INTERNACIONAL
Reporter’s Notebook: Tlaib forces rare House procedure after Republican accuses her of defending terrorists

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
«Words taken down.»
That term of art may not mean much off Capitol Hill. But it’s a phrase which usually signals there’s a ruckus in the House of Representatives.
The House witnessed one such melee recently. Lawmakers debated a war powers resolution for Lebanon. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., pushed the measure, hoping to restrict President Donald Trump’s conflict in Iran. Especially as other places in the region emerge as flashpoints.
Tlaib, a Palestinian-America, is one of only two Muslim women in Congress. She is one of the most controversial members of Congress. And she often speaks out against Israel.
«We must end U.S. participation in the Israeli apartheid regime’s invasion of Lebanon. The Israeli military continues to target journalists like Amal Khalil and use our tax dollars to commit war crimes,» said Tlaib.
RASHIDA TLAIB HIT WITH HOUSE CENSURE THREAT, ACCUSED OF ‘CELEBRATING TERRORISM’ IN PRO-PALESTINIAN SPEECH
Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., is pushing the federal government to recognize and enforce numerous rights for the homeless population, including the right of «freedom from harassment» from law enforcement and property owners. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
But the House floor devolved into a verbal fracas when Rep. Max Miller, R-Ohio, tore into Tlaib, attacking her personally and mentioning Hezbollah during the floor debate.
«Its members are butchers that you like to hang out with to a certain extent,» charged Miller, who is Jewish. «Yes, you advocate for terrorists on a daily basis. You advocate for a terrorist regime every single day.»
Tlaib hollered at Miller from across the chamber, but it wasn’t clear what she said since the Michigan Democrat wasn’t on mic.
«Oh, I’m sorry. Are we getting a little emotional?» chided Miller.
Tlaib erupted, at that, shouting even more loudly at Miller.
Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., presided over the debate from the dais. Obernolte had enough of the verbal judo and slammed down the gavel.
«Colleagues, this is a serious topic. We will debate it respectfully and deliberately,» admonished Obernolte. «Is the gentlewoman from Michigan making a motion?»
NANCY MACE CHALLENGES DEM REP TO ‘TAKE IT OUTSIDE’ AFTER ‘CHILD, LISTEN’ COMMENT SPARKS CHAOS

Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., attends a House Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands hearing on the 9/11 Memorial and Museum Act and other legislation in the Longworth Building on Dec. 7, 2021. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images)
Tlaib had made it to one of the mics in the chamber by this point.
«Yes, Mr. Speaker, I am. That is a direct attack on my character. I please request to strike the words down,» said Tlaib.
And there it was. «Words taken down.»
Tlaib may have garbled the precise verbiage of the parliamentary request. But her motion brought debate on the war powers resolution and all other business before the House to a screeching halt.
«The gentleman from Ohio will be seated,» Obernolte instructed Miller.
In effect, Tlaib’s motion is the parliamentary equivalent of pulling someone over for speeding. You might get a ticket. Maybe not. Especially if you’re cooperative with the officer. But the authorities will first investigate. And that’s what unfolded on the House floor.
During this stasis, the House conducts no business. The House suspends speeches. Amendments. Votes. Nothing happens on the floor until they figure out if someone broke the rules.
The phrase «words taken down» refers to the process of the House’s institutional staff and stenographers to document or «take down» language uttered by a member that may violate House rules. The House prohibits members from personal attacks on fellow lawmakers, impugning the motives of their colleagues or «engaging in personalities.» One member can’t disparage another personally.
Tlaib clearly believed that Miller broke House rules by saying she would «like to hang out» and «advocate for terrorists.» Tlaib also believed the line about her «getting a little emotional» may have crossed the line, too.
‘SQUAD’ MEMBER DELIVERS REAL-TIME WHITEBOARD RESPONSES TO TRUMP: ‘NO KING!’

Rep. Max Miller, R-Ohio, said he stood by his remarks associating Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., with Hezbollah «butchers.» (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
If it’s pretty clear that a member broke the rules of decorum, someone from leadership or key staff may ask offending lawmaker to withdraw the language in question and apologize. But if the member resists, the House has no alternative but to rule that member out of order. The House then expunges the speech and he or she is suspended from speaking on the House floor the rest of the day.
If the chair rules that member violated the rules, it’s possible that someone could appeal the ruling of the chair. That would entail a roll call vote, where the entire House votes yes or no on whether they believe their colleague broke the rules. Or, another member might move to «table the appeal of the ruling of the chair.» In that scenario, the House votes on whether to kill or set aside the appeal. Thus, the vote is a step removed from actually voting on appealing the chair’s ruling.
After an hour of delay, it was clear that Miller wouldn’t apologize or withdraw his statement.
«The words of the gentleman from Ohio contain an allegation that the gentlewoman from Michigan is a ‘butcher’ and affiliated with a terrorist organization,» said Obernolte. «Such remarks impugn the patriotism and loyalty of the member of the House.»
Obernolte added that «the remarks contain personalities and are not in order. Without objection, the offending words are stricken from the record.»
So the House sanctioned Miller for breaking the rules and benched him for the remainder of the day.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast, R-Fla., managed the Lebanon war powers debate on the floor for the GOP. Since the House muted Miller, Mast spoke on his behalf.
«I’m going to deliver a message from Rep. Miller of Ohio,» said Mast, who quoted this Republican colleague. «‘Yes, I said it. I own it. And I stand by it.’»
CHAOS ERUPTS DURING IMMIGRATION HEARING AS DEMOCRAT LUNGES AT CHAIRMAN’S GAVEL: ‘I’M TIRED OF YOU’ ‘

Rep. Brian Mast, R-Fla., said supporters of the Lebanon war powers resolution are acting as «proxies for Hezbollah.» (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)
The Florida Republican then asked the House if he could submit for the record an article entitled ‘Rashida Talib, member of secret Facebook Group where Hamas Terrorists glorified.’»
Tlaib objected.
Mast then tried to submit into the record a transcript about Tlaib allegedly speaking about genocide.
Tlaib objected to that as well.
Yours truly first encountered a parliamentary donnybrook like this in 1994 while working at C-SPAN. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., tangled with then-Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y. The House ruled Waters out of order. Then-House Speaker Tom Foley, D-Wash., came to the floor to mete out the punishment, not leaving the umpiring to a more junior lawmaker.
The day after the Tlaib/Miller brouhaha, Obernolte released a bipartisan framework to help establish guardrails for AI.
I pressed Obernolte on how an AI chatbot might handle the dust-up if it were presiding over the House.
«AI is actually very good at this. You give it a rules manual and then you give it a specific instance and say ‘Is this in compliance with rules or is this a violation of the rules?’» said Obernolte. «I think last night was obviously someone engaging in personalities. And, I think I made the correct ruling. I think AI would have also made the correct ruling.»
It wasn’t that long ago that the actual Speaker of the House came to the floor to sort out a kerfuffle between two members. Could the House ever delegate such refereeing to AI?
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Taking down words? Ruling members out of order? Suspending members for additional speeches that day if they get out of line?
One can imagine that members will say a lot of words worthy of being taken down if AI ever becomes the parliamentary umpire in the House of Representatives.
congress, politics, wars, foreign policy senate, house of representatives politics, rashida tlaib
INTERNACIONAL
Francia celebra el Día de la Bastilla con un tradicional desfile militar, Zelensky como invitado de honor y un amplio respaldo a Ucrania

El presidente de Francia, Emmanuel Macron, encabeza este martes su décimo y último desfile militar por el Día de la Bastilla como jefe de Estado, con su par de Ucrania, Volodimir Zelensky, como invitado de honor y una fuerte presencia de tropas que respaldan a Kiev frente a la invasión rusa. La ceremonia también incluyó un homenaje a las víctimas del atentado terrorista de Niza, al cumplirse diez años del ataque que dejó 86 muertos.
El tradicional desfile sobre la avenida de los Campos Elíseos, que conmemora la toma de la Bastilla del 14 de julio de 1789, comenzará alrededor de las 10:00 hora local. La ceremonia reunirá a unos 500 soldados de la denominada Coalición de los Voluntarios, integrada por países que apoyan a Ucrania, además de unos 25 militares ucranianos, que desfilaron detrás de las tropas de los Estados miembros de esa alianza.
La participación de efectivos ucranianos y de países aliados se produce un día después de la reunión de los líderes de la coalición en París. Francia y el Reino Unido impulsan desde el año pasado este grupo de naciones dispuesto a participar en una eventual fuerza multinacional liderada por Europa una vez que exista un alto el fuego en Ucrania.
En la víspera del desfile, Macron pronunció su tradicional discurso ante las Fuerzas Armadas y defendió el compromiso europeo con la seguridad del continente. “El mensaje que enviamos al mundo es este: Sí, la paz es nuestro objetivo“, afirmó el mandatario.
El presidente francés agregó: «Sí, apreciamos la libertad y el Estado de derecho. Y sí, estamos preparados para luchar para defenderlos. Siempre, y al costo de sangre si fuera necesario“.
Desde el Palacio del Elíseo también destacaron el significado político del acto. Un integrante de la oficina presidencial sostuvo que el desfile representa «un poderoso símbolo de una Europa que toma conciencia de lo peligroso que es el mundo y que debe tomar su destino en sus propias manos“.
La ceremonia transcurre bajo una intensa ola de calor que afectó a gran parte de Francia. Decenas de miles de personas asistirán a las celebraciones en el centro de París, mientras un incendio forestal avanza en las afueras de la capital y las autoridades prohibieron los fuegos artificiales en varias zonas del país debido al riesgo de nuevos focos.
Además del desfile militar y del espectáculo aéreo, la jornada nacional francesa concluirá con otro acontecimiento de gran expectativa: el partido entre Francia y España por las semifinales del Mundial de fútbol. La selección francesa busca regresar a una final después de conquistar el título en 2018 y perder la definición de 2022 frente a Argentina.
Antes del encuentro deportivo, Macron dispuso realizar un minuto de silencio en memoria de las víctimas de los atentados yihadistas que golpearon al país hace una década.
El homenaje recordará el ataque ocurrido el 14 de julio de 2016 en la ciudad mediterránea de Niza, cuando un conductor embistió con un camión a la multitud que abandonaba el espectáculo de fuegos artificiales por el Día de la Bastilla. El atentado provocó 86 muertos y más de 400 heridos.
El grupo yihadista Estado Islámico reivindicó posteriormente al atacante, un ciudadano tunecino de 31 años identificado como Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel, que murió por disparos de la policía en el lugar del ataque.

El atentado de Niza ocurrió menos de un año después de los ataques coordinados del 13 de noviembre de 2015 en París y sus alrededores, que dejaron 130 muertos y constituyeron el peor ataque terrorista en tiempos de paz registrado en Francia.
La edición de este año también marca el último desfile del 14 de Julio para Macron antes del final de su segundo mandato consecutivo, el máximo permitido por la Constitución francesa. El presidente dejará el cargo el próximo año y el escenario político ya apunta a las próximas elecciones presidenciales.
En ese contexto, la líder de la derecha nacional, Marine Le Pen, mantiene su intención de competir por cuarta vez por la Presidencia, pese a una condena por malversación de fondos.
(Con información de AFP)
anniversaries,defence
INTERNACIONAL
Democratic socialists erupt over 2028 endorsement as AOC speculation grows: ‘Dangerous path’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Infighting has erupted within the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) about the selection of its pick for U.S. president, as the group’s influence continues to grow on the national stage and speculation swirls about a 2028 presidential run by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
The infighting reveals fractures in the roughly 120,000-member group, which has emerged as the preeminent socialist group in America. The division also sheds light on how some Democratic Socialists of America members believe the group can gain a permanent foothold in American politics and deliver on its socialist ideals on a national scale.
Some Democratic Socialists of America leaders have been pushing for an earlier presidential endorsement in place of the group’s normal practice of selecting endorsements at its biennial national convention, which is set for summer 2027.
One faction known as the «Groundwork» caucus is pushing strongly for the group to conduct a national member poll and «endorse AOC on day one.» The caucus believes an early endorsement will help DSA hold a more influential early role in 2028 presidential politics and «build power for socialism.»
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA LEADER SAYS ‘MANY’ IN GROUP WOULD BE ‘THRILLED’ AT AOC IN 2028
In one online petition, DSA members voiced that «if we don’t have a member poll, we as members will be left out of DSA’s most fundamental way of building a democratic strategy.»
However, in a Sunday 14–13 vote, DSA’s National Political Committee (NPC) rejected a proposal to allow the group’s 2028 presidential endorsement to be decided through a nationwide all-member poll, according to Canary Mission. By rejecting the proposal, the committee left the issue to DSA’s existing convention process, meaning any national endorsement decision would likely wait until the organization’s next convention in August 2027.
The decision was blasted by many DSA members online.
Gustavo Gordillo, co-chair of the group’s New York City chapter, posted on X that «DSA’s national leadership (the NPC) just voted to overturn our convention & took away rank and file members’ right to vote in an all-member poll on presidential endorsement.»
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., sparked rumors she is considering a run for president after posting a campaign-style video on social media. (Steven Ferdman/GC Images)
Gordillo added that the committee is «taking away our members’ right to vote» while NYC-DSA, the group’s largest chapter, is «send(ing) them ~ $2M per year in dues.»
Likewise, J. Ryder, founding editor of a magazine on communism, wrote that the committee’s decision «to suppress polling the will of the members on presidential endorsement is severely disappointing.»
Ryder added that «this will inevitably put DSA on the back foot in the 2028 moment,» writing, «Waiting to endorse in August of next year at the convention may mean 6 months+ of vital AOC campaign time where the masses will be mobilizing without intervention by DSA.»
«The worst part is, the members want to mobilize, they see the opportunity that this moment represents for socialism and want so desperately to grasp it,» he added. «The fact the (sic) some sectarians on the NPC are suppressing even a non-binding poll shows that they know this, and are scared of the implications of member democracy and mass politics in DSA.»
In response, committee member Amy Wilhelm fired back at Gordillo, posting on X that «NYC members deserve co-chairs that don’t lie.»
Wilhelm said that «there was never intention to prevent» DSA members from participating in chapter polls, and that «with the resolution where we left it today chapters are allowed to carry out the poll per their standard method.»
Likewise, another X user who goes by the name «tylerisposting» blasted Gordillo, telling him in an X post to «stop lying» and «stop trying to foment a split.»
Meanwhile, Eve Seitchik, a Massachusetts DSA member, characterized the events of the day as «a massive escalation of factional tensions,» adding, «I’m afraid DSA has been set down a dangerous path.»
SOCIALISTS LAUNCH RADICAL PLATFORM TO ABOLISH THE US SENATE IN BID TO FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA

Members of the Democratic Socialists of America gather outside of a Trump owned building during a May Day rally in New York City in 2019. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
The authors posited that DSA’s recent electoral wins and Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., «Fight Oligarchy» tour «have shown that there is energy all across the country to support a bold, democratic socialist presidential campaign.»
They argued that «DSA should be ready to position ourselves as the political home for the millions of people that will be inspired by AOC’s message and position our organization as the vital core of AOC’s campaign.»
They wrote that Ocasio-Cortez is «on the precipice of running for — and potentially winning — the presidency of the United States» and that «this opportunity is years in the making.»
«If we drag our feet,» they wrote, «we will have forced ourselves into the backseat and miss the opportunity to strike when the iron is hot.»
The four-term congresswoman has not directly said whether she will launch a presidential run in 2028. Rumors are also circulating about her opting to instead run for the Senate to topple Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
Though Ocasio-Cortez is considered one of the most prominent socialists in the country and a close ally of Sanders, she has run afoul of DSA leadership several times.
In summer 2025, the group issued a statement condemning Ocasio-Cortez’s vote against an amendment to block additional funding for Israel’s «Iron Dome,» which would have denied Israel an additional $500 million in U.S. funding for its preeminent missile defense system. In 2024, the DSA withdrew its endorsement for Ocasio-Cortez’s re-election, citing that she had not met its conditions, including opposing all funding to Israel and publicly supporting boycott and sanctions for the country.
DSA’s New York City chapter notably retained its endorsement for Ocasio-Cortez.
AOC TAKES PAGE FROM BIDEN PLAYBOOK IN DODGING INTERVIEWS WITH NATIONAL PRESS

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speak to a full auditorium as part of the «Fighting Oligarchy» tour on April 14, 2025, in Nampa, Idaho. According to event organizers, 12,500 people attended the rally. (Natalie Behring/Getty Images)
Commenting on DSA’s deliberations, a spokesperson for Canary Mission told Fox News Digital that «an AOC presidency would give that movement more than influence: it would give its agenda access to the full power of the executive branch.»
The spokesperson added that «putting that power in the hands of a movement that repeatedly places ideological allegiance above America’s national interests, regards America and its allies as the problem, and shows sympathy toward their adversaries would not be political progress. It would be a profound national-security risk—and could be devastating for the country.»
«DSA presents its agenda as a project of reconstruction, but much of its politics begins with dismantling the institutions, alliances, and economic system that sustain those achievements,» the spokesperson said, adding, «For more than a decade, Canary Mission has documented numerous instances in which anti-Zionist activism has crossed into antisemitic harassment, support for extremism, and hostility toward the United States and its democratic allies.»
«As these ideas have moved from activist circles into mainstream politics, DSA has emerged as the primary vehicle through which radical ideology is translated into political success,» said the spokesperson.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Canary Mission keeps its representatives unnamed for security reasons.
Fox News Digital reached out to Ocasio-Cortez’s office and DSA for comment.
alexandria ocasio cortez, democratic party, bernie sanders, presidential, elections, socialism
INTERNACIONAL
La guerra con Rusia: Europa construirá con Ucrania su propio sistema antimisiles para no depender de Estados Unidos

La cumbre de la semana pasada de la OTAN en Ankara se consideró un éxito porque al menos el presidente estadounidense Donald Trump no rompió los platos. Pero apenas se tomaron decisiones.
Por eso pocos días después, los principales países europeos se reunieron en París este lunes para empezar a tomar decisiones sobre la defensa europea sin Estados Unidos. Entre ellas la formación de una coalición de nueve países que desarrollará capacidades europeas contra misiles balísticos independientes de las estadounidenses.
Alemania, Dinamarca, España, Francia, Italia, Países Bajos, Noruega, Suecia y Ucrania firmaron una declaración conjunta para poner en marcha ese sistema antimisiles. Aseguran en un texto común que “conscientes de la amenaza creciente que suponen los misiles balísticos y de la importancia de las capacidades de defensa para la seguridad del continente europeo, anunciamos la creación de una coalición puramente defensiva contra los misiles balísticos”. La noticia no es que vayan a desarrollar esas capacidades, sino que lo hagan sin Washington.
La participación de Ucrania en el grupo es el reconocimiento al desarrollo militar del país durante la guerra. Ucrania se ha convertido en estos años en la primera potencia militar europea si no se tienen en cuenta las capacidades nucleares de Francia y el Reino Unido. El país tiene en armas y entrenados a más de medio millón de hombres cuando nadie en Europa llega a 300.000, la inmensa mayoría si el entrenamiento de los ucranianos. El desarrollo es tal que hay fila de la industria militar europea para firmar acuerdos de colaboración con la ucraniana.
El texto de este acuerdo asegura que “poniendo en común nuestra base industrial de defensa, nuestra investigación y nuestra experiencia operativa, nuestro objetivo es construir una capacidad compartida contra los misiles balísticos para Europa. Esta acción no va contra nadie, sino para nuestra defensa”. El texto “saluda la experiencia única de Ucrania, adquirida por su defensa frente a la guerra de agresión de Rusia”.
El cónclave en París sirvió para que la Unión Europea y el Reino Unido firmaran el acuerdo para la participación británica en el préstamo de 90.000 millones de euros que la UE aprobó a principios de la primavera boreal. Un tercio va a sostener los gastos del Estado ucraniano y dos tercios para que Kiev compre armas.
El Reino Unido había exigido participar porque la plata se le presta a Ucrania con la condición de que las armas que compre sean europeas y Londres no quería dejar a su industria militar fuera del negocio. A Europa también le interesaba el pacto por la industria militar británica complementa a la europea.
A cambio, asegura la carta de intenciones que da pie al acuerdo, “el Reino Unido contribuirá con una parte justa y proporcional de los costes del endeudamiento, que tendrá en cuenta el valor de los contratos que se lleven las empresas británicas”. Nadie espera que Kiev devuelva ese dinero. Sólo lo haría si Rusia pagara reparaciones de guerra.
La reunión de este lunes en París debió servir también para que varios gobiernos europeos se comprometieran con el presidente ucraniano Volodimir Zelenski para enviarle parte de sus baterías Patriot antimisiles balísticos. Son de fabricación estadounidense y muy preciadas, pero Washington ya dijo a los europeos que no enviará más, que envíen ellos las suyas. La mirada se posa sobre todo en Grecia (reticente por su sempiterna rencilla con Turquía) y en España, que tendría varias unidades disponibles. Precisamente una batería Patriot española protege el flanco suroriental turco.
Esos compromisos son discretos porque nadie quiere desvelar el número real de esos instrumentos en sus arsenales.
El Kremlin criticó esa reunión alegando que sólo busca alargar la guerra. Los reunidos alegan desde hace cuatro años que lo que buscan es que Ucrania se defienda de una agresión no provocada y que apoyarán lo que Ucrania apoye.
Europa también señaló este lunes a los servicios de inteligencia rusos como organizadores desde hace años de multitud de ciberataques contra objetivos europeos. La UE apunta al FSB (antiguo KGB), anunció sanciones contra individuos y entidades. A la vez, el Reino Unido anunciaba medidas similares. Varias capitales convocaron a los embajadores rusos y la OTAN aseguró que responderá a las amenazas.
La canciller europea, Kaja Kallas, dijo en Bruselas: “Los ciberataques rusos están aumentando en magnitud y gravedad. Por primera vez, la UE y el Reino Unido imponen simultáneamente sanciones al ecosistema más amplio que permite estos ataques, incluidos delincuentes, hacktivistas y empresas que operan a instancias de Moscú”.
DEPORTE2 días ago“Hablame bien”: el tenso cruce de Lionel Messi con el árbitro en la victoria de Argentina ante Suiza en el Mundial
CHIMENTOS1 día agoEl álbum de las vacaciones soñadas de Darío Barassi con su familia: “Ibiza, nos vas enamorando”
ECONOMIA1 día agoEl petróleo sube más de 3% tras la reanudación de los ataques de EEUU contra Irán y la amenaza de cierre del estrecho de Ormuz
















