Ucrania lanzó el domingo una de las mayores ofensivas con drones de las últimas semanas contra territorio ruso, con el puerto báltico de Primorsk como objetivo central. Los ataques dejaron un incendio en el terminal de exportación de crudo, alcanzaron un navío militar de la clase Karakurt, una lancha patrullera y un petrolero en el Báltico, y se extendieron a otras regiones del país, dejando al menos tres muertos y varios heridos. El presidente ucraniano, Volodymyr Zelensky, calificó la operación de exitosa y aseguró que causó daños significativos a la infraestructura portuaria.

El gobernador de la región de Leningrado, Alexander Drozdenko, confirmó que más de 60 drones fueron derribados durante la noche. Según su versión, el incendio fue extinguido con rapidez y no se registró derrame de petróleo. Zelensky describió en Telegram la destrucción de instalaciones del puerto y aseguró que la flota en la sombra también recibió golpes frente a Novorossiysk, el principal terminal exportador ruso en el mar Negro. “Estos petroleros eran utilizados activamente para transportar petróleo. Ya no”, escribió el mandatario.

Primorsk opera como terminal principal de Transneft para el envío de crudo al exterior, con capacidad para un millón de barriles diarios. Ya había sido atacado en varias ocasiones desde marzo. Según datos de Bloomberg, los ataques combinados a Primorsk y al puerto de Ust-Luga provocaron en la semana del 22 al 29 de marzo una caída del 43% en las exportaciones rusas de petróleo, con un coste estimado de más de 970 millones de dólares en ingresos perdidos para Moscú en solo siete días.

El ataque del domingo no es un hecho aislado. Primorsk fue golpeado al menos en tres ocasiones desde finales de marzo, en una campaña de hostigamiento sistemático diseñada para impedir las reparaciones antes de que el terminal recupere capacidad operativa. Según el Atlantic Council, los ataques ucranianos de 2026 han dejado de ser esporádicos para convertirse en oleadas coordinadas y repetidas sobre los mismos objetivos de alto valor. El propio Kremlin admitió que su defensa antiaérea no puede proteger “al cien por cien” la infraestructura crítica, una concesión inusual que revela la magnitud del problema.

El objetivo estratégico de la campaña ucraniana es privar al Kremlin de los ingresos extraordinarios que le ha generado la guerra en Medio Oriente. El conflicto entre Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán disparó el precio del crudo por encima de los 110 dólares por barril. El portavoz del Kremlin, Dmitri Peskov, reconoció el domingo que nuevas interrupciones podrían elevar aún más los precios, y sostuvo que menores volúmenes compensados por cotizaciones más altas seguirían siendo rentables para el Estado. Los analistas del Carnegie Endowment for International Peace han matizado esa ecuación: el crudo no exportado ahora podría llegar al mercado cuando los precios ya hayan bajado, convirtiendo la interrupción temporal en pérdida real.

El domingo, los ataques se extendieron a otras regiones. En Belgorod, un dron alcanzó un automóvil y mató a un hombre de 21 años y a su padre. En la región de Moscú murió el sábado un hombre de 77 años, y el alcalde Sergei Sobyanin confirmó que cuatro aparatos fueron derribados antes de llegar a la capital. En Smolensk, tres personas, entre ellas un niño, resultaron heridas cuando un dron impactó en un bloque de apartamentos.

En el frente terrestre, las fuerzas rusas avanzaban hacia Kostiantynivka, en el este de Donetsk. Las negociaciones de paz mediadas por Washington permanecen bloqueadas: las tres rondas celebradas este año en Abu Dabi y Ginebra no produjeron avances, en parte porque el conflicto con Irán ha desviado la atención de la Casa Blanca. La UE aprobó el 23 de abril su vigésimo paquete de sanciones, que eleva a 632 el número de buques rusos con prohibición de acceso a puertos europeos. La combinación de ataques directos, sanciones internacionales y golpes a la flota en la sombra configura una presión acumulada sobre las exportaciones energéticas rusas que Kyiv no tiene intención de aflojar.

Power the Future, a pro-energy advocacy group, is asking Congress to take a closer look at opposition to data centers springing up across the country.

In a letter to Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., the group asked lawmakers to open formal investigations into millions of dollars in funding they believe is incentivizing nonprofits and local groups to take up an environmental stance against data centers.

In their view, it’s a movement that’s trying to look more grassroots than it actually is.

«We request that your committees open a formal investigation into a coordinated, billionaire-funded, and potentially foreign-backed political campaign designed to block the construction of data center and AI infrastructure across the United States, which sits among the most important economic and national-security buildouts of President Trump’s second term,» the letter reads.

FOREIGN BILLIONAIRES FUNNEL $2.6B TO US ADVOCACY GROUPS TO INFLUENCE POLICY, WATCHDOG REPORT CLAIMS

The letter highlights fears that American laws surrounding nonprofits, which shield donors from public disclosures, could be enabling wealthy ideologues to make donations that are difficult to track.

The group pointed to environmentally-minded nonprofits like the Sierra Club, Food and Water Watch, Earthjustice, Goods Jobs First, Piedmont Environmental Council, the Southern Environmental Law Center, MediaJustice and the Athena Coalition that have received — and spent millions — opposing their expansion.

New Venture Fund, the Sierra Club Foundation and the Sixteen Thirty Fund collectively received over $13 million from pro-environmental donors, according to grant reporting.

It’s unclear if those donations were made for the express intent of opposing data center constructions.

Even so, across the board, the groups affirm that data centers are costing more resources than they are worth at the expense of local communities’ environmental well-being.

Power the Future disagrees.

RAPID RISE OF AI PUTS NEW URGENCY ON CONGRESS TO UNLEASH AMERICAN ENERGY

The Douglas County Google Data Center in Lithia Springs, Ga., March 6, 2026. (Mike Stewart/AP)

Beyond generating tax revenue for communities and creating employment opportunities, Power the Future argued that the data centers enable the U.S. to stay competitive with foreign powers.

«Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has called opposition to that buildout a ‘surrender’ to China,» Power the Future wrote in its data center report.

«The compute infrastructure that trains AI models, processes intelligence data and powers the next generation of American economic and military advantage has to be built somewhere.»

Although the group’s founder, Daniel Turner, believes that part of the opposition may well come from legitimate local concerns about unwanted development in rural areas, he’s skeptical of the money being pumped into the picture.

‘BAD IDEA’: CONSERVATIVES WARN RED STATE DATA CENTER BILL WILL DERAIL TRUMP’S VISION OF ENERGY ‘GOLDEN AGE’

Racks of servers with colorful wires at a data center as AI expansion strains the power grid, prompting a proposal for tech firms to fund their own energy needs. (Sameer Al-Doumy/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

«There is certainly a lot for communities to discuss around data centers. But is it a paid operation by radical green groups who see banning data centers as the new banning the gas stove or banning the leaf blower?» Turner said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

Power the Future has found 188 local opposition groups across 24 states that oppose data center expansion, according to its research.

A surge in Somali piracy is fueling fears of a Red Sea «security vacuum» across the region as analysts warn of a revived maritime crime playbook, now linked to Iran-backed Houthis.

The warning follows a May 2 report from Yemen’s coast guard that armed men hijacked an oil tanker off Shabwa and steered it toward the Gulf of Aden, and the vessel has since been located with recovery efforts underway, Reuters reported.

«There is a fundamental shift in the maritime center of gravity amid a new phase of maritime instability in the region,» Ido Shalev, chief operating officer at RTCOM Defense, told Fox News Digital.

«Somali and Houthi-linked groups are teaming up — using skiffs and new tech to strike ships with coordination not seen in a decade — while Saudi crude rerouted from the Strait of Hormuz has created a ‘target-rich environment for them,’» he added.

COULD SOMALILAND BASE EMERGE AS US FOOTHOLD AGAINST IRAN, HOUTHIS IN KEY SEA LANES?

«There is an opportunistic alignment, with the Houthis providing geopolitical cover and advanced GPS and surveillance, and Somali groups providing the boots on the ground or skiffs on the water,» Shalev said.

With the MT Eureka taken off Shabwa, Shalev, a former Israeli naval officer, suggested what he called the «Somali model» had returned «with a vengeance.»

«This is a transactional collaboration, and in the exact area where the Houthis are active and would like to cause damage and support their IRGC sponsor,» he said before describing how pirates would hijack the entire ship and cargo, taking them to a secure anchorage «like Qandala or Garacad.»

«They then demand a ransom for the entire package: the vessel, the tens of millions of dollars in oil, and the crew,» he said.

TRUMP HALTS MILITARY STRIKES ON HOUTHIS BUT EXPERT WARNS IRAN-BACKED TERRORIST GROUP REMAINS MAJOR THREAT

Somali and Houthi-linked groups are teaming up using skiffs and new tech to strike ships with coordination not seen in a decade. (Jason R. Zalasky/U.S. Navy via Getty Images)

The surge in regional risk is also exacerbated, Shalev said, by the volatility of the Strait of Hormuz. As Iranian-backed threats persist in the Persian Gulf, global energy flows are shifting.

«Due to the closure and instability of the Strait of Hormuz, Saudi Arabia has diverted millions of barrels of crude per day through its East-West pipeline to the Red Sea port of Yanbu,» the former Israeli naval officer said.

«This creates a target-rich environment in a sector that was previously a backbound route. With Brent Crude prices surging — peaking near $115/bbl this quarter — the prize for a successful hijacking has never been higher.»

The risk level in waters off Somalia was recently upgraded to «substantial» following a wave of hijackings and attempted attacks that began April 21, according to Windward AI and alerts from the U.K. Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO).

At least three vessels were hijacked within days: a Somali-flagged fishing boat on April 21, followed by the Palau-flagged tanker Honour 25 (IMO 1099735), and, by April 26, a general cargo ship seized and redirected to Garacad.

ISRAEL’S NAVY HITS HOUTHIS IN YEMEN IN ‘UNIQUE’ STRIKE AFTER TRUMP PROMISES END TO US OPS

The surge in regional piracy risk is exacerbated by the volatility of the Strait of Hormuz as Iranian-backed threats persist in the Persian Gulf and global energy flows are shifting. (Mass Communications Specialist 1st Class Cassandra Thompson/U.S. Navy via Getty Images)

Shalev, who served as the lead architect for Nigeria’s «Falcon Eye» project — a surveillance system that successfully reduced piracy in those waters to 0% — warned that the distraction of global warships is being exploited.

«Because international naval forces are preoccupied with missile threats, a ‘security vacuum’ has now opened in the region, so pirates can travel vast distances in skiffs to board vulnerable commercial vessels,» he said.

«Somali piracy, which had been suppressed for years, has seen this sharp resurgence that also correlates perfectly with the Houthi crisis in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden,» Shalev said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Red Sea carries 12% to 15% of global trade and about 30% of container traffic, moving over $1 trillion in goods annually, including oil and LNG, according to reports.

«The current crisis proves that you cannot ‘patrol’ your way out of this; you have to see the threat before it ever reaches the ship,» Shalev said.