El presidente estadounidense, Donald Trump, recibió el martes al primer ministro israelí, Benjamin Netanyahu, en una reunión calificada de «positiva» por ambas partes, que les permitió reafirmar su rechazo a que Irán se dote de armas nucleares.

Fue el primer encuentro entre ambos desde los ataques conjuntos de Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán el 28 de febrero, que desató la guerra en Oriente Medio, y tras desacuerdos públicos sobre el conflicto.

En un video difundido por el propio Netanyahu, el primer ministro israelí aseguró haber tenido «una de las mejores conversaciones que he tenido con el presidente de Estados Unidos» y que ambos se ratificaron en su objetivo común: «asegurarse de que Irán no obtiene armas nucleares».

«Fue una reunión extremadamente positiva», había dicho antes una fuente cercana a Netanyahu. La reunión fue «positiva y productiva», detalló por su parte la Casa Blanca.

Fue el octavo encuentro entre ambos mandatarios desde que Trump regresó a la Casa Blanca, en enero de 2025.

Sin embargo, la cita a puerta cerrada, que duró alrededor de hora y media y tras la cual los participantes no tuvieron ningún intercambio con la prensa, no disipa la impresión de discrepancias entre ellos.

Sus relaciones tocaron fondo en abril durante las negociaciones de un alto al fuego con Teherán, cuando Trump cargó con insultos contra Netanyahu y lo describió como un «tipo muy difícil».

Netanyahu se esforzó en las últimas semanas en restar importancia a esas diferencias calificándolas de «desacuerdos tácticos».

La visita de Netanyahu tiene lugar en un «momento crítico para Oriente Medio», mientras Irán sigue «priorizando el terrorismo antes que las negociaciones» y bloqueando el estrecho de Ormuz, vía marítima estratégica, declaró más temprano el martes Danny Danon, embajador de Israel ante las Naciones Unidas.

Washington afirma ahora querer dar una nueva oportunidad a la diplomacia tras dos semanas de bombardeos sin precedentes desde la tregua de abril. Israel no participó en esta última ronda de ataques.

Según Yonatan Freeman, experto en relaciones internacionales en la Universidad Hebrea de Jerusalén, el objetivo de ambos era disipar las especulaciones sobre un enfriamiento de las relaciones.

Trump afronta unas difíciles elecciones legislativas el 3 de noviembre, y Netanyahu elecciones generales el 27 de octubre.

«La principal cuestión es mostrar al mundo entero, a Irán, pero también al Líbano y a otros países en particular, que no hay ruptura ni desacuerdo mayor entre Estados Unidos e Israel», declaró este experto a la AFP.

Los últimos sondeos sitúan a Netanyahu en dificultades, ya que una parte de la opinión pública le reprocha el fracaso de su gobierno en impedir el ataque de Hamás del 7 de octubre de 2023, que desencadenó la guerra en Gaza.

Trump separa oficialmente la ofensiva contra Irán de la situación en Líbano, donde Israel mantiene su propio pulso con Hezbollah, el movimiento aliado de Teherán.

Washington quiere sin embargo pacificar toda la región, donde las dificultades para transportar crudo y gas están impactando en la inflación en Estados Unidos.

Al ser interrogado el martes sobre informaciones según las cuales Irán está fortificando la montaña Kolang, donde podría tener importantes instalaciones nucleares, Trump respondió: «No necesito que Bibi (el apodo de Netanyahu) me diga eso. Bibi me dice eso porque quiere que siga implicado».

«Sé exactamente lo que está pasando en Kolang, no es un gran problema. Si no llegamos a un acuerdo, la destruiremos muy fácilmente», dijo en el canal Fox News antes del encuentro.

Otro de los puntos importantes entre ambos países es la situación en la Franja de Gaza. Varios medios israelíes, citando fuentes políticas, han informado de que el gabinete de seguridad había aprobado el marco jurídico que permite el despliegue de una fuerza internacional de estabilización (ISF) en Gaza, una decisión presentada como un gesto hacia Washington.

Esta fuerza internacional, que se inscribe en el marco del «Consejo de Paz» impulsado por Donald Trump, constituye uno de los componentes del dispositivo estadounidense previsto para la posguerra en Gaza, devastada tras dos años de guerra.

More than 1,000 inmates death-row inmates held in a unit of Iran’s Ghezel Hesar Prison have entered a third week of a mass hunger strike to protest regime executions, with some prisoners sewing their lips shut in protest, according to reports.

The escalating demonstration at the U.S.-sanctioned Ghezel Hesar Prison in Karaj near Tehran, also highlights growing international concern over the Islamic Republic’s reliance on capital punishment, particularly for drug-related offenses.

According to the Human Rights Activists News Agency  (HRANA), the hunger strike started on July 13, after six inmates were transferred to solitary confinement ahead of possible executions. Other Iranian human rights groups said the prisoners had been convicted of drug-related offenses.

WHO IS AHMAD VAHIDI? IRAN’S NEW IRGC CHIEF TIED TO GLOBAL ATTACKS AND ‘DEATH TO AMERICA’ IDEOLOGY

Reports also indicate that the striking prisoners have been chanting «No to Execution» and taking extreme measures, including sewing their lips shut.

One media outlet cited a video that appeared to show an inmate speaking to the camera and saying he was going to sew his lips shut because, six days into the hunger strike, no prison official had responded to the protest.

The Guardian reported that the video also appears to show an unseen prisoner using a needle and thread to stitch the man’s lips shut.

In a statement released on July 27, the exiled Iranian opposition group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), reported that prisoners in Unit 2 of Ghezel Hesar Prison were in «deteriorating physical condition» because of the hunger strike.

«Although 15 days have passed since the start of this hunger strike, the henchmen of the regime’s judiciary have given no response to the striking prisoners. Despite the prisoners’ deteriorating physical condition and urgent need for medical attention, prison guards have taken no measures to care for them,» the organization said.

FREED AMERICAN REVEALS BRUTAL IRAN PRISON ORDEAL, WARNS HOSTAGES FACE GREATER DANGER

The NCRI also said the striking prisoners urged the public, human rights organizations and international bodies to take action to halt the executions.

This marks the second major demonstration at the facility in recent months.

A similar protest occurred at Ghezel Hesar Prison in October 2025, when more than 1,500 inmates staged a six-day hunger strike, according to reports.

That demonstration ended after senior judicial and prison officials made a visit to the facility and promised to temporarily halt executions and review cases.

However, human rights activists report those promises were never fulfilled, according to Ynet.

COULD NARGES MOHAMMADI UNITE IRAN’S OPPOSITION? HUSBAND SAYS IMPRISONED NOBEL LAUREATE STILL FIGHTING

Antony Blinken, United States Secretary of State, speaks during a meeting of the United Nations Security Council, Thursday, Sept. 23, 2021, during the 76th Session of the U.N. General Assembly in New York. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, Pool)

The State Department had designated and sanctioned Ghezel Hesar Prison in 2024 for gross human rights violations and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of prisoners.

«These heinous acts included multiple severe beatings of political prisoners engaged in a peaceful hunger strike to protest the increased wave of executions being carried out at the facility,» then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken said at the time.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

According to Amnesty International, the Islamic Republic of Iran executed at least 2,159 people in 2025.

Iran’s total helped drive the number of executions recorded by Amnesty International to at least 2,707 across 17 countries — the highest figure the organization has recorded since 1981. The total excludes China, where execution data is classified as a state secret and Amnesty believes thousands of executions were carried out.

A new law in Maine will limit state and local law enforcement agencies’ cooperation with federal immigration officials.

The law is set to take effect on Wednesday, along with other measures that seek to restrict the state’s cooperation with civil immigration enforcement.

The «ICE Out of Policing» law restricts state and local law enforcement agencies, including jails, from assisting federal authorities with civil immigration enforcement.

Law enforcement agencies will be prohibited from reaching out to Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol agents for translation services if they encounter a person who does not speak English, and they generally may not provide personal information for civil immigration enforcement, although the law includes exceptions for criminal investigations and certain legally permitted information exchanges.

TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGE TORPEDOES DOJ LAWSUIT AGAINST MINNESOTA’S SANCTUARY IMMIGRATION RULES

The law also restricts local and state agencies from holding people for ICE based solely on civil immigration enforcement, and jails generally will be prohibited from notifying ICE about nonpublic inmate release dates or honoring civil detainer requests, subject to exceptions involving serious crimes, outstanding warrants, final removal orders and certain public-safety concerns.

Another law also taking effect on Wednesday generally prohibits employees at public schools, state colleges, public libraries, healthcare facilities and child-care facilities from voluntarily allowing immigration officers into nonpublic areas or granting access to protected records without a judicial warrant or other applicable legal authority.

A third law restricts landlords from disclosing tenants’ personal information without consent, including information related to immigration status, while preserving exceptions for warrants, subpoenas, emergencies and certain legitimate housing or legal purposes.

The policing measure became law without Mills’ signature in January. Mills signed the schools, libraries and healthcare measure in April, while the tenant-privacy measure became law without her signature later that month.

The laws are set to take effect on Wednesday. ((AP Photo/Ryan Murphy, File)

Several Maine cities, including Portland, Lewiston, Waterville and Rockland, have already adopted their own laws restricting local police from communicating with ICE and Border Patrol.

Local governments across the country have also sought to pass similar legislation.

The Maine State Police announced in December that it would begin following the policing restrictions before the law took effect. Some agencies continued contacting immigration officials, while Scott Stewart, president of the Maine Chiefs of Police Association, warned that limiting cooperation could expose Maine agencies to federal funding cuts or increased enforcement.

Immigrant rights advocates said the new laws will improve community trust in Maine officials to ensure public safety, regardless of immigration status.

GOP SENATORS RALLY AROUND NEW DHS PROPOSAL TARGETING SANCTUARY CITIES: ‘SHOULD PAY A PRICE’

The policing measure became law without Mills’ signature in January. Mills signed the schools, libraries and healthcare measure in April, while the tenant-privacy measure became law without her signature later that month. (Sofia Aldinio/Bloomberg)

The ACLU of Maine, Immigrant Legal Advocacy Project, Maine Immigrants’ Rights Coalition and civil legal aid provider Maine Equal Justice held a news conference on Tuesday about the new laws targeting ICE operations, according to the Portland Press Herald.

Sue Roche, executive director for the Immigrant Legal Advocacy Project, said she was aware of more than 50 incidents last year where state and local police contacted immigration officials, leading to arrests.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«The vast majority of people who have been handed over to ICE or Border Patrol by Maine’s law enforcement were people in lawful immigration processes who had no criminal record,» Roche said.

Fox News Digital has reached out to ICE for comment.