Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Iranians speak out over possible Trump-regime deal

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Amid President Donald Trump’s Monday announcement that a deal with Iran’s clerical regime is imminent to re-open the Strait of Hormuz and negotiate an end to Tehran’s illicit nuclear weapons program, Iranians who hoped U.S. pressure would force a decisive outcome now fear it may survive while ordinary people absorb the costs.

Advertisement

«Inside Iran, the mood has shifted from early-war optimism to a kind of exhausted resignation, but there is still some hope that this is the moment President Trump will use his leverage to do the right thing. The Iranian people understand this unusually narrow but strategic window,» Lisa Daftari, editor-in-chief of The Foreign Desk who keeps in contact with Iranians on the ground, told Fox News Digital.

She continued that ,»The regime is fiscally strained and politically brittle, while the broader population has been disillusioned by years of repression and economic collapse. Iranians do see this as a one‑time opportunity for Washington — and President Trump in particular — to translate military and economic leverage into the potential collapse of an irrefromable regime. If the outcome is a shallow agreement that props up the system without changing its trajectory, that window will likely close for years.»

TRUMP’S LEADERSHIP CREATES ‘RARE OPPORTUNITY’ FOR CHANGE IN IRAN, FORMER IRANIAN POLITICAL PRISONER SAYS

Advertisement

An Iranian flag is placed amid rubble next to a destroyed residential building near Ferdowsi Square in Tehran on March 3, 2026. (ATTA KENARE / AFP via Getty Images)

She continued, «If instead, the U.S. holds firm on sanctions and nuclear red lines, it can weaken the regime’s hand without punishing the Iranian people, who have already paid the highest price.»

Daftari, the Iran expert, shared recent correspondence from two Iranians from Tabriz and Tehran.

Advertisement

The resident from Tabriz said, «From my perspective, decades of political tension between Iran and the United States have had their greatest impact on ordinary people rather than those in power. Many families feel their voices are not being heard in international discussions about Iran.» Adding, «I respectfully ask whether you might consider sharing or highlighting the human side of this situation, so that the experiences of ordinary Iranian families are not overlooked in political discussions and media coverage.»

The Tehran resident said, «Today, the people of Iran believe in the future. On days when economic pressure makes the faces of the Iranian people sad, the word ‘unity’ brings a smile to their lips. Our situation is not good, but we are motivated.»

Fox News Digital surveyed a few Iranians and agreed to use only their first names because the clerical regime has declared the use of Starlink to bypass the censor a criminal act. A sophisticated clandestine network has managed to smuggle some satellite internet technology into Iran to allow people to communicate with the world outside the Islamist state.

Advertisement
Iran police.

Two armed members of Iran’s police special forces stand behind a country flag placed on an armored military vehicle during a pro-Government rally in downtown Tehran, Iran. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Hassan, who lives in Tehran, pleaded with President Trump to keep strong in his dealings with the regime, saying that «Things have gotten so bad that even if you wanted to give up and leave Iran and just focus on your own life and work, it feels like there’s nowhere left to turn. Mr. Trump, through these deals and arrangements, has left people feeling trapped, with no road left open.»

Mehdi, who resides in Tehran, expressed confusion about the existence of an agreement. He said, «So what exactly are they agreeing on? Are they saying they’re close to a deal or are there other discussions too? Every minute there is a new piece of news, everyone has a new analysis, everything changes every minute. It’s strange. This war achieved nothing. We’re the only ones left paying the price,» he complained.

THE WAR HITS HOME: WHY FINANCIAL PAIN AND ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY THREATEN TRUMP’S DRIVE TO TOPPLE IRAN’S REGIME

Advertisement

Hassan from Tehran said that «Mr. Trump, if until yesterday most Iranians thought they were on the same path as America, you caused them all to become disappointed. «Mr. Trump, if you wanted this government to remain in power, why did you blow up factories? Now workers are being laid off, and inflation is out of control. Even with a salary of 18 million tomans, you cannot feed yourself.»

Mahsa, from the Caspian Sea city of Rasht, told Fox News Digital that the system [Islamic Republic of Iran] is still fully intact. They don’t care how many people died. If anything, they seem more emboldened now and even take pride in martyrdom. Yesterday I argued with a regime supporter [who] said: «Our leader didn’t give away a single meter of land, didn’t take a step backward, unlike previous kings who gave away Bahrain, Baku, Nakhchivan, and others.»

Protesters blocking a street during a demonstration in Tehran

Protesters block a street as a crowd gathers during a demonstration in Tehran, Iran, on Jan. 9, 2026. (Mahsa/Middle East Images/AFP)

The concerns among many Iranians revolve around the proposed memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran’s regime. The MOU does not address the overthrow of the clerical regime or human rights violations, according to media reports.  Large numbers of Iranians within Iran and among the Iranian diaspora want the Trump administration to topple the Islamist dictatorship in Tehran.

Advertisement

The MOU reportedly involves a 60-day ceasefire extension. Israel and the U.S. launched a joint attack on Iran on February 28. The MOU would also see the reopening the Strait of Hormuz and new talks over Iran’s illicit nuclear weapons program.

The leaked elements of the MOU have not been confirmed by the Trump administration.

When asked about the concern among Iranians about a deal with the Islamic Republic, Anna Kelly, a spokeswoman for the White House, told Fox News Digital that «For 47 years, American Presidents and countless other world leaders talked about the threat posed by Iran, but no one had the courage to address it. President Trump took decisive action to ensure that Iran could never harm our homeland, our troops, or our allies again. Once Iran’s nuclear threat is removed for good, the entire region and its people will be safer and more stable.»

Advertisement

IRAN REGIME ESCALATES REPRESSION TOWARD ‘NORTH KOREA-STYLE MODEL OF ISOLATION AND CONTROL’

Protesters marching in downtown Tehran, Iran

Protesters march in downtown Tehran, Iran, on Dec. 29, 2025. (Fars News Agency/AP)

However, Trump said last week during his cabinet meeting, «We didn’t set out for regime change,» adding, «But by the fact that we’re dealing with a totally different group of people than we were at the beginning … This is regime change.»

Reza Farnood, an Iranian American who supports the Trump administration and is a researcher, writer and activist, urged that President Trump continue with his maximum pressure campaign against Tehran.

Advertisement

Farnood told Fox News Digital, «We welcome the bombing and attacking the regime because we are aiming to overthrow the regime.» He urged that Trump continue the blockade of Iran’s vessels and deny money to the regime. He said sanctions relief will be used by Iran «against the U.S. and Israel and their allies and innocent Iranians.»

Farnood stressed that the clerical regime is holding the Iranian people «hostage.»

Kianoosh, who lives in the northern city of Karaj, the capital of  Alborz province, said about Trump’s proposed deal: «You threw six months of our lives into hell. What answer are «you going to give to the mothers of all those children who were killed? Why did you give people false hope? Why did you hand down a death sentence to everything so many people believed in?»

Advertisement

Leading U.S. Senators well-versed in foreign policy have praised Trump’s approach to the Islamic Republic. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC., recently told Fox News’ Sean Hannity «On Trump’s watch, they’re [Iran’s regime] becoming poorer and weaker. That’s the difference.»

TRUMP’S ‘ECONOMIC FURY’ SQUEEZES IRAN — BUT CAN TEHRAN OUTLAST THE PRESSURE?

Graham juxtaposed Trump’s Iran policy with his predecessors. «Obama and Biden screwed Iran up, and Donald Trump is fixing it. On Obama and Biden’s watch, Iran became rich and lethal,» he said. «On Trump’s watch, they’re becoming poorer and weaker. That’s the difference.»

Advertisement

Iran is running dangerously low on oil storage capacity and could face a severe economic breaking point if forced to halt production, former U.S. Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette recently told Fox News.

Trump has said that Iran’s regime murdered as many as 45,000 Iranian demonstrators in January 2026. He urged just days after the mass murder that protesters keep going and promised them that «help is on its way.»

Lawdan Bazargan, a prominent Iranian-American activist who the regime imprisoned in its infamous Evin Prison in Tehran in the 1980s for political dissent, told Fox News Digital that the Iranians she’s spoken with are discouraged by Trump’s dealings. «He was one of the few world leaders who repeatedly spoke about the thousands of Iranians killed in January 2026 and expressed disgust at the sheer brutality of the Islamic Republic. He had promised support for the Iranian people and raised expectations that meaningful change might finally come.»

Advertisement
Iranians attending an anti-government protest in Tehran, Iran

Iranians attend an anti-government protest in Tehran, Iran, on Jan. 9, 2026. (UGC via AP)

She continued: «Now, 88 days later, many people feel they are left facing the same regime, one that appears more emboldened, more ideological, and still willing to repress, execute, and arrest people. The economy has been devastated, and many feel trapped between a government with no mercy and a future with no clear path forward.

For years, 90 million Iranians have lived as hostages of the Islamic Republic. Now, many fear that the consequences no longer stop at Iran’s borders, through threats to global energy routes, regional stability, and even digital infrastructure.»

According to Bazargan, «The question many ordinary Iranians are asking is simple: How are people expected to fight a system that feels victorious, controls the weapons, controls the narrative through a massive propaganda machine, and possesses countless tools of repression?»

Advertisement
Billboard showing Iran's supreme leaders Ruhollah Khomeini, Ali Khamenei, and Mojtaba Khamenei above a highway in Tehran

A billboard in Tehran displays Iran’s supreme leaders since 1979: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, who was appointed supreme leader on March 9, 2026. (AFP/Via Getty Images)

Ali, who is also from the sprawling capital city of Tehran, complained about the spiraling prices and inflation and disappointment that the regime is still in place.

«For a government with state-provided housing and billions in patronage and privileges, what difference did any of this make for its supporters?»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Ali added: «We’re the ones who are paying the price and getting crushed. How are our children ever supposed to afford these housing and car prices, and how are they supposed to get married?»

The U.S. State Department referred Fox News Digital to the White House for a comment.

Advertisement



war with iran, iran, sanctions, terrorism, national security

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Suspect ‘neutralized’ after Montreal shooting leaves at least 2 dead including officer

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A gunman was «neutralized» Monday following a shooting in Montreal that left one police officer and one other person dead. 

Advertisement

Authorities told Fox News that the shooting happened in the Côte-des-Neiges neighborhood of the city.

NYPD RELEASES DRAMATIC BODY CAM FOOTAGE OF OFFICERS TACKLING ALLEGED TEEN GUNMAN IN BROOKLYN CHASE

A shooting in Montreal left one person dead Monday, as well as a police officer, authorities said.  (Getty Images)

Advertisement

At a news conference, Montreal police (Service de police de la Ville de Montréal) Chief Fady Dagher said officers were called to the Hilton Garden Inn where someone opened fire on them, he said. 

A male officer and a civilian died, he said. A female officer was injured and taken to a hospital in critical condition but was upgraded to stable condition. 

«It’s a tragedy. It’s a nightmare,» Dagher said. 

Advertisement

The weapon used in the shooting was recovered, the chief said. 

In an alert, issued around 12:30 p.m., authorities advised people in the Côte-des-Neiges area to shelter indoors because of an «armed and dangerous suspect» in the neighborhood. 

«If you are in the affected area, shelter indoors, lock the doors, stay away from windows and follow instructions of local authorities,» the alert stated. 

Advertisement

Montreal Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada reacted to the shooting online. 

TRANSGENDER STUDENT IDENTIFIED AS ALLEGED SUSPECT IN CANADA SCHOOL MASS SHOOTING THAT LEFT AT LEAST 9 DEAD

Montreal Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada

Montreal Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada leaves a caucus meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. (Reuters)

«My deepest condolences to the family, loved ones, and colleagues of the police officer who died in the line of duty in Côte-des-Neiges,» she wrote. «My thoughts are also with all those affected by this tragedy. We are closely following the evolution of the situation and ask the public to respect the instructions of the SPVM.»

Advertisement

In a post on X, Quebec Premier Christine Fréchette said she was «deeply shaken» by the shooting and that the provincial government would offer its full co-operation to the relevant authorities. 

«Such acts have no place here. We are monitoring the situation closely,» Fréchette said. 

Details about the alleged gunman or what led to the shooting have not been disclosed. 

Advertisement

It has been 24 years since the last (SPVM) officer was killed in the line of duty, Dagher said.

Brandon Elkaim, who lives near where the shooting happened, said he was shocked to learn of the violence in the area. 

Skyline of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

A shooting in Montreal, Quebec, Canada left a police officer dead, as well as one other person, authorities said Monday.  (Photographer: Nasuna Stuart-Ulin/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«It was about 10 or 12, what we now know, were shots in a row,» he told CTV News. «About 10 minutes went by of quiet but in that time, we saw the park completely empty out, parents and kids running in a panic.»

As of Monday afternoon, there was no immediate threat to the public, authorities said. 



crime, canada, police and law enforcement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

«El mundo está seguro»: cómo Andy Burnham heredó el poder en el Reino Unido en solo veinte minutos

Published

on


El régimen de transferencia de liderazgo en el sistema político británico es brutal: «a rey muerto, rey puesto».

El primer ministro laborista y exprocurador de la Corona, Sir Keir Starmer, renunció a su cargo este lunes ante la aclamación de 100 diputados de su partido para que lo hiciera. Andy Burnham, actual diputado y alcalde de Manchester, anunció su candidatura para reemplazarlo veinte minutos después.

Advertisement

El ascenso de Andy Burnham

Andy Burnham, que ganó su cargo de diputado en Makerfield días atrás, tomó un tren de Manchester a Londres junto a Frankie, su esposa holandesa, con una pequeña valija. Una nueva vida se iniciaba para ellos.

Se cambió la remera negra por un traje azul en el tren, se tomó un democrático taxi negro desde la estación de Euston y llegó a la Cámara de los Comunes, junto a su esposa y su hija, para jurar como diputado.

Advertisement

Una ovación recibió al nuevo diputado en un clima de alegría entre los legisladores. «¡El mundo está seguro!», gritó un diputado entre las risas de todos. Andy Burnham está familiarizado con la Cámara de los Comunes: ya había sido legislador antes. Cuando firmó, dijo, ante la risa general: «Un chico travieso». Juró por el rey y sus herederos.

Más que un desafío parlamentario, probablemente Burnham llegue a 10 Downing Street por «coronación» de sus pares y sin votación. En un mes podría ser el nuevo primer ministro británico, o seguro antes de septiembre. No va a tener contrincante.

Streeting renunció a desafiarlo

Advertisement

Wes Streeting, que renunció como secretario de Salud de Starmer, apoya a Burnham para líder laborista. Confirmó que no se presentará contra Burnham para el liderazgo del partido, a pesar de haber declarado previamente que se postularía como candidato en cualquier contienda.

Esto significa que Burnham probablemente tendrá vía libre para alcanzar el liderazgo sin contienda.

Andy Burnham toma una selfie junto a sus pares en el Parlamento. Foto: AP

«Andy ha demostrado lo que el Partido Laborista puede ser cuando somos inclusivos, estamos unidos y conectados con la vida de las personas a las que este partido se fundó para representar», dijo Streeting.

Diplomacia interpares

Advertisement

La pelea de Burnham para llegar a Downing Street fue sin cuartel. Uno a uno, los diputados y hasta los ministros le pedían a Starmer que se fuera. Hasta se lo dijo su canciller, Yvette Cooper. Pero después llegó esa diplomacia tan británica de las peores horas.

«Keir ha prestado un enorme servicio a nuestro país y quiero agradecerle su liderazgo y dedicación durante este período tan difícil. Su decisión marca el inicio de una transición, y es importante que este proceso se lleve a cabo de forma ordenada y responsable. Me presentaré como candidato para este proceso», confirmó Andy Burnham a la hora de la despedida.

¿Un liderazgo de izquierda?

Advertisement

Burnham declaró que las prioridades del Partido Laborista deberían ser «el progreso en el crecimiento económico, el costo de vida, los servicios públicos, la vivienda y las oportunidades para la próxima generación».

La gente reacciona al ver llegar al nuevo diputado Andy Burnham, en Westminster. Foto: Reuters

El Partido Laborista está preocupado por el avance de la ultraderecha en el reino, por Reform y Nigel Farage.

Las posiciones que Sir Keir Starmer, un exprocurador de la Corona que llegó a la política a los 50 años, adoptaba eran tibias, sin rumbo. Con muchos errores, incluida la nominación del exembajador en Estados Unidos, Peter Mandelson, y su detención posterior por la policía por el caso Epstein, que no contribuían a encontrar una línea firme. El costo de vida se volvió imposible y el populismo de Farage crece y se vuelve un peligro si hay elecciones generales anticipadas.

Por eso, los laboristas y los diputados buscan un liderazgo de izquierda, que creen haber encontrado en Andy Burnham. Pero los que lo conocen a este exministro de Salud blairista, graduado en Cambridge y católico, saben que es un moderado. Un pragmático socialdemócrata, más blairista que cercano a las ideas del «muro rojo» laborista, que en el norte del reino votó a favor del Brexit y con los conservadores. Pero es popular, muy político y tiene años de terreno en campaña.

Advertisement

Starmer, muy emocionado

La despedida de Sir Keir Starmer fue breve, emotiva y dolorosa. En un podio frente a la puerta negra de 10 Downing Street, muy emocionado, sintetizó su trabajo y agradeció, con lágrimas en los ojos, a Victoria, su esposa, y a sus hijos. Con todos ellos, en familia, tomó la decisión, el domingo, de renunciar en Chequers, la casa de campo oficial.

Keir Starmer se abraza a su esposa Victoria. Foto: AP

«La pregunta que se plantea ahora mi partido es si soy la persona idónea para liderarlos en las próximas elecciones generales. He escuchado la respuesta de mi grupo parlamentario a esa pregunta y la acepto con humildad», dijo.

«Cada decisión que he tomado ha tenido como prioridad el bienestar del país que amo. Por eso, renunciaré a mi cargo como líder del Partido Laborista«, dijo frente a un podio. «Esta mañana hablé con Su Majestad el Rey para informarle de mi decisión», añadió.

Advertisement

Aseguró que esto garantizará que haya un nuevo líder laborista para cuando el Parlamento reanude sus sesiones en septiembre.

La primera parte del discurso, en la que Starmer expuso sus logros durante su mandato, quedó casi ahogada por la Oda a la Alegría, que sonaba a todo volumen desde el enorme altavoz, propiedad del activista Steve Bray.

Pero, de repente, se hizo el silencio. Starmer expuso sus planes de dimisión y se emocionó al agradecer a sus colegas, y también a Victoria, su esposa, y a sus dos hijos adolescentes.

Advertisement
Keir Starmer y su esposa regresan al interior de Downing St. tras anunciar la renuncia. Foto: AP

Hasta el presidente Donald Trump anunció anoche que Sir Keir Starmer renunciaría hoy. Habían tenido horrendas relaciones porque Starmer, abogado al fin, se negaba a participar en una guerra ilegal como la de Irán o a dejar usar sus bases a los aviones norteamericanos o a ayudar a abrir el estrecho de Ormuz.

Nunca le había pasado a un presidente norteamericano tal situación, cuando el país tiene una relación transatlántica privilegiada con el reino. Ni la visita del rey Carlos a la Casa Blanca pudo reparar el vínculo entre Trump y Starmer.

Reacciones

Las primeras reacciones por la renuncia de Starmer ya se conocen. David Lammy, su ex canciller y secretario de Estado de Justicia, afirmó que el líder laborista se ha guiado por un profundo sentido del servicio público y del deber hacia este país.

Advertisement

«Conozco a Keir desde que era abogado. Era un hombre de principios entonces, igual que lo es ahora», dijo el viceprimer ministro.

Starmer «devolvió la estabilidad a nuestra economía», «redujo las listas de espera del NHS» y «volvió a colocar a Gran Bretaña en el centro de Europa», dijo Lammy, que también fue su canciller.

«Cambio prometido, cambio luchado y cambio logrado. Ese es el legado de Keir Starmer, y me siento increíblemente orgulloso de haber contribuido», escribió en X.

Advertisement

El secretario jefe de Starmer, Darren Jones, afirmó sentirse «orgulloso» de estar a su lado en Downing Street. Jones declaró que Starmer rescató al Partido Laborista «del borde del abismo y lo llevó al gobierno hace dos años». Advirtió que «no debe olvidar las lecciones de nuestras sucesivas derrotas».

«Pase lo que pase, podemos estar agradecidos por el liderazgo de Keir Starmer y el trabajo que su gobierno ha realizado para encaminar a Gran Bretaña hacia un futuro mejor», concluyó.

Lucy Powell, la vicepresidenta del Partido Laborista, afirmó que su partido le debe «muchísimo» a Sir Keir Starmer tras su anuncio de renuncia como líder laborista y primer ministro.

Advertisement

Starmer «nos devolvió la posibilidad de ser elegidos y nos llevó a una victoria electoral aplastante hace tan solo dos años». «Ha supervisado importantes logros desde entonces», dijo. Starmer «ama a su país» y tiene un «profundo sentido del servicio público y del deber».

Powell añadió que Starmer «anunció su dimisión con dignidad». Instó a su partido a «unirse» y «demostrar al país que podemos llevar a cabo una transición ordenada y exitosa».

«Debemos demostrar que la política progresista tradicional puede mejorar la vida de las personas y está a la altura de los desafíos que todos enfrentamos. Si fracasamos, las consecuencias para la democracia y el país serán graves y peligrosas», anunció Lady Powell.

Advertisement

La reacción de Nigel Farage

El líder del populista Partido Reformista del Reino Unido, Nigel Farage, afirmó que Sir Keir Starmer ha «fracasado» como primer ministro.

Dijo que la ciudadanía estará «molesta porque la mayoría de las medidas adoptadas por este gobierno laborista ni siquiera figuraban en su programa electoral de 2024».

Advertisement

Sin embargo, Farage expresa cierta comprensión hacia Starmer, afirmando que, «a nivel humano», lo lamentaba. «Se le veía claramente muy emocionado al final», comentó. «¿Y a quién le sorprende? Porque debe ser el trabajo más absorbente del mundo«.

Consideró «terrible» que el «momento histórico» de la dimisión de Starmer se viera empañado por manifestantes que ponían música a todo volumen frente a Downing Street.

El líder del Partido Reformista también instó a Andy Burnham, si llega a ser primer ministro, a convocar elecciones generales, dado que Burnham «ni siquiera se presentó a las elecciones anteriores».

Advertisement

La herencia

La canciller de las Finanzas de Starmer, Rachel Reeves, afirmó que «queda mucho por hacer», tras el anuncio de la dimisión de Sir Keir Starmer, dando a entender que desea que sus planes económicos continúen bajo un nuevo líder laborista. Se desconoce si Reeves permanecerá en el cargo de ministra de Hacienda.

«Hemos logrado mucho juntos. Hay mucho de qué enorgullecerse, y aún queda mucho por hacer. Agradezco el liderazgo de Keir y el trabajo que ha realizado para construir una Gran Bretaña más fuerte y segura», afirmó la canciller.

Advertisement

Elogiando al actual primer ministro, declaró: «Tras la peor derrota de la historia moderna de nuestro partido, Keir Starmer logró darle la vuelta a la situación y conseguir una aplastante mayoría tan solo cuatro años después».

Sir Keir Starmer, abogado de derechos humanos, millonario, ético, casi solemne, no brindó al laborismo los cambios en los que él no creía, cuando la ultraderecha apremia en Gran Bretaña.

Consiguió muchos cambios, pero no fue el cambio que su partido deseaba, ni tampoco el Partido Laborista renovado que se le prometió al público hace dos años.

Advertisement

Construyó un gobierno laborista moderado, cuyos logros fueron más modestos de lo que podrían haber sido, debido a que el primer ministro fue incapaz, y en ocasiones reacio, a imponer su voluntad, resolver disputas, tomar una postura y lograr resultados. Más que como un premier, siempre se comportó como un ecuánime procurador de la Corona.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Obama-era inspection flaws in Iran could persist as experts warn of nuclear blind spots

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran has agreed to let nuclear inspectors back into the country, Vice President JD Vance said Monday, as nuclear experts warned President Donald Trump’s new Tehran framework will only work if inspectors get the kind of unfettered access they say was missing from the Obama-era Iran deal.

Advertisement

The news, which Vance described as «a major milestone,» comes as Trump’s new Iran framework drew warnings from nuclear experts who told Fox News Digital the deal could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first locate, secure and verify the material. The IAEA has not been able to resume full in-field verification of Iran’s declared nuclear program since last year’s strikes, apart from a June inspection at a single Iranian nuclear power plant.

The verification gap concern centers on language in the reported U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding (MOU) saying the two sides will resolve the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile through a still-to-be-negotiated process. The MOU identifies onsite «downblending,» which means diluting enriched uranium so it is less usable for a nuclear weapon, under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supervision as the minimum acceptable method for dealing with the material. The MOU does not explicitly say Iran will retain a civilian nuclear program, but it says the two sides will discuss enrichment and other matters related to Iran’s «nuclear needs» in a final deal.

«Unfettered verification is everything,» Chuck DeVore, Chief National Initiatives Officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, told Fox News Digital. «There can be no denial for teams to inspect on the ground. Remote, technological means can achieve a lot, but nothing beats in-person inspections.»

Advertisement

TRUMP NUCLEAR TALKS FACE DEFINING QUESTION: WHAT HAPPENS TO IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE?

Vice President JD Vance said the Iranians have agreed to let nuclear inspectors back into their country. U.S. nuclear experts are warning that Trump’s reported Iran framework could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first fully account for and secure the material. (Photo by Spencer Platt / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

IAEA supervision would only be meaningful if inspectors first regain enough access to fully account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and ensure Tehran does not retain unchecked control of the material, experts warned Fox News Digital. Meanwhile, a recent IAEA report released this month underscored the agency’s limited visibility into Iran’s declared nuclear program after last year’s military strikes, saying that aside from a single inspection at an Iranian nuclear power plant, the agency «has not received information from Iran» about the status of its other declared nuclear facilities or associated nuclear material. «Nor has the Agency had access» to those sites for in-field verification, the report noted.

Advertisement

A senior administration official told Fox News Digital on background that the MOU required Iran’s regime to reaffirm that it will not procure or develop nuclear weapons, calling that a critical first step under Iran’s new Supreme Leader.

The official said the U.S. has reached understandings with Iran when it comes to its uranium stockpile, and the new deal is the first step of turning these understandings into real results, which include progress on enriched uranium stockpiles, dismantlement of nuclear sites, an enrichment ban and inspection access. The official added that the U.S. has already had productive discussions with Iran on those issues and, now that the MOU is formally in place, negotiators will work to make quick progress.

US-IRAN TALKS POSTPONED IN SWITZERLAND AMID ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH TENSIONS; HORMUZ REMAINS A KEY ISSUE

Advertisement

The official also referred Fox News Digital to comments Vice President JD Vance made Thursday, when he said the deal’s benefits depend on Iran following through on its promises.

«They have promised not to enrich. They have promised that they would allow inspectors in to destroy that highly enriched stockpile. And then, of course, it’s not usable anymore. You take it somewhere else,» Vance said. «They promised a number of things, and that’s why the deal contemplates a number of benefits if they do those things. But it doesn’t do anything if they don’t actually meet those promises.»

Vice President JD Vance listens during press briefing

Vice President JD Vance listens as a reporter asks a question in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Thursday, June 18, 2026, in Washington. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

«The Iranians have agreed to invite IAEA inspectors back into their country. That is a major milestone for the American people, and the first step in permanently denuclearize, easing or permanently ending a nuclear weapons program in Iran,» Vance added Monday after negotiations in Switzerland resumed. «And that’s exactly what we wanted to do. That’s exactly what we asked to happen.»

Advertisement

The Vice President said that the technical negotiations will continue over the next weeks and days, even in his absence. He said a framework for «proper political oversight» of these negotiations has been established as well. Vance simultaneously highlighted that «a lot of great progress on other nuclear talks» has already been made in the early days. 

Andrea Stricker, deputy director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Nonproliferation Program, told Fox News Digital that any credible agreement must begin with recovering and safeguarding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, and not allowing Tehran to keep control of the material while it is diluted inside the country.

«Without verifiably dismantling and destroying all of Iran’s fundamental nuclear capabilities — nuclear material, facilities, centrifuges, manufacturing capabilities, equipment, documentation, and weaponization capacities, and ensuring scientists are redirected to civilian work — Iran’s pledge on paper is meaningless,» she told Fox News Digital, noting that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile could, if recovered and further enriched, provide enough weapons-grade material for roughly 22 nuclear weapons.

Advertisement

HOW DOES TRUMP SOLVE KEY ‘NUCLEAR DUST’ HANG-UP IN NEGOTIATIONS TO END IRAN WAR?

DeVore was more cautious about assigning a single number to Iran’s potential weapons capacity, saying the estimate depends heavily on the sophistication of the weapon design. He said the same stockpile could translate into fewer basic weapons or be stretched further by a more advanced nuclear program.

He said onsite downblending, if properly verified, would be aimed at making Iran’s roughly 1,000 pounds of 60% enriched uranium unavailable for further enrichment. DeVore cautioned that the material would still need additional processing to be turned into weapons-grade uranium and said he does not believe Tehran can currently do that because key facilities were destroyed in last year’s strikes.

Advertisement
Satellite image showing damage at the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran

A satellite image shows damage at the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran after U.S. strikes on June 22, 2025. (Maxar Technologies)

Asked what would be needed to make any Iran deal enforceable, DeVore told Fox News Digital the U.S. must avoid repeating what he described as a key weakness of the Obama-era nuclear deal: allowing Tehran to restrict access or keep certain sites off limits. He said the «ultimate question» is onsite verification, warning that Washington cannot allow itself to be pushed into «an agreement for agreement’s sake.»

TOP SENATE REPUBLICAN RIPS INTO TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL, SAYS $300B MAKES OBAMA DEAL LOOK LIKE ‘A PITTANCE’

DeVore also said the Obama-era JCPOA gave inspectors too much notice and too little freedom to inspect suspicious locations as well, arguing that any new deal must avoid a system where Iran can delay, limit or steer inspections before the IAEA gets on the ground.

Advertisement
The flag of Iran waving in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency building in Vienna

The flag of Iran waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency headquarters in Vienna, Austria. (Florian Schroetter/AP Photo)

DeVore told Fox News Digital that his concern is informed by his experience as a young special assistant for foreign affairs in the Reagan administration, when he worked on verification issues surrounding Cold War-era nuclear agreements with the Soviet Union, including the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty and the Threshold Test Ban Treaty.

In those negotiations, DeVore said, the danger was that the minimum level of verification sought by defense and intelligence officials could become the starting point for diplomats, meaning the final deal could end up below what experts believed was necessary.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Once you say, ‘This is the minimum we need,’ then that becomes the starting point, so anything agreed to is less than that,» DeVore said. «That’s what I fear.»

Fox News Digital reached out to the IAEA asking whether the agency can currently account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and whether it has any comment on the verification questions raised by the reported framework but did not hear back. The agency did not release any statement after Vance said they would be allowed access to Iran in time for publication.

war with iran, nuclear proliferation, foreign policy, middle east foreign policy, treaties, sanctions

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias