INTERNACIONAL
El huevo de la serpiente en los campus universitarios
¡Quien iba a imaginar que el grito que recorría los campus de la Sorbona francesa a finales de 1800, se repetiría con la misma carga de odio en los campus universitarios del siglo XXI! El famoso “abajo los judíos” y su colofón “muerte a los judíos”, coreado por masas de estudiantes barbarizados que insultaban a Emile Zola y pedían la “ejecución inmediata” del capitán Alfred Dreyfus, se convirtió en un augurio amenazador de la tragedia que teñiría de sangre la piel de Europa. Como bien intuyó Theodor Herzl, a los judíos europeos se les acababa el tiempo, no en vano crecía el antisemitismo en todo el continente: en Viena acababa de ganar las elecciones Karl Lueger gracias al discurso antijudío; en el Imperio Ruso se producían progromos letales desde Moldavia a Rusia, pasando por Ucrania; y en Bohemia se condenaba a muerte a través de los libelos de sangre. Herlz intuyó que solo se podía garantizar la supervivencia del pueblo judío si conseguía un estado reconocido, es decir, conquistaba el derecho internacional. Ahí nació el sionismo, como escudo y protección para un pueblo paria secularmente perseguido y diezmado. Después vendría lo ya conocido, y Europa acabaría asesinando a tres cuartas partes de su población judía: quemando su alma judía, se quemaba a sí misma.
De la 1898 a 2026, y de la Sorbona a los campus norteamericanos, van 128 años en los que todo pasó y pareció que nada entendimos. La nueva oleada antisemita que inflama a los jóvenes manifestantes, se alimenta de la oscuridad de las redes y se multiplica con el libelo y la mentira, pero no es nueva, sino un calco preciso de las oleadas antisemitas que recorrieron la piel de la historia. Cambian los instrumentos y las formas, pero se mantienen intactos los prejuicios y los males que provocan. Sabemos desde siempre que el antisemitismo es la fiebre que detecta la enfermedad, la medida que nos indica cuando una sociedad se endurece, se degrada y se vuelve intolerante. Cada vez en la historia que los judíos han sufrido por su condición judía, el mundo ha vivido situaciones muy trágicas. Es el estigma más letal de la historia y ninguna sociedad sale indemne cuando esparce su veneno. Luchar contra la judeofobia es responsabilidad de todos, pero sobre todo es la responsabilidad de los que no somos judíos.
¿Qué cabe hacer con la oleada antisemita que recorre el mundo? Muchas son las instituciones democráticas -judías y no judías- que trabajan para frenar este fenómeno de odio, pero más allá de los análisis, los debates y la lucha contra los libelos virales que navegan por todas las formas de comunicación, es necesario que las instituciones planteen medidas legales, contundentes y pedagógicas para combatir el discurso de odio. Y es en este punto donde se enmarca la cuestión de los campus universitarios norteamericanos, cuya derivada antisemita desde el 7 de Octubre de 2023, ha sido el foco más brutal y efectivo de propagación del odio. En este sentido, es una buena noticia la decisión del departamento de justicia de demandar a la Universidad de California en los Ángeles (UCLA) por antisemitismo, acusada de permitir un “ambiente educativo hostil” y de actuar con “indiferencia deliberada” ante las agresiones y escraches contra estudiantes judíos en los últimos tiempos. Las 53 páginas del expediente judicial se centran sobre todo en las acciones de los campamentos palestinos vinculados al Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) (la organización que cofundó Zohran Mamdani en la universidad Bowdoin), con agresiones de todo tipo. Según la denuncia, manifestantes encapuchados “golpearon, patearon y atacaron con gas pimienta” a estudiantes judíos en reiteradas ocasiones, sin que las autoridades universitarias actuaran con la celeridad necesaria. Las consecuencias de la denuncia pueden tener un fuerte impacto financiero para UCLA, tanto con la suspensión de nuevos contratos públicos, como la obligación de retornar los fondos federales que han recibido.
Y con UCLA, son más de 60 los expedientes a las universidades bajo sospecha del departamento de Educación norteamericano, con Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Princeton o Berkeley a la cabeza. El caso de Harvard es especialmente notorio, sobre todo después del papel que hizo su ex presidenta Claudine Gay cuando, a la pregunta de si “pedir el genocidio de los judíos violaba las normas de Harvard sobre intimidación y asedio”, respondió que “depende del contexto”. Otras universidades como Northwestern, Cornell o Brown han cerrado acuerdos de resolución con el gobierno pagando multas que van de los 50 a los 75 millones de dólares, y todas ellas se han comprometido a crear protocolos estrictos contra el antisemitismo. Muchas de ellas han prohibido oficialmente la presencia del SJP y otros grupos afines, aunque ninguna lo ha hecho por antisemitismo, sino por “violar las normas cívicas del campus”.
Sea vía denuncia o vía resolución acordada, lo cierto es que la acción del gobierno contra las universidades demuestra cierta eficacia en el control de los campus universitarios, cuya orgía de odio a los judíos llegó a la cifra de 1.600 actos violentos contra estudiantes judíos durante el tiempo de la guerra en Gaza. Pero sería ingenuo pensar que con ello quedará neutralizado el discurso antisemita, especialmente en su versión antisionista, la versión más cool del viejo antisemitismo. Lo cierto es que la judeofobia ha impactado en los discursos de izquierdas de manera muy activa, como lo ha hecho también en la derecha populista. El odio al judío vuelve a ser el comodín de muchas causas y la coartada de la violencia dialéctica. En este sentido, ha sido mayúscula la irresponsabilidad de las grandes universidades norteamericanas que confundieron el derecho al libre pensamiento, con el derecho a la hostigación y el odio. ¿Tendrán algo que ver los millones de dólares que ha aportado Qatar a dichas universidades? En el caso de Harvard, según el portal de Educación, habría recibido, de manera directa o indirecta, unos 324 millones de dólares…
Sea Qatar mediante, o por la inoperancia de los dirigentes universitarios, o por la demagogia de las izquierdas más violentes, o por todo sumado, el problema más grave es que el huevo de la serpiente se ha inoculado en los campus donde se forman las nuevas generaciones y sus nuevos líderes. Es entre los jóvenes donde más ha crecido la judeofobia, con especial aumento entre los jóvenes universitarios. Ello no es grave solo para los judíos, sino para todos los ciudadanos, porque ninguna sociedad sale indemne del antisemitismo. El odio destruye, embrutece, contamina y ennegrece la sociedad, y nunca crea nada. El odio solo genera odio.
X: @RaholaOficial
Web:
Instagram: pilar_rahola/
antisemitismo,campus,universidad,serpientes,propaganda,odio,discriminación,metáfora,protesta
INTERNACIONAL
China quiere que la guerra se eternice en Medio Oriente y multiplica su ayuda al régimen de Irán
China no quiere una solución a corto plazo en Irán. El régimen conducido por Xi Jinping apuesta a que su principal rival militar, económico, comercial, tecnológico y estratégico se empantane una larga temporada negociando y gastando su arsenal en Medio Oriente. Busca evitar que Washington se enfoque definitivamente en el Indo-Pacífico. Pero Beijing juega con fuego y la última de sus maniobras podría destrabar la venta de armas a Taiwán aprobada por el Congreso de los Estados Unidos que por ahora la Casa Blanca mantiene en stand by.
De acuerdo a una investigación de la agencia internacional Reuters, Irán recibirá de China, en las próximas semanas, 400 lanzadores de misiles antiaéreos de uso sencillo y difíciles de detectar: se disparan desde el hombro. El contrato -por 70 millones de dólares y que involucra a la empresa Zhongqing Baoshang International Investment, con sede en Hong Kong– es para adquirir 400 sistemas de defensa aérea portátiles, incluidos misiles QW-12 y FN-16 de fabricación china.
En diciembre pasado, Estados Unidos aprobó la venta por 11 mil millones de dólares de un paquete de armamento para Taiwán. La isla se arma contrarreloj para prepararse para repeler un posible intento de invasión por parte de China. La operación incluye sistemas de cohetes HIMARS, obuses, misiles antitanque, drones y repuestos para otros equipos militares críticos. Pero aún el gobierno de Donald Trump no transfirió ese material a Taipei. ¿Lo hará ahora que China vendió armas al país que continúa prometiendo dar “muerte a Estados Unidos”?
Pero esta no es la primera vez que China se involucra de lleno en el conflicto que tiene como protagonistas a Estados Unidos, Irán e Israel.
El régimen de Xi reforzó la capacidad de su socio iraní para golpear activos de Estados Unidos en Medio Oriente al facilitarle datos de satélites para selección de blancos, una asistencia que, según un informe del think tank Hudson Institute, permitió a Teherán pasar de ataques que parecían fortuitos a una campaña más precisa contra radares, aviones de apoyo y sistemas de comunicaciones durante la Operación Epic Fury.
En mayo de 2026, la administración Trump sancionó a varias empresas radicadas en China por suministrar imágenes satelitales que facilitaron los ataques iraníes contra fuerzas estadounidenses. De acuerdo con la explicación oficial citada en el reporte, MizarVision difundió imágenes de código abierto sobre actividad norteamericana durante la campaña militar, Earth Eye entregó imágenes directamente a Teherán y Chang Guang Satellite Technology recopiló y proveyó material sobre instalaciones militares estadounidenses y aliadas.
El informe sitúa el origen de esa cooperación varios años antes. En 2024, la Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica habría establecido vínculos con Chang Guang y con MinoSpace Technology para asegurarse respaldo de inteligencia espacial. Ambas compañías operan dentro del ecosistema comercial chino vinculado al Estado y fabrican satélites avanzados de observación remota alineados con las prioridades estratégicas de Beijing.
Chang Guang produce pequeños cube-sats equipados con imágenes de alta resolución. La firma MinoSpace fabrica los satélites de observación terrestre de la serie Taijing. De acuerdo con el Hudson Institute, esa cooperación podía mejorar la capacidad iraní para vigilar instalaciones militares de Estados Unidos y acelerar el desarrollo de sus blancos.
El patrón de ayuda entre ambos regímenes se profundiza ahora con la venta de armas para derribar vehículos aéreos norteamericanos.
Pero no sólo Estados Unidos toma nota sobre esta asistencia militar. Los países árabes que sufren a diario las agresiones iraníes también ven cómo desde Beijing -un socio comercial importante para muchos de ellos- se refuerza la capacidad de quien a diario dispara misiles contra instalaciones militares, edificios, infraestructura civil y aeropuertos. Baréin, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Qatar y Arabia Saudita sufren a diario estos ataques aéreos. ¿Tomarán nota de los socios de su enemigo o continuarán priorizando los negocios?
Mientras tanto, la tensión en Ormuz no se detiene. Irán continúa intentando mantener como rehén a los buques petroleros que intenten pasar por allí. La Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica interceptó y forzó la detención de tres petroleros en el estrecho. Muchos de esos busques también llevan banderas árabes. China también sabe eso. Y alimenta la maquinaria de guerra que lo hace posible.
X: @TotiPI
corresponsal:Director de Infobae América
INTERNACIONAL
China, Russia, Iran and North Korea form ‘axis of aggressors’ that could overwhelm US, book warns
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are acting as a strategically aligned bloc even without a formal mutual-defense treaty, according to a new Foundation for Defense of Democracies book warning that their cooperation could leave the United States confronting multiple crises simultaneously.
The book, «Axis of Aggressors: Countering the Cooperation of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea,» examines how the four authoritarian governments support one another across military, economic, cyber and technology domains.
Its authors acknowledge that the grouping is not a NATO-style alliance. It has no unified command, comprehensive defense commitment or complete trust among its members. But they argue that its practical effects are already visible in active conflicts.
TRUMP TO CONFRONT XI AT HIGH-STAKES SUMMIT OVER CHINA BACKING FOR IRAN, RUSSIA
In this pool photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Russiain President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un walk before a military parade marking the 80th anniversary of victory over Japan and the end of World War II in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3, 2025. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is seen at left in the background. (Sergey Bobylev / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)
«I just got back from a couple of weeks in Ukraine, and when I’m sitting in Ukraine, it’s really obvious to me that Ukraine is fighting Russia, North Korea, Iran and China,» retired Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, one of the book’s three authors, told Fox News Digital.
Montgomery pointed to North Korean ammunition and troops, Iranian drones and production expertise, and Chinese economic and technological support for Moscow.
«China is backstopping the whole thing, providing the economic backstop to Russia’s economy so they can survive this four-year catastrophic event for Russia,» Montgomery said. «They’re providing microelectronics that we see in ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles.»
The book’s researchers documented 616 instances of security cooperation among the four governments from Jan. 1, 2019, through Dec. 31, 2025, including arms transfers, weapons development, military exercises, intelligence sharing and military exchanges.
A ‘simultaneity problem’ for the U.S.
The central danger, Montgomery said, is what the book calls the «simultaneity problem.»
«We don’t get to handle these with a singularity anymore. We have to handle this with a simultaneity,» he said. «And I don’t think we can handle two problems at once, much less three or four.»
During a potential confrontation between China and Taiwan, Montgomery said, North Korea could threaten South Korea or conduct limited attacks intended to pin down U.S. forces. A conflict involving Russia and NATO’s Baltic members could be accompanied by Iranian terrorism or other hostile activity.
THREE KEY REASONS WHY AMERICA CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE TAIWAN TO COMMUNIST CHINA
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, greets Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi prior to their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, June 23, 2025. (Alexander Kazakov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)
The book identifies China-Russia military cooperation as the axis’s most consequential bilateral relationship. Chinese dual-use products have helped sustain Russia’s defense industrial base, while Moscow is transferring technology and battlefield lessons that could assist China in a Pacific conflict.
North Korea has supplied Russia with millions of artillery rounds, ballistic missiles and troops, while Moscow has assisted Pyongyang’s missile, space, drone and nuclear programs, according to the book.
Iran has provided Russia with drones and production knowledge. The book warns that Russian and Chinese assistance could also help Tehran rebuild military capabilities damaged during its conflicts with Israel and the United States.
«The longer they can entangle the United States, whether it was in Ukraine or in Iran, China and Russia are the primary beneficiaries,» Montgomery said.
Officers and soldiers aboard the Chinese People’s Liberation Army PLA Navy’s guided-missile destroyer Nanning wave as the ship enters the waters of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in south China, July 2, 2026. (Ji Peng/Xinhua via Getty Images)
China bankrolls the axis
Economic ties underpin the military cooperation, according to co-author Elaine Dezenski, who described the four-country economy as a «fractured alignment.»
«These four players are bound together more by necessity than they are by a specific trust or shared strategy among them,» Dezenski told Fox News Digital. «China needs energy. Russia and Iran need buyers for their oil and gas. And North Korea needs any lifeline that it can get.»
China purchases discounted Russian and Iranian energy while providing goods, technology and access to its domestic market.
The relationships remain unequal. Russia and Iran compete to sell similar products, while China can seek other suppliers. But Dezenski said those divisions should not obscure the benefits the cooperation provides.
«The economics of this very much underpin the foundations for the military engagement that we see,» she said.
The book says China purchases as much as 95% of Iran’s oil exports. Some sanctioned oil is routed through third countries, relabeled or processed by independent Chinese refineries known as «teapots.»
«The export juggernaut that is China today is fueled by sanctioned oil and gas,» Dezenski said.
TRUMP MAY CLAIM HE WON THE FIGHT WITH IRAN, BUT THERE’S A BIGGER WAR ALREADY UNDERWAY
In this Aug. 13, 2007, file photo, a convoy of Chinese APCs rolls by during a rehearsal for a massive joint military exercise by the two former Cold War rivals, the first on Russia’s territory in the Chelyabinsk region in Russia’s Ural Mountains. Chinese and Russian military forces are engaged in joint exercises through Friday, Aug. 13, 2021, in northwestern China as ties grow between the two autocratic states amid uncertainty over instability in Afghanistan. (AP Photo, File)
New payment networks challenge U.S. leverage
Dezenski also warned that China, Russia and Iran are developing payment systems outside traditional Western banking infrastructure. More trade is being settled in yuan through China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, or CIPS, potentially reducing Washington’s ability to enforce sanctions through the dollar system.
«We need to really think about that sooner rather than later, before this alternative payment system becomes too big to tackle,» Dezenski said.
Cyber ties blur the state-criminal line
Montgomery said the line between criminal hackers and government operatives is often deliberately blurred in all four countries.
«These regimes routinely outsource work to criminal groups to keep their own hands clean, and those groups are increasingly networking with each other,» he said.
The book cites ties involving Iranian cybercriminals and Russian ransomware groups, Chinese actors on Russian dark-web forums, and Russian and North Korean state-backed hackers using shared operational infrastructure.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, right, examine a launch pad of Soyuz rockets during their meeting at the Vostochny cosmodrome outside the city of Tsiolkovsky, about 125 miles from the city of Blagoveshchensk in the far eastern Amur region of Russia, on Sept. 13, 2023. North Korean leader Kim hailed the country’s relationship with Russia on June 12, 2024, as reports suggest that Russian President Putin will soon visit the isolated country for his third meeting with Kim. (Mikhail Metzel, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)
Outside experts see an integrated threat
Carrie Filipetti, executive director of the Vandenberg Coalition and a former State Department official during the first Trump administration, said drone warfare demonstrates how assistance moves among the countries.
«Chinese components are used to create Iranian drones, which are then deployed by the Russians against Ukrainian civilians,» Filipetti told Fox News Digital.
She said the relationship has also endangered American troops, pointing to the January 2024 Tower 22 attack in Jordan, which killed three U.S. Army Reserve soldiers and wounded more than 40 service members.
«The military and ideological relationship between Russia and Iran is not just a theoretical threat to the United States — American service members have been killed as a result of it,» Filipetti said.
Filipetti said the attack used an Iranian drone and Russian tactics developed during the war in Ukraine. «These adversaries don’t agree on everything, but they do on one thing: to reorient the world away from America and the West,» she said. «Our service members and citizens will continue to suffer until we treat the threat as the united threat it is.»
Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Richard Newton said the danger stems not only from military modernization in each country, but from the degree to which the four governments are increasingly coordinating.
«I couldn’t agree more with the underlying findings the authors present regarding the rapid military modernization unfolding across multiple domains — air, sea, land, space and cyber — emanating from China, Russia, Iran and North Korea,» Newton told Fox News Digital.
A billboard depicting Iran’s supreme leaders since 1979: (L to R) Ayatollahs Ruhollah Khomeini (until 1989), Ali Khamenei (until 2026), and Mojtaba Khamenei (incumbent) is displayed above a highway in Tehran on March 10, 2026. Iran marked the appointment of Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei to replace his father as its supreme leader on March 9, 2026. (AFP/Via Getty Images)
«These nation-states represent extraordinary adversarial challenges for the United States. That’s concerning enough,» he said. «But a major challenge President Trump is facing in his second administration is the level and degree of integration, synchronization and coordination among these four adversaries, who are more unified today than ever in their collective pursuits to threaten U.S. national security interests.»
Newton said the changing character of warfare, demonstrated by more than four years of fighting between Russia and Ukraine and the current U.S.-Iran conflict, has compounded the threat.
«Couple that with the changing nature of warfare we’ve been witnessing,» he said, «and the task to defend our nation is now much more complex and daunting.»
Retired Air Force Gen. Philip Breedlove, who served as NATO supreme allied commander and commander of U.S. European Command from 2013 to 2016, argued that Washington’s language understates the severity of the confrontation.
«We often say that we are in ‘strategic competition’ with China and Russia. They are at war with us,» Breedlove told Fox News Digital.
Breedlove said China, Russia, Iran and North Korea «are not partners looking for cooperation with the U.S.,» but governments seeking to «diminish and defeat» American power.
«The enemy gets a vote,» Breedlove said. «Our enemies are voting by their support to Russia and Iran.»
He added that assistance from the other countries has become increasingly important to Moscow as it struggles to sustain its war.
«Aid is critical to Russia,» Breedlove said. «Russia is failing and becoming ever more dependent on its allies.»
The authors recommend stronger coordination with allies, expanded defense production, greater protection of U.S. critical infrastructure and more aggressive sanctions enforcement.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The war in Iran has pushed China and Russia closer together. (Sergei Guneev/Reuters)
Dezenski called for targeting the full network supporting sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil, including refineries, ports, insurers and financiers, rather than focusing primarily on individual vessels.
«We need to treat this axis as a threat, as a combined threat,» Montgomery said, «that will confront us in every one of our crisis areas.»
national security, china, foreign affairs, russia, war with iran, north korea
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Dr. Anthony Fauci ran point as the COVID-19 explainer-in-chief under two different administrations, steering policy and messaging on the virus that rattled the country and world for years.
But there is one thing in all of his media appearances, profiles, interviews and congressional hearings that Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., contended Fauci never said: that he was sorry.
«I mean, I’d like to hear him say he’s sorry,» Paul said. «Can he say he is sorry for funding — the research was dangerous research in China? Almost everybody agrees with that.»
EXCLUSIVE: BIDEN PARDON WON’T SHIELD FAUCI IF HE LIES TO CONGRESS, COMER SAYS
Dr. Anthony Fauci, former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, arrives to testify before the House Oversight and Accountability Committee Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic at the Rayburn House Office Building on June 3, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (Getty Images)
«Now he says, ‘Oh, well, it didn’t meet this definition or this definition, it was dangerous research,» he continued. «It was a judgment error. It was a profound judgment error.»
Paul and Fauci are set to square off Wednesday morning in the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the panel that Paul leads, in a clash that has been years in the making.
In the lead up to Wednesday’s hearing, Paul unveiled over 1,000 pages of Fauci’s diary, providing his own color commentary online about Fauci’s motivations leading up to and during the pandemic.
WATCH: RAND PAUL SAYS FAUCI LOBBIED FOR $1M PRIZE WHILE LEADING COVID RESPONSE
The lawmaker has had his sights set on Fauci since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and accused him of funding research in China that led to the eventual outbreak of the virus.
And though Fauci has been out of the public spotlight since 2022, when he stepped down from his role as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the two will finally get the chance to square up and settle the feud.
«I think he actually could do better in the hearing if he’d come forward and apologize for funding this research,» Paul said. «No one’s ever heard an apology from him. All they hear is sort of the idea that he never did anything wrong and that there’s nothing wrong with that.»
HARVARD TOPS NATION IN FOREIGN CASH HAUL AS COTTON DEMANDS PROBE INTO CHINA FUNDING
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., leads the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Paul has said that the former chief medical advisor to the president deserves to be in prison for his alleged role in funding gain-of-function research, and warned that his pardon from former President Joe Biden wouldn’t hold up.
Notably, Fauci’s former top advisor at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. David Morens, was indicted by the Justice Department earlier this year on charges of allegedly conspiring to evade public records laws, hide communications regarding the origins of COVID-19, and destroy federal records.
Gain-of-function research, or work that enhances a virus’s transmissibility or lethality, and Fauci’s alleged role in funding that type of research through his position at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China has been Paul’s focal point for years in his crusade against the former COVID-19 czar.
And he argued that the issue of researching the spread of a virus, or its killing potential, predates the pandemic.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Paul charged that in 2010, research conducted by Ron Fouchier, a Dutch virologist, produced a version of H5N1, commonly known as bird flu, that was transmissible «through the air between mammals.»
«And half the scientific community said, ‘Oh my God, this could be the end of the world. We’re doing this s—,’» Paul said.
«And Fauci was on the other side, and he said at the time in a Washington Post op-ed that even if a pandemic should occur from a scientist being bitten or somehow infected, the knowledge is worth the risk,» he continued. «That needs to be debated by the country. Is the knowledge of creating viruses that could kill the world worth the risks? And I don’t think it is.»
politics, rand paul, anthony fauci, senate elections, china
China quiere que la guerra se eternice en Medio Oriente y multiplica su ayuda al régimen de Irán
El canciller confirmó que planea viajar a China junto a Luis Caputo y Karina Milei para avanzar con negociaciones comerciales
Barcola quiere volar a Liverpool
China, Russia, Iran and North Korea form ‘axis of aggressors’ that could overwhelm US, book warns
Creció la oferta de frutas importadas en las verdulerías: cuáles son las que más llegan y por qué
Quirno se refirió a la tensión con Brasil y dio detalles de la visita de la titular del FMI
Crisis entre Milei y Lula: la trama política, personal y geopolítica detrás del mayor choque diplomático entre Argentina y Brasil
Cuentapropismo emocional en lo profundo del conurbano
Joaquín Furriel contó cómo fue ver la final del Mundial con su novia española: “Una situación incómoda”
San Isidro: la ballena que quedó varada en un banco de arena murió pese al operativo de rescate
POLITICA2 días agoCrisis entre Milei y Lula: la trama política, personal y geopolítica detrás del mayor choque diplomático entre Argentina y Brasil
- SOCIEDAD3 días ago
San Isidro: la ballena que quedó varada en un banco de arena murió pese al operativo de rescate
- POLITICA3 días ago
Milei cruzó al aire a De Mendiguren, exministro de Duhalde: “Vos, sí, ladrón”
