INTERNACIONAL
Obama Center embeds ‘Indigenous’ land message on controversial site

Illinois GOP chair says Obama Center is political operation on public land
Illinois Republican Party Chairman Bob Grogan says the Obama Presidential Center functions as a political operation and headquarters for the Obama Foundation rather than a traditional presidential library. Grogan discusses public land, taxpayer-funded infrastructure, the Center’s endowment shortfall and why critics continue to oppose the project.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Following its Juneteenth opening, the Obama Presidential Center is embracing a message tied to one of the modern left’s most contentious ideas: that America was built on land «stolen» from Indians.
During Thursday’s dedication ceremony, Obama Foundation CEO Valerie Jarrett opened proceedings by acknowledging the American Indian tribes who originally inhabited the land where the center now stands.
But the acknowledgment extends well beyond the opening ceremony.
Just a few feet from the center’s landmark museum tower and near the Obama statue, visitors encounter a permanent display titled «Acknowledging Indigenous Peoples’ Land and Territory.»
OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER’S OPENING CEREMONY RIDICULED FOR ‘LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT’ BEFORE STAR-STUDDED SHOW
Composite image showing Obama Foundation CEO Valerie Jarrett speaking during the Obama Presidential Center opening ceremony, the Center’s museum tower and a permanent Indigenous land acknowledgment display located on the campus in Chicago. (Michael Dorgan/Fox News Digital; Fox Flight Team; Mustafa Hussain/Bloomberg via Getty)
The sign states that the Obama Foundation acknowledges «the sovereign Indigenous peoples who have, since time immemorial, inhabited and stewarded the lands many of us call home.»
Another section of the sign states that «Indigenous peoples» have worked to «combat and rightfully reverse the forces of settler colonialism» and features a 2009 Obama quote reflecting on broken treaties, lost lands and the treatment of Native Americans.
«Treaties were violated. Promises were broken,» Obama said.
Land acknowledgments have become common at universities, museums and public events, but critics often mock them as performative exercises associated with the view that America was built on «stolen land.» Supporters argue they serve as an important recognition of the history of American Indians and their connection to the land.
SUBCONTRACTORS SAY THEY’RE OWED MILLIONS, FACE FINANCIAL RUIN, AFTER HELPING BUILD OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER

A permanent Indigenous land acknowledgment display inside the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago includes a quote from former President Barack Obama about broken treaties and lost lands, as well as text recognizing Native American tribes historically connected to the area. The display is located near the museum tower and Obama statue. (Michael Dorgan/Fox News Digital)
But the land acknowledgment also underlines a glaring irony, one that was largely absent from Thursday’s opening ceremony, according to some critics. The Obama Presidential Center, operated by the private Obama Foundation, sits on public land transferred to the foundation by the city of Chicago for just $10 under a controversial agreement.
«People here in future years are going to hear about how this land was stolen from the Native Americans,» Illinois GOP Chair Bob Grogan told Fox News Digital outside the Center last week. «But underneath, you should all be reading into this, that it was actually stolen from the citizens of Illinois, not from the Native Americans.»
The criticism stems from a yearslong legal and political battle over the transfer of 19.3 acres of Jackson Park public land to the Obama Foundation under a 99-year agreement requiring the one-time $10 payment.
Critics also argue that what was originally presented as a presidential library evolved into a campus that serves as the home of the Obama Foundation.

A map graphic shows the footprint of the Obama Presidential Center inside Jackson Park on Chicago’s South Side along Lake Michigan. (Fox News Digital)
Grogan said visitors should view the display through the lens of the Center’s own history. He argued the land was created after the Great Chicago Fire through landfill and public works projects and therefore belongs to Chicago taxpayers.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«This land actually was recaptured from the Great Chicago Fire. They took a bunch of rubble and actually created this land,» he said. «So it has nothing to do with the Native Americans, but it has everything to do with stealing it from the taxpayers of the city of Chicago.»
Grogan argued the land fight cannot be separated from the broader controversy surrounding the Center, which has seen construction costs approach $1 billion and required millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded infrastructure improvements around Jackson Park. He also pointed to the Obama Foundation’s unfulfilled pledge to build a $470 million endowment fund intended to protect taxpayers from future operating costs.

Barack Obama speaks during the dedication of the Barack Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, Illinois. (Kent NISHIMURA / AFP via Getty Images)
Critics point to another irony.
In addition, the Center was promoted as a catalyst for economic opportunity on Chicago’s South Side and a vehicle for supporting minority-owned businesses. Yet a recent Fox News Digital investigation found several subcontractors — including minority-owned firms — claiming they are owed millions of dollars for work performed on the project.
The Obama Foundation did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.
Fox News’ Peter D’Abrosca contributed to this report.
barack obama, heritage, chicago, land, treaties, parks, culture opinion, republicans elections
INTERNACIONAL
Entrevista exclusiva: Fue presidente, lo condenaron a 45 años de cárcel en EE.UU. por traficar 400 toneladas de cocaína y Trump lo indultó
INTERNACIONAL
At least one tourist dead after massive fire nearly destroys Caribbean resort; 1,690 evacuated

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
At least one Italian tourist is dead with several more injured after a massive fire in the Dominican Republic resort town Bayahibe Friday.
The deceased woman, 46-year-old Italian national Francesca Valentino, died at the resort’s Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel, according to the Dominican Republic’s Directorate of Out-of-Hospital Emergency Services (DAEH).
At least nine other people were treated for injuries, with three of those taken to off-site medical centers, DAEH said in a statement.
Authorities evacuated 1,690 tourists from the popular resort town, The Associated Press reported, citing local authorities.
AT LEAST 18 DEAD, 120 INJURED IN ROOF COLLAPSE AT DOMINICAN REPUBLIC NIGHTCLUB
A drone view shows a fire at the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel in Bayahibe, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic, June 19, 2026, in this screen grab obtained from social media video. (Gojko Culibrk/via Reuters)
Aerial video of the blaze showed smoke billowing from numerous beachside buildings, with large gray plumes of smoke casting dark shadows on the beach’s turquoise waters.
RESIDENTS WAKE UP SCREAMING AS COPS RACE TO RESCUE THEM FROM LATE-NIGHT APARTMENT BLAZE: VIDEO
Authorities reported that «preliminary observations indicate that the fire spread rapidly due to the flammable nature of parts of the roof structures made of palm, as well as wind conditions,» according to Reuters.

A drone view shows a fire at the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel in Bayahibe, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic, June 19, 2026, in this screen grab obtained from social media video. (Gojko Culibrk/via Reuters)
Guests were moved to other hotels, such as the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Palace, a nearby hotel run by the same operators as the Viva Wyndham Dominicus Beach Hotel. The Palace did not sustain any damage, according to Reuters.

Police officers operate after a fire at a Viva Dominicus resort in Bayahibe, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic, June 19, 2026, in this still taken from a social media video. (Junito Mieses/via Reuters)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
«Tourist activities in Bayahibe and the surrounding area remain unaffected and continue to take place safely and as normal,» the Dominican Republic’s Emergency Operations Center (COE) also noted.
Video of the aftermath shows a drone spraying water on a charred and destroyed block of buildings as the structures continue to smolder.
Fox News Digital contacted DAEH, COE and Wyndham Hotels and Resorts for additional comment.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
resorts, caribbean, fires disasters, hotels, dominican republic
INTERNACIONAL
Trump advirtió que EEUU podría imponer peajes en Ormuz si el régimen de Irán no llega a un acuerdo final en 60 días

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, afirmó este sábado que no se impondrán peajes en el estrecho de Ormuz durante el periodo de alto el fuego de 60 días ni tampoco tras su expiración. El anuncio, realizado a través de la red Truth Social, se produce tras la firma de un memorando de entendimiento entre Washington y Teherán, que abrió una tregua para negociar el fin de la guerra iniciada el pasado 28 de febrero.
“No habrá peajes en el estrecho de Ormuz durante los 60 días que dure el periodo de alto el fuego, y tampoco los habrá una vez transcurrido dicho periodo, a menos que sean impuestos por y para los Estados Unidos de América, en caso de que no se cierre el acuerdo, a cambio de los servicios prestados como ‘ángel de la guarda’ a los países de Oriente Medio, con el fin de reembolsar los costes pasados, presentes y futuros”, señaló el jefe de Estado.
El mensaje del mandatario estadounidense llega en medio de nuevas tensiones en la región, luego de que el mando militar central de Irán anunciara el cierre del estratégico estrecho de Ormuz en respuesta a los recientes ataques de Israel contra Hezbollah en Líbano. Las autoridades iraníes acusaron a Estados Unidos de incumplir el acuerdo y señalaron la “violación continua e implacable del alto el fuego en el sur de Líbano por parte del régimen sionista”.
El estrecho de Ormuz, vital para el transporte global de petróleo y gas, permaneció bloqueado durante gran parte de la guerra, provocando una inestabilidad significativa en los mercados energéticos internacionales. Irán había reabierto la vía marítima tras el memorando firmado con Estados Unidos, permitiendo una reanudación paulatina del tráfico comercial. La situación volvió a complicarse con el cierre anunciado tras los bombardeos israelíes en territorio libanés.
La Armada estadounidense respondió al anuncio iraní asegurando que se mantiene “vigilante”, mientras la diplomacia internacional intenta reactivar los esfuerzos de negociación. El viernes estaba previsto el inicio de una nueva ronda de conversaciones en Suiza, pero el proceso quedó aplazado sin fecha tras la muerte de decenas de personas en Líbano a raíz de los ataques israelíes, en represalia por la muerte de cuatro soldados.
En este contexto, un funcionario estadounidense comunicó la tarde del viernes la entrada en vigor de un alto el fuego entre Israel y Hezbollah. Sin embargo, el ejército israelí reportó nuevos ataques contra posiciones del movimiento islamista libanés, al que responsabilizó de haber disparado más de 50 proyectiles hacia sus tropas en el sur de Líbano en las últimas horas.
Los enfrentamientos han puesto en riesgo el memorando de entendimiento firmado por Donald Trump y el presidente iraní, Masud Pezeshkian, que establece un cese de hostilidades en todos los frentes de la guerra, incluyendo el territorio libanés. Esta condición se considera clave para las autoridades de Irán.
Ambas partes continúan cruzando acusaciones sobre la responsabilidad de las violaciones de la tregua. El portavoz de la cancillería israelí, Oren Marmorstein, declaró en la red X que “Hezbollah continúa violando constantemente el alto al fuego”.
La escalada en Líbano, desencadenada tras el asesinato de un líder iraní durante el primer día de la ofensiva israeloestadounidense, ha sido uno de los principales obstáculos para el diálogo entre Washington y Teherán. El memorando de entendimiento, alcanzado a principios de la semana, contempla la reapertura del estrecho de Ormuz y un periodo de 60 días de negociación para tratar asuntos pendientes como el programa nuclear iraní y el levantamiento de sanciones económicas.
El vicepresidente estadounidense, JD Vance, tenía previsto asistir al inicio de la nueva fase de diálogo en Suiza, aunque aplazó su viaje. De acuerdo con sus declaraciones de este sábado, planea trasladarse al país europeo en los próximos días para participar en las conversaciones de paz. Los negociadores estadounidenses Jared Kushner y Steve Witkoff ya se encuentran en Suiza para abordar aspectos técnicos del diálogo. Irán también envió una delegación diplomática, cuyo portavoz, Esmail Baqai, advirtió que el acuerdo podría peligrar si no se implementa “lo antes posible”.
Por otro lado, Pakistán anunció que el domingo se llevarán a cabo “conversaciones técnicas” entre delegaciones de Estados Unidos y Teherán, mediadas por representantes de Pakistán y Qatar.
El futuro del alto el fuego y la apertura del estrecho de Ormuz dependen de la evolución de las hostilidades y del avance en las negociaciones. La comunidad internacional permanece atenta a los próximos movimientos de los actores involucrados y al impacto sobre el comercio energético global.
North America,Government / Politics
POLITICA3 días agoPatricia Bullrich: “El Presidente considera que Adorni dio una explicación razonable”
POLITICA2 días agoEl lapidario posteo de Javier Milei contra Florencia Peña por la fake news sobre la muerte del papá de Messi
SOCIEDAD3 días agoNi ladrillos ni construcción en seco: el invento alemán que permite edificar una casa en 7 días y sin cemento



















