INTERNACIONAL
‘Send them back’ chants rock European Parliament after landslide vote to speed up deportations
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The European Parliament erupted into chants of «send them back» after lawmakers approved a sweeping overhaul of the European Union’s migrant return system, marking the latest sign that Europe is moving toward tougher immigration enforcement after years of growing anger and frustration from voters.
Members of the European Parliament voted on Wednesday 418 to 218, with 30 abstentions, to approve the Return Regulation, a measure designed to speed up the removal of third-country nationals who are staying illegally in the European Union.
The moment quickly turned explosive. After the vote was announced, right-wing lawmakers stood, applauded and chanted «send them back,» according to a video of the meeting. Lawmakers on the left responded by chanting «shame on you.»
‘YOU’RE DESTROYING YOUR COUNTRIES’: IS EUROPE FINALLY HEEDING TRUMP’S WARNING ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION?
European Parliament members chant «send them home» during a June 17 vote on new EU migration rules. (European Parliament streaming service)
The legislation still requires formal approval by the Council of the European Union and publication in the Official Journal before it enters into force, but the confrontation underscored how sharply divided Europe remains over migration, even as the bloc’s institutions move ahead with policies once seen as politically taboo.
The new rules would allow member states to detain some migrants for up to 24 months, with a possible six-month extension, and create a framework for «return hubs» outside the European Union in third countries willing to receive migrants with return decisions.
‘YOU’RE DESTROYING YOUR COUNTRIES’: IS EUROPE FINALLY HEEDING TRUMP’S WARNING ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION?
Migrants wade into the water near Gravelines, France, as traffickers with covered faces manage the scene before boarding a small boat at sunrise on July 2, 2025. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Supporters say the rules are necessary because European Union countries have struggled to enforce deportation orders. The European Conservatives and Reformists Group (ECR), citing the European Commission, said only around 20% of migrants who receive a return decision are actually returned.
The vote comes after Fox News Digital reported earlier in June that the European Union appeared to be moving toward tougher border and asylum rules amid growing concern over illegal immigration across the continent. The new measures include stricter screening, identity and security checks, and the use of biometric data such as fingerprints and facial recognition.
Members of the European Parliament are seen during a June 17 session in which chants of «send them home» were heard during a vote on new EU migration rules. (European Parliament streaming service)
Conservative leaders hailed the Parliament vote as a victory. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni called the result a «great success,» calling the legislation a «historic measure,» according to her post on X.
Other right-wing figures in France and Austria praised the moment as evidence that pressure from the right was reshaping European Union policy.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni addresses the 78th United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York City on September 20, 2023. (LEONARDO MUNOZ/AFP via Getty Images)
Critics, however, accused lawmakers of dehumanizing migrants and weakening core protections.
The Guardian reported that socialist vice president of the European Parliament Javi López called the plenary session «disgraceful,» while Italian Green and Left Alliance Member of the European Parliament Ilaria Salis described the celebration as «horrifying.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Migrants packed tightly on a small inflatable boat bail water as they attempt to cross the English Channel near the Dover Strait off the coast of Dover, England, on Sept. 7, 2020. More than 400 migrants made the journey from France to England by sea last Wednesday, either intercepted by UK border forces or arriving on shore in small boats. (Luke Dray/Getty Images)
Human rights groups have also raised alarms.
United Nations human rights chief Volker Türk warned the new rules risk expanding detention, Reuters reported, creating offshore return hubs and weakening safeguards against forced returns.
illegal immigrants, the european union, deportation, immigration, europe
INTERNACIONAL
Israeli ambassador, UN official shout over each other in tense exchange over sexual violence blacklist
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations (U.N.) Danny Danon erupted at Vanessa Frazier, the U.N. Secretary-General’s Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict, in a tense exchange over Frazier’s role in placing Israel on a blacklist on sexual violence.
The pair shouted over each other during a Friday U.N. meeting marking the International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict after a report Frazier helped author placed Israel on a sexual violence blacklist.
«You caved to the pressure. You caved to the Secretary General’s obsession with targeting Israel. And in doing so,» Danon began before Frazier chimed in.
«Wait, I’m speaking now!» Danon yelled.
UN DRAFT REPORT ON CHILDREN IN CONFLICT ZONES RAISES EYEBROWS WITH FRAMING OF ISRAELIS
Ambassador Danny Danon of Israel speaks during a joint press briefing with former hostage Ilana Gritzewsky at U.N. Headquarters on Aug. 27, 2025. (Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
«No, you will be quiet, because I’m speaking now! You spoke, now I speak. You spoke, and now I’ll speak. Shame on you, you’re part of the bullying of Israel. Shame on you, you can walk out. You spoke now, I speak. You can walk out, shame on you! You’re part of this, you’re part of his obsession,» he continued.
The United Nations Secretary-General’s office listed Israeli entities in the annex of the U.N.’s annual Conflict-Related Sexual Violence report in May. The report specifically mentioned the Israel Defense Forces, the Israel Prison Services and the country’s border police Counter Terrorism Unit after U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres labeled the organizations «a party credibly suspected of committing or being responsible for patterns of rape or other sexual violence.»
Danon had previously condemned the U.N.’s decision to add Israel to the blacklist and announced a freezing of relations between Israel and Guterres’ office.
NETANYAHU SLAMS ‘TERRORIST-SUPPORTING’ UN COUNCIL THAT ACCUSED ISRAEL OF COMMITTING SEXUAL CRIMES
In a statement to Fox News, Danon’s office blasted the decision as a «stain» and noted that Israel was being placed on a list with terrorist organizations.
«Israel has been placed on a blacklist alongside Hamas, ISIS, and Boko Haram. This is a moral disgrace that will be remembered as one of the darkest stains on António Guterres’ legacy,» he said.
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres addresses the media during the 38th Ordinary Session of the Heads of State and Government of the African Union at the African Union Commission headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on Feb. 15, 2025. (Tiksa Negeri/Reuters)
On Friday, Danon also called for U.N. Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict and Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations Pramila Patten to resign. He then rebuffed an apparent attempt by Frazier to defend Patten, noting that Patten was not present at the meeting.
UN COMMISSION ACCUSES ISRAEL OF ‘EXTERMINATION’ IN CONTROVERSIAL REPORT
«Ms. Patten was invited here, she chose not to be here. You will allow me to finish my words. Shameful. You are part of this shameful behavior. You are a part of it. Shame on you. Shame on you,» Danon shouted.
Patten’s office told Fox News Digital that she was sick and out of the office since June 17 and that this was announced before the meeting.
«I will speak and you will be quiet. You work for the U.N. and you will respect the rule of the U.N. Respect the rule. We will not allow you to bully us. We are a member state, and you work for the U.N., and you will be quiet now. You will be quiet. Shameful. You and your shameful report. We know why you took this position. We will not let you be part of this shameful campaign. I will finish my words. If you don’t want to listen, go out,» Danon continued.
UN REPORT TARGETING ISRAEL SPARKS BACKLASH, AUTHOR ACCUSED OF OVERSTEPPING HER MANDATE
Danon contended that Israel cooperated with the U.N. and that the organization did not independently review the evidence or give Israel a fair opportunity to address the allegations. He also accused Patten of lending credibility to a politically motivated campaign against Israel.
Pramila Patten, Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, speaks during a Security Council meeting on women and peace and security at the United Nations Headquarters. (Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
«If verifying the facts is not Ms. Patten’s responsibility, then what exactly is her responsibility?» Danon asked.
«You knew Israel had cooperated. You knew you had not reviewed the evidence yourself. Yet you chose to stand behind this falsehood. You should have said no. You should have resigned. You tried to stain Israel’s name. But the stain is not on Israel. The stain is on you,» he said during the U.N. meeting.
Patten’s office rebuked Danon’s claims of cooperation, telling Fox News Digital the claims were «not accurate in as much as the visit which was scheduled in March after Ramadan and before Passover (at the request of the State of Israel and the State of Palestine) was suspended after the war with Iran broke out on 28 February.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Danon’s office also plans on filing a formal complaint with the U.N. over Frazier’s interruptions during the meeting, his office told Fox News Digital.
Fox News Digital contacted a spokesperson for Patten and for Frazier but did not immediately receive a response.
secretary general, rape, united nations, human rights united nations, israel
INTERNACIONAL
Donald Trump cumplió un viejo sueño: presentó el nuevo avión presidencial Air Force One
El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, cumplió uno de sus objetivos más postergados: presentó en forma oficial el nuevo Air Force One, un lujoso Boeing 747 que fue regalado por el gobierno de Qatar y cuya modificación costó cerca de 400 millones de dólares.
Fiel al estilo personalista de Trump, el nuevo VC-25B Bridge -la denominación establecida por la US Air Force- deja de lado en su esquema exterior el azul adoptado en la era Kennedy para adoptar una imagen más audaz, con la mitad inferior pintada de azul marino y una franja roja por encima. El lado izquierdo, por donde aborda el Presidente, lleva el sello presidencial, mientras que la cola luce una enorme bandera estadounidense.
“Este avión fue transformado en una Casa Blanca voladora con un nivel de lujo que nadie ha visto jamás”, describió Trump en el acto oficial, realizado dentro de un enorme hangar de la Base Conjunta Andrews. También confirmó que llevará el nuevo jet a la cumbre de la OTAN en Ankara, Turquía, en julio, e indicó que regresará a China “en algún momento”, presumiblemente en referencia a la cumbre del Foro de Cooperación Económica Asia-Pacífico que ese país albergará en noviembre.
Su regreso de la cumbre del Grupo de los 7 en Francia esta semana fue el último viaje planificado a bordo del viejo Air Force One. Trump anunció que el nuevo avión presidencial sobrevolará Washington -a modo de presentación oficial- durante las celebraciones del 4 de julio, día de la independencia estadounidense.
El obsequio de Qatar servirá como “puente” para transportar al presidente hasta que lleguen los nuevos aviones encargados directamente a Boeing. Eso está previsto para 2028. Trump reiteró que Estados Unidos estaba en “un pequeño atasco” a la espera de la entrega, originalmente programada para 2024.
Washington aceptó formalmente el año pasado un lujoso jet Boeing 747 de Qatar para usarlo como avión presidencial, pese a las dudas sobre la ética y la legalidad de aceptar un regalo tan costoso de un gobierno extranjero. Trump aseguró que no volará en el jet qatarí una vez que deje el cargo y que la aeronave será donada a una futura biblioteca presidencial.
La US Air Force precisó que para ser llamado Air Force One, el avión “debe cumplir rigurosos requisitos de seguridad” y que el Boeing qatarí “fue modificado bajo un enfoque de ingeniería disciplinado que priorizó estas capacidades fundamentales exactas por encima de todo lo demás”. Sin embargo, señaló que “gran parte del diseño interior previo” del avión se mantuvo intacto.
Los esfuerzos de Trump por renovar el avión presidencial se remontan a su primer mandato, cuando ordenó que una flota entrante de nuevos jets adoptara un esquema de colores casi idéntico al de su avión personal. Su sucesor, Joe Biden, revirtió la decisión en marzo de 2023, después de que una revisión de la US Air Force indicara que los colores más oscuros podrían aumentar los costos y retrasar la entrega de los nuevos jets, pero una vez que Trump regresó al cargo, volvió a los colores que deseaba para el avión.
Otros jets del gobierno que transportan a otros altos funcionarios del gobierno también cambiarán su esquema al rojo, blanco y azul marino, informó la US Air Force.
Un vocero militar le dijo a la agencia The Associated Press que los dos aviones actuales -denominados VC-25A- no se retirarán. En cambio, permanecerán en la flota hasta que los nuevos aviones de Boeing entren en servicio.
No está claro cómo se utilizarán los jets más antiguos, pero el vocero indicó que tanto el jet qatarí como los VC-25A estarán disponibles para su uso y que “el Grupo de Transporte Aéreo Presidencial seleccionará la aeronave apropiada para cada misión en función de los requisitos operativos”.
Según la Fuerza Aérea, la entrega de la aeronave responde a la necesidad de reducir la presión sobre la envejecida flota VC-25A, cuyos ciclos de mantenimiento son cada vez más extensos. «La seguridad y la protección del comandante en jefe son nuestra máxima prioridad», afirmó en un comunicado el secretario de la Fuerza Aérea, Troy Meink.
Illinois GOP chair says Obama Center is political operation on public land
Illinois Republican Party Chairman Bob Grogan says the Obama Presidential Center functions as a political operation and headquarters for the Obama Foundation rather than a traditional presidential library. Grogan discusses public land, taxpayer-funded infrastructure, the Center’s endowment shortfall and why critics continue to oppose the project.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Following its Juneteenth opening, the Obama Presidential Center is embracing a message tied to one of the modern left’s most contentious ideas: that America was built on land «stolen» from Indians.
During Thursday’s dedication ceremony, Obama Foundation CEO Valerie Jarrett opened proceedings by acknowledging the American Indian tribes who originally inhabited the land where the center now stands.
But the acknowledgment extends well beyond the opening ceremony.
Just a few feet from the center’s landmark museum tower and near the Obama statue, visitors encounter a permanent display titled «Acknowledging Indigenous Peoples’ Land and Territory.»
OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER’S OPENING CEREMONY RIDICULED FOR ‘LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT’ BEFORE STAR-STUDDED SHOW
Composite image showing Obama Foundation CEO Valerie Jarrett speaking during the Obama Presidential Center opening ceremony, the Center’s museum tower and a permanent Indigenous land acknowledgment display located on the campus in Chicago. (Michael Dorgan/Fox News Digital; Fox Flight Team; Mustafa Hussain/Bloomberg via Getty)
The sign states that the Obama Foundation acknowledges «the sovereign Indigenous peoples who have, since time immemorial, inhabited and stewarded the lands many of us call home.»
Another section of the sign states that «Indigenous peoples» have worked to «combat and rightfully reverse the forces of settler colonialism» and features a 2009 Obama quote reflecting on broken treaties, lost lands and the treatment of Native Americans.
«Treaties were violated. Promises were broken,» Obama said.
Land acknowledgments have become common at universities, museums and public events, but critics often mock them as performative exercises associated with the view that America was built on «stolen land.» Supporters argue they serve as an important recognition of the history of American Indians and their connection to the land.
SUBCONTRACTORS SAY THEY’RE OWED MILLIONS, FACE FINANCIAL RUIN, AFTER HELPING BUILD OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER
A permanent Indigenous land acknowledgment display inside the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago includes a quote from former President Barack Obama about broken treaties and lost lands, as well as text recognizing Native American tribes historically connected to the area. The display is located near the museum tower and Obama statue. (Michael Dorgan/Fox News Digital)
But the land acknowledgment also underlines a glaring irony, one that was largely absent from Thursday’s opening ceremony, according to some critics. The Obama Presidential Center, operated by the private Obama Foundation, sits on public land transferred to the foundation by the city of Chicago for just $10 under a controversial agreement.
«People here in future years are going to hear about how this land was stolen from the Native Americans,» Illinois GOP Chair Bob Grogan told Fox News Digital outside the Center last week. «But underneath, you should all be reading into this, that it was actually stolen from the citizens of Illinois, not from the Native Americans.»
The criticism stems from a yearslong legal and political battle over the transfer of 19.3 acres of Jackson Park public land to the Obama Foundation under a 99-year agreement requiring the one-time $10 payment.
Critics also argue that what was originally presented as a presidential library evolved into a campus that serves as the home of the Obama Foundation.
A map graphic shows the footprint of the Obama Presidential Center inside Jackson Park on Chicago’s South Side along Lake Michigan. (Fox News Digital)
Grogan said visitors should view the display through the lens of the Center’s own history. He argued the land was created after the Great Chicago Fire through landfill and public works projects and therefore belongs to Chicago taxpayers.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«This land actually was recaptured from the Great Chicago Fire. They took a bunch of rubble and actually created this land,» he said. «So it has nothing to do with the Native Americans, but it has everything to do with stealing it from the taxpayers of the city of Chicago.»
Grogan argued the land fight cannot be separated from the broader controversy surrounding the Center, which has seen construction costs approach $1 billion and required millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded infrastructure improvements around Jackson Park. He also pointed to the Obama Foundation’s unfulfilled pledge to build a $470 million endowment fund intended to protect taxpayers from future operating costs.
Barack Obama speaks during the dedication of the Barack Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, Illinois. (Kent NISHIMURA / AFP via Getty Images)
Critics point to another irony.
In addition, the Center was promoted as a catalyst for economic opportunity on Chicago’s South Side and a vehicle for supporting minority-owned businesses. Yet a recent Fox News Digital investigation found several subcontractors — including minority-owned firms — claiming they are owed millions of dollars for work performed on the project.
The Obama Foundation did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.
Fox News’ Peter D’Abrosca contributed to this report.
barack obama, heritage, chicago, land, treaties, parks, culture opinion, republicans elections
Israeli ambassador, UN official shout over each other in tense exchange over sexual violence blacklist
Las dramáticas horas de Luis Miguel y su salud: la decisión que tomó su pareja en medio de su estado delicado
¿El Mundial es un motor para el consumo?: el dato clave que confirma el impacto en la economía
Militantes realizaron un “banderazo” en Parque Lezama para pedir la libertad de Cristina Kirchner
Mundial 2026, en VIVO: últimas noticias de hoy, 20 de junio, los partidos del día y el minuto a minuto de las selecciones
Los abrazos de Milei con Adorni y Bullrich y el desplante a Villarruel, en la previa del acto por el Día de la Bandera
Patricia Bullrich: “El Presidente considera que Adorni dio una explicación razonable”
El Gobierno envía señales de que Adorni tiene las horas contadas para evitar que sesione el Senado
La secuencia del golazo de Messi para Argentina ante Argelia en el debut en el Mundial 2026 y los récords que rompió
GOP Gov DeWine urges Ohio to abolish the death penalty, says it is no longer a deterrent
POLITICA3 días agoPatricia Bullrich: “El Presidente considera que Adorni dio una explicación razonable”
- POLITICA3 días ago
Decomisan un helicóptero producto del lavado de las coimas de Odebrecht
- POLITICA3 días ago
Papelón y escándalo: anularon un sorteo de viviendas en PBA porque se olvidaron de incluir una bolilla
