INTERNACIONAL
Birth tourism crackdown expands as House chairman raises criminal conspiracy case

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A House task force chairman says companies helping foreign nationals travel to the United States to give birth so their children obtain U.S. citizenship could be engaging in a criminal conspiracy.
Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, who chairs the House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on Defending Constitutional Rights and Exposing Institutional Abuses, told Fox News Digital that his panel has subpoenaed several so-called «birth tourism companies» as it investigates firms advertising services to help foreign nationals travel to the United States to give birth.
«Right now, under current law, birth tourism is illegal. You cannot come into the United States for the purpose of giving birth,» Gill said.
TRUMP BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP FIGHT COMES ROARING BACK WITH ‘INVADERS’ PLAY AFTER KAVANAUGH ROADMAP
Rep. Brandon Gill speaks on birthright citizenship. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
«And I believe that there’s a compelling legal case to be made that these businesses that are facilitating this process — facilitating somebody coming into the United States to give birth — lying on their immigration forms or on their visa forms — are engaging in a form of criminal conspiracy, and that’s what we’re going to get to the bottom of,» Gill said.
State Department regulations prohibit foreign nationals from obtaining visitor visas when consular officers determine that their primary purpose is traveling to the United States to give birth so their child obtains U.S. citizenship.
While Gill’s task force has been quietly looking into several companies since at least 2025, the national scrutiny intensified after photographs circulated in July of a billboard advertising for the Women’s Center at Mission Regional Medical Center in Mission, Texas – a stone’s throw from Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
The Spanish-language billboard advertised a now-defunct «Have My Baby In Texas» website, and quoted Mission Regional providing births for $3,950 and Caesarean Sections for $5,525. It also displayed a phone number that included «001» – the country code required for international calls to the U.S.
MAINE GOP HOPEFUL VYING FOR TRUMP ENDORSEMENT PREVIOUSLY RAN BIRTHING CLINICS CATERING TO MIGRANT WOMEN

Demonstrators holds up a banner during a citizenship rally outside of the Supreme Court in Washington, May 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)
Gill and others have since issued responses to the controversy, with the State of Texas also launching its own investigation of the hospital.
«I think it’s astounding,» Gill said. His task force is investigating several similar operations, including one in Miami, and has requested records from that business and three others nationwide.
Gill said birth tourism is an «obvious and clear abuse» of the U.S. immigration system and of the benevolence of the American people and the nation’s institutions.
TRUMP BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP FIGHT COMES ROARING BACK WITH ‘INVADERS’ PLAY AFTER KAVANAUGH ROADMAP

Demonstrators rally in support of birthright citizenship outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 1, 2026. (Mandel Ngan/Getty Images)
«We are the ones who often end up picking up the tab for a lot of these services,» he said, arguing that birthright citizenship was intended for former slaves and their children when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868.
«It had nothing to do with hordes of illegal aliens crossing our southern border and giving birth in America and using those babies to anchor illegal aliens into our country. And for all of America’s history, we’ve always had a very clear understanding that there are certain people who are born within America’s boundaries, within America borders, who are not American citizens, the children of an invading army.»
The latter point was captured by Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and put into legislation Fox News Digital exclusively broke earlier in the week.
That proposal would codify President Donald Trump’s executive order deeming the illegal immigration crisis an «invasion» and cite the 1898 Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court case’s exemption of citizenship for people not «bound to render obedience to the sovereign (U.S. government) whose domains are being invaded.»
Gill said he had heard about but not fully read Banks’ bill – but underlined he believes it to be a «phenomenal» plan of action.
«I think that that is the type of legal clarification that could help us out quite a bit in the long run,» he said.
«Remember that the goal is to make sure that our children’s birthright isn’t being taken away from us because foreigners are coming in and having babies in our country and then buying up our homes and taking American jobs and using welfare that the American people are paying for.»
Gill said the crisis touches on the biggest issue from the 2024 election cycle, which he considered to be the illegal immigration crisis writ-large.
«In this case; seeing people cross the border so that their children can be anchored into the United States. That is such an obvious abuse of the American People economically, socially, culturally. It’s a huge risk to America’s national defense.»
A Mission Regional spokesperson told Fox News Digital on Friday the hospital remains an «award-winning, nonprofit» infirmary that has been operating as such since 1954.
«We recognize that a very limited marketing campaign may have caused unintended misunderstanding and was immediately discontinued. The campaign was meant to highlight services available to the communities we serve and was never intended to encourage any unlawful activity and Mission Regional Medical Center remains committed to serving the Rio Grande Valley with integrity, compassion, transparency, and full compliance with all applicable laws,» the spokesperson said.
The spokesperson said the billboard campaign returned very little patient volume and no financial benefit to a community they said has a high uninsured-patient rate and limited maternity care.
«The hospital does not support or facilitate unlawful activity and has never operated its obstetric program with the intent of attracting individuals who are unlawfully present in the United States, promoting birth tourism, or encouraging travel to the United States for the purpose of obtaining U.S. citizenship for a child,» the spokesperson added.
Citing a separate order from Austin, the spokesperson said 99% of all emergency and inpatient patients who responded to a state-required survey were legal U.S. residents or citizens.
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«Birth tourism should never be big business in the United States. This tactic exploits U.S. immigration law, and those who willfully mispresent their intentions to temporarily come to the U.S. are breaking the law,» Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chairman of the greater Oversight Committee said in May.
In a concurrence to the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling striking down Trump’s birthright citizenship order, Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated that Congress could still act through legislation. Gill, Banks and other lawmakers have said they plan to pursue that route as they seek to restrict birthright citizenship.
illegal immigrants, immigration, border security, controversies state and local, congress
INTERNACIONAL
Estados Unidos cambia una regla histórica del jugo de naranja vigente desde 1963 y afecta a toda la industria

El gobierno de Estados Unidos aprobó el viernes 17 de julio un cambio en la normativa federal que regula el jugo de naranja pasteurizado, al reducir el requisito mínimo de sólidos solubles de 10,5% a 10% Brix, una medida que afecta a productores, procesadores y consumidores en todo el país. El Brix es una escala utilizada en la industria alimentaria para medir la cantidad de azúcares naturales y otros sólidos disueltos presentes en líquidos como el jugo de naranja, y sirve como referencia para garantizar el sabor y la consistencia del producto. La decisión, anunciada por el Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos (HHS)y la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA), responde a la presión ejercida por la industria citrícola y busca facilitar el uso de fruta nacional tras años de dificultades por enfermedades y fenómenos climáticos adversos.
Según el comunicado emitido por el HHS, el secretario Robert F. Kennedy Jr. oficializó la medida en un encuentro con autoridades locales y representantes del sector en Lakeland, Florida. De acuerdo con la FDA, la nueva regla también incrementa el porcentaje permitido de jugo de mandarinas y tangerinas en la mezcla final, lo que otorga mayor margen a los productores. La actualización fue respaldada por organizaciones gremiales y funcionarios estatales, que destacaron la urgencia de adaptar la normativa a la realidad actual del sector.
El estándar federal para el jugo de naranja pasteurizado se mantenía vigente desde 1963. El ajuste responde a la disminución en los niveles de azúcar de la fruta, sobre todo en Florida, principal estado productor en el país. Según datos del Departamento de Agricultura (USDA), la caída en la producción y calidad del fruto se agravó en la última década por la expansión del citrus greening, una enfermedad bacteriana sin tratamiento efectivo.
¿Por qué Estados Unidos modificó el estándar de azúcar para el jugo de naranja?
El cambio en el estándar federal surge como respuesta a un contexto de crisis productiva en la citricultura estadounidense. Según el Departamento de Agricultura de Estados Unidos (USDA), la enfermedad conocida como citrus greening (Huanglongbing) ha afectado a millones de árboles en Florida, reduciendo el nivel de azúcares en los frutos y provocando que el jugo de naranja nacional quedara por debajo del mínimo requerido durante varias temporadas.
La industria, encabezada por la Asociación de Procesadores de Cítricos de Florida y Florida Citrus Mutual, presentó una petición formal para modificar el estándar, argumentando que la normativa vigente no reflejaba la composición real de la fruta cultivada en el país. El comunicado de la FDA señala que la reducción del mínimo de Brix “permitirá a los productores y procesadores aprovechar mejor la cosecha local y disminuir la dependencia de importaciones de jugo desde Brasil y otros mercados”.
En la presentación oficial, el secretario Robert F. Kennedy Jr. afirmó: “Estamos eliminando una regulación obsoleta que obligaba a los productores estadounidenses a depender de importaciones y de un estándar de azúcar desactualizado. Esto permitirá ahorrar más de 50 millones de dólares al año y fortalecerá las cadenas de suministro nacionales”.

El grado Brix es una medida que indica la concentración de sólidos solubles, principalmente azúcares naturales, presentes en el jugo. Desde 1963, la normativa federal exigía un mínimo de 10,5% Brix para que un jugo fuera comercializado como jugo de naranja pasteurizado en Estados Unidos. Con la nueva regla, el mínimo se reduce a 10%, permitiendo que más jugo producido localmente cumpla con la regulación.
De acuerdo con la FDA, la diferencia entre 10,5 y 10 Brix es mínima y “la mayoría de los consumidores no percibirá cambios significativos en el sabor”. El profesor Randy Worobo, experto en ciencia de los alimentos en la Universidad de Cornell, explicó a Newsweek que “la variación es tan leve que el paladar promedio no la detectará, dado que existe una variabilidad natural en el jugo de naranja”.
La agencia también aclara que la nueva normativa no autoriza la dilución del jugo con agua ni la reducción de su concentración a partir de jugo concentrado, ya que el producto debe seguir siendo 100% jugo de naranja.
Además de la reducción del mínimo de Brix, la FDA elevó el límite permitido para el uso de jugo proveniente de variedades de Citrus reticulata (mandarinas, tangerinas y sus híbridos) en el jugo de naranja pasteurizado, pasando del 10% al 15%. Según la agencia, esta medida otorga flexibilidad a los productores, pues estas variedades han mostrado mayor resistencia a enfermedades como el citrus greening.
El Departamento de Agricultura de Estados Unidos ajustó sus propios estándares de clasificación para jugo de naranja, alineándose con la nueva regla de la FDA. El objetivo es facilitar la utilización de fruta nacional y reducir la necesidad de importaciones para cumplir con los requisitos federales.

Según la FDA, la modificación del estándar permitirá a los procesadores reducir costos de producción, ya que no tendrán que mezclar jugos importados de mayor dulzor para cumplir con la norma anterior. La agencia estima que la industria podría ahorrar hasta 52,3 millones de dólares anuales por este concepto.
El impacto en los precios al consumidor no es inmediato ni garantizado. La medida podría ayudar a estabilizar los precios del jugo de naranja, que han registrado alzas en los últimos años debido a la escasez de fruta y al aumento de los costos de importación, según la Asociación de Procesadores de Cítricos de Florida. No obstante, las empresas podrían destinar el ahorro a cubrir pérdidas por enfermedades y eventos climáticos extremos, en lugar de trasladarlo directamente al precio en góndola.
La actualización recibió respaldo institucional por parte de organizaciones y autoridades estatales. Ashley Moody, senadora republicana de Florida, celebró la medida señalando que “garantiza que los agricultores puedan seguir operando y manteniendo la producción frente a los desafíos actuales”.
Por su parte, Shannon Shepp, directora ejecutiva del Departamento de Cítricos de Florida, sostuvo que la decisión de la FDA “reconoce la realidad productiva de Florida y apoya la continuidad de las familias citrícolas”. El presidente de Florida Citrus Mutual, Kevin Koppelman, afirmó en un comunicado que “modernizar este estándar asegura que podamos aprovechar al máximo la producción local y sostener la industria frente a la crisis”.

La reducción del estándar de azúcar no afecta los parámetros de seguridad alimentaria ni la calidad nutricional del jugo, según la FDA. El ajuste forma parte de la estrategia federal “Make America Healthy Again”, que busca fortalecer la producción nacional de alimentos y adaptarse a los desafíos sanitarios y climáticos.
De acuerdo con el Departamento de Agricultura, la industria citrícola genera miles de empleos en Florida y otros estados, y su sostenibilidad depende de la capacidad de adaptación frente a enfermedades y fenómenos meteorológicos. La actualización permite aprovechar la fruta nacional, evita el desperdicio y reduce la necesidad de importaciones, aspectos que pueden contribuir a la estabilidad económica del sector.
¿Cuándo entran en vigor los nuevos estándares para el jugo de naranja en Estados Unidos?
La FDA y el HHS informaron que la nueva regulación entra en vigencia de inmediato, aunque los cambios en el etiquetado y la oferta comercial podrían verse reflejados de manera paulatina a medida que los procesadores adecuan sus líneas de producción. El Departamento de Agricultura continuará monitoreando el impacto de la medida sobre la calidad y el mercado del jugo de naranja.
El sector citrícola espera que la actualización ayude a estabilizar la producción y mantener la competitividad de la industria ante los desafíos sanitarios y climáticos. No habrá cambios en los mecanismos de control de calidad ni en los requisitos de inocuidad alimentaria, según la FDA.
jugo de naranja,naranja,planta procesadora,industria alimentaria
INTERNACIONAL
La memoria de la Guerra Civil española y sus espantos, 90 años después

Tiros, traición y muerte
La cautela de Franco
Los factores que le abrieron paso a Franco
La ayuda de Hitler y Mussolini
El derrumbe de la resistencia republicana
INTERNACIONAL
Incoming UK PM Andy Burnham rejects Thatcher-era policies, signals leftward shift

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Britain’s incoming Prime Minister Andy Burnham used his first speech as Labour leader Friday to condemn the economic model established in the 1980s by Margaret Thatcher and promise greater public control of essential services, signaling a shift to the left from outgoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Burnham, who will formally become prime minister Monday, said that Britain had taken «a series of wrong turns in the 1980s,» when political power was centralized and economic power was transferred to private companies. He was unopposed to run as party leader, having been nominated by 379 Members of Parliament to lead it.
«The country surrendered control of the essentials — housing, water, energy, transport — and left people exposed to higher costs,» Burnham said during the July 17 speech in London, according to a transcript of his remarks.
WHO IS ANDY BURNHAM? THE TRUMP CRITIC SET TO BECOME THE U.K.’S NEXT PRIME MINISTER
He declared that four decades of neoliberal economic policy had «not been kind» to the working-class and industrial communities that traditionally supported Labour and described his ascent as the country’s most significant political turning point in 40 years.
«The government I lead will confidently lay that path out starting next week,» Burnham said. «That is why this change today is the most significant change moment in our politics for 40 years.
Alan Mendoza, executive director of the Henry Jackson Society, said Burnham’s speech offered a clear ideological signal but little detail about how his government would carry it out. «With Burnham, there is a lot of light and heat, but not much actual substance,» he added. «We are all still waiting to see what that substance might be.»

Britons suffer through the ‘Winter of Discontent’ as a man walks past a pile of rubbish in London. Sanitation workers joined other unions across the U. K. on strike in February 1979. (Graham Morris/Evening Standard/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Mendoza said, «If he thinks Britain has been on the wrong track for the last 40 years, what is the right track? Is it socialism of a past kind? Is it some form of statism? What does he actually intend to do?»
Burnham’s speech offered the clearest indication yet that the former Greater Manchester mayor intends to move the party away from Starmer’s more cautious economic positioning and toward greater state ownership, expanded council and social housing, giving more power to regional government and increased state involvement in essential services.
FARAGE SAYS MASS MIGRATION HAS CHANGED THE UK ‘LITERALLY BEYOND RECOGNITION,’ BELIEVES PARTY CAN WIN ELECTION
Burnham said Labour would no longer attempt to imitate the right and far-left parties. «We won’t try to out-Green the Greens or out-Reform Reform.»
Although he did not explicitly advocate returning Britain to the 1970s or refer to the late Lady Thatcher by name, free-market critics portrayed his attack on her reforms as an effort to revive the state-dominated economic policies that preceded her government.
Britain experienced the Winter of Discontent in 1978-79, when millions of workers participated in widespread strikes over pay that disrupted daily life. The strikes left trash uncollected, reduced hospital services and affected public transportation. The unrest is widely seen as a major factor in the election of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservatives in 1979 as voters turned against the unions and the Labour government of that time.
KEIR STARMER RESIGNS AS BRITISH PRIME MINISTER AFTER DEVASTATING LABOUR REVOLT AND LOCAL ELECTION LOSSES

Andy Burnham, who is expected to become the U.K.’s next prime minister on Monday, speaks to supporters after winning a by-election in Ashton in Makerfield, England, on Friday, June 19, 2026. (Jon Super/AP)
The Adam Smith Institute responded to his speech by publishing a lengthy defense of the Thatcher era, highlighting reductions in income and corporate tax rates, privatizations, rising homeownership and fewer days lost to labor strikes.
«Since you mentioned the 1980s, Andy Burnham, here’s a reminder of what was achieved,» the free-market think tank wrote before listing economic indicators it said improved during the period.
According to the free-market think tank, the top rate of income tax fell from 83% to 40%, the basic rate dropped from 33% to 25%, and corporation tax was reduced from 52% to 35%. It said inflation declined from a peak of 21.9% in 1980 to 2.4% in 1986, while the number of working days lost to strikes fell from 29.5 million in 1979 to 1.9 million in 1990. The institute also said homeownership rose from 55% to 67%, the number of individual shareholders increased from 3 million to 11 million, and national debt fell from 47% of gross domestic product to 28%.
Emma Schubart, a research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society who previously worked at the Adam Smith Institute, told Fox News Digital that Burnham’s speech demonstrated what she described as a fundamental misunderstanding of taxation and economic incentives.
«The biggest takeaway is that he comes across as pretty economically illiterate,» Schubart said in an interview Friday. She called Burnham’s «demonization» of Thatcher polices «strange and needless.»

Margaret Thatcher, British Prime Minister, addresses a Press Conference at Conservative Party Headquarters in Smith Square, London on June 8, 1987 during the General Election campaign. (David Levenson/Getty Images)
Schubart argued that Burnham’s message was internally contradictory because he presented his leadership as a national renewal while proposing to dismantle reforms associated with the 1980s.
«He keeps saying he’s bringing a renewal to the U.K. and a new chapter,» she said. «But then he also says, ‘We’re going to go back to the ’70s.’ You have to pick one.»
Burnham nevertheless insisted he would be a «pro-business leader,» while calling for greater public control of essential services, new powers for regional governments and closer cooperation with private businesses.

U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer wave as they board Air Force One at Prestwick Airport ahead of a flight to north-east Scotland on July 28, 2025 in Prestwick, Scotland. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The ideological shift presents an immediate political gamble. Burnham must unite Labour’s competing factions, reassure financial markets and respond to Reform UK’s growing challenge — all while taking office without winning a national election.
Mendoza warned that Burnham’s effort to appeal to the left could complicate relations with the Trump administration. «The government could most definitely clash with the United States under Burnham’s vision, because the voters he is trying to bring back into his tent include many of those who are deeply hostile to America.
«If he adopts U.S.-friendly policies, he risks alienating the voting coalition he is trying to create,» he continued. «But if he decides to pick fights with the United States, he risks damaging British national security and the alliance with America, which matters far more to the country than any electoral coalition.»
Burnham is expected to be sworn in as prime minister on Monday by King Charles III.
andy burnham, united kingdom, economic policy, politics
DEPORTE2 días agoEl machete del arquero inglés en una botella que sorprendió a Messi tras el triunfo: el dardo de un ayudante de Scaloni a Inglaterra
POLITICA2 días agoEl fuerte cruce público entre Victoria Villarruel y Patricia Bullrich tras los chats filtrados antes de la sesión del Senado
POLITICA2 días agoAdrián Ravier, vocero de Milei: “No coincidimos en el Gobierno con esto de que la gente no llega a fin de mes”




















