INTERNACIONAL
Could Narges Mohammadi unite Iran’s opposition? Husband says imprisoned Nobel laureate still fighting
Where’s the Opposition in Iran to Oust Regime?
David Asman and Jonathan Schanzer analyze the ongoing US military campaign in Iran, Operation Epic Fury, where CENTCOM reports over 10,000 targets struck. They discuss the decimation of Iranian regime leadership and the surprising reluctance of European allies to fully support President Trump’s aggressive strategy, citing past diplomatic disputes and potential economic pressure. The segment also explores the challenges of an internal opposition movement amid severe human rights abuses.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
EXCLUSIVE: As Iran’s opposition struggles to find a unifying figure amid war, repression and near-total internet blackouts, the husband of jailed Nobel Peace Prize laureate and Iranian human rights activist Narges Mohammadi says his wife remains physically battered but politically unbroken, even as she sits in prison after what he describes as a brutal arrest and beating.
«Narges is a human rights activist and an advocate for civil society,» her husband, Taghi Rahmani, told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview from Europe in exile. «In mobilizing society, and in organizing and shaping civil institutions, she is an active and courageous woman.»
At a moment when Iran’s ruling establishment is reeling from the aftermath of U.S. and Israeli strikes, a fragile ceasefire, economic collapse and intensified crackdowns, Mohammadi’s name is emerging in a new light: Not only as a global symbol of resistance, but potentially as one of the few opposition figures whose legitimacy comes from suffering inside the system rather than exile, dynasty or factional politics.
INSIDE TEHRAN AFTER STRIKES: IRANIAN WOMAN DESCRIBES FEAR, CHECKPOINTS AND PEOPLE USED AS ‘HUMAN SHIELDS’
Mohammadi, awarded the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize while imprisoned, has spent decades as one of Iran’s most prominent women’s rights and human rights activists.
Trained as an engineer and later a journalist, she served as vice president of the Defenders of Human Rights Center, founded by fellow Nobel laureate Shirin Ebadi and became internationally known for campaigning against compulsory hijab laws, solitary confinement, prisoner abuse and the death penalty.
Narges Mohammadi, Iranian human rights activist and vice president of the Defenders of Human Rights Center, poses for a portrait in an undated photo. (Reuters)
Now, according to her husband, her condition has worsened dramatically.
«Narges is currently detained in Zanjan prison,» he said. «She was arrested in Mashhad during the month of Dey (around January) and was severely beaten. During her arrest, she received numerous blows, resulting in severe injuries to her chest, head, body and lungs.»
Rahmani said prison medical authorities determined she should be transferred for treatment under her own physician’s supervision in Iran, but that Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence is refusing the transfer and insisting she remain in Zanjan.
«Spiritually and mentally, Narges remains steadfast,» he said. «She believes the Islamic Republic is not desirable for the Iranian people, and advocates for a system based on freedom, human rights and open relations with the world. Physically, however, she has sustained severe trauma and urgently requires medical attention.»
Rahmani said the last time he spoke with his wife was the night before she left for Mashhad, Iran, where she was later arrested.
The Nobel banquet at the Grand Hotel in Oslo on Sunday, in connection with the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize 2023. Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi is imprisoned in Iran and is therefore represented by her children Ali and Kiana Rahmani and her spouse Taghi Rahmani, in Oslo, Norway Dec. 10, 2023. (NTB/Rodrigo Freitas via Reuters)
His account offers a rare inside look into the life of one of Iran’s most internationally recognized dissidents at a moment when questions over who could realistically lead opposition to the regime are intensifying.
«We hear a great deal about the Iranian opposition, yet media in the free world often lack a precise definition and a full understanding of what the Iranian opposition actually is,» Iranian anti-regime activist Maryam Shariatmadari told Fox News Digital.
Shariatmadari, one of the most recognizable faces of Iran’s «Girls of Revolution Street» movement, a wave of anti-regime protests that began in 2017 when Iranian women publicly removed their hijabs and stood in defiance of the country’s mandatory veiling laws, was sentenced to prison in 2018 after publicly removing her hijab in protest.
WHAT’S NEXT FOR IRAN’S TERROR ARMY, THE IRGC, AFTER DEVASTATING MILITARY SETBACKS?
Ali Rahmani, son of imprisoned Iranian human rights activist Narges Mohammadi, speaks after receiving the Nobel Peace Prize 2023 on her behalf at Oslo City Hall in Norway. (Fredrik Varfjell/NTB)
According to Shariatmadari, one camp consists of Iranians who view the 1979 Islamic Revolution itself as the foundational national disaster, believing Iran’s trajectory was derailed when the Shah fell. The second includes former revolutionaries, reformists, communist factions and groups such as the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), many of whom emerged from or once supported the revolutionary system before later opposing it.
«The first group considers the 1979 revolution a disaster and seeks a return to Iran’s previous path,» she said, while the second includes «those who participated in the revolution but later became opposition figures after being excluded from power.»
That distinction, she argues, helps explain why Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last shah, remains uniquely recognizable among many anti-regime Iranians despite spending decades outside the country.
Lisa Daftari, foreign policy analyst and editor-in-chief of The Foreign Desk news platform, told Fox News Digital, «Inside Iran, Pahlavi remains one of the only opposition figures with broad name recognition, and his message clearly resonated during the January protests, which is why his name still carries weight for many Iranians both inside the country and in the diaspora.»
Pahlavi himself sharpened that message Friday after a series of European appearances, accusing both European politicians and journalists of ignoring the scale of Iranian suffering.
«I spent the past several weeks traveling across Europe, speaking to members of parliaments, governments, and the press,» Pahlavi said in a video statement on his official X account. «My visit had one objective: to give a voice to the millions of Iranians held hostage by the Islamic Republic … But I can now say with confidence that silencing, that censorship is not just happening at the hands of the regime in Iran, but by the international and particularly the European media.»
EXILED IRANIAN CROWN PRINCE REVEALS 6-STEP PLAN TO EXERT PRESSURE ON TEHRAN’S REGIME
Iran’s Reza Pahlavi, exiled son of Shah Reza Pahlavi, is protected by security after he was attacked with a red fluid, following a news conference in Berlin, Germany, April 23, 2026. (Markus Schreiber/The Associated Press )
He went on to condemn what he described as European indifference to the mass killing of protesters and political executions, saying that across two press conferences in Stockholm and Berlin attended by more than 150 journalists, «not a single one» asked about the tens of thousands he says were killed during January’s crackdown or the political prisoners facing execution.
«Whether or not Europe stands with us … I will fight for my people and my country,» Pahlavi said. «We will fight until Iran is free.»
Still, even some supporters acknowledge why the administration has hesitated to openly embrace him as a transitional figure.
Daftari warned that overt Western backing could backfire by making him appear externally imposed rather than domestically legitimized.
«The Trump administration’s decision not to more openly embrace him as a transitional figure likely reflects several factors: a deep wariness of making regime change the explicit end goal or appearing to engineer it after Iraq and Afghanistan, concern that overt U.S. backing could put an even bigger target on his back and a strategy that is currently focused less on anointing a successor and more on degrading the regime’s capacity to threaten its own people, the region and the United States,» she said.
If Pahlavi represents dynastic memory and explicit regime-change politics, Mohammadi represents something profoundly different.
AS AIRSTRIKES RAIN DOWN ON THE IRANIAN REGIME, CAN A FRACTURED OPPOSITION UNITE TO LEAD IF IT FALLS?
Reza Pahlavi, son of Iran’s former Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, speaks during a press conference in Paris June 23, 2025. (Thomas Padilla/AP)
Mohammadi’s place within that landscape is distinct due to her unique kind of legitimacy at a time when many Iranians are searching not only for opposition to the regime, but for a figure who embodies endurance under it.
For now, however, Rahmani warns that Iran’s domestic conditions may make any mass uprising extraordinarily difficult.
«As you know, war serves as an excuse to suppress domestic forces within a country,» he said. «This war has now increased the intensity of the regime’s actions against the opposition.»
He argued that despite internal divisions, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has effectively consolidated power, militarized the streets and severely weakened civil society.
«The Islamic Republic has practically taken control of the streets during wartime and has severely weakened Iran’s civil society, which is the guarantor of democracy. In our opinion, this war, under these conditions, is not to the benefit of Iran, nor to the benefit of the Iranian people.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
A picture of Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi on the wall of the Grand Hotel in central Oslo before the Nobel banquet, in connection with the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize 2023, in Oslo, Norway, Dec. 10, 2023. (NTB/Javad Parsa via Reuters)
That may be the defining challenge for Iran’s opposition today: not simply finding a leader, but surviving long enough under extraordinary repression for one to emerge.
Whether Mohammadi can become that figure remains uncertain. But from prison, her husband says, she has not stopped believing Iran’s future can be different.
The Iranian mission to the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.
war with iran, ali khamenei, persecutions, human rights, iran
INTERNACIONAL
Huida de película: escapó de China en un gomón y con un celular casi sin batería y llegó a Canadá
Dong dice que superó el miedo a la muerte
Del centro de refugiados a Canadá
Dong promete seguir adelante con su activismo
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Two of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices criticized the majority’s decision not to take up attorney Alan Dershowitz’s defamation case against CNN, saying the high court missed an opportunity to revisit a controversial 1960s defamation precedent.
The dissent from the court’s conservative wing effectively called on the justices to revisit longstanding libel precedent, echoing President Donald Trump’s 2016 calls to loosen U.S. libel laws.
Dershowitz, who has represented famous figures like Trump, O.J. Simpson and Leona Helmsley, claimed CNN deceptively edited a snippet of his defense during Trump’s first impeachment trial about «quid pro quo[s]» to make it sound like he said the opposite of his fuller statements and used that clip to damage his reputation.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch — appointees of Presidents George H.W. Bush and Trump, respectively — criticized their colleagues for relying on the «actual malice» standard in evaluating whether CNN defamed Dershowitz, arguing the standard is not rooted in the Constitution and instead was created in the Supreme Court’s landmark 1964 decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.
ISRAELI PM NETANYAHU INITIATING DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST NEW YORK TIMES OVER CONTROVERSIAL ‘DOG RAPE’ STORY
«Predictably, Dershowitz did not prevail under that exacting standard, which this Court created in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Dershowitz now asks this Court to overrule Sullivan and related precedents,» the conservatives wrote.
Dershowitz also reacted to the dissent in remarks to Fox News Digital, calling the majority’s standard «impossible» to overcome.
«All the judges agreed that CNN lied about me,» he said Monday.
«But the majority ruled, over dissents, that I had to prove actual malice by clear and convincing evidence— an impossible standard that I believe will be overruled in years to come.»
The Sullivan case arose after a Montgomery, Alabama, commissioner sued the Times for libel over a full-page advertisement criticizing how the city treated civil rights protesters.
An Alabama jury awarded damages to L.B. Sullivan even though he was not mentioned by name in the ad. The Supreme Court later reversed the ruling, holding that a public official cannot prevail in a defamation case unless he proves the statement was made with «actual malice» — knowing it was false or acting with reckless disregard for the truth.
«The actual-malice standard for public figures bears no relation to the text, history, or structure of the Constitution,» Thomas and Gorsuch wrote Monday in Dershowitz’ case.
«Instead, the founding generation believed that, if anything, public figures had stronger claims for damages when they were defamed.»
As one historical example, Thomas and Gorsuch pointed to the Sedition Act of 1798, which imposed a far lower threshold for defamatory statements about public officials.
Then-Rep. Matthew Lyon, D-Vt., was prosecuted under the law for characterizing President John Adams as someone with «unbounded thirst for ridiculous pomp, foolish adulation and selfish avarice» during American tensions with France.
JUDGE DISMISSES TRUMP’S $10B DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE WALL STREET JOURNAL OVER EPSTEIN STORY
President Thomas Jefferson allowed that law to expire in 1801 and pardoned many caught in its net.
More recently, Trump has called for loosening U.S. libel laws, echoing concerns similar to those expressed by Thomas and Gorsuch about the court’s defamation jurisprudence.
While running for president in 2016, Trump pledged to «open up our libel laws» if elected to pursue the ideological conglomerate he often labels «fake news.»
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
Journalists who «write purposefully negative and horrible and false articles — we can sue them and win lots of money,» Trump said.
He has often singled out defendant CNN more than most – famously warring regularly with its then-White House correspondent, podcaster Jim Acosta.
During one 2017 incident, Acosta repeatedly interrupted Trump during a news conference, leading the president to demand he not «be rude.».» Trump informed Acosta that he would not be taking a question from him because «you are fake news.»
Supreme Court Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas wait to leave the stage after the inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/AFP via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«We’re going to open up libel laws, and we’re going to have people sue you like you’ve never got sued before,» Trump said at the 2016 event, going on to further name-drop the Times and Washington Post.
The ruling, along with Trump’s own lawsuit against the Ted Turner-founded network over its use of the term «Big Lie» to describe his claims about the 2020 election, leaves open the possibility that the court could revisit Sullivan, though such a shift appears unlikely in the near term.
Fox News Digital reached out to CNN for comment on the dissent.
first amendment, politics, federal courts, donald trump, judiciary, media, supreme court
INTERNACIONAL
Descubren cómo una proteína cerebral expande la enfermedad de Alzheimer de neurona a neurona
Científicos de los Estados Unidos descubrieron que una proteína cerebral llamada Arc transporta la Tau tóxica, la sustancia que destruye neuronas en Alzheimer, desde células enfermas a células sanas y acelera así el avance de la enfermedad.
El hallazgo, publicado en la revista Cell, puede cambiar la forma de entender cómo progresa el Alzheimer y abre una vía para frenarlo.
Ese trastorno es la forma más frecuente de demencia: destruye las neuronas del cerebro de manera progresiva y afecta la memoria, el lenguaje y la capacidad de realizar tareas cotidianas.
La proteína Tau, que en condiciones normales ayuda a mantener la estructura interna de las neuronas, se deforma en esta enfermedad, se vuelve tóxica y forma grumos que matan las células.
Se estima que más de 55 millones de personas viven con demencia en el mundo, según la organización Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI). Alzheimer representa cerca del 70% de esos casos.
Arc: el mensajero con un pasajero clandestino
Arc tiene una función normal y vital: empaqueta información dentro de pequeñas burbujas llamadas vesículas extracelulares —algo así como sobres microscópicos— y las envía de neurona en neurona. El problema surge cuando la Tau tóxica se cuela dentro de esos “sobres” y viaja con ellos hacia células que aún están sanas.
Mitali Tyagi, investigadora de la Universidad de Washington en St. Louis y primera autora del estudio, comparó las acumulaciones de Tau con “monstruos de pegamento” porque, “se pegan entre sí y bloquean el transporte dentro de la neurona”.
Pero también se fragmentan en piezas menores que migran a nuevas células y corrompen la Tau sana que encuentran allí.
El equipo comparó ratones con Alzheimer que tenían Arc con ratones que carecían de ella. En los segundos, las vesículas extracelulares contenían apenas rastros de Tau tóxica y ya no podían dañar neuronas sanas.
“Cuando eliminamos Arc, vimos que la transferencia de Tau se redujo de manera drástica. Casi desapareció”, afirmó la científica.
Arc presenta un dilema: aunque facilita el avance de la enfermedad, también protege a las neuronas enfermas en etapas tempranas al expulsar el exceso de Tau hacia afuera. Sin esa válvula de escape, las células enfermas mueren más rápido.
Eliminar Arc de raíz, entonces, no sería la solución. El equipo apunta a algo más preciso: interceptar las vesículas con Tau tóxica después de que salen de la neurona enferma, pero antes de que lleguen a una sana.
Esa ventana —entre la expulsión y la infección— es donde los investigadores ven la mayor oportunidad terapéutica.
Ahora se sabe que Arc cumple un papel doble: propaga la enfermedad pero también protege a las neuronas enfermas en etapas tempranas. El gran desafío es cómo diseñar una terapia que bloquee su efecto dañino sin eliminar su función protectora.
Desde los Estados Unidos, el doctor Jason Shepherd, profesor de neurobiología de la Universidad de Utah y autor principal del estudio, contestó a Infobae: “Creemos que la clave está en intervenir sobre el momento en que las neuronas vecinas absorben la Tau que viene dentro de las vesículas extracelulares. Si logramos bloquear esa absorción, las células enfermas seguirían expulsando su exceso de Tau —y así se protegerían— pero la Tau tóxica ya no podría entrar en las células sanas. Eso detendría la propagación sin eliminar el efecto protector de Arc».
Para pacientes con Alzheimer en etapa temprana, detener ese tráfico podría frenar el deterioro cognitivo futuro.
Una terapia de ese tipo no repararía el daño ya existente en el cerebro, pero podría evitar que la enfermedad avance hacia nuevas regiones. Para millones de pacientes en etapas iniciales, eso marcaría una diferencia real.
¿En qué plazo realista podría traducirse ese enfoque en un tratamiento para pacientes con Alzheimer en etapa temprana?, preguntó Infobae al doctor Shepherd. “Sí, esa es exactamente la idea. Todavía hay mucho por resolver y la mayor parte de este trabajo se realizó en ratones. El próximo paso es trabajar con células humanas y, a partir de ahí, avanzar hacia el desarrollo de fármacos. Ese camino llevará tiempo”, contestó.
El equipo también encontró vesículas con Arc y Tau en tejido cerebral humano, una pista de que el mecanismo podría operar de forma similar en personas.
Shepherd fue cauteloso al respecto: “La mayor parte del trabajo lo hemos hecho en ratones, no en humanos. Tenemos algunas pistas, pero aún no lo sabemos con certeza”.
En diálogo con Infobae, el doctor Ricardo Allegri, investigador del Conicet, jefe de neurología cognitiva de Fleni y director de la carrera de posgrado de Psicología con Orientación en Neurociencia de la Universidad Maimónides (UMAI), comentó sobre el nuevo estudio publicado en Cell.
“La hiperfosforilación de la proteína Tau desestabiliza los microtúbulos y lleva a la muerte neuronal. La patología Tau está directamente relacionada con la sintomatología del Alzheimer, a diferencia de la patología amiloide, que no lo está”, aclaró.
“Ya sabíamos que la Tau patológica se contagia de neurona a neurona siguiendo los circuitos funcionales neuronales. Pero no conocíamos cómo pasaba de una neurona a otra. El nuevo estudio aporta resultados en esa dirección”, resaltó.
“La proteína Arc interviene en la formación de las vesículas y en su volcado. Este hallazgo es sumamente importante porque, si podemos intervenir sobre este mecanismo, podríamos frenar el avance de la enfermedad y sus síntomas”, sostuvo el doctor Allegri.
El estudio contó con financiamiento de los Institutos Nacionales de Salud (NIH), la Asociación de Alzheimer y la Iniciativa Chan-Zuckerberg, entre otras organizaciones.
Detectar la enfermedad en sus primeras etapas es la mejor forma de actuar antes de que el daño se extienda. Las señales de alerta más frecuentes son la pérdida de memoria reciente, la dificultad para encontrar palabras, la desorientación en lugares conocidos y los cambios repentinos de humor o personalidad.
Ante esos síntomas, la recomendación de los especialistas es consultar a un médico clínico o neurólogo sin demora.
Un diagnóstico temprano permite iniciar tratamientos que, aunque no curan la enfermedad, pueden ralentizar su progresión y mejorar la calidad de vida del paciente y su entorno.
adult,checkup,clinic,computer,corridor,ct,diagnosis,diagnostic,discussion,doctor,equipment,exam,examination,expertise,explaining,health,healthcare,healthy,hospital,illness,man,medic,medical,medicine,monitor,mri,occupation,patient,radiologist,radiology,ray,scan,senior,sick,treatment,uniform,visit,wheelchair,woman,women,work,workplace,x-ray,xray,young,young adult
Quién es Nicolás Trombino, el nuevo novio de Jesica Cirio, al que sumaron a la investigación judicial
Qué dijo Diego Santilli sobre su designación como jefe de Gabinete y sobre la salida de Manuel Adorni
Invertir en Inteligencia Artificial sin ser experto: cómo funcionan los fondos ETF
La meditación salvó su carrera en el tenis y ahora entrena jóvenes mientras patrulla las calles de Tailandia
Huida de película: escapó de China en un gomón y con un celular casi sin batería y llegó a Canadá
Thomas, Gorsuch target landmark ruling Trump says protects the ‘fake news’
El punto de quiebre que sentó la suerte de Manuel Adorni y los preparativos que hace el Gobierno ante su inminente salida
La bomba de Nico Occhiato tras el escándalo de Florencia Peña con Messi: “Lo más groso que pudimos haber logrado”
Una escena estremecedora: el dato más doloroso de los minutos posteriores a la muerte de Ernestina Pais
Cómo ganar $20 millones con Mercado Pago: el paso a paso para quienes cobran ANSES
POLITICA2 días agoEl punto de quiebre que sentó la suerte de Manuel Adorni y los preparativos que hace el Gobierno ante su inminente salida
- CHIMENTOS2 días ago
La bomba de Nico Occhiato tras el escándalo de Florencia Peña con Messi: “Lo más groso que pudimos haber logrado”
- CHIMENTOS2 días ago
Una escena estremecedora: el dato más doloroso de los minutos posteriores a la muerte de Ernestina Pais
