INTERNACIONAL
Rusia lanzó un nuevo ataque con misiles y drones contra varias regiones de Ucrania: al menos tres muertos

Al menos tres personas murieron en las últimas horas como consecuencia de ataques rusos contra Ucrania, entre ellas un tripulante egipcio de un buque de carga alcanzado por drones en el mar Negro, según informaron este lunes autoridades ucranianas.
Los bombardeos también causaron víctimas en las ciudades de Zaporizhzhia y Odessa, mientras Rusia reportó la interceptación de cientos de drones ucranianos y el cierre temporal de los cuatro aeropuertos de Moscú.
El viceprimer ministro ucraniano, Oleksi Kuleba, informó que un ataque con drones incendió una embarcación mercante que navegaba bajo bandera panameña en el mar Negro. “Un ataque con drones provocó un incendio en un buque que navegaba bajo bandera de Panamá. Un miembro de la tripulación murió: un cocinero de 58 años, ciudadano de Egipto”, escribió en Telegram.
Según el funcionario, otros ocho marineros abandonaron la nave en una balsa salvavidas. Entre ellos había ciudadanos de Turquía e India. Kuleba señaló que el barco “sufrió daños significativos y perdió condiciones de navegabilidad”.
La Marina ucraniana identificó la embarcación como el carguero turco Victress y precisó que el impacto provocó “un incendio de gran magnitud”.
En un comunicado difundido por Telegram, la fuerza naval sostuvo que “este incidente demuestra una vez más que la Federación Rusa continúa violando las normas del derecho marítimo internacional y representando amenazas para la navegación civil”.
Kuleba también afirmó que otras embarcaciones que navegaban bajo las banderas de Palaos y Belice fueron atacadas por fuerzas rusas, aunque en esos casos no se registraron víctimas.
En paralelo, las autoridades regionales ucranianas informaron de otras dos muertes en territorio del país.
En la región de Zaporizhzhia, en el sudeste de Ucrania, un ataque con drones destruyó viviendas y dejó víctimas civiles. El jefe de la administración militar regional, Iván Fédorov, informó inicialmente que los equipos de rescate buscaban a una mujer atrapada entre los escombros.
“Tres personas resultaron heridas y otra mujer quedó atrapada en una casa en llamas tras un ataque enemigo en Zaporiyia”, escribió el funcionario en Telegram. Horas después confirmó el fallecimiento de la víctima.
“Lamentablemente, se ha confirmado la muerte de una mujer que estaba dentro de una casa destruida por un dron enemigo”, señaló Fédorov.
En la región de Odessa, sobre la costa del mar Negro, las autoridades reportaron la muerte de una persona tras un ataque con misil contra infraestructura civil. El gobernador regional, Oleg Kiper, indicó que las fuerzas rusas lanzaron un misil balístico Iskander durante la noche del domingo contra una instalación agrícola.
Por su parte, el servicio estatal de emergencias de Ucrania informó que el ataque provocó un incendio en una empresa agrícola y dejó otras personas heridas. “Una persona murió como resultado del ataque con misiles de ayer contra infraestructura civil en la región de Odesa. Otras tres personas resultaron heridas”, señaló el organismo.

Los nuevos ataques se produjeron en medio de una intensificación de las operaciones militares entre Moscú y Kiev. Rusia mantiene bombardeos regulares sobre ciudades ucranianas desde el inicio de la invasión a gran escala en febrero de 2022, mientras Ucrania incrementó en los últimos meses sus ataques con drones contra territorio ruso.
Del lado ruso, las autoridades informaron que las defensas aéreas interceptaron una nueva oleada de aparatos no tripulados durante la noche. El Ministerio de Defensa ruso aseguró que sus sistemas antiaéreos destruyeron 301 drones ucranianos en distintas regiones del país.
Como medida de seguridad, las autoridades de aviación suspendieron temporalmente las operaciones en los cuatro aeropuertos de Moscú.
(Con información de AFP)
War,Europe,Military Conflicts
INTERNACIONAL
Trump’s fiercest GOP critic became his most influential voice on war and peace

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
In 2015, Sen. Lindsey Graham called Donald Trump a «jackass» and warned Republicans that nominating him would be a disaster. Trump responded by reading Graham’s personal cellphone number aloud during a campaign rally, encouraging supporters to call the South Carolina senator.
Few political rivalries seemed less likely to evolve into one of Washington’s most consequential foreign policy partnerships.
Trump rose to power promising to end America’s «endless wars» and challenging decades of Republican foreign policy orthodoxy. Graham, by contrast, remained throughout his three decades in public service an unabashed advocate of projecting American power abroad.
FROM ‘DISGRACE’ TO ‘FAMILY’: TRUMP’S REMARKABLE JOURNEY WITH LINDSEY GRAHAM
Yet over the next decade, Graham became one of the few lawmakers with regular access to President Trump on questions of national security, emerging as one of the Republican Party’s most influential voices on Iran, Ukraine, Israel and NATO.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, speaks with reporters aboard Air Force One with President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on the way back to Washington, D.C., on Jan. 4, 2026. (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)
He had built his Senate career around foreign policy. While many lawmakers spent weekends back home, Graham was often overseas meeting presidents, visiting war zones and trying to broker agreements between allies and the White House.
By the end of his career, his office had become an unofficial waypoint for foreign leaders trying to understand — or influence — the Trump administration.
In interviews following the senator’s sudden death Saturday, Trump described Graham as «like a member of the family» and said he was among the final people to speak with the South Carolina Republican after he returned from Ukraine just hours before his death.
As Trump reshaped Republican foreign policy around an «America First» agenda, Graham became one of the few congressional voices with regular access to the president on questions of war and peace. He frequently pressed Trump to maintain a muscular U.S. role abroad — even as the president questioned long-standing alliances and warned against prolonged military interventions.

Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham pose for a picture on a golf course June 28, 2025. (Sen. Lindsey Graham via X)
Rather than becoming another Republican hawk sidelined by Trump’s ascent, Graham cultivated one of the closest working relationships with the president, giving him unusual influence as the administration navigated conflicts from Ukraine and Iran to Israel and NATO.
Whether Graham simply reinforced Trump’s instincts — or helped shape them — may become one of the defining questions of his foreign policy legacy.
GRAHAM REPORTEDLY REFUSED MEDICAL HELP BEFORE SCHEDULED TV APPEARANCE
«He would call me all the time,» Trump told Fox News Monday. «I’d say, ‘Stop calling me, Lindsey.’ It was amazing. He just never stopped. He was a worker — a total workaholic politician.»
Colleagues said Graham lived and breathed the work of the Senate, particularly serving as an informal envoy between the U.S. and allies around the world.
In the hours before his death, Graham told a confidant he wasn’t feeling well but joked he couldn’t die now because he still had work to do. He was preparing to push a long-stalled bipartisan Russia sanctions bill through the Senate, remained focused on advancing Saudi-Israel normalization and believed the Trump administration had not yet finished confronting Iran.
He had just completed his 10th trip to Ukraine, and maintained tight relationships not only with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy but also with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Gulf leaders and others around the world.
Graham believed that influence came from showing up, according to Jack Keane, a retired Army four-star general, the chairman of the Institute for the Study of War and Fox News Senior Strategic Analyst.
«He wasn’t interested in writing op-ed pieces or making speeches, he wanted firsthand contact with leaders of the world.» Keane, who counted Graham as a friend, told Fox News Digital. «He was interested in getting the results.»
Graham, upon being beaten by Trump in the 2016 primary, conceded that the then-real estate mogul understood the American public better than he did .
«He understood the American people better than we did, and shame on us for not doing it as effectively as him,» Graham said at the time, according to Keane.
So Graham went to work making himself useful for the president.
«Graham knew the world better than almost anyone in Washington, and he likely knew many foreign leaders better than President Trump’s own appointees,» Keane said. «He made a conscious decision to help the president by offering advice and counsel, which grew into both a personal and professional relationship.»
Graham’s worldview was shaped alongside late Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., with whom he traveled extensively overseas. The trio —known as the «Three Amigos» — championed an interventionist Republican foreign policy rooted in American military leadership, support for democratic allies and confronting authoritarian adversaries.
Graham publicly disagreed with Trump over Iran negotiations — preferring strikes and regime change — and repeatedly pushed for a tougher line against Russia in the war on Ukraine.
Those convictions at times put him closer to traditional Republican foreign policy than to Trump’s «America First» instincts, even as he worked to remain one of the president’s closest advisors.
Trump’s approach to foreign policy often shifted between military confrontation and diplomatic restraint. Graham’s rarely did.

Sen. Lindsey Graham is pictured in Kyiv on June 10, one day before his passing. (Valentyn Ogirenko/Reuters)
Whenever Trump appeared to move toward a negotiated settlement with Iran, Graham followed a familiar playbook: remind the White House that Congress ultimately would have to review any lasting agreement.
After Trump announced a memorandum of understanding with Iran in June, Graham quickly argued that any lasting deal would require congressional scrutiny and even suggested Vice President JD Vance would ultimately have to defend it on Capitol Hill.
By the time of his death, Graham had fashioned exactly the role he wanted in Washington: trusted interlocutor between the White House, Congress and foreign leaders.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., described Graham as having a «kid-like exuberance about his job and the responsibilities he was given.»
«Even in his sixties he would get off a plane in a foreign land with a twinkle in his eye and look at me as if to say, can you believe we are actually here and doing this?» she wrote on X.
Very rarely in life do you get to be exactly where you want to be, when you want to be there, with who you want to be with, doing precisely what you want to do — that was every moment for Lindsey,» White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller wrote on X.
«Lindsey was a senator’s senator. The job was everything to him. Truly did he believe in the splendor of the office and the noble lineage behind it, of which he was the worthy heir.»
Graham rarely seemed interested in winning an argument if it meant losing the president. He spent more than a year revising his long-stalled Russia sanctions legislation and negotiating with the White House as Trump pursued his own diplomatic outreach to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Only days before his death did Graham announce that he had reached an agreement with the administration to move the bill forward.
While Trump frequently questioned the value of NATO and demanded allies shoulder more of the burden, Graham viewed America’s alliances as one of its greatest strategic advantages. He generally agreed that European nations needed to spend more on defense, but argued the alliance itself remained indispensable to deterring Russia and projecting American power.
Graham’s support for Israel was equally central to his worldview. He regarded Israel as America’s closest partner in the Middle East and spent years working to strengthen ties between Israel and Arab states, viewing Saudi-Israeli normalization as a historic opportunity to reshape the region while further isolating Iran.
Graham spent a decade proving that in Washington, proximity to power could matter as much as formal authority. Without Graham in Washington, Ukraine now fears it may have lost an indispensable advocate in Washington.
«Huge and absolutely unexpected loss,» said Oleksandr Merezhko, a lawmaker with Zelenskyy’s party, told the AP. «He was truly indispensable. I even don’t know who might be as important for us now in Trump’s entourage.»
«He was the closest link between Ukraine, our president and Trump,» he added. «Our position in Trump’s entourage might be weaker.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
It’s unclear who will be able to usher Graham’s signature Russia sanctions bill through the Senate and onto the president’s desk with the same access to both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
For now, the president will navigate wars in Ukraine and the Middle East without the friend who was never shy about telling him to hit harder.
lindsey graham, politics, foreign policy senate, donald trump, foreign policy
INTERNACIONAL
Francia celebra el Día de la Bastilla con un tradicional desfile militar, Zelensky como invitado de honor y un amplio respaldo a Ucrania

El presidente de Francia, Emmanuel Macron, encabeza este martes su décimo y último desfile militar por el Día de la Bastilla como jefe de Estado, con su par de Ucrania, Volodimir Zelensky, como invitado de honor y una fuerte presencia de tropas que respaldan a Kiev frente a la invasión rusa. La ceremonia también incluyó un homenaje a las víctimas del atentado terrorista de Niza, al cumplirse diez años del ataque que dejó 86 muertos.
El tradicional desfile sobre la avenida de los Campos Elíseos, que conmemora la toma de la Bastilla del 14 de julio de 1789, comenzará alrededor de las 10:00 hora local. La ceremonia reunirá a unos 500 soldados de la denominada Coalición de los Voluntarios, integrada por países que apoyan a Ucrania, además de unos 25 militares ucranianos, que desfilaron detrás de las tropas de los Estados miembros de esa alianza.
La participación de efectivos ucranianos y de países aliados se produce un día después de la reunión de los líderes de la coalición en París. Francia y el Reino Unido impulsan desde el año pasado este grupo de naciones dispuesto a participar en una eventual fuerza multinacional liderada por Europa una vez que exista un alto el fuego en Ucrania.
En la víspera del desfile, Macron pronunció su tradicional discurso ante las Fuerzas Armadas y defendió el compromiso europeo con la seguridad del continente. “El mensaje que enviamos al mundo es este: Sí, la paz es nuestro objetivo“, afirmó el mandatario.
El presidente francés agregó: «Sí, apreciamos la libertad y el Estado de derecho. Y sí, estamos preparados para luchar para defenderlos. Siempre, y al costo de sangre si fuera necesario“.
Desde el Palacio del Elíseo también destacaron el significado político del acto. Un integrante de la oficina presidencial sostuvo que el desfile representa «un poderoso símbolo de una Europa que toma conciencia de lo peligroso que es el mundo y que debe tomar su destino en sus propias manos“.
La ceremonia transcurre bajo una intensa ola de calor que afectó a gran parte de Francia. Decenas de miles de personas asistirán a las celebraciones en el centro de París, mientras un incendio forestal avanza en las afueras de la capital y las autoridades prohibieron los fuegos artificiales en varias zonas del país debido al riesgo de nuevos focos.
Además del desfile militar y del espectáculo aéreo, la jornada nacional francesa concluirá con otro acontecimiento de gran expectativa: el partido entre Francia y España por las semifinales del Mundial de fútbol. La selección francesa busca regresar a una final después de conquistar el título en 2018 y perder la definición de 2022 frente a Argentina.
Antes del encuentro deportivo, Macron dispuso realizar un minuto de silencio en memoria de las víctimas de los atentados yihadistas que golpearon al país hace una década.
El homenaje recordará el ataque ocurrido el 14 de julio de 2016 en la ciudad mediterránea de Niza, cuando un conductor embistió con un camión a la multitud que abandonaba el espectáculo de fuegos artificiales por el Día de la Bastilla. El atentado provocó 86 muertos y más de 400 heridos.
El grupo yihadista Estado Islámico reivindicó posteriormente al atacante, un ciudadano tunecino de 31 años identificado como Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel, que murió por disparos de la policía en el lugar del ataque.

El atentado de Niza ocurrió menos de un año después de los ataques coordinados del 13 de noviembre de 2015 en París y sus alrededores, que dejaron 130 muertos y constituyeron el peor ataque terrorista en tiempos de paz registrado en Francia.
La edición de este año también marca el último desfile del 14 de Julio para Macron antes del final de su segundo mandato consecutivo, el máximo permitido por la Constitución francesa. El presidente dejará el cargo el próximo año y el escenario político ya apunta a las próximas elecciones presidenciales.
En ese contexto, la líder de la derecha nacional, Marine Le Pen, mantiene su intención de competir por cuarta vez por la Presidencia, pese a una condena por malversación de fondos.
(Con información de AFP)
anniversaries,defence
INTERNACIONAL
Democratic socialists erupt over 2028 endorsement as AOC speculation grows: ‘Dangerous path’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Infighting has erupted within the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) about the selection of its pick for U.S. president, as the group’s influence continues to grow on the national stage and speculation swirls about a 2028 presidential run by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
The infighting reveals fractures in the roughly 120,000-member group, which has emerged as the preeminent socialist group in America. The division also sheds light on how some Democratic Socialists of America members believe the group can gain a permanent foothold in American politics and deliver on its socialist ideals on a national scale.
Some Democratic Socialists of America leaders have been pushing for an earlier presidential endorsement in place of the group’s normal practice of selecting endorsements at its biennial national convention, which is set for summer 2027.
One faction known as the «Groundwork» caucus is pushing strongly for the group to conduct a national member poll and «endorse AOC on day one.» The caucus believes an early endorsement will help DSA hold a more influential early role in 2028 presidential politics and «build power for socialism.»
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA LEADER SAYS ‘MANY’ IN GROUP WOULD BE ‘THRILLED’ AT AOC IN 2028
In one online petition, DSA members voiced that «if we don’t have a member poll, we as members will be left out of DSA’s most fundamental way of building a democratic strategy.»
However, in a Sunday 14–13 vote, DSA’s National Political Committee (NPC) rejected a proposal to allow the group’s 2028 presidential endorsement to be decided through a nationwide all-member poll, according to Canary Mission. By rejecting the proposal, the committee left the issue to DSA’s existing convention process, meaning any national endorsement decision would likely wait until the organization’s next convention in August 2027.
The decision was blasted by many DSA members online.
Gustavo Gordillo, co-chair of the group’s New York City chapter, posted on X that «DSA’s national leadership (the NPC) just voted to overturn our convention & took away rank and file members’ right to vote in an all-member poll on presidential endorsement.»
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., sparked rumors she is considering a run for president after posting a campaign-style video on social media. (Steven Ferdman/GC Images)
Gordillo added that the committee is «taking away our members’ right to vote» while NYC-DSA, the group’s largest chapter, is «send(ing) them ~ $2M per year in dues.»
Likewise, J. Ryder, founding editor of a magazine on communism, wrote that the committee’s decision «to suppress polling the will of the members on presidential endorsement is severely disappointing.»
Ryder added that «this will inevitably put DSA on the back foot in the 2028 moment,» writing, «Waiting to endorse in August of next year at the convention may mean 6 months+ of vital AOC campaign time where the masses will be mobilizing without intervention by DSA.»
«The worst part is, the members want to mobilize, they see the opportunity that this moment represents for socialism and want so desperately to grasp it,» he added. «The fact the (sic) some sectarians on the NPC are suppressing even a non-binding poll shows that they know this, and are scared of the implications of member democracy and mass politics in DSA.»
In response, committee member Amy Wilhelm fired back at Gordillo, posting on X that «NYC members deserve co-chairs that don’t lie.»
Wilhelm said that «there was never intention to prevent» DSA members from participating in chapter polls, and that «with the resolution where we left it today chapters are allowed to carry out the poll per their standard method.»
Likewise, another X user who goes by the name «tylerisposting» blasted Gordillo, telling him in an X post to «stop lying» and «stop trying to foment a split.»
Meanwhile, Eve Seitchik, a Massachusetts DSA member, characterized the events of the day as «a massive escalation of factional tensions,» adding, «I’m afraid DSA has been set down a dangerous path.»
SOCIALISTS LAUNCH RADICAL PLATFORM TO ABOLISH THE US SENATE IN BID TO FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA

Members of the Democratic Socialists of America gather outside of a Trump owned building during a May Day rally in New York City in 2019. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
The authors posited that DSA’s recent electoral wins and Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., «Fight Oligarchy» tour «have shown that there is energy all across the country to support a bold, democratic socialist presidential campaign.»
They argued that «DSA should be ready to position ourselves as the political home for the millions of people that will be inspired by AOC’s message and position our organization as the vital core of AOC’s campaign.»
They wrote that Ocasio-Cortez is «on the precipice of running for — and potentially winning — the presidency of the United States» and that «this opportunity is years in the making.»
«If we drag our feet,» they wrote, «we will have forced ourselves into the backseat and miss the opportunity to strike when the iron is hot.»
The four-term congresswoman has not directly said whether she will launch a presidential run in 2028. Rumors are also circulating about her opting to instead run for the Senate to topple Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
Though Ocasio-Cortez is considered one of the most prominent socialists in the country and a close ally of Sanders, she has run afoul of DSA leadership several times.
In summer 2025, the group issued a statement condemning Ocasio-Cortez’s vote against an amendment to block additional funding for Israel’s «Iron Dome,» which would have denied Israel an additional $500 million in U.S. funding for its preeminent missile defense system. In 2024, the DSA withdrew its endorsement for Ocasio-Cortez’s re-election, citing that she had not met its conditions, including opposing all funding to Israel and publicly supporting boycott and sanctions for the country.
DSA’s New York City chapter notably retained its endorsement for Ocasio-Cortez.
AOC TAKES PAGE FROM BIDEN PLAYBOOK IN DODGING INTERVIEWS WITH NATIONAL PRESS

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speak to a full auditorium as part of the «Fighting Oligarchy» tour on April 14, 2025, in Nampa, Idaho. According to event organizers, 12,500 people attended the rally. (Natalie Behring/Getty Images)
Commenting on DSA’s deliberations, a spokesperson for Canary Mission told Fox News Digital that «an AOC presidency would give that movement more than influence: it would give its agenda access to the full power of the executive branch.»
The spokesperson added that «putting that power in the hands of a movement that repeatedly places ideological allegiance above America’s national interests, regards America and its allies as the problem, and shows sympathy toward their adversaries would not be political progress. It would be a profound national-security risk—and could be devastating for the country.»
«DSA presents its agenda as a project of reconstruction, but much of its politics begins with dismantling the institutions, alliances, and economic system that sustain those achievements,» the spokesperson said, adding, «For more than a decade, Canary Mission has documented numerous instances in which anti-Zionist activism has crossed into antisemitic harassment, support for extremism, and hostility toward the United States and its democratic allies.»
«As these ideas have moved from activist circles into mainstream politics, DSA has emerged as the primary vehicle through which radical ideology is translated into political success,» said the spokesperson.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Canary Mission keeps its representatives unnamed for security reasons.
Fox News Digital reached out to Ocasio-Cortez’s office and DSA for comment.
alexandria ocasio cortez, democratic party, bernie sanders, presidential, elections, socialism
DEPORTE2 días ago“Hablame bien”: el tenso cruce de Lionel Messi con el árbitro en la victoria de Argentina ante Suiza en el Mundial
CHIMENTOS1 día agoEl álbum de las vacaciones soñadas de Darío Barassi con su familia: “Ibiza, nos vas enamorando”
ECONOMIA1 día agoEl petróleo sube más de 3% tras la reanudación de los ataques de EEUU contra Irán y la amenaza de cierre del estrecho de Ormuz

















