Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Cops could be forced into race-based guessing game after Supreme Court move, Thomas joins dissent

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas on Monday dissented from the Supreme Court’s refusal to take up a case that they said forces police officers to create a separate set of rules for racial minorities.

Advertisement

«It is dangerous to allow an individual to be treated differently based on statistics, studies, or expert testimony that purports to show that members of the racial or ethnic group to which he belongs are more likely to act in a certain way than are members of other groups,» Alito wrote on behalf of himself and Thomas. «Here, the special treatment helped the individual; in other situations it will not.»

The case, U.S. v. Donte J. Carter, involved a Black man whose firearm and theft convictions were vacated after the D.C. Court of Appeals held that police seized him before they had reasonable suspicion. Officers later recovered a .40-caliber pistol from Carter’s pants and the government said the gun had been stolen from an FBI agent’s vehicle.

According to the D.C. court, «black Americans like [Carter] are ‘especially distrustful of law enforcement’» and therefore «‘less likely’ than other people ‘to terminate a police encounter’ due to skepticism that any attempt to exercise their constitutional rights will be respected.» 

Advertisement

SUPREME COURT REJECTS BOSTON PARENTS’ APPEAL CLAIMING RACIAL BIAS IN AN ADMISSIONS POLICY

Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are pictured together. (Getty Images)

The D.C. court reasoned that Carter’s race was relevant to whether a reasonable person in his position would have felt free to end the police encounter. It ruled that the encounter effectively became a seizure, and that such an action was unlawful because police officers hadn’t established reasonable suspicion before subjecting him to it.

Advertisement

Alito and Thomas argued that the D.C. ruling effectively forces law enforcement to treat people differently based on their race, something precedent established by the Supreme Court prohibits.

«Under the test, officers will need to quickly assess a person’s race, and if officers and courts must craft special rules for black persons, what about dark-skinned Latinos, other Latinos, and members of other minority groups?» Alito continued. «We have said that our ’Constitution is color-blind.’ It ‘almost never’ allows government actors to treat persons differently based on their race.»

SUPREME COURT RULES ON KEY VOTING RIGHTS ACT RULE AS REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS WAGE REDISTRICTING WAR

Advertisement
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas seated in the Oval Office at the White House

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas appears before swearing in Pam Bondi as U.S. Attorney General in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 5, 2025. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

To support his claims, Alito cited Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Louisiana v. Callais and Shaw v. Reno. 

«And we have rejected the proposition that the Constitution permits an individual to be treated differently based on a ‘perception that members of the same racial group — regardless of their age, education, economic status, or the community in which they live — think alike,’» Alito wrote, citing Shaw v. Reno.

This appears to be a direct challenge to the D.C. Court of Appeals, which lawyers representing the United States argued forced police officers to assume that all black people have the same attitudes toward police officers and would therefore feel uncomfortable exercising constitutional rights in their presence.

Advertisement

TRUMP’S FIRING POWER FACES TWIN SUPREME COURT TESTS, BUT ONE AGENCY MAY GET SPECIAL TREATMENT

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito standing inside the Supreme Court building.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito are seen inside the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., in December 2023. (Jacquelyn Martin-Pool/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Carter, the individual Alito noted was helped by the case, initially lied to officers by answering in the negative when approached and asked if he was carrying a weapon.

Advertisement

The police then asked Carter to pull his pants up, at which point they noticed an L-shaped bulge which was later identified as a .40-caliber pistol that had been stolen from a federal agent’s vehicle.

supreme court, second amendment, police and law enforcement, constitution, fbi

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

El Partido de los Trabajadores proclamó a Lula como candidato para un cuarto mandato en Brasil

Published

on


La convención del PT selló la reedición de la alianza con el moderado Alckmin como candidato a la vicepresidencia.

El Partido de los Trabajadores (PT) de Brasil oficializó este domingo la candidatura del mandatario Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva para las elecciones presidenciales de octubre, en las que buscará un histórico cuarto mandato no consecutivo con la mayoría de las encuestas a su favor.

Advertisement

“Quiero decir para toda la militancia de los partidos que están aquí: homologamos, oficializamos ahora. Lula, presidente; Geraldo Alckmin, vice», dijo el presidente del PT, Edinho Silva, en una entrevista previa a la ceremonia, celebrada en el centro de convenciones Expo Center Norte, en São Paulo, el mayor colegio electoral del país.

El evento, que comenzó puntual a las 10:00 hora local (13:00 GMT), selló la reedición de la alianza con el moderado Alckmin como candidato a la vicepresidencia, ante cientos de militantes, ministros y dirigentes del bloque oficialista.

A sus 80 años, Lula encara su séptima carrera a la Jefatura de Estado, tras haber gobernado entre 2003 y 2010 y regresar al poder en 2023.

Advertisement

Tengo la misma energía de cuando tenía 30 años”, ha reiterado el veterano líder sindical para disipar dudas sobre su salud.

La “soberanía” como bandera frente a Trump

Fotografía del 29 de julio de 2026 del presidente de Brasil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, (c-i) junto al vicepresidente, Geraldo Alckmin (c-d) en la convención de referéndum del Partido Socialista Brasileño (PSB), en el Centro de Convenciones Brasil21, en Brasilia (Brasil). EFE/ Andre Borges
Fotografía del 29 de julio de 2026 del presidente de Brasil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, (c-i) junto al vicepresidente, Geraldo Alckmin (c-d) en la convención de referéndum del Partido Socialista Brasileño (PSB), en el Centro de Convenciones Brasil21, en Brasilia (Brasil). EFE/ Andre Borges

La campaña se abre bajo la sombra de Donald Trump, aliado de la familia Bolsonaro y que ha respaldado a varios candidatos en América Latina. “En Brasil no aceptamos que nadie meta la nariz donde no lo llaman”, advirtió Lula la semana pasada.

Estados Unidos impuso en julio dos rondas de aranceles a productos brasileños, tras acusar al país de prácticas comerciales desleales. Alentado por Eduardo Bolsonaro, hijo del ex presidente, Washington ya había aplicado gravámenes similares en 2025 —luego suspendidos en buena parte— en represalia por el juicio contra Jair Bolsonaro. Ante la nueva presión, Lula prometió una «guerra de la verdad contra la mentira» frente a su par estadounidense y acusó a Flávio Bolsonaro de ser un “traidor a la patria” por, según él, alentar el castigo económico a Brasil.

“La narrativa sobre la soberanía le calza como un guante a Lula: en un momento de caída de su popularidad, logra identificar a un enemigo allá afuera”, dijo a la agencia AFP el politólogo Leonardo Paz, de la Fundación Getúlio Vargas.

Advertisement

El clima bilateral sigue deteriorándose: la semana pasada Brasilia negó las visas a dos funcionarios estadounidenses que pretendían viajar al país para hablar de “integridad electoral”.

FOTO DE ARCHIVO: Una vista aérea tomada con un dron muestra el edificio de la sede del Banco Central en Brasilia, Brasil, el 26 de diciembre de 2024. REUTERS/Ueslei Marcelino/File Photo
FOTO DE ARCHIVO: Una vista aérea tomada con un dron muestra el edificio de la sede del Banco Central en Brasilia, Brasil, el 26 de diciembre de 2024. REUTERS/Ueslei Marcelino/File Photo

Lula defiende los avances de su gestión en la caída del desempleo y la reducción de la pobreza, en un contexto de desaceleración económica, con un crecimiento del PIB en torno al 2 % para este año electoral, tras el 3,4 % de 2024 y el 2,3 % de 2025.

La presión inflacionaria —marcada por factores internos y por el alza de precios de alimentos y combustible en el contexto geopolítico— mantiene la tasa básica de interés en 14,25 %, junto a un déficit nominal cercano al 10 % del PIB y una deuda pública que superó el 80 %. Son puntos que la oposición busca explotar, junto con la lucha contra el crimen organizado, que controla barrios populares donde viven millones de personas.

La corrupción también pesa sobre ambos candidatos. Esta semana, un juez de la Corte Suprema autorizó dos investigaciones por tráfico de influencias contra el hijo mayor de Lula, Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, conocido como “Lulinha”, por presuntas gestiones ante el Ministerio de Salud. Del lado opositor, Flávio Bolsonaro enfrenta cuestionamientos por el financiamiento de una película sobre su padre, para la cual habría pedido dinero a un banquero acusado de una megaestafa.

Advertisement
FOTO DE ARCHIVO: El senador brasileño Flavio Bolsonaro habla durante un evento en São Paulo, Brasil, el 18 de junio de 2026. REUTERS/Alexandre Meneghini/File Photo
FOTO DE ARCHIVO: El senador brasileño Flavio Bolsonaro habla durante un evento en São Paulo, Brasil, el 18 de junio de 2026. REUTERS/Alexandre Meneghini/File Photo

Los comicios de octubre se perfilan como una nueva disputa polarizada entre el progresismo de Lula y la extrema derecha que encarna Flávio Bolsonaro, de 45 años, oficializado la semana pasada como heredero político del espacio conservador. Su padre, Jair Bolsonaro, está inhabilitado, condenado a 27 años de prisión domiciliaria por intento de golpe de Estado, tras perder las elecciones de 2022 ante Lula.

Según la última encuesta de Datafolha, Lula obtendría un 48 % de la intención de voto en un eventual balotaje, frente al 43 % de Flávio Bolsonaro — una diferencia estrecha, similar a la de la ajustada campaña de 2022.

(Con información de EFE y AFP)



South America / Central America

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Satellite images show evidence of oil leak spreading from sanctioned vessel near Oman

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A sanctioned tanker loaded with crude is leaving a growing trail of oil in protected waters off the coast of Oman, according to newly reviewed satellite images, as experts warn the stranded vessel could break apart during the region’s rough monsoon season.

Advertisement

Satellite images reviewed by The Associated Press show an oil sheen covering roughly 20 square kilometers, or about 8 square miles, around Dhofar’s Qibliyah Island, part of Oman’s protected Hallaniyat Islands. Dark patches of crude have also reached the shoreline. Experts say the leak has worsened in recent days, fueling fears that rough weather could trigger a much larger spill.

«The last few days, the imagery indicates an increase in oil coming out, as the size of the sheen is growing,» Wim Zwijnenburg, an environmental expert with the Dutch peace organization PAX, told the AP.

REPORT WARNS RUSSIA USING SHADOW FLEET TO PROBE NATO DRONE DEFENSES

Advertisement

This satellite image from Planet Labs PBC shows crude oil leaking and spreading from the sanctioned Suezmax tanker Caroline Bezengi grounded off the coast of Oman, on Friday, July 31, 2026. (Planet Labs PBC via AP)

He said the biggest risk is that the vessel could break apart as strong winds and rough seas during the annual monsoon season continue to pound the ship’s hull.

The 899-foot, Cameroon-flagged Caroline Bezengi has been stranded off Oman’s southern coast since June after its crew reported an onboard explosion, according to maritime news outlets. Reuters, citing maritime security sources, reported the vessel first ran into trouble on June 8 near the Yemeni port of Mukalla, where initial assessments suggested a blast may have occurred. The cause has not been confirmed.

Advertisement
Crude oil spreads from the grounded tanker Caroline Bezengi near Qibliyah Island, Oman.

This satellite image from Planet Labs PBC shows crude oil leaking and spreading from the sanctioned Suezmax tanker Caroline Bezengi grounded at Qibliyah Island, off the coast of Oman, on Friday, July 31, 2026. (Planet Labs PBC via AP)

Ship-tracking data reviewed by Reuters showed the tanker had loaded Russian crude at the Black Sea port of Novorossiysk before its latest voyage. The vessel has been sanctioned by the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada and Switzerland for allegedly transporting Russian oil as part of Moscow’s so-called «shadow fleet» — a network of aging tankers used to bypass Western sanctions imposed after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

HUNDREDS OF RUSSIAN SHADOW TANKERS TRIGGER MILITARY ALARM TRANSITING NATO WATERS: REPORT

Zwijnenburg estimated the tanker is carrying more than 800,000 barrels of crude oil and said recent imagery suggests at least one section of the hull has been breached. Other maritime specialists who reviewed the images told Reuters the vessel also appears to be listing, adding to concerns that it could eventually break apart.

Advertisement
Satellite image shows oil slick beside the Caroline Bezengi vessel off Oman coast.

A satellite image shows an oil slick next to the Caroline Bezengi, a sanctioned vessel off the coast of the Dhofar Governorate, Oman, July 28, 2026. (Planet Labs PBC/Handout via REUTERS)

The spill threatens a protected marine reserve in the Arabian Sea that is home to endangered petrels and other rare wildlife. Greenpeace Germany warned that oil has already polluted stretches of coastline and damaged the area’s fragile ecosystem.

«With oil apparently continuing to leak and the tanker stranded in a difficult location, there is a serious risk of a much larger oil disaster, with even more devastating consequences for the region’s coastlines and marine ecosystems,» Greenpeace Germany’s Nina Noelle told the AP.

The U.N.’s International Maritime Organization said earlier this week it is monitoring the situation, adding that while the vessel has not broken apart, authorities are continuing to assess the safety and environmental risks.

Advertisement

Oman’s Ministry of Transport, Communications and Information Technology ordered the vessel’s owners to remove the ship and its cargo by July 23. It is unclear whether that deadline was met or whether the owners have responded.



middle east, environment world, oceans, world, environmental disasters

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump demand puts vulnerable Republicans in impossible spot ahead of midterms

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Republicans are sounding the alarm that President Donald Trump’s demand to cancel August recess could cost the GOP seats in the midterms.

Advertisement

As the upcoming jailbreak from Washington, D.C., fast approaches, Trump’s most-prized legislative push remains stalled. He wants Republicans to stay put until it’s finished, but the political reality says otherwise.

And it comes as Republicans are desperate to get out of the Beltway and sell their accomplishments, rather than their shortcomings, to voters on the campaign trail. The GOP has more to lose than Democrats this cycle, too, with three vulnerable incumbents and a handful of others on the periphery.

REPUBLICAN SAYS TRUMP’S TOP ELECTION PRIORITY ‘DEAD’ IN SENATE AS GOP FRACTURES AHEAD OF MIDTERMS

Advertisement

President Donald Trump announces the Freedom Haulers initiative on West Executive Avenue in Washington, D.C., on July 30, 2026. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

«Canceling August recess, where we have to have our members out campaigning and connecting with their voters, and people not understanding that, is about as tone-deaf as telling everybody to stay home in 2020 when we lost [Kelly] Loefler and [David] Purdue,» Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told Fox News Digital.

«It’s the same sort of thought process,» he continued. «It’s thinking that one branch runs this country and it doesn’t. If we don’t keep majorities, people are gonna regret it.»

Advertisement

Several of Tillis’ colleagues, however, disagree, and want the Senate to stay put until the SAVE America Act passes, be it through the party-line budget reconciliation process or by nuking the filibuster.

GOP RIFT GROWS AS THUNE HITS BRAKES ON TRUMP’S ELECTION BILL TO AVERT SHUTDOWN

Trump’s pressure, the online zeitgeist and the political hot potato of the situation have put incumbents in a tough spot: go home and admit defeat, or stay put and push legislation that so far has not gone anywhere.

Advertisement

For many Republicans, they openly acknowledge that it’s a math problem in the Senate — the GOP does not have the votes to pass the SAVE America Act. Some argue that keeping the Senate in town likely wouldn’t change the minds of those who oppose it.

«If it would make a difference in the outcome, I’m fine with that, but it won’t make a difference, which I don’t believe it will, that it’s an act of futility,» Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital.

TRUMP UNLOADS ON CORNYN, TIES AG NOMINATION FIGHT TO BITTER TEXAS PRIMARY

Advertisement
cornyn todd blanche trump

Republican Sens. John Cornyn and Thom Tillis are obstructing President Donald Trump’s attorney general nominee Todd Blanche. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images; Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

Both Cornyn and Tillis are retiring — Tillis opted to get out during the tumultuous period that was passing the «big, beautiful bill,» and Cornyn was kneecapped by Trump, who backed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over him in a grueling primary battle.

But Cornyn noted that if he was still running for office, he might have a change of heart.

«I don’t know how that would come out, but if I was running for reelection, I would vote to stay,» he said.

Advertisement

Cornyn’s point is the line that some vulnerable Republicans are toeing. Two Republicans running in tight races, Sens. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, told Fox News Digital that they have been voraciously pushing for the SAVE America Act.

But, Sullivan said that he didn’t want to comment on the president’s push to cancel recess, while Husted said it was always preferable to be back in Ohio with his constituents.

«But I also have a job here, and if the job requires me to be here, then I’ll be here,» he said.

Advertisement

Others in less tight races who support the legislation still understand the reality in the upper chamber: without changing the minds of a cohort of Republicans who have voted against it and flipping several Democrats, the SAVE America Act is going nowhere.

«I think to cancel the whole recess would be a problem, but I think to keep us up here another week or 10 days, certainly, I’m willing to do it. I’d stay here till November if I thought it would change things,» Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., told Fox News Digital.

But he acknowledged that coming home empty-handed was a problem, too.

Advertisement

«The base would be mad if we don’t make the best effort possible to get this voter ID across the finish line,» Marshall said.

politics, senate elections, republicans, midterm elections, congress

Continue Reading

Tendencias

Copyright © 2026 NDM - Noticias del Momento | #Noticias #Chimentos #Política #Fútbol #Economía #Sociedad