Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

How CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin’s family foundation became a major funder of left-wing activist groups

Published

on



CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin’s family foundation became a major financial backer of a network of left-wing activist organizations over more than two decades, providing nearly $3.2 million to CodePink while also bankrolling protest groups, legal advocacy organizations and progressive nonprofits, a Digital investigation found.

The foundation, Arc of Justice, is a $54.6 million private foundation formerly known as The Benjamin Fund. A review of its complete IRS filing history found it made nearly 1,500 grants totaling about $24.6 million to organizations involved in anti-war activism, progressive policy, legal advocacy and campaigns involving immigration enforcement, China, Cuba and the Israel-Hamas war.

Advertisement

Among its largest recipients were CodePink, Global Exchange, the Center for Constitutional Rights, Grassroots International and Social Good Fund, alongside grants to dozens of other organizations involved in anti-war activism, progressive policy, legal advocacy and progressive media.

Arc of Justice provided CodePink more than twice the approximately $1.33 million the group received from the funding network linked to Shanghai-based Marxist tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham. A previous five-part Digital investigation found Singham’s network directed at least $278 million into organizations that promoted pro-China messaging.

LAWMAKERS THROW OUT ‘TROJAN HORSE’ ACTIVISTS THEY SAY ARE ENGAGED IN AMERICAN SUBVERSION

Advertisement

Arc of Justice has come under scrutiny after California revoked its charitable registration following years of financial compliance failures, though the foundation has been working to regain its standing with California regulators.

Benjamin, who co-founded CodePink with Singham’s wife Jodie Evans, has remained one of the group’s most visible public faces, frequently leading protests and interrupting congressional hearings. On Tuesday, she was escorted from a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee hearing on alleged foreign malign influence after protesting during the proceedings.

The Digital investigation also found the foundation itself has undergone sweeping changes in recent months, with Benjamin stepping down from the board, new leadership taking over and the organization saying it intends to chart a different course for its charitable giving.

Advertisement

Arc of Justice began funding CodePink in 2009 and provided grants to the organization in 15 tax years through 2024, totaling $3,195,280.

According to the documents, CodePink was Arc of Justice’s largest activist beneficiary. Since 2009, the foundation and its predecessor, The Benjamin Fund, also directed about $2.05 million to Global Exchange, the anti-war and social justice advocacy group Benjamin co-founded with her former husband, Kevin Danaher, which has long campaigned against U.S. military intervention and economic sanctions.

Arc of Justice also provided about $2.24 million to Grassroots International, which funds grassroots social movements around the world; $1.61 million to Social Good Fund, which provides nonprofit infrastructure and fundraising support for charitable projects; about $1.29 million to the Center for Constitutional Rights, a legal advocacy organization; and about $114,000 to Alliance for Global Justice (AFGJ), an activist nonprofit.

Advertisement

AFGJ has drawn scrutiny over its past fiscal sponsorship of Samidoun, a pro-Palestinian activist group later sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury. Benjamin said Arc’s final grant to Alliance for Global Justice was $10,000 in 2022 and that the foundation «was not aware of any specific groups fiscally sponsored by AFGJ» when it made its grants.

Through attorney David Levitt, the foundation said both CodePink and Alliance for Global Justice were recognized by the IRS as tax-exempt public charities and that Arc was entitled to rely on that status when making its grants.

The grantmaking reached across a much broader activist network. Since 2009, IRS filings reviewed by Digital show Arc of Justice and its predecessor gave about $492,000 to World Beyond War, roughly $255,000 to the Institute for Policy Studies and about $124,000 to Jewish Voice for Peace. It also gave $110,000 to Grassroots Global Justice and about $90,000 to the Center for Popular Democracy.

Advertisement

IRS filings also show Arc of Justice and its predecessor provided about $65,500 to Democracy Now! since 2009, where Benjamin has frequently appeared as a guest over the years.

Founded in 2002 with the aim of preventing the Iraq War, CodePink has grown into one of the country’s most visible anti-war protest groups, repeatedly disrupting congressional hearings and protests involving senior U.S. officials, including then-Secretaries of State John Kerry and Mike Pompeo. The group has also participated in nationwide No Kings protests, opposed ICE enforcement actions, organized anti-Israel rallies and campaigned against U.S. policy toward China, Cuba and Iran. Earlier this year, CodePink led a delegation to Cuba that included Twitch political streamer Hasan Piker.

Asked about Arc’s long-term funding of CodePink and other activist organizations, Matthew Johnson, a senior fellow at the Jamestown Foundation, said sustained financial support can have an impact well beyond the dollar amounts involved.

Advertisement

«Small amounts of money can actually go a long way toward impacting the broader media ecosystem… from the perspective of political organization, they may be having an outsized impact on the kind of information that is available to Americans,» Johnson told Digital.

Johnson, who testified before Congress Tuesday about how foreign adversaries may use nonprofits and other organizations to shape U.S. public opinion and policy, told lawmakers that CodePink launched its «China Is Not Our Enemy» campaign in 2020 following meetings in Beijing and has since pursued China-focused advocacy and organized travel. The campaign argued the United States should pursue cooperation with Beijing rather than confrontation. CodePink and Benjamin have denied taking direction from the Chinese government.

WATCH: Heritage Foundation senior fellow confronts CodePink’s Medea Benjamin before House hearing

Advertisement

Benjamin told Digital the grants were intended to support CodePink’s anti-war work.

«The foundation’s donations to CodePink were made to support its anti-war work,» she said in an email response.

At the House hearing on Tuesday, Benjamin also rejected suggestions that she or CodePink took direction from foreign governments. «I’ve been an anti-war activist from the days of Vietnam,» Benjamin said. «I never had a foreign government tell me what to do.»

Advertisement

Singham and the organizations he has funded, identified in the Digital report, have denied taking direction from the Chinese government, and neither Singham, Benjamin nor the organizations have been charged with wrongdoing.

CHINA EXPERT WARNS BEIJING WANTS AMERICANS — NOT THE CCP — TO SPREAD ITS MESSAGE

Arc of Justice was formerly known as The Benjamin Fund, Inc., with California corporate records showing the foundation formally changed its name in November 2019.

Advertisement

Benjamin’s father, Alvin Benjamin, a prominent Long Island real estate developer who founded The Benjamin Companies in the early 1960s, provided some of the foundation’s earliest documented financial backing.

The Benjamin Fund’s initial 2003 IRS return shows he contributed a partnership interest valued at $683,715 to the foundation, with Medea Susan Benjamin serving as president.

Much larger contributions followed. In 2010, the estate of Benjamin’s mother, Rose Benjamin, contributed $10,863,060, according to the foundation’s IRS filing. Five years later, the Estate of Alvin Benjamin contributed another $15 million, followed by another $8,603,450 in 2019.

Advertisement

Medea Benjamin — identified as Susan Benjamin on the filing — personally contributed $1 million to Arc of Justice in 2022, listing a Miami address.

Arc of Justice’s wealth was largely tied to an investment portfolio that continued to grow while the foundation distributed millions of dollars in grants.

Federal tax returns reviewed by Digital show the foundation’s assets grew from $39.63 million at the end of 2020 to $54.64 million in 2024, as it distributed millions of dollars annually in grants.

Advertisement

Arc of Justice generated much of its annual income from its investment portfolio, collecting dividends from stocks and mutual funds, interest on cash holdings and profits from investments that had increased in value.

In 2023, the foundation reported nearly $2 million in revenue, including $1.11 million in dividends and interest from securities, $166,421 in interest on savings and temporary cash investments and $686,919 in net gains from asset sales.

Its investment holdings also produced substantial gains as the portfolio increased in value. In 2020, Arc of Justice reported $12,344,501 in unrealized gains on securities, helping push its year-end assets to nearly $40 million.

Advertisement

Over more than two decades, IRS filings reviewed by Digital repeatedly reported no compensation for the foundation’s officers and no highly paid employees, while the foundation directed millions of dollars to outside organizations.

After California revoked Arc of Justice’s charitable registration, Digital reported that a new Florida nonprofit using the Arc of Justice name was incorporated at the Miami home of Benjamin’s longtime partner, Tighe Barry, raising questions about the future of the foundation and whether its assets or operations were being moved out of California.

The address is a modest turquoise home largely obscured by trees — an unassuming setting for an organization tied to a private foundation with more than $50 million in assets. Benjamin and Barry have frequently appeared together at CodePink demonstrations over the years.

Advertisement

Levitt later told Digital the Florida corporation had been created as a «placeholder» while the foundation considered relocating its operations from California, but the move was never completed. He said the California corporation was never formally dissolved, no assets were transferred and the Florida entity «holds no assets and has conducted no business.»

The foundation has been attempting to get its registration reinstated after recently filing five years of overdue reports covering 2020 through 2024 and paying $1,800 in filing fees and penalties as part of a petition for reinstatement, documents submitted to California regulators show.

$54M CODEPINK-LINKED FOUNDATION SHUT DOWN IN CALIFORNIA POPS UP AT RAMSHACKLE MIAMI HOME

Advertisement

In the reinstatement petition, Levitt attributed the missed filings to what he described as an administrative misunderstanding over whether the foundation had successfully relocated from California to Florida.

He wrote that, during the tenure of the foundation’s «former president,» who served through the end of 2025, foundation leaders believed Arc was no longer subject to California’s charitable registration requirements because it had moved to Florida.

The petition says the foundation later appointed a «new president,» who discovered the compliance problems in 2026 and began the process of bringing the organization back into compliance. The petition also states that the foundation’s directors and officers personally paid the penalty portion of the overdue filing fees.

Advertisement

The filings identify Maya Danaher, Benjamin’s daughter, as president of the California foundation. Danaher previously served as the foundation’s treasurer before becoming president.

«As previously reported, I have resigned from the foundation’s board, and its new management will set its own funding priorities going forward,» Benjamin said.

LAWMAKERS SAY THEY ARE STANDING AT THE GATES AGAINST ‘TROJAN HORSES’ PROMOTING MALIGN FOREIGN INTERESTS

Advertisement

It is unclear why Benjamin resigned from the board, why the proposed move to Florida was ultimately abandoned or why the foundation’s new leadership decided to shift its grantmaking priorities away from the causes it had supported for more than two decades.

Benjamin was not listed as an officer or director of the Florida corporation, where Barry was listed as secretary and registered agent.

Its stated goal is blunt: «WE ARE HERE TO SUPPORT SOCIAL JUSTICE NON PROFITS,» according to the articles of incorporation.

Advertisement

Levitt said the foundation’s new leadership intends to shift its grantmaking away from the causes it historically supported.

«Going forward, the foundation’s new management intends to focus its grant-making on domestic childhood enrichment programs and organizations that support the well-being of children, families and individuals in need throughout the U.S.,» Levitt said.

WATCH: Cuba expert says CodePink acts like a ‘Trojan horse’ for communist interests inside the US

Advertisement

investigations, charity, politics, us protests, china, cuba, immigration

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Massive 7.6 magnitude earthquake strikes Panama as officials investigate potential tsunami threat

Published

on



NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A powerful 7.6 magnitude earthquake struck off Panama’s southern coast Friday, shaking the country’s capital as officials investigated a potential tsunami threat. 

Advertisement

The U.S. Geological Survey initially measured the earthquake at magnitude 8.0 before lowering its estimate to 7.6. The quake struck at 1:56 p.m. ET, approximately 6 miles beneath the surface, near Pitaloza Arriba, Panama.

This is a developing story; check back later for updates.

Advertisement



earthquakes, tsunami, world, natural disasters

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Marco Rubio announces sweeping financial sanctions against the International Criminal Court

Published

on



Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Friday that the Trump administration is imposing sweeping financial sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC), a body the president has sought to dismantle throughout his second term.

To date, the administration has sanctioned 17 individuals with ties to the ICC, including judges and prosecutors. The latest move marks the first time the U.S. has gone after the institution itself.

Advertisement

«Our message is clear: The United States and the American people are not subject to the jurisdiction of this fake ICC,» Rubio said in a pre-recorded video message released Friday morning. «Both parties agree on this, but only President Trump has the resolve to take the action needed to end this threat once and for all.»

This comes hours after this year’s Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Navanethem «Navi» Pillay, a former ICC judge.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SANCTIONS SITTING PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT FOR ‘ABUSES OF POWER’

Advertisement

In a statement Friday, the Netherlands-based court strongly condemned the U.S. sanctions as «an assault on the rule of law and on the very foundations of the international legal order.»

«This measure targets an independent judicial institution, created by treaty and entrusted by 125 States Parties with investigating and prosecuting genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression,» the ICC added.

«It is an attempt to obstruct the course of justice and to prevent the Court from doing what it was created to do.»

Advertisement

ICC President Tomoko Akane, who was personally sanctioned by the Trump administration in August, said the court will continue to operate despite the new penalties.

In announcing the sanctions, Rubio argued the ICC believes it has the authority to prosecute American service members operating overseas and even U.S. Border Patrol agents. There is no evidence the court has sought to investigate or prosecute Border Patrol agents, though Rubio previously raised that possibility in July.

WORLD COURT PROSECUTOR WHO WENT AFTER NETANYAHU FOR WAR CRIMES SUSPENDED OVER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT

Advertisement

The administration’s concerns about U.S. personnel are not entirely hypothetical. In 2017, an ICC prosecutor sought authorization to investigate alleged war crimes committed by U.S. military and intelligence personnel in Afghanistan.

ICC judges initially rejected the request, but that decision was overturned on appeal in 2020, allowing the investigation to proceed. The court’s prosecutor later de-prioritized alleged crimes involving U.S. personnel to focus on alleged crimes committed by the Taliban and ISIS-K.

Under the new sanctions, any ICC assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction will be frozen, while Americans, U.S. businesses and banks are generally barred from conducting transactions with the court.

Advertisement

The sanctions will not go into effect immediately. The Treasury Department has given the ICC a 180-day general license to maintain its operations, giving the court time to address U.S. concerns.

ICC TURNS ‘BLIND EYE’ TO TOP WORLD THREATS WHILE TARGETING AMERICANS, TRUMP ADMIN SAYS

«Either the ICC will end its threats, or we will end the ICC. And we expect our allies, many of whom are part of the ICC and that rely on American service members for their defense, to rein in this rogue court,» Rubio said.

Advertisement

«If they do not, the United States will continue its campaign to dismantle the ICC piece by piece until Americans are threatened no longer.»

One of the other major grievances the administration has with the ICC is its decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in 2024.

The ICC argued both officials were responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity against Palestinians in Gaza during Israel’s military response to the Hamas-led Oct. 7 terrorist attacks in 2023. Both men have denied wrongdoing.

Advertisement

In a February 2025 executive order authorizing sanctions against ICC officials, President Donald Trump called the arrest warrants «baseless» and said the court overstepped its authority since Israel was not an ICC member.

The ICC maintains that it can exercise jurisdiction over nationals of non-member states when they are accused of qualifying crimes committed on the territory of a state that has accepted the court’s jurisdiction.

sanctions, world, foreign policy, international law, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Conciliaciones entre comercios y consumidores resuelven reclamos por más de $12.5 millones en Panamá

Published

on



La Autoridad de Protección al Consumidor y Defensa de la Competencia (Acodeco) impulsa la conciliación como una vía para resolver diferencias entre consumidores y comercios sin extender los conflictos hacia instancias más complejas.

Durante el periodo de enero a agosto de este año, la institución de protección al consumidor registró 1.332 conciliaciones entre clientes y agentes económicos.

Advertisement

Los acuerdos alcanzados involucraron un total de $12.539.194,52.

Estos resultados reflejan que muchas reclamaciones pueden resolverse cuando las empresas escuchan el planteamiento de sus clientes, revisan cada caso y ofrecen una respuesta dentro de sus posibilidades, según la entidad.

La conciliación permite que consumidores y comercios busquen un entendimiento para atender desacuerdos vinculados con compras, servicios u otras relaciones de consumo.

Advertisement

Un comerciante entrega la factura de compra a una cliente en el mostrador de un establecimiento comercial junto a un cartel sobre derechos de consumo. (Imagen Ilustrativa Infobae)

Cuando existe disposición de ambas partes, el proceso puede evitar mayores trámites, costos y demoras.

La institución señaló que una atención responsable también ayuda a preservar la confianza entre quienes venden un producto o servicio y quienes lo adquieren.

Alega que una respuesta oportuna puede impedir que un reclamo sencillo se transforme en una disputa prolongada.

Advertisement

Para la Autoridad de Protección al Consumidor y Defensa de la Competencia, la voluntad de diálogo por parte de los agentes económicos forma parte de la protección efectiva de los derechos de los consumidores.

Sostiene que la resolución de un problema no depende únicamente de la intervención institucional, sino también de la actitud que adopte el comercio frente a la situación planteada.

Un hombre mayor examina una caja de producto mientras se ajusta los anteojos en un pasillo de supermercado, con estantes llenos de artículos. (Imagen Ilustrativa Infobae)

La entidad recomendó a los consumidores conservar las facturas, los comprobantes de pago, los contratos, las garantías y otros documentos relacionados con sus adquisiciones.

Advertisement

Estos respaldos son necesarios para sustentar una reclamación y facilitar la intervención de la institución cuando sea requerida.

Voceros de la Autoridad de Protección al Consumidor y Defensa de la Competencia manifiestan que continuarán promoviendo relaciones de consumo en las que consumidores y agentes económicos conozcan sus derechos y obligaciones.

Atender un inconveniente cuando existe una solución posible constituye una forma de prevenir conflictos y proteger a ambas partes, aduce la Autoridad de Protección al Consumidor y Defensa de la Competencia.

Advertisement

Durante las actividades que realiza se explica a los proveedores cuáles son sus principales responsabilidades frente a los consumidores, haciendo énfasis en aspectos como precios visibles, información clara y veraz, garantías, condiciones de venta y calidad de los productos ofrecidos.

Verificadores de la institución visitan los locales comerciales, a manera de orientación. (Acodeco)

Se indica que la educación y prevención forman parte de las acciones de protección al consumidor, por lo que continuará fortaleciendo el contacto directo con los agentes económicos en las diferentes provincias del país.

Asimismo, la entidad recuerda a los consumidores que tienen derecho a recibir información clara sobre los productos y servicios que adquieren y que, ante cualquier posible incumplimiento, pueden presentar sus denuncias o quejas a través de los canales oficiales.

Advertisement

A través de sus diferentes administraciones regionales, la institución mantiene de manera permanente las jornadas de orientación y educación dirigidas a los agentes económicos, con el propósito de fortalecer el cumplimiento de las normas de protección al consumidor y prevenir situaciones que puedan generar reclamos o denuncias.

Entre los temas abordados se destaca la necesidad de mantener los precios de los productos claramente visibles para los consumidores, revisar periódicamente las fechas de vencimiento, garantizar el correcto funcionamiento y mantenimiento de las balanzas, cumplir con las garantías ofrecidas y respetar las demás disposiciones establecidas en la legislación de protección al consumidor.

Como parte de estas acciones preventivas, verificadores de la entidad visitaron en la provincia de Coclé 50 locales comerciales, ubicados en El Copé (27) y Río Grande (23). Durante estas visitas se informó que se brindó orientación a los responsables de los establecimientos sobre aspectos fundamentales de sus obligaciones como proveedores.

Advertisement

factura,comercio minorista,caja registradora,derechos del consumidor

Continue Reading

Tendencias