INTERNACIONAL
Israel descartó el fin de la guerra contra Irán y advirtió sobre una respuesta “severa” ante nuevos ataques

El ministro de Defensa israelí, Israel Katz, afirmó este miércoles que la confrontación militar con Irán está lejos de haber concluido y sostuvo que las fuerzas de su país mantienen plena capacidad para lanzar nuevas operaciones contra objetivos iraníes en caso de que se registren ataques contra el Estado hebreo.
Durante una ceremonia oficial de reconocimiento organizada por el Ministerio de Defensa, Katz se refirió a la reciente escalada regional y envió un mensaje de advertencia a Teherán.
“No debemos pensar que el trabajo está terminado. La campaña contra Irán está lejos de haber terminado”, declaró el funcionario ante los asistentes.
Sus palabras llegan después de varios días de tensión en Medio Oriente marcados por intercambios de ataques, amenazas cruzadas y movimientos militares en distintos frentes de la región. Aunque en las últimas horas no se registraron enfrentamientos de gran magnitud entre ambos países, las autoridades israelíes insisten en que la situación sigue siendo inestable.
Katz señaló que Israel responderá con dureza ante cualquier nueva acción militar iraní.
“Si Irán ataca a Israel, sufrirá un golpe severo, como el que le infligimos hace unos días”, afirmó. También aseguró que las Fuerzas de Defensa de Israel “están preparadas para atacar con gran fuerza en Irán” si las circunstancias lo requieren.
Las declaraciones reflejan la postura del gobierno israelí de mantener la presión sobre la República Islámica tras la reciente crisis entre ambos países. Si bien existieron versiones sobre la posible cancelación de una operación militar de gran escala contra territorio iraní, Katz dejó en claro que las capacidades ofensivas israelíes continúan disponibles y que la conducción política no considera cerrado el episodio.
El ministro también dedicó parte de su discurso a la situación en el Líbano, donde Israel mantiene operaciones contra Hezbollah. Según explicó, las fuerzas israelíes llevaron a cabo acciones contra integrantes de la organización terrorista en la ciudad costera de Tiro, en el sur libanés.
Katz aseguró que las operaciones permitieron actuar contra miembros de Hezbollah que operaban en un barrio de mayoría cristiana. De acuerdo con su versión, los residentes de esa zona comenzaron a regresar a sus viviendas después de que las fuerzas israelíes atacaran objetivos vinculados al grupo armado.
El funcionario aprovechó además para elogiar el desempeño de los militares israelíes en distintos escenarios de combate. Sostuvo que las tropas han infligido “golpes duros” a Hezbollah durante los últimos enfrentamientos y destacó la actuación de las unidades desplegadas tanto en territorio israelí como fuera de sus fronteras.

Las declaraciones del ministro se producen en un contexto de alta sensibilidad regional. El pasado fin de semana, Irán lanzó varias andanadas de misiles contra Israel como respuesta a bombardeos israelíes en Beirut. Teherán justificó esas acciones argumentando que los ataques contra la capital libanesa afectaban uno de los principales límites que había fijado para evitar una expansión del conflicto.
En respuesta, Israel llevó a cabo ataques contra objetivos iraníes y rechazó públicamente cualquier intento de vincular los acontecimientos del frente libanés con las decisiones militares adoptadas por Jerusalén. Katz ya había expresado esa posición el lunes, cuando aseguró que su país continuaría actuando en el Líbano pese a las advertencias formuladas por la República Islámica.
Desde entonces, ambos gobiernos han mantenido un intercambio de amenazas mientras observan de cerca la evolución de los acontecimientos en el norte de Israel y el sur del Líbano. Aunque Irán anunció la suspensión de sus ataques, las autoridades israelíes no han declarado el final de sus operaciones ni consideran cerrada la confrontación. Las palabras de Katz refuerzan esa postura y muestran que, para el gobierno israelí, la posibilidad de nuevas acciones militares contra Irán sigue sobre la mesa.
International,Relations,Diplomacy / Foreign Policy,Europe
INTERNACIONAL
WATCH: Hearing turmoil as Jasmine Crockett unloads on MLK’s niece in wild racially-charged rant

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Rep. Jasmine Crockett erupted at Republicans, calling them a «majority… White» party and accusing them of using a member of Martin Luther King Jr.’s family as a prop to shield themselves from allegations of racism while interrogating the Southern Poverty Law Center’s funding of hate groups.
Crockett, who is leaving office next year after a failed Senate bid, lambasted Republicans for expressing outrage at the SPLC while not addressing the «literal elephant in the room» — a reference to Martin Luther King Jr.’s more conservative niece, Alveda King.
Crockett disparaged civil rights activist Alveda King as a right-wing prop while accusing Republicans of trying to trick the public into thinking a «Doctor King» was criticizing the SPLC’s work. King later questioned whether Crockett was calling her a «bastard» of the King name.
«The vast majority on that side of the aisle… are White men. White men are lecturing people of color because the vast majority, actually any semblance of diversity comes from this [Democratic] side of the aisle,» Crockett said.
FIRST ON FOX: SPLC’S TAX-EXEMPT STATUS UNDER THREAT AFTER FIERY CAPITOL HILL HEARING
She said people of color don’t feel welcome in the GOP and «that’s why you have to parade someone who has the name ‘Doctor King’ attached to them so people can be confused.»
Notably, GOP Rep. Wesley Hunt, a fellow Black Texan, was on the committee’s dais and pointedly questioned SPLC leader Bryan Fair earlier in the day. Hunt often rebukes talk of race-based partisanship by quipping that he has been «Black my entire life.»
Crockett said Republicans were hypocritical in accusing the SPLC of funding hate groups, citing a debunked assertion about President Donald Trump’s comments following the 2017 White supremacist rally in Charlottesville.
She noted Trump had said there were «fine people on both sides,» but omitted that he later clarified he was referring to a community group opposing the removal of Gen. Robert E. Lee’s statue, a gathering that occurred before the neo-Nazi violence erupted later that day.
Crockett then claimed people on social media were wondering who the «Doctor King» was who was speaking out against the SPLC as the hearing progressed, and that Republicans were trying to make the public think the historic Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would be on their side.
NEARLY ALL SUSPECTS ARRESTED IN ST. PAUL CHURCH STORMING AS MLK’S NIECE SAYS TACTICS ‘NOT THE WAY’
Crockett said Republicans would be better served calling the Obama-supporting Martin Luther King III or his sister Bernice King to the hearing — suggesting they understand the civil rights icon’s teachings and positions better than Alveda.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, speaks at a public forum on the use of force by Department of Homeland Security agents at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 3, 2026. (Aaron Schwartz/Getty Images)
Before her time expired, she accused King and Republicans of «caping» for murdered activist Charlie Kirk — quoting a controversial statement by the Turning Point USA founder about the Civil Rights Act.
She also claimed Republicans hauled Fair and King before the committee because they wanted to distract from their failure to hold a hearing examining associates of deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
When House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, gaveled-out Crockett’s time and passed the floor to Rep. Russell Fry, R-S.C., the Republican gave King a chance to respond.
«I am a bit emotional,» King said of what Crockett had claimed. «I’m going to watch what I say.»
Crockett did not appear to look back at Alveda King and was briefly seen closing her notebook as she prepared to stand up.
JASMINE CROCKETT’S HISTORY OF PLAYING THE RACE CARD GOING AFTER CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL CRITICS

President Donald Trump listens to Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., during a meeting with inner city pastors at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 1, 2018. (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)
«It seems as though you (Crockett) have suggested that I am bastard to the King family legacy. I am legitimately the daughter of Reverend Alfred Daniel Williams King and Dr. Naomi Ruth Barber King,» Alveda King said.
Rev. A.D. King was Martin Luther King Jr.’s brother.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«We are a family who loves God. And I love you, God bless you,» King said before yielding back to Fry.
Fry then announced that, off-camera, Crockett had quickly left the room before King could substantively respond to her remarks.
maxine waters, issues, democrats, republicans, associated press, politics
INTERNACIONAL
UK spy powers draw US scrutiny over alleged Apple encryption backdoor demand

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
U.K. surveillance laws drew scrutiny from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio June 5 amid warnings they could expose communications of officials and American citizens, according to reports.
The concern centered on the U.K.’s use of secret Technical Capability Notices under the Investigatory Powers Act, which critics say could make U.S. companies weaken encryption or create «backdoors» weaken encryption or create «backdoors» while preventing firms from disclosing requests without U.K. government approval.
Critics have argued this could undermine privacy, create vulnerabilities and limit congressional oversight with one former intelligence official warning of a «standing invitation to Beijing.»
«We have already seen how this ends,» former Department of Defense official Andrew Badger told Fox News Digital.
JD VANCE ‘DIRECTLY’ CONVINCED UK TO DROP APPLE BACKDOOR DATA DEMAND, PROTECTING AMERICANS’ RIGHTS: US OFFICIAL
Rep. Jim Jordan said Republicans are «the party of common sense,» and Democrats are «the party that takes these crazy positions.» (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
«There are legitimate privacy concerns here, and those have been well aired. The less examined issue is national security,» Badger said.
«A backdoor compelled by one ally becomes a standing invitation to Beijing, Moscow and Tehran so once one government can quietly compel access, others will demand the same, and a one-off concession hardens into a permanent vulnerability,» he warned.
According to the Telegraph, a June 5 letter sent by Jordan to U.K. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, showed the Trump ally had called for a review.
The report said Mahmood’s decision had been to deny a U.S. company permission to speak with Congress about an alleged encryption backdoor notice.
Jordan was also said to have warned that a lack of bilateral coordination raised concerns about the «trust and effective partnership between our two countries.»
«Five Eyes works because every partner trusts the others not to weaken the systems they all depend on,» Badger, co-author of «The Great Heist: China’s Epic Campaign to Steal America’s Secrets,» said.
«If Washington also concludes that U.K. surveillance powers could inadvertently expose Americans and American officials to espionage, it puts real strain on the relationship and makes future cooperation on intelligence and cyber harder to sustain.»
US SPIES URGED TO REFOCUS EFFORTS ON AMERICA’S BACKYARD, NEW HOUSE INTEL CHAIR SAYS

The Thames House headquarters of MI5 in London on Nov. 18, 2025. Britain’s domestic security service has warned of growing state-backed threats, including more than 20 Iran-backed plots uncovered in the UK, as lawmakers consider new legislation targeting foreign state-linked groups. (Betty Laura Zapata/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
On the encryption issue, Badger noted that mainstream encrypted platforms now function as «de facto infrastructure for sensitive communication well beyond the consumer market.»
«Any access point built into them becomes a permanent target. It is not a private key the requesting government gets to keep to itself,» he said.
U.S. and British cyber officials have also repeatedly warned that an axis of hostile states — including Russia, China and Iran — poses threats to Western security and infrastructure.
As previously reported by Fox News Digital, cyberespionage by groups such as Salt Typhoon, linked to China, has carried out operations targeting sensitive communications.
«China is actively running one of the largest state-backed cyberespionage operations ever uncovered. The Salt Typhoon campaign has targeted hundreds of organizations across roughly 80 countries and, through those intrusions, gained access to sensitive communications and networks used by senior Western officials,» Badger warned.
«Chinese state hackers didn’t defeat encryption. They walked straight through the lawful-intercept systems telecom providers had built, reaching the communications of senior officials and even information about surveillance targets.»
CHINESE BIOWEAPON SMUGGLING CASE SHOWS US ‘TRAINS OUR ENEMIES,’ ‘LEARNED NOTHING’ FROM COVID: SECURITY EXPERT

The flag of China is flown behind a pair of surveillance cameras outside the Central Government Offices. (Roy Liu/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Reports also surfaced that U.K. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper used a burner phone during a recent trip to Beijing and raising further concerns about state-sponsored espionage.
Badger noted that the episode reflects a broader pattern of Chinese targeting of British democratic institutions, including the «hacking of senior Downing Street officials’ phones and an Electoral Commission breach that exposed the data of roughly 40 million voters,» he said.
«The telling thing is that no one issues burner phones for a trip to Sweden or Germany,» he said.
«The precaution is itself an admission of the threat environment. The working assumption — correctly — is that anything digital taken into China should be treated as potentially compromised.»
The systemic vulnerability also highlights a fundamental contradiction in Western diplomatic strategy, according to Badger.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«This case perfectly underscores the contradiction at the heart of the U.K. Labour government’s China policy: chasing positive economic relations and expanded trade with Beijing on one hand, while being forced to take elaborate precautions against a state whose core interests remain fundamentally at odds with its own on the other,» Badger said.
«You can’t simultaneously treat China as a trusted economic partner and a hostile intelligence threat. It’s a fundamental contradiction. The need to use burner phones symbolically underscore this.»
national security, cybercrime, uk politics, privacy, united kingdom
INTERNACIONAL
Por segundo día consecutivo, Estados Unidos lanzó ataques contra Irán y Teherán amenaza a los buques del estrecho de Ormuz

«El Comando Central estará muy ocupado»: la reunión que anticipó la nueva escalada en Medio Oriente
Trump dijo que sacó en secreto 100 millones de barriles de crudo a través del estrecho de Ormuz
POLITICA2 días agoVictoria Villarruel envió una corona de flores al funeral del Indio Solari y buscó diferenciarse del Gobierno
POLITICA2 días agoReforma laboral: qué cambia para los trabajadores con la revisión de más de 100 convenios colectivos vencidos
ECONOMIA17 horas agoLa advertencia del economista más escuchado por Milei: «Si Argentina tiene éxito, va a ser cara»


















