Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

DC murder rate sees astonishing turnaround as Trump team credits federal crackdown

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Washington, D.C.’s homicide count has dropped sharply this year, falling by roughly half compared to the same period in 2025, as the Trump administration points to an aggressive federal crackdown in the nation’s capital.

Advertisement

The administration has credited the appointment of U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, a surge of federal agents and the deployment of National Guard troops with driving the decline. But criminologists say similar drops are playing out nationwide and caution that it is difficult to tie the improvement to any single policy, setting up a debate over what is actually behind the shift.

There have been 20 murders at this point in 2026, compared to 42 in the same timeframe in 2025, alongside Pirro’s tough enforcement posture and an increased visible law enforcement presence. The nation’s murder rate overall is at its lowest since 1900, which President Donald Trump has credited to his border policies.

As for D.C., the White House said that Trump’s crime task force has yielded «tremendous results for the community.»

Advertisement

SCOOP: WHITE HOUSE TOUTS GUNS AND DRUG HAUL REMOVED FROM DC STREETS AS TRUMP’S CRIME BLITZ NETS 550 ARRESTS

National Guardsmen patrol the District of Columbia in 2026. (Mandel Ngan/Getty Images)

«Crime has dropped across the board, dangerous criminals have been removed from the streets, missing children have been recovered, illegal weapons have been confiscated, and more,» said spokeswoman Abigail Jackson, crediting the president’s «bold actions in D.C.» for reduced crime and saying «residents are thankful.»

Advertisement

But Thaddeus Johnson, a senior fellow at the Council on Criminal Justice and a criminology professor at Georgia State University, said it is difficult to attribute the decline to any single factor.

«Crackdowns can have an effect,» Johnson said in an interview, though he noted that Washington, D.C., has struggled with court backlogs and delayed cases in recent years, which may have contributed to higher crime rates. He said recent progress in clearing the backlog has allowed prosecutions to move forward and taken offenders off the streets.

‘RESISTANCE’ LEFT BLASTED BY WASHINGTON POST AS MAYOR BOWSER BACKS TRUMP’S DC CRIME PLAN

Advertisement

Johnson acknowledged that aggressive prosecutions by Pirro and others have likely deterred some crime.

«If you’re prosecuting cases, you know that the deterrence is not only the severity of punishment, but it’s the celerity or the swiftness of punishment and the certainty of it — the certainty of punishment is more important than the severity.»

He emphasized that he is not discounting Pirro or the National Guard deployment, but said it is difficult to identify any single action as a «magic bullet,» particularly as other cities across the country are also seeing declines.

Advertisement

Johnson added that Washington was still grappling with elevated robbery rates as recently as 2024, including incidents occurring outside traditionally high-crime areas in Southeast and shifting into neighborhoods such as the Wharf and Navy Yard, a revitalized nightlife corridor across the Anacostia River.

«I haven’t seen anything per se, evidence directly, where I can say, ‘well, yeah, it’s due to the prosecutions and the judges’ as to why these crimes are going down when we started seeing that many of the crimes had started going down already,» he said.

«It’s hard to say that it didn’t play a part … particularly when we see similar patterns across the nation.»

Advertisement

TRUMP’S DC PUBLIC SAFETY SWEEP RESULTS IN 23 ARRESTS INCLUDING MURDER SUSPECT ON OPENING DAY

The White House’s claims of success in reducing crime in Washington contrast with earlier warnings from critics that the National Guard deployment would backfire.

District of Columbia at-large councilmember Robert White Jr. warned at the outset that it is abnormal to see armed guardsmen in an American city:

Advertisement

«It’s hard to explain to my kids, who are 6 and 9, what’s happening here. It’s an occupation because it’s both unwelcome and unwarranted. It’s also unhelpful. But I don’t think it’s meant to be helpful in any way,» White told Governing News in September.

The Democrat added local officials «have an obligation to be clear that this is going to make crime worse in the coming years.»

Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from adjacent Takoma Park, Maryland, similarly predicted the surge was a bad idea:

Advertisement

«No one in Washington is asking Trump to deploy the National Guard or take over the MPD. This is a phony, manufactured crisis if I’ve ever seen one,» Raskin said in August. «Since taking office, Trump has repeatedly undermined public safety in our nation’s capital.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries also said last fall that Trump was acting like a «wannabe king» whose «unleash[ing of] the national guard on the city’s youth and homeless population has no basis in law and will put the safety of the people of our nation’s capital in danger.»

Advertisement

Fox News’ Elise Oggioni contributed to this report.

washington dc, blue city crime, white house, washington, homicide, politics

INTERNACIONAL

Jack Smith’s Senate phone records probe turns to Verizon’s handling of subpoenas

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: The Senate investigation into former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s «Arctic Frost» probe is widening, as Republican lawmakers question Verizon’s handling of subpoenas for senators’ phone records after the telecom giant failed to disclose one during an earlier congressional records search.

Advertisement

As part of Operation Arctic Frost — the codename for the FBI’s Trump-election-interference probe with Smith placed at the helm — prosecutors subpoenaed Verizon and other phone carriers for toll records tied to members of Congress and other Republican figures. Several conservative entities were swept up in the probe, including the late Charlie Kirk.

Verizon later acknowledged omitting Smith’s subpoena from its congressional record search.

The dispute centers less on Verizon’s compliance with the subpoena than on what the company knew afterward, whether it should have notified Congress and why it failed to disclose the subpoena during an earlier records search.

Advertisement

BIDEN SPECIAL COUNSEL’S ‘RUNAWAY TRAIN’ SCOOPED UP SENSITIVE LAWMAKER INFO: ‘ABUSE OF POWER’

The Senate investigation into former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s «Arctic Frost» probe is widening.  (Getty Images)

Smith’s investigation has faced increased scrutiny in recent months, and now Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa — whose records were among those obtained — and a slew of his colleagues want to know what Verizon knew, when it knew it and whether the company should have notified affected members of Congress after turning over their phone records to Smith’s team.

Advertisement

«Jack Smith oversaw a sweeping and unprecedented investigation that swept-up records from hundreds of Republican entities, including the phone toll records and text messages from myself and dozens of my colleagues,» Grassley told Fox News Digital Friday.

Toll records are essentially the metadata of a telephone call — and exclude the contents of the conversation. They often include the phone numbers involved, date, time, duration and often the operative cell-tower location.

MAJOR PHONE CARRIERS REVEAL JACK SMITH’S SUBPOENAS FOR REPUBLICAN SENATORS’ RECORDS

Advertisement

«Congress deserves to know the full picture of how Smith carried out Arctic Frost so it never happens again.»

«As part of our investigation, we need to fully understand what Verizon knew about Smith’s subpoenas, when they became aware members were impacted and why the company didn’t inform members like they were supposed to,» he said.

In a Thursday letter to Verizon CEO Daniel Schulman, Grassley, Senate Investigations Subcommittee chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and more than a dozen senators said they remain concerned not only by the alleged «abuse of power by federal government actors… but also with Verizon’s disclosures of (m)embers’ phone records pursuant to a May 25, 2023, subpoena (and) its failure to disclose this information to affected Members.»

Advertisement

JACK SMITH THRUST BACK INTO SPOTLIGHT AT BLANCHE HEARING OVER EXPOSED SENATORS’ MESSAGES’

Verizon store in New York

In its original October 2023 response to Grassley, Verizon wrote that it often limits retention of legal processes received to a period of four years, and attested it had no records to produce prior to October 2019. (Gabby Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Of the signatories, Sens. Bill Hagerty IV and Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., Rick Scott, R-Fla., Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., Mike Lee, R-Utah, Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Josh Hawley, R-Mo., John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss., also had their phone toll records or text messages swept up by Smith.

Their inquiry noted he asked Verizon in October 2023 to identify Justice Department or other federal law enforcement requests involving Senate devices used by his staff dating back to 2016.

Advertisement

The senator wrote that the subpoena was not disclosed in Verizon’s initial response, and Grassley said Congress did not learn of it until Verizon acknowledged in 2025 that «human error» had caused its omission.

In its original October 2023 response to Grassley, Verizon wrote that it often limits retention of legal processes received to a period of four years, and attested it had no records to produce prior to October 2019.

«This raises questions as to whether Verizon discovered legal process from DOJ for Senate devices and lines, including the May 2023 Arctic Frost subpoena, in its search from October 1, 2019, to October 27, 2023, for responsive records to Chairman Grassley’s request,» Grassley wrote in his new letter.

Advertisement

Therefore, Grassley and 15 other senators are demanding Verizon brass explain when they first learned Smith’s subpoena sought phone records that included members of Congress and when they discovered it had provided «tolling data» connected to those members and transmitted it to Smith.

Fox News Digital reached out to Verizon for comment.

Grassley’s new letter suggests the October 2023 exchange may be the key to determining whether Verizon merely missed the subpoena or discovered it and failed to disclose it.

Advertisement

«On what date were Daniel Schulman, Vandana Venkatesh, Hans Vestberg, and Craig Silliman first informed about the May 25, 2023, subpoena?» they asked of Verizon’s front office.

The senators also asked that Verizon explain its «human error» revelation in more specificity and produce internal records from May 2023 to October 2025 that discuss whether the company believed it was obligated to notify the implicated members of Congress or the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms (SAA).

The «human error» explanation also left unanswered why Smith’s May 25, 2023, «Arctic Frost» subpoena was omitted from Verizon’s review of legal process involving SAA phone lines, even though the company acknowledged that two SAA numbers were included in the subpoena.

Advertisement

In 2025, documents provided to Grassley revealed Verizon complied with Smith while AT&T resisted the requests.

SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

However, both subpoenas were accompanied by gag orders signed by Obama-appointed District of Columbia federal Judge James Boasberg, a frequent foil of President Donald Trump’s. Boasberg directed Verizon and AT&T not to disclose the subpoenas to lawmakers for a period of one year.

Advertisement

The DOJ has issued subpoenas for lawmakers’ information in the past, but former inspector general Michael Horowitz cautioned against it except in limited circumstances in a report published in 2025, saying that doing so «risks chilling Congress’s ability to conduct oversight of the executive branch.»

Grassley’s letter gives Verizon until Aug. 13 to explain when it knew senators’ records were involved, who inside the company was informed and why the May 2023 subpoena did not surface in its earlier response to Congress.

Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans have branded Smith’s «Arctic Frost» as «worse than Watergate.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to counsel for Smith for comment.

senate elections, verizon, justice department, congress, chuck grassley, joe biden, donald trump, republicans

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

El Ejército de Kuwait anunció que sus defensas respondieron a un ataque de Irán con drones

Published

on


El Ejército de Kuwait anunció que sus defensas respondieron a un ataque de Irán con drones (Europa Press)

Las defensas aéreas de Kuwait respondieron a ataques con drones tras una reciente agresión por parte de Irán este sábado contra su territorio, según informó el Estado Mayor del Ejército. En ese sentido, la institución señaló que cualquier explosión que fuera escuchada correspondía a la interceptación de estos ataques por parte de los sistemas de defensa aérea.

Advertisement

Las autoridades instaron la población, vía redes sociales, a seguir las instrucciones de seguridad emitidas por los organismos competentes.

El viernes, la agencia de noticias Fars, vinculada a la Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica de Irán, incluyó importantes instalaciones energéticas de la región del Golfo Pérsico e Israel en una lista de posibles objetivos de represalia iraní, en medio del aumento de tensiones con Estados Unidos.

El informe menciona como potenciales blancos el yacimiento petrolífero de Ghawar en Arabia Saudita, las instalaciones de Abqaiq y Khurais, la refinería de Ruwais y el yacimiento petrolífero de Zakum en Emiratos Árabes Unidos, el yacimiento de GNL de North Field y Ras Laffan en Qatar, el yacimiento petrolífero de Burgan en Kuwait, la refinería de Sitra en Bahréin y los yacimientos de gas Leviathan y Tamar en Israel.

Advertisement
 Drones iraníes se exhiben durante una ceremonia de incorporación de nuevos drones a la organización de combate del Ejército iraní en un lugar no revelado en Irán (WANA vía REUTERS/Archivo)
Drones iraníes se exhiben durante una ceremonia de incorporación de nuevos drones a la organización de combate del Ejército iraní en un lugar no revelado en Irán (WANA vía REUTERS/Archivo)

El medio recordó también ataques anteriores durante el conflicto, señalando que, tras la ofensiva contra las instalaciones de gas de South Pars en Irán, Teherán respondió con un ataque contra las instalaciones de gas de Ras Laffan en Qatar. El régimen también suele bombardear la base aérea Ahmed Al Jaber en Kuwait, ya que alberga fuerzas militares estadounidenses.

Respecto a la campaña militar de EEUU en Medio Oriente, el Comando Central de Estados Unidos (CENTCOM) informó el viernes que las fuerzas estadounidenses desviaron 30 buques mercantes, inutilizado dos y abordado otros dos como parte de los esfuerzos para hacer cumplir el bloqueo naval contra Irán. Además, se permitió el paso de casi 30 barcos que transportaban ayuda humanitaria.

“Un helicóptero MH-60R Sea Hawk de la Armada de EEUU se prepara para volar a bordo del USS Michael Murphy (DDG 112), mientras el buque de guerra apoya el bloqueo estadounidense contra Irán navegando en aguas regionales. Al 31 de julio, el CENTCOM había desviado 30 buques comerciales, inmovilizado 2 y abordado 2 para garantizar el pleno cumplimiento. Las fuerzas armadas estadounidenses también han permitido que casi 30 barcos atraviesen el bloqueo para brindar ayuda humanitaria”, publicó el CENTCOM en X.

En paralelo, los dos primeros aviones militares de Estados Unidos destinados a brindar apoyo a las operaciones en Medio Oriente arribaron el viernes a una base aérea en el sureste de Bulgaria, lo que provocó una queja de Irán y protestas de residentes búlgaros.

Advertisement
La presencia de las fuerzas estadounidenses en Bulgaria tiene permiso para permanecer hasta el 1 de octubre de 2026, según el pedido de la embajada de Estados Unidos (Reuters)
La presencia de las fuerzas estadounidenses en Bulgaria tiene permiso para permanecer hasta el 1 de octubre de 2026, según el pedido de la embajada de Estados Unidos (Reuters)

La administración del presidente Donald Trump ha enfrentado resistencia de algunos aliados europeos por el uso de bases aéreas en respaldo a la guerra con Irán. Bulgaria, miembro de la OTAN y la Unión Europea, aprobó a principios de julio el despliegue de hasta ocho aviones cisterna KC-135 estadounidenses, junto a 250 efectivos con armas personales, municiones y equipos para el aeródromo en la Base Aérea de Bezmer.

De acuerdo con un tratado de defensa bilateral firmado en 2006, la instalación de Bezmer —ubicada a unos 260 kilómetros al sureste de Sofía— es de uso conjunto, y cualquier nuevo uso requiere aprobación parlamentaria. El despliegue, solicitado por la embajada estadounidense en Bulgaria, está autorizado hasta el 1 de octubre de 2026.

El inquilino de la Casa Blanca agradeció al primer ministro búlgaro Rumen Radev en una publicación en Truth Social por permitir el despliegue “a pesar de las amenazas de Irán”.



Middle East

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Qatar pidió al grupo terrorista Hamas que el acuerdo de desarme ponga fin al “sufrimiento” en la Franja de Gaza

Published

on


El primer ministro qatarí y ministro de Exteriores, el jeque Mohamed bin Abdulrahman (Europa Press/Archivo)

El primer ministro y titular de Exteriores de Qatar, Mohamed bin Abdulrahman, expresó el viernes en una conversación telefónica al líder del grupo terrorista Hamas, Khalil Al-Hayya, su esperanza de que el acuerdo sobre el desarme del movimiento ponga fin al sufrimiento en la Franja de Gaza.

Advertisement

Bin Abdulrahman celebró la decisión de Hamas de “aceptar la hoja de ruta para completar la implementación de la segunda fase del acuerdo de alto el fuego en la Franja de Gaza”, según informó la cartera de Exteriores en un comunicado. El jefe de la diplomacia qatarí manifestó su deseo de que este paso contribuya “a poner fin al sufrimiento del pueblo palestino y a lograr sus aspiraciones de seguridad y estabilidad».

El ministro subrayó la necesidad de que la comunidad internacional asuma sus responsabilidades y pida a Israel que cumpla con sus obligaciones en virtud del acuerdo, lo que llevaría a garantizar la culminación de la hoja de ruta y el logro de la paz y la estabilidad en Gaza.

Qatar actúa como uno de los principales mediadores en el conflicto entre Israel y el grupo terrorista, especialmente en la guerra de Gaza, en coordinación con Egipto, Estados Unidos y Turquía.

Advertisement

Por su parte, el ministerio de Exteriores de Arabia Saudita expresó su satisfacción por el anuncio del presidente estadounidense Donald Trump sobre el “histórico acuerdo relativo a la desmilitarización de la Franja de Gaza”. Arabia Saudita agradeció a Egipto, Qatar, Turquía, Estados Unidos, a la Junta de Paz y a todos los socios involucrados en los esfuerzos que permitieron avanzar hacia este acuerdo.

La ONU celebró el acuerdo para el desarme de Hamas (Europa Press)
La ONU celebró el acuerdo para el desarme de Hamas (Europa Press)

Riad recalcó “la importancia de la retirada completa de las fuerzas israelíes de la Franja de Gaza, el despliegue de una fuerza internacional de estabilización y la garantía del flujo continuo e ininterrumpido de ayuda humanitaria y apoyo a la reconstrucción para el pueblo palestino”.

Además, secretario general de la ONU, António Guterres, calificó la confirmación del acuerdo como “la única buena noticia en días recientes” en una región marcada por la guerra. “El acuerdo anunciado por el presidente de Estados Unidos para que Hamas entregue sus armas y para que Israel retire sus fuerzas de Gaza es la única buena noticia en días recientes”, afirmó Guterres.

El titular de Naciones Unidas advirtió que “lo que había comenzado como un conflicto regional hace seis meses se convirtió en un motivo de inestabilidad global”. Guterres subrayó ante la prensa la necesidad de poner fin a los combates “en todos los frentes” de la región.

Advertisement

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, anunció el viernes que la Junta de Paz creada para resolver conflictos, comenzando por el de Gaza, alcanzó un acuerdo para el “desarme total” de Hamás y otros grupos armados palestinos en el enclave, calificándolo como un paso “histórico” hacia la creación de un nuevo gobierno en la Franja.

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, hace un gesto mientras participa en una reunión del gabinete en Camp David, en Thurmont, Maryland (EE. UU.), el 31 de julio de 2026 (REUTERS/Daniel Heuer)
El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, hace un gesto mientras participa en una reunión del gabinete en Camp David, en Thurmont, Maryland (EE. UU.), el 31 de julio de 2026 (REUTERS/Daniel Heuer)

A su vez, declaró que Israel está “muy contento” con el acuerdo.Tenemos un entendimiento con Israel. Israel está muy contento con esto. Israel nos ayudó y se ha portado muy bien”, afirmó Trump a periodistas en la residencia presidencial de Camp David.

Sin embargo, más temprano, el ministro de Seguridad Nacional israelí, Itamar Ben Gvir, calificó como “inaceptable” el acuerdo, que prevé una retirada progresiva de Israel del territorio palestino. “Detener los combates contra el movimiento islamista palestino equivale a aceptar que Hamas prepare la próxima masacre”, escribió Ben Gvir en Telegram, aludiendo a los ataques del 7 de octubre de 2023, en los que murieron 1.221 personas. “Israel debe ganar”, añadió.

Por su parte, Hamas confirmó el acuerdo para su desarme y aseguró que incluye “la obligación de Israel de retirarse de la Franja de Gaza”, luego del anuncio realizado por Trump. El negociador de Hamas, Ghazi Hamad, explicó a medios árabes que el pacto contempla “la obligación de la ocupación de retirarse de la Franja de Gaza, abrir los cruces fronterizos y cesar los asesinatos”. Hamad advirtió: “Si Israel no cumple el acuerdo, nosotros tampoco lo cumpliremos”.

Advertisement

(Con información de EFE)



climate,conflict,diplomacy,energy,government,politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias