INTERNACIONAL
US won’t move troops despite ‘signed’ Iran deal, as doubts linger over Tehran’s next move

Iran deal could be ‘deadly’ for Israel, former Israeli ambassador argues
Former Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren discusses the Iran deal, warning its specific details could be «deadly» for Israel’s security. Oren notes the deal fails to address key goals like eliminating Iran’s nuclear program, ballistic missile system, and state-sponsored terror. He expresses «great concern» that the nuclear stockpile and control of the Strait of Hormuz remain unanswered questions.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Trump administration will keep its military buildup in the Middle East in place despite signing a new agreement with Iran, underscoring Washington’s continued distrust of Iran as the two sides enter a 60-day negotiating period.
«The plan is to keep the current force posture during the 60-day negotiations,» a senior U.S. official told reporters on a call Monday. «We hope to draw them down, but we’re not doing that yet.»
«The agreement contemplates the reduction of military forces in the region upon the agreement of a final deal,» the official added.
Officials said President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf already have signed the memorandum, and that the details of the agreement will be released publicly within the next 24 to 48 hours. A formal signing ceremony is expected later in the week.
The Trump administration will keep its military buildup in the Middle East in place despite signing a new agreement with Iran, underscoring Washington’s continued distrust of Tehran as the two sides enter a 60-day negotiating period. (Mandel Ngan/AFP)
BUILT FOR WEEKS OF WAR: INSIDE THE FIREPOWER THE US HAS POSITIONED IN THE MIDDLE EAST
The decision means the Pentagon will maintain a military posture that recently included roughly 50,000 troops deployed across the Middle East, one of the largest U.S. force concentrations in the region in more than two decades. Publicly available fleet tracking data indicate at least two carrier strike groups remain in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility.
Officials repeatedly stressed that any sanctions relief, asset releases or future concessions would be tied to verification and Iranian performance, not promises alone, with one senior official acknowledging the two sides remain in the early stages of «building trust.»
That lack of trust was evident in the administration’s description of the agreement, which differs in key respects from accounts published by Iranian officials and state-linked media.
VANCE SAYS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S KEY OBJECTIVES HAVE BEEN REACHED IN US-IRAN DEAL
White House officials insisted Monday that no frozen Iranian assets have been released and said any sanctions relief would be conditioned on Iranian performance during the upcoming negotiations.

Officials said President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, pictured above, have already signed the memorandum with Iran. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)

Officials said President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf have already signed the memorandum. (Ting Shen/AFP via Getty Images)
«The very simple fact is, $0 of unfrozen assets have been released by the United States or any other country,» one official said.
Iranian officials and state-linked media, meanwhile, have described the framework as paving the way for the release of roughly $24 billion in frozen Iranian funds and broader economic relief during the negotiation period.
White House officials disputed reports that any funds have already been released and repeatedly emphasized that future economic concessions would be earned through compliance rather than granted upfront.
IRAN’S REGIME SPINS NUCLEAR AND STRAIT OF HORMUZ DEAL WITH TRUMP AS VICTORY OVER US, ISRAEL
«We’ll do some small gestures of that in the beginning, if they make some small gestures to us,» an official said.
While Trump has portrayed the agreement as a potential turning point in U.S.–Iran relations, the memorandum itself is narrower in scope. The framework extends the ceasefire, establishes a 60-day negotiating window and seeks to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments normally pass.
The reopening of the Strait may prove to be the agreement’s most immediate and economically significant effect. White House officials said the memorandum provides for the opening of the waterway and the lifting of the naval blockade, though they cautioned that commercial shipping could take days or weeks to return to normal levels as mines are cleared and shipping companies regain confidence in the route.
Officials also said the agreement requires the Strait to remain open toll-free during the 60-day negotiating period. The administration expects shipping traffic to increase significantly over the coming days, easing pressure on global energy markets.
The deal, officials said, creates a framework under which Iran could eventually receive sanctions relief and broader access to the global economy in exchange for verifiable steps to ensure it does not rebuild its nuclear program and curbs support for terrorism and regional instability.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«If they’re willing to behave like a normal country, then we’re willing to treat them like a normal country,» one official said.
The prospect of renewed traffic through the Strait has already reverberated through global markets. Oil prices fell following news of the agreement as traders bet that one of the world’s most important energy choke points could soon return to normal operations.
war with iran, middle east foreign policy, pentagon, treaties, iran, sanctions
INTERNACIONAL
El acuerdo entre Estados Unidos e Irán: incluso si reabre el estrecho de Ormuz, el petróleo tardaría semanas o meses en fluir plenamente

INTERNACIONAL
Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers scramble as FISA fight comes at the worst possible time

Lawmakers sound alarm as FISA spy law expires
Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on Congress failing to reach a deal on FISA Section 702, sparking warnings from lawmakers about national security vulnerabilities, on ‘Fox Report.’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
There’s the World Cup. America’s 250th birthday. And the conflict with Iran.
It’s all a nightmare national security hat trick.
«It’s the highest we’ve ever seen,» said Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin on Fox News Sunday about the terrorism threat level. «When I say we arrest terrorists every single week, I’m not exaggerating. Those aren’t the individuals that are coming across our border, those are individuals that are still inside this country.»
But lawmakers are scared now that the nation’s premier anti-terrorism tool — called FISA Section 702 — expired over the weekend.
EXPIRING SPY LAW SPARKS WARNINGS OF ‘FATAL’ CONSEQUENCES AHEAD OF WORLD CUP
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin testifies before the House Committee on Homeland Security during a hearing on the Fiscal 2027 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security, in Washington, Wednesday, June 3, 2026. (Cliff Owen)
«I hope and pray to God that nothing happens in this country where an American is killed,» said Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio.
«We want to prevent the next 9/11 from happening,» said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., on Fox.
«This program goes dark at a time when there are literally hundreds of thousands of people coming to this country for the World Cup,» said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D.
Well, not quite.
«FISA is operative until next March. That’s the legislation,» said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Confused? You’re not the only one. Let me explain.
SPY PROGRAM CREDITED WITH STOPPING TAYLOR SWIFT TERROR PLOT BARRELS TOWARD EXPIRATION

Sen. Jack Reed listens as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell testifies at a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on the Fed’s semiannual monetary policy report on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on March 3, 2022. (Tom Williams-Pool/Getty Images)
Legal authority sanctioned by Congress for this powerful intelligence-gathering weapon to foil terrorism expired at 11:59:59 p.m. ET Friday night. If nearly any other statute other than FISA Section 702 expired, the government couldn’t continue to rely on the program.
«It’s a very inopportune time to allow the authorizing statute for 702 to lapse,» conceded George Croner, a former National Security Agency counsel. «It has proven to be the most useful by far of any of the intelligence programs that the community has available to it.»
That’s why there’s worry about unprecedented vulnerabilities with the program expiring. Especially right now.
«I think that it’s completely irresponsible to have FISA go dark at the beginning of the World Cup,» said Rep. Carlos Gimenez, R-Fla., on FOX Business.
A bipartisan coalition tanked an emergency FISA extension in both bodies of Congress last week.
«It should have been voted down,» said Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo. «And I don’t say that lightly.»
«We don’t have the guts to fix it. And I’m tired of hearing people are going to die,» said Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., scoffing at potential consequences from a program which ran its statutory course.
The House rejected a three-week patch to paper over an imminent lapse in the program on Thursday.
«Anybody who votes no on this bill is voting to undermine America’s national security,» said House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La.
CONSERVATIVE FISA REVOLT POSES FRESH TEST FOR SPEAKER JOHNSON

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, joined by House Majority Whip Tom Emmer and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, holds a news conference after a House Republican Conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 13, 2026. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
But the GOP House majority failed to muster even 200 yeas for the bill. Nineteen Republicans bolted. They have privacy concerns and raised questions about illegal searches and seizures.
«The Fourth Amendment is not a suggestion. We have to have a warrant,» said Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas.
Still, Republican leaders claimed that it was Democratic resistance which put the country at risk.
«(Democrats) are willing to jeopardize the safety and the security of the American people to make a cheap political point,» said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.
But there was a reason Democrats balked.
Congress punted renewing FISA Section 702 on multiple occasions over the past few months, repeatedly approving stopgap measures. Finally, Democrats and Republicans painstakingly negotiated a compromise which would install reforms. But Democrats withdrew their support for the deal once President Trump announced that housing czar Bill Pulte would take over on a temporary basis for Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
Democrats noted that Pulte lacked any national security or intelligence experience. Moreover, they believed he could weaponize intelligence programs like Section 702 against political opponents.
TULSI GABBARD CHANGES TUNE ON CONTROVERSIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOL FOLLOWING GOP LOBBYING

Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency Bill Pulte walks outside the White House, Sept. 2, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
Ironically, both sides thought this was ironed out before Memorial Day. But Senate Democrats pulled their votes to advance the FISA measure in a pre-dawn vote late last month.
Still, there’s concern about the consequences of not having FISA Section 702 fully in place.
«Do Democrats not sleep at night if, God forbid, there’s something that happens with FISA turned off?» yours truly asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.
«Donald Trump should lose sleep,» countered Jeffries. «Because Donald Trump decided he wants to elevate Bill Pulte, who is nothing more than a malignant political hack.»
Here’s how the program works:
FISA siphons the calls, emails and texts of foreign intelligence targets that the U.S. tracks. A special, secret court oversees FISA. But it ruled that the intelligence services can still track suspect communications through well into 2026 – despite a break in the law.
«Data can still be collected for a year after it expires. So I don’t think it’s as dire as some think it is,» said Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.
She’s not the only one.
«(FISA) will not lapse. I try to make this clear. The statute makes it clear that the authorities of FISA are going to be positive and enforceable for the remainder of this year. We think, until March of next year,» said Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill.
TRUMP SIGNS STOPGAP FISA EXTENSION AFTER SENATE BLOCKS LONG-TERM RENEWAL

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., speaks during a hearing on Capitol Hill to examine the abduction of Ukrainian children by the Russian Federation on Dec. 3, 2025. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post)
However, it’s unclear if telecommunications companies will provide digital breadcrumbs to the government, lacking a Congressional safeguard.
«That is a gray area and it’s one of the things that we’re going to have to work through,» said Jeffries.
Croner, the former NSA counsel, says people shouldn’t worry about the government lacking a FISA Section 702 law. But he offered a caveat.
«The carriers are going to become, in my view, increasingly uncomfortable with not having statutory protection for their part in 702 collection,» said Croner.
When reporting on Congress, you’re only as good as your sources. And the same can be said in spy craft. The government’s digital spooks can’t track possible terrorists if the telecom data vanishes.
It was believed a path emerged to re-up FISA late last week. Just as the Senate departed for the week, the President nominated Jay Clayton as the permanent DNI. Clayton’s confirmation hearing is Wednesday before the Senate Intelligence Committee. It’s possible the Senate could step on the gas and try to confirm Clayton on the floor as early as this week. That could clear the path to reauthorize FISA.
«The only factor was Bill Pulte,» said Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., about Democrats dropping their support for a FISA renewal. «And that factor is now, I think, set on the sideline. It should pave the way.»
Republicans will likely vote to confirm Clayton. But Democrats aren’t so sure.
«We have to look very clearly at Jay Clayton,» said Reed. «He’s a very accomplished lawyer. But the statute requires someone taking this job to have significant national security experience. That has to be measured. I don’t think he does.»
So the Senate may confirm Clayton. But does that guarantee passage of FISA? Not necessarily. President Trump altered the playing field again over the weekend.
He’s now demanding that lawmakers connect an extension of FISA Section 702 to the SAVE America Act. That bill is the touchstone of the President’s 2026 agenda. It requires proof of citizenship to vote. While popular among Republicans, the SAVE America Act didn’t even command a simple majority on two test votes in the Senate this spring.
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: TRUMP’S SAVE ACT ULTIMATUM RUNS INTO SENATE REALITY

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, speaks at a «Only Citizens Vote» bus tour rally supporting the SAVE Act at Upper Senate Park outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 10, 2025. (Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)
A mix of Democrats and Republicans are necessary to pass FISA. There’s too much internal GOP opposition. Latching the SAVE America Act to FISA Section 702 is a poison pill to Democrats. The measure would never command 60 votes and break a filibuster in the Senate.
So where does this land?
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
As Croner suggests, things are likely OK for now, despite the threats. However, a long statuary breach for FISA isn’t good.
You’re only as good as your sources in journalism. And perhaps to prevent a terrorist attack, you’re only as good as the law.
congress, homeland security, national security, counter terrorism, senate elections, politics
INTERNACIONAL
Hombre asesina a su expareja en Panamá, a pesar de mediar una orden de alejamiento

La tragedia llegó este lunes en horas del mediodía a la provincia de Chiriquí, fronteriza con Costa Rica, cuando un hombre de aproximadamente 45 años se presentó, arma blanca en mano, a un restaurante donde se encontraba su supuesta expareja, a quien le causó la muerte.
La víctima falleció en el lugar de los hechos al recibir una herida provocada con un arma punzocortante, elevando hasta el momento a 3 los femicidios en la provincia de Chiriquí y a 11 en el país.
Agentes de la Policía Nacional, en coordinación con el Ministerio Público, aprehendieron al sujeto, quien fue puesto a disposición de las autoridades correspondientes para las investigaciones respectivas.
Este lunes las autoridades judiciales también aprehendieron a un sospechoso de femicidio y tentativa de homicidio, por un hecho ocurrido el pasado 7 de junio en el sector de Cerro Cocobolo, distrito de San Miguelito, donde una mujer perdió la vida y otra fue herida.
La aprehensión se efectuó mediante diligencia de allanamiento en el corregimiento Arnulfo Arias, ubicando a este hombre requerido por este caso, siendo trasladados para los trámites correspondientes.

De acuerdo con la Policía, el sospechoso mantiene antecedentes penales por casos de robo agravado, riña, violencia doméstica, posesión de drogas y agresión verbal.
Según el Centro de Estadísticas del Ministerio Público, del 1 de enero y al 31 de mayo de este año se han registrado 10 víctimas de femicidio, 12 tentativas de femicidio y 6 muertes violentas de mujeres, clasificación que se refiere a todos los homicidios de personas del sexo femenino que no fueron consideradas como femicidios, según valoración del Fiscal del caso y la aplicación de la ley vigente.
Las cifras representan un aumento importante frente al mismo período de 2025. El informe señala que los femicidios al 31 de mayo pasaron de 7 casos a 10, lo que equivale a un incremento de 43%, mientras que las tentativas de femicidio aumentaron de 9 a 12 víctimas, un crecimiento de 33%. Mientras, las muertes violentas de mujeres disminuyeron de 7 a 3 casos, -14%.
Para que en Panamá exista un femicidio este debe partir de la definición penal vigente, por ejemplo, la exigencia de que exista una relación de pareja o ex pareja, o que se acrediten determinadas circunstancias de género, y tener en cuenta que no todas las muertes violentas de mujeres se clasifican de inmediato como femicidios.
Algunas pueden aparecer inicialmente como homicidios dolosos, lesiones personales con resultado de muerte u otros delitos, para luego ser reclasificadas en etapas avanzadas de la investigación.

En la mayoría de los casos, el agresor es una pareja o expareja, lo que sitúa el femicidio íntimo como la forma predominante de violencia letal contra las mujeres.
Esta realidad refuerza la idea de que el espacio doméstico, lejos de ser un lugar seguro, puede convertirse en el escenario de las más graves vulneraciones de derechos.
En algunos casos, el femicidio se comete en presencia de menores de edad o dentro del hogar compartido, lo que agrava el trauma y las consecuencias para la familia.
También existen femicidios no íntimos, en los que el agresor es un conocido, un vecino, un desconocido o un miembro de redes criminales.
Estos casos pueden estar vinculados a otras formas de violencia como la trata de personas, la explotación sexual, las actividades delictivas o conflictos comunitarios.

En Panamá los casos que llegan a los medios de comunicación suelen incluir narrativas de mujeres que habían anunciado su intención de terminar la relación o que ya se habían separado, pero seguían siendo acosadas y amenazadas por sus exparejas.
femicidio,homicidio,crimen,violencia de género,justicia,escena del crimen,rosa,contorno,víctima,derechos humanos
POLITICA2 días agoLa polémica por las criptomonedas de Adorni: cómo funciona la trazabilidad y qué puede revelar una billetera
POLITICA2 días agoTras las explicaciones de Adorni, el PRO y la UCR se distancian del oficialismo y cruje el apoyo legislativo
DEPORTE1 día agoGaspi, reconocido streamer argentino, falleció en un accidente aéreo en Brasil




















