Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Bolivia: los cocaleros de Evo Morales se radicalizan para exigir la renuncia de Rodrigo Paz

Published

on


Imagen referencial de un punto de bloqueo en Bolivia, 11 de mayo de 2026. REUTERS/Claudia Morales TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Las seis federaciones de cocaleros afines al exmandatario Evo Morales (2006-2019) anunciaron este domingo la radicalización de las medidas de presión para exigir la renuncia del presidente Rodrigo Paz.

La determinación, asumida en una reunión “de emergencia” entre sus afiliados, surge en rechazo al operativo de desbloqueo en el municipio cruceño de San Julián el sábado, donde al menos 33 personas —entre ellas seis policías— resultaron heridas y se reportó el uso de armas de fuego entre civiles.

Advertisement

“El Gobierno no tiene la capacidad para manejar Bolivia, tiene que dar un paso al costado (…) vamos a radicalizar nuestras movilizaciones”, anunció en un video el dirigente cocalero Gastón Ledezma y expresó su respaldo a las organizaciones que realizan bloqueos en otros departamentos, como la Federación de Campesinos de La Paz Túpac Katari y la Central Obrera Boliviana.

De igual forma, los cocaleros acordaron realizar una movilización masiva el miércoles 10 de junio en la región del Trópico de Cochabamba, bastión del expresidente Morales, en protesta por los recurrentes cortes del servicio eléctrico en su región.

Vista nocturna de una calle oscura en una comunidad, con personas sentadas y de pie, y una tienda con luz brillante al fondo. El cielo está nublado
Residentes en una comunidad rural del bastión de Evo Morales se agrupan en las calles y cerca de una tienda con luz limitada, tras un apagón nocturno el 28 de mayo de 2026.

“Nos han quitado servicios básicos, luz y (telecomunicaciones), son un servicio y un derecho humano”, señaló Ledezma y calificó la suspensión como un acto de “amedrentamiento” contra su sector. La Empresa de Luz y Fuerza Eléctrica de Cochabamba justificó los cortes a fallas técnicas por la caída de postes de alta tensión.

Este lunes se cumplen siete meses del Gobierno de Rodrigo y Paz y 33 días desde que comenzaron los bloqueos que tienen paralizada gran parte del país.

Advertisement

Los conflictos sociales iniciaron con reclamos de aumentos salariales, protestas por la escasez y mala calidad del combustible y en rechazo a varias reformas que estaba encarando el gobierno. Las protestas se intensificaron en las últimas semanas cuando sindicatos obreros, campesinos de la región occidental, cocaleros y otros sectores empezaron a exigir la renuncia del primer mandatario.

Desde entonces, las manifestaciones y los bloqueos de carreteras se han masificado y extendido por todo el país. Este lunes, la Administradora Boliviana de Carreteras reporta 84 piquetes en seis de los nueve departamentos del país.

Manifestantes contrarios al gobierno sostienen carteles pidiendo la renuncia del presidente, Rodrigo Paz, en La Paz, Bolivia, el lunes 25 de mayo de 2026. (AP Foto/Juan Karita)
Manifestantes contrarios al gobierno sostienen carteles pidiendo la renuncia del presidente, Rodrigo Paz, en La Paz, Bolivia, el lunes 25 de mayo de 2026. (AP Foto/Juan Karita)

El gobierno apostó en este tiempo por llamar al diálogo a los sectores movilizados en encuentros que nunca se concretaron e intentó habilitar “corredores humanitarios” para permitir el paso de alimentos e insumos básicos a las regiones que se encuentran sitiadas. En paralelo, el Parlamento abrogó una ley vigente desde 2020 que limitaba el estado de excepción y aprobó la madrugada del domingo otra norma para regular su implementación, que hasta ahora no ha sido promulgada por el presidente.

En medio de la creciente escasez de alimentos, medicamentos y combustible en La Paz y El Alto, las dos ciudades más afectadas por los cortes de carreteras, el gobierno de Paz enfrenta una creciente presión, especialmente entre actores políticos y representantes de sectores estratégicos afectados por los bloqueos, para asumir acciones.

Advertisement

El país parece haber llegado al punto en el que las posiciones difícilmente pueden seguir siendo las mismas”, señala este lunes el editorial del periódico boliviano El País sobre la urgencia de poner fin al conflicto. “Ni el Gobierno ni los sectores movilizados disponen ya de demasiado margen para prolongar indefinidamente una situación que erosiona la convivencia y profundiza la incertidumbre, pero desde luego es el presidente el que tiene menor margen”, agrega.

A pesar de que el tiempo corre en contra, y de que hace 13 días que el presidente Paz advirtió que “el tiempo se acaba” y dijo que haría uso de sus atribuciones constitucionales, nadie en el gobierno da señales de cuál es la estrategia para resolver la crisis ni cuáles serán los próximos pasos.



Business,Civil Conflict,Demonstrations,Riots,Top Picture,Corporate Events,South America / Central America,Civil Unrest

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Reporter’s Notebook: Tlaib forces rare House procedure after Republican accuses her of defending terrorists

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

«Words taken down.»

Advertisement

That term of art may not mean much off Capitol Hill. But it’s a phrase which usually signals there’s a ruckus in the House of Representatives.

The House witnessed one such melee recently. Lawmakers debated a war powers resolution for Lebanon. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., pushed the measure, hoping to restrict President Donald Trump’s conflict in Iran. Especially as other places in the region emerge as flashpoints.

Tlaib, a Palestinian-America, is one of only two Muslim women in Congress. She is one of the most controversial members of Congress. And she often speaks out against Israel.

Advertisement

«We must end U.S. participation in the Israeli apartheid regime’s invasion of Lebanon. The Israeli military continues to target journalists like Amal Khalil and use our tax dollars to commit war crimes,» said Tlaib.

RASHIDA TLAIB HIT WITH HOUSE CENSURE THREAT, ACCUSED OF ‘CELEBRATING TERRORISM’ IN PRO-PALESTINIAN SPEECH

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., is pushing the federal government to recognize and enforce numerous rights for the homeless population, including the right of «freedom from harassment» from law enforcement and property owners. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Advertisement

But the House floor devolved into a verbal fracas when Rep. Max Miller, R-Ohio, tore into Tlaib, attacking her personally and mentioning Hezbollah during the floor debate.

«Its members are butchers that you like to hang out with to a certain extent,» charged Miller, who is Jewish. «Yes, you advocate for terrorists on a daily basis. You advocate for a terrorist regime every single day.»

Tlaib hollered at Miller from across the chamber, but it wasn’t clear what she said since the Michigan Democrat wasn’t on mic.

Advertisement

«Oh, I’m sorry. Are we getting a little emotional?» chided Miller.

Tlaib erupted, at that, shouting even more loudly at Miller.

Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., presided over the debate from the dais. Obernolte had enough of the verbal judo and slammed down the gavel.

Advertisement

«Colleagues, this is a serious topic. We will debate it respectfully and deliberately,» admonished Obernolte. «Is the gentlewoman from Michigan making a motion?»

NANCY MACE CHALLENGES DEM REP TO ‘TAKE IT OUTSIDE’ AFTER ‘CHILD, LISTEN’ COMMENT SPARKS CHAOS

Rep. Jay Obernolte speaking at a House Natural Resources Subcommittee hearing

Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., attends a House Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands hearing on the 9/11 Memorial and Museum Act and other legislation in the Longworth Building on Dec. 7, 2021. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images)

Tlaib had made it to one of the mics in the chamber by this point.

Advertisement

«Yes, Mr. Speaker, I am. That is a direct attack on my character. I please request to strike the words down,» said Tlaib.

And there it was. «Words taken down.»

Tlaib may have garbled the precise verbiage of the parliamentary request. But her motion brought debate on the war powers resolution and all other business before the House to a screeching halt.

Advertisement

«The gentleman from Ohio will be seated,» Obernolte instructed Miller.

In effect, Tlaib’s motion is the parliamentary equivalent of pulling someone over for speeding. You might get a ticket. Maybe not. Especially if you’re cooperative with the officer. But the authorities will first investigate. And that’s what unfolded on the House floor.

During this stasis, the House conducts no business. The House suspends speeches. Amendments. Votes. Nothing happens on the floor until they figure out if someone broke the rules.

Advertisement

The phrase «words taken down» refers to the process of the House’s institutional staff and stenographers to document or «take down» language uttered by a member that may violate House rules. The House prohibits members from personal attacks on fellow lawmakers, impugning the motives of their colleagues or «engaging in personalities.» One member can’t disparage another personally.

Tlaib clearly believed that Miller broke House rules by saying she would «like to hang out» and «advocate for terrorists.» Tlaib also believed the line about her «getting a little emotional» may have crossed the line, too.

‘SQUAD’ MEMBER DELIVERS REAL-TIME WHITEBOARD RESPONSES TO TRUMP: ‘NO KING!’

Advertisement
Split of Rep. Rashida Tlaib and Rep. Max Miller

Rep. Max Miller, R-Ohio, said he stood by his remarks associating Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., with Hezbollah «butchers.» (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

If it’s pretty clear that a member broke the rules of decorum, someone from leadership or key staff may ask offending lawmaker to withdraw the language in question and apologize. But if the member resists, the House has no alternative but to rule that member out of order. The House then expunges the speech and he or she is suspended from speaking on the House floor the rest of the day.

If the chair rules that member violated the rules, it’s possible that someone could appeal the ruling of the chair. That would entail a roll call vote, where the entire House votes yes or no on whether they believe their colleague broke the rules. Or, another member might move to «table the appeal of the ruling of the chair.» In that scenario, the House votes on whether to kill or set aside the appeal. Thus, the vote is a step removed from actually voting on appealing the chair’s ruling.

After an hour of delay, it was clear that Miller wouldn’t apologize or withdraw his statement.

Advertisement

«The words of the gentleman from Ohio contain an allegation that the gentlewoman from Michigan is a ‘butcher’ and affiliated with a terrorist organization,» said Obernolte. «Such remarks impugn the patriotism and loyalty of the member of the House.»

Obernolte added that «the remarks contain personalities and are not in order. Without objection, the offending words are stricken from the record.»

So the House sanctioned Miller for breaking the rules and benched him for the remainder of the day.

Advertisement

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast, R-Fla., managed the Lebanon war powers debate on the floor for the GOP. Since the House muted Miller, Mast spoke on his behalf.

«I’m going to deliver a message from Rep. Miller of Ohio,» said Mast, who quoted this Republican colleague. «‘Yes, I said it. I own it. And I stand by it.’»

CHAOS ERUPTS DURING IMMIGRATION HEARING AS DEMOCRAT LUNGES AT CHAIRMAN’S GAVEL: ‘I’M TIRED OF YOU’ ‘

Advertisement
Rep. Brian Mast speaking on Capitol Hill

Rep. Brian Mast, R-Fla., said supporters of the Lebanon war powers resolution are acting as «proxies for Hezbollah.» (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)

The Florida Republican then asked the House if he could submit for the record an article entitled ‘Rashida Talib, member of secret Facebook Group where Hamas Terrorists glorified.’»

Tlaib objected.

Mast then tried to submit into the record a transcript about Tlaib allegedly speaking about genocide.

Advertisement

Tlaib objected to that as well.

Yours truly first encountered a parliamentary donnybrook like this in 1994 while working at C-SPAN. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., tangled with then-Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y. The House ruled Waters out of order. Then-House Speaker Tom Foley, D-Wash., came to the floor to mete out the punishment, not leaving the umpiring to a more junior lawmaker.

The day after the Tlaib/Miller brouhaha, Obernolte released a bipartisan framework to help establish guardrails for AI.

Advertisement

I pressed Obernolte on how an AI chatbot might handle the dust-up if it were presiding over the House.

«AI is actually very good at this. You give it a rules manual and then you give it a specific instance and say ‘Is this in compliance with rules or is this a violation of the rules?’» said Obernolte. «I think last night was obviously someone engaging in personalities. And, I think I made the correct ruling. I think AI would have also made the correct ruling.»

It wasn’t that long ago that the actual Speaker of the House came to the floor to sort out a kerfuffle between two members. Could the House ever delegate such refereeing to AI?

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Taking down words? Ruling members out of order? Suspending members for additional speeches that day if they get out of line?

One can imagine that members will say a lot of words worthy of being taken down if AI ever becomes the parliamentary umpire in the House of Representatives.

Advertisement

congress, politics, wars, foreign policy senate, house of representatives politics, rashida tlaib

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

¿Cuándo es incorrecto usar la IA?

Published

on



De todas las reacciones al manifiesto del Papa León XIV sobre la inteligencia artificial, desde sus defensores humanistas liberales hasta sus críticos que creen en la conciencia digital, una de las más notables es la decepción de los escépticos de la IA que piensan que el Papa no fue lo suficientemente lejos.

En un artículo para la revista Compact, Greg Conti, de la Universidad de Princeton, responde a la descripción que hace el papa de los peligros de la era de la inteligencia artificial preguntando:

Advertisement

«¿Es necesario que ya se haya declarado esa era?». ¿No podría un papa, en cambio, hacer un llamado a «una era de resistencia a la IA»?

En The Hedgehog Review, el crítico cultural Anton Barba-Kay comenta que abordar la IA como una «herramienta valiosa que requiere vigilancia», en palabras de León XIII, es como decir que «la cocaína puede ser una droga valiosa que debe inhalarse con una pizca de sal».

Mi reacción ante la intervención papal coincidía en parte con la de estos críticos.

Advertisement

Pensé que León XIII podría haber profundizado más en la extrañeza de la inteligencia artificial, en la naturaleza del desafío que supone para la excepcionalidad humana y en la razón por la que genera tantos impulsos mesiánicos y temores apocalípticos.

Pero no creo que un llamamiento papal a la resistencia masiva contra una era de IA hubiera sido apropiado para las condiciones de 2026.

Parece a la vez demasiado tarde y demasiado pronto para ese mensaje.

Advertisement

Demasiado tarde, en el sentido de que la tecnología ya ha arrasado con gran parte de la sociedad, generando demasiada riqueza e infraestructura, prometiendo demasiados beneficios a corto plazo e implicando a demasiadas instituciones como para que alguien pueda imaginar que la revolución de la IA pueda ser (como sugiere Conti) «extirpada o reprimida».

Entonces, demasiado pronto, en el sentido de que la naturaleza humana es reaccionar contra una tecnología solo cuando sus daños se vuelven innegables; respondemos mejor a los peligros manifiestos, no a las amenazas hipotéticas.

Las regulaciones que controlaron la industrialización se adaptaron a los abusos de la época; los movimientos para frenar la proliferación nuclear habrían sido muy diferentes sin la lección de Hiroshima y Nagasaki; la reciente reacción en contra del uso de teléfonos inteligentes por parte de los niños no se podría haber orquestado en 2010.

Advertisement

Sin duda, en un mundo ideal, la respuesta precedería a la amarga lección.

Pero en este mundo, tanto para el escéptico humanista de la IA como para el defensor de la seguridad que teme a Skynet, alguna versión del peligro probablemente deba ser no solo visible, sino innegable, para que el mundo actúe.

Y si el humanista es cristiano, como el papa, tiene buenas razones para confiar en que Dios nos concederá el tiempo necesario para domar, regular o incluso erradicar el Mal, en lugar de simplemente abandonarnos a la destrucción.

Advertisement

(A menos que esta sea la última tentación tecnológica de todas, en cuyo caso, ni las encíclicas ni las columnas periodísticas nos servirán de mucho).

Reacción

Esto no significa, sin embargo, que los escépticos y críticos deban quedarse de brazos cruzados esperando a que se cumplan sus peores temores.

Advertisement

Si están convencidos de los peligros existenciales de la IA, deberían abogar por una regulación gradual y una mayor concienciación política, aunque lo que realmente deseen sea una moratoria generalizada.

Del mismo modo, si temen los peligros culturales de la IA, su objetivo debería ser moralizar en términos concretos, identificar usos específicos de la tecnología que resulten particularmente vergonzosos y explicar a sus lectores cómo no usar la IA, incluso si, en cierto modo, preferirían condenar toda la pompa y las obras de esta era.

En un artículo publicado en The Atlantic, Tyler Austin Harper argumenta que algunos escépticos laicos de la IA se han sentido atraídos por pensadores religiosos como el papa precisamente por esta razón:

Advertisement

porque un lenguaje secular del daño parece inadecuado para los peligros que la IA crea para los humanos, que se identifican mejor con el lenguaje del pecado .

Si ese es el caso, el objetivo del crítico debería ser identificar el error directamente, y no simplemente lamentar el avance general de la tecnología ni justificar a las personas afectadas por las disrupciones.

No ofrezcas lamentos vagos sobre el destino de la educación superior; di que los estudiantes que utilizan la IA para hacer trampa están cometiendo un grave error.

Advertisement

No se limiten a lamentar la proliferación de prosa con influencias de Claude; digan que el novelista o ensayista que subcontrata un capítulo a la IA ha cometido lo que debería ser un crimen literario que ponga fin a su carrera.

No se limiten a preocuparse, como lo hace la encíclica del Papa, de que recibir “consejos, empatía, amistad e incluso amor” de un chatbot pueda ser “engañoso” para “usuarios menos perspicaces”.

Díganles a los católicos y a otros cristianos que tratar a un bot de IA como a una pareja es un pecado.

Advertisement

El objetivo de este tipo de condena no es impedir la gran disrupción que supone la IA, sino sentar las bases para las estructuras que construyamos después.

La contribución necesaria del crítico no es convencer mágicamente a todo el mundo de que usar la IA es incorrecto, sino convencer a algunos, luego a más, y finalmente a casi todos, de que quizás sea incorrecto usarla de esa manera .

c.2026 The New York Times Company

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Noncitizens on voter rolls in Democrat-run state exposed as RNC chair pledges secure elections

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE — Noncitizens in a key blue state were on the voter rolls for years — and some even voted in prior elections, according to documents obtained via public records request.

Advertisement

The New Jersey Republican Party (NJGOP) and the Republican National Committee (RNC) requested voter rolls from all 21 counties in the Garden State and found multiple instances of noncitizens seeking naturalization asking to be removed from the rolls, claiming they were unknowingly registered to vote. Most were registered as Democrats.

Noncitizens cannot vote in state or federal elections, and the candidates for citizenship worried that being on the rolls would disqualify them.

Rep. Mikie Sherrill casts her ballot at a polling location inside Hillside Elementary School in Montclair, N.J., on Nov. 4, 2025, during the New Jersey gubernatorial election. (John Lamparski/Bloomberg)

Advertisement

In official letters viewed by Fox News Digital from Atlantic County, Superintendent of Elections & Commissioner of Registration Maureen Bugdon certified that noncitizens came to her asking to be removed.

FOUR NONCITIZENS CHARGED WITH ILLEGALLY VOTING IN 2020, 2022 AND 2024 FEDERAL ELECTIONS IN NEW JERSEY

«Please allow this letter to confirm that on today’s date, the below referenced individual came before this office to confirm her registration and voter status,» the typical letter reads. «She relayed that she did not wish to be a New Jersey registered voter and does not understand how she became registered through the Department of Motor Vehicles, allegedly.»

Advertisement

Most of the letters confirmed that the noncitizens did not have a voting record, but not all.

One noncitizen, who the county said was removed from the rolls in 2015, voted several times in 2000 and 2001, and in the 2008 general election. Another voted in a primary election in 2005 and a municipal election in 2000.

jersey noncitizens voting

A letter showing Atlantic County Election Commissioner Maureen Bugdon certifiying that a New Jersey noncitizen was on the voter rolls and wished to be removed. (Obtained by the RNC and NJGOP)

TRUMP ADMIN BLOCKS CITIZENSHIP FOR ILLEGAL MIGRANT VOTERS

Advertisement

Other documents showed noncitizens directly asking to be removed from the rolls through a state voter registration cancellation form.

When prompted about why they wished to be removed, the vast majority of the unknowingly registered voters checked a box labeled «other» and wrote that they were not citizens.

In Atlantic County alone, Fox News Digital reviewed more than 50 documents from noncitizens attesting that they were registered to vote unknowingly.

Advertisement

OVERSIGHT GROUP SEEKS DOCS FROM WALZ’S MINNESOTA AS DOJ REBUKES VIRGINIA VOTER-ROLL MAINTENANCE

new jersey voting

A noncitizen on the New Jersey voter rolls used this removal form to request to be unregistered. (Obtained by the RNC and NJGOP)

RNC Chairman Joe Gruters says the group found hundreds of noncitizen registrants in New Jersey who are likely only the tip of the iceberg, but that New Jersey and other Democrat-run states are unwilling to disclose information about their voter registration list maintenance processes. The organization has requested that information from 48 states.

«I mean, it’s really incredible because here the Democrats are saying that, you know, noncitizens never vote, [that], this is a non-issue, but every county we’re finding people that are self-reporting now, and I’m glad we’re doing these records request because it’s really eye-opening, because this is just the people that have self-reported,» Gruters told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

«You want a democracy that’s secure and elections that are free and safe and that people can depend upon, and people have full confidence in,» he said.

Joe Gruters speaking at the RNC Winter Meeting in Santa Barbara, California

Republican National Committee Chair Joe Gruters is claiming victory over Democrat efforts to block efforts to kick noncitizens skipping out of North Carolina jury duty from the state’s voter rolls. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP)

RNC LAUNCHES MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR ELECTION INTEGRITY PUSH IN 17 STATES AHEAD OF MIDTERMS

The RNC in 2024 made a full-throated election integrity push to ensure, one that continues to this day, according to Gruters.

Advertisement

He told Fox News Digital that the group is «bringing the hammer down» and that it has «boots on the ground» across the country to ensure even more diligence in November.

«We have staffers already in 17 states working on these issues to make sure that, like I said, it goes back to having a safe and secure election that’s free and fair,» he said.

RNC GETS DAY AT SUPREME COURT TO CHALLENGE LATE-ARRIVING MAIL BALLOTS

Advertisement

Gruters is also optimistic about another RNC battle on the election integrity front.

The Supreme Court is soon set to decide on the case of Watson vs. RNC, a challenge to laws that allow ballots to be cast by mail on election day, but counted days later. The RNC’s goal is eliminate the practice, which Gruters highlighted as California continues to count ballots from Tuesday night’s primary elections almost a week after polls closed.

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas stand on stage at inauguration ceremony.

Supreme Court Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas waited to leave the stage at the conclusion of inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

He said a win in that case could be «one of our biggest election victories ever

Advertisement

«I mean, just what’s happened with [Los Angeles Mayoral Candidate] Spencer Pratt should open your eyes, and you should be sick to your stomach,» he said. «This should not be allowed in America.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Gruters said that when elections have an «open-ended target date,» it opens the doors for potential manipulation.

Advertisement

«We’re fighting hard to put an end to this, and this, like I said, this could be probably our biggest win ever from an election integrity standpoint by stopping this and making sure that election day means exactly what it says, election day.»

Democratic New Jersey Gov. Mickie Sherrill’s office did not return a request for comment. Neither did the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission or Atlantic County officials.

A spokesman for the New Jersey Department of Motor Vehicles said  it’s rare that noncitizens end up on the rolls. 

Advertisement

«MVC, together with state and local partners across New Jersey, uses rigorous processes to ensure eligible individuals register to vote through the MVC. Consistent with all applicable laws, individuals who apply to register to vote through the MVC affirm their citizenship. While it is exceedingly rare that non-citizens claim citizenship or other voter eligibility through the MVC, such instances are taken extremely seriously by this agency.»

SEE THE FULL CACHE OF DOCUMENTS HERE:

Advertisement

new jersey, politics, democrats elections, naturalization, republicans, voter fraud concerns

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias