Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Explosive new report puts Jack Smith back in hot seat as Jim Jordan alleges he tried to ‘sway’ 2024 election

Published

on



House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is accusing former special counsel Jack Smith and the former Biden administration of trying to «sway» the 2024 election with the Department of Justice (DOJ) probe into President Donald Trump and his allies.

Jordan’s committee is releasing a new 57-page report arguing that Smith and his team «ran roughshod over key constitutional protections» and that the former Democratic White House used «the DOJ as a weapon against its political opponents.»

Advertisement

«The Special Counsel’s prosecutors tried to silence President Trump with unlawful gag orders, threatened defense attorneys, mishandled key documents, and broke protocol to release a massive trove of alleged evidence just weeks before the presidential election to sway public opinion,» the report said.

As many as 44 members of Congress in both the House and Senate had the contents of their text messages gathered by Smith’s team, Republicans have said.

BIDEN SPECIAL COUNSEL’S ‘RUNAWAY TRAIN’ SCOOPED UP SENSITIVE LAWMAKER INFO: ‘ABUSE OF POWER’

Advertisement

Jordan’s report accused the prosecutors of willfully skirting legal processes to get that information in a bid to hide their intelligence gathering.

JACK SMITH THRUST BACK INTO SPOTLIGHT AT BLANCHE HEARING OVER EXPOSED SENATORS’ MESSAGES

«Internal documents show that Arctic Frost investigators, and later Smith’s team, had only limited, perfunctory discussions with subject-matter experts in DOJ’s Public Integrity Section (PIN) about the constitutionality of these seizures,» the report said. «Although PIN cautioned that the subpoenas could be unconstitutional, PIN approved them nonetheless, asserting there was little ‘litigation risk’ because the gag orders that accompanied the subpoenas would prevent Members from ever discovering the seizures. As a result, Members of Congress were unaware of the Biden-Harris DOJ’s spying for more than two years.»

Advertisement

The report said investigators in the probe, colloquially known as «Arctic Frost,» sought Jordan’s own phone records from the period between August 2020 and January 2021 in relation to the federal probe into Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa.

VETERAN DEM BREAKS PARTY LINE AS JACK SMITH SPYING SCANDAL GRIPS CAPITOL HILL

PIN said lawmakers’ constitutional protections under the Speech or Debate Clause did not apply «because the subpoena targeted his personal cell phone accounts, and because the subpoenas were served to a third party,» i.e., Jordan’s phone carrier rather than Jordan himself. An email excerpt showed PIN Deputy Chief Jennifer Clarke noted there was a «litigation risk» with the argument but «approved the subpoenas nonetheless,» the report said.

Advertisement

A separate email excerpt in the report showed another PIN official, John Keller, also said there was a «litigation risk» in obtaining members of Congress’ toll records but noted it would be «minimal» due to the low likelihood of those lawmakers facing federal charges.

JACK SMITH HIT WITH CRIMINAL REFERRAL AS GOP MOVES TESTIMONY FIGHT TOWARD PROSECUTION

Keller’s email also noted the government had a «potentially meritorious argument that the calls over the relevant period — especially unsolicited incoming calls — would not constitute protected legislative acts.»

Advertisement

The report also alleged that the DOJ ran afoul of its own rules by improperly using an independent watchdog office to serve Jordan’s phone carrier when it significantly expanded what information it needed about him.

«On May 1, the DOJ issued a subpoena for Chairman Jordan’s phone records from January 1, 2020, to April 25, 2022—every call incoming and outgoing for more than two years.43 A Special Agent from the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG)—an entity that should be independent of the DOJ and maintain a reporting relationship with Congress as it investigates waste, fraud, and abuse—served the subpoena to Chairman Jordan’s phone carrier,» the report said.

OIG Special Agent Brian Burnett testified to the committee that the investigation as a whole was «unique» within his three decades of law enforcement experience in that he was following orders from an assistant U.S. attorney rather than investigating himself, the report alleged.

Advertisement

«A normal investigation would be, I would do the investigation, become familiar with everything, you know, do grand jury subpoenas, do the normal investigative process, follow the normal investigative steps. But, in this case, those steps were given to us by the prosecution team,» an excerpt from Burnett’s testimony showed.

MIKE DAVIS: WHY CRIMINAL REFERRAL OF JACK SMITH WAS 100% JUSTIFIED

Jordan’s report also noted that Smith’s team backed down from grand jury subpoenas sent to AT&T for two other lawmakers’ phone records after the phone carrier questioned their legal basis.

Advertisement

TRUMP DOJ WITHDRAWS SUBPOENAS TARGETING NEW YORK TIMES JOURNALISTS AMID LEAK PROBE

«In May 2023, Special Counsel Smith sent AT&T a grand jury subpoena that included a request for phone records associated with AT&T accounts for two other members of Congress. However, when AT&T raised questions with … Special Counsel Smith’s office concerning the legal basis for seeking records of members of Congress, the Special Counsel did not pursue the subpoena further, and no records were produced,» a letter highlighted in the report said.

Smith testified to congressional investigators that he did not «have any recollection of that,» the report said.

Advertisement

The report goes as far as to say Smith «admitted privately» to then-Attorney General Merrick Garland that lawmakers «likely have a valid Speech or Debate privilege immunizing them from compelled testimony,» but that Garland still gave his «blessing» to Smith for subpoenas «compelling the production of Members’ protected legislative records.»

Jordan reaffirmed past GOP-led probes’ conclusions that prosecutors improperly bypassed a DOJ «filter team» process to obtain the 44 lawmakers’ and Trump officials’ records. Of those 44 lawmakers, two were Democrats.

In the report’s conclusion, Jordan urged the House of Representatives to take up legislation led by Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., barring any government entity from obtaining records — whether by subpoena, court order, warrant, or otherwise — that is likely to implicate the Speech or Debate Clause.

Advertisement

The bill, the Congressional Records Protection Act, advanced through the House Judiciary Committee but has so far not gotten a House floor vote.

Jordan argued it would not just protect members of Congress but the people they serve, too.

«The Speech or Debate Clause protects not only legislators, but American citizens too. It guarantees that the people’s representatives in Congress may advocate effectively on their constituents’ behalf without the threat of interference or intimidation by the Executive Branch,» the report argued.

Advertisement

Smith has so far stood by his team’s findings and maintained his innocence amid a barrage of GOP attacks.

In his testimony to Republicans, he laid blame on Trump for prosecutors collecting GOP lawmakers’ records.

«I think who should be accountable for this is Donald Trump. These records are people, in the case of the Senators, Donald Trump directed his co-conspirators to call these people to further delay the proceedings. He chose to do that. If Donald Trump had chosen to call a number of Democratic Senators, we would have gotten toll records for Democratic Senators. So responsibility for why these records, why we collected them…that lies with Donald Trump,» Smith said in a report excerpt.

Advertisement

Digital reached out to Jack Smith’s law firm, Heaphy, Smith, Harbach & Windom, for comment.

politics, jim jordan, justice department, congress, house of representatives politics

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

El presidente de Irán negó que estén fabricando armas nucleares y le advirtió a EE.UU.: “Nos golpearon, pero no nos arrodillaremos”

Published

on


El presidente de Irán, Masoud Pezeshkian, negó la fabricación de armas nucleares y le contestó a Donald Tump, que ayer prometió en la Asamblea General de la ONU “aniquilar a la República Islámica” en caso de no llegar a un acuerdo, y afirmó: “Nos golpearon, pero no nos arrodillaremos”.

“El presidente de Estados Unidos nos calificó de terroristas. Nosotros hemos sido víctimas del terrorismo”, dijo Pezeshkian a los líderes mundiales tras recordar el asesinato por Israel y Estados Unidos del líder supremo Ali Jamenei “sin ningún marco legal ni motivo”, así como los bombardeos contra hospitales y una escuela primaria en los que murieron 156 nenes y adultos.

Advertisement

“Provocaron el martirio y asesinaron a nuestros científicos, a nuestros hombres, mujeres y niños. Niños inocentes que, en realidad, no habían cometido ningún delito ni pecado”, declaró Pezeshkian

El presidente de Irán, Masoud Pezeshkian, recordó el bombardeo contra una escuela primaria de Iran en la Asamble General de la ONU. (Foto: Reuters/Mike Segar).

El delegado de EE.UU . abandonó la sala durante el discurso del presidente de Irán

Mientras pronunciaba estas palabras, el delegado estadounidense se levantó y abandonó la sala.

El presidente de Irán: “Necesitamos contar con la fuerza”

“Necesitamos contar con la fuerza porque un pueblo que no se puede defender en el mundo de hoy será pisoteado”, sostuvo el mandatario.

Advertisement

Y agregó: “Los poderosos en lugar de pensar en la humanidad, la justicia y la democracia, parecen ser los que crean la inestabilidad y la destrucción”.

El mandatario negó la fabricación de armas nucleares y afirmó que su país busca tecnología nuclear “para el progreso, no para amenazar a las sociedades con armas”.

“Durante años, se ha hablado de centrifugadoras, sanciones internacionales y otras etiquetas en relación con nuestra tecnología nuclear. Pero, para nuestro país, la tecnología nuclear con fines pacíficos forma parte de nuestro progreso inherente”, señaló Pezeshkian, aludiendo a la necesidad de avances en sectores como la agricultura y el “suministro de energía eléctrica”.

Advertisement
Pezeshkian también recordó el aseisnato de Ali Jamenei y dijo que su país fue víctima de terrorismo. (Foto: Reuters(Caitlin Ochs).
Pezeshkian también recordó el aseisnato de Ali Jamenei y dijo que su país fue víctima de terrorismo. (Foto: Reuters(Caitlin Ochs).

Irán no acepta que la tecnología nuclear esté a disposición exclusiva de unos pocos, de un puñado de actores. No lo haremos. No bajaremos la cabeza ni renunciaremos a un derecho que nos pertenece por naturaleza. Lo decimos claramente: nada de armas nucleares y ninguna limitación a la tecnología nuclear con fines pacíficos. Nuestra paz no vendrá del campo de batalla; es necesario, en cambio, garantizar la seguridad que requieren el pueblo y la nación de Irán”, afirmó.

Pezeshkian también acusó a Israel de “cometer un genocidio” en Gaza tras recordar la muerte de más de 70.000 palestinos en la guerra con Hamas.

“Están cometiendo genocidio y luego tachan a otros de terroristas”, dijo. Además, recordó que el Israel dispone de armas nucleares y que no es parte del Tratado sobre la No Proliferación de las Armas Nucleares. “Las armas nucleares están en Israel, pero los inspectores están en Irán”, sostuvo.

El presidente de Irán, sobre el estrecho de Ormuz

Pezeshkian dijo que Teherán no permitirá que el estrecho de Ormuz sea usado para llevar a cabo “agresiones contra su país“.

Advertisement

“No podemos permitir que algunos tengan libre acceso y defiendan sus intereses a través de esa vía de navegación, mientras que, al mismo tiempo, utilizan esa vía para imponernos su agresión”, afirmó Pezeshkian ante la Asamblea General de la organización. 

“Nos cierran el acceso a nuestra propia vía navegable”, señaló Pezeshkian al aludir al bloqueo de los puertos iraníes por parte de las fuerzas navales de EE.UU .

El presidente de Irán: “Teherán nunca se arrodillará”

El presidente de Irán adoptó un tono desafiante y afirmó que Trump “debe saber que la resistencia del pueblo iraní solo aumentará frente a las sanciones, el incremento de la presión y el aumento de las intimidaciones”.

Advertisement

“Nunca inclinaremos la cabeza ni nos arrodillaremos”, insistió ezeshkian.

“El señor Trump y quienes intentan acosarnos deben saber que estamos dispuestos a dialogar sin aceptar el idioma de la fuerza”, cerró Pezeshkian acerca de las negociaciones con EE.UU . para poner fin a la guerra.

Qué se sabe de la reunión entre diplomatas de EE.UU. e Irán

El martes, el canciller de Irán, Abás Araqchi, y el enviado de Estados Unidos Steve Witkoff se reunieron durante tres horas. Trump alificó de “muy buena” la reunión y aseguró que había previsto otro diálogo “en un futuro muy cercano”.

Advertisement

Según la prensa estatal iraní, en esta reunión Teherán presentó a Washington sus condiciones para reabrir el estrecho de Ormuz, que incluyen “el levantamiento inmediato del bloqueo naval (de Estados Unidos a puertos iraníes), el pronto pago de todos los activos iraníes que están congelados y el fin de la guerra en todos los frentes de resistencia”.

Un poco antes, desde la tribuna de la ONU, Trump dijo que tenía la opción entre conducir “al infierno” a Irán o llegar a un acuerdo, y predijo que se encontraría una solución diplomática después de las elecciones legislativas de noviembre en Estados Unidos.

Irán, ONU, Asamblea General de la ONU

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Pro-life leader sounds alarm after doctor gets 6 months for forcing abortion pills on girlfriend

Published

on



Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of SBA Pro-Life America, told Digital that U.S. law has not caught up with the growing availability of abortion medication, allowing predators who use the drugs to end pregnancies without women’s consent to face relatively light consequences.

She pointed to the case of Hassan-James Abbas, an Ohio man accused of forcing abortion pills into his pregnant girlfriend’s mouth in December 2024. He was sentenced earlier this month to six months in prison.

Advertisement

The woman, Jona Affholder, went to the hospital and ultimately lost the baby.

«The fact that this guy got only six months in prison for his crime says a lot about the state of our culture right now,» Dannenfelser said. «This was a very much wanted pregnancy. She could support the baby on her own and didn’t need his help. But he had other ideas in mind.»

PRO-LIFE CEO PREDICTS TRUMP FDA NOMINEE COULD BRING RENEWED SCRUTINY TO ABORTION DRUG RISKS

Advertisement

Abbas, then a surgical resident at the University of Toledo, began dating Affholder in early October 2024, according to a lawsuit she filed against him.

Sometime in December that year, Affholder got pregnant. Authorities said once he found out, he illegally obtained mifepristone and misoprostol using his estranged wife’s identification information. It is unclear whether Abbas prescribed the drugs himself.

Taken together, the two medications terminate early pregnancies: mifepristone blocks progesterone, a hormone needed to sustain the pregnancy, while misoprostol causes contractions that expel the fetus.

Advertisement

TRUMP-BACKED VIVEK RAMASWAMY WINS OHIO GOP GUBERNATORIAL PRIMARY, WILL FACE DEMOCRAT AMY ACTON

Under current FDA rules, patients do not have to see a physician in person to receive a prescription, allowing mifepristone to be prescribed after a telehealth visit and mailed by a certified pharmacy.

After getting his hands on the pills, he began offering Affholder hot chocolate and tea, «which was out of character for their relationship,» according to the Lucas County Prosecutor’s Office.

Advertisement

On Dec. 18, 2024, Abbas invited her to his home in Holland, Ohio. Prosecutors said despite being aware of Affholder’s intention to keep the baby, he climbed on top of her in bed, held her down and shoved crushed abortion pills into her mouth.

Court records show that when Affholder tried to call 911, he took the phone out of her hand and hung it up. Eventually, she was able to leave Abbas’s residence and get to the hospital.

Affholder described this experience in a Daily Wire op-ed published in June 2026.

Advertisement

HAWLEY SENDS CRIMINAL REFERRAL OF ‘LEFT-WING DARK-MONEY’ GROUP OVER MAILED ABORTION DRUGS

«I fought him off and ran to call 911. He took my cell and my keys, blocking me from leaving. I rushed to the kitchen, trying to rinse the powder from my mouth. But he continued to restrain me, buying each minute for the drugs to do their intended purpose of killing our kid,» Affholder wrote.

«When he assumed the drugs had sufficiently aborted our baby, he returned my belongings, and I went straight to the hospital,» she added. 

Advertisement

According to Affholder’s account, she began hemorrhaging after arriving at the hospital and ultimately miscarried.

Abbas, who was arrested the next day, initially pleaded not guilty. In May 2026, he pleaded no contest to four felony charges: disrupting public services, unlawfully distributing abortion-inducing drugs, identity fraud and using deception to obtain a dangerous drug.

As part of the plea agreement, prosecutors dropped charges of abduction and tampering with evidence. The state had alleged that Abbas drove away from the home on the night of the assault and threw the remaining pills out his car window.

Advertisement

BLUE STATE SHIELD LAWS ALLOWED 330K ABORTION PILLS TO BE SENT TO ABORTION BAN STATES, PRO-LIFE GROUP FINDS

Dannenfelser contrasted Abbas’ six-month sentence with Ohio’s penalties for rape, which can carry years or even life in prison depending on the circumstances.

«But… this coercion and this attack that led to the death of her wanted child gets only six months,» she said.

Advertisement

In February 2024, Mason Herring, of Texas, received the exact same sentence — six months — for slipping misoprostol into his then wife’s drinks. The baby survived but initially faced severe developmental delays.

«If you are Amy Acton running for governor [of Ohio], if you are Sherrod Brown running for the Senate, you need to answer for this because their Republican opponents are very much for limiting these drugs or controlling them at least,» Dannenfelser added.

Digital reached out to both campaigns for comment.

Advertisement

Dannenfelser also criticized Planned Parenthood and pro-choice advocates, accusing them of failing to speak out about Affholder’s case and others like it.

«Where are the advocates, the feminists, the people who are against the coercion of women, the people who are ‘my body, my choice,’ the people who say that medical care is all that they’re really looking for,» she said.

Planned Parenthood does not appear to have publicly commented on Affholder’s case, but the organization has explicitly condemned the act of giving women abortion drugs without their knowledge or consent.

Advertisement

Digital reached out to Planned Parenthood for comment.

Dannenfelser said the Department of Justice should take a more active role in prosecuting cases involving forced abortions.

«We do have every hope that the attorney general will move on this, and he’s referenced it at the Dallas convention that people who are pushing death in a pill will be disappointed,» she said. «That is the surest way to justice.»

Advertisement

On Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, joined Dannenfelser in demanding Attorney General Todd Blanche take action, referencing Affholder’s case.

«My constituent was held down and force-fed crushed-up mail-order abortion pills,» Moreno wrote to Blanche. «Unsurprisingly, reckless Biden-era mail-in abortion policies are responsible for this hell-on-earth tragedy.»

abortion, politics, reproductive health, pregnancy, drugs

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Exportadores uruguayos optaron por cargar mercadería en otros puertos de la región por conflicto en Montevideo

Published

on



El puerto de Montevideo está en conflicto desde abril, cuando comenzaron las negociaciones entre la Terminal Cuenca del Plata y su sindicato por un nuevo convenio colectivo. Las más de 40 paralizaciones que dispuso el gremio de trabajadores generó preocupación en empresarios, que advierten por una posible pérdida del prestigio de Uruguay. El gobierno se negó a declarar la esencialidad de este servicio, pero sí resolvió requerir “servicios mínimos” para asegurar la continuidad operativa.

El sector empresarial ha advertido por el daño reputacional que generan las constantes paralizaciones de la actividad.

Advertisement

La Terminal Cuenca del Plata (TCP) es la única especializada en contenedores del puerto de Montevideo. Su concesión está otorgada hasta el 2081 a la empresa belga Katoen Natie, que es la accionista de la terminal en un 80%. El restante 20% lo controla el Estado uruguayo, a través de la Administración Nacional de Puertos (ANP).

Una vista aérea muestra contenedores apilados en el puerto, en Montevideo (REUTERS/Mariana Greif)

El convenio entre TCP y su sindicato venció en abril y en ese momento se inició una conflictiva negociación que está lejos de ver luz verde. La cantidad de jornales mensuales que se le aseguran a los trabajadores es una de las principales trabas del conflicto.

El lunes hubo un paro nacional en todos los puertos, lo que significó que el conflicto escaló de TCP. Esto motivó una declaración de 28 cámaras empresariales, en la que expresaron que la situación desatada por las continuas interrupciones en los servicios hace “insostenible” la producción, el comercio y la economía del país. “La situación ha alcanzado un punto que exige una respuesta urgente y definitiva”, decía la declaración.

Advertisement

El conflicto ha llevado a que exportadores salteen el puerto de Montevideo.

En la imagen, el edificio de la Administración de Aduanas y Puertos, en Montevideo, Uruguay, el 3 de enero de 2024. REUTERS/Mariana Greif

“Como medida de contingencia y de emergencia hay empresas que ante la duda están tomando la decisión de salir por otro puerto. Esperamos y buscamos que no sea una medida permanente”, dijo la presidenta de la Unión de Exportadores, Carmen Porteiro, a Canal 12.

Esto se da en un contexto de caída de las exportaciones, algo que no se explica solamente por el conflicto portuario.

Advertisement

“Lo que necesitamos es que la puerta de salida de la producción nacional y la puerta de entrada de los insumos esté abierta para que las empresas permanezcan en Uruguay”, agregó Porteiro.

La intervención del Poder Ejecutivo

El gobierno, a través de los ministerios de Trabajo y de Transporte, ha intervenido de forma directa en las negociaciones. Muchas de las instancias, de hecho, ocurren ante estas autoridades.

El 11 de septiembre, el gobierno declaró los “servicios mínimos”.

Advertisement

En la resolución, los ministros Juan Castillo (Trabajo) y Lucía Etcheverry (Transporte) expresaron su preocupación por el conflicto. “Las medidas gremiales adoptadas en el curso del conflicto han afectado seriamente la normalidad del funcionamiento de la única terminal especializada de contenedores del país”, dice el documento oficial.

El ministro de Trabajo de Uruguay, Juan Castillo (Presidencia)

Para tomar la decisión, el gobierno consideró que la paralización pone “en inminente riesgo a un servicio de importancia trascendental, en atención a la afectación que provoca en la producción nacional y en el comercio exterior del país”.

Resulta necesario asegurar servicios mínimos de funcionamiento y operación en la Terminal Cuenca del Plata, de forma de mitigar los efectos derivados de la situación del conflicto y preservar un nivel indispensable de continuidad operativa”, argumentó el gobierno de Orsi.

Advertisement

Estos “servicios mínimos” implican que en el puerto continúen funcionando las actividades indispensables aun cuando haya paralizaciones. La medida es de carácter “transitorio y limitado”, en el marco de este conflicto. Es decir, se aplicará mientras continúen las negociaciones por el nuevo convenio colectivo.

Puerto de Montevideo con más de 40 días de paro durante 2026 (EFE/ Sofía Torres)

¿Qué servicios están asegurados en el puerto? La resolución del gobierno detalla que obligatoriamente deben atenderse los servicios de carga y descarga de buques, de recepción de contenedores (sea por transporte carretero o fluvial –se deben atender unos 25 contenedores por hora que llegan en camiones) y el almacenamiento y depósito.

Además, la resolución detalla la cantidad de trabajadores que deben haber área por área.

Advertisement

El martes hubo una nueva instancia tripartita en el Ministerio de Trabajo y el Poder Ejecutivo quedó en enviar una propuesta a las partes.

Continue Reading

Tendencias