INTERNACIONAL
Trump threatened to ‘blow up’ Oman — why the tiny Gulf kingdom is caught between DC and Iran
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump’s threat to «blow up» Oman if the Gulf kingdom didn’t «behave» has exposed a rare rupture with one of Washington’s most valuable Middle East partners — a country that has spent decades quietly serving as America’s backchannel to Iran.
«The strait’s gotta be open to everybody,» the president said during a Cabinet meeting Wednesday. «It’s international waters. Nobody’s going to control it. We’re going to watch over it. We’ll watch over it, but nobody’s going to control it. That’s part of the negotiation that we have. They would like to control it; nobody’s going to control it. It’s international waters. And Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow ‘em up. They understand that. They’ll be fine.»
The remark came amid a dispute over the future of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes. The Trump administration has strongly opposed reported discussions involving Iran and Oman over a potential tolling system or joint management arrangement for the strait, arguing such a move would threaten freedom of navigation and give Tehran greater influence over one of the world’s most important shipping routes.
The comments reflected a broader dispute over how far Oman should go in its efforts to engage Iran as the two countries discuss proposals related to the future management of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important shipping routes.
STRAIT OF HORMUZ TOLL WOULD SET ‘DANGEROUS PRECEDENT,’ UN SHIPPING AGENCY WARNS
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi meets Sultan of Oman Haitham bin Tariq Al Said at Al Baraka Palace in Muscat, Oman, April 26, 2026. (Oman News Agency/Handout via Reuters)
A drone view shows vessels anchored at the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, May 25, 2026. (Stringer TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY via Reuters)
The Omani embassy and the White House could not be reached for comment on the underlying tensions or negotiations on the Strait of Hormuz.
Situated on the southeastern edge of the Arabian Peninsula, Oman occupies the southern side of the Strait of Hormuz and has long pursued a foreign policy distinct from many of its Gulf neighbors.
While maintaining close security ties with the U.S., Muscat also has preserved relations with Iran, allowing it to serve as one of the region’s key intermediaries. Oman helped facilitate secret U.S.–Iran talks that paved the way for nuclear negotiations, has repeatedly served as a diplomatic channel between Washington and Tehran and has played a role in negotiations involving Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels.
«Oman’s role as the Switzerland of the Middle East has advanced U.S. interests,» April Alley, a senior fellow at The Washington Institute, told Fox News Digital.
«They have facilitated numerous rounds of talks between U.S. and Iranians,» she said. «They were also able to broker a truce between the US and the Houthis in the Red Sea. Their neutrality allows them to be quiet facilitators when adversaries are ready to talk.»
Oman’s value to Washington historically has stemmed from its ability to maintain communication channels with actors that many U.S. partners cannot or will not engage directly.
The Gulf kingdom has served as a go-between in negotiations involving the United States and Iran, supported diplomatic efforts related to Yemen and frequently positioned itself as a neutral intermediary during regional crises.
Yacoubian described that role as «indispensable» to previous diplomatic efforts.
«Oman has long played an important role as a quiet mediator, acting as a go-between for the United States and Iran in various negotiations including for the Obama-era JCPOA and more recently with the Trump administration and its efforts to negotiate with Iran prior to the 12-day war in June 2025,» she said.
President Donald Trump attends a cabinet meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 27, 2026. (Evan Vucci/Reuters)
A real dispute beneath the rhetoric
While Trump’s remarks drew attention, experts said they reflected a substantive disagreement over the future of the Strait of Hormuz rather than a purely rhetorical outburst.
«I think it was both,» Alley said when asked whether the remarks were simply an unusual threat directed at a longtime U.S. partner or reflected deeper concerns.
«Oman is an important defense partner, and the Trump administration has a record of working with them on mediation initiatives. The President has an unconventional style, but still this comment was shocking.»
«Beyond the shock value, I think it reflects clear frustration on the part of the administration with the Omani approach to the Strait,» she said. «The President is signaling that Oman has gone too far in discussions with Iran on options for opening the Strait that could give Iran administrative control and interfere with freedom of navigation.»
The administration’s concerns center on reports that Iran and Oman have discussed arrangements involving tolls, fees or joint administration of the strategic waterway.
«The administration is right to be concerned about tolls, fees, or joint management of the Strait,» Alley said. «All of these things are a recipe for Iran interfering with freedom of navigation in the long term and they could set a dangerous precedent for other international waterways.»
She warned that if Iran were able to exert administrative control over Hormuz, other Iran-backed groups could seek similar arrangements elsewhere.
«I could see the Houthis trying for the same in the Bab al-Mandeb,» she said.
Mona Yacoubian, senior adviser and director of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, similarly argued that any arrangement that financially benefits Iran through management of the strait would be cause for concern.
«If in fact under discussion, a joint management scheme that accrues monetary benefit to Iran, Oman, and possibly other GCC countries would be a justifiable cause for U.S. concern as this would undermine broader principles of freedom of navigation and set a worrying precedent globally,» she told Fox News Digital.
Yacoubian said Oman likely is attempting to serve as a bridge between Iran and Gulf Arab states amid concerns over future shipping disruptions in the strait.
«Oman is likely seeking to serve as a bridge between Iran and the Gulf Cooperation Council states,» she said.
But, Yacoubian added, «It is important to underscore that these types of threats are not well-received globally and contribute to an overall erosion of trust in the United States as a credible negotiator and leading global power.»
WHY GULF STATES AREN’T JOINING THE WAR AGAINST IRAN — DESPITE ATTACKS ON THEIR SOIL
Oman’s role has not been without controversy. Unlike many of its Gulf neighbors, Muscat has often sought to maintain relationships with rival regional powers even during periods of heightened tension.
Michael Rubin, a senior fellow at the Middle East Forum, argued that concerns about Muscat extend beyond the current dispute over the Strait of Hormuz.
«Oman often acts as Qatar-lite,» Rubin told Fox News Digital. «They like to mediate but, in the past at least, they appear to have turned blind eyes to terror finance and weapons smuggling.»
Rubin pointed to what he described as three longstanding concerns: alleged Iranian weapons smuggling through Oman to Yemen’s Houthi rebels, Oman’s hosting of Houthi leaders and what he characterized as financial incentives tied to disruptions in Red Sea shipping.
«It’s no secret that Oman has kind of chosen its own path, and sometimes split the difference between Iran and the rest of the Gulf in ways that have concerned U.S. policymakers,» Daniel Beinam, fellow of the Middle East Institute and former senior State Department official for Middle Eastern affairs, told Fox News Digital.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Even so, Beinam emphasized the depth of the relationship between the two countries.
«For a century and a half, Oman has been a close partner to the United States,» he said.
middle east, national security, donald trump, foreign policy, iran
Rep. Rich McCormick ‘worried’ by Iran deal: ‘I don’t trust them at all’
Rep. Rich McCormick, a Georgia Republican, weighs in on the evolving Iran nuclear talks, reiterating his strong distrust for the Iranian regime. He supports President Trump’s position, labeling the deal an «unconditional surrender» and highlighting concerns that billions in unfrozen assets could empower Iran’s military. McCormick emphasizes the regime’s history of hostility and calls for its change.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump’s new Iran framework is drawing warnings from nuclear experts who say the deal could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first locate, secure and verify the material.
The concern centers on language in the reported U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding (MOU) saying the two sides will resolve the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile through a still-to-be-negotiated process. The MOU identifies on-site «downblending,» which means diluting enriched uranium so it is less usable for a nuclear weapon, under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supervision as the minimum acceptable method for dealing with the material.
The MOU does not explicitly say Iran will retain a civilian nuclear program, but it says the two sides will discuss enrichment and other matters related to Iran’s «nuclear needs» in a final deal.
«Unfettered verification is everything,» Chuck DeVore, Chief National Initiatives Officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, told Fox News Digital. «There can be no denial for teams to inspect on the ground. Remote, technological means can achieve a lot, but nothing beats in-person inspections.»
TRUMP NUCLEAR TALKS FACE DEFINING QUESTION: WHAT HAPPENS TO IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE?
A composite image shows President Donald Trump alongside a missile launch with the Iranian flag in the background. Nuclear experts are warning that Trump’s reported Iran framework could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first fully account for and secure the material. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
The warnings from experts come as the MOU has already been signed, while planned follow-up talks in Switzerland aimed at launching technical negotiations were postponed Friday. The delay leaves key nuclear details unresolved as the agreement begins a 60-day window for negotiating a final deal.
IAEA supervision would only be meaningful if inspectors first regain enough access to fully account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and ensure Tehran does not retain unchecked control of the material, nuclear experts who spoke with Fox News Digital warned. Meanwhile, a recent IAEA report released this month underscored the agency’s limited visibility into Iran’s declared nuclear program after last year’s military strikes, saying that aside from a single inspection at an Iranian nuclear power plant, the agency «has not received information from Iran» about the status of its other declared nuclear facilities or associated nuclear material. «Nor has the Agency had access» to those sites for in-field verification, the report noted.
A senior administration official told Fox News Digital on background that the MOU required Iran’s regime to reaffirm that it will not procure or develop nuclear weapons, calling that a critical first step under Iran’s new Supreme Leader.
The official said the U.S. has reached understandings with Iran when it comes to its uranium stockpile, and the new deal is the first step of turning these understandings into real results, which include progress on enriched uranium stockpiles, dismantlement of nuclear sites, an enrichment ban and inspection access. The official added that the U.S. has already had productive discussions with Iran on those issues and, now that the MOU is formally in place, negotiators will work to make quick progress.
US-IRAN TALKS POSTPONED IN SWITZERLAND AMID ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH TENSIONS; HORMUZ REMAINS A KEY ISSUE
The official also referred Fox News Digital to comments Vice President JD Vance made Thursday, when he said the deal’s benefits depend on Iran following through on its promises.
«They have promised not to enrich. They have promised that they would allow inspectors in to destroy that highly enriched stockpile. And then, of course, it’s not usable anymore. You take it somewhere else,» Vance said. «They promised a number of things, and that’s why the deal contemplates a number of benefits if they do those things. But it doesn’t do anything if they don’t actually meet those promises.»
Vice President JD Vance listens as a reporter asks a question in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Thursday, June 18, 2026, in Washington. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
Andrea Stricker, deputy director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Nonproliferation Program, told Fox News Digital that any credible agreement must begin with recovering and safeguarding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, and not allowing Tehran to keep control of the material while it is diluted inside the country.
«Without verifiably dismantling and destroying all of Iran’s fundamental nuclear capabilities — nuclear material, facilities, centrifuges, manufacturing capabilities, equipment, documentation, and weaponization capacities, and ensuring scientists are redirected to civilian work — Iran’s pledge on paper is meaningless,» she told Fox News Digital, noting that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile could, if recovered and further enriched, provide enough weapons-grade material for roughly 22 nuclear weapons.
HOW DOES TRUMP SOLVE KEY ‘NUCLEAR DUST’ HANG-UP IN NEGOTIATIONS TO END IRAN WAR?
DeVore was more cautious about assigning a single number to Iran’s potential weapons capacity, saying the estimate depends heavily on the sophistication of the weapon design. He said the same stockpile could translate into fewer basic weapons or be stretched further by a more advanced nuclear program.
He said on-site downblending, if properly verified, would be aimed at making Iran’s roughly 1,000 pounds of 60% enriched uranium unavailable for further enrichment. DeVore cautioned that the material would still need additional processing to be turned into weapons-grade uranium and said he does not believe Tehran can currently do that because key facilities were destroyed in last year’s strikes.
A satellite image shows damage at the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran after U.S. strikes on June 22, 2025. (Maxar Technologies)
Asked what would be needed to make any Iran deal enforceable, DeVore told Fox News Digital the U.S. must avoid repeating what he described as a key weakness of the Obama-era nuclear deal: allowing Tehran to restrict access or keep certain sites off limits. He said the «ultimate question» is on-site verification, warning that Washington cannot allow itself to be pushed into «an agreement for agreement’s sake.»
TOP SENATE REPUBLICAN RIPS INTO TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL, SAYS $300B MAKES OBAMA DEAL LOOK LIKE ‘A PITTANCE’
DeVore also said the Obama-era JCPOA gave inspectors too much notice and too little freedom to inspect suspicious locations as well, arguing that any new deal must avoid a system where Iran can delay, limit or steer inspections before the IAEA gets on the ground.
The flag of Iran waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency headquarters in Vienna, Austria. (Florian Schroetter/AP Photo)
DeVore told Fox News Digital that his concern is informed by his experience as a young special assistant for foreign affairs in the Reagan administration, when he worked on verification issues surrounding Cold War-era nuclear agreements with the Soviet Union, including the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty and the Threshold Test Ban Treaty.
In those negotiations, DeVore said, the danger was that the minimum level of verification sought by defense and intelligence officials could become the starting point for diplomats, meaning the final deal could end up below what experts believed was necessary.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«Once you say, ‘This is the minimum we need,’ then that becomes the starting point, so anything agreed to is less than that,» DeVore said. «That’s what I fear.»
Fox News Digital reached out to the IAEA asking whether the agency can currently account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and whether it has any comment on the verification questions raised by the reported framework.
iran, nuclear proliferation, treaties, enforcement, sanctions, foreign policy, foreign affairs, middle east foreign policy
Algunos lectores seguro han desestimado el legado de Trump (también están, obviamente, quienes lo consideran absolutamente negativo). Sin embargo, sus ideas hoy son políticamente más relevantes que otra ideas y continúan influyendo en la práctica política contemporánea más que otras. Definitivamente el movimiento Trump defiende y sigue su enfoque, pero además el mismo no tiene más remedio que ser considerado por todos los demás actores a nivel internacional y la lógica de política interna de Estados Unidos hoy sigue discutiendo principalmente una agenda que pone en el día a día el Presidente de los Estados Unidos. Ya hemos analizado en columnas anteriores las principales características del sistema político de Trump por lo tanto no repetiré conceptos, pero sí decir que las leyes, las instituciones, la corrección política, los patrones establecidos por el establishment y los mismos principios, todo eso forma parte de la dinámica política que se pone en discusión con las acciones y declaraciones de las políticas de esta administración.
El análisis de esta conceptualizacion nos lleva a su parte más clara y concreta: la política de uso de la fuerza o amenaza del uso de la fuerza como la piedra angular metodológica para desarrollar las variables y objetivos de negociación. La acción de la administración ha afectado el mundo entero y definitivamente ha tenido un impacto fuerte en la región. Este es el primer aspecto que distingue las políticas de Trump de las concepciones anteriores del mundo y que deja una imagen absolutamente clara y ello es la necesidad de la acción, si es necesaria transformada en conflicto para resolver los problemas en algunos casos o para posicionar el interés de Estados Unidos en otros. En este contexto solo podemos comprender la actualidad desde una perspectiva respecto a la cual Trump cree que la historia debe tener un propósito específico principal que es reconocerlo. Eso no va a estar fácil, especialmente teniendo en cuenta la opinión pública prevalente y la situación de la “intelligentsia” actual, su retórica y la militancia que realiza de sus valores políticos. Las decisiones de la política Trump muestra que sus objetivos no necesariamente son un progreso inmediato hacia la libertad, la ciencia política no tendría que apelar a mayores profundidades analíticas y a distintas perspectivas en sus análisis para determinar que son lisa y llanamente intereses económicos los criterios que forman parte de su marco estructural de trabajo.
La generación permanente de “hechos Trump” establece la agenda política global. Los hechos demuestran persistentemente la militancia de una “intelligentsia” global que ha sido cerrilmente opositora pero cuya conexión con los “hechos Trump” en muchos casos ha sido distante y su capacidad de previsión ha sido relativamente nula. Es así que predijeron la inviabilidad del proyecto político de Trump en el 2015, pronosticaron su derrota en su primera participación electoral, decretaron su derrota en cada en cada debate presidencial, pronosticaron que cada denuncia significaba condena y prisión inminente, pronosticaron su derrota electoral nuevamente en la última elección, y obviamente han obviado sus resultados en las negociaciones con Panamá, Gaza, con Venezuela y la solución de las crisis humanitarias en el Darien y en la frontera sur, ahora en el caso del conflicto con Irán inmediatamente luego del anuncio del acuerdo aparecieron por lo menos tres versiones “fake” del acuerdo casi inmediatamente. Esto sin duda continuará. Se busca quizás hacer aparecer los acuerdos de la presidencia Obama como de alguna manera similares (o superiores) al acuerdo alcanzado ahora, pero por el punto no es ese, es la permisibilidad que se estructura o no bajo esos acuerdos o en paralelo a esos acuerdos, para que Irán enriqueciera su uranio. Creo que el cambio fundamental sería que esa permisibilidad no esté disponible y haya consecuencias si violan las restricciones para el enriquecimiento de uranio. El concepto por el cual los iraníes pueden firmar cualquier cosa e irrespetar cualquier cosa, de acordar primero y luego ver como no cumplen es que no se permitan esas violaciones, no debería seguir siendo tolerado, que no haya indulgencia con su mala fe. Cualquier acuerdo que se firme con Irán es susceptible de ser violado por Irán cuyos líderes no tienen que rendir cuentas terrenales por sus acciones criminales, violatorias y/o de mala fe. Por otra parte, en lo relativo al acuerdo preliminar con Irán, se deben de tener especialmente las fragilidades que tiene el mismo al no contemplar algunos intereses específicos de seguridad israelíes, que puede obligarlos a activar el uso de la fuerza para contrarrestar amenazas o agresiones.
Quizás resulta extraño para algunos que la libertad como concepto político y civil no haya formado parte de ningún objetivo o resultados de las acciones de la administración de EUA. La política exterior americana, que contiene las semillas de la libertad como marco conceptual, retórico y programático no ha formado parte de los resultados de sus acciones. La administración americana no ha aspirado a cambios de régimen que tantos fracasos costó a administraciones anteriores. Es así que sigue explorando nuevas fórmulas de asociación con los regímenes existentes. Las acciones de Trump marcan el retorno a la antigua democracia hemisférica americana, por la cual la determinación de la legitimidad pasa a estar legalmente reforzada por el apoyo y/o asociación con los Estados Unidos. Esto es muy probable que acarre disfuncionalidades varias en el futuro. La posición de la potencia como fuente de derecho, ser amigo de la misma implica estar legitimado. También la agenda temática global y regional ha cambiado con la apertura a la discusión de nuevos temas de forma recurrente, son temas que una agenda semi-woke internacional había eficientemente censurado. Por todo ello la evolución de la libertad individual es solamente parte sustancial del mundo de los negocios.
El idealismo que se introdujo para negociar el principio clave de la presión a través de la universalización de la justicia americana, la idea del conflicto como una unidad de fuerza y diplomacia. Además, el aspecto espiritual del individuo como en su máximo potencial. La lógica política estadounidense es un despliegue de todo, desde lo material, de lo tecnológico a la abstracción espiritual religiosa, no hay elemento que quede fuera del mensaje político ni de la justificación de las acciones. Los pasos están guiados por lo que podríamos llamar la educación de los asociados, reforzada por las relaciones diplomáticas que pasaron a contener consuetudinariamente por lo menos un viso de presión sobre ellos.
La diplomacia multilateral cuya agenda tiene notorios problemas para asumir la agenda política global o regional cayo en un período en el que se vive sin ofrecer al individuo el más alto nivel de garantías para su libertad, tanto social como espiritual o política y económica. Sin embargo, para alcanzar su funcionamiento pleno, la sociedad internacional se resintió en su propio dudoso sistema incapaz de soluciones y cuya autoridad moral había desaparecido.
En resumen, la diplomacia multilateral demostró una y otra vez la falta de tenacidad para asumir compromisos políticos ignorando las más básicas necesidades en la comunidad internacional. Por lo cual se terminó yendo por un proceso en el que la comunidad internacional terminó ignorando el multilateralismo. O apelando al multilateralismo para que los problemas no tuvieran solución, algo así como “si no querés resolver un problema nombra una comisión”. Es muy difícil justificar la idea de morir apegado a un sistema que no funciona y cuyo liderazgo hace lo imposible para que no funcione. A través de la lógica de estos procesos históricos, se dieron crimenes de lesa humanidad, violaciones sistemáticas de Derechos Humanos y corrupción rampante bajo la mirada pasiva o declaraciones, pero sin ninguna capacidad de aplicabilidad del derecho o de ejecutoriedad de la norma. Eso ha cambiado. Hoy algunos tiranos por lo menos se preocupan de que se les pueda aplicar el método “Nicolas Maduro”, que es llevárselos para darles residencia en el sistema penal americano o el método “niño Guerrero” o “Khamenei” que es simplemente un bombardeo con objetivo personal.
Cuantos de estos procesos implicaran una transición a la democracia en el futuro es difícil saberlo, consideramos oportuno en este momento subrayar el argumento político de que la promoción de la libertad y la democracia son partes necesarias del proceso histórico regional.
Luis Almagro/Instituto CASLA
Domestic,Politics,North America,Government / Politics
INTERNACIONAL
Man charged with attempted murder, released after allegedly forcing toddler into crocodile enclosure at zoo
Man FORCES child into crocodile enclosure
A British man has been arrested after allegedly forcing a 3-year-old boy into a crocodile enclosure at a zoo. The child suffered critical injuries, and authorities say the suspect did not know the boy as the investigation continues.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A man was released from custody on Friday after he was charged with attempted murder for allegedly forcing a 3-year-old boy into a crocodile enclosure at a zoo.
Cambridgeshire police said that the man, who remains unidentified, wasn’t fit to be interviewed.
The boy suffered critical injuries in the incident at Johnsons of Old Hurst, a farm and zoo in Huntingdon, England, north of London.
The 30-year-old man will remain on bail until Sept. 30, pending further inquiries.
GEORGIA MOM’S WALMART TRIP DEVOLVES INTO ‘TUG-OF-WARRING’ IN DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO SAVE HER SON
A crocodile rests inside an enclosure at Johnsons of Old Hurst, a farm and zoo in Old Hurst, Cambridgeshire, Britain, on April 14, 2026. (Dorota Dee Trajdos/Reuters)
«The man, who is not known to the victim, was assessed as not being fit for interview,» police said in a statement.
The boy is in stable condition, after reportedly suffering a broken arm and pelvis.
He was saved from the crocodile by Tracey Johnson, the wife of the zoo’s owner.
MOTHER JUMPS INTO WATER TO SAVE 4-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER WHO FELL BETWEEN CRUISE SHIP AND DOCK
«I know Tracey very well and she’s a lovely lady and it’s nothing more than I’d expect from her,» a local told BBC News. «She’d always put her own life at risk to save someone else. She’s an extraordinary lady and very brave.
The villager added that Johnson put herself in «immense danger» during the rescue.
The owners said their tropical house would remain closed until further notice.
Crocodiles rest inside an enclosure at Johnsons of Old Hurst farm and zoo in Old Hurst, Cambridgeshire, Britain, on April 14, 2026. (Dorota Dee Trajdos/Reuters)
«Our thoughts and prayers are with the boy and his family following the incident that occurred today,» the owners wrote on social media.
Johnsons of Old Hurst is a farm and zoo north of London in Huntingdon, England. (Google Maps)
Huntingdonshire district councillor Charlotte Lowe said she couldn’t «fathom how it’s happened because they’ve got all the right protection and safety equipment, for want of a better word, in there,» The Guardian reported.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox News Digital has reached out to the Cambridgeshire Constabulary for comment.
united kingdom, crime, crime world, travel, hunting, world, odd news
Harry Maguire sorprendió vendiendo figuritas en Nueva York tras quedar afuera de la lista de Inglaterra para el Mundial
El Gobierno ganó tiempo en el Congreso por el escándalo de Adorni y busca salvar la relación con los aliados
Declaró una testigo por la muerte de Agostina Vega, complicó a Barrelier y contó todo sobre la mamá: «Siempre fue una…»
Milei llega a Rosario con Adorni y la plana mayor libertaria: malabares en el protocolo para no cruzarse con Villarruel
Aranceles e impuestos: por que el precio de un auto importado se duplica ni bien desembarca en Argentina
Turquía vs. Paraguay: formaciones, hora y dónde ver por tv
Patricia Bullrich: “El Presidente considera que Adorni dio una explicación razonable”
El Gobierno envía señales de que Adorni tiene las horas contadas para evitar que sesione el Senado
La secuencia del golazo de Messi para Argentina ante Argelia en el debut en el Mundial 2026 y los récords que rompió
GOP Gov DeWine urges Ohio to abolish the death penalty, says it is no longer a deterrent
POLITICA3 días agoPatricia Bullrich: “El Presidente considera que Adorni dio una explicación razonable”
- POLITICA3 días ago
Decomisan un helicóptero producto del lavado de las coimas de Odebrecht
- POLITICA3 días ago
Maximiliano Abad habló sobre la situación de Manuel Adorni: “Hay unanimidad en que no debe seguir en el Gobierno”
