Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

WATCH: Hearing erupts after Dem chair tries to sidestep GOP transgender sports bills: ‘They’re petrified’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Pennsylvania hearing on transgender sports legislation erupted in chaos Monday, as Republicans accused Democrats of trying to sidestep votes on two related bills.

Advertisement

Pennsylvania became a focal point of the transgender sports debate in 2022, as UPenn swimmer Lia Thomas competed against female athletes including the University of Kentucky’s Riley Gaines. Since then, conservatives have sought to codify the separation of biological sexes in scholastic sports and public restrooms nationwide.

The top Republican on the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee told Fox News Digital that the scene captured on official video showed the Democratic chairman trying to «re-refer» two bills to the House Health Committee without fully explaining which bills he was citing.

Ranking member Rep. Rob Kauffman, R-Chambersburg, said that Republicans ultimately determined the two bills focused on separating scholastic athletes by biological sex and that Democrats resisted any debate before sending them to another committee to restart the process.

Advertisement

GOP LAWMAKERS, RILEY GAINES SLAM DEMOCRATS FOR VOTING AGAINST PROTECTION OF WOMEN AND GIRLS IN SPORTS ACT

Protesters gather outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 13, 2026, to oppose transgender athletes competing in women’s sports as the court reviews related bans in a landmark case. (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

«It’s fascinating. But the key is, in the legislative process, whether it be on the House floor or in any committee meeting, they’ll say the number of the bill and then they’ll give a title or brief description of the bill before anyone votes on it. You don’t just call up a bill by number,» Kauffman told Fox News Digital in a Tuesday interview.

Advertisement

House Judiciary Committee chairman Timothy Briggs was doing just that in a Monday hearing, Kauffman said.

Briggs, D-King of Prussia, sought to move two bills out of the committee quickly, announcing that all Democrats would vote to re-refer them while identifying the measures only by bill number.

Republicans said they were unaware of the bills’ contents because their titles were not read as Briggs tried to re-refer them to the House Health Committee.

Advertisement

Briggs asked the clerk to call the roll for the «sole purpose of referring [them] to the Health Committee» and added that «all Democrats will be voting ‘Yes’.»

«Could we kinda know what the bills are?» interjected Kauffman, before someone in the gallery called out that they were related to transgender athletes in children’s sports.

HB 158 is the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act from Rep. Barb Gleim, R-Mechanicsburg, and HB 1849 is the related Dads Defending Daughters Act by Rep. Clint Owlett, R-Tioga.

Advertisement

Briggs sighed and began to speak before Kauffman continued.

«We can’t vote on a re-referral when we don’t even know what the title of the bill is. Obviously, you don’t want us to know what the title of the bill is,» he said, chuckling as Briggs cut in that the committee is «running out of time.»

Kauffman quipped that if he ever pulled such a move as chairman, Briggs’ caucus would have «lost your mind.»

Advertisement

DEMOCRATS HAVE LOST THEIR WAY ON WOMEN’S SPORTS – AND HERE’S THE POLITICAL PRICE THEY’LL PAY

After another pointed exchange between Briggs and Kauffman, the Democrat ordered the clerk to call the roll on the bills and then claimed aloud that some Republicans were refusing to vote.

One of those named, Rep. Stephanie Borowicz of Lock Haven, objected after learning the bills’ true identities:

Advertisement

«Now you’re deciding how we’re voting?» said Borowicz, who co-sponsored Gleim’s bill.

«We might as well be better off in the Russian Duma at this point,» Kauffman added as Briggs plowed through their objections and tried to move past the two bills.

The blow-up showed that Democrats are «petrified of this issue [so much] that they broke legislative protocol, parliamentary norms and everything I’ve learned in this legislature in 20 years,» Kauffman told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

He said that if the bills were moved to another committee without first being voted out of his own, the parliamentary «clock» would restart and Democrats could continue moving the measures through committee without taking a direct vote on the underlying transgender sports issue.

Kauffman said the kerfuffle was indicative of the national debate over transgender sports, calling it an «80-90%» issue in favor of separating youth athletes by sex.

ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD MEETING MADNESS CONTINUES AS TENSIONS ESCALATE OVER TRANS ATHLETES IN GIRLS’ SPORTS

Advertisement

Kauffman added that Democrats will eventually have to confront the issue because the state Senate is advancing its own transgender sports bill, which will be taken up by the House.

«It’s a mom and dad issue. It’s a biological fact issue. So we’re going to keep at it,» he said, adding that critics are «cater[ing] to the far-progressive fringe» of their party and «generally don’t care what the people want.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to Briggs for a response to the situation.

A representative for the King of Prussia Democrat said he was «regrettably unavailable» for comment.

The clash came just weeks after a Republican lawmaker’s attempt to define «woman» in a Women’s Month resolution led Democrats to pull the commemoration.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Kiera McDonald contributed to this report.

pennsylvania, sports, senate, bills, republicans, politics

INTERNACIONAL

Mamdani-linked Platner adviser’s history with nude photos surfaces ahead of crucial Senate primary

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Democratic Party campaign strategist who recently went viral for doing damage control for Graham Platner amid his public sexting scandals has past writings that include comments about sending and receiving «nudes» and a footnote in a puberty guide for boys that he wrote, which referenced using images of his own penis.

Advertisement

Morris Katz, an up-and-coming New York City Democratic Party campaign strategist credited with being a major factor in New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s electoral upset last year, wrote on the Medium blogging platform in 2019, amid a separate Democratic Party sexting scandal, that he had both «sent» and «received nudes.» Katz also authored a 2020 puberty guide for boys that included, on page 17, a footnote saying that he initially considered using «images of my penis» to illustrate puberty before the publisher said it was inappropriate.

The resurfaced writings have drawn scrutiny over the last week from Maine Republicans after Katz was accused of trying to contain the fallout from the sexting scandal involving Platner that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women early in his marriage on Kik, an anonymous messaging app that has faced scrutiny over predatory behavior and child-safety concerns.

HOW MUCH BAGGAGE WILL DEMOCRATS ACCEPT FROM MAINE’S GRAHAM PLATNER?

Advertisement

The irony has not gone unnoticed by Republicans in Maine, who argue Katz’s past writings add another bizarre layer to a Platner campaign already struggling to move past allegations involving numerous scandals revolving around the candidate’s judgment.

Morris Katz, 27, has been widely credited with helping New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani complete his upset victory last year against Andrew Cuomo and Curtis Sliwa. (Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Jason Savage, executive director of the Maine Republican Party, told Fox News Digital that the combination of Platner and Katz is «like a sort of weird horror story,» arguing that both men appear unable to recognize «the guardrails of decency.»

Advertisement

«Morris Katz thinking that he was going to call up and intimidate Genevieve McDonald shows how bad his judgement is — he was never going to succeed at that and the fact he didn’t have the instincts to know better is just the first red flag of many for him,» Savage told Fox News Digital. «The combination of Morris Katz and Graham Platner is this weird horror story where neither one of them really understands the guardrails on decency. Neither one of them can recognize when there is a boundary.»

A Republican strategist, who is from rural Maine but wanted to remain anonymous when speaking to Fox News Digital, said the Katz controversy shows national progressive operatives are using Maine as a testing ground for an outsider-backed campaign that could ultimately weaken the seniority and resources incumbent Republican Senator Susan Collins has delivered to struggling communities across the state.

‘MAINE’S MAMDANI’: MAINE GOP CHIEF ISSUES WARNING ABOUT NEW CHALLENGER LOOKING TO OUST SUSAN COLLINS

Advertisement

«This guy [Katz], who is unbelievably strange, comes in from out of state and tries to get this horribly flawed guy, like limping, pleading across the finish line. That is so arrogant,» the GOP strategist said. «The arrogance that it takes to come in and say, ‘I’m an out-of-state progressive socialist here to make some money off a flawed candidate bleeding in the polls,’ and then try to take that away from the people who really need it, you’re going to take away what Susan Collins has done and will be able to do for these people.»

Susan Collins and Graham Platner split

Susan Collins (left) and Graham Platner (right). (Graeme Sloan/Getty Images ; Sophie Park/Getty Images)

Platner’s campaign has been dogged by controversies since he emerged as a progressive challenger in Maine’s closely watched Senate race against incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins.

Some of the most recent firestorms have centered on reports alleging Platner was abusive to an ex-girlfriend and that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women early in his marriage on the platform Kik. Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, reportedly disclosed the messages to campaign officials during an internal vetting process, and the campaign has acknowledged the messages existed while arguing the matter was addressed privately between Platner and his wife.

Advertisement

SENATE CANDIDATE GRAHAM PLATNER SENT EXPLICIT TEXTS TO MULTIPLE WOMEN WHILE MARRIED, WIFE SAYS: REPORT

The controversy intensified after reports that Platner still had an active profile on Kik, an anonymous messaging app that has faced criticism from child-safety groups and law enforcement officials. The profile reportedly featured a shirtless mirror selfie of Platner with a towel around his waist, which Republican staffers later appeared to mock outside the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee by showing up in towels.

NRSC staffers protest Platner

Republican staffers, including National Republican Senatorial Committee staffers, protest outside the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., wearing towels to mock Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner’s reported Kik profile photo. (Nicholas Ballasy/Fox News Digital)

Platner had already faced scrutiny over a tattoo that critics identified as a Nazi-linked symbol, which he later covered up. Platner has said he was unaware of the symbol’s association with Nazis when he got the tattoo years ago, although McDonald has contested he has been aware of its meaning for some time.

Advertisement

Platner also apologized after old Reddit posts resurfaced in which he made a series of inflammatory comments about rape, race, political violence, police, rural Americans and military veterans. Platner has said his views have changed and that some of his past comments reflected a darker period in his life after military service.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

More recently, Platner denied allegations from a former girlfriend who accused him of abusive behavior, calling the claims politically motivated. His campaign has accused critics and national media outlets of focusing on private matters and personal attacks rather than the issues affecting Maine voters.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to Katz, the Platner campaign, Fight Agency, Mamdani’s team and McDonald for comment.

sex crimes, fund raising, zohran mamdani, republicans, campaigning

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

El caso Lyhanna: Francia cuestiona la justicia tras el asesinato de una niña de 11 años y las fallas en la investigación de su presunto asesino

Published

on


El caso de pedofilia y asesinato de Lyhanna, que había cumplido 11 años, con el padre de una de sus amigas como principal sospechoso, conmueve a Francia e interpela la lentitud y eficacia de la justicia francesa. Los magistrados y fiscales no se movilizaron con rapidez ni interés en el caso, ni declararon la alerta inmediata.

Tras una marcha silenciosa, que congregó el domingo a 6.000 personas en Fleurance, Gers, para rendir homenaje a Lyhanna —cuyo cuerpo fue identificado en un silo agrícola donde trabajaba el asesino—, el ministro de Justicia, Gérald Darmanin, se dirigió a los procuradores.

Advertisement

Pidió a los fiscales, reunidos el lunes por la mañana en el Ministerio de Justicia, «una revisión de las denuncias de menores víctimas de violencia sexual antes de mediados de julio», priorizando los casos en los que las víctimas son menores de edad.

La justicia cuestionada

Tras este «terrible fracaso», Darmanin hizo un llamamiento a la movilización general. Explicó en conferencia de prensa que había pedido a los magistrados que «reconocieran las deficiencias, cuando existieran».

Advertisement

Desde el hallazgo del cuerpo de la niña de 11 años y la revelación de las acusaciones de violación contra el sospechoso, el ministro de Justicia ha denunciado reiteradamente las «inaceptables» disfunciones del sistema judicial. Asociaciones feministas y de protección infantil también convocaron manifestaciones frente a los juzgados el lunes.

Jérôme Barella, el sospechoso de haberla asesinado, ya tenía casos por violación a menores que no habían sido investigados.

El hermano también está detenido

Advertisement

El hermano de Jérôme Barella se encuentra bajo custodia policial, sospechoso de violar a su expareja.

El minisro de Justicia francés, Gerald Darmanin. Foto: Reuters

«La información que recibo me lleva a creer que ha habido un grave fallo en el sistema de justicia pública», afirmó el ministro Gérald Darmanin. «Diré toda la verdad, sin ocultar nada al pueblo francés», aseguró y anunció que no renunciará a su cargo de ministro.

Tensiones políticas y judiciales

La ley Darmanin sobre justicia penal está impactada por el caso Lyhanna. En enero, en una entrevista con Le Figaro, Gérald Darmanin prometió que su plan de justicia penal «reduciría a la mitad la acumulación de casos».

Advertisement

Menos de seis meses después, esta legislación, destinada a aliviar la carga de los tribunales, adquiere una resonancia particularmente significativa con el asesinato de Lyhanna, que ha puesto de manifiesto las disfunciones de un sistema judicial sobrecargado en Francia.

El proyecto de ley sobre justicia penal y respeto a las víctimas llega a comisión en la Asamblea Nacional este lunes. Presionado por el caso Lyhanna —el viernes ofreció sus «disculpas en nombre de la justicia»—, el ministro de Justicia tendrá la difícil tarea de convencer a los parlamentarios para que voten a favor de su proyecto de ley, que ha provocado una gran indignación entre los abogados.

Esta es la primera parte de la denominada ley «SURE» (sanciones útiles, rápidas y efectivas).

Advertisement

La lucha contra la violencia sexual

La lucha contra la violencia sexual y de género, para la cual cerca de cien parlamentarios de todo el espectro político presentaron un proyecto de ley marco a finales de 2025 —y que el caso Lyhanna ha reavivado—, debe ser una «tarea de gran envergadura», según la Fundación de Mujeres.

'En memoria de Lyhanna', reza la remera de una mujer durante la marcha en Fleurance. Foto: EFE

«Ya no queremos medidas a medias, leyes aprobadas con prisas ni soluciones provisionales. Hemos aceptado esto durante demasiado tiempo en los últimos diez años, en los que hemos denunciado la violencia contra las mujeres y los niños: lo que necesitamos es una tarea de gran envergadura, una reforma integral», declaró Anne-Cécile Mailfert, presidenta de la asociación, el lunes.

El proyecto de ley número 2169, impulsado por la diputada socialista Céline Thiébaut-Martinez, de Seine-et-Marne, y basado en 140 recomendaciones de organizaciones feministas —»con el objetivo de combatir de forma integral la violencia sexista y sexual contra las mujeres y los niños»—, se presentó el 2 de diciembre de 2025. Consta de 79 artículos.

Advertisement

El caso de Lyhanna, la estudiante de secundaria de 11 años hallada muerta el viernes en la región de Gers, ha reavivado el debate.

Magistrados furiosos

Un sindicato de magistrados denunció ataques «inaceptables» y cuestionó al ministro Darmanin. Es «inaceptable» que los magistrados «sean señalados y objeto de escarnio público y amenazas», antes de que se conozcan los resultados de la investigación administrativa iniciada tras la desaparición de Lyhanna, declaró el lunes el presidente del Sindicato de Magistrados (USM), en una inusual carta dirigida al ministro de Justicia.

Advertisement

«La muerte de una niña es una tragedia absoluta. Debemos a las familias y a la ciudadanía transparencia respecto a las circunstancias estructurales y fácticas que contribuyeron a ella», escribió Ludovic Friat a Gérald Darmanin, cuya «responsabilidad política», según él, «sigue siendo completa».

El presidente del USM, el sindicato mayoritario de magistrados, acusó al ministro de Justicia de haber «designado ya a los responsables y anunciado sanciones disciplinarias» antes del inicio de la investigación de la Inspección General de Justicia, una «presión deliberada» ejercida sobre él.

Gérald Darmanin señaló la «lentitud» y la «falta de priorización». «En el caso específico de Lyhanna, no se trata de una cuestión de recursos», afirmó. «No es la falta de recursos lo que impidió tomar decisiones en este caso concreto. La fiscalía de Auch recibió recursos adicionales el pasado septiembre. Además, el proceso es lento. Se trata más bien de esta lentitud y la falta de priorización», añadió. «La información que recibo me lleva a creer que ha habido un grave fallo en el sistema de justicia pública», declaró.

Advertisement

Un pedófilo nunca investigado

Jérôme Barella, principal sospechoso del asesinato de Lyhanna, es objeto de al menos seis denuncias y dos informes.

¿Cuántas víctimas potenciales? Antes del asesinato de Lyhanna, por el que fue acusado de secuestro y detención ilegal, Jérôme Barella era objeto de varias denuncias por violación y agresión sexual a menores, las cuales fueron desestimadas o por las que nunca fue interrogado.

Advertisement

La revelación de denuncias anteriores a la desaparición de la niña desató una controversia nacional sobre las deficiencias del sistema judicial. Este hombre de 40 años, trabajador temporal y exempleado polivalente en escuelas, es objeto de seis denuncias, dos informes y un procedimiento disciplinario.

El primer caso conocido en su contra data de diciembre de 2017. En ese momento, la madre de una estudiante de secundaria de 17 años, que asistía a la escuela donde Jérôme Barella trabajaba como personal de mantenimiento, presentó una denuncia. Esta madre denunció una relación entre su hija menor de edad y este hombre, que tenía 32 años en ese entonces. El caso se cerró dos meses después, en febrero de 2018, luego de que la joven asegurara a los investigadores que la relación había sido consensuada.

Entre 2018 y 2021, Jérôme Barella fue contratado como personal de mantenimiento en varios institutos del departamento de Gers. En 2020, mientras trabajaba en el instituto Maréchal-Lannes de Lectoure, fue objeto de un procedimiento disciplinario, «tras una denuncia por comportamiento inapropiado hacia una alumna», según la región de Occitania. Su despido se anunció en 2021.

Advertisement

En enero de 2022, la fiscalía de Béthune, en el distrito de Pas-de-Calais, abrió un procedimiento contra Jérôme Barella tras una denuncia por «violación de una menor de 15 años». Esta denuncia se refería a presuntos actos cometidos en 2020 contra una niña de 7 años, en el domicilio del acusado, en Montestruc-sur-Gers. Sin embargo, en mayo de 2024, el caso fue desestimado por «falta de pruebas suficientes». Este miércoles, Clémence Meyer, fiscal de Auch, indicó que la denuncia será «reexaminada a la luz de nuevas pruebas».

En el verano de 2025, la fiscalía de Toulouse abrió un tercer caso contra Jérôme Barella, tras la denuncia presentada por los padres de una niña, nacida en 2021. La víctima, amiga de la hija del acusado, denunció violaciones cometidas «entre septiembre de 2024 y mayo de 2025 en el domicilio» del hombre en Montestruc-sur-Gers.

Esta denuncia por «violación de una menor de 15 años» se registró el 22 de agosto de 2025 en la comisaría de gendarmería de Plaisance-du-Touch, Haute-Garonne, donde se habían mudado los padres de la víctima. Según la fiscalía de Toulouse, la niña fue entrevistada tras la presentación de la denuncia y examinada por un psicólogo. Sin embargo, Jérôme Barella no fue ni entrevistado ni interrogado.

Advertisement

Según una fuente cercana al caso, el hombre, de unos cuarenta años, sabía que era el objetivo de la investigación. Acosó a los padres de la presunta víctima y les rogó que retiraran la denuncia, alegando que sentía un gran afecto por su hija.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Obama-appointed judge who blocked Trump birthright citizenship order strikes again, throws out visa overhaul

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An Obama-appointed federal judge who previously blocked President Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order has again dealt a major setback to the administration by striking down Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa payment requirement and declaring the policy unlawful.

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin of Massachusetts ruled Monday that the Trump administration lacked the authority to impose the hefty payment on employers seeking new H-1B visas, finding that the requirement amounted to a tax that only Congress has the constitutional power to impose.

In Monday’s 42-page decision, Sorokin sided with a coalition of 20 states that challenged Trump’s September 2025 proclamation creating a new $100,000 payment requirement for employers filing petitions for foreign workers under the H-1B visa program, which allows U.S. employers to hire skilled foreign workers. Approximately 65,000 foreign workers are issued a H-1B visa each year.

TRUMP’S $100K H-1B VISA OVERHAUL COULD HIT TECH GIANTS LIKE AMAZON AND MICROSOFT HARDEST

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. (Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Before Trump’s proclamation, employers typically paid between $2,000 and $5,000 in filing fees to sponsor an H-1B worker, depending on the type of application and the size of the company.

The administration had argued that the measure was necessary to curb abuse of the visa system and protect American workers.

Advertisement

Trump’s proclamation stated that the H-1B program had been exploited to replace U.S. workers with lower-paid foreign labor and that the new payment would help address those concerns.

Sorokin rejected the administration’s legal justification, finding that the Immigration and Nationality Act gives presidents broad authority over the entry of noncitizens but does not authorize them to impose taxes.

«While the Executive has broad discretion over the admission and exclusion of aliens, … that discretion is not boundless,» Sorokin wrote, referring to previous case law.

Advertisement

Sorokin concluded that the payment functioned as a tax rather than a permissible immigration restriction.

TRUMP IS DOWN BUT NOT OUT IN COURT BATTLE OVER HARVARD’S FOREIGN STUDENT VISAS

«The Court finds that the Policy imposes a tax on H-1B petitions without the requisite delegation by Congress,» Sorokin wrote.

Advertisement

He further rejected the administration’s argument that the payment requirement was simply another immigration restriction, bluntly stating: «Taxes are not ‘restrictions.’»

Beyond the constitutional concerns, Sorokin also found that federal agencies violated the Administrative Procedure Act by implementing the policy without notice-and-comment rule making and concluded that the agencies exceeded their statutory authority.

As a remedy, Sorokin declared the policy unlawful and vacated it in its entirety.

Advertisement
Signage for the US Department of State outside headquarters building in Washington DC

Signage for the U.S. Department of State is displayed outside its headquarters in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington, D.C., on April 15, 2025. (Jim Watson/AFP)

Sorokin, a Yale and Columbia Law School graduate, was nominated to the federal bench by President Barack Obama in 2013 and confirmed by the Senate in 2014. Last year, Sorokin was the fourth judge to issue a nationwide injunction blocking Trump’s executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship. He ruled that the policy is likely unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. That dispute has since reached the Supreme Court, and a ruling is expected in the coming weeks.

The administration is expected to appeal Sorokin’s decision, setting up another legal battle over the scope of presidential authority in immigration matters and the limits of executive power.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«President Trump has clear legal authority to restrict entry of any class of aliens he determines is not in America’s best interests, and that is exactly what he did,» White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Fox News Digital. «The H-1B program has been abused for decades, and President Trump finally took action to fix it. A federal judge in Washington already upheld a nearly identical order, and the Administration is confident this order will be reversed on appeal.»

In a separate challenge filed in December 2025, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington declined to block the policy after dismissing claims from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that the additional H-1B charge violated federal immigration law.

Advertisement

federal courts, immigration, congress, donald trump, federal judges, taxes, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias