Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

WATCH: CENTCOM chief unloads after Dem asks ‘how many more Americans’ must die in Iran war 

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Central Command Commander Adm. Brad Cooper sharply rebuked Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton during a tense House Armed Services Committee hearing Tuesday after the Massachusetts Democrat questioned «how many more Americans» would die because of what he called a failed Iran strategy.

Advertisement

«It doesn’t seem to be going well,» Moulton, D-Mass., said of the Iran war. «And I would like to know how many more Americans we have to ask to die for this mistake.»

«I think it’s an entirely inappropriate statement from you, sir,» Cooper responded.

Moulton shot back: «It’s not a statement, it’s a question.»

Advertisement

TRUMP’S IRAN STRATEGY SHOWCASES ‘DOCTRINE OF UNPREDICTABILITY’ AMID STRIKE THREATS AND SUDDEN PAUSE

Fourteen U.S. service members have died in combat since the U.S. launched Operation Epic Fury Feb. 28. 

«I think it’s an entirely inappropriate statement from you, sir,» Central Command Commander Adm. Brad Cooper responded. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Advertisement
Rep. Seth Moulton and Adm. Brad Cooper

CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper sharply rebuked Rep. Seth Moulton during a tense House Armed Services Committee hearing Tuesday after the Massachusetts Democrat questioned «how many more Americans» would die because of what he called a failed Iran strategy. (Win McNamee/Getty Images:Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Moulton, a Marine Corps Iraq War veteran and frequent critic of the Trump administration’s Iran strategy, pressed Cooper repeatedly on what he described as the widening consequences of the conflict, including instability in the Strait of Hormuz, rising oil prices and reports that Iran had rebuilt parts of its missile infrastructure.

Cooper pushed back on several of the claims, calling reports that Iran had reconstituted key missile sites «inaccurate» and repeatedly emphasizing that U.S. forces had achieved their assigned military objectives.

The hearing came just after Trump said he directed the military to pause planned operations against Iran for Tuesday at the request of Gulf allies who wanted negotiations with Tehran to continue. The U.S. has been adhering to a ceasefire since April 7. 

Advertisement

Gulf leaders asked Trump to pause strikes because «serious negotiations are now taking place, and that, in their opinion, as Great Leaders and Allies, a Deal will be made, which will be very acceptable to the United States of America, as well as all Countries in the Middle East, and beyond,» he wrote on Truth Social Monday. 

«This Deal will include, importantly, NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS FOR IRAN!» he said.

Rep. Seth Moulton speaking during a House subcommittee hearing in Washington, D.C.

Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., a Marine Corps Iraq War veteran and frequent critic of the Trump administration’s Iran strategy, pressed Cooper repeatedly on what he described as the widening consequences of the conflict.  (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

DEMS SIDESTEP PAST ‘REFUSE ILLEGAL ORDERS’ DEMANDS AS THEY CHALLENGE TRUMP’S IRAN WAR AUTHORITY

Advertisement

The confrontation capped hours of contentious exchanges in which Democrats repeatedly pressed Cooper and Pentagon officials on whether the administration had a viable strategy beyond military strikes, whether ongoing operations complied with the War Powers Resolution and whether the conflict was making the United States less secure despite major battlefield gains against Iran.

Democrats also repeatedly challenged the administration over whether ongoing operations complied with the War Powers Resolution, arguing the continued blockade of Iranian ports and military exchanges in the Strait of Hormuz amounted to active hostilities.

Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., pressed Cooper over continued military operations in the region, noting U.S. forces had fired on Iranian tankers and exchanged fire with Iranian forces even after the administration notified Congress that hostilities had ended.

Advertisement
Apaches patrolling Strait of Hormuz

The U.S. military has been enforcing a naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, even during the ceasefire. (U.S. Central Command)

«The fact of the matter is that hostilities continue,» Garamendi said, accusing the administration of disregarding Congress and the Constitution.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., similarly argued that the blockade itself constituted «an act of war,» while several Democrats questioned whether the administration planned to seek congressional authorization for any future escalation.

Advertisement

Republicans on the panel, meanwhile, defended the campaign as a historic military success that dramatically weakened Iran’s ability to threaten the United States and its allies. 

Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Ala., said U.S. operations had «rolled back 40 years of Iranian military investment» and argued the campaign had made both the United States and its allies safer.

Cooper later testified that Iran was «significantly less capable» than before the strikes and said U.S. military action had «derailed Iran’s strategy» across its nuclear, missile and proxy networks.

Advertisement

congress, democrats, pentagon, war with iran, republicans

INTERNACIONAL

Mamdani-linked Platner adviser’s history with nude photos surfaces ahead of crucial Senate primary

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Democratic Party campaign strategist who recently went viral for doing damage control for Graham Platner amid his public sexting scandals has past writings that include comments about sending and receiving «nudes» and a footnote in a puberty guide for boys that he wrote, which referenced using images of his own penis.

Advertisement

Morris Katz, an up-and-coming New York City Democratic Party campaign strategist credited with being a major factor in New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s electoral upset last year, wrote on the Medium blogging platform in 2019, amid a separate Democratic Party sexting scandal, that he had both «sent» and «received nudes.» Katz also authored a 2020 puberty guide for boys that included, on page 17, a footnote saying that he initially considered using «images of my penis» to illustrate puberty before the publisher said it was inappropriate.

The resurfaced writings have drawn scrutiny over the last week from Maine Republicans after Katz was accused of trying to contain the fallout from the sexting scandal involving Platner that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women early in his marriage on Kik, an anonymous messaging app that has faced scrutiny over predatory behavior and child-safety concerns.

HOW MUCH BAGGAGE WILL DEMOCRATS ACCEPT FROM MAINE’S GRAHAM PLATNER?

Advertisement

The irony has not gone unnoticed by Republicans in Maine, who argue Katz’s past writings add another bizarre layer to a Platner campaign already struggling to move past allegations involving numerous scandals revolving around the candidate’s judgment.

Morris Katz, 27, has been widely credited with helping New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani complete his upset victory last year against Andrew Cuomo and Curtis Sliwa. (Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Jason Savage, executive director of the Maine Republican Party, told Fox News Digital that the combination of Platner and Katz is «like a sort of weird horror story,» arguing that both men appear unable to recognize «the guardrails of decency.»

Advertisement

«Morris Katz thinking that he was going to call up and intimidate Genevieve McDonald shows how bad his judgement is — he was never going to succeed at that and the fact he didn’t have the instincts to know better is just the first red flag of many for him,» Savage told Fox News Digital. «The combination of Morris Katz and Graham Platner is this weird horror story where neither one of them really understands the guardrails on decency. Neither one of them can recognize when there is a boundary.»

A Republican strategist, who is from rural Maine but wanted to remain anonymous when speaking to Fox News Digital, said the Katz controversy shows national progressive operatives are using Maine as a testing ground for an outsider-backed campaign that could ultimately weaken the seniority and resources incumbent Republican Senator Susan Collins has delivered to struggling communities across the state.

‘MAINE’S MAMDANI’: MAINE GOP CHIEF ISSUES WARNING ABOUT NEW CHALLENGER LOOKING TO OUST SUSAN COLLINS

Advertisement

«This guy [Katz], who is unbelievably strange, comes in from out of state and tries to get this horribly flawed guy, like limping, pleading across the finish line. That is so arrogant,» the GOP strategist said. «The arrogance that it takes to come in and say, ‘I’m an out-of-state progressive socialist here to make some money off a flawed candidate bleeding in the polls,’ and then try to take that away from the people who really need it, you’re going to take away what Susan Collins has done and will be able to do for these people.»

Susan Collins and Graham Platner split

Susan Collins (left) and Graham Platner (right). (Graeme Sloan/Getty Images ; Sophie Park/Getty Images)

Platner’s campaign has been dogged by controversies since he emerged as a progressive challenger in Maine’s closely watched Senate race against incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins.

Some of the most recent firestorms have centered on reports alleging Platner was abusive to an ex-girlfriend and that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women early in his marriage on the platform Kik. Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, reportedly disclosed the messages to campaign officials during an internal vetting process, and the campaign has acknowledged the messages existed while arguing the matter was addressed privately between Platner and his wife.

Advertisement

SENATE CANDIDATE GRAHAM PLATNER SENT EXPLICIT TEXTS TO MULTIPLE WOMEN WHILE MARRIED, WIFE SAYS: REPORT

The controversy intensified after reports that Platner still had an active profile on Kik, an anonymous messaging app that has faced criticism from child-safety groups and law enforcement officials. The profile reportedly featured a shirtless mirror selfie of Platner with a towel around his waist, which Republican staffers later appeared to mock outside the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee by showing up in towels.

NRSC staffers protest Platner

Republican staffers, including National Republican Senatorial Committee staffers, protest outside the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., wearing towels to mock Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner’s reported Kik profile photo. (Nicholas Ballasy/Fox News Digital)

Platner had already faced scrutiny over a tattoo that critics identified as a Nazi-linked symbol, which he later covered up. Platner has said he was unaware of the symbol’s association with Nazis when he got the tattoo years ago, although McDonald has contested he has been aware of its meaning for some time.

Advertisement

Platner also apologized after old Reddit posts resurfaced in which he made a series of inflammatory comments about rape, race, political violence, police, rural Americans and military veterans. Platner has said his views have changed and that some of his past comments reflected a darker period in his life after military service.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

More recently, Platner denied allegations from a former girlfriend who accused him of abusive behavior, calling the claims politically motivated. His campaign has accused critics and national media outlets of focusing on private matters and personal attacks rather than the issues affecting Maine voters.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to Katz, the Platner campaign, Fight Agency, Mamdani’s team and McDonald for comment.

sex crimes, fund raising, zohran mamdani, republicans, campaigning

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

El caso Lyhanna: Francia cuestiona la justicia tras el asesinato de una niña de 11 años y las fallas en la investigación de su presunto asesino

Published

on


El caso de pedofilia y asesinato de Lyhanna, que había cumplido 11 años, con el padre de una de sus amigas como principal sospechoso, conmueve a Francia e interpela la lentitud y eficacia de la justicia francesa. Los magistrados y fiscales no se movilizaron con rapidez ni interés en el caso, ni declararon la alerta inmediata.

Tras una marcha silenciosa, que congregó el domingo a 6.000 personas en Fleurance, Gers, para rendir homenaje a Lyhanna —cuyo cuerpo fue identificado en un silo agrícola donde trabajaba el asesino—, el ministro de Justicia, Gérald Darmanin, se dirigió a los procuradores.

Advertisement

Pidió a los fiscales, reunidos el lunes por la mañana en el Ministerio de Justicia, «una revisión de las denuncias de menores víctimas de violencia sexual antes de mediados de julio», priorizando los casos en los que las víctimas son menores de edad.

La justicia cuestionada

Tras este «terrible fracaso», Darmanin hizo un llamamiento a la movilización general. Explicó en conferencia de prensa que había pedido a los magistrados que «reconocieran las deficiencias, cuando existieran».

Advertisement

Desde el hallazgo del cuerpo de la niña de 11 años y la revelación de las acusaciones de violación contra el sospechoso, el ministro de Justicia ha denunciado reiteradamente las «inaceptables» disfunciones del sistema judicial. Asociaciones feministas y de protección infantil también convocaron manifestaciones frente a los juzgados el lunes.

Jérôme Barella, el sospechoso de haberla asesinado, ya tenía casos por violación a menores que no habían sido investigados.

El hermano también está detenido

Advertisement

El hermano de Jérôme Barella se encuentra bajo custodia policial, sospechoso de violar a su expareja.

El minisro de Justicia francés, Gerald Darmanin. Foto: Reuters

«La información que recibo me lleva a creer que ha habido un grave fallo en el sistema de justicia pública», afirmó el ministro Gérald Darmanin. «Diré toda la verdad, sin ocultar nada al pueblo francés», aseguró y anunció que no renunciará a su cargo de ministro.

Tensiones políticas y judiciales

La ley Darmanin sobre justicia penal está impactada por el caso Lyhanna. En enero, en una entrevista con Le Figaro, Gérald Darmanin prometió que su plan de justicia penal «reduciría a la mitad la acumulación de casos».

Advertisement

Menos de seis meses después, esta legislación, destinada a aliviar la carga de los tribunales, adquiere una resonancia particularmente significativa con el asesinato de Lyhanna, que ha puesto de manifiesto las disfunciones de un sistema judicial sobrecargado en Francia.

El proyecto de ley sobre justicia penal y respeto a las víctimas llega a comisión en la Asamblea Nacional este lunes. Presionado por el caso Lyhanna —el viernes ofreció sus «disculpas en nombre de la justicia»—, el ministro de Justicia tendrá la difícil tarea de convencer a los parlamentarios para que voten a favor de su proyecto de ley, que ha provocado una gran indignación entre los abogados.

Esta es la primera parte de la denominada ley «SURE» (sanciones útiles, rápidas y efectivas).

Advertisement

La lucha contra la violencia sexual

La lucha contra la violencia sexual y de género, para la cual cerca de cien parlamentarios de todo el espectro político presentaron un proyecto de ley marco a finales de 2025 —y que el caso Lyhanna ha reavivado—, debe ser una «tarea de gran envergadura», según la Fundación de Mujeres.

'En memoria de Lyhanna', reza la remera de una mujer durante la marcha en Fleurance. Foto: EFE

«Ya no queremos medidas a medias, leyes aprobadas con prisas ni soluciones provisionales. Hemos aceptado esto durante demasiado tiempo en los últimos diez años, en los que hemos denunciado la violencia contra las mujeres y los niños: lo que necesitamos es una tarea de gran envergadura, una reforma integral», declaró Anne-Cécile Mailfert, presidenta de la asociación, el lunes.

El proyecto de ley número 2169, impulsado por la diputada socialista Céline Thiébaut-Martinez, de Seine-et-Marne, y basado en 140 recomendaciones de organizaciones feministas —»con el objetivo de combatir de forma integral la violencia sexista y sexual contra las mujeres y los niños»—, se presentó el 2 de diciembre de 2025. Consta de 79 artículos.

Advertisement

El caso de Lyhanna, la estudiante de secundaria de 11 años hallada muerta el viernes en la región de Gers, ha reavivado el debate.

Magistrados furiosos

Un sindicato de magistrados denunció ataques «inaceptables» y cuestionó al ministro Darmanin. Es «inaceptable» que los magistrados «sean señalados y objeto de escarnio público y amenazas», antes de que se conozcan los resultados de la investigación administrativa iniciada tras la desaparición de Lyhanna, declaró el lunes el presidente del Sindicato de Magistrados (USM), en una inusual carta dirigida al ministro de Justicia.

Advertisement

«La muerte de una niña es una tragedia absoluta. Debemos a las familias y a la ciudadanía transparencia respecto a las circunstancias estructurales y fácticas que contribuyeron a ella», escribió Ludovic Friat a Gérald Darmanin, cuya «responsabilidad política», según él, «sigue siendo completa».

El presidente del USM, el sindicato mayoritario de magistrados, acusó al ministro de Justicia de haber «designado ya a los responsables y anunciado sanciones disciplinarias» antes del inicio de la investigación de la Inspección General de Justicia, una «presión deliberada» ejercida sobre él.

Gérald Darmanin señaló la «lentitud» y la «falta de priorización». «En el caso específico de Lyhanna, no se trata de una cuestión de recursos», afirmó. «No es la falta de recursos lo que impidió tomar decisiones en este caso concreto. La fiscalía de Auch recibió recursos adicionales el pasado septiembre. Además, el proceso es lento. Se trata más bien de esta lentitud y la falta de priorización», añadió. «La información que recibo me lleva a creer que ha habido un grave fallo en el sistema de justicia pública», declaró.

Advertisement

Un pedófilo nunca investigado

Jérôme Barella, principal sospechoso del asesinato de Lyhanna, es objeto de al menos seis denuncias y dos informes.

¿Cuántas víctimas potenciales? Antes del asesinato de Lyhanna, por el que fue acusado de secuestro y detención ilegal, Jérôme Barella era objeto de varias denuncias por violación y agresión sexual a menores, las cuales fueron desestimadas o por las que nunca fue interrogado.

Advertisement

La revelación de denuncias anteriores a la desaparición de la niña desató una controversia nacional sobre las deficiencias del sistema judicial. Este hombre de 40 años, trabajador temporal y exempleado polivalente en escuelas, es objeto de seis denuncias, dos informes y un procedimiento disciplinario.

El primer caso conocido en su contra data de diciembre de 2017. En ese momento, la madre de una estudiante de secundaria de 17 años, que asistía a la escuela donde Jérôme Barella trabajaba como personal de mantenimiento, presentó una denuncia. Esta madre denunció una relación entre su hija menor de edad y este hombre, que tenía 32 años en ese entonces. El caso se cerró dos meses después, en febrero de 2018, luego de que la joven asegurara a los investigadores que la relación había sido consensuada.

Entre 2018 y 2021, Jérôme Barella fue contratado como personal de mantenimiento en varios institutos del departamento de Gers. En 2020, mientras trabajaba en el instituto Maréchal-Lannes de Lectoure, fue objeto de un procedimiento disciplinario, «tras una denuncia por comportamiento inapropiado hacia una alumna», según la región de Occitania. Su despido se anunció en 2021.

Advertisement

En enero de 2022, la fiscalía de Béthune, en el distrito de Pas-de-Calais, abrió un procedimiento contra Jérôme Barella tras una denuncia por «violación de una menor de 15 años». Esta denuncia se refería a presuntos actos cometidos en 2020 contra una niña de 7 años, en el domicilio del acusado, en Montestruc-sur-Gers. Sin embargo, en mayo de 2024, el caso fue desestimado por «falta de pruebas suficientes». Este miércoles, Clémence Meyer, fiscal de Auch, indicó que la denuncia será «reexaminada a la luz de nuevas pruebas».

En el verano de 2025, la fiscalía de Toulouse abrió un tercer caso contra Jérôme Barella, tras la denuncia presentada por los padres de una niña, nacida en 2021. La víctima, amiga de la hija del acusado, denunció violaciones cometidas «entre septiembre de 2024 y mayo de 2025 en el domicilio» del hombre en Montestruc-sur-Gers.

Esta denuncia por «violación de una menor de 15 años» se registró el 22 de agosto de 2025 en la comisaría de gendarmería de Plaisance-du-Touch, Haute-Garonne, donde se habían mudado los padres de la víctima. Según la fiscalía de Toulouse, la niña fue entrevistada tras la presentación de la denuncia y examinada por un psicólogo. Sin embargo, Jérôme Barella no fue ni entrevistado ni interrogado.

Advertisement

Según una fuente cercana al caso, el hombre, de unos cuarenta años, sabía que era el objetivo de la investigación. Acosó a los padres de la presunta víctima y les rogó que retiraran la denuncia, alegando que sentía un gran afecto por su hija.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Obama-appointed judge who blocked Trump birthright citizenship order strikes again, throws out visa overhaul

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An Obama-appointed federal judge who previously blocked President Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order has again dealt a major setback to the administration by striking down Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa payment requirement and declaring the policy unlawful.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin of Massachusetts ruled Monday that the Trump administration lacked the authority to impose the hefty payment on employers seeking new H-1B visas, finding that the requirement amounted to a tax that only Congress has the constitutional power to impose.

In Monday’s 42-page decision, Sorokin sided with a coalition of 20 states that challenged Trump’s September 2025 proclamation creating a new $100,000 payment requirement for employers filing petitions for foreign workers under the H-1B visa program, which allows U.S. employers to hire skilled foreign workers. Approximately 65,000 foreign workers are issued a H-1B visa each year.

TRUMP’S $100K H-1B VISA OVERHAUL COULD HIT TECH GIANTS LIKE AMAZON AND MICROSOFT HARDEST

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. (Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Before Trump’s proclamation, employers typically paid between $2,000 and $5,000 in filing fees to sponsor an H-1B worker, depending on the type of application and the size of the company.

The administration had argued that the measure was necessary to curb abuse of the visa system and protect American workers.

Advertisement

Trump’s proclamation stated that the H-1B program had been exploited to replace U.S. workers with lower-paid foreign labor and that the new payment would help address those concerns.

Sorokin rejected the administration’s legal justification, finding that the Immigration and Nationality Act gives presidents broad authority over the entry of noncitizens but does not authorize them to impose taxes.

«While the Executive has broad discretion over the admission and exclusion of aliens, … that discretion is not boundless,» Sorokin wrote, referring to previous case law.

Advertisement

Sorokin concluded that the payment functioned as a tax rather than a permissible immigration restriction.

TRUMP IS DOWN BUT NOT OUT IN COURT BATTLE OVER HARVARD’S FOREIGN STUDENT VISAS

«The Court finds that the Policy imposes a tax on H-1B petitions without the requisite delegation by Congress,» Sorokin wrote.

Advertisement

He further rejected the administration’s argument that the payment requirement was simply another immigration restriction, bluntly stating: «Taxes are not ‘restrictions.’»

Beyond the constitutional concerns, Sorokin also found that federal agencies violated the Administrative Procedure Act by implementing the policy without notice-and-comment rule making and concluded that the agencies exceeded their statutory authority.

As a remedy, Sorokin declared the policy unlawful and vacated it in its entirety.

Advertisement
Signage for the US Department of State outside headquarters building in Washington DC

Signage for the U.S. Department of State is displayed outside its headquarters in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington, D.C., on April 15, 2025. (Jim Watson/AFP)

Sorokin, a Yale and Columbia Law School graduate, was nominated to the federal bench by President Barack Obama in 2013 and confirmed by the Senate in 2014. Last year, Sorokin was the fourth judge to issue a nationwide injunction blocking Trump’s executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship. He ruled that the policy is likely unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. That dispute has since reached the Supreme Court, and a ruling is expected in the coming weeks.

The administration is expected to appeal Sorokin’s decision, setting up another legal battle over the scope of presidential authority in immigration matters and the limits of executive power.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«President Trump has clear legal authority to restrict entry of any class of aliens he determines is not in America’s best interests, and that is exactly what he did,» White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Fox News Digital. «The H-1B program has been abused for decades, and President Trump finally took action to fix it. A federal judge in Washington already upheld a nearly identical order, and the Administration is confident this order will be reversed on appeal.»

In a separate challenge filed in December 2025, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington declined to block the policy after dismissing claims from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that the additional H-1B charge violated federal immigration law.

Advertisement

federal courts, immigration, congress, donald trump, federal judges, taxes, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias