Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Church cans patriotic staple on Biden’s posh vacation enclave — pastor says tradition ‘doesn’t cut it’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Nantucket pastor is defending her church’s decision to cancel its annual Fourth of July reading of America’s founding documents, using her sermon to explain why the long-running tradition was axed on the exclusive Massachusetts island favored by former President Joe Biden.

Advertisement

«After two and a half centuries why are our founding documents still celebrated as mainly aspirational? 250 years later aspirational –– not being there yet –– celebrating the promise of those documents –– and our country –– just doesn’t cut it,» Rev. Erin Splaine of the Second Congregational Meeting House Society said in a sermon excerpt she provided to Fox News Digital.

The historic Nantucket Unitarian Meeting House has hosted a public reading of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights in downtown Nantucket each Fourth of July holiday for the past 25 years before the church decided to cancel it in May as part of an ongoing effort to understand its «own whiteness.»

«What should unify all of us is not to continue to assume –– or hide behind –– aspirational only –– rather to commit to the work of change –– to be brave enough to be uncomfortable –– unsettled –– unaccepting of an incomplete narrative,» the sermon continued.

Advertisement

BIDEN’S POSH VACATION ENCLAVE ROILED AS CHURCH AXES JULY 4 TRADITION OVER ‘WHITENESS’ DEBATE: ‘SPEWING LIES’

A Nantucket pastor defends canceling the church’s annual Fourth of July reading of founding documents, citing a need to understand their «own whiteness.» (iStock)

The decision to cancel the annual reading was announced in a letter published by the Nantucket Current, which discussed ongoing conversations within the congregation about race, privilege and the historical application of constitutional rights.

Advertisement

The cancelation sparked a wave of social media backlash, with critics arguing the decision reflected broader discomfort on the left with traditional celebrations of America’s founding.

The letter stated that Splaine would not «engage» with anyone concerned with the cancelation on social media, saying those concerned could make an «appointment» to speak with her. «Social media is not the place for important, tender conversations,» the letter read.  

Fox News Digital reached out to Splaine for comment last week, after the Nantucket Current published her letter announcing the event was canceled. She responded with an excerpt from her recent sermon defending the decision.

Advertisement

«While a few people have taken up the invitation to connect – the overwhelming majority who disagree have not. It is disappointing because there is so much to talk about and absolutely no worth in yelling at each other,» Splaine told Fox News Digital.

WEALTHY SUMMER SANCTUARY LIMITS TOURISTS, HIRES PATROL ‘DOCENTS’ TO KEEP OUTSIDERS IN CHECK

joe biden with milkshake on nantucket

 Biden and his family head up to the island almost every year to celebrate Thanksgiving with family for decades. (BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

Local leaders and the island’s chamber of commerce had promoted the event in prior years on social media platforms for all to celebrate the holiday.

Advertisement

«There are also those who have said the event should continue because it is important to bring people together. The crucial question is what people? Who is missing? What story is being celebrated? Whose experience is part of that story –– whose experience is not?» preached Splaine in her sermon.

Nantucket, a famed summer retreat off the Massachusetts coast, attracts celebrities, millionaires — and billionaires. Biden and his family head up to the island almost every year to celebrate Thanksgiving with family for decades.

Critics were quick to flood social media with reactions, pointing to the island’s exclusivity and arguing that some on the left appear increasingly uncomfortable celebrating America’s founding ahead of the nation’s 250th birthday.

Advertisement

THE CHURCH IS HOLY GROUND, NOT A STAGE FOR THE LEFT’S POLITICAL RAGE

nantucket harbor beauty shot

To salvage the annual event, another church on the island, St. Paul’s Episcopal Church, announced it would read the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. (Ashley J. DiMella/Fox News Digital)

«Just another organization with leaders having a hidden agenda. I doubt a poll of all members would show a majority wanting the reading cancelled,» commented one person.

«So many churches have been infiltrated by people that don’t believe the word of God in any way shape or form. They’re like a virus that had taken over the host,» commented another person.

Advertisement

«I was hoping we were past this – naive of me,» shared an X user.

«The left can’t have anything that might encourage patriotism,» added one person.

PROTECTING THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IN OUR 250TH YEAR

Advertisement
nantucket beauty shot with boats, joe biden with milkshake on island

A Nantucket pastor used her sermon to explain why the long-running tradition was axed on the exclusive Massachusetts island favored by former President Joe Biden. (Ashley J. DiMella/Fox News Digital: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

To salvage the annual event, another church on the island, St. Paul’s Episcopal Church, announced it would read the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, the Nantucket Current reported.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

 «We may not be there yet but we felt it was important to gather together and try to live up to the promises our country has made,» said St. Paul’s Rev. Max Wolf. «Those documents are aspirational.»

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to the Nantucket Unitarian Meeting House for additional comment, as well as Biden’s office. 

patriotism, bill of rights, constitution, america 250, faith personal freedoms

INTERNACIONAL

Socialist insurgents force moderate Democrats into high-risk showdown over must-hold races

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Democratic Party’s ideological war is moving from deep-blue congressional districts to statewide contests in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota, where progressive victories could reshape the party and endanger must-hold seats in November.

Advertisement

After far-left and socialist candidates defeated more moderate contenders in deep-blue districts last month, upcoming Senate primaries in Michigan and Minnesota and Wisconsin’s gubernatorial primary will test whether the movement can translate those wins into statewide power.

Progressive champion Sen. Bernie Sanders, the independent from Vermont and two-time Democratic presidential primary runner-up, touted on the campaign trail this past weekend, «Within the last year, we have won mayor’s races in New York City. We’ve won mayor’s races in Seattle. Washington, D.C. We have won congressional elections and Democratic primaries in Arizona, Ohio, Pennsylvania, California, Montana, Colorado, New Jersey and New York.»

After victories by far-left and socialist candidates over more moderate contenders in deep-blue congressional districts in New York City and Colorado last month drew outsized national attention, upcoming primaries in Michigan and Wisconsin are now the latest battleground in the high-stakes showdown.

Advertisement

And the center is pushing back.

MEET THE FAR LEFT INSURGENTS WAGING WAR ON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE 2026 MIDTERMS

«Socialism has not worked anywhere on the globe,» former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday in an interview on Fox Business’ «Mornings with Maria.» «Promises of free lunch, free buses, free bread, free everything. There’s no such thing as free. Someone always pays. This is a dream. This is nirvana. This is utopia. And they’re selling to young people who are buying it. It’s not going to work.»

Advertisement

The former governor resigned amid multiple scandals five years ago and failed in his political comeback last year, losing New York City’s mayoral election to socialist Zohran Mamdani,

The victories by a trio of far-left congressional candidates in New York City heavily supported by Mamdani, followed a week later by Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)-backed challenger and first-time candidate Melat Kiros’ defeat of 15-term Democratic Rep. Diana DeGette in Colorado, have emboldened progressives as they wage a far-left national pressure campaign against the Democratic Party.

DEMOCRATIC PARTY CIVIL WAR HITS DEBATE STAGE IN CRUCIAL PRIMARY SHOWDOWN

Advertisement

Congressional candidate Claire Valdez, Congressional candidate Brad Lander, Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and Congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier raise their hands during a Get Out the Vote (GOTV) rally at King’s Theater on June 18, 2026, in New York City. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

«Only socialism can solve decades of capitalist mismanagement in the US. Our newly elected leaders will fight for the working class — not for crumbs,» the DSA proclaimed in a social media post celebrating the string of primary election victories.

That view is far from universal.

Advertisement

«I’m tired of being told that, to be a progressive, I now must swear allegiance to crazy ideas,» Democratic political analyst Van Jones, a veteran of then-President Barack Obama’s administration, lamented in a social media post.

«Supporting Hamas is not progressive. ‘No police, no prisons, no borders’ is not progressive. Celebrating the murder of Israeli civilians is not progressive. These ideas are REGRESSIVE,» Jones wrote.

Jamie Metzl, a technology and healthcare futurist who years ago served in former President Bill Clinton’s administration, said in a Fox News Channel interview that it’s time for Democrats «to stand up» to what he called «the bigots and anti-Americans in our own party.»

Advertisement

Metzl said the DSA and other far-left groups «who are trying to take control of our party and our brand» represent «a fundamental threat to our party and our country.»

VAN JONES WARNS FAR-LEFT AGENDA IS ‘REGRESSIVE’ THREAT TO DEMOCRATIC PARTY

A composite image of Michigan U.S. Sen. candidate, Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Mich., and Michigan U.S. Sen candidate, Abdul El-Sayed

Retiring Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., has abandoned his neutrality in Michigan’s high-stakes Democratic Senate primary, backing U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens, pictured left, as party leaders rally to stop progressive rival Abdul El-Sayed, pictured right, from winning the nomination. (AP Photo/Kristen Norman)

Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, another progressive rockstar, parachuted into Michigan’s campaign trail this past weekend to boost Abdul El-Sayed, the far-left candidate they’re supporting in a crucial Democratic Senate primary.

Advertisement

El-Sayed, a former Wayne County Health Department director who unsuccessfully ran an insurgent campaign for governor in 2018, is facing off for the party’s nomination in the Great Lakes battleground state against Rep. Haley Stevens, a more moderate lawmaker backed by longtime Senate Democratic Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer and the establishment.

https://www.foxnews.com/category/politics/elections/republicans

The winner of the Aug. 4 Democratic primary will take on former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers, who is on a glide path to the GOP nomination, in the key midterm Senate faceoff to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters.

Advertisement

The rare open Senate seat is a top Republican target in the midterms, as well as a must-hold for the Democrats as they aim to win back the Senate majority from the GOP, which currently controls the chamber with a slim 53-47 margin.

El-Sayed, who, if elected, would make history as the nation’s first Muslim senator, has made support for Medicare for all a major component of his campaign.

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

Advertisement

The far-left candidate has also called for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and is a vocal critic of Israel amid its war with Hamas — even characterizing Israel’s actions in Gaza as «genocide» against Palestinians. And El-Sayed, who served as a top surrogate on Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign, has vowed not to accept PAC donations.

Schumer and the party establishment view Stevens as more electable than El-Sayed, who has sparked controversy with his past comments. They worry that El-Sayed as the party’s nominee would jeopardize the Democrat-controlled Senate seat by pushing the party too far to the left in a state that President Donald Trump carried two years ago by just over one percentage point.

The primary clash is combustible and expensive, with outside groups spending big bucks to flood the campaign trail with ads. The biggest spending, to boost Stevens and attack El-Sayed, is United Democracy Project, a political action committee aligned with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Advertisement

SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

abdul-el-sayed-2

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., from left, Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speak during the «The People v. The Powerful» campaign event at the Detroit Opera House in Detroit on July 18, 2026. (Nic Antaya/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«I think we’re at an opportunity to show folks where the Democratic Party ought to go. Whether or not there are people who oppose that, that’s for them to decide. But if you’re opposing that on behalf of big corporations, folks like AIPAC, you’re going to find that their power is going to start to slip,» El-Sayed warned in a Fox News interview on Sunday.

Sanders, speaking alongside El-Sayed and Ocasio-Cortez on Saturday, argued, «In all due respect to Haley Stevens, everyone knows that this is not an election between her and Abdul El-Sayed. This is an election between Abdul and the billionaire class.»

Advertisement

Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, a vocal critic of the far left and a top Democratic supporter of Israel, fired back in a Fox News Channel interview.

«You know, humble yourself, Bernie. You know, you just pushed an accused rapist and imploded up in Maine and now you’re pushing, you know, essentially a pro-Hamas candidate that’s been anti-American and deeply anti-Israel,» Fetterman said as he pointed to Sanders’ support over the past year for now-ex-Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner of Maine.

Platner ended his campaign earlier this month, amid calls from top Democrats in Maine and across the country to immediately exit the race following an explosive report containing an allegation of rape from a woman he previously dated. Platner denied the report but stepped aside.

Advertisement

One week after the showdown in Michigan, on Aug. 11, Wisconsin will hold its primary elections. That’s where DSA-backed state Rep. Francesca Hong is on the rise among a crowded field of candidates in the race to succeed retiring Democratic Gov. Tony Evers.

«It’s a great day to be a democratic socialist,» Hong posted on X last month after the progressive victories in New York City, in which two Democratic congressional incumbents lost renomination. «Wisconsin is next!»

Francesca Hong is gaining momentum in her 2026 bid for Wisconsin governor

Francesca Hong, a Democratic state lawmaker and socialist candidate for Wisconsin governor, speaks to voters at a retirement home, Tuesday, July 7, 2026, in Madison, Wis. (Scott Bauer/AP Photo)

The same day, another statewide battle will take place as progressive Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan of Minnesota and more moderate Democratic Rep. Angie Craig are the leading contenders in the Democratic primary faceoff to succeed retiring Sen. Tina Smith, a fellow Democrat.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

While the upcoming primary battles will impact the fight for the future of the party, there’s a more immediate concern: this year’s midterm faceoff for congressional majorities.

«What you’re seeing here are the two opposing forces of the Democratic Party,» veteran Democratic strategist Joe Caiazzo told Fox News Digital as he referred to the ballot box showdowns. «The stakes are monumentally high because Democrats have to hold these seats in November.»

Advertisement



andrew cuomo, bernie sanders, alexandria ocasio cortez, democratic party, democrats elections, midterm elections, michigan

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Una modesta propuesta para la disputa por el estrecho: un pacto compartido entre los Estados del Golfo

Published

on


Si bien la guerra de Estados Unidos con Irán surgió de tensiones de larga data sobre su programa nuclear, la atención se ha centrado ahora drásticamente en el control iraní del estrecho de Ormuz.

El resultado es un bloqueo que afecta a una quinta parte del suministro mundial de petróleo y una disputa enconada que ha llevado a ambos países de nuevo al conflicto abierto.

Advertisement

A pesar de las reiteradas garantías del presidente Donald Trump de que Irán no posee armada y que el estrecho está abierto al paso, el tráfico marítimo se ha desplomado en medio de los renovados ataques iraníes contra buques mercantes.

La diplomacia prácticamente se ha paralizado y, durante el fin de semana, las fuerzas estadounidenses e iraníes continuaron intercambiando ataques en la región.

Expertos militares consideran que intentar abrir por la fuerza un paso tan estrecho y vulnerable en plena guerra sería una tarea mortal e interminable.

Advertisement

En busca de respuestas, un grupo de analistas ha propuesto un posible modelo de compromiso para el Golfo Pérsico.

Se basa en un tratado algo desconocido, ahora extinto, que en su día reguló la producción colectiva de carbón y acero en Europa tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

La propuesta del grupo, detallada en un informe publicado este mes, es la siguiente: los países ribereños del Golfo lo tratarían como un territorio compartido —una especie de bien común regional— y cobrarían una tarifa simbólica únicamente a los petroleros por el mantenimiento de las aguas.

Advertisement

Esto podría ajustarse al derecho internacional, satisfacer la demanda de Irán de un mayor control y otorgar a los ocho estados ribereños del Golfo un interés en el mantenimiento de la paz, según el grupo.

“Si no podemos imaginar un mundo donde estos países administren una tarifa simbólica para realizar trabajos de seguridad marítima y medioambientales, entonces eso es una especie de indicador de si habrá algún camino hacia una paz regional más duradera”, dijo Esfandyar Batmanghelidj, fundador y director ejecutivo de la Fundación Bourse & Bazaar, un centro de estudios con sede en Londres centrado en el desarrollo y la diplomacia en Oriente Medio y la región en general.

“Hasta que no logremos este tipo de cooperación más básica, no podremos avanzar en los asuntos más importantes”, añadió en una entrevista telefónica.

Advertisement

La idea principal que subyace a la propuesta es que la situación en el Golfo Pérsico es análoga a la de Europa al final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

En medio de la lucha por recuperarse de dos conflictos sangrientos y devastadores, Robert Schuman, ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Francia, rechazó intentar aislar a Alemania como se hizo tras la Primera Guerra Mundial.

En cambio, Francia y Alemania colaboraron en la producción de carbón y acero, dos componentes clave para la fabricación de armamento, en virtud de un acuerdo conocido como la Comunidad Europea del Carbón y del Acero.

Advertisement

Esto hizo que la guerra entre los dos rivales históricos fuera «no solo impensable, sino materialmente imposible», declaró Schuman en 1950.

A Francia y Alemania se unieron Italia, Bélgica, Luxemburgo y los Países Bajos, una coalición que finalmente condujo a la creación de la Unión Europea.

Lograr tal unión en el Golfo implicaría superar múltiples obstáculos, entre ellos las agendas políticas divergentes y las rivalidades históricas.

Advertisement

Aun así, la alternativa actual, intentar abrir el estrecho por la fuerza militar, sería desalentadora.

Planificación

El Pentágono lleva décadas planificando cómo reabrir el estrecho de Ormuz en caso de conflicto, afirmó Mara Karlin, profesora de seguridad nacional en la Universidad Johns Hopkins, quien dirigió la planificación militar estratégica durante la administración Biden como subsecretaria de defensa.

Advertisement

El desminado es un trabajo increíblemente lento y extenuante, y los pocos buques de la Armada estadounidense diseñados para ello quedarían expuestos, dijo, por lo que siempre se dio por sentado un armisticio como condición previa.

«La reapertura se ha centrado casi exclusivamente en un entorno permisivo porque se considera demasiado difícil intentar reabrir y llevar a cabo el minucioso proceso de desminado cuando un solo ataque reinicia toda la misión», afirmó.

Colocar una sola mina nueva, o incluso amenazar con hacerlo, puede disuadir el transporte marítimo.

Advertisement

Otro método sería que Estados Unidos o alguna coalición internacional proporcionara escoltas.

Este procedimiento fue utilizado por la Armada estadounidense para proteger a los petroleros con bandera kuwaití que sufrían ataques iraníes hacia el final de la guerra Irán-Irak en la década de 1980.

Esto provocó frecuentes escaramuzas con las fuerzas iraníes, y un buque de guerra que chocó con una mina estuvo a punto de hundirse.

Advertisement

En los años transcurridos desde entonces, Irán ha desarrollado amenazas mucho más ágiles, que incluyen drones y misiles disparados desde lanzadores móviles o las lanchas rápidas de ataque empleadas por la Guardia Revolucionaria, a veces denominadas su «flota de mosquitos».

“Quizás podamos neutralizar su capacidad para interceptar el transporte marítimo, pero basta con que una lancha rápida, un par de minas o unos cuantos drones logren pasar, y de hecho habrán bloqueado el comercio de nuevo”, dijo Ryan Crocker, ex embajador de Estados Unidos en varios países de la región, incluidos Irak y Kuwait.

Neutralizar los ataques iraníes requeriría un amplio despliegue de fuerzas terrestres para controlar la extensa costa iraní, lo que aumentaría considerablemente el riesgo de bajas estadounidenses.

Advertisement

«Creo que hasta la fecha se ha considerado que podemos reabrir el estrecho, pero no en un plazo ni a un costo que se considerara aceptable», declaró Suzanne Maloney, vicepresidenta y directora de política exterior de la Brookings Institution.

Irán ha insistido en que el artículo 5 del Memorando de Entendimiento que Estados Unidos e Irán firmaron el 17 de junio le otorga plena autoridad para restablecer la navegación normal.

Ha acusado a Estados Unidos de intentar socavar su poder de negociación mediante la apertura de un canal de navegación alternativo que bordea la costa de Omán, en el lado occidental del estrecho de Ormuz.

Advertisement

Cambio

En su informe, Batmanghelidj y su colega Mehran Haghirian, de la Fundación Bourse & Bazaar, señalan que los extensos puertos del Golfo, como Jebel Ali en Dubái (Emiratos Árabes Unidos), ya cobran tasas de servicio a los barcos que utilizan sus instalaciones, por lo que no sería un gran salto otorgar una autoridad similar a un organismo supranacional que repartiera los ingresos.

Según los autores, la medida más lógica sería aplicar dichas tasas a los mayores petroleros que transitan anualmente por el Golfo, incluidos 600 superpetroleros que realizan múltiples viajes.

Advertisement

El valor anual de los envíos de petróleo ronda los 600.000 millones de dólares, según la Agencia Internacional de Energía.

Las navieras apenas notarían un pequeño recargo, y los petroleros representan el mayor riesgo de daño ambiental, señala el informe.

Seis estados árabes del Golfo —Arabia Saudita, Qatar, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Kuwait, Bahréin y Omán, todos aliados de Estados Unidos— ya pertenecen a una organización llamada Consejo de Cooperación del Golfo.

Advertisement

Si bien suele ser eficaz a la hora de establecer directrices colectivas sobre asuntos cotidianos como la industrialización, la organización es conocida por sus constantes divisiones en lo que respecta a la acción política conjunta.

Según Batmanghelidj, la incorporación de Irán e Irak a la ecuación podría hacer que el consejo fuera aún más inestable, una preocupación expresada por algunos funcionarios europeos.

Consideran que Oriente Medio está permanentemente asolado por el conflicto, pero Francia y Alemania tenían la misma reputación después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, señaló.

Advertisement

La pregunta clave es si Estados Unidos e Irán estarían de acuerdo.

La agencia oficial de noticias de la República Islámica publicó el 10 de julio un extenso ensayo en el que expresaba su interés por un acuerdo colectivo, y también reprodujo la propuesta de Bourse & Bazaar.

«El estrecho de Ormuz no es simplemente un paso para el intercambio de bienes y energía, sino una oportunidad para la cooperación regional», señalaba el artículo de IRNA.

Advertisement

«Si se gestiona adecuadamente, sus beneficios económicos y financieros pueden compartirse de forma más equitativa entre los países de la región».

La seguridad nacional iraní «depende de preservar los acuerdos iraníes que rigen el estrecho de Ormuz», declaró el general Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, presidente del Parlamento iraní y principal negociador, en un comunicado el miércoles.

Al mismo tiempo, «debemos utilizar también las herramientas de la diplomacia y la negociación para lograr y concretar nuestros intereses nacionales», añadió.

Advertisement

Es imposible predecir cómo responderá Trump a tal propuesta. Altos funcionarios estadounidenses, incluido el secretario de Estado Marco Rubio, han insistido en que el estrecho de Ormuz vuelva a tener la navegación internacional sin restricciones que existía antes de la guerra.

Esa parecía ser la postura de Trump. Luego sugirió cobrar una tarifa del 20% sobre toda la carga a cambio de que la Armada estadounidense protegiera el estrecho, antes de retirar la propuesta 24 horas después.

Según los analistas, uno de los principales obstáculos actuales es la falta de objetivos políticos bien definidos por parte de Estados Unidos. «Creo que el mayor inconveniente ahora es la incertidumbre sobre la postura de Estados Unidos», afirmó Crocker, el exembajador.

Advertisement

«Los estados del Golfo necesitan sin duda ese tipo de garantías a largo plazo por parte de Estados Unidos antes de estar dispuestos a tomar medidas, ya sean unilaterales o colectivas».

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Johnson’s strategy to bypass Democrats’ SAVE Act blockade survives key vote, handing GOP big win

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Speaker Mike Johnson’s latest bid to skirt Democrats’ opposition to an election integrity bill backed by President Donald Trump survived a key hurdle on Monday evening.

Advertisement

The Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act has faced significant headwinds in Congress despite having Trump’s full-throated support. While it passed the House, the legislation has struggled in the Senate where at least several Democratic votes are needed to break a filibuster and advance to final passage.

But the new plan by Johnson, R-La., which would allow key parts of the bill to skirt Democrats entirely, is one step closer to getting a House-wide vote sometime this week.

TRUMP INTERVENES AS HOUSE GOP REVOLT PUTS SAVE AMERICA ACT AT CENTER OF SPENDING SHOWDOWN

Advertisement

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., attend the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s National Commemoration of the Days of Remembrance ceremony in Emancipation Hall on Tuesday, April 14, 2026. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

Republicans would erase the need for any Democratic buy-in by putting key elements of the SAVE America Act into a larger budget reconciliation bill. The reconciliation process allows the party in power to pass sweeping fiscal policy reforms without input from their opposition by lowering the Senate’s threshold for passage to line up with the House’s simple majority requirement.

But there are strict guidelines for what can be in a reconciliation bill. Such legislation must deal with yearly federal spending and revenues, meaning issues that do not directly affect fiscal policy are generally excluded.

Advertisement

House Republicans are aiming to use this reconciliation bill to fund states’ election integrity efforts, replenish military funding amid the U.S. war with Iran, and dole out aid to American farmers.

GOP’S $95B DEFENSE PACKAGE SURVIVES CRITICAL HURDLE AMID FISCAL HAWK REVOLT

In total, the legislation would set the stage for $95 billion in new federal spending across the next 10 years.

Advertisement

The first chamber-wide step in the reconciliation process is to pass a framework that directs the relevant committees to then craft details dealing with their allocated budgets. Those details are then put back into a single sweeping bill that must pass the House and Senate before getting to Trump’s desk for his signature.

Passing the House Rules Committee means the bill will see a chamber-wide test vote that, if adopted, will set the stage for lawmakers to debate the bill before a final vote.

GOP CIVIL WAR ERUPTS OVER TRUMP’S LATEST AGENDA PUSH AS KEY REPUBLICANS THREATEN TO SINK MEGABILL

Advertisement

That vote is expected to occur Tuesday afternoon, with the final vote taking place the following day at 3:30 p.m., according to a preliminary schedule obtained by Fox News Digital.

Trump urged Republicans to advance the bill earlier Monday, arguing it would «get AS MUCH of THE SAVE AMERICA ACT as possible in a Budget Bill, along with aid to our incredible Farmers, and funding for our Military.»

Democrats, meanwhile, have accused Republicans of trying to unfairly sway elections with their SAVE America Act push.

Advertisement

«This is a phony issue that Donald Trump is creating. What’s amazing to me is that Donald Trump had the nerve to say to the Speaker of the House, who apparently didn’t object, that the most important thing that Republicans should focus on is voter suppression legislation, and that housing doesn’t matter, healthcare doesn’t matter, grocery bills don’t matter,» House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said earlier this year.

Voting booths

Voting booths are seen at Glass Elementary School’s polling station in Eagle Pass, Texas, on November 8, 2022.  (MARK FELIX/AFP via Getty Images)

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has repeatedly referred to the legislation as «Jim Crow 2.0.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«While the specific policies may have changed since the days of the Jim Crow South, the goal of the SAVE Act is the same: disenfranchising American citizens and making it harder for eligible people to vote, particularly low income Americans and people of color,» he said in February.

Republicans argue that the SAVE America Act — which would implement federal voter ID requirements and a proof of citizenship mandate in the voter registration process — would make American elections safer and more secure.

Advertisement

elections, congress, voting, mike johnson, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias