Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Army cuts helicopters, pushes ‘Amazon for war’ as drone combat reshapes military

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Army leaders signaled Wednesday that drone-heavy warfare and recent conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East are reshaping the service’s aviation and missile defense strategy, driving new scrutiny of helicopter programs and costly Patriot interceptor systems.

Advertisement

The comments come as the Army’s fiscal year 2027 budget request sharply cuts the funding request for helicopter procurement, including reducing Apache funding from roughly $361.7 million to about $1.5 million, Black Hawk funding from about $913 million to roughly $39.3 million and Chinook procurement from roughly $629 million to about $210 million, while increasing investment in drones, autonomy and low-cost battlefield technologies.

The transformation push is already extending beyond procurement. The Army previously announced plans to cut roughly 6,500 active-duty aviation positions over fiscal years 2026 and 2027 — including pilots, flight crews and maintainers — as leaders shift resources toward unmanned systems and drone warfare.

It remains unclear whether the procurement reductions ultimately will shrink aviation fleet sizes, extend the service life of aging aircraft or delay planned replacement cycles.

Advertisement

Army leaders suggested the battlefield lessons driving the changes are already shaping budget decisions, as the service redirects money away from some traditional aviation programs toward drones, autonomy and low-cost mass systems.

«Absolutely, as we look across the aviation portfolio … we’re re-looking that,» Assistant Army Secretary Brent Ingraham said during a Pentagon media roundtable Wednesday. 

Ingraham said the Army is reassessing how traditional manned aircraft fit alongside larger unmanned systems increasingly capable of missions once handled by helicopters.

Advertisement

The proposed aviation cuts already have drawn concern on Capitol Hill. 

During a recent Senate Armed Services Committee hearing May 12, Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., warned that the Army’s budget request included «zero H-64 Apaches, zero Chinook Block IIs and one UH-60 Black Hawk,» arguing the service was divesting critical capabilities before validating replacements.

«Your department’s budget request cuts over $5 billion from the industrial base in the aviation sector alone, effectively shutting down all current Army aviation platforms,» Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, pressed War Secretary Pete Hegseth during a May 12 House Appropriations hearing. «How did the department arrive at the conclusion that reducing procurement for these Army aviation platforms strengthens rather than weakens the aviation industrial base?»

Advertisement

Hegseth acknowledged the Pentagon was reconsidering parts of the plan.

«There are some very good things in the Army Transformation Initiative, and there are some things that we’ve needed to get another look at,» Hegseth told lawmakers during a House hearing after facing questions about the scale of the aviation cuts.

Hegseth said Pentagon leaders were focused on ensuring the Army does not create «aviation capability gaps» as it transitions toward more unmanned systems and next-generation technologies.

Advertisement

Army leaders signaled Wednesday that drone-heavy warfare and recent conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East are reshaping the service’s aviation and missile defense strategy, driving new scrutiny of helicopter programs and costly Patriot interceptor systems. (Al Drago/Reuters:Stephen Wormuth/Reuters)

‘EYES IN THE SKY’: ARMY DRONE EXPERT EXPLAINS US STRATEGY ON INNOVATION AS GLOBAL CONFLICT LOOMS

Army leaders said the rapid spread of cheap drones is forcing the Army to rethink how it buys and fields aircraft, missile defenses and battlefield technology.

Advertisement

«We know we don’t want to continue to use a Patriot missile to shoot down a cheap drone,» Ingraham said. «You’ve got to get on the right side of the cost curve.»

The concern has become increasingly urgent after the U.S. and its allies burned through large numbers of expensive missile defense interceptors during the Israel-Iran conflict and broader Middle East operations, fueling Pentagon concerns about stockpile depletion and the long-term sustainability of relying on multimillion-dollar defensive systems against cheap drones and missiles. 

Drones flying in the sky during activation of unmanned aircraft battalion in Tolemaida Colombia

The Colombian army activated its first unmanned aircraft battalion at the military base in Tolemaida, Colombia, on Oct. 10, 2025, to counter illegal armed groups using drones in conflict. (Raul Arboleda/AFP)

Officials also described a new allied drone and counter-drone procurement marketplace designed to speed foreign military sales and standardize interoperable systems across partner nations. Driscoll compared the effort to «an Amazon for war.»

Advertisement

Officials said the marketplace is expected to become available to roughly 25 U.S. allies and partners worldwide, initially focused on drone and counter-drone systems before potentially expanding to additional capabilities and countries.

The platform will for now only allow allies to buy U.S. capabilities. 

US DRAINS CRITICAL MISSILE STOCKPILES IN IRAN WAR AS YEARSLONG REBUILD LOOMS

Advertisement

The Army also is launching a rapid competition to develop low-cost interceptors designed to counter drones and cruise missiles without exhausting multimillion-dollar Patriot missile stocks.

Ingraham said companies will have roughly 120 days after an upcoming industry event to demonstrate technologies ranging from rocket motors and seekers to fully integrated interceptor concepts.

«Even if you don’t have it all on the ground … bring it,» he said.

Advertisement

The transformation effort reflects growing concern inside the Pentagon that cheap drones, autonomous systems and mass-produced weapons are rapidly changing the economics and survivability assumptions of modern warfare, particularly after conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East exposed vulnerabilities in traditional armored and aviation-heavy battlefield concepts.

Army Apache

Army leaders signaled that drone-heavy warfare and recent conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East are reshaping the service’s aviation and missile defense strategy, driving new scrutiny of helicopter programs and costly Patriot interceptor systems. (Anthony Bailey/Handout via Reuters)

Army leaders increasingly suggest future wars will rely less on small numbers of expensive manned platforms and more on large quantities of cheaper, networked and rapidly replaceable systems capable of surviving in drone-saturated battlefields.

Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll said at the roundtable that the service is attempting to overhaul what leaders view as decades of broken acquisition practices that left the Army too slow to adapt to rapidly changing battlefield conditions.

Advertisement

«How do we dig down deep into the system to change the broken processes that have led to so many bad outcomes over the last 30 years?» Driscoll said.

Driscoll said the Army had lost Congress’s trust after decades of acquisition failures and budget overruns.

«The United States Army had in some ways lost Congress’s trust over the last 30 years that we could do big new projects, keep them on time, keep them on budget,» he said.

Advertisement

He later referenced the Army’s now-canceled M10 Booker armored vehicle program as an example of the type of procurement failure leaders are trying to avoid.

«When we go to Congress and say, ‘Hey, trust us to develop a new platform. This one will not turn out like the Booker tank,’» Driscoll said.

Driscoll argued the Army already is trying to field new capabilities on dramatically accelerated timelines more similar to wartime adaptation cycles seen in Ukraine than traditional Pentagon acquisition schedules.

Advertisement

«When Operation Epic Fury kicked off, we were able to on day five go start the process to purchase 13,000 Merops counter-drone interceptors,» Driscoll said.

«By day 10, we had contracted for something we had never purchased before,» he added. «They were starting to flow into theater in the thousands by day 20.»

Army officials also said the service is trying to rapidly improve how weapons systems, sensors and battlefield networks communicate with one another after studying Ukraine’s ability to quickly integrate commercial and military technologies during the war.

Advertisement

«The Ukrainians were highlighting to us how their open architecture system allowed information to pass between nearly all of their sensors and radars,» Driscoll said. «That empowered so many things that they could do that we just can’t do yet.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«At this exact moment at Fort Carson, there are 450 developers and programmers jailbreaking all of our equipment,» he added.

Advertisement

«I’m cautiously optimistic within a month from now we will have jailbroken literally hundreds of pieces of equipment.»

conflicts defense, pentagon, drones, us army, spending

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Turs, el primer agente turístico digital impulsado por Inteligencia Artificial en El Salvador

Published

on


Presentan Turs, una plataforma digital para centralizar la información turística del país.(Cortesía: Secretaría de Prensa)

La industria turística de El Salvador incorpora una nueva herramienta digital con el lanzamiento de Turs, el primer super agente turístico impulsado por Inteligencia Artificial en el país.

La plataforma, presentada oficialmente el miércoles, busca transformar la forma en que los viajeros descubren y experimentan los destinos nacionales a través de la integración de tecnología avanzada y ofertas personalizadas.

Advertisement

Turs ofrece un sistema que conecta a turistas con una amplia variedad de opciones, desde rutas y atractivos hasta experiencias culturales y gastronómicas. El proyecto pone un énfasis especial en la interacción directa entre visitantes y anfitriones locales, con el propósito de destacar las historias y el valor humano detrás de cada recorrido.

El objetivo central, según los responsables de la plataforma, consiste en “mostrarle al mundo lo mejor de nuestro país” y fortalecer la reputación de El Salvador como destino turístico.

El lanzamiento de Turs representa un avance relevante para el sector turismo en un contexto de creciente digitalización global.

Advertisement
La plataforma integra inteligencia artificial y tecnología para conectar viajeros con destinos y experiencias locales. (Cortesía: Turs Latinoamérica)
La plataforma integra inteligencia artificial y tecnología para conectar viajeros con destinos y experiencias locales. (Cortesía: Turs Latinoamérica)

La plataforma se describe como una oportunidad para que millones de viajeros accedan a información actualizada, asesoría personalizada y una visión auténtica de la cultura salvadoreña. Los creadores del proyecto subrayan que cada experiencia promovida por el sistema lleva el sello de quienes hacen posible la hospitalidad local.

El sitio oficial de la plataforma, www.turslatam.com, ya se encuentra disponible para usuarios interesados en planificar su próxima visita a El Salvador.

Con esta iniciativa, el país busca posicionarse en el mapa internacional de innovación turística y responder a las nuevas tendencias de viaje que privilegian el acceso digital y las experiencias personalizadas.

El evento contó con la presencia de altos funcionarios y representantes del sector turístico, quienes destacaron el avance en políticas de seguridad y la apuesta por la innovación tecnológica para fomentar el turismo nacional e internacional.

Advertisement

La ministra de Turismo, Morena Valdez, y la viceministra de Relaciones Exteriores, Adriana Mira, participaron activamente en la presentación de la plataforma. Ambas funcionarias destacaron la importancia de la colaboración interinstitucional para fortalecer el sector y destacaron el respaldo del gobierno a la transformación digital como motor de desarrollo económico. “Esta nueva plataforma, Turs, está dando un valor agregado, que es que te ofrece una experiencia con los operadores turísticos locales en cada reservación”, expresó Valdez, citada por la Presidencia a través de su Secretaría

Turs, Turismo de El Salvador, Morena Valdez
La viceministra, Adriana Mira, y la ministra de Turismo, Morena Valdez, y la resaltaron la colaboración interinstitucional y el apoyo gubernamental a la transformación digital en turismo. (Cortesía: Secretaría de Prensa)

Por su parte, durante el evento, Raymond Villalta, fundador y presidente de Turs, resaltó el impacto positivo de las políticas de seguridad implementadas por el gobierno en la percepción internacional del país.

“El Salvador ahora lo podemos recorrer libremente, gracias a Dios, con seguridad, hacia todos lados. Gracias por todo ese apoyo, pero pasa algo; yo creo que le pasa mucho más al extranjero, que no conocemos todas las experiencias que se pueden vivir en El Salvador; conocemos las pupusas, la playa El Tunco, El Zonte y otros lugares preciosos; el lago de Coatepeque, lago de Ilopango y cada vez más cosas que hacer en el país”, afirmó Villalta, de acuerdo con la comunicación oficial de la Secretaría de Prensa de la Presidencia.

La iniciativa busca impulsar la innovación en el sector turístico nacional. (Cortesía: Trust)
La iniciativa busca impulsar la innovación en el sector turístico nacional. (Cortesía: Trust)

En el marco del acto, Villalta entregó un reconocimiento a la ministra de Turismo, Morena Valdez, por el reciente nombramiento de El Salvador como sede del Día Mundial del Turismo 2026.

Este logro fue celebrado como un hito sin precedentes para el país, ya que por primera vez será anfitrión de este evento internacional.

Advertisement

“Vamos a ser sede del Día Mundial del Turismo 2026 por primera vez en la historia de El Salvador; la verdad, me alegra ver a muchísimos actores del sector turístico de todas partes del territorio nacional”, señaló Valdez.



El Salvador,Turs,Turismo de El Salvador,Morena Valdez

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

The hidden left-wing network powering a ‘conservative’ rebellion against a major Trump priority

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A group billing itself as a grassroots conservative movement against new data centers carried out a series of nationwide protests enlisting the help of Green Party figures and Democratic-aligned activists, a Fox News Digital review found.

Advertisement

Though initially launched as a bipartisan project, Humans First has since become — in its own words — a «conservative social movement that is dedicated to ensuring that the future of AI is in the hands of everyday people.» Humans First’s nascent movement was supposed to build up to mass protests on July 18, when the organization says it sought to rally conservatives against the construction of new data centers.

The push put Humans First in tension with one of President Donald Trump’s major economic priorities — accelerating the data-center buildout needed to power America’s AI race.

TOP ENERGY GROUP WARNS WEALTHY FOREIGNERS ARE POTENTIALLY BANKROLLING ANTI-DATA CENTER CAMPAIGNS ACROSS US

Advertisement

Nevada Big Blind center. (Zanskar)

While right-wing activist Amy Kremer is the public face of Humans First, the group’s paper trail shows that the organization didn’t start with her or even another conservative. Incorporation records reviewed by Fox News Digital list staffers from the Center for AI Safety, a San Francisco-based nonprofit, as Humans First’s initial employees. The Center for AI Safety also provided a loan to Humans First to serve as start-up capital, NBC News previously reported.

In a similar vein, several of the local organizers named on Humans First’s website as planning the July 18 protests had backgrounds in left-of-center politics.

Advertisement

«I was one of the earliest leaders of the Tea Party movement in 2009, and I can tell you that the disconnect between the elites and the base that gave rise to the Tea Party movement can be seen today in the battle over AI data centers,» Kremer, chair of Humans First, told Axios in June.

During the Obama administration, Kremer was a top Tea Party activist and, more recently, she was one of the organizers of the «Save America» rally that preceded the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol — a role that later became a focal point during her unsuccessful 2022 run for a Georgia congressional seat.

Her group says the July 18 protests were meant to «give grassroots Americans, particularly grassroots conservatives, a voice in the critical debate over policies relating to the building of massive AI data centers.»

Advertisement

Despite Kremer’s GOP bona fides and her stated goal of mobilizing conservatives, Fox News Digital found that several listed protest organizers had left-wing, Green Party or Democratic-aligned backgrounds, including a transgender Green Party House candidate, local progressive activists and a Democratic state legislative candidate.

FIRST ON FOX: POWERFUL HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS CHAIR THROWS HAMMER DOWN ON ‘FOREIGN-ALIGNED INFLUENCE NETWORK’

AI data center

The program offers paid training, travel support, lodging and a job offer for qualified graduates entering AI infrastructure work. (Meta)

At the bottom of the Humans First webpage advertising the protests, the organization stated that the events it is promoting have not «necessarily» been «fully vetted or endorsed by Humans First.»

Advertisement

Humans First’s website listed a chapter of the Illinois Green Party as organizers for a protest just outside Chicago.

Among other causes, the Illinois Green Party supports solidarity with Cuba, divesting from Israel, expanding abortion access, decriminalizing prostitution, restricting gun laws and impeaching Trump.

Also affiliated with the Illinois Green Party is Alexandria Keating-Sofiakis, a transgender activist and congressional candidate who organized a separate Humans First protest about 50 miles north-west of Chicago. 

Advertisement

Kremer has repeatedly posted critical social media messages about transgender issues, Fox News Digital found.

Keating-Sofiakis’s campaign website lists support for the Green New Deal, expanded abortion rights, ending American support for Israel and Medicare-for-all. Though the two disagree on much, Keating-Sofiakis told Fox News Digital that opposition to data centers transcends traditional ideological boundaries and made working with Kremer feasible.

«Data centers are a cross-partisan problem,» Keating-Sofiakis said. «From a conservative worldview, the drop in property values, increase in water costs, as well as increase in electrical costs that are affiliated with data centers are all antithetical to conservative values. Likewise, from a progressive worldview, the ecological damage alone associated with data centers is more than enough justification to oppose them.»

Advertisement

Keating-Sofiakis also pointed out that local Green Party activists received support from prominent conservatives such as Tomi Lahren and Lara Trump in a recent effort to free dogs from a medical facility.

«I am no longer hesitant to work with conservative figures and organizations on issues we share in common,» Keating-Sofiakis told Fox News Digital.

600 GROUPS WITH $2B IN REVENUE MOBILIZE 3,000 MAY DAY PROTESTS IN A ‘RED-BLUE’ ALLIANCE, PROBE FINDS

Advertisement

Humans First defended its conservative credentials when reached by Fox News Digital.

«First off, we are happy to put our grassroots conservative and America First credentials up against anyone. I was one of the founders of the Tea Party movement back in 2009, and I was one of the earliest and most high profile Trump supporters back in 2015,» Kremer told Fox News Digital. «The men and women on our team are long-time conservative activists who have dedicated their lives to electing conservatives and fighting for conservative policies.»

Most of the official staff listed on Humans First’s website have spent a significant portion of their careers working in conservative politics.

Advertisement

«This line of attack is preposterous but not surprising. This is exactly the same line of attack we saw during the early days of the Tea Party. The establishment and their handmaidens in the media were willing to smear Tea Party activists as racists and bigots in their effort to defend the big interests of their corporate masters,» Kremer continued. «Instead of questioning our conservative credentials, how about asking how any so-called conservative can take money from the same big tech and big AI billionaires who have worked tirelessly to destroy the conservative movement over the last ten years.»

Fox News Digital obtained footage of five Humans First protests across California, Georgia, Missouri and South Carolina. Multiple demonstrators at the event in Gilroy, California, had signs protesting Immigration and Customs Enforcement — a common antagonist for those on the left. Some of the protests were sparsely attended.

Nearly 1,000 miles south of its Green Party-linked protests in Illinois, Humans First’s protest page listed a Georgia activist group called People for Progress as the organizer of a local demonstration. The group was founded after the 2024 election to resist Trump’s agenda and protect «diversity, equity & justice.»

Advertisement

In Missouri, Humans First’s protest page listed the founder of CleanEarth4Kids as an organizer for a Springfield protest. CleanEarth4Kids has publicly urged followers to oppose several Republican-backed measures and support Democratic-backed bills. Ferguson Advocates for Civic Transparency (FACT), another group run by left-of-center individuals, organized an additional Humans First demonstration just outside of St. Louis.

MARXIST ORGANIZER LEADS CAMPAIGN AGAINST VIRGINIA AI DATA CENTER AS FOREIGN INFLUENCE CONCERNS MOUNT

A press release obtained by Fox News Digital shows that the featured speakers at the event included a former Democratic state lawmaker, a current Democratic candidate for the state legislature and a member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation.

Advertisement

Lady Huston, one of the organizers leading FACT, told Fox News Digital that Humans First hosted weekly Zoom meetings for its organizers and sent out regular mass emails with directions and suggestions for them. She, like the other left-of-center organizers working with Humans First, also stressed the opposition to data centers should be a nonpartisan issue.

«[Sen. Josh Hawley] is making statements and saying we need to do something about [data centers]. So, I never thought I’d care about anything this man had to say. But he is in tune with what’s happening with AI … and that we need some better understanding about the effects of data centers,» Huston told Fox News Digital. «So, I’m with him on that. You know, so it doesn’t matter to me what political party you are, but the subject is what matters.»

Back north in Michigan, Humans First listed Mitchell Distin, a Democrat running for state House, as an organizer for a protest, but has since removed that demonstration from its webpage. Fox News Digital reviewed a prior version of the page listing Distin before the demonstration was removed.

Advertisement

«While you are correct in your assessment that I am, by no means, conservative, the data center issue isn’t a left-right issue,» Distin told Fox News Digital. «It’s an issue without precedent, as it transcends party boundaries. And for that reason alone, I believe it’s showing that every day, common Americans actually have far more in common than they realize. We actually agree on the futures we want, not the futures that Big Tech execs want for us.»

TOP ENERGY GROUP WARNS WEALTHY FOREIGNERS ARE POTENTIALLY BANKROLLING ANTI-DATA CENTER CAMPAIGNS ACROSS US

Virginia-Data-Center

On what was recently farmland, Amazon data centers have been built as close as 50 feet from residential houses in the Loudoun Meadows neighborhood on January 20, 2023, in Aldie, VA. A Microsoft data center is under construction in at top right. As the data center industry expands its footprint in Northern Virginia, often building massive commercial structures near residential neighborhoods, communities push back with their concerns. (Photo by Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Not all the organizers who have signed up to facilitate Humans First’s nationwide protests are political liberals.

Advertisement

Cathy Latham, for example, is a longtime Georgia GOP official who is now working as a staffer with Humans First. She organized a July 18 protest in Waco, Texas. Latham was among the 18 defendants, including Trump, indicted in Georgia’s 2020 election-interference case.

Humans First claimed after July 18 that it had helped organize 142 protests across 42 states.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Kremer, speaking to the Washington Examiner in May, expressed disgust with how AI companies have spent millions on lobbying and messaging campaigns to influence policy.

«I’m not for sale,» she told the Washington Examiner. «When I do something, I pour my whole heart and soul into it.»

big tech backlash, politics, artificial intelligence, technology, democratic party

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Incluso bajo el populismo, el fracaso de las élites sigue siendo un problema

Published

on


Cuando Paul Ehrlich, conocido alarmista sobre la superpoblación, falleció el invierno pasado, su muerte inspiró al polemista online Richard Hanania a releer algunos de sus escritos originales sobre la «bomba demográfica».

Hanania descubrió que Ehrlich era, en realidad, peor de lo que sugerían las citas y fragmentos que sus críticos solían citar.

Advertisement

Era profundamente hostil al progreso humano, misántropo en todo sentido, siempre dispuesto a proponer planes que empobrecerían tanto a países ricos como pobres, y comprometido con todo un sistema de pensamiento en el que la vida humana era constantemente denigrada y devaluada.

Aún más sombría era la posición de Ehrlich en el panorama intelectual y cultural.

«No era un tipo encerrado en su habitación escribiendo diatribas», escribió Hanania.

Advertisement

«Era profesor en Stanford, un científico condecorado y uno de los intelectuales públicos más destacados de su generación».

Este análisis es correcto y, de hecho, podría ampliarse:

Ehrlich no solo fue una figura prominente; sus ideas también fueron profundamente influyentes, dando forma a políticas de control de la población que, a corto plazo, produjeron horribles violaciones de los derechos humanos en países como India y China, y a largo plazo empujaron a Asia Oriental por un camino hacia un declive demográfico potencialmente catastrófico.

Advertisement

Pero me interesó especialmente la crítica como contrapunto al reciente proyecto intelectual de Hanania, que ha culminado en su nuevo libro, «Kakistocracia: Por qué el populismo termina en desastre», una crítica al gobierno trumpista y una defensa de la sabiduría y la capacidad de la élite.

Si bien no faltan los argumentos en contra del populismo, el caso de Hanania destaca por provenir de una fuente muy improbable:

un destacado crítico de la ideología woke y de las iniciativas de diversidad, equidad e inclusión, con un pasado como nacionalista blanco anónimo.

Advertisement

Hanania se volvió contra el trumpismo justo cuando parecía estar a punto de convertirse en una de sus voces más influyentes, pero sin dejar de ser demasiado derechista y deliberadamente provocador como para reinventarse como un liberal respetable.

(Recomiendo el perfil de Hanania escrito por Gilad Edelman en The Atlantic para conocer más sobre su evolución).

Esa singular trayectoria da lugar a un antipopulismo que puede ser más perspicaz que las versiones que ofrecen el centroizquierda y la izquierda.

Advertisement

Como adversario del socialismo, Hanania tiene una visión más clara que algunos izquierdistas sobre hasta qué punto las formas de populismo de derecha e izquierda pueden converger en su mala gestión gubernamental.

Como crítico del liberalismo, tiene una perspectiva más matizada sobre la relación entre populismo, democracia y autoritarismo que los centristas anti-Trump, quienes conciben una disyuntiva tajante entre la política tradicional y el fascismo.

La historia que Hanania quiere contar sobre la segunda administración de Donald Trump también tiene mucho mérito, ya que la facción de élite que él esperaba que tuviera la máxima influencia —la «derecha tecnológica«, un término que acuñó para describir a las élites de Silicon Valley que se inclinaron hacia la derecha en respuesta al movimiento woke— fue capturada o abrumada por tendencias populistas hacia la corrupción, el amiguismo y las teorías conspirativas.

Advertisement

La falla

Pero al argumentar contra el populismo, el libro de Hanania no ofrece una explicación suficientemente clara de cómo y por qué falla la gobernanza de las élites.

Tras haberse alejado del antielitismo de derecha, sostiene que las élites —académicas, jurídicas, periodísticas y científicas— están mucho más comprometidas con la búsqueda de la verdad que las masas menos educadas, están más orientadas a la búsqueda de significado y son menos egoístas, mucho menos propensas al tipo de pensamiento conspirativo y mágico que suele proliferar en los círculos populistas.

Advertisement

Cuando las instituciones de élite funcionan bien, esto puede ser cierto.

Pero cuando fracasan, no es solo porque no estén a la altura de estas aspiraciones.

Las aspiraciones mismas, la búsqueda de la verdad y el significado, también generan una serie de tentaciones propias de la élite:

Advertisement

un impulso a priorizar los sistemas intelectuales y las teorías ideológicas sobre la experiencia cotidiana, a usar la inteligencia y la retórica como escudo contra la realidad, a confundir las credenciales de búsqueda de la verdad con la verdad misma.

Consideremos, a modo de ejemplo, la diferencia entre Ehrlich y Joe Rogan.

Hanania critica duramente a Rogan, tratándolo como la encarnación del antiintelectualismo populista, y enumera con desdén todas las ideas que han recibido una atención respetuosa en su programa —desde ciudades antiguas bajo las pirámides hasta teorías antivacunas, pasando por el negacionismo del 11-S y los fenómenos psíquicos— que «son rechazadas prácticamente por todos los académicos y expertos en los campos pertinentes».

Advertisement

Pero también es justo decir que Rogan y gran parte de su audiencia parecen mantener este conjunto de ideas extravagantes y paranoicas mezcladas sin orden aparente, considerándolas teorías y posibilidades, sin construir un sistema riguroso o entusiasta en torno a sus preceptos.

En cambio, Ehrlich tomó una sola idea —mucho más respetable, la de que el rápido crecimiento demográfico podría provocar hambruna o conflictos civiles— y la convirtió en la base de una teoría fanática que justificaba el comportamiento tiránico del gobierno bajo el pretexto de una supuesta emergencia.

Y como lo hizo utilizando el lenguaje de la búsqueda de la verdad académica y la erudición técnica, logró persuadir a individuos, instituciones y gobiernos para que confundieran su misantropía con la ciencia, la razón y el progreso, a lo que solo un populista ignorante o un fanático religioso podrían oponerse.

Advertisement

Patrón

Ese patrón de mala gestión por parte de las élites es sumamente común.

Definió la política de izquierda durante la era de la COVID-19, cuando las malas ideas emanaban del mundo académico y se difundían a través de otras instituciones acreditadas, encontrando su única resistencia real en los sectores menos educados y menos elitistas de la coalición demócrata.

Advertisement

Y, lo que es crucial, aún opera en la coalición de derecha y en la segunda administración Trump, a pesar del aparente predominio del populismo.

Por ejemplo, las dificultades del Departamento de Eficiencia Gubernamental reflejan en parte la renuencia populista a escuchar a expertos acreditados sobre la enorme dificultad de recortar el presupuesto.

Pero la creencia de que un grupo de personas ajenas al sistema con un alto coeficiente intelectual puede llegar y reformar un sistema complejo es, en sí misma, una tentación característica de la élite, una versión de derecha de la fe progresista en los expertos de la torre de marfil.

Advertisement

Es demasiado simplista decir que Elon Musk tuvo problemas en Washington porque abrazó la paranoia populista; también tuvo problemas porque pensó que sus propias formas de búsqueda de la verdad, tan exitosas en los negocios, eran suficientes para lidiar con un mundo muy diferente.

Consideremos, por ejemplo, las dificultades actuales de la administración Trump para salir del estancamiento del conflicto en Irán.

¿Era la guerra el gran anhelo de la audiencia de Rogan, obra de un ecosistema mediático populista, confuso y sin fundamento, o el resultado de haber confiado demasiados puestos en la administración a personas ineptas?

Advertisement

Entre las voces de la coalición de Trump que apoyaban la guerra se encontraban miembros de la élite republicana anterior a Trump y analistas de grupos de expertos que llevaban años defendiendo la intervención.

Las voces que se oponían a menudo pertenecían al ala populista, incluyendo algunas de sus facciones más paranoicas.

Y si bien Trump pronto cambió de opinión sobre el conflicto, una de las voces inicialmente favorables a la guerra fue Hanania, cegado por un optimismo pasajero sobre la capacidad del ejército estadounidense para transformar el mundo.

Advertisement

La conclusión de esta experiencia no es que el gobierno populista sea deseable; claramente fracasa en muchos de los aspectos que describe Hanania.

Pero reconocer esos fracasos no debería hacernos ingenuos ante el fracaso de las élites, que persiste incluso en condiciones populistas y conserva su particular poder para disfrazar la arrogancia de sabiduría y tentar a personas inteligentes a cometer insensateces.

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias