INTERNACIONAL
Soros-linked dark money network fuels Virginia redistricting push backed by national Democrats

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Virginians for Fair Elections, a main group fighting to get Virginia voters to approve a ballot referendum that will allow the state to redraw its congressional maps, has been pumped with millions in cash from a web of George Soros-backed dark money groups and top Democratic Party officials.
The money the group has garnered ahead of Tuesday’s vote, which is poised to allow Democrats in the House of Representatives to potentially take four seats from Republicans going into the midterms, also comes from leading Democratic Party figures and organizations like Nancy Pelosi and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).
Other left-wing juggernauts pumping money into the Democratic Party’s redistricting effort in Virginia include the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Eric Holder’s National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which once championed the adoption of «independent redistricting commissions,» national green energy group the League of Conservation Voters, and the U.S. House of Representatives campaign arm for the Democratic Party, according to a Fox News Digital review of state campaign finance records and records from the Virginia Public Access Project (VPAP), which tracks public spending in Virginia.
VIRGINIA DEMS ACCUSED OF ILLEGALLY ‘STEAMROLLING’ STATE LAW THAT COULD UPEND REDISTRICTING CRUSADE
«Dark money is flooding into Virginia,» GOP strategist Matt Gorman told Fox News Digital. «Democrats talked all about the cost of living during the campaign, but all they did once in office was raise taxes and rig elections. It’ll be the same elsewhere across the country in 2026 too.»
A woman casts her vote at a polling place in Burke, Fairfax County, Virginia, in 2026. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg)
Fox News Digital reported in March that the left-wing group fighting to redraw Virginia’s maps raised more than $38 million, according to VPAP’s donation totals based on state campaign finance records. As of right before the mid-April referendum vote, just a handful of weeks later, that total ballooned to more than $64 million.
In 2026, the largest giver to Virginians for Fair Elections was House Majority Forward, the nonprofit counterpart of House Democrats’ House Majority PAC, which has donated over $38 million, records show.
Meanwhile, entities directly tied to Soros, or that obtained significant funding which can be traced back to the billionaire Democrat megadonor, come in second and third in terms of total giving to the group, per VPAP’s accounting of donation totals.
One of those groups, the Fund for Policy Reform Inc, was founded by Soros. The other, titled The Fairness Project, has been funded by groups like the Sixteen Thirty Fund, Hopewell Fund and the Tides Foundation, which Soros has given significant funding to.

George Soros pictured on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 2020. (Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
DAVID MARCUS: DESPERATE DEMS TAP OBAMA TO PITCH VIRGINIA GERRYMANDERING LIES
Another one of the top donors to the left’s Virginians for Fair Elections is American Opportunity Action, described as «a pure pass-through entity» by Parker Thayer, a dark money expert from the conservative Capital Research Center. The group is so new that it does not even appear to have any 990s filed with the IRS but is still one of Virginians for Fair Elections’ top donors, according to VPAP and state campaign finance records.
Top Democratic Party members of Congress from outside Virginia, including Reps. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., and Katherine Clark, D-Mass., also donated tens-of-thousands of dollars, according to a review of state campaign finance records. Democratic Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine’s leadership PAC donated $100,000 as well, while the Democratic Party of Virginia put up just shy of a million dollars, per VPAP’s accounting.
Meanwhile, a group founded by Obama wingman Eric Holder, who previously championed «independent redistricting commissions,» provided a more than $10,000 in-kind contribution to the left-wing redistricting group, state election filings show. The League of Conservation Voters, and the Soros-backed MoveOn.org were also among Virginians for Fair Election’s top donors. In terms of labor union support, SEIU gave half-a-million, while AFT gave $100,000.
CBS HOST PRESSES FORMER AG ON DEFENDING PARTISAN REDISTRICTING EFFORTS IN VIRGINIA
Fox News Digital reached out to Soros’ Open Society Foundations and the other top donors pumping thousands or millions into the redistricting battle, but did not receive a response ahead of publication.
«No one wanted to take this action, but in a democracy, we can’t let entire states rig their congressional maps just to bend to the will of one person,» Alexis Magnan-Callaway, a spokesperson for The Fairness Project, told Fox News Digital in March.
«We have to respond. This amendment is a temporary, one-time exception that gives Virginia voters a voice and meets the needs of the current moment, while ensuring Virginia’s bipartisan redistricting process will resume after the 2030 census,» she continued. «This isn’t about favoring one party over another. This is about restoring fairness across the board by temporarily changing Virginia’s congressional districts.»
A main group in Virginia opposing the redistricting effort led by Democrats, Virginians For Fair Maps, raised a little over $3 million at the time of Fox News Digital’s late March report. However, the right-wing redistricting group in Virginia appears to have gained some ground since then as well, albeit still far behind the left’s Virginians for Fair Elections funding totals.
As of just before the referendum vote Tuesday, the anti-redistricting referendum group raised its fundraising total to nearly $20 million, with most of that money coming from a group by the same name that is also a significant donor to the Virginia Republican Party.
Other donations to the group come from a series of several much smaller donors, such as $50,000 from the National Shooting Sports Foundation and $100,000 from a wealthy D.C.-area real-estate investor, who donates primarily to GOP campaigns. That investor is the top individual donor at $100,000 out of just a handful of individual contributions, according to VPAP.

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin speaks during the Faith & Freedom Coalition’s Road to Majority Policy Conference at the Washington Hilton on June 22, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, a Republican, has reportedly given more than $500,000 in efforts against the redistricting measure, per reporting from the Virginia Scope. He also has been a leading voice in Virginia holding events to campaign against the measure despite no longer being in office.
Wealthy tech entrepreneur and Republican donor Peter Thiel has reportedly donated to Justice for Democracy PAC, which has been part of the anti-redistricting effort alongside Virginians for Fair Maps as well.
virginia, democratic party, george soros, banking finance, politics, state and local
INTERNACIONAL
House Freedom Caucus vows ‘gloves are coming off’ as FISA deadline looms

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Conservative House Republicans are escalating a fight over government surveillance as Congress reopens debate this week on a controversial warrantless spying program.
Members of the House Freedom Caucus are pledging to hold firm on adding a permanent ban on central bank digital currency (CBDC) to any legislation that reauthorizes Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). But the proposal faces widespread opposition from Senate Democrats and is viewed as dead on arrival in the upper chamber.
The cross-chamber standoff threatens to complicate Congress’ ability to meet a mid-June deadline to renew the spy law, which the Trump administration argues is a critical national security tool.
«If the Senate thinks they’re going to keep rolling over us, it’s just not going to happen,» Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said at a news conference in late April, referring to the Senate’s opposition to including a CBDC ban in a FISA renewal bill.
Rep. Andy Harris, chair of the Freedom Caucus, speaks to reporters alongside other members in the U.S. Capitol on March 27, 2026. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
SPEAKER JOHNSON ONE STEP CLOSER TO RENEWING CONTROVERSIAL SPY PROGRAM AFTER CONSERVATIVES FALL IN LINE
Both chambers in April approved a 45-day FISA extension to allow for more time for negotiations. House GOP privacy hawks objected to the short-term measure, citing its omission of a CBDC ban.
«CBDC can still make it across the finish line. Let’s just push on,» the Texas Republican added. «The Senate will respond to the people if they push hard enough. I’m positive on it.»
GOP privacy hawks argue a CBDC ban is a critical privacy guardrail against the Federal Reserve issuing a digital currency that could be used to surveil and potentially cut access to Americans’ financial transactions.
«They don’t want the government monitoring their bank accounts, telling them what they can buy, when they can buy it and when they’re not allowed to buy,» Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., said at a news conference, referring to his constituents’ concerns about a government-issued digital token.
The group has repeatedly sought to add a CBDC ban to various legislation over the past year, but has not yet been able to get a permanent ban on President Donald Trump’s desk.
During his confirmation hearing, Federal Reserve chair nominee Kevin Warsh said he would not issue a CBDC during his term, calling the proposal a «bad policy choice.»

Kevin Warsh, incoming chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, has called a government-issued digital currency a «bad policy choice.» (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
HOUSE GOP SLAMMED BY CONSERVATIVES FOR JOINING DEMS ON CONTROVERSIAL ‘KILL SWITCH’ AMENDMENT
The push to ban CBDCs is part of a broader effort by conservative Republicans to ramp up their fight against government surveillance.
«Americans don’t want Big Brother in their cars, their bank accounts, or their homes,» a spokesperson for the conservative House Freedom Caucus told Fox News Digital. «The gloves are coming off before FISA expires on June 12.»
Roy, the HFC’s policy chief, is pushing to repeal a Biden-era provision requiring a federal agency to draft a rule mandating impaired driver technology in new cars that could shut off vehicles if drunk driving is detected. The federal government has not yet moved forward with drafting the «kill switch» regulation.
«Do you really want to put that kind of data collection mandated inside every car? At what point is there just literally no privacy at all anywhere?» Roy said during a hearing in late April in support of adding a «kill switch» repeal amendment to FISA extension legislation.
GOP privacy hawks have also advocated for language that would add a judicial warrant requirement to the FISA renewal bill. While the law targets foreigners overseas using U.S. platforms, their communications with Americans can also be swept up and reviewed.
Privacy advocates in the Democratic Party have also long pushed for a warrant requirement to gather information on Americans.

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, has argued that a clean authorization of FISA Section 702 «is off the table» due to widespread opposition in Congress to extend the law without reforms. (Andrew Harnik/Getty)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The Trump administration initially sought a clean 18-month extension of the spy law, but quickly ran into problems with a mix of conservative and progressive privacy hawks.
«We’re not going to pass something that’s a long-term, clean reauthorization,» Roy said. «I think that’s been taken off the table. We’ve demonstrated that, and we’re going to get reforms.»
politics, congress, republicans, privacy
INTERNACIONAL
El gran deshielo oculto: cómo los canales secretos aceleran el peligro en la Antártida

Las plataformas de hielo de la Antártida almacenan la mayor reserva de agua dulce del planeta. Su destino puede definir cómo cambian los océanos y las costas en las próximas décadas.
Cuando estas plataformas pierden solidez y se adelgazan, dejan de frenar el avance del hielo continental al mar, lo que puede acelerar el aumento del nivel del mar a escala global.
Un equipo de científicos de Noruega, Australia, Finlandia y Reino Unido reveló que los canales ocultos bajo el hielo aceleran el derretimiento en zonas profundas. Ese proceso amenaza la solidez de estas estructuras colosales y su papel como barrera natural.

El hallazgo, que fue publicado en la revista Nature Communications mostró que esos canales pueden multiplicar por diez la velocidad de derretimiento en áreas específicas. Así, aumenta la vulnerabilidad de las plataformas y se facilita el traslado de hielo al océano.
Los investigadores pertenecen al Instituto Polar Noruego, la Universidad de Tasmania, el Centro Ártico de la Universidad de Laponia y la Universidad de Helsinki, que son instituciones reconocidas a nivel mundial por su trabajo en ciencias polares y cambio climático.

Los investigadores buscaron comprender cómo el derretimiento en la base de las plataformas de hielo afecta su estabilidad. El problema radica en que estas plataformas funcionan como freno natural para el avance del hielo hacia el mar.
El enfoque estuvo en los canales de base, que son surcos de varios kilómetros de ancho y cientos de metros de profundidad bajo el hielo. Estos canales modifican los patrones de derretimiento y la resistencia estructural de la plataforma.
Se buscó determinar si estos canales refuerzan el hielo o lo debilitan, creando zonas vulnerables. Además, los investigadores quisieron entender cómo la forma del fondo de hielo y la llegada de agua oceánica alteran el proceso.

El equipo utilizó simulaciones numéricas de alta resolución en la plataforma Fimbulisen, en la Antártida Oriental. Observaron cómo la circulación de agua y la topografía del fondo de hielo pueden atrapar agua cálida en los canales.
En el estudio, los investigadores afirmaron que la interacción entre la circulación y la topografía canalizada genera una circulación localizada que atrapa el agua cálida intrusa bajo el hielo. Este mecanismo incrementó las tasas de derretimiento en los canales.
Los modelos confrontaron escenarios con canales bien definidos y una base lisa, además de entradas de agua fría y de agua profunda, que tiene mayor temperatura. El derretimiento se multiplicó por diez en los canales donde ingresó agua cálida.

“Incluso intrusiones modestas de agua profunda circumpolar podrían tener implicancias importantes para la estabilidad de las plataformas de hielo frías de la Antártida”, declaró el equipo en el estudio al subrayar el alcance del fenómeno.
El crecimiento de los canales, causado por el derretimiento diferencial, debilitó las zonas más profundas de la plataforma y elevó el riesgo de fracturas. La velocidad de las corrientes y la forma del canal definieron los patrones de derretimiento.

“Descubrimos que la forma de la parte inferior de la plataforma de hielo no es solo una característica pasiva. Puede atrapar activamente el calor del océano exactamente en los lugares donde el derretimiento adicional es más importante”, explicó el científico principal Tore Hattermann, del Hub de Investigación iC3 Polar en Tromsø, Noruega.
La plataforma de hielo Fimbulisen se encuentra en la Antártida Oriental, una región más fría y que por eso suele considerarse menos amenazada que el resto del continente.
“Observamos bajo la plataforma de hielo Fimbulisen que incluso pequeñas cantidades de agua más cálida pueden incrementar sustancialmente el derretimiento dentro de los canales”, señaló.
“Como resultado, los canales pueden crecer y, en el peor de los casos, debilitar la estabilidad de toda la plataforma de hielo”, alertó.

Tras los resultados, los investigadores sugirieron incorporar la topografía detallada en los modelos climáticos para mejorar las proyecciones sobre el nivel del mar. No considerar estos procesos podría llevar a subestimar riesgos reales.
Igualmente reconocieron que faltan observaciones directas bajo el hielo y que los modelos trabajan con escenarios ideales. Subrayaron la necesidad de más mediciones en campo y tecnología avanzada.
En la conclusión, los científicos advirtieron: “Las plataformas de hielo con derretimiento bajo pueden ser más vulnerables a intrusiones moderadas de agua cálida de lo que se pensaba”. Observar tanto los grandes procesos como los detalles ocultos resulta clave para entender el destino de la Antártida y de los océanos.
Plataforma de hielo,Antártida,capa de hielo,aumento nivel del mar,cambio climático,océano Austral,hielo,polos,calentamiento global,ecosistema
INTERNACIONAL
Irán respondió a las propuestas de Estados Unidos aunque advirtió que la moderación llegó a su fin

INTERNACIONAL3 días ago«Una luz en el cielo»: el Pentágono publica nuevos archivos sobre ovnis y afirma que el público puede sacar sus propias conclusiones
ECONOMIA2 días agoEl dólar subió en la primera semana de mayo y se acercó a los 1.400 pesos
INTERNACIONAL3 días agoJack Smith escalates Trump DOJ clash with blistering private-event rebuke
















