Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Court sentences former world leader to 7 years in prison for resisting arrest, other charges

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — A South Korean appeals court on Wednesday sentenced ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol to seven years in prison for resisting arrest and bypassing a legitimate Cabinet meeting before his brief imposition of martial law in December 2024.

Advertisement

The conviction for obstruction of justice and other charges comes on top of a life sentence he has already received on rebellion charges stemming from his baffling authoritarian push, which triggered the most serious crisis for the country’s democracy in decades.

Judge Yoon Sung-sik of the Seoul High Court said the conservative former president sidestepped a legally mandated full Cabinet meeting before declaring martial law, falsified documents to conceal the lapse, and deployed security officials «like a private army» to resist law enforcement efforts to arrest him in the weeks following his impeachment. Former President Yoon stood quietly as the verdict was delivered and made no comment.

SOUTH KOREAN COURT RULES EX‑PRESIDENT YOON SUK YEOL GUILTY IN INSURRECTION TRIAL

Advertisement

A supporter of former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol holds up his portrait during a rally outside Seoul High Court in Seoul, South Korea, on April 29, 2026. (Ahn Young-joon/AP)

Yoo Jeong-hwa, one of Yoon’s lawyers, called the verdict «very disappointing» and said the legal team would appeal to the Supreme Court. Yoon has also appealed his life sentence.

A lower court in January sentenced Yoon to five years in prison but partially cleared him of abuse-of-power charges tied to the Cabinet meeting ahead of the martial law declaration, finding he was not responsible for the failure to attend of two members who were invited.

Advertisement

The Seoul High Court reversed that acquittal, finding him guilty on all counts and ruling that he violated the rights of those two as well as seven other Cabinet members who weren’t notified by convening only a select few to simulate a formal meeting.

SOUTH KOREAN PROSECUTOR SEEKS DEATH PENALTY FOR EX-PRESIDENT YOON OVER MARTIAL LAW DECLARATION: ‘SELF-COUP’

South Korea's impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol attending impeachment trial hearing in Seoul

South Korea’s impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol attends a hearing of his impeachment trial at the Constitutional Court in Seoul on Feb. 11, 2025. (Lee Jin-man/AP)

Though brief, Yoon’s Dec. 3, 2024, martial law decree threw the country into a severe political crisis, paralyzing politics and high-level diplomacy and rattling financial markets. The turmoil eased only after his liberal rival, Lee Jae Myung, won an early presidential election in June.

Advertisement

Yoon was suspended from office on Dec. 14, 2024, after being impeached by the liberal-led legislature and was formally removed by the Constitutional Court in April 2025.

Following his suspension from office, he refused to comply with a Seoul court’s warrant to detain him for questioning, setting up a standoff in which dozens of investigators arrived at the presidential residence in early January 2025 but were blocked by presidential security forces and vehicle barricades. He was detained later that month, released by another court in March, and was then re-arrested in July.

Supporters of former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol rally outside Seoul High Court

Supporters of former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol stage a rally outside the Seoul High Court in Seoul, South Korea, on April 29, 2026. (Ahn Young-joon/AP)

He remained in custody after that as a series of criminal trials, which are continuing, began.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Wednesday’s ruling came a day after the same court increased to four years the sentence of Yoon’s wife, Kim Keon Hee, for charges including accepting luxury gifts from the Unification Church, which sought political favors from Yoon’s government, and involvement in a stock price manipulation scheme.

Supporters of former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol rally outside Seoul High Court

Supporters of former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol stage a rally outside the Seoul High Court in Seoul on April 29, 2026. (Ahn Young-joon/AP)

Prosecutors in a separate trial last week also requested a 30-year prison term for Yoon over allegations that he deliberately tried to escalate tensions with North Korea in 2024 by ordering drone flights over Pyongyang as he sought to create justifiable conditions for martial law at home.

Advertisement



south korea, asia world regions, world

INTERNACIONAL

Mamdani-linked Platner adviser’s history with nude photos surfaces ahead of crucial Senate primary

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Democratic Party campaign strategist who recently went viral for doing damage control for Graham Platner amid his public sexting scandals has past writings that include comments about sending and receiving «nudes» and a footnote in a puberty guide for boys that he wrote, which referenced using images of his own penis.

Advertisement

Morris Katz, an up-and-coming New York City Democratic Party campaign strategist credited with being a major factor in New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s electoral upset last year, wrote on the Medium blogging platform in 2019, amid a separate Democratic Party sexting scandal, that he had both «sent» and «received nudes.» Katz also authored a 2020 puberty guide for boys that included, on page 17, a footnote saying that he initially considered using «images of my penis» to illustrate puberty before the publisher said it was inappropriate.

The resurfaced writings have drawn scrutiny over the last week from Maine Republicans after Katz was accused of trying to contain the fallout from the sexting scandal involving Platner that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women early in his marriage on Kik, an anonymous messaging app that has faced scrutiny over predatory behavior and child-safety concerns.

HOW MUCH BAGGAGE WILL DEMOCRATS ACCEPT FROM MAINE’S GRAHAM PLATNER?

Advertisement

The irony has not gone unnoticed by Republicans in Maine, who argue Katz’s past writings add another bizarre layer to a Platner campaign already struggling to move past allegations involving numerous scandals revolving around the candidate’s judgment.

Morris Katz, 27, has been widely credited with helping New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani complete his upset victory last year against Andrew Cuomo and Curtis Sliwa. (Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Jason Savage, executive director of the Maine Republican Party, told Fox News Digital that the combination of Platner and Katz is «like a sort of weird horror story,» arguing that both men appear unable to recognize «the guardrails of decency.»

Advertisement

«Morris Katz thinking that he was going to call up and intimidate Genevieve McDonald shows how bad his judgement is — he was never going to succeed at that and the fact he didn’t have the instincts to know better is just the first red flag of many for him,» Savage told Fox News Digital. «The combination of Morris Katz and Graham Platner is this weird horror story where neither one of them really understands the guardrails on decency. Neither one of them can recognize when there is a boundary.»

A Republican strategist, who is from rural Maine but wanted to remain anonymous when speaking to Fox News Digital, said the Katz controversy shows national progressive operatives are using Maine as a testing ground for an outsider-backed campaign that could ultimately weaken the seniority and resources incumbent Republican Senator Susan Collins has delivered to struggling communities across the state.

‘MAINE’S MAMDANI’: MAINE GOP CHIEF ISSUES WARNING ABOUT NEW CHALLENGER LOOKING TO OUST SUSAN COLLINS

Advertisement

«This guy [Katz], who is unbelievably strange, comes in from out of state and tries to get this horribly flawed guy, like limping, pleading across the finish line. That is so arrogant,» the GOP strategist said. «The arrogance that it takes to come in and say, ‘I’m an out-of-state progressive socialist here to make some money off a flawed candidate bleeding in the polls,’ and then try to take that away from the people who really need it, you’re going to take away what Susan Collins has done and will be able to do for these people.»

Susan Collins and Graham Platner split

Susan Collins (left) and Graham Platner (right). (Graeme Sloan/Getty Images ; Sophie Park/Getty Images)

Platner’s campaign has been dogged by controversies since he emerged as a progressive challenger in Maine’s closely watched Senate race against incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins.

Some of the most recent firestorms have centered on reports alleging Platner was abusive to an ex-girlfriend and that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women early in his marriage on the platform Kik. Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, reportedly disclosed the messages to campaign officials during an internal vetting process, and the campaign has acknowledged the messages existed while arguing the matter was addressed privately between Platner and his wife.

Advertisement

SENATE CANDIDATE GRAHAM PLATNER SENT EXPLICIT TEXTS TO MULTIPLE WOMEN WHILE MARRIED, WIFE SAYS: REPORT

The controversy intensified after reports that Platner still had an active profile on Kik, an anonymous messaging app that has faced criticism from child-safety groups and law enforcement officials. The profile reportedly featured a shirtless mirror selfie of Platner with a towel around his waist, which Republican staffers later appeared to mock outside the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee by showing up in towels.

NRSC staffers protest Platner

Republican staffers, including National Republican Senatorial Committee staffers, protest outside the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., wearing towels to mock Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner’s reported Kik profile photo. (Nicholas Ballasy/Fox News Digital)

Platner had already faced scrutiny over a tattoo that critics identified as a Nazi-linked symbol, which he later covered up. Platner has said he was unaware of the symbol’s association with Nazis when he got the tattoo years ago, although McDonald has contested he has been aware of its meaning for some time.

Advertisement

Platner also apologized after old Reddit posts resurfaced in which he made a series of inflammatory comments about rape, race, political violence, police, rural Americans and military veterans. Platner has said his views have changed and that some of his past comments reflected a darker period in his life after military service.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

More recently, Platner denied allegations from a former girlfriend who accused him of abusive behavior, calling the claims politically motivated. His campaign has accused critics and national media outlets of focusing on private matters and personal attacks rather than the issues affecting Maine voters.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to Katz, the Platner campaign, Fight Agency, Mamdani’s team and McDonald for comment.

sex crimes, fund raising, zohran mamdani, republicans, campaigning

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

El caso Lyhanna: Francia cuestiona la justicia tras el asesinato de una niña de 11 años y las fallas en la investigación de su presunto asesino

Published

on


El caso de pedofilia y asesinato de Lyhanna, que había cumplido 11 años, con el padre de una de sus amigas como principal sospechoso, conmueve a Francia e interpela la lentitud y eficacia de la justicia francesa. Los magistrados y fiscales no se movilizaron con rapidez ni interés en el caso, ni declararon la alerta inmediata.

Tras una marcha silenciosa, que congregó el domingo a 6.000 personas en Fleurance, Gers, para rendir homenaje a Lyhanna —cuyo cuerpo fue identificado en un silo agrícola donde trabajaba el asesino—, el ministro de Justicia, Gérald Darmanin, se dirigió a los procuradores.

Advertisement

Pidió a los fiscales, reunidos el lunes por la mañana en el Ministerio de Justicia, «una revisión de las denuncias de menores víctimas de violencia sexual antes de mediados de julio», priorizando los casos en los que las víctimas son menores de edad.

La justicia cuestionada

Tras este «terrible fracaso», Darmanin hizo un llamamiento a la movilización general. Explicó en conferencia de prensa que había pedido a los magistrados que «reconocieran las deficiencias, cuando existieran».

Advertisement

Desde el hallazgo del cuerpo de la niña de 11 años y la revelación de las acusaciones de violación contra el sospechoso, el ministro de Justicia ha denunciado reiteradamente las «inaceptables» disfunciones del sistema judicial. Asociaciones feministas y de protección infantil también convocaron manifestaciones frente a los juzgados el lunes.

Jérôme Barella, el sospechoso de haberla asesinado, ya tenía casos por violación a menores que no habían sido investigados.

El hermano también está detenido

Advertisement

El hermano de Jérôme Barella se encuentra bajo custodia policial, sospechoso de violar a su expareja.

El minisro de Justicia francés, Gerald Darmanin. Foto: Reuters

«La información que recibo me lleva a creer que ha habido un grave fallo en el sistema de justicia pública», afirmó el ministro Gérald Darmanin. «Diré toda la verdad, sin ocultar nada al pueblo francés», aseguró y anunció que no renunciará a su cargo de ministro.

Tensiones políticas y judiciales

La ley Darmanin sobre justicia penal está impactada por el caso Lyhanna. En enero, en una entrevista con Le Figaro, Gérald Darmanin prometió que su plan de justicia penal «reduciría a la mitad la acumulación de casos».

Advertisement

Menos de seis meses después, esta legislación, destinada a aliviar la carga de los tribunales, adquiere una resonancia particularmente significativa con el asesinato de Lyhanna, que ha puesto de manifiesto las disfunciones de un sistema judicial sobrecargado en Francia.

El proyecto de ley sobre justicia penal y respeto a las víctimas llega a comisión en la Asamblea Nacional este lunes. Presionado por el caso Lyhanna —el viernes ofreció sus «disculpas en nombre de la justicia»—, el ministro de Justicia tendrá la difícil tarea de convencer a los parlamentarios para que voten a favor de su proyecto de ley, que ha provocado una gran indignación entre los abogados.

Esta es la primera parte de la denominada ley «SURE» (sanciones útiles, rápidas y efectivas).

Advertisement

La lucha contra la violencia sexual

La lucha contra la violencia sexual y de género, para la cual cerca de cien parlamentarios de todo el espectro político presentaron un proyecto de ley marco a finales de 2025 —y que el caso Lyhanna ha reavivado—, debe ser una «tarea de gran envergadura», según la Fundación de Mujeres.

'En memoria de Lyhanna', reza la remera de una mujer durante la marcha en Fleurance. Foto: EFE

«Ya no queremos medidas a medias, leyes aprobadas con prisas ni soluciones provisionales. Hemos aceptado esto durante demasiado tiempo en los últimos diez años, en los que hemos denunciado la violencia contra las mujeres y los niños: lo que necesitamos es una tarea de gran envergadura, una reforma integral», declaró Anne-Cécile Mailfert, presidenta de la asociación, el lunes.

El proyecto de ley número 2169, impulsado por la diputada socialista Céline Thiébaut-Martinez, de Seine-et-Marne, y basado en 140 recomendaciones de organizaciones feministas —»con el objetivo de combatir de forma integral la violencia sexista y sexual contra las mujeres y los niños»—, se presentó el 2 de diciembre de 2025. Consta de 79 artículos.

Advertisement

El caso de Lyhanna, la estudiante de secundaria de 11 años hallada muerta el viernes en la región de Gers, ha reavivado el debate.

Magistrados furiosos

Un sindicato de magistrados denunció ataques «inaceptables» y cuestionó al ministro Darmanin. Es «inaceptable» que los magistrados «sean señalados y objeto de escarnio público y amenazas», antes de que se conozcan los resultados de la investigación administrativa iniciada tras la desaparición de Lyhanna, declaró el lunes el presidente del Sindicato de Magistrados (USM), en una inusual carta dirigida al ministro de Justicia.

Advertisement

«La muerte de una niña es una tragedia absoluta. Debemos a las familias y a la ciudadanía transparencia respecto a las circunstancias estructurales y fácticas que contribuyeron a ella», escribió Ludovic Friat a Gérald Darmanin, cuya «responsabilidad política», según él, «sigue siendo completa».

El presidente del USM, el sindicato mayoritario de magistrados, acusó al ministro de Justicia de haber «designado ya a los responsables y anunciado sanciones disciplinarias» antes del inicio de la investigación de la Inspección General de Justicia, una «presión deliberada» ejercida sobre él.

Gérald Darmanin señaló la «lentitud» y la «falta de priorización». «En el caso específico de Lyhanna, no se trata de una cuestión de recursos», afirmó. «No es la falta de recursos lo que impidió tomar decisiones en este caso concreto. La fiscalía de Auch recibió recursos adicionales el pasado septiembre. Además, el proceso es lento. Se trata más bien de esta lentitud y la falta de priorización», añadió. «La información que recibo me lleva a creer que ha habido un grave fallo en el sistema de justicia pública», declaró.

Advertisement

Un pedófilo nunca investigado

Jérôme Barella, principal sospechoso del asesinato de Lyhanna, es objeto de al menos seis denuncias y dos informes.

¿Cuántas víctimas potenciales? Antes del asesinato de Lyhanna, por el que fue acusado de secuestro y detención ilegal, Jérôme Barella era objeto de varias denuncias por violación y agresión sexual a menores, las cuales fueron desestimadas o por las que nunca fue interrogado.

Advertisement

La revelación de denuncias anteriores a la desaparición de la niña desató una controversia nacional sobre las deficiencias del sistema judicial. Este hombre de 40 años, trabajador temporal y exempleado polivalente en escuelas, es objeto de seis denuncias, dos informes y un procedimiento disciplinario.

El primer caso conocido en su contra data de diciembre de 2017. En ese momento, la madre de una estudiante de secundaria de 17 años, que asistía a la escuela donde Jérôme Barella trabajaba como personal de mantenimiento, presentó una denuncia. Esta madre denunció una relación entre su hija menor de edad y este hombre, que tenía 32 años en ese entonces. El caso se cerró dos meses después, en febrero de 2018, luego de que la joven asegurara a los investigadores que la relación había sido consensuada.

Entre 2018 y 2021, Jérôme Barella fue contratado como personal de mantenimiento en varios institutos del departamento de Gers. En 2020, mientras trabajaba en el instituto Maréchal-Lannes de Lectoure, fue objeto de un procedimiento disciplinario, «tras una denuncia por comportamiento inapropiado hacia una alumna», según la región de Occitania. Su despido se anunció en 2021.

Advertisement

En enero de 2022, la fiscalía de Béthune, en el distrito de Pas-de-Calais, abrió un procedimiento contra Jérôme Barella tras una denuncia por «violación de una menor de 15 años». Esta denuncia se refería a presuntos actos cometidos en 2020 contra una niña de 7 años, en el domicilio del acusado, en Montestruc-sur-Gers. Sin embargo, en mayo de 2024, el caso fue desestimado por «falta de pruebas suficientes». Este miércoles, Clémence Meyer, fiscal de Auch, indicó que la denuncia será «reexaminada a la luz de nuevas pruebas».

En el verano de 2025, la fiscalía de Toulouse abrió un tercer caso contra Jérôme Barella, tras la denuncia presentada por los padres de una niña, nacida en 2021. La víctima, amiga de la hija del acusado, denunció violaciones cometidas «entre septiembre de 2024 y mayo de 2025 en el domicilio» del hombre en Montestruc-sur-Gers.

Esta denuncia por «violación de una menor de 15 años» se registró el 22 de agosto de 2025 en la comisaría de gendarmería de Plaisance-du-Touch, Haute-Garonne, donde se habían mudado los padres de la víctima. Según la fiscalía de Toulouse, la niña fue entrevistada tras la presentación de la denuncia y examinada por un psicólogo. Sin embargo, Jérôme Barella no fue ni entrevistado ni interrogado.

Advertisement

Según una fuente cercana al caso, el hombre, de unos cuarenta años, sabía que era el objetivo de la investigación. Acosó a los padres de la presunta víctima y les rogó que retiraran la denuncia, alegando que sentía un gran afecto por su hija.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Obama-appointed judge who blocked Trump birthright citizenship order strikes again, throws out visa overhaul

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An Obama-appointed federal judge who previously blocked President Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order has again dealt a major setback to the administration by striking down Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa payment requirement and declaring the policy unlawful.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin of Massachusetts ruled Monday that the Trump administration lacked the authority to impose the hefty payment on employers seeking new H-1B visas, finding that the requirement amounted to a tax that only Congress has the constitutional power to impose.

In Monday’s 42-page decision, Sorokin sided with a coalition of 20 states that challenged Trump’s September 2025 proclamation creating a new $100,000 payment requirement for employers filing petitions for foreign workers under the H-1B visa program, which allows U.S. employers to hire skilled foreign workers. Approximately 65,000 foreign workers are issued a H-1B visa each year.

TRUMP’S $100K H-1B VISA OVERHAUL COULD HIT TECH GIANTS LIKE AMAZON AND MICROSOFT HARDEST

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. (Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Before Trump’s proclamation, employers typically paid between $2,000 and $5,000 in filing fees to sponsor an H-1B worker, depending on the type of application and the size of the company.

The administration had argued that the measure was necessary to curb abuse of the visa system and protect American workers.

Advertisement

Trump’s proclamation stated that the H-1B program had been exploited to replace U.S. workers with lower-paid foreign labor and that the new payment would help address those concerns.

Sorokin rejected the administration’s legal justification, finding that the Immigration and Nationality Act gives presidents broad authority over the entry of noncitizens but does not authorize them to impose taxes.

«While the Executive has broad discretion over the admission and exclusion of aliens, … that discretion is not boundless,» Sorokin wrote, referring to previous case law.

Advertisement

Sorokin concluded that the payment functioned as a tax rather than a permissible immigration restriction.

TRUMP IS DOWN BUT NOT OUT IN COURT BATTLE OVER HARVARD’S FOREIGN STUDENT VISAS

«The Court finds that the Policy imposes a tax on H-1B petitions without the requisite delegation by Congress,» Sorokin wrote.

Advertisement

He further rejected the administration’s argument that the payment requirement was simply another immigration restriction, bluntly stating: «Taxes are not ‘restrictions.’»

Beyond the constitutional concerns, Sorokin also found that federal agencies violated the Administrative Procedure Act by implementing the policy without notice-and-comment rule making and concluded that the agencies exceeded their statutory authority.

As a remedy, Sorokin declared the policy unlawful and vacated it in its entirety.

Advertisement
Signage for the US Department of State outside headquarters building in Washington DC

Signage for the U.S. Department of State is displayed outside its headquarters in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington, D.C., on April 15, 2025. (Jim Watson/AFP)

Sorokin, a Yale and Columbia Law School graduate, was nominated to the federal bench by President Barack Obama in 2013 and confirmed by the Senate in 2014. Last year, Sorokin was the fourth judge to issue a nationwide injunction blocking Trump’s executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship. He ruled that the policy is likely unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. That dispute has since reached the Supreme Court, and a ruling is expected in the coming weeks.

The administration is expected to appeal Sorokin’s decision, setting up another legal battle over the scope of presidential authority in immigration matters and the limits of executive power.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«President Trump has clear legal authority to restrict entry of any class of aliens he determines is not in America’s best interests, and that is exactly what he did,» White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Fox News Digital. «The H-1B program has been abused for decades, and President Trump finally took action to fix it. A federal judge in Washington already upheld a nearly identical order, and the Administration is confident this order will be reversed on appeal.»

In a separate challenge filed in December 2025, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington declined to block the policy after dismissing claims from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that the additional H-1B charge violated federal immigration law.

Advertisement

federal courts, immigration, congress, donald trump, federal judges, taxes, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias