INTERNACIONAL
Clinton judge indefinitely blocks Trump’s $1.776B anti-weaponization fund

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge on Friday indefinitely blocked the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, even as another federal judge earlier this week declined to intervene after the Justice Department said the fund was no longer moving forward.
The court disputes have heightened pressure on the administration to formally dismantle the fund. While Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Congress the fund would not move forward, the settlement agreement and departmental directives that created the fund have not been formally rescinded. Critics argue this leaves open the possibility that the fund could still proceed in the future.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, a Clinton-appointed judge, extended a court order Friday preventing implementation of the fund, concluding that public assurances from administration officials were insufficient to eliminate concerns that it could later be revived.
Brinkema noted how Trump, «says he’s disappointed that something is not going forward,» suggesting this was evidence that the fund may «rear its head» at some point in the future.
JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKS TRUMP DOJ’S NEARLY $2B ‘ANTI-WEAPONIZATION’ FUND
President Donald Trump signs an executive order during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2026. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Over the weekend Trump shared on «Meet the Press» that he’d like to continue with the fund.
«If it was up to me, I’d pay them the kind of money that they deserve. People have been destroyed. Lives have been destroyed,» Trump said.
Brinkema gave the Justice Department a week to put in writing that the Anti-Weaponization Fund is being terminated and will not be reinstated.
The ruling comes days after U.S. District Judge Richard Leon rejected a separate request from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) seeking emergency intervention, saying he was willing to rely on Justice Department representations that the fund had effectively been abandoned.
ACTING AG BLANCHE REVEALS FATE OF TRUMP’S ‘ANTI-WEAPONIZATION FUND’ UNDER PRESSURE FROM HOUSE LAWMAKERS
But Leon, a George W. Bush-appointed judge, simultaneously warned administration officials not to treat his decision as permission to revive the program.
«I give the Justice Department this warning: Don’t play possum with me,» Leon said from the bench.
Blanche announced during a hearing earlier this month that the Anti-Weaponization Fund, which was born out of President Donald Trump’s lawsuit settlement with the IRS, would not be proceeding. The fund was intended to compensate alleged victims of government «lawfare,» but its creation sparked immediate backlash from Democrats, who characterized it as a «slush fund» that could ultimately benefit Trump’s political allies and individuals charged in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
TRUMP ADMIN PUSHES BACK ON ‘SLUSH FUND’ ATTACKS AGAINST ANTI-WEAPONIZATION FUND AND LAYS OUT WHO QUALIFIES

FILE – Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche was directed to obtain a certificate of pardon for Buyer. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Justice Department attorney Andrew Block argued before Leon that Blanche’s congressional testimony effectively mooted CREW’s challenge because the government had publicly committed not to move forward.
Leon repeatedly questioned why Blanche has not formally rescinded a May 18 order that established procedures for the fund in the first place, a question Block could not answer.
CREW attorney Nikhel Sus argued the settlement agreement that established the fund remains legally operative and contains upcoming deadlines requiring action.
WAY HARDER THAN IT SHOULD BE: WHY CONGRESS MAY BALK ON $1.7B COMPENSATION FUND

Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche testifies during a House Committee on Appropriations subcommittee hearing in the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., on June 2, 2026. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
According to Sus, a five-member board overseeing the fund must be established by June 17, while funding transfers are scheduled by July 17.
«On paper, the fund is still a legally operating entity,» Sus argued.
However, Leon ultimately accepted the government’s assurances for now that the fund is moot, but he noted that he can sanction attorneys who make false representations to the court.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
He also indicated he will continue considering CREW’s request for a preliminary injunction and suggested he could intervene if evidence emerges that the administration is attempting to revive the fund.
federal courts, federal judges, administration, congress, justice department
INTERNACIONAL
El Mundial de Cabo Verde: una historia de amor y pasión entre su gente y el fútbol

La diáspora caboverdiana
El milagro
El equipo de la diáspora: 26 hombres en un país sin estadio
Vozinha, el héroe
Pico Lopes y Cabo Verde, el nuevo condado de Irlanda
Un estadio financiado por China
INTERNACIONAL
We asked Americans to grade the economy. Then we asked if it would change their vote.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
As Americans gather in the nation’s capital to celebrate the Fourth of July and kick off the nation’s 250th anniversary festivities, Fox News Digital asked attendees at the Great American Fair on the National Mall whether the economy will influence how they vote in November.
While most respondents gave the U.S. economy a passing grade — most commonly a «B» — many said their ballots won’t hinge on inflation, jobs or economic growth alone. Instead, they pointed to values, leadership and party affiliation as the factors that will ultimately decide their vote.
The responses offer a snapshot of how some voters are weighing one of the nation’s top political issues ahead of the 2026 midterms.
TRUMP’S MANUFACTURING PROMISE IS DELIVERING IN ONE OF AMERICA’S OLDEST FACTORIES
Jay Miller from Louisiana told Fox News Digital that the U.S. economy does not impact his vote in November. (Fox News Digital)
Although respondents expressed cautious optimism about the economy’s direction, several said improving conditions would not be enough to change their political preferences, underscoring the role that broader ideological and cultural issues continue to play in shaping voter decisions.
«I would probably give the economy, compared to what it was, I would give it a B for sure,» Jay Miller of Lafayette, Louisiana, told Fox News Digital. «I think we are on the verge of an economic boom like we’ve never seen in our nation. And I’m glad that I’m living at this point and this time to witness it firsthand.»
Miller said he believes lawmakers should work more closely with President Donald Trump to advance the administration’s agenda, arguing that doing so would help unlock further economic growth.
Donna Festinger from Greenfield, Massachusetts, also gave the economy above average marks, grading it a «B-plus.»
«I think it’s on the rise and we’re getting more and more jobs, which I think really helps everyone in America,» the retired schoolteacher told Fox News Digital. «I think this administration is working hard to help everybody earn more money and to be able to save more money, which will circle back into a better economy.»
But not everyone in Washington, D.C. this week was as upbeat.
FOX NEWS POLL: MOST RATE THE ECONOMY NEGATIVELY, INCLUDING HALF OF REPUBLICANS

Bonnie from Hollister, California, told Fox News Digital that the most overpriced everyday item in the United States right now is gasoline. (Fox News Digital)
Bonnie from Hollister, California gave the economy a «C,» citing ongoing concerns about prices, but said she’s hopeful conditions will continue improving.
«I don’t think it’s great right now,» she said, citing high gas prices in her home state of California. «I would say maybe a C, but I’m hopeful that it’s going to turn around and be getting up to a B soon.»
Dan Cuda, 72, landed somewhere in the middle, saying the economy still has «a lot of upside potential» despite inflation.
«Groceries are pricey. I’m an Air Force veteran, and I’m still shopping at the military commissaries, and it’s noticeably up,» Cuda, a Maryland resident, told Fox News Digital.
Military commissaries are grocery stores on military installations that offer discounted prices to eligible service members, veterans and their families.
Despite higher food costs, Cuda still said, «I’d call it a… B economy.»
TRUMP VOTERS SAY COSTS ARE CRUSHING THEIR WALLETS — BUT LOOK PAST PRESIDENT FOR BLAME

President Donald Trump returned to the White House on a promise to revive American manufacturing and bring jobs back to the United States. (Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)
When the conversation shifted from the economy to politics, several Americans said economic conditions weren’t the deciding factor in how they plan to vote.
«It doesn’t really factor into my vote,» Cuda said, adding «I’m voting R no matter what.»
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
Miller echoed that sentiment, saying character and values outweigh economic performance when it comes to casting his vote at the ballot box.
«Give me good people,» he said. «Give me conservatives. Give me somebody with a little faith, a little family, a little value. And that’s got my vote.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Bonnie also said the economy matters, but won’t change her support for her preferred candidate.
«It does matter, but it’s not gonna keep me from voting for who I wanna vote for,» the Californian said.
economy, elections, politics, voting, midterm elections, donald trump, america 250
INTERNACIONAL
Marine Le Pen afrontará la próxima semana un veredicto clave para el futuro de su partido de cara a las elecciones en Francia

La posibilidad de que Marine Le Pen quede fuera de las elecciones presidenciales de Francia en 2027 se resolverá en cuestión de días, cuando el tribunal de apelaciones emita su veredicto definitivo. Si el fallo que se conocerá el próximo martes 7 de julio confirma la condena previa, la dirigente de Agrupación Nacional (RN) no podrá competir por el puesto que ha buscado durante más de una década.
En caso de confirmarse la inhabilitación, Le Pen se vería impedida de presentarse a la primera vuelta prevista para el 18 de abril del próximo año. Además, la imposición de un arresto domiciliario complicaría aún más su participación, pues restringiría de manera significativa su capacidad de campaña.
Durante el juicio de apelación, Le Pen sostuvo ante la corte que su formación actuó “de completa buena fe” y rechazó que existiera un sistema deliberado para desviar fondos del Parlamento Europeo. Sin embargo, la fiscalía defendió que la líder ultraderechista “profesionalizó” una práctica introducida por su padre, Jean-Marie Le Pen, al asumir el control del partido en 2011.
La dirigente política fue condenada en primera instancia a cuatro años de cárcel, con dos en suspenso, y a una inhabilitación de cinco años para ejercer cargos públicos, tras ser hallada culpable de emplear fondos europeos en beneficio de personal del partido en Francia entre 2004 y 2016. La acusación sostiene que el monto malversado asciende a varios millones de euros.
Le Pen declaró públicamente que solo decidirá si se presenta a las presidenciales después de conocer el resultado del tribunal. “No tengo miedo”, aseguró esta semana antes del fallo, y remarcó: “Si puedo presentarme, lo haré, siempre y cuando pueda hacer campaña”.
En caso de quedar fuera, la líder de RN sugirió que Jordan Bardella, actual presidente del partido y figura en ascenso con 30 años, podría asumir la candidatura. “Cuando eres candidato a la presidencia, necesitas tener total libertad de movimiento”, expresó Le Pen en una entrevista con el canal LCI y sumó que no puede depender de un magistrado para asistir a actos públicos.
El proceso judicial implica también a 24 ex diputados europeos, asistentes y contables, además del propio partido RN, acusados de operar un esquema para desviar recursos comunitarios. El tribunal dictaminó en primera instancia que existió una “estafa de empleos falsos” durante más de una década.
Le Pen calificó la investigación como una “caza de brujas” y denunció que algunos de sus seguidores enviaron amenazas de muerte a los jueces. Tanto ella como el partido y otras 11 personas presentaron una apelación. La fiscalía solicitó mantener la prohibición de cinco años y propuso una condena de cuatro años de prisión, con tres en suspenso, por el desvío de fondos.
Las encuestas recientes indican que la ultraderecha francesa lideraría la primera vuelta de los comicios de 2027, aunque existe incertidumbre respecto al desenlace en la segunda vuelta. Un sondeo de Harris Interactive Toluna realizado en mayo a más de 1.700 votantes mostró que Le Pen podría imponerse tanto a Jean-Luc Mélenchon, líder de la izquierda radical, como a los ex primeros ministros Gabriel Attal y Édouard Philippe.
La resolución del tribunal no solo definirá el futuro inmediato de la figura más relevante de la extrema derecha francesa, sino que también podría reconfigurar el escenario político de cara a las próximas elecciones presidenciales.
(Con información de AFP)
Crime,Government / Politics
POLITICA2 días agoCon la incorporación de Santilli al Gabinete, el Gobierno relanza su estrategia para las elecciones 2027
CHIMENTOS1 día agoEn medio de su separación, Magui Bravi contó por primera vez su traumático embarazo: «El parto fue de emergencia y…»
ECONOMIA1 día ago¿Se recupera el mercado de los autos?: qué muestran los números de las cinco marcas que más 0 km venden en el país





















