Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

NATO ally Poland warns Russia, Belarus pushing illegal migrants toward alliance — and the US

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

This is part two of a series examining the challenges confronting the NATO alliance.

Advertisement

POLAND-BELARUS BORDER — Riding in a military convoy escorted by armored vehicles from Poland’s 18th «Iron Division» along the country’s 521-kilometer border with Belarus, soldiers pointed toward dense forests where they say Europe’s newest form of warfare is unfolding.

Polish officials warn illegal migrants weaponized by Russia and Belarus to destabilize NATO’s eastern flank are also making their way to the United States — part of what Warsaw calls an ongoing war against the Western alliance that has direct implications for American security.

The border was once guarded mainly by Poland’s Border Guard and police. But after years of mounting pressure from illegal crossings, Polish officials say the army was deployed because the situation became too large and too dangerous to handle as a conventional immigration challenge.

Advertisement

TROOPS AT THE BORDER: HOW THE MILITARY’S ROLE IN IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT HAS EXPLODED UNDER TRUMP

Soldiers from Poland’s 18th «Iron Division» take part in a military exercise at the Poland-Belarus border amid what Polish officials describe as a Russian and Belarusian campaign to weaponize illegal migration against NATO countries. (Efrat Lachter/Fox News Digital.)

Now, the frontier is guarded in layers: soldiers, border guards and rapid-response forces. A temporary barrier built in 2021 has become an electronic fence backed by surveillance systems and military patrols. Polish officials say migrants trying to cross have come from countries including Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan and India.

Advertisement

They describe the crisis as «artificial migration,» saying the illegals are flown into Belarus from the Middle East, Africa and Asia and then transported toward the Polish border by Belarusian authorities in an effort to pressure and destabilize NATO countries.

Military officials at the border said the peak was in 2021, when there were 39,697 illegal crossing attempts. By 2025, it was 29,869, slightly fewer than in 2024. So far in 2026, they have seen a major drop, they say.

For Warsaw, the numbers tell only part of the story.

Advertisement

Polish officials say the border pressure is not spontaneous illegal migration, but a Russian-backed Belarusian operation designed to destabilize NATO from within.

«We are at war,» Ambassador Krzysztof Olendzki of Poland’s Foreign Ministry told Fox News Digital after the border visit.

«Not only Poland, but also all the countries of the eastern flank of NATO, we are in war,» Olendzki said. «We cannot see it as a classical war with soldiers, with tanks and so on, but the war is exercised by our adversaries, by Belarus and Russia, who are using practically migrants as an asymmetric weapon against NATO countries.»

Advertisement

WHITE HOUSE ROADMAP SAYS EUROPE MAY BE ‘UNRECOGNIZABLE’ IN 20 YEARS AS MIGRATION RAISES DOUBTS ABOUT US ALLIES

Illegal migrants by Polish border.

File photo shows mostly male illegal migrants waiting at the closed area prepared by the Belarusian government within the border region after they cleared camps at the Poland-Belarus border, on Nov. 18, 2021, in Grodno region, Belarus.  (Sefa Karacan/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

The crisis dates back to 2021, when Poland, Lithuania and Latvia accused Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko’s regime of encouraging migrants from the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere to travel to Belarus and cross illegally into the European Union. Belarus has denied orchestrating the flows, but Poland and the EU have described the campaign as hybrid warfare.

Olendzki said the goal is not only to push people across the border, but to create chaos inside Western societies.

Advertisement

The border visit underscored how far Poland has gone to harden what it views as one of NATO’s most vulnerable frontiers.

Capt. Angelika Korkosz of Poland’s 18th Division described the day-to-day strain on soldiers stationed there.

«Many times soldiers were faced with aggression from illegal groups of immigrants, and they have to act appropriately and calmly in accordance with the law and procedures while protecting themselves,» Korkosz told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

POLISH GOVERNMENT PLANS MANDATORY MILITARY TRAINING FOR ADULT MEN

Polish soldier guarding the border with Belarus

A Polish soldier stands watch near the Belarus border, where officials say migration pressure has evolved into a form of hybrid warfare targeting NATO’s eastern flank on May 16, 2026.

Polish officials said migrants have used Molotov cocktails in at least two incidents, sparking fires near the border. Soldiers also spoke of a Polish serviceman who died after being stabbed by an illegal migrant at the frontier.

Korkosz said the challenge is not only violence, but exhaustion.

Advertisement

«A few months ago, we had minus-20-degree winters, so 12-hour duty during these conditions is really demanding,» she said. «Many soldiers are here for a long time, and it is getting more and more difficult, this long separation from their relatives.»

Still, she said the troops are prepared.

«The training includes decision-making under pressure in an ambiguous operational environment,» Korkosz said. «That’s why when we are here at the border, we are really well-prepared for performing our duties.»

Advertisement

Poland says the border defenses are working. Amb. Olendzki said the lower number of crossings this year reflects the physical barrier, the increased effectiveness of the Border Guard and the military presence. But he warned the threat has not disappeared, only shifted.

NATO WARNS RUSSIA AFTER POLAND SHOOTS DOWN ‘HUGE NUMBER’ OF DRONES THAT VIOLATED ITS AIRSPACE

Polish troops take part in drill at its border with Belarus

Soldiers from Poland’s 18th Division demonstrate battlefield medical training near the Belarus border after a serviceman from the division was killed in an attack by an illegal migrant. May 16th, 2026. (Efrat Lachter/Fox News)

«Seeing the fact that the Polish-Belarusian border is quite well guarded, our adversaries are just pushing migrants through the borders of our neighboring countries,» he said. «So it hasn’t ended, but it’s changed the direction. The threat still exists, and we must be vigilant.»

Advertisement

That matters to NATO because Poland’s border with Belarus is not only Warsaw’s border. It is also the eastern edge of the European Union and NATO territory.

Belarus is Russia’s closest ally and allowed its territory to be used for Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned Russia may be trying to pull Belarus deeper into the war and could use Belarusian territory to threaten Ukraine or even a NATO country.

That fear is central to Poland’s security posture.

Advertisement

During a meeting with reporters in Warsaw, Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski told Fox News Digital Russia’s war against Ukraine is, for Poland, «a matter of national safety and existence.»

But Sikorski said the threat to NATO countries is already wider than the battlefield in Ukraine.

«We had on NATO countries’ territories assassinations, numerous drone attacks on airports, on critical infrastructure,» Sikorski said. «We had very serious cyberattacks.»

Advertisement
Polish soldiers stand guard at the border with Belarus.

Polish soldiers stand watch near the Belarus border, where officials say migration pressure has evolved into a form of hybrid warfare targeting NATO’s eastern flank. May 16th, 2026. (Efrat Lachter/Fox News Digital)

Sikorski said Poland faced a Russian-instigated cyberattack last December on critical energy infrastructure that Warsaw believes was intended «to black out part of Poland.»

The warning fits a broader pattern of concerns across NATO’s eastern flank. The Associated Press reported earlier this year that balloons from Belarus had crossed into Polish airspace for a third consecutive night, with Polish forces describing the incidents as attempts to test air defense responses.

For Poland, illegal migration, cyberattacks, drones, sabotage and disinformation are not separate problems. They are different pieces of one Russian and Belarusian pressure campaign against NATO.

Advertisement

Olendzki said Poland’s role is to stop the pressure before it moves deeper into Europe or beyond.

«Standing on guard on the eastern flank of NATO, we are providing security not only to Poland, to Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, but to entire NATO, also to the United States,» he said.

Migrants at US-Mexico border

US Border Patrol agents prepare to transport migrants for asylum claim processing at the US-Mexico border in Campo, California, US, on Friday, April 5, 2024. Last week a federal judge sharply questioned the Biden administration’s position that it bears no responsibility for housing and feeding migrant children while they wait in makeshift camps along the US-Mexico border, reported the AP.  (Mark Abramson/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

That U.S. connection is a central part of Poland’s message to Washington: The eastern flank is not a distant European problem, but a front line in a broader confrontation with Russia and its allies.

Advertisement

Poland now spends nearly 5% of its GDP on defense, the highest rate in NATO, if based on GPD. Sikorski said Warsaw has long taken defense spending seriously.

«We never went below 2% defense spending,» Sikorski said. «Now we are spending almost 5%. This is real military spending.»

He said the eastern flank has become more influential inside NATO because countries closest to Russia were proven right.

Advertisement

US ALLIES ACCUSE RUSSIA OF ‘ESCALATING HYBRID ACTIVITIES’ AGAINST NATO, EU NATIONS AFTER DATA CABLES SEVERED

Poland-Belarus border

A Polish border guard at the Polish-Belarus border fence near the village of Ozierany Male, Poland, on Friday, Jul. 4, 2025.  (Damian Lemanski/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

«The eastern flank is much more powerful than even five years ago,» Sikorski said. «We were right about the nature of Putin’s regime and Russia’s aggressive strategy.»

That view has shaped Poland’s approach to the United States. Warsaw wants American troops to remain in Europe, but Polish officials also acknowledge that Europe must assume more of the defense burden as U.S. attention increasingly shifts toward China and the Indo-Pacific.

Advertisement

Sikorski said Poland understands that «Europe ceased to be angle number one for U.S. foreign policy,» but wants any change in America’s role to be «gradual and well-designed.»

He added that Poland wants the shift in trans-Atlantic security to be «not a divorce, but a new kind of relationship.»

For now, that relationship is being tested along a cold, wooded border where Poland says NATO’s future wars may already be taking shape.

Advertisement

The Polish soldiers patrolling the frontier do not describe their mission in grand geopolitical terms. Korkosz said she joined the military because she wanted to do «something which matters.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Polish army convoy close to Belarus border

Members of Poland’s 18th «Iron Division» patrol the Belarus border as Warsaw accuses Belarus and Russia of funneling illegal migrants toward NATO territory. May 16, 2026. (Efrat Lachter/Fox News Digital)

But to Polish officials, the mission at the Belarus border is much bigger than immigration enforcement.

Advertisement

It is a warning to the rest of NATO that the alliance’s next war may not begin with tanks crossing a border, but with migrants pushed through forests, cyberattacks on power grids, drones near airports and disinformation campaigns designed to fracture societies from within.



nato, belarus, border security, military, terrorism, russia

INTERNACIONAL

El régimen de Irán entregó una nueva propuesta a Pakistán para reanudar la negociación con EEUU

Published

on


Qalibaf y el ministro pakistaní Naqvi durante su reunión en Teherán, el 17 de mayo de 2026. Irán entregó una nueva propuesta para reanudar negociaciones con EE.UU. (WANA vía REUTERS)

Irán entregó este domingo al ministro del Interior de Pakistán, Mohsin Naqvi, un nuevo paquete de propuestas destinado a reactivar las negociaciones estancadas con Estados Unidos, en el marco de los esfuerzos de mediación de Islamabad para evitar el colapso del frágil alto el fuego vigente desde el 8 de abril.

Según el medio iraní Iran Nuances, el documento combina el plan de 14 puntos presentado por Teherán la semana pasada con las condiciones planteadas recientemente por Washington. Naqvi se reunió en Teherán con el presidente iraní, Masud Pezeshkian, y con el presidente del Parlamento, Mohamad Baqer Qalibaf, quien ofició como jefe negociador de Irán en las conversaciones directas celebradas el 11 y 12 de abril en Islamabad.

Advertisement
El presidente Donald Trump parte de Beijing a bordo del Air Force One el 15 de mayo de 2026. Netanyahu anunció este domingo que hablará con Trump sobre la situación con Irán tras su regreso de China. (REUTERS/Evan Vucci, archivo)
El presidente Donald Trump parte de Beijing a bordo del Air Force One el 15 de mayo de 2026. Netanyahu anunció este domingo que hablará con Trump sobre la situación con Irán tras su regreso de China. (REUTERS/Evan Vucci, archivo)

La agencia Fars, vinculada a la Guardia Revolucionaria, dijo que Estados Unidos presentó a Irán cinco condiciones a través de Pakistán: la entrega de 440 kilos de uranio enriquecido al 60%, el mantenimiento activo de una única instalación nuclear, el rechazo a pagar compensaciones por daños de guerra y la negativa a desbloquear siquiera el 25% de los activos iraníes congelados en el extranjero. Washington además condicionó el cese de hostilidades en todos los frentes al avance de las negociaciones nucleares.

La agencia Mehr fue más directa en su lectura: “Estados Unidos, sin hacer concesiones tangibles, pretende conseguir concesiones que no logró obtener durante la guerra, lo que conducirá a un punto muerto en las negociaciones”. La misma fuente señaló que Washington exige “restricciones muy estrictas y duraderas” al sector nuclear iraní.

Las demandas de Teherán

El canciller ruso Sergey Lavrov y el vicecanciller saudí Waleed bin Abdulkarim, junto a otros ministros de Exteriores de los BRICS —entre ellos el iraní Abbas Araghchi—, antes de la foto de familia de la cumbre en Nueva Delhi, el 14 de mayo de 2026. (AP/Manish Swarup)
El canciller ruso Sergey Lavrov y el vicecanciller saudí Waleed bin Abdulkarim, junto a otros ministros de Exteriores de los BRICS —entre ellos el iraní Abbas Araghchi—, antes de la foto de familia de la cumbre en Nueva Delhi, el 14 de mayo de 2026. (AP/Manish Swarup)

Irán había planteado la semana pasada condiciones previas a cualquier negociación sobre su programa nuclear: el fin de la guerra en todos los frentes, el levantamiento de las sanciones, la liberación de fondos bloqueados, compensaciones por daños de guerra y el reconocimiento de la soberanía iraní sobre el estrecho de Ormuz. El presidente Trump calificó esa propuesta de “pedazo de basura” y describió la tregua como “increíblemente frágil”.

Pese al estancamiento, el canciller iraní, Abbas Araghchi, aseguró el viernes al margen de la reunión ministerial de los BRICS en Nueva Delhi que ambos países siguen intercambiando mensajes.

El portavoz de las Fuerzas Armadas iraníes, Abolfazl Shekarchi, advirtió este domingo que si Irán es atacado de nuevo, “los recursos y el ejército” de Estados Unidos se verán “confrontados a escenarios inéditos, ofensivos, sorprendentes y tumultuosos”.

Advertisement

Qalibaf, en tanto, fue designado este domingo para supervisar las relaciones de Irán con China, según la agencia Tasnim, en un movimiento que refuerza el papel del negociador jefe iraní en la arquitectura diplomática de Teherán durante el conflicto.

En paralelo, Israel volvió a atacar el este y el sur de Líbano pese al frágil alto el fuego, con impactos en la localidad de Sohmor, en el valle de la Bekaa, y en varias zonas del sur, según la agencia estatal libanesa NNA. Un soldado israelí murió en combate en el sur del país, elevando a 21 los caídos israelíes desde el inicio de la guerra contra Hezbollah a comienzos de marzo. Desde el inicio del conflicto, los ataques israelíes han matado a más de 2.900 personas en Líbano, incluyendo más de 400 desde el inicio de la tregua el 17 de abril.

En otro frente de la crisis, el director general del OIEA, Rafael Grossi, expresó “profunda preocupación” tras el ataque con dron registrado este domingo cerca de la central nuclear de Barakah en Emiratos Árabes Unidos, que provocó un incendio en un generador eléctrico externo sin causar heridos ni elevar los niveles de radiactividad. “Cualquier actividad militar que amenace la seguridad nuclear es inaceptable”, advirtió Grossi.

Advertisement



International,Relations,Diplomacy / Foreign Policy,Middle East

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Senate parliamentarian rejects $1 billion in reconciliation bill for White House security, Trump ballroom

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Senate parliamentarian rejected the last item in the Republicans’ budget reconciliation bill — $1 billion in White House and Secret Service security funding tied in part to President Donald Trump’s planned ballroom

Advertisement

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, considered nonpartisan since taking the role in 2012 during former President Barack Obama’s administration, ruled the funding provision could not be included as written under budget reconciliation rules, an outcome long expected from both sides of the aisle.

Ryan Wrasse, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in a social media post that Republicans would keep trying to revise the legislation to try to gain the parliamentarian’s approval.

«Redraft. Refine. Resubmit,» Wrasse wrote on X. «None of this is abnormal during a Byrd process.»

Advertisement

FURY ERUPTS AS UNELECTED SENATE ‘SCOREKEEPER’ BLOCKS TRUMP’S AGENDA

The decision deals a blow to efforts to pass the money with a simple majority as part of a broader roughly $72 billion package focused largely on immigration enforcement after Democrats forced those budgetary items under the longest shutdowns in American history.

MacDonough ruled that the security funding provision falls under chamber rules that require 60 votes to pass most legislation, according to the office of Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., the Senate Budget Committee ranking member.

Advertisement

«While we expect Republicans to change this bill to appease Trump, Democrats are prepared to challenge any change to this bill,» Merkley said.

REPUBLICANS EYE PICKING UP $400M TAB FOR TRUMP’S BALLROOM AS SOME DEMS OPEN TO ‘DISCUSS’ IDEA

Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough forced Senate Republicans to rewrite the $72 billion reconciliation bill with regard to the $1 billion for White House security and ballroom backing. (Getty Images/Reuters)

Advertisement

The parliamentarian interprets Senate rules, including whether legislative provisions are permitted. While MacDonough is nonpartisan by Senate standards, she served as former Vice President Al Gore’s advisor in the Bush v. Gore 2000 election challenge that was resolved in the Supreme Court.

Her ruling came days after several Senate Republicans questioned the Trump administration’s $1 billion request, with some saying they needed far more detail before backing taxpayer funding connected to a project Trump has said would be privately financed.

«It was one thing when private dollars were building it,» Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, told Fox News Digital before a closed-door briefing with Secret Service Director Sean Curran. «If you’re asking me for a billion dollars, I have some really hard questions.»

Advertisement

TRUMP CLAIMS DONOR FUNDED WHITE HOUSE BALLROOM INCLUDES HIDDEN BUILD BELOW WITH SECURITY FOCUS

President Donald Trump holding a rendering while speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One

President Donald Trump holds rendering of the White House ballroom in an Air Force One media scrum. (Mandel Ngan/AFP)

Curtis added that if an employee brought him a billion-dollar project with little explanation, he would respond: «You made that number up.»

The request included $220 million for «White House complex hardening,» including above- and below-ground security enhancements for the ballroom, according to a one-page breakdown obtained by Fox News Digital. Those upgrades included bulletproof glass, drone detection technology, chemical filtration and detection systems and other national security measures.

Advertisement

Another $180 million was proposed for a White House visitor screening center, while $600 million would go toward Secret Service training, protection for Trump and other officials, counter-drone measures and other security needs after Trump dodged an unprecedented third assassination attempt last month.

TRUMP’S TROUBLING WEEK: DEMANDING GOVERNMENT MONEY, DEMOLISHING THE EAST WING

Republicans defending the request have argued Democrats and critics are mischaracterizing the funding as a direct ballroom subsidy.

Advertisement

«What was clear today is this whole statement, ‘It’s a billion dollars for a ballroom.’ Anyone who prints that is printing something they know is a lie,» Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., told Fox News Digital. «It’s not a billion dollars for the ballroom.»

Still, other Republicans said the administration had not fully explained how it arrived at the number. Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., said officials needed to provide «more details about exactly how they arrived at the figure,» while Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., said the administration would have to explain to taxpayers what return they would get for the spending.

SCHUMER, DEMOCRATS PLOT COORDINATED RESISTANCE TO TRUMP’S ‘ONE UGLY BILL’

Advertisement

The White House and GOP supporters have framed the funding as a national security matter, citing threats against Trump and the need to modernize protective infrastructure at the White House. The administration has said the ballroom would reduce reliance on temporary outdoor structures for large events while improving security for the president, his family and visitors.

The ballroom project has faced opposition since Trump ordered the demolition of the White House’s East Wing last year to make way for the new facility. The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued, arguing the administration lacked authority to tear down the historic structure or build a major new facility without explicit congressional approval. A federal appeals court in April allowed construction to continue while the legal fight proceeds.

Trump has said the ballroom itself would be funded by $400 million in private donations and completed around September 2028, near the end of his second term. The parliamentarian’s ruling does not end the broader spending bill, but it complicates GOP efforts to keep the White House security money in a package Republicans hope to pass along party lines.

Advertisement

APPEALS COURT LETS TRUMP RESUME WHITE HOUSE BALLROOM CONSTRUCTION, SEEKS LOWER COURT CLARITY

Democrats have cast the project as excessive and politically tone-deaf, arguing Republicans are trying to steer taxpayer money toward Trump’s signature construction project while Americans face rising costs.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called the ballroom «a disgrace» and said Republicans should reject the funding.

Advertisement

«The bottom line is, this ballroom is a disgrace,» he said. «The Republicans know it. Let’s see if they have the guts to do what they know is right, both substantively and politically, and tell Trump we don’t need a God — we don’t need a damn ballroom.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Notably, the ballroom would not be finished until 2028, the last year of Trump’s second, and last, presidential term by constitutional law. Trump argues it would serve Democrat and Republican administrations equally.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Alex Miller and Reuters contributed to this report.

senate elections, white house, national security, republicans, democrats senate

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Qué se sabe del virus Bundibugyo, la extraña variante del ébola por la que la OMS declaró la emergencia global

Published

on


El brote de ébola que se desató en África llevó a la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) a declarar este domingo la emergencia de salud pública internacional. Ya provocó 88 muertes y cerca de 300 casos en la República Democrática del Congo y su vecina Uganda.

Un elemento que preocupa a las autoridades que es la crisis actual del ébola está provocada por una variante rara y difícil de tratar.

Advertisement

Se trata del virus Bundibugyo, para la cual no existen tratamientos específicos ni vacunas aprobados. Aunque ha habido más de 20 brotes de ébola en la República Democrática del Congo y Uganda, esta es apenas la tercera vez que se detecta el virus Bundibugyo.

«Es una forma grave y a menudo mortal de la enfermedad del ébola», destacó la OMS este domingo en un comunicado publicado en sus redes sociales.

El organismo internacional -del que Argentina salió este año siguiendo la misma decisión tomada por los Estados Unidos- indicó que en el Congo se concentran todos los casos excepto dos, los cuales fueron reportados en la vecina Uganda.

Advertisement

El virus Bundibugyo fue detectado por primera vez en el distrito Bundibugyo de Uganda, durante un brote en 2007 y 2008, en el que 149 personas resultaron infectadas y 37 murieron. La segunda vez fue en 2012, en un brote en Isiro, República Democrática del Congo, donde se reportaron 57 casos y 29 fallecimientos.

«La transmisión se amplifica particularmente en entornos de atención sanitaria cuando las medidas de prevención y control de infecciones (IPC) son inadecuadas, y durante prácticas de entierro inseguras que involucran contacto directo con el fallecido», destacó la OMS.

Emergencia por el ébola

Advertisement

Pese a su gravedad, el brote actual no cumple con los criterios de una emergencia pandémica, por lo que la OMS desaconsejó el cierre de fronteras internacionales.

En una publicación en la red social X, el organismo indicó que también se ha reportado un caso confirmado por laboratorio en la capital congoleña, Kinshasa, que está a unos 1.000 kilómetros (620 millas) del epicentro del brote en la provincia oriental de Ituri, lo que deja entrever una posible propagación más amplia.

Señaló que el paciente había visitado Ituri y que también se han reportado otros presuntos casos en la provincia de Kivu del Norte, que es una de las más pobladas del Congo y limita con Ituri.

Advertisement

Una enfermedad altamente contagiosa

El ébola es altamente contagioso y puede contraerse a través de fluidos corporales como el vómito, la sangre o el semen. La enfermedad que provoca es rara, pero grave y a menudo mortal.

El objetivo de la declaración de emergencia por parte de la OMS es impulsar a las agencias donantes y a los países a actuar. Según los estándares de la OMS, muestra que el evento es grave, existe riesgo de propagación internacional y requiere una respuesta internacional coordinada.

Advertisement
Un paciente es trasladado en una camilla improvisada en el Congo. Foto: Reuters

Sin embargo, la respuesta global a declaraciones anteriores ha sido desigual. En 2024, cuando la OMS declaró que los brotes de viruela símica en el Congo y en otras partes de África eran una emergencia global, algunos expertos dijeron en ese momento que sirvió de poco para que diversos suministros —entre ellos pruebas diagnósticas, medicamentos y vacunas— llegaran rápidamente a los países afectados.

La migración complica el rastreo de casos

El director general de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades de África, el doctor Jean Kaseya, dijo el sábado que en la comunidad aún hay un alto número de casos activos, particularmente en Mongwalu, donde se reportaron los primeros casos, “complicando significativamente los esfuerzos de contención y rastreo de contactos”.

El conflicto violento con milicianos —algunos de ellos respaldados por el grupo Estado Islámico—, así como el constante movimiento de población debido a la minería, tanto dentro del Congo como a través de la frontera con Uganda, también han planteado un gran reto para las labores de respuesta.

Advertisement

Las autoridades informaron por primera vez el viernes sobre la propagación de la enfermedad en la provincia oriental congoleña de Ituri, cercana a Uganda y Sudán del Sur. El sábado, los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades de África reportaron 336 presuntos casos y 87 muertes en el Congo.

“Hay incertidumbres significativas sobre el número real de personas infectadas y la propagación geográfica relacionada con este evento en el momento actual. Además, hay una comprensión limitada de los vínculos epidemiológicos con casos conocidos o sospechosos”, señaló Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general de la OMS.

Los dos casos en Uganda incluyen a una persona de la que las autoridades dijeron que había viajado desde el Congo y murió en un hospital en la capital ugandesa, Kampala, y a otra que, según la OMS, también había viajado desde el Congo.

Advertisement

La OMS indicó que el alto porcentaje de casos positivos entre las muestras analizadas, la propagación a Kampala y Uganda, y los conglomerados de muertes en Ituri “apuntan a un brote potencialmente mucho mayor que lo que actualmente se está detectando y reportando, con un riesgo significativo de propagación local y regional”.

El brote en el Congo dejó 50 muertos antes de ser detectado
Kaseya indicó que la detección lenta retrasó la respuesta y le dio tiempo al virus para propagarse.

“Este brote comenzó en abril. Hasta ahora no conocemos el caso índice. Eso significa que no sabemos cuál es la magnitud de este brote”, explicó Kaseya, usando un término para referirse al primer caso detectable de una epidemia.

Advertisement

La presunta víctima más temprana de la que se tienen noticias, un hombre de 59 años, desarrolló síntomas el 24 de abril y murió en un hospital en Ituri el 27 del mismo mes.

Para cuando las autoridades sanitarias fueron alertadas por primera vez sobre el brote a través de redes sociales el 5 de mayo, ya se habían registrado 50 muertes, dijeron los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades de África.

Cuatro tratamientos bajo consideración

Advertisement

Los diagnósticos y las vacunas han sido un gran problema para África Shanelle Hall, asesora principal del jefe de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades en África, dijo a reporteros el sábado que había cuatro tratamientos bajo consideración para el virus Bundibugyo, pero que no se estaba considerando activamente ninguna vacuna.

Un problema aún mayor es que incluso las vacunas y tratamientos existentes para otros virus del ébola no se fabrican en África. La lucha del continente por obtener vacunas de países más ricos durante la pandemia de COVID-19 impulsó distintas iniciativas para acelerar su capacidad de fabricar vacunas, pero los recursos siguen siendo escasos.

Kaseya dijo que la demanda de una vacuna para un virus raro como Bundibugyo, que no es tan mortal como el ébola Zaire —predominante en los brotes pasados del Congo— ha sido el problema recurrente en las discusiones con compañías farmacéuticas sobre la fabricación de vacunas,

Advertisement

“Si de verdad queremos triunfar en este continente, tenemos que fabricar lo que necesitamos”, afirmó. “No podemos esperar a que otros vengan a decirnos qué hacen cada día”.

Continue Reading

Tendencias