido hacia finales de la semana pasada y constató que no había existido previo aviso para navegar aguas argentinas.
Este episodio fue notificado por la Armada a la Cancillería argentina, desde donde la Secretaría de Malvinas, Antártida y Atlántico Sur evalúa una serie de medidas, que podrían incluir una protesta diplomática formal.
El Gobierno argentino podría aludir al llamado Acuerdo de Madrid II, firmado entre ambos gobiernos en 1990. Con ese convenio se creó un Sistema Transitorio de Información y Consulta Recíprocas (STICR) para intercambiar información sobre movimientos militares en el Atlántico Sur. El desplazamiento del buque militar británico fue informado a la Cancillería argentina, que evalúa los próximos pasos. (Foto: NA)
Sin embargo, ante la consulta de este medio a Londres, fuentes del Foreign Office rechazaron la versión argentina y aseguraron que “la Embajada (británica en Buenos Aires) notificó de forma anticipada y por los canales apropiados” que el HMS Medway iba a navegar hasta Punta Arenas.
La navegación de un buque nuevo en el patrullaje de la región
Las autoridades argentinas indicaron que el buque de guerra británico ingresó en aguas bajo jurisdicción nacional a la altura de Santa Cruz para luego continuar hacia Tierra del Fuego.
El seguimiento del buque fue realizado por la Armada Argentina mediante sensores electrónicos desplegados en el litoral austral. Además, una aeronave Beechcraft B-200M “Cormorán” del Comando de Aviación Naval registró el tránsito utilizando el sistema electroóptico WESCAM MX-10. Parte de esta tecnología fue incorporada tras acuerdos militares con Estados Unidos.
Leé también: Dos bombas explotaron frente al hotel donde se aloja Emmanuel Macron en su visita a Siria
El Medway es un patrullero de la clase River Batch 2 de 90 metros de eslora y unas 2.000 toneladas de desplazamiento que está en servicio de la Royal Navy desde 2019.
El buque está desplegado en el Atlántico Sur desde enero de este año cuando relevó al HMS Forth para cumplir tareas de vigilancia como patrullero permanente en la zona. Su principal área de movimiento es alrededor de las Islas Malvinas, aunque en estos meses se desplazó hacia otros puntos.
Después de atravesar el extremo austral, el HMS Medway arribó el domingo a Punta Arenas, en Chile, donde permanecería hasta el 8 de julio para realizar tareas de reaprovisionamiento. La Argentina firmó distintos acuerdos de cooperación militar con Estados Unidos con la intención de fortalecer la presencia y vigilancia en el Atlántico Sur. (Foto: Ministerio de Defensa)
Si bien la principal base militar británica en la región se encuentra en Monte Agradable, en las Islas Malvinas, la continuidad de sus operaciones también dependen de una red de puertos, aeropuertos y servicios de apoyo distribuidos en el extremo sur del continente.
Allí toma relevancia la cooperación militar entre Londres y Santiago de Chile. La buena sintonía entre José Antonio Kast y Javier Milei por ahora no impactó en la relación ya establecida entre Chile y el Reino Unido.
La Argentina es consciente de que en las últimas décadas se perdió terreno en lo que es el fortalecimiento de la presencia militar en el Atlántico Sur, por lo que las nuevas herramientas de cooperación incorporadas en el último tiempo apuntan a revertir esta situación.
Esto se suma a la intención de Estados Unidos de ganar influencia en una región donde prácticamente no tiene presencia. En este contexto se explica la cercanía militar entre Washington y Buenos Aires, que acompaña pero al mismo tiempo trasciende las miradas políticas de sus respectivos presidentes.
Reino Unido, Armada Argentina, Islas Malvinas, Cancillería, Atlántico Sur
INTERNACIONAL
Dem civil war hits primary debate stage as El-Sayed and Stevens clash: ‘What are you hiding?’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The high-stakes fight between the left-wing and the center-left establishment for the future of the Democratic Party took center stage Tuesday in battleground Michigan.
That’s where moderate Rep. Haley Stevens, who is backed by Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and the party establishment, faced off in a fiery Senate nomination debate against former Wayne County Health Department Director Abdul El-Sayed, a far-left candidate endorsed by progressive champions Sen. Bernie Sanders I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
The sharpest exchanges centered on campaign money, outside spending and U.S. policy toward Israel, with El-Sayed repeatedly accusing Stevens of benefiting from millions of dollars in outside spending from pro-Israel and corporate-aligned groups.
«If you want your politics dictated by AIPAC or Chuck Schumer, then I’m not your guy,» El-Sayed said, arguing the Democratic Party would not change if it continued to elect leaders who take money from corporations. Stevens countered by accusing El-Sayed of benefiting from Republican efforts to boost him in the primary. «What my opponent needs to answer is, why is the GOP spending thousands of dollars to prop up his campaign, saying that he will make Mike Rogers the next U.S. senator?» Stevens said.
DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE CALLED FOR MASS RELEASE OF CRIMINALS DURING PRISON ABOLITION WEBINAR
Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan, right, and former Wayne County Health Department Director Abdul El-Sayed are facing off in the August 4, 2026 Democratic Senate primary in the Great Lakes battleground state. (Evan Cobb for The Washington Post via Getty Images; Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
The showdown came four weeks before Michigan’s primary, with the winner taking on former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers, who is on a glide path to the GOP nomination, in the crucial midterm battle to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters.
The rare open Senate seat is a top Republican target and is a must-hold for the Democrats as they aim to win back the Senate majority from the GOP, which currently controls the chamber with a slim 53-47 margin.
The anti-establishment El-Sayed, who has been sharply critical of Israel, blamed AIPAC’s influence in American politics and accused politicians, like Stevens, of being «bought off by AIPAC» on Tuesday night. «So long as our politicians continue to be bought off by AIPAC do not be surprised when we fight wars that are in their best interest,» El-Sayed said.
LEFT-WING ACTIVISTS HECKLE PRO-ISRAEL DEMOCRAT HALEY STEVENS AT MICHIGAN CONVENTION
Stevens, meanwhile, sought to flip El-Sayed’s attacks over outside spending back onto him, pressing the progressive candidate to release his tax returns and accusing him of being less than transparent about who was funding his own campaign and career.
«Well, look, transparency is also important, and this is why I have released my tax returns. My opponent, Abdul, he said that transparency is key, but yet he hasn’t released his tax returns,» Stevens said. «Abdoul, you talk about getting money out of politics and putting money in people’s pockets. But who is putting money in yours? What are you hiding?
Stevens, who agreed with El-Sayed on an immediate end to U.S. involvement in Iran, also drew a contrast between herself and her opponent by emphasizing her support for a two-state solution.
«The difference between my opponent and myself on this issue is that I believe in a two-state solution,» Stevens said. «I can say that Israel has a right to peacefully exist alongside the people of Palestine and in Gaza.»
An Israeli soldier takes up position on the border with the Gaza Strip in southern Israel. (AP/Tsafrir Abayov)
Immigration enforcement also became a flashpoint during the debate, with El-Sayed saying ICE needed to be abolished and accusing Stevens of shifting her tone to be more aggressive towards the agency Tuesday night than she has in the past.
Stevens responded by accusing El-Sayed of using «Republican tactics,» saying a House vote El-Sayed referenced, claiming Stevens «voted to thank ICE and increase their budget,» was a «cynical» move by the GOP to include condemnation for an antisemitic terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado alongside funding for the federal immigration agency.
FOUR MONTHS TO MIDTERMS: 12 RACES THAT WILL DETERMINE THE SENATE MAJORITY
«There was a bill on the House floor to condemn an antisemitic terrorist attack that in Boulder, Colorado, that killed an individual and injured a Holocaust survivor. Instead of bringing us together, Republicans put in a cynical point about thanking ICE,» Stevens said in response to El-Sayed’s claims she is a supporter of ICE. «I am always going to stand up to violence, and I just wish my opponent wouldn’t pursue the cynical approaches of Republicans when we do need to be united.»
On child care, Stevens pointed to expanding grants and paid family leave, while El-Sayed called for making child care «100% free» and paying for it by taxing billionaire wealth. The debate also featured a lengthy exchange on artificial intelligence and data centers. El-Sayed called for stricter federal guardrails, union labor requirements, community benefit agreements and an «FDA for AI’s,» while Stevens said data centers should be forced to pay utility and water bills, so Michigan families are not stuck with higher costs.
Tuesday night’s debate was held two days after progressive state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, once the third major Democrat in the primary, suspended her campaign.
McMorrow, who has seen her national profile expand in recent years and was running as a progressive in an ideological space between El-Sayed and Stevens, suspended her campaign amid faltering poll numbers and fundraising that weren’t keeping pace with her two main rivals.
McMorrow pledged to fully support whichever Democrat wins the primary and will ultimately face-off with Rogers, who is running for the Senate for a second straight cycle after losing in 2024 to now-Sen. Elissa Slotkin by a razor-thin margin.
DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB
Following McMorrow’s exit from the race, Stevens praised her fellow Democrat by calling her an «important voice» for policies that benefit Michigan families. Stevens, who has been backed by millions in super PAC spending, including big bucks from Israel-aligned groups, argued that she is the strongest Democratic candidate to win the primary and defeat Rogers in November.
Representative Haley Stevens, a Democrat from Michigan, listens during an interview on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2019. Stevens represents Michigan’s 11th congressional district. Photographer: Melissa Lyttle/Bloomberg via Getty Images (Melissa Lyttle/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
El-Sayed praised McMorrow for having the «courage» to challenge what he described as a rigged political system, accusing Democratic Party insiders of spending millions to influence the primary. While he did not name specific groups, his remarks appeared to reference corporate PACs and establishment party leaders such as Schumer.
El-Sayed, who, if elected, would make history as the nation’s first Muslim senator, is an epidemiologist who unsuccessfully ran for governor as an insurgent candidate in 2018. He has made support for «Medicare-for-all» a major component of his campaign.
The far-left candidate has also called for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and is a vocal critic of Israel amid its war with Hamas — even characterizing Israel’s actions in Gaza as «genocide» against Palestinians. And El-Sayed, who served as a top surrogate on Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign, has vowed not to accept PAC donations.
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
Schumer and the party establishment view Stevens as more electable than El-Sayed, who has sparked controversy with his past comments. They worry that El-Sayed as the party’s nominee would jeopardize the Democrat-controlled Senate seat by pushing the party too far to the left in a state that President Donald Trump carried two years ago by just over one percentage point.
A victory by El-Sayed over Stevens in next month’s primary would give the far left a major win on a statewide stage, and likely further boost their momentum in the battle for the Democratic Party’s future.
On Tuesday night, Stevens leaned into her congressional record, tenure in the Obama administration’s U.S. Auto Rescue Task Force, her manufacturing background, and bipartisan efforts in Congress, including work on legislation aimed at blocking Chinese cars from undercutting American automakers.
«We can build affordable cars here in Michigan without having the Chinese come in and eat our lunch. Not on my watch,» Stevens said.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
El-Sayed leaned on being a political outsider who refuses corporate and Super PAC donations, while he pointed to his UAW endorsement and argued that Democrats need to be more aggressive in confronting Wall Street and corporate influence across many areas.
«There’s a reason that the UAW has endorsed me in this race,» El-Sayed said, arguing that corporations are «a lot more interested in a quarterly bottom line than they are in the long term sustainability of manufacturing.»
bernie sanders, chuck schumer, alexandria ocasio cortez, midterm elections, democrats elections, michigan, senate elections
INTERNACIONAL
Qatar llamó a una desescalada en Medio Oriente tras la reanudación de los ataques entre Estados Unidos e Irán
Qatar condenó este miércoles los ataques perpetrados por Irán contra Kuwait y Bahréin y solicitó, por vía diplomática, evitar una escalada tras la reanudación de hostilidades originada por los ataques del régimen a petroleros en el estrecho de Ormuz.
En un comunicado difundido por el Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores a través de X, Doha remarcó que actúa como intermediario clave en las conversaciones entre Teherán y Washington y subrayó “la necesidad de evitar que la región sufra las consecuencias de estos ataques injustificados”.
Qatar también resaltó la importancia de “mantener la vía del diálogo y la diplomacia, reducir las tensiones y consolidar los avances logrados en virtud del memorando de entendimiento”.
Por su parte, el Gobierno de Kuwait, a través de su Ministerio de Exteriores, condenó este miércoles los ataques de Irán contra su territorio y expresó “su más enérgico repudio en los términos más severos” por la “repetición de las agresiones criminales de Irán”, al advertir que “se reserva el derecho de tomar todas las medidas necesarias”.
En un comunicado, Kuwait calificó los bombardeos recientes como “un socavamiento sistemático de los esfuerzos para reducir la escalada” en la región y los consideró una “flagrante violación de la soberanía kuwaití y una amenaza directa” a la seguridad del país y de sus ciudadanos y residentes.
El Ejército de Kuwait informó en X sobre la intercepción de misiles en su espacio aéreo y el registro de varias explosiones, sin precisar ubicaciones. En paralelo, el Ministerio del Interior de Baréin instó a la población a mantener la calma y buscar refugio tras la activación de las sirenas de emergencia, según mensajes difundidos en redes sociales durante la madrugada.
La Guardia Revolucionaria iraní reivindicó este miércoles 85 ataques contra bases estadounidenses en países del golfo Pérsico, horas después de que Washington lanzara una ofensiva contra la República Islámica por los ataques iraníes a embarcaciones en el estrecho de Ormuz. Medios iraníes reportaron que los ataques se dirigieron a la base de la Quinta Flota estadounidense en Baréin y la base aérea Ali Al-Salem en Kuwait, como “respuesta inicial” a lo que denominaron “violación clara” del alto el fuego pactado con Estados Unidos hace tres semanas.
Por su parte, el régimen aseguró que la ofensiva estadounidenses contra su territorio, la revocación de la autorización para vender petróleo y “la violación de los acuerdos” sobre el estrecho de Ormuz “dejaron sin efecto partes clave y fundamentales” del memorando firmado con Washington para poner fin a la guerra.
En un comunicado, el Ministerio de Exteriores iraní denunció: “Los repetidos ataques ilegales contra Irán, junto con la decisión tomada anoche por el Tesoro de EE.UU. de revocar la licencia para la venta de petróleo iraní, la violación de los acuerdos iraníes en el estrecho de Ormuz y las continuas agresiones militares y actos terroristas del régimen sionista contra el Líbano han dejado sin efecto partes clave y fundamentales del acuerdo de cese de la guerra”.
La diplomacia iraní responsabilizó a Estados Unidos de la nueva escalada. “La responsabilidad de las peligrosas consecuencias de esta escalada recae en el renegado régimen estadounidense”, señaló.
El Ministerio consideró que los ataques lanzados por Estados Unidos durante la madrugada “contra varios centros de control y vigilancia situados en la costa sur de Irán” constituyen una “flagrante violación” del primer artículo del memorando de entendimiento firmado el 17 de junio para poner fin al conflicto.
Al mismo tiempo, Teherán advirtió que sus Fuerzas Armadas “no dudarán y también atacarán la fuente y el origen de las agresiones”.
Irán denunció que la ofensiva estadounidense dejó varios heridos en el sur del país, tras los ataques contra más de 80 objetivos de la República Islámica. En las últimas semanas, las tensiones entre Washington y Teherán se intensificaron, con ataques iraníes a buques y bombardeos estadounidenses a objetivos militares en la costa sur de Irán, en un pulso por el control del estrecho de Ormuz, vía fundamental para el comercio global de energías fósiles.
(Con información de AFP y EFE)
Middle East,Civil Unrest,TUBAS
El Mundial y la semana corta mantienen a la Cámara de Diputados en “stand by” mientras resuelve el Senado
El impacto de los cambios que se aprobaron en el Congreso
Un fanático se tatuó el quite de Paredes ante Egipto: la reacción del jugador de la Selección
El Gobierno asegura que un buque de guerra británico navegó por aguas argentinas sin permiso y evalúa presentar un reclamo diplomático
Pokémon y McDonald’s confirman nueva colaboración en Japón y los fans esperan que no se forme el mismo caos que en anteriores ocasiones – Nintenderos
ANSES: quiénes cobran hoy, miércoles 8 de julio de 2026
La producción textil aceleró su caída y la capacidad instalada siguió entre las más bajas de la industria
Portugal vs España: formaciones, hora y dónde ver por tv
Fin al presidente antisistema: Milei ya tiene su “casta” y se aferra al dogma económico
Ojo con las multas de tránsito: las más caras llegan a $3.8 millones
ECONOMIA2 días agoLa producción textil aceleró su caída y la capacidad instalada siguió entre las más bajas de la industria
- DEPORTE2 días ago
Portugal vs España: formaciones, hora y dónde ver por tv
- POLITICA3 días ago
Fin al presidente antisistema: Milei ya tiene su “casta” y se aferra al dogma económico
