INTERNACIONAL
JD Vance dijo que Irán aceptó el regreso de los inspectores de la agencia atómica de la ONU
El vicepresidente de Estados Unidos, JD Vance, afirmó este lunes que Irán aceptó invitar nuevamente a los inspectores del Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica (OIEA) a su territorio, en lo que calificó como un “hito importante” tras la primera ronda de conversaciones bilaterales en Suiza orientadas a poner fin a la guerra en Oriente Medio.
“Los iraníes acordaron invitar de vuelta a los inspectores del OIEA a su país», dijo Vance ante periodistas en el complejo turístico de Bürgenstock, donde sus conversaciones con el negociador jefe de Irán, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, comenzaron el domingo. “Eso es un hito importante para el pueblo estadounidense y el primer paso para desnuclearizar de manera permanente o terminar de forma definitiva con un programa de armas nucleares en Irán“, agregó.
El funcionario sostuvo que la primera ronda de diálogo sentó “bases muy buenas” para un eventual acuerdo definitivo. “Sentamos bases muy buenas para un acuerdo final exitoso”, declaró. “El acuerdo final es la casa. Aún no construimos la casa, pero pusimos unos cimientos sólidos para llegar a un buen resultado para el pueblo estadounidense”, añadió.
Vance dijo además que espera que las conversaciones con los inspectores del OIEA sobre su regreso a Irán comiencen “de manera inminente”. “Espero que eso ocurra como mínimo esta semana, pero creemos que incluso algunas de esas conversaciones con los inspectores… y con el OIEA podrían darse hoy mismo», afirmó.
El director general del OIEA, Rafael Grossi, publicó el domingo en X que se encontraba en Bürgenstock y que se había reunido con el canciller suizo, Ignazio Cassis.
El vicepresidente estadounidense también buscó despejar dudas sobre el destino de los fondos iraníes que eventualmente sean descongelados en el marco de un acuerdo. “Si alguna vez descongelamos activos iraníes, podemos asegurarnos de que… el dinero iraní vaya a ayudar al pueblo de Irán y no a financiar el terrorismo”, sostuvo Vance, quien remarcó que las conversaciones en el resort suizo garantizaron que, “si los activos iraníes son descongelados alguna vez, van a servir para hacer más ricos a los agricultores estadounidenses y para alimentar al pueblo iraní”.
Las declaraciones de Vance se dan después de que, según informaron los mediadores Pakistán y Qatar, los negociadores acordaran una “hoja de ruta” para alcanzar un pacto definitivo dentro de un plazo de 60 días, con conversaciones técnicas que continuarán el resto de la semana en Bürgenstock. Ese acuerdo final buscará poner fin a la guerra que Estados Unidos e Israel lanzaron el 28 de febrero, y que llevó a Irán a responder con ataques de misiles y drones en la región, además de afectar la circulación por el estrecho de Ormuz, una vía clave para la economía mundial.
De acuerdo con los términos del acuerdo preliminar difundido la semana pasada por funcionarios estadounidenses, Irán diluirá sus reservas de uranio enriquecido, posiblemente mediante un proceso de “down-blending” en el sitio y bajo supervisión del OIEA. El organismo había estimado que Irán contaba con 440 kilogramos de uranio enriquecido al 60%, un nivel cercano al necesario para la fabricación de un arma nuclear. Teherán había suspendido la cooperación con el OIEA tras los ataques de Israel y Estados Unidos en junio de 2025, y los inspectores no habían tenido acceso al material desde entonces.
El propio Vance había encabezado, junto al yerno del presidente Donald Trump, Jared Kushner, y el enviado Steve Witkoff, a la delegación estadounidense que participó del primer tramo de conversaciones en Suiza, en el que también se abordaron —aunque de forma preliminar— cuestiones vinculadas al cese del fuego en el Líbano y al estatus del estrecho de Ormuz.
International,Relations,Diplomacy / Foreign Policy,Europe
INTERNACIONAL
Tras la ajustada victoria de Abelardo De la Espriella, Colombia inicia una transición tensa y repleta de dudas
INTERNACIONAL
Cops could be forced into race-based guessing game after Supreme Court move, Thomas joins dissent
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas on Monday dissented from the Supreme Court’s refusal to take up a case that they said forces police officers to create a separate set of rules for racial minorities.
«It is dangerous to allow an individual to be treated differently based on statistics, studies, or expert testimony that purports to show that members of the racial or ethnic group to which he belongs are more likely to act in a certain way than are members of other groups,» Alito wrote on behalf of himself and Thomas. «Here, the special treatment helped the individual; in other situations it will not.»
The case, U.S. v. Donte J. Carter, involved a Black man whose firearm and theft convictions were vacated after the D.C. Court of Appeals held that police seized him before they had reasonable suspicion. Officers later recovered a .40-caliber pistol from Carter’s pants and the government said the gun had been stolen from an FBI agent’s vehicle.
According to the D.C. court, «black Americans like [Carter] are ‘especially distrustful of law enforcement’» and therefore «‘less likely’ than other people ‘to terminate a police encounter’ due to skepticism that any attempt to exercise their constitutional rights will be respected.»
SUPREME COURT REJECTS BOSTON PARENTS’ APPEAL CLAIMING RACIAL BIAS IN AN ADMISSIONS POLICY
Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are pictured together. (Getty Images)
The D.C. court reasoned that Carter’s race was relevant to whether a reasonable person in his position would have felt free to end the police encounter. It ruled that the encounter effectively became a seizure, and that such an action was unlawful because police officers hadn’t established reasonable suspicion before subjecting him to it.
Alito and Thomas argued that the D.C. ruling effectively forces law enforcement to treat people differently based on their race, something precedent established by the Supreme Court prohibits.
«Under the test, officers will need to quickly assess a person’s race, and if officers and courts must craft special rules for black persons, what about dark-skinned Latinos, other Latinos, and members of other minority groups?» Alito continued. «We have said that our ’Constitution is color-blind.’ It ‘almost never’ allows government actors to treat persons differently based on their race.»
SUPREME COURT RULES ON KEY VOTING RIGHTS ACT RULE AS REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS WAGE REDISTRICTING WAR
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas appears before swearing in Pam Bondi as U.S. Attorney General in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 5, 2025. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
To support his claims, Alito cited Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Louisiana v. Callais and Shaw v. Reno.
«And we have rejected the proposition that the Constitution permits an individual to be treated differently based on a ‘perception that members of the same racial group — regardless of their age, education, economic status, or the community in which they live — think alike,’» Alito wrote, citing Shaw v. Reno.
This appears to be a direct challenge to the D.C. Court of Appeals, which lawyers representing the United States argued forced police officers to assume that all black people have the same attitudes toward police officers and would therefore feel uncomfortable exercising constitutional rights in their presence.
TRUMP’S FIRING POWER FACES TWIN SUPREME COURT TESTS, BUT ONE AGENCY MAY GET SPECIAL TREATMENT
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito are seen inside the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., in December 2023. (Jacquelyn Martin-Pool/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Carter, the individual Alito noted was helped by the case, initially lied to officers by answering in the negative when approached and asked if he was carrying a weapon.
The police then asked Carter to pull his pants up, at which point they noticed an L-shaped bulge which was later identified as a .40-caliber pistol that had been stolen from a federal agent’s vehicle.
supreme court, second amendment, police and law enforcement, constitution, fbi
INTERNACIONAL
Keith Kellogg tells Iranian dissidents the ‘window is open’ to force regime change in Tehran
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
As the Trump administration pushes forward with a new Iran deal, retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg told a Paris gathering of the National Council of Resistance of Iran — an exiled Iranian opposition coalition aligned with the People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran (MEK) — that Tehran’s rulers are weaker than they have been in decades and urged dissidents to seize what he described as a historic opening.
«The window is open wider than at any moment in a generation, and windows do not stay open forever,» Kellogg said at the two-day event. «The theocratic regime in Tehran will not leave voluntarily. You must force it. The hope is here. Now must come the action.»
Kellogg, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant general and former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine, framed any disarmament agreement not as an endpoint, but as «the first step of something far larger,» saying it should become the foundation for Iran’s future without the current regime.
POMPEO SAYS IRANIAN REGIME HAS ARRIVED AT ‘NATURAL TERMINUS’: ‘LET’S NOT WASTE THIS HISTORIC OPPORTUNITY’
Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg speaks at the National Council of Resistance of Iran’s two-day conference in Paris, where he urged Iranian opposition supporters to seize what he called a historic opening against Tehran’s regime. (Mousa Mohebbi)
Maryam Rajavi, the NCRI’s president-elect, used her remarks at the conference to argue that neither war nor negotiations had solved the threat posed by Tehran’s rulers. «A peaceful, non-nuclear Iran is possible only through the overthrow of this regime by the Iranian people and their organized Resistance,» Rajavi said, adding that any international agreement to end the war should include an end to executions of political prisoners and the killing of protesters.
Kellogg also invoked the NCRI’s 2002 disclosure of Iran’s Natanz and Arak nuclear sites, saying the group should play a role in pushing for strict verification of any agreement. «When I say trust, but verify, understand that verification is not an abstraction to this Council. It is your legacy,» he said. «You must be the conscience that ensures every barrel of uranium leaves, every centrifuge stops, and every promise on that page becomes a fact on the ground.»
The remarks came as NCRI organizers had expected tens of thousands of Iranian expatriates from North America and Europe to attend two days of events in Paris. French authorities banned a planned outdoor rally, citing security threats. A French court later upheld the ban, pointing to specific intelligence about alleged bomb threats and risks of violence involving rival Iranian opposition factions, including possible threats from Iranian regime-linked actors or monarchist groups.
FRANCE CONDEMNS IRAN PROTEST CRACKDOWN, WEIGHS SATELLITE INTERNET AID AMID BLACKOUT
Maryam Rajavi, president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, speaks at the NCRI’s two-day conference in Paris, where she called for a democratic republic in Iran and said any international agreement should include an end to executions of political prisoners. June 21, 2026. (Mousa Mohebbi)
The NCRI’s main member organization is the MEK, which was previously listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S., U.K. and European Union before being delisted in 2012. The group is a major thorn in the side of the Tehran regime and has been the target of alleged Iranian plots in the U.S. and Europe, including a foiled 2018 bomb plot against the group’s rally outside Paris.
Despite the ban, demonstrators gathered at the site on Saturday. Police ordered the crowd to disperse and arrested around 20 people, a police source told AFP.
Ali Safavi, a member of the NCRI’s Foreign Affairs Committee, told Fox News Digital that the French decision amounted to «an unjustifiable act of capitulation,» arguing that Paris should have protected the rally rather than banning it, «Rather than yielding to intimidation, France should have defended the fundamental democratic right to peaceful assembly.»
Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson also criticized the French ban, calling it a «tragic mistake» and saying Western capitals must allow Iranian opposition voices to be heard.
IRAN GOES DARK AS REGIME UNLEASHES FORCE, CYBER TOOLS TO CRUSH PROTESTS
Supporters of the National Council of Resistance of Iran gather in Paris on June 20, 2026, after French authorities banned an outdoor rally against repression and executions in Iran. Police ordered demonstrators to disperse and arrested around 20 people, according to AFP. (National Council of Resistance of Iran)
«If the voices of freedom are to be heard in Iran, then we in the West must allow those voices of freedom to be heard in our capitals and around the world,» Johnson said during his speech.
Former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba also addressed the event Saturday, linking Ukraine’s struggle against Russia to the Iranian opposition’s fight against Tehran. Kuleba said Ukrainians had wanted to join the rally and were «appalled» by the French ban, adding, «The people of Ukraine stand by those who defend democracy, freedom, liberty in their lands.»
He also pointed to Iran’s support for Russia’s war effort, saying that while Russian ballistic missiles were targeting Kyiv, drones using technology «provided to Russia by the current regime in Iran» were also striking Ukraine.
Supporters of the National Council of Resistance of Iran gather in Paris after French authorities banned a rally against repression and executions in Iran, June 20, 2026. (National Council of Resistance of Iran)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«Like you, I know very well what it means to be attacked and killed and destroyed by the regime that currently holds its grip over the people of Iran,» Kuleba said.
The French government did not immediately respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment.
iran, world protests, war with iran, boris johnson
Tras la ajustada victoria de Abelardo De la Espriella, Colombia inicia una transición tensa y repleta de dudas
Cops could be forced into race-based guessing game after Supreme Court move, Thomas joins dissent
Adorni anunció la salida de Javier Lanari del Gobierno
Diputados: LLA convoca a la comisión de Asuntos Constitucionales por el caso Adorni para desactivar la sesión de mañana
AI-first: los detalles de la estrategia de Inteligencia Artificial del banco Santander
RB Leipzig presentó a Demichelis como DT: sus «ganas de competir» en Champions, el seco mensaje del Mallorca y ¿hasta cuándo firma?
LA DOBLE VARA ZURDA: Militantes K prefieren el pasado dictatorial y los excesos de Maradona antes que el éxito limpio de Messi
Preocupación en el oficialismo por el impacto digital del caso Adorni y la insuficiencia del “efecto Mundial”
El lapidario posteo de Javier Milei contra Florencia Peña por la fake news sobre la muerte del papá de Messi
Difundieron videos en los que Jésica Cirio aparece junto a miles de dólares
POLITICA1 día agoLA DOBLE VARA ZURDA: Militantes K prefieren el pasado dictatorial y los excesos de Maradona antes que el éxito limpio de Messi
- POLITICA1 día ago
Preocupación en el oficialismo por el impacto digital del caso Adorni y la insuficiencia del “efecto Mundial”
- POLITICA2 días ago
Difundieron videos en los que Jésica Cirio aparece junto a miles de dólares
