Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Pro-US conservative faces leftist in Peru’s high-stakes presidential runoff

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Peruvians head to the polls in a pivotal presidential runoff June 7 in an election that could reshape not only the country’s future but also the balance of power across Latin America.

Advertisement

Two candidates are vying to become the country’s ninth president in just 10 years. Conservative candidate Keiko Fujimori is campaigning on law and order, free-market policies and closer ties with the United States, while left-wing challenger Roberto Sánchez represents a political movement that many see as a continuation of the leftist currents that have challenged U.S. interests in the region.

José Ignacio Beteta, executive director of Asociación de Contribuyentes, a think tank in Peru, told Fox News Digital, «Peru’s June 7 runoff carries consequences well beyond its borders. When analyzed against the current U.S. National Security Strategy, this election will determine whether Peru consolidates its alignment as a U.S. partner or devolves into deeper geopolitical contention. Peru’s institutional weakness has already allowed China to expand into strategic sectors.»

MEET ‘CHINA’S MAN IN LIMA’ WHO JETTED OVER TO US TO COLLECT TRAINS DONATED BY BIDEN ADMIN

Advertisement

Peru’s presidential candidates Keiko Fujimori (right) for the Fuerza Popular party, and Roberto Sanchez (left) for the Juntos por el Peru party, wave during a debate in Lima on May 31, 2026, ahead of the presidential runoff election on June 7.  (Ernesto Benavides/AFP Via Getty Images)

Beteta added, «Meanwhile, the vote is seen as a choice between a return to freer and more competitive economic and security policies with Fujimori and a second attempt at left-wing governance with Sanchez, a binary that mirrors South America’s broader ideological fractures.»

The election follows years of political instability in Peru, a country that has seen multiple presidents removed from office over the past decade and remains deeply divided between urban and rural constituencies.

Advertisement

Sunday’s election’s outcome is expected to be very close, with the possibility of a final result not being known for days, according to the Associated Press. 

For Washington, Peru’s election represents more than a domestic political contest. It is another test of the broader political direction of Latin America. Over the past several years, several countries in the region have experienced electoral shifts toward center-right or conservative governments, including Argentina under Javier Milei and Ecuador under Daniel Noboa who are all more friendly to Washington.

A Fujimori victory would reinforce that trend and could position Peru alongside a growing bloc of governments favoring tougher approaches to crime, stronger ties with the United States and market-oriented economic policies.

Advertisement
Keiko Fujimori

Peru’s presidential candidate for the Fuerza Popular party, Keiko Fujimori, waves to supporters during her closing campaign rally in Lima on June 4, 2026. Right-wing candidate Keiko Fujimori and leftist Roberto Sanchez will face off in Peru’s presidential runoff on June 7, 2026.  (Anthony Nino de Guzman / AFP via Getty Images)

Presidential candidate Keiko Fujimori told Fox News Digital that if she wins, «My government’s foreign policy will be based on a very clear premise: defending Peru’s interests. Specifically, regarding the United States, my government will seek a relationship of cooperation, mutual respect and investment promotion. We welcome the Trump administration’s renewed perspective on Latin America and, especially, on Peru, which occupies a strategic geopolitical position in the region.»

Fujimori continued: «We want to seize this opportunity by generating greater stability, legal certainty, and confidence for investment. Peru must always be a country open to the world, committed to freedom, free competition, and the free market. Our goal is to lay the groundwork so that investors from the United States and around the world find in Peru a reliable, stable, and attractive country in which to invest, produce, and create jobs.»

Fox News Digital reached out to Sánchez’ campaign but did not get a response.

Advertisement

ALLIANCE WITH US ‘DISMANTLED’ BY LEFTIST PETRO REGIME, COLOMBIA’S FORMER DEFENSE MINISTER SAYS

Robert Sanchez, Peru election

Peru’s presidential candidate for the Juntos por el Peru party, Roberto Sanchez, speaks during a campaign rally at the Plaza Tupac Amaru in Cusco, Peru, on June 2, 2026.  (Jose Angulo / AFP via Getty Images)

Peruvian analyst and legal expert Lucas Ghersi told Fox News Digital, «Roberto Sánchez represents a rather radical left. His platform includes nationalizations and expropriations, and he is close to Evo Morales and Nicolás Maduro. This election is highly polarizing Peruvian society.»

Ghersi continued, «If Keiko Fujimori wins, she would have a good relationship with the United States. She is a reasonable person who defends the constitutional framework and the rule of law, and she has ties to the United States because she has done academic work at Florida International University (FIU).

Advertisement

«Roberto Sánchez, on the other hand, would create tension in the relationship with the United States. During his campaign and in the presidential debate, he bitterly criticized Peru’s purchase of F-16 jets from the United States. He said that Peru shouldn’t buy from the United States and should instead use that money for health or education. He also has ties to illegal mining and has been accused of drug trafficking. This could create tensions in the relationship with the United States.»

TRUMP LOOMS LARGE AS BIDEN SET TO MEET CHINA’S XI DURING LATIN AMERICA SUMMITS

Keiko Fujimori supporters

Supporters of Peru’s presidential candidate Keiko Fujimori, for the Fuerza Popular party, shout slogans outside the Lima Convention Center ahead of her debate with Roberto Sanchez, for the Juntos por el Peru party, in Lima on May 31, 2026. Peru will hold the presidential runoff election on June 7.  (Connie France/AFP via Getty Images)

Ghersi concluded, «Peru is a very strategic country and has been the focus of competition between the United States and China. Peru has one of the largest proven copper reserves and is a major gold producer. Therefore, both China and the United States are vying for influence in Peru, and China has been promoting mega-investment projects there, such as a mega-port that is already operational. In response, the United States offered to renovate the Peruvian Navy’s base and invest in large port projects.»

Advertisement

A Fujimori victory would likely be interpreted in Washington as a continuation of the recent trend toward center-right governance in parts of Latin America. Fujimori has campaigned on restoring public security, strengthening economic growth, and maintaining Peru’s market-oriented model. Her supporters argue that these policies could encourage greater foreign investment and closer cooperation with the United States on security and economic issues.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A Sánchez victory would present a different scenario. Although he has recently moderated portions of his platform, emphasizing respect for private property, free trade agreements and macroeconomic stability, questions remain about how his administration would approach relations with Washington and regional left-wing movements.

Advertisement

The next Peruvian president will help determine whether one of South America’s most important countries moves closer to Washington, or charts a leftward course.

The Associated Press reports that voting is mandatory in Peru for citizens from the ages of 18 to 70, with more than 27 million people registered.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement



latin america, south america, national security, china

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

RINOs y YOLOs: quiénes son los nuevos enemigos de Donald Trump dentro de su propio partido

Published

on


No tienen cascos, tampoco armas de fuego, pero son protagonistas de una guerra soterrada y a veces estridente contra el presidente Donald Trump. El jefe de la Casa Blanca los detesta, los insulta, pero eso no es una novedad en el comportamiento del magnate si no fuera porque son legisladores de su propio partido, un conjunto de republicanos en el Congreso que comienzan a hartarse de Trump.

Si bien el presidente aún parece mantener el control del partido con mano firme, hay dos grupos bautizados en la jerga política de Washington como RINOs y YOLOs, que amenazan con ser la pesadilla del magnate para las elecciones legislativas de noviembre y para lo que resta de su mandato.

Advertisement

¿Qué es un RINO?

Es el acrónimo de “Republicans In Name Only” (Republicanos solo de nombre). Tradicionalmente se definía así a los republicanos que no adoptaban en forma consistente los valores y principios conservadores del partido, o sea que podían votar con sus rivales demócratas en cuestiones políticas clave, como impuestos y política fiscal, temas sociales o culturales.

“Sin embargo, en los últimos años, Trump ha utilizado cada vez más esta etiqueta para caracterizar a cualquiera dentro del partido que no le sea suficientemente leal, independientemente de sus posturas políticas”, señala a Clarín Matthew Wilson, profesor de Ciencias Políticas de Southern Methodist University.

Advertisement

“Para Trump, él ES el Partido Republicano, por lo que no apoyarlo en cualquier cuestión legal o política importante convierte a alguien en un «RINO», sin importar cuán conservador sea”.

Para John Mark Hansen, profesor de Ciencias Políticas de University of Chicago, explicó a Clarín que “RINO es un término despectivo que se utiliza al menos desde la administración de George W. Bush”.

Hoy “es otro elemento del repertorio de insultos y burlas de Trump, como «bajo coeficiente intelectual», pero limitado a los republicanos. Los objetivos cambian a diario. En realidad, hoy un RINO es cualquier funcionario republicano que lo haya irritado ese día”, agregó.

Advertisement

Ejemplos de republicanos RINOs -que se desvían de la ortodoxia conservadora en cuestiones políticas importantes– hoy serían las senadoras Susan Collins de Maine y Lisa Murkowski de Alaska. Sin embargo, Trump ha añadido a esta lista a personas como John Cornyn de Texas, Thom Tillis de Carolina del Norte y Bill Cassidy de Luisiana, todos conservadores convencidos que demostraron poco entusiasmo por Trump a nivel personal y/o criticaron algunas de sus acciones o declaraciones en algún momento. Han “traicionado” al presidente en votaciones clave.

Cuando Trump llama RINO a alguien, busca transmitir a sus seguidores que esa persona no representa su movimiento «Make America Great Again» (MAGA) y que, aunque tenga una credencial republicana, no merece el apoyo de la base del partido. En el pasado, ya sufrieron esa etiqueta dirigentes muy conservadores en temas fiscales, aborto o armas, como Liz Cheney o Adam Kinzinger, que fueron calificados de RINOs por enfrentarse a Trump, especialmente tras el ataque al Capitolio del 6 de enero de 2021.

El Congreso, en Washington, escenario de tensiones en el Partido Republicano. Foto: AP

¿Qué es un YOLO?

Es un acrónimo de “You Only Live Once” (sólo se vive una vez), una expresión que en lenguaje cotidiano se traduce en hacer actividades audaces o peligrosas, que en general uno no se permite. Pero se ha trasladado a la política estadounidense para referirse a los «republicanos YOLO».

Advertisement

Se trata de aquellos legisladores que perdieron sus escaños en las primarias o decidieron retirarse porque estaban hartos de Trump o porque el presidente decidió apoyar en sus distritos a candidatos alternativos que le eran más fieles.

“Su condición de Pato Rengo (ya están a fin de su mandato y no renuevan) les permite ahora, durante el resto de su gestión, votar según su criterio y conciencia sin presiones políticas”, señala Wilson. Pueden ser RINOs y YOLO al mismo tiempo.

El congresista Don Bacon y los senadores Tom Tillis y Mitch McConnell anunciaron su retiro y votan sabiendo que nunca más tendrán que enfrentarse a sus electores en las primarias. El representante Thomas Massie perdió su banca contra un candidato apoyado por Trump.

Advertisement

«Si el poder legislativo siempre vota con el presidente, tenemos un rey», dijo Massie. El senador Bill Cassidy perdió las primarias ante un candidato apoyado por el presidente y al día siguiente dijo: «Como está estructurada nuestra Constitución, el Congreso debería exigir responsabilidades al Poder Ejecutivo».

“Esto no significa que se conviertan repentinamente en izquierdistas. Significa, sin embargo, que pueden oponerse a las iniciativas y maniobras de Trump que consideren imprudentes o incluso directamente inconstitucionales”, agrega Wilson.

Para Hansen, los YOLO tienen “una justificación mordaz para hacer lo correcto, cometer un acto de principios, aunque a Trump no le guste, o es un reconocimiento resignado de no tener nada que perder porque te ha obligado a dejar el cargo”.

Advertisement
Una marcha anti Trump en abril, frente a la sede de la Corte Suprema, en Washington. Foto: AP

Obstáculos para la agenda del presidente

Aunque el presidente mantiene un control firme sobre los votantes republicanos, el club RINO y YOLO que está en expansión podría obstaculizar su agenda en todo, desde la guerra de Irán hasta la financiación migratoria, en un momento en que su partido tiene una mayoría frágil en el Congreso.

El presidente se ha enfrentado repetidamente a varios legisladores de su partido en los últimos meses. Se enfureció cuando no le quisieron aprobar un fondo de US$1.800 millones para defensa judicial de sus aliados políticos. Los ha acusado de no acelerar la aprobación de una reforma electoral que él considera clave para estas elecciones (muchos RINOs no creen que haya habido fraude en los comicios de 2020, como argumenta Trump), los atacó porque no le aprueban la reforma del salón de baile de la Casa Blanca y, sobre todo, los consideró “antipatriotas” porque se oponen a la guerra con Irán.

El presidente les ha dedicado un reguero de insultos de todo tipo: “inútiles”, “vagos”, “perdedores”, “débiles”.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, muchos de ellos ven que Trump está enfrascado en la guerra y en los aranceles, dos temas que son impopulares entre el electorado estadounidense porque impactan directamente en su bolsillo. Y se alarman porque sienten que el presidente está distanciado de lo que realmente le interesa, que es la inflación y la “asequibilidad”, la capacidad de acceder a viviendas, salud y objetos de la vida diaria, que en estos tiempos está complicada.

Para el experto, YOLOs y RINOs “sin duda, pueden complicar las elecciones de mitad de mandato para Trump, ya que probablemente se opondrán a él en cuestiones de procedimiento importantes para su agenda (como la eliminación del filibusterismo en el Senado) y mostrarán un apoyo tibio a los republicanos más afines a Trump que aspiran a reemplazarlos”.

Para Morris Fiorina, profesor de Ciencias Políticas de Stanford University, “Trump parece estar por encima de toda ideología. Juzga todo en función de sus preferencias. Antes, ser RINO era una acusación dirigida a quienes los conservadores querían etiquetar como «moderados indecisos», pero dado que Trump ahora «se considera la personificación del Partido Republicano, el término suele significar no ceder ante sus deseos”, afirmó a Clarín. Sin embargo, Fiorina señala que “si bien vemos tensiones, todavía no hemos visto fisuras reales”

Advertisement

Hansen afirma que “Trump tiene un historial casi perfecto de lograr que los votantes republicanos se deshagan de quienes se le oponen. Normalmente, los presidentes hacen la vista gorda por el bien común del partido. No el presidente. A Trump solo le importa Trump. Es un abuso de poder, una venganza: si no haces lo que él quiere, te atrapará”.

De cara a las elecciones legislativas, Fiorina señala que “todo lo que perjudica a Trump beneficia a los demócratas, por supuesto. La cuestión es si los demócratas son capaces de aprovechar las oportunidades que se les presentan, algo que no está en absoluto garantizado”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Gulf countries strongly condemn Iran’s drone attack on Bahrain as rising tensions threaten MOU

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Several Gulf countries have strongly denounced Iran’s Saturday drone strikes on the island nation of Bahrain, while vowing to stand united against any possible aggression from Tehran in the future.

Advertisement

This escalation poses the greatest threat yet to the memorandum of understanding signed last week by President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

After Iran struck a cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz on Friday, the U.S. launched overnight airstrikes on Iranian missile, drone and radar sites. Iran responded Saturday with the drone strikes on Bahrain, which hosts the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet.

TRUMP IRAN FRAMEWORK GAMBLES ON DIPLOMACY DESPITE WARNING TEHRAN WILL ‘LIE AND CHEAT’

Advertisement

Smoke rises after reported Iranian missile attacks, following strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran, in Manama, Bahrain, Feb. 28, 2026. (Reuters)

The Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi, called Iran’s attack on Bahrain «treacherous,» adding that it will undermine ongoing peace efforts in the Middle East.

The GCC represents the interests of Bahrain, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, several of which released their own statements condemning Iran.

Advertisement

Bahrain itself issued a response, confirming that Iran flew a number of drones into its territory and calling the strikes a «flagrant threat» to the nation’s security. It remains unclear exactly which areas Iran targeted.

US ALLY KUWAIT CONDEMNS ‘BRUTAL AND ONGOING IRANIAN ATTACKS’ AFTER AIRPORT WAS HIT

Trump at Faith & Freedom Coalition's policy conference

President Donald Trump leaves the stage after speaking at the Faith & Freedom Coalition’s policy conference on Friday, June 26, 2026. Iran’s latest strike is the latest threat to the MOU he signed that enacted a ceasefire. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

«While the Ministry condemns this heinous aggression, it affirms that the Iranian regime’s continued attacks, at a time when regional and international efforts are moving towards de-escalation, place the sole responsibility on Tehran for undermining peace efforts, and reveals an approach based on destabilizing security, exporting chaos, and undermining regional stability,» Bahrain’s Foreign Ministry also said Saturday.

Advertisement

Officials in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) also came out with statements on Saturday condemning Iran.

Kuwait’s Foreign Ministry said the Iranian strikes represent «a dangerous undermining of endeavors for peace and stability, and a threat to the security and stability of the region.»

Both Kuwait and the UAE said they remain committed to supporting Bahrain’s safety and stability.

Advertisement
Marco rubio in Bahrain 2

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, center, attends a meeting with foreign ministers of the Gulf Cooperation Council member states in Manama, Bahrain, on Thursday, June 25, 2026. (Eric Lee/Pool Photo via AP)

US STRIKES IRAN AFTER STRAIT OF HORMUZ CARGO SHIP ATTACK AS CEASEFIRE TENSIONS ESCALATE

Also joining in the public denouncements of Iran were Saudi Arabia and Qatar, with both countries saying the latest strikes violate Bahrain’s sovereignty and international law.

Notably, Oman’s foreign ministry has not addressed the attack. Oman has maintained a neutral stance throughout the war and has frequently acted as a mediator between Washington and Tehran.

Advertisement

Oman and Iran are also still in the midst of negotiating a joint framework for the future administration of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.

Strait of Hormuz june 17

A container ship, right, and a cargo vessel are seen in the Strait of Hormuz off Bandar Abbas, Iran, Wednesday, June 17, 2026. (Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA via AP)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard took responsibility for the strikes on Bahrain, saying on state-run TV that it had targeted several locations «of the U.S. terrorist army in the region» without specifying which areas were hit, according to The Associated Press.

Advertisement

So far, no casualties or significant damage has been reported from the drone attack, which occurred days after Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Gulf allies in Bahrain.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement



war with iran, middle east, world, foreign affairs

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump unloads on ‘lunatic’ John Bolton after ex-aide pleads guilty in classified docs case

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump on Friday mocked former National Security Adviser John Bolton after his one-time aide admitted to mishandling a classified national defense document.

Advertisement

Bolton pleaded guilty hours earlier during a hearing in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, to one count of unauthorized possession of a national defense document. His guilty plea was part of a plea agreement that will see prosecutors dismiss the remaining 17 counts at sentencing. The guilty plea prompted an immediate response from Trump, who has repeatedly clashed with Bolton over foreign policy and the former adviser’s highly critical memoir ever since their very public falling out in 2019.

«John Bolton, a very dumb, unbalanced, and unskilled former representative of the United States of America, just pleads guilty!» Trump wrote in a Truth Social post late Friday. «He is a terrible person, a lunatic who only wanted to start trouble and wars, and who was a needless pusher of death and destruction wherever he went. Hopefully, he will be dealt with harshly!»

Bolton, 77, is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 28 and, under his plea agreement, faces a $2.25 million fine, up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release, up to 100 hours of community service and he will lose his federal retirement pension. His defense attorneys have said that they hope Bolton will avoid jail time.

Advertisement

EX-TRUMP OFFICIAL JOHN BOLTON PLEADS GUILTY TO 1 OF 18 COUNTS IN CLASSIFIED DOCS INDICTMENT

According to prosecutors, Bolton unlawfully kept classified national defense information after leaving government service, including documents classified as top secret. Authorities alleged he kept more than 1,000 pages of notes detailing his day-to-day activities as national security adviser and shared portions of that material with two family members using a personal email account.

Federal prosecutors said the documents included highly sensitive intelligence involving covert action programs, human intelligence sources and methods, and foreign military threats.

Advertisement

FBI Director Kash Patel said the investigation demonstrated that Bolton knowingly mishandled classified information.

FBI agents carry boxes out of former national security adviser John Bolton’s house in Bethesda, Md., on Aug. 22, 2025. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP Photo)

BOLTON CASE PACKED WITH ‘VERY DAMNING’ EVIDENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS, LEGAL EXPERTS WARN

Advertisement

«This FBI’s investigation proved that John Bolton knowingly transmitted top secret information using personal online accounts and retained said documents in his house – all in direct violation of federal law,» Patel said in a statement to Fox News Digital. «Despite an onslaught of false claims by the fake news stating this case was ‘retribution,’ this investigation was based on meticulous work from dedicated professionals at the FBI who followed the facts without fear or favor – and Bolton chose to admit his guilt and plead guilty.»

Bolton served as Trump’s national security adviser from April 2018 until September 2019. Trump has said he fired Bolton, while Bolton said that he resigned.

John Bolton exits vehicle arriving at Greenbelt Federal Courthouse in Maryland

Former Trump administration National Security Advisor John Bolton arrives for his arraignment at the Greenbelt Federal Courthouse in Greenbelt, Md., on Oct. 17, 2025. (Rod Lamkey Jr./AP)

Their relationship deteriorated further following the publication of Bolton’s 2020 memoir, «The Room Where It Happened,» which offered a highly critical account of Trump’s presidency. The Trump administration sought unsuccessfully to block the book’s publication, arguing it contained classified information. Bolton never faced any charges stemming from allegations that his memoir contained classified information.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Bolton’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, defended his client’s decision to plead guilty, saying it reflected accountability.

«He took responsibility for a mistake he made, thereby saving the government resources to pursue a case that could expose additional sensitive information,» Lowell said in a statement. «By contrast, President Trump thumbed his nose at the classified information laws, took actual classified documents to his Florida mansion, interfered with the investigation of that conduct, and has never accepted any accountability for his conduct. Ambassador Bolton, whose offense was only keeping a diary which contained classified information, kept a record to preserve history, but Donald Trump kept secrets to serve himself.»

Advertisement

william barr, national security, kash patel, donald trump, trials

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias