Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

FIRST ON FOX: DOJ sues Spanberger’s Virginia over laws kneecapping federal agents as mask war escalates

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: The Justice Department sued The Commonwealth of Virginia on Thursday over two new laws the DOJ says would subject masked federal agents to criminal penalties and threaten local ICE cooperation agreements.

Advertisement

«Law enforcement officers risk their lives every day to keep Americans safe, and they do not deserve to be doxed or harassed simply for carrying out their duties,» said acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in comment provided to Fox News Digital on Thursday. «Virginia’s anti-law enforcement policies regulate the federal government and are designed to create risk for our agents. These laws cannot stand.»

The lawsuit, first shared with Fox News Digital, argues Virginia is violating the Constitution by attempting to dictate how federal officers carry out law enforcement operations — including when they can wear masks, what identifying information they must display and whether local agencies can maintain ICE cooperation agreements unless the federal government accepts state-imposed conditions. The DOJ said the laws threaten officer safety, undermine federal immigration enforcement and violate the Supremacy Clause.

At the heart of the suit, are a pair of laws that Democratic Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger signed, which are set to take effect on July, including: one restricting law enforcement officers, including federal officers, from wearing facial coverings while on duty and requiring them to display identifying information, and another imposing state-mandated conditions on federal immigration enforcement agreements.

Advertisement

ICE PRESSURES SPANBERGER AS FAIRFAX MURDER SUSPECTS TRIGGER NEW DETAINERS IN ‘SANCTUARY’ CLASH

The Justice Department sued Virginia over laws that officials say could punish masked federal agents and dismantle local ICE cooperation deals. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The DOJ said federal officers who violate Virginia’s mask and identification law could face a Class 1 misdemeanor, punishable under Virginia law by up to 12 months in jail, a fine of up to $2,500, or both.

Advertisement

The lawsuit names Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones and left-wing Fairfax County Commonwealth Attorney Steve Descano — who was previously backed by groups connected to George Soros. 

The suit claims Virginia’s mask ban is «blatantly unconstitutional» because it attempts to regulate «what federal officers may and may not wear» while carrying out their duties, exposing agents’ identities and increasing risks to them and their families.

«The Department of Justice will steadfastly protect the privacy and safety of law enforcement from unconstitutional state laws like Virginia’s,» said Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate of the DOJ’s Civil Division in the press release.

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS CALIFORNIA LAW FORCING ICE AGENTS TO REMOVE MASKS DURING OPERATIONS

Abigail Spanberger

Spanberger restricted ICE agents from operating on state properties and requiring federal agents to wear visible badges and barred law enforcement from wearing facial masks while on duty in May. (Mike Kropf/Richmond Times-Dispatch)

DOJ is seeking a court order to block both laws that begin July 1.

Spanberger, Jones and Descano have all moved to counter the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement agenda in Virginia.

Advertisement

In February, Spanberger issued an executive order that rescinded a Youngkin-era order directing state law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts.

TOM HOMAN VOWS TO WORK AROUND NEW DEM VA GOV SPANBERGER’S EXECUTIVE ORDER ENDING ICE COOPERATION

Anti-ICE agitators blocking vehicles outside Delaney Hall detention facility in Newark

Anti-ICE agitators attempted to block vehicles from leaving the Delaney Hall detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, on Friday night. (FreedomNewsTV)

«The President told us that we are safer because unaccountable, poorly trained ICE agents are arresting mothers and detaining children. Our broken immigration system is something to be fixed — not an excuse to terrorize our communities,» Spanberger posted on X in response to Trump’s State of the Union.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The suit comes as there have been ongoing protests outside the Delaney Hall immigration detention center in New Jersey where protesters verbally abused ICE agents, obstructed vehicles, allegedly assaulted officers, and made threats leading to multiple arrests.

«Governor Spanberger cannot tell Federal officers how to do their job,» said Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward in the press release. «She certainly cannot prohibit them from ensuring their own safety in conducting Federal law enforcement operations. Our suit today stops those unconstitutional efforts.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to the offices of Gov. Spanberger and AG Jones for comment.

virginia, justice department, immigration, donald trump

INTERNACIONAL

UN chief backs official who reposted anti-Israel activist’s claims amid calls for investigation

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A top United Nations official is once again under fire for smearing Israel by sharing a social media message originally posted by a woman facing charges of incitement to terror and expressing support of Hamas.

Advertisement

On June 18, U.N. Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict Vanessa Frazier reposted an image of three small objects which the original poster, Sarah Wilkinson, claimed were cluster munitions «disguised as children’s toys» that Israelis had been «strategically dropping» over Lebanon. In her own post, Frazier stated, «If this is true it means that there is a deliberate, premeditated intent to kill children.»

Frazier, who has over 10,000 followers on X, has since deleted the post, but a screenshot of the original was provided to Fox News Digital.

HEZBOLLAH’S SECRET ‘KILL, WOUND AND MAIM’ BOMB NETWORK EXPOSED AS ISRAEL STRIKES BEIRUT

Advertisement

In response to questions about whether United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stood behind Frazier’s repost of Wilkinson’s remarks, Guterres’ spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric told Fox News Digital that «the retweet was deleted a while ago and, as you know, [the] retweet in no way implies an endorsement of the person who posted the original tweet.»

Andrew Fox a senior fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital that «it is farcical that a U.N. official should be so gullible.» 

Advertisement

Fox, a former British army officer who has studied and written about Israel Defense Forces (IDF) tactics, said it was «deeply telling that a U.N. official should leap to share the ancient, antisemitic blood libel that Jews kill children. This is the toxic atmosphere that nearly three years of lies have created around Israel. Any allegation against the Jewish state, no matter how outlandish, is immediately given credence. This is another nail in the coffin of the U.N. Special Representative’s credibility and reputation.»

An IDF spokesman told Fox News Digital that the «allegation is baseless and unfounded. It is fake news, and we categorically reject it.»

The original poster of the cluster munitions accusation was arrested in the United Kingdom on terror charges in 2024, according to the World Socialist Web Site. The site, as well as Al Mayadeen English, — Hezbollah’s media arm – link Wilkinson to the social media profile on X which shared the post Frazier elevated.

Advertisement

BRITISH MUSLIM POLICE GROUP CALLED IDF A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION, QUESTIONED HAMAS ATROCITY REPORTS

The BBC reported last week that Wilkinson will face trial in January on «two counts of encouragement of terrorism on social media, two counts of expressing an opinion or belief that was supportive of a proscribed organization, namely Hamas; and one of failing to comply with a police investigation.»

Though Wilkinson discussed her arrests and subsequent charges on her X account, she did not respond to Fox News Digital’s messages asking for comment about the charges she currently faces.

Advertisement

In response to questions about her removal of the X post and concerns about its original source, Frazier said that «regarding specific tweets, I understand why some of my social media activities have generated questions. Where concerns arose regarding posts, I took appropriate action. Nonetheless, the intended message is to emphasize the alarm of the Secretary-General in his Annual Report regarding the use of explosive weapons in populated areas in Lebanon, a matter that raises serious humanitarian concerns due to their long-lasting impact on civilians.»

ISRAELI AMBASSADOR, UN OFFICIAL SHOUT OVER EACH OTHER IN TENSE EXCHANGE OVER SEXUAL VIOLENCE BLACKLIST

Frazier said that, «Ultimately, my mandate is not carried out through social media. It is carried out through the United Nations’ established monitoring and verification methodology, which applies the same standards to all parties to conflict.»

Advertisement

In March, JNS reported that Frazier posted that she was «deeply alarmed by reports of attacks on Iranian schools leaving a large number of casualties, mostly children.» A photograph accompanying the post showed numerous black body bags. When it became clear that the photo depicted victims of the Iranian regime’s crackdown on protesters, Frazier removed the post. She then created a new post with a similar sentiment featuring an updated picture.

On June 24, Israel’s Ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon sent a letter to the U.N. Security Council president raising Israel’s «grave concerns regarding conduct that appears inconsistent with the neutrality, professionalism, and impartiality expected of a senior United Nations official.»

In his letter, a copy of which was provided to Fox News Digital, Danon said that Frazier’s social media behavior suggests «a troubling pattern of engagement with unverified, disputed, or misleading material, alongside content raising concerns about antisemitic framing and extremist rhetoric.»

Advertisement

Danon also raised concerns about Frazier’s «abrupt interruption of [his] remarks during a United Nations side event,» which he said was «in disregard of basic procedural norms and the respect owed to Member States.»

Reuters called this exchange between Danon and Frazier «a furious shouting match.»

Frazier told Fox News Digital that her «intervention was procedural, not political. Its purpose was to help ensure that the discussion remained consistent with the standards expected in a United Nations forum,» where discussions «are expected to be conducted in accordance with established procedures and with respect for the dignity of participants and officials.»

Advertisement

The June 17 release of the Secretary-General’s Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict has also raised concerns.

Anne Bayefsky, President of Human Rights Voices and Director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust, told Fox News Digital that the allegations in the report were «wild, dangerous blood libels divorced from reality.»

Bayefsky blasted the U.N.’s use of the term «verified» when describing allegations, despite a lack of description of how and through what sources those supposed verifications occurred.

Advertisement

She said, «It is important to recognize the direct connection between the ancient antisemitic blood libels accusing evil Jews of murdering non-Jewish children and the U.N. actors who repeat the same ugly falsehoods today. History teaches us just how dangerous these depraved lies are for Jews wherever they live.»

Frazier defended the report, saying it was «the product of a rigorous United Nations (U.N.) monitoring and verification process and reflects information reviewed at multiple levels of the U.N. system.» She said that «suggesting that the report is based on falsehoods does a disservice to all child victims, including Israeli children whose suffering is also documented in the report.»

Frazier also maintained she has «no bias against the State of Israel or against any Member States of the United Nations, and reject[s] the characterization,» saying that «as a U.N. official, accuracy, impartiality, and credibility are fundamental to my work.»

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

When asked by Fox News Digital if Guterres would examine Frazier’s tenure, Dujarric responded that «the Secretary-General has full confidence in Vanessa Frazier and her work.»

He defended Frazier, saying she «has not ‘vilified’ and is not ‘vilifying’ the State of Israel, or any other country for that matter. Her focus is not on any one single country but on the protection of children throughout the world. Under the mandate the Security Council has given her, she does not ‘blacklist’ Member States or other parties. The report exists to find ways to get all of the parties listed to improve their behavior, so that children can be protected in concrete ways. She has been effective in doing just that.» 

Advertisement

Danon said that «it comes as no surprise that Secretary-General Guterres expresses full confidence in Ms. Frazier.» He said that Frazier’s report «is a symptom of [Guterres’] tenure. Under his leadership, the United Nations has repeatedly failed to uphold the standards of impartiality it claims to represent.»



anti semitism, united nations, israel, hamas, terrorism

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Estupor en Estados Unidos por el hallazgo de 16 chicos en estado «casi salvaje» en una casa rural: «Una escena repugnante»

Published

on


Dieciséis niños de la misma familia que fueron rescatados de una casa en ruinas en la zona rural de Ohio vivían en condiciones deplorables, rodeados de excrementos humanos y confinados a una sola habitación durante gran parte de los últimos cuatro años, según informaron las autoridades el miércoles.

Algunos de los niños descubiertos el martes no podían hablar y una de ellas, una joven de 18 años con discapacidad intelectual, ni siquiera podía escribir su nombre, según informaron los investigadores.

Advertisement

“Una escena repugnante”

“La mayoría de nuestro ganado se mantiene en mejores condiciones que esos chicos”, dijo el sheriff del condado de Vinton, Ryan Cain. “Una escena repugnante”.

Según informó un fiscal, los padres de los niños y dos de sus abuelos fueron acusados ​​de un delito grave de poner en peligro a menores.

Advertisement

Las autoridades encontraron a los niños mientras ejecutaban una orden de registro en una investigación no relacionada, dijo el miércoles el fiscal general de Ohio, Andy Wilson, en una conferencia de prensa.

Los padres de los niños y dos de sus abuelos fueron acusados. Foto: AP

Según las autoridades, parecía que nadie fuera de la familia sabía de la existencia de los niños, que no estaban matriculados en la escuela.

No sabíamos que iba a haber 16 niños allí”, dijo Wilson, quien casi se quedó sin palabras al describir lo que los funcionarios encontraron en el pequeño pueblo de Hamden, ubicado en uno de los condados más pobres de Ohio.

“Es el tipo de cosas que no solemos ver aquí en Estados Unidos”, dijo.

Advertisement
La casa quedó encintada por la policía. Foto: AP

Los niños rescatados parecían «animales salvajes»

El sheriff declaró que, al parecer, los niños pasaban la mayor parte del tiempo en una habitación de aproximadamente 3,5 por 3,5 metros. No reveló cómo mantenían a los niños dentro de la casa, pero afirmó que las autoridades no encontraron jaulas.

Los menores tenían entre un año y medio y 18 años, tanto niños como niñas, según informaron las autoridades. Siete fueron trasladados a hospitales en Columbus y dos fueron evacuados en helicóptero. Uno de ellos se encontraba en estado crítico el martes, mientras que otros fueron ingresados ​​para recibir atención médica, indicó Wilson.

“Parecía animales casi salvajes”, dijo Wilson. “Fue terrible”.

Advertisement

Los niños quedaron bajo la custodia temporal del Departamento de Empleo y Servicios Familiares de Ohio.

El fiscal del condado de Vinton, William Archer, dijo que los cuatro adultos fueron acusados ​​de un delito grave de segundo grado por poner en peligro a un menor, ya que implica «daños físicos graves».

Advertisement

Gary Siders Jr., Gary Siders Sr., Christina Siders y Elizabeth Siders comparecieron ante el tribunal el miércoles, donde una jueza les fijó una fianza de 300.000 dólares a cada uno. Aún no se les ha asignado un abogado.

Steve Irwin, portavoz de la fiscalía general, no quiso precisar si todos los niños son hermanos ni qué parentesco tienen.

Un vecino no vio a ningún niño.

Advertisement

La casa donde encontraron a los niños se encuentra en una calle apartada, junto a un empinado terraplén ferroviario, por donde circulan trenes que retumban al pasar por Hamden. Las casas vecinas más cercanas están separadas por árboles y matorrales espesos, pero la casa es fácilmente visible desde la carretera.

Debris is seen inside a home where authorities say they removed 16 children and arrested four adults in Hamden, Ohio, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Una puerta abierta dejaba ver restos de basura en el interior, mientras que una terraza de madera y el patio trasero estaban llenos de neumáticos desechados, una trona y otros escombros.

Los investigadores dijeron que los miembros de la familia se habían mudado varias veces por el sur de Ohio en las últimas dos décadas y que, al parecer, evitaron crear registros médicos y gubernamentales.

Una puerta abierta dejaba ver restos de basura en el interior. Foto: AP

“Esta gente era bastante buena escondiendo a estos niños”, dijo Wilson.

Los investigadores estaban revisando si la familia había sido denunciada ante alguna agencia de servicios infantiles con anterioridad.

Advertisement

El vecino Joseph Stewart, de 60 años, dijo que no había visto «ningún niño» desde que la familia se mudó a tres casas de distancia y que podía ver claramente la casa y el jardín al pasar por allí.

La casa rural abierta y llena de objetos. Foto: AP

“Es una situación triste”, dijo. Stewart ha vivido en esa calle durante seis años y la describió como “un barrio tranquilo”.

El miércoles, las puertas y ventanas de la casa permanecían abiertas, expuestas al calor sofocante. Un montón de objetos infantiles desechados —dos bicicletas rotas, una mesa de juegos de plástico, un cubo de playa y dos portabebés— se amontonaban en el patio.

Hamden tiene una población de menos de 1.000 habitantes y se encuentra a unos 97 kilómetros (60 millas) al sureste de Columbus.

Advertisement
Diversos objetos, incluida una silla alta en la vivienda de Hamden. Foto: AP

Condiciones inimaginables

“Son condiciones inimaginables para la gente, y mucho menos para los niños”, declaró el fiscal general de Ohio, Andy Wilson, en una rueda de prensa al describir el estado en que fueron encontrados los chicos.

Varios de los menores se encontraban en estado grave al ser encontrados, y dos tuvieron que ser trasladados en helicóptero a centros de traumatología de primer nivel debido a la gravedad de sus heridas.

La casa en situación de abandono. Foto: AP

Wilson afirmó que era la peor escena que había presenciado en toda su carrera, describiendo lo que vio como «pura maldad».

Las fuerzas del orden también ejecutaron una segunda orden de registro en la vivienda el martes, y la investigación continúa.

Advertisement

“Se hará justicia para estos niños”, dijo Wilson.

Otros casos de abuso familiar

El hallazgo de los niños recuerda a casos horribles de abuso familiar ocurridos en el pasado.

Advertisement

En 2019, David y Louise Turpin se declararon culpables de tortura y años de abusos que incluían encadenar a algunos de sus 13 hijos en su casa de California, dejarlos morir de hambre y proporcionarles solo una educación mínima.

Fueron condenados a cadena perpetua con posibilidad de libertad condicional tras 25 años. La pareja fue arrestada en 2018 después de que su hija de 17 años escapara de casa y llamara al 911.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

‘It’s insane’: GOP senator says Supreme Court birthright ruling hands China a citizenship loophole

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: In the midst of a blitz of Republicans shaking their fists at the Supreme Court, one Senate Republican is warning of national security consequences for the court’s bombshell birthright citizenship decision.

Advertisement

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., worries that the court’s 6-3 decision leaves America vulnerable to threats, particularly from China. In an interview with Fox News Digital, he explained a multistep path that lawmakers and the administration could take to tackle the issue.

«I want to get this done because I really believe that the future of our country is on the line,» Schmitt said. «We can’t have Chinese generals sending their wives to this country to give birth and going back for 18 years and coming back and being citizens. It’s insane.»

ALITO WARNS SUPREME COURT MADE ‘SERIOUS MISTAKE’ THAT COULD HAVE NATIONAL SECURITY CONSEQUENCES

Advertisement

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., questions FBI Director Kash Patel during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on September 16, 2025. (AFP via Getty Images)

While some lawmakers want a constitutional amendment and others are pushing legislation, Schmitt has a foot in both camps. He contended that in all, there is «a short-term, medium-term and long-term solution.»

«The short-term is executive action, the medium-term is our legislative action that we could take, and then the long-term solution is the constitutional amendment,» Schmitt said. «I think we should pursue all of those.»

Advertisement

The clearest shot to counter the court’s decision would be through a constitutional amendment, but legislation may be the more realistic route, he said. He’s following the breadcrumb trail left by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to do it, too.

SUPREME COURT RULING SPARKS RACE TO KILL A MULTIBILLION-DOLLAR LOOPHOLE IN CONGRESS

«Congress could — consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment — amend or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country,» Kavanaugh wrote in the court’s decision. «But Congress has not yet done so.»

Advertisement

Schmitt’s legislation would clarify the language of the 14th Amendment. The court interpreted the words «subject to the jurisdiction thereof» within the text to effectively mean all children born in the U.S. are automatically granted citizenship.

His plan is to modify the language to include «not subject to a foreign power,» which he contended would return the 14th Amendment to its original intent and prevent foreign adversaries from quietly scoring citizenship.

REPUBLICANS DECLARE WAR ON ‘ORGANIZED THEFT’ WITH GOVERNMENT FRAUD CRACKDOWN

Advertisement
Military parade in Beijing marks 70th anniversary of Chinese People's Republic

DF-17 Dongfeng medium-range ballistic missiles equipped with a DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle, shown during a military parade to mark the 70th anniversary of the Chinese People’s Republic. (Zoya Rusinova/TASS via Getty Images)

«That would get back to what the meaning was supposed to be, that the court got wrong, which would give us the opportunity, I think, for potentially the decision to be overturned, because Congress has clarified it,» Schmitt said.

But, like nearly every legislative push in the Senate, the 60-vote filibuster threshold is a barrier.

That means that Schmitt, or any Republican pushing a bill dealing with birthright citizenship, will need Democratic support to pass.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Schmitt pointed to the late former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s bill from 1993, the Immigration Stabilization Act, which among other things sought to tweak the 14th Amendment to prevent children of illegal immigrants born in the U.S. from gaining citizenship, as a marker that at one point, Democrats supported the same thing he and Republicans are pushing for.

«It wasn’t that long ago that Harry Reid actually had legislation to deal with this issue,» he said. «And so, you know, are the Democrats going to be a party that learned their lesson from the Biden years where they were open borders and they let 15 to 20 million people here illegally?»

Advertisement

«They don’t believe in sovereignty that we can tell people who can come and who can go,» Schmitt continued. «Is that who they are, or are they gonna make a shift more towards where the American people are at?»

politics, immigration, constitution, national security, senate

Continue Reading

Tendencias