Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Donald Trump sufrió tres derrotas y logró una victoria en la Corte: podrá destituir funcionarios por razones políticas

Published

on


En una decisión histórica que expande el poder presidencial sobre el gobierno federal, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos votó este lunes permitir que el presidente Donald Trump pueda destituir a un funcionario de un organismo nacional sin causa o por razones políticas, revirtiendo así 90 años de precedentes legales que habían impedido la remoción de cargos independientes.

Esta decisión fue considerada como una “gran victoria” por el jefe de la Casa Blanca, quien también fue derrotado el mismo día por otros tres fallos del máximo tribunal sobre temas distintos que complican al presidente: la Corte consideró que no puede echar a funcionarios de la Reserva Federal; autorizó a que se puedan contar los votos que lleguen por correo hasta 5 días después de las elecciones y rechazó anular la conclusión de un jurado de que el presidente abusó sexualmente a la escritora Jean Carroll y por lo tanto deberá pagar una indemnización de US$5 millones.

Advertisement

En una de las últimas sesiones antes del receso de vacaciones de verano, la Corte decidió sobre una serie de casos diferentes de fuerte impacto.

Luz verde para despedir funcionarios públicos

En un fallo que Trump celebró en sus redes sociales, el Tribunal avaló que el presidente destituya a una miembro demócrata de la Comisión Federal de Comercio, Rebecca Slaughter, por razones políticas, cambiando así 90 años de precedentes que habían impedido la destitución de funcionarios independientes y ampliando significativamente el poder presidencial.

Advertisement

La decisión fue por 6-3, con el voto mayoritario de los jueces conservadores del tribunal, que se alinearon contra los más progresistas

En nombre de la mayoría, el presidente del Tribunal John Roberts declaró que las protecciones de destitución «por causa justificada» impuestas por el Congreso a más de dos docenas de agencias gubernamentales independientes y bipartidistas violaban la separación de poderes. «El presidente puede destituir a sus subordinados a voluntad», escribió Roberts.

La decisión otorga a Trump y a futuros presidentes más control sobre el gobierno y, en la práctica, pone fin a la naturaleza bipartidista e independiente de las agencias reguladoras que supervisan muchos aspectos de la vida estadounidense. La decisión podría afectar a más de 25 agencias independientes de todo el gobierno federal, entre ellas la Comisión Federal de Comercio, la Comisión Federal Electoral, la Comisión de Bolsa y Valores, la Comisión Federal de Comunicaciones y decenas de otras, aisladas de la política en aras de la coherencia regulatoria.

Advertisement

El presidente Trump calificó la decisión del Tribunal Supremo como una «GRAN VICTORIA» en la red Truth Social y «una de las más importantes jamás otorgadas en cuanto a los poderes presidenciales.»

En su disidencia, la jueza Sonia Sotomayor, acompañada por las juezas Elena Kagan y Ketanji Brown Jackson, acusó a sus colegas de respaldar una teoría de «control ejecutivo total» inimaginable para los fundadores del país. «El resultado es un presidente que emerge con mucho más poder que nunca», escribió Sotomayor.

Desde un fallo de 1935, agencias independientes –históricamente lideradas por expertos en la materia de ambos partidos– han vigilado las operaciones bursátiles, los sistemas de transporte, las campañas electorales, la seguridad de productos de consumo y las licencias de radiodifusión. La sentencia supone una derrota para los sectores más progresistas, que durante mucho tiempo han defendido el papel independiente de las agencias.

Advertisement

Límites para la Reserva Federal

Si bien los jueces de la Corte en el primer caso consideraron que Slaughter podía ser destituida, en otra sentencia frenaron los esfuerzos de Trump para destituir a la gobernadora de la FED, Lisa Cook, a quien el presidente había señalado mientras presionaba al banco central para que bajara los tipos de interés. Los jueces subrayaron el “papel único” de la Reserva Federal y advirtieron que el fallo anterior no debía interpretarse como que se extendía al banco central.

En la FED –que tiene una gran influencia sobre la economía y una larga historia de independencia frente a fuerzas políticas– los jueces afirmaron que no se podía despedir a los funcionarios a voluntad, solo por causa justificada.

Advertisement

Luego de que se revelara el fallo, Cook afirmó que el intento del presidente de destituirla “se basó en un pretexto fabricado» por negarse a “ceder ante presiones políticas” para intervenir en las tasas de interés.

Trump buscó minimizar la derrota, dijo que fue una cuestión de “procedimiento” de la Corte y que tomaría “medidas inmediatas y adecuadas para garantizar que alguien que ha cometido irregularidades no tome decisiones vitales sobre el bienestar de Estados Unidos”.

Voto por correo

Advertisement

En otro fallo que significa un revés para Trump, la Corte Suprema confirmó el lunes una ley estatal que permite contar los votos por correo recibidos después del día de la elección.

En una decisión de 5 a 4, el máximo tribunal rechazó una impugnación republicana a una ley del estado de Mississippi que permite contabilizar las boletas enviadas por correo si tienen matasellos del día de la elección y llegan dentro de los cinco días hábiles posteriores a esa jornada.

Trump siempre ha sido un fuerte crítico del voto por correo, que según él contribuyó a su derrota en 2020 frente al demócrata Joe Biden porque supuestamente fueron votos manipulados, algo que no pudo probar ante los tribunales. La realidad es que los votos por correo en recientes elecciones (sobre todo en la de 2020) fueron en mayoría de simpatizantes demócratas.

Advertisement

En marzo firmó una orden ejecutiva para tratar de endurecer las restricciones al sufragio por correspondencia, pero fue bloqueada por tribunales inferiores. En una publicación en Truth Social, Trump calificó el fallo de la Corte como una «pérdida tremenda» para los «derechos de los votantes

El caso Carroll

En otro fallo en contra de Trump, la Corte rechazó este lunes el intento del presidente de anular el veredicto de un jurado que le ordena pagar 5 millones de dólares tras determinar que abusó sexualmente de la escritora E. Jean Carroll en el probador de una tienda de Nueva York a mediados de la década de 1990. El máximo tribunal declinó abordar el caso en una breve orden sin explicación.

Advertisement
Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Europa afronta escasez de agua y desigualdad en el acceso durante la ola de calor

Published

on


El informe alerta de que uno de cada diez ciudadanos de la unión europea ya afronta dificultades hídricas (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)

La ola de calor y la falta de lluvias colocan a varios países de Europa en una situación crítica respecto al acceso al agua. El informe de la organización Europe in Motion ‘Overheated and Underprepared’, y citado por la agencia Euronews, señala que uno de cada diez ciudadanos de la Unión Europea afronta escasez de agua. El consumo promedio del 5,8% de los recursos hídricos europeos no refleja las profundas diferencias existentes entre los Estados miembros.

Chipre representa el caso más grave, con un uso de hasta el 92% de sus recursos de agua dulce en verano, muy por encima del umbral de alerta del 20%. Según el informe, las autoridades chipriotas solicitan a la población una reducción del consumo del 10%, equivalente a dos minutos menos de uso diario por persona. El Gobierno promueve la instalación de plantas desalinizadoras para asegurar el suministro de agua potable, sobre todo en la temporada turística.

Advertisement

Después de Chipre, otros países mediterráneos enfrentan presiones intensas sobre sus recursos hídricos. Malta registra un consumo anual del 33%, que escala al 67% en verano. De acuerdo con datos de la oficina estadística Eurostat y la Agencia Europea de Medio Ambiente (AEMA), la explotación hídrica alcanza niveles de alerta en Grecia (37%), Rumanía (34%), Portugal (31%), Italia (27%) y España (26,5%) durante los meses más cálidos.

El informe subraya que estos valores sitúan a estos países en zonas de alto riesgo, donde la combinación de altas temperaturas y aumento poblacional incrementa la presión sobre los sistemas de abastecimiento. La AEMA advierte que el impacto de la sequía y el cambio climático incrementará la frecuencia y la intensidad de estas crisis al menos hasta 2030.

Las altas temperaturas y la ausencia de lluvias colocan a varios países en una situación crítica - REUTERS/Tom Nicholson
Las altas temperaturas y la ausencia de lluvias colocan a varios países en una situación crítica – REUTERS/Tom Nicholson

La escasez de agua no solo depende de la cantidad disponible. También de la capacidad de los sistemas de distribución. La AEMA indica que aproximadamente el 10% de los europeos tiene dificultades para acceder a agua limpia y segura. El problema es especialmente grave en Chipre (36,5%) y Grecia (31,5%), donde la proporción de población afectada supera ampliamente la media de la Unión Europea.

Llama la atención que países como Bulgaria, Hungría, Croacia e Irlanda, aunque no presentan tasas elevadas de explotación de recursos, enfrentan dificultades para garantizar el acceso debido a infraestructuras envejecidas y sistemas de suministro deficientes. De acuerdo con Euronews, esta situación sugiere que la escasez tiene menos relación con la cantidad de agua y más con la gestión y el mantenimiento de las redes hidráulicas.

Advertisement

Por otro lado, países como Francia, Portugal y España, a pesar de los desafíos en la explotación de agua dulce, lograron mantener bajo el porcentaje de población afectada por la falta de acceso a agua potable y segura. Sus sistemas de distribución muestran una capacidad de respuesta más eficiente, con cifras por debajo de la media europea del 9%.

Las proyecciones señalan que aumentarán la frecuencia y la gravedad de episodios vinculados a veranos más secos - REUTERS/Remo Casilli
Las proyecciones señalan que aumentarán la frecuencia y la gravedad de episodios vinculados a veranos más secos – REUTERS/Remo Casilli

El informe de Europe in Motion resalta que la gestión del agua se convirtió en un asunto prioritario para la Unión Europea, especialmente ante la perspectiva de veranos cada vez más calurosos y secos. La creciente demanda, el turismo estacional y el cambio climático complican la capacidad de los gobiernos para garantizar el suministro a toda la población.

La agencia de noticias internacional, recoge que la urgencia de actuar se refleja en las medidas adoptadas en Chipre y en las advertencias de la AEMA sobre la necesidad de modernizar infraestructuras y aumentar la resiliencia de los sistemas de distribución. La experiencia de los países mediterráneos podría anticipar retos similares en otras regiones si no se aplican soluciones sostenibles.

La disparidad entre los Estados miembros evidencia la necesidad de estrategias diferenciadas y coordinadas, en las que el acceso equitativo y la inversión en tecnología sean ejes centrales para evitar una crisis hídrica generalizada en el continente.

Advertisement



weather

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Gorsuch suggests Supreme Court’s Trump ruling is opening move against administrative state

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Supreme Court may have done more Monday than give President Donald Trump new firing power — it may have opened the door to a far broader challenge to the modern administrative state, the sprawling network of federal agencies that many conservatives have long dubbed the «deep state.»

Advertisement

In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled Trump could lawfully remove Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, overturning much of the nearly 90-year-old Humphrey’s Executor precedent that had protected independent agency officials from at-will dismissal.

While Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion held that the FTC’s leaders must remain accountable to the president because the agency exercises executive power, Gorsuch argued the ruling raises a broader constitutional question over whether Congress can continue allowing executive agencies to exercise sweeping legislative and judicial powers.

«The fourth branch’s powers still exist; they have just been reassigned to the President,» Gorsuch wrote in a concurring opinion.

Advertisement

SCOTUS TAKES UP TRUMP’S BID TO FIRE FTC COMMISSIONER AT WILL — A SHOWDOWN THAT COULD TOPPLE 90-YEAR PRECEDENT

Rebecca Slaughter, commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission, speaks during a House Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington, D.C., on July 13, 2023. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

That observation could become the next major front in the Supreme Court’s ongoing effort to reshape the modern administrative state.

Advertisement

For decades, independent agencies such as the FTC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Communications Commission and National Labor Relations Board have combined multiple governmental functions under one roof. They investigate alleged violations, write regulations carrying the force of law and adjudicate enforcement actions through administrative proceedings.

With Humphrey’s Executor now overruled, those agencies remain intact, but their leadership is subject to presidential control if they exercise executive power. Gorsuch questioned whether Congress can continue delegating broad legislative and judicial authority to agencies that are now unmistakably under presidential supervision.

«The power to write new regulatory crimes still exists,» Gorsuch wrote. «The ability to judge disputes in-house remains, but now the house is white.»

Advertisement

Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network, said Gorsuch’s concurrence points toward the next phase of litigation.

CONGRESS EXPANDED THE EXECUTIVE—ONLY FOR TRUMP TO QUASH MUCH OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE

President Donald Trump speaking during a Rose Garden Club dinner at the White House

President Donald Trump speaks during a Rose Garden Club dinner at the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 25, 2026. He hosted U.S. farmers from Iowa in the newly renovated Rose Garden. (Tierney L. Cross/Getty Images)

«I think the next step in this type of litigation won’t be looking at firings per se, but really trying to make sure all of these administrative agencies actually fall into one of our constitutional buckets,» Severino said. «Are they executive agencies or are they legislative or are they judicial? You can’t straddle all of this.»

Advertisement

She said that while Monday’s ruling restored presidential control over executive agencies, it did not resolve whether those same agencies can continue exercising quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial powers that Congress has delegated over decades.

«There still remains to be more work going back and taking out of these agencies that now are properly under executive control the activities that really aren’t fundamentally executive in nature,» Severino said.

Haley Proctor, a constitutional law professor at Notre Dame Law School, similarly described Gorsuch’s opinion as a roadmap for future legal challenges.

Advertisement

LEGAL CHALLENGES ON ADMINISTRATIVE REACH EXPECTED IN TRUMP’S DEREGULATORY SCHEME, EXPERTS SAY

«I do think what Justice Gorsuch is pointing out is that this is the first step toward rethinking the way in which the administrative state is empowered and structured,» Proctor said.

Rather than simply expanding presidential authority, Proctor said the concurrence raises the possibility that Congress may ultimately have to reclaim powers it has delegated to agencies or assign certain responsibilities back to Article III courts.

Advertisement

«If we’re concerned about the amount of power that the Federal Trade Commission has, then the next step would be to reconsider giving that power to the Federal Trade Commission because some of the decisions that it’s making could be made by Congress instead and some of the decisions that it’s making could be made by the courts,» she said.

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch speaking at a podium indoors

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch speaks at the Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, Calif. (Paul Bersebach/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register)

The majority opinion did not resolve those questions. Instead, Roberts limited the Court’s holding to presidential removal authority, concluding that the FTC «unquestionably exercises executive power» and therefore its commissioners must remain accountable to the president.

The Court stopped short of deciding how much power Congress can give executive agencies to make rules or resolve disputes, saying questions involving agencies such as the Federal Reserve will have to wait.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

But Gorsuch suggested future cases could go much further, arguing the Constitution provides the tools to dismantle much of the modern administrative state. He pointed to several constitutional doctrines that could be used to sharply limit the power of independent federal agencies and return lawmaking authority to Congress and judicial power to the courts.

«From here, the only sure path is to finish the journey we start today and restore legislative and judicial powers to where they belong: in Congress and the courts,» Gorsuch wrote.

Advertisement

supreme court, congress, judiciary, donald trump, executive

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump’s massive GOP faith bloc raises red flag on Iran deal: Trust him, not his team

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Influential evangelical leaders are divided over the Trump administration’s memorandum of understanding with Iran, as conflict continues across the Middle East and debate grows over whether the framework strengthens U.S. leverage or risks harming Israel.

Advertisement

President Donald Trump recently threatened to re-escalate U.S. military strikes against Iran after Tehran continued attacks in the Strait of Hormuz after the regime launched strikes against Kuwait and Bahrain over the weekend, drawing condemnations from both Gulf neighbors.

The split is emerging at a delicate moment for Trump, who is trying to turn military pressure on Iran into a diplomatic framework without alienating supporters who helped power his political coalition. Supporters of the MOU say Trump has earned trust because he weakened Tehran first, while critics say any deal that gives Iran relief before its threat to Israel is permanently neutralized risks betraying the alliance his base expects him to protect.

Dr. Mike Evans, founder of the Friends of Zion Heritage Center in Jerusalem and a close evangelical ally of Trump, told Fox News Digital that many people are underestimating the American president.

Advertisement

EVANGELICAL LEADERS RALLY FOR TRUMP AND ISRAEL AS OPERATION EPIC FURY RESHAPES THE REGION

President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hold a joint press conference in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 29, 2025. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

«The facts are that Donald Trump was key to ending the Gaza war, he was key to getting hostages out of there and he was key in breaking the back of the Iranian regime, including destroying its navy, air force, missile defense and leadership,» Evans said.

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION UNVEILS SWEEPING TERMS OF PROPOSED IRAN AGREEMENT

Vice President JD Vance and Jared Kushner standing together at an event.

Vice President JD Vance and Jared Kushner attend an event related to Iran talks. (Fabrice Coffrini/Reuters)

There are 750 million Bible-believing Christians around the world who identify as Zionists, Evans said, adding that while they may disagree on Israeli political issues, they agree that Israel is the biblical homeland given by God to the Jewish people through Abraham.

While running for president, Trump met with Christian groups, including Evans, and asked whether they would support him, Evans said, adding that they agreed on the condition that he support Christian values in the United States and stand by the State of Israel.

Advertisement

I’M A CHRISTIAN PASTOR WHO WAS BORN IN EGYPT. HERE ARE 3 FACTS I LEARNED ABOUT IRAN’S NUCLEAR OBSESSION

trump pumps fist in air at Faith & Freedom Coalition

President Donald Trump pumps his fist after speaking at the Faith & Freedom Coalition’s 2026 Policy Conference at the Washington Hilton in Washington, DC, on June 26, 2026. (Kent NISHIMURA / AFP via Getty Images)

«He promised to do both and so far he’s exceeded all of our expectations,» Evans said.

«Israel is willing to shed its blood for America in the Middle East. America needs to do everything possible to support the State of Israel. We, as believers, believe that God birthed this nation. We don’t have any fear about Israel’s future,» he added.

Advertisement

U.S. Officials worked with the Israel Defense Forces to complete Operation Epic Fury in February, which was a 38-day effort to dismantle the Iranian regime’s military capabilities. 

«Following the historic destruction of Iran’s military capabilities through the successful Operation Epic Fury, President Trump and his negotiating team have brokered an excellent, performance-based MOU that advances the interests of the United States by ending the fighting, reopening the Strait of Hormuz to significantly lower energy prices, and forcing Iran to commit to abandon its nuclear ambitions,» White House Spokesperson Olivia Wales told Fox News Digital.

«President Trump has a strong relationship with Prime Minister Netanyahu, and Israel has always been a great ally to the United States. There has been no greater friend to Israel and a fighter for peace than President Trump…Americans and our allies around the world are already safer for the United States and Israel’s bold actions to deny the Iranian regime the ability to develop a nuclear weapon,» a White House official added in comment to Fox News Digital.

Advertisement
Vice President JD Vance standing outdoors at Burgenstock hotel complex overlooking Lake Lucerne in Switzerland

Vice President JD Vance stands at the Burgenstock luxury hotel complex overlooking Lake Lucerne in Switzerland prior to a quadrilateral meeting between the United States, Iran, Pakistan and Qatar on June 21, 2026. (Fabrice Coffrini/Keystone)

Rev. Johnnie Moore, President of The Congress of Christian Leaders, told Fox News Digital that in 2016, opposition to President Obama’s catastrophic Iran deal was one of the top three reasons evangelicals rallied to Donald Trump, helping forge one of the most consequential, enduring and powerful political coalitions in American history — a coalition that stands with him still and knows its power.

«Evangelicals know, and President Trump knows, that words on paper don’t change terrorists. Accountability does. Action does. This President has been willing to confront the Iranian regime in ways no predecessor would, and the regime has never been weaker,» Moore said.

TRUMP PIVOTS ON STRIKES WHILE DANGLING IRAN DEAL, TESTING WHETHER TEHRAN BLINKS

Advertisement

«The nuclear threat, at least for now, is gone. What brought Iran to this table was not a memorandum — it was precise and unrelenting military action that shattered their nuclear ambitions and broke their conventional forces,» he continued.

«We also know, as the President knows, that the regime will say and do anything to deceive everyone around him — because they understand they cannot deceive the President himself. Evangelicals trust President Trump entirely. That does not mean that we trust many of those now involved in the negotiation,» he added. 

The risk the president must manage, he said, is that Tehran turns this into a stalling game — as it tried and failed to do with his own team at least twice and did successfully with Presidents Biden and Obama. 

Advertisement

«In the end, because of the President, America will win this too — negotiation or not. But it is clear where our community stands. The regime only understands one language: strength. American strength,» he said.

ISRAEL FEARS TRUMP WEARY OF ‘HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS’ NETANYAHU AND COULD ‘FLIP’ AMID IRAN DEAL: ANALYST 

U.S. sailor signaling launch of MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter aboard USS Gerald R. Ford

A U.S. sailor signals the launch of an MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter aboard the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford while supporting Operation Epic Fury at sea on Feb. 28. (U.S. Navy via Getty Images)

Other leaders expressed concerns over recent comments on Israel from the administration. Laurie Cardoza-Moore, president of Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, told Fox News Digital that evangelical Christians were largely responsible for the election of the current administration and said the agreement with Iran is extremely worrying.

Advertisement

«One of our core issues is the Biblical requirement to stand with Israel and G-d’s chosen people as described in the Books of Genesis and Obadiah. As the Bible teaches, those who stand with Israel will be blessed, and those who curse her will be cursed,» she said.

«There is a strong feeling that Israel is being betrayed and thrown under the bus in favor of the Islamic Republic of Iran. We are particularly concerned about recent harsh and false statements made by Vice President Vance, which could be perceived as cursing Israel,» she added.

The office of the vice president declined to comment when approached by Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

Vance has supported Israel but has also said he is willing to criticize the country when he believes its actions warrant it. He condemned antisemitism in February, telling the Daily Mail, «I think Jew hatred is disgusting.»

«You shouldn’t hate people because they’re white. You shouldn’t hate people because they’re Jewish. You shouldn’t hate people because they’re black,» he said.

But Vance has also made clear that support for Israel does not mean automatic agreement with Netanyahu’s government.

Advertisement

«Prime Minister Netanyahu, look, he governs a country that has obviously been a very close partner of the United States. But, even when we’ve been close partners, sometimes we have interests that are perfectly aligned, and sometimes we have interests that are misaligned,» Vance said in an interview on «CBS Sunday Morning» June 10.

TRUMP’S IRAN AGREEMENT RAISES A BASIC QUESTION: IS IT ACTUALLY A DEAL?

USS Gerald R. Ford conducting flight operations at sea

The U.S. Navy’s USS Gerald R. Ford conducts flight operations in support of Operation Epic Fury at an undisclosed location on March 9, 2026. (DVIDS/Reuters)

The Trump administration publicly released details of the memorandum outlining plans for immediate waivers on Iranian oil exports, a framework for at least $300 billion in reconstruction and economic development assistance if a final agreement is reached, and a 60-day negotiating period aimed at securing a comprehensive deal on Iran’s nuclear program.

Advertisement

Pastor John Hagee, founder and chairman of Christians United for Israel, told Fox News Digital that, in its current form, the MOU appears ill-advised at best, as the military gains achieved by Washington and Jerusalem have yet to be fully realized.

«I have yet to hear from anyone who was not surprised by such an about face in signing the MoU. Who would not be concerned with the U.S. effectively agreeing to forever negotiations with a highly militarized radical Islamist regime, flush with cash, in pursuit of nuclear weapons,» Hagee said.

Most evangelical Christians, he added, see what everyone else sees: The U.S. negotiating team appears to have fumbled the ball on the one-yard line. Nevertheless, the U.S.-Israel alliance remains a cornerstone of both countries’ security as well as a key pillar of global stability.

Advertisement

AMERICANS KNOW IRAN IS OUR ENEMY. IT’S TIME ESTABLISHMENT POLITICIANS AGREED

trump g7 iran presser

Trump gestures as he addresses the media alongside United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, US Commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent during a closing press conference at the G7 summit, in Evian, eastern France (Mandel NGAN / AFP via Getty Images)

RETIRED US MILITARY LEADERS SUPPORT LETTING ISRAEL ‘FINISH THE JOB’ AGAINST IRAN, PROXIES

«From a religious perspective, we have a divine mandate to stand with Israel. From a national security perspective, we have no stronger or wiser ally anywhere in the world. And from the Christian pilgrim’s perspective, our holy sites in the Holy Land have never been more open and yet more secure,» Hagee said.

Advertisement

«The most «America-first» thing one can do is stand with our only true ally in the region,» he continued.

«The Islamic Republic declared war on the West the day it was founded nearly half a century ago. That has not changed. Democracies rarely get to decide who their enemies are. The only conclusion to this conflict is regime change through domestic revolution in Iran,» Hagee added.

MORNING GLORY: PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE US ARE WAGING A RIGHTEOUS BATTLE — AND WINNING

Advertisement
Eden Alexander and Mike Evans in Israel.

Dr. Mike Evans, founder of the Friends of Zion Heritage Center in Jerusalem, meets with former Hamas hostage Edan Alexander. (Shlomi Amsalem)

After the 60-day timeframe, Evans predicted Trump is likely to extend negotiations for another 90 days, carrying them through the end of the year and beyond the midterm elections. President Trump, Evans said, will then break the economic back of the regime, take Kharg Island and completely bankrupt the regime.

«I am not panicking because I know Donald Trump. I am the strongest supporter in the state of Israel of Donald Trump. I am the one that hosted the embassy gala, put up all the billboards and gave him an award. I am not panicking over this,» he added.

Evans said Christians do not believe the battle can be won by bombs alone, and that they view prayer as their most powerful weapon.

Advertisement

«We are hosting the largest prayer in history at the Kotel (Western Wall) with 5 to 10 million Christians on Oct. 7. I now have more than a dozen ambassadors involved and 23 additional ones I am meeting with who want to represent their country,» he said.

Dr. Jürgen Bühler, president of the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ), said his organization has witnessed up close for decades how the Iranian regime has progressively raised the sword of radical Islam over Israel, as well as over indigenous Christians throughout the Middle East.

«Given the current deal being worked out with Iranian leaders, we share the sense of most Israelis that the war against this intolerable Iranian threat has been stopped short of its needed objective,» he told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«Israel is a fellow Western democracy that deserves our full support in its fight to defend our shared freedoms and values, and many Christians in this region look to Israel as a light of hope for securing their own freedoms and futures,» he added.

Ultimately, Bühler said, the best and most just answer to the Iranian threat is genuine regime change in Tehran.

«We have not given up hope that the Iranian people themselves will be able to rise up and overcome their oppressive rulers and steer their nation away from this self-destructive obsession with destroying Israel,» he said.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Heather Johnston, founder and president of the U.S.-Israel Education Association, said in a statement to Fox News Digital in reaction to the MoU that the U.S.-Israel relationship has advanced American interests for decades and should be strengthened — not strained — by U.S. diplomacy with Iran.

«Iran’s long record of supporting terrorism and threatening Israel gives Americans ample reason to assess this agreement carefully and skeptically. Any diplomacy with Iran should be measured against whether it advances or undermines that progress,» she said.

Advertisement

donald trump, evangelical, war with iran, iran, israel

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias