Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Fragile relationship with House GOP has Senate Republicans warning ‘something needs to change’

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Senate Republicans are taking stock of their relationship with the House GOP as they gear up for another key test of their unity across chambers. 

Advertisement

Dysfunction, miscommunications and wasted time have dotted the last few months of Republicans’ control of Congress, particularly during the longest government shutdown on record. 

Republicans in the upper chamber aren’t singling out others in the House who should bear responsibility, but they do agree that something needs to change as they plow forward to fund immigration operations for the next few years. 

TRUMP SAYS HE ‘CAN’T STAND’ SOME REPUBLICANS FOR REFUSING ONE KEY MOVE FOR HIS AGENDA

Advertisement

Senate Republicans have grown frustrated with their counterparts in the House over the sluggish pace of legislation. Some argue it’s a communication breakdown among leadership, others put the blame on just how different the two chambers are. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images; Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

«I think we all need to get in a room and figure out what’s our plan,» Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., told Fox News Digital. «And how are we going to get things done for the American people? That has to be the goal, and right now something needs to change.»

Republicans are readying to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol for the next three and a half years through budget reconciliation, which will require near-perfect unanimity in both chambers to work, given that Democrats are getting cut out of the process. 

Advertisement

But divisions between the chambers were laid bare during the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shutdown, when House Republicans, led by House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., refused to consider the Senate’s compromise plan to reopen the agency. 

That decision prolonged the shutdown for nearly a month, and spurred the necessity to turn to reconciliation. It also fostered frustration between the Senate and House at a time when leadership and President Donald Trump are calling for unity.

JOHNSON SCRAMBLES AS TRUMP, SENATE REPUBLICANS PRESSURE HOUSE TO FUND DHS

Advertisement
Sen. Katie Britt attending a Senate hearing in the U.S. Capitol

Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., attends a Senate hearing in the U.S. Capitol. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Both Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., have thin majorities to work with — Johnson more so than Thune. That reality isn’t something that’s lost on Senate Republicans, particularly on legislation that Democrats won’t support, and is so far preventing the knives from coming out in the upper chamber. 

«I mean, I think we understand the challenges that Mike has over there. He’s not king. He’s the speaker of the House,» Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., told Fox News Digital.
»And their margin of error is less than ours, proportionately. So I can’t imagine. I think he’s doing the very best he can.» 

Some Republicans argue that it’s more of a communication issue between the chambers than unfettered dysfunction in the House.

Advertisement

Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, told Fox News Digital he didn’t buy the «whole House’s dysfunction» argument, and instead said it was incumbent on senators to make more of an effort. 

«I think we have to take a little bit of ownership ourselves here in the Senate, and that’s certainly not [just] the leadership, but all of us,» Moreno said. «Because when we’re working on bills, we should have total, complete synchronicity with the House.» 

‘SHIRTS AND SKINS’: HOW ONE REPUBLICAN BRIDGED THE GAP TO PASS TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’

Advertisement
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso speaking to reporters at the U.S. Capitol.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., speaks to reporters after voting at the U.S. Capitol on March 4, 2026. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

House Republicans, for example, contended that they were blindsided by the Senate deal to reopen the bulk of DHS earlier this year that carved out funding for ICE and Border Patrol.

 «We’ve got to be able to make sure we’re communicating better and working through the issues,» Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., told Fox News Digital. «The House isn’t our enemy. We gotta be able to resolve all the issues on a piece of legislation. We have differences of opinion. OK, let’s work them out.»

The issue of communication is one that, since Republicans took control of both chambers last year, was largely handled by DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin, the former GOP senator who acted as a de facto liaison between both chambers for major legislative pushes. 

Advertisement

When asked if Republicans needed a Mullin 2.0, Lankford said that the main points of communication fell on Thune and Johnson.

And Thune has not been quick to criticize Johnson or House Republicans publicly and noted that the nature of both chambers and how they operate would lead to issues along the way. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«We obviously have a 60-vote threshold,» Thune said.
»We need Democrats. You know, he doesn’t need Democrats, but he needs every Republican, and that’s a real challenge on a good day. And, you know, sometimes there aren’t a lot of good days around here.»

Conversely, Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., argued that despite the issues, if Democrats were in control of the chambers, Americans would have been hit with the largest tax hike in decades had Republicans not mustered a unified front to pass Trump’s «big, beautiful bill.» 

«All of that would have been in the opposite if the Democrats had been in the majority and been able to do what they wanted to do to raise taxes,» Barrasso told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

politics, mike johnson, congress, john thune, republicans, senate elections

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Suspect ‘neutralized’ after Montreal shooting leaves at least 2 dead including officer

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A gunman was «neutralized» Monday following a shooting in Montreal that left one police officer and one other person dead. 

Advertisement

Authorities told Fox News that the shooting happened in the Côte-des-Neiges neighborhood of the city.

NYPD RELEASES DRAMATIC BODY CAM FOOTAGE OF OFFICERS TACKLING ALLEGED TEEN GUNMAN IN BROOKLYN CHASE

A shooting in Montreal left one person dead Monday, as well as a police officer, authorities said.  (Getty Images)

Advertisement

At a news conference, Montreal police (Service de police de la Ville de Montréal) Chief Fady Dagher said officers were called to the Hilton Garden Inn where someone opened fire on them, he said. 

A male officer and a civilian died, he said. A female officer was injured and taken to a hospital in critical condition but was upgraded to stable condition. 

«It’s a tragedy. It’s a nightmare,» Dagher said. 

Advertisement

The weapon used in the shooting was recovered, the chief said. 

In an alert, issued around 12:30 p.m., authorities advised people in the Côte-des-Neiges area to shelter indoors because of an «armed and dangerous suspect» in the neighborhood. 

«If you are in the affected area, shelter indoors, lock the doors, stay away from windows and follow instructions of local authorities,» the alert stated. 

Advertisement

Montreal Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada reacted to the shooting online. 

TRANSGENDER STUDENT IDENTIFIED AS ALLEGED SUSPECT IN CANADA SCHOOL MASS SHOOTING THAT LEFT AT LEAST 9 DEAD

Montreal Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada

Montreal Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada leaves a caucus meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. (Reuters)

«My deepest condolences to the family, loved ones, and colleagues of the police officer who died in the line of duty in Côte-des-Neiges,» she wrote. «My thoughts are also with all those affected by this tragedy. We are closely following the evolution of the situation and ask the public to respect the instructions of the SPVM.»

Advertisement

In a post on X, Quebec Premier Christine Fréchette said she was «deeply shaken» by the shooting and that the provincial government would offer its full co-operation to the relevant authorities. 

«Such acts have no place here. We are monitoring the situation closely,» Fréchette said. 

Details about the alleged gunman or what led to the shooting have not been disclosed. 

Advertisement

It has been 24 years since the last (SPVM) officer was killed in the line of duty, Dagher said.

Brandon Elkaim, who lives near where the shooting happened, said he was shocked to learn of the violence in the area. 

Skyline of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

A shooting in Montreal, Quebec, Canada left a police officer dead, as well as one other person, authorities said Monday.  (Photographer: Nasuna Stuart-Ulin/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«It was about 10 or 12, what we now know, were shots in a row,» he told CTV News. «About 10 minutes went by of quiet but in that time, we saw the park completely empty out, parents and kids running in a panic.»

As of Monday afternoon, there was no immediate threat to the public, authorities said. 



crime, canada, police and law enforcement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

«El mundo está seguro»: cómo Andy Burnham heredó el poder en el Reino Unido en solo veinte minutos

Published

on


El régimen de transferencia de liderazgo en el sistema político británico es brutal: «a rey muerto, rey puesto».

El primer ministro laborista y exprocurador de la Corona, Sir Keir Starmer, renunció a su cargo este lunes ante la aclamación de 100 diputados de su partido para que lo hiciera. Andy Burnham, actual diputado y alcalde de Manchester, anunció su candidatura para reemplazarlo veinte minutos después.

Advertisement

El ascenso de Andy Burnham

Andy Burnham, que ganó su cargo de diputado en Makerfield días atrás, tomó un tren de Manchester a Londres junto a Frankie, su esposa holandesa, con una pequeña valija. Una nueva vida se iniciaba para ellos.

Se cambió la remera negra por un traje azul en el tren, se tomó un democrático taxi negro desde la estación de Euston y llegó a la Cámara de los Comunes, junto a su esposa y su hija, para jurar como diputado.

Advertisement

Una ovación recibió al nuevo diputado en un clima de alegría entre los legisladores. «¡El mundo está seguro!», gritó un diputado entre las risas de todos. Andy Burnham está familiarizado con la Cámara de los Comunes: ya había sido legislador antes. Cuando firmó, dijo, ante la risa general: «Un chico travieso». Juró por el rey y sus herederos.

Más que un desafío parlamentario, probablemente Burnham llegue a 10 Downing Street por «coronación» de sus pares y sin votación. En un mes podría ser el nuevo primer ministro británico, o seguro antes de septiembre. No va a tener contrincante.

Streeting renunció a desafiarlo

Advertisement

Wes Streeting, que renunció como secretario de Salud de Starmer, apoya a Burnham para líder laborista. Confirmó que no se presentará contra Burnham para el liderazgo del partido, a pesar de haber declarado previamente que se postularía como candidato en cualquier contienda.

Esto significa que Burnham probablemente tendrá vía libre para alcanzar el liderazgo sin contienda.

Andy Burnham toma una selfie junto a sus pares en el Parlamento. Foto: AP

«Andy ha demostrado lo que el Partido Laborista puede ser cuando somos inclusivos, estamos unidos y conectados con la vida de las personas a las que este partido se fundó para representar», dijo Streeting.

Diplomacia interpares

Advertisement

La pelea de Burnham para llegar a Downing Street fue sin cuartel. Uno a uno, los diputados y hasta los ministros le pedían a Starmer que se fuera. Hasta se lo dijo su canciller, Yvette Cooper. Pero después llegó esa diplomacia tan británica de las peores horas.

«Keir ha prestado un enorme servicio a nuestro país y quiero agradecerle su liderazgo y dedicación durante este período tan difícil. Su decisión marca el inicio de una transición, y es importante que este proceso se lleve a cabo de forma ordenada y responsable. Me presentaré como candidato para este proceso», confirmó Andy Burnham a la hora de la despedida.

¿Un liderazgo de izquierda?

Advertisement

Burnham declaró que las prioridades del Partido Laborista deberían ser «el progreso en el crecimiento económico, el costo de vida, los servicios públicos, la vivienda y las oportunidades para la próxima generación».

La gente reacciona al ver llegar al nuevo diputado Andy Burnham, en Westminster. Foto: Reuters

El Partido Laborista está preocupado por el avance de la ultraderecha en el reino, por Reform y Nigel Farage.

Las posiciones que Sir Keir Starmer, un exprocurador de la Corona que llegó a la política a los 50 años, adoptaba eran tibias, sin rumbo. Con muchos errores, incluida la nominación del exembajador en Estados Unidos, Peter Mandelson, y su detención posterior por la policía por el caso Epstein, que no contribuían a encontrar una línea firme. El costo de vida se volvió imposible y el populismo de Farage crece y se vuelve un peligro si hay elecciones generales anticipadas.

Por eso, los laboristas y los diputados buscan un liderazgo de izquierda, que creen haber encontrado en Andy Burnham. Pero los que lo conocen a este exministro de Salud blairista, graduado en Cambridge y católico, saben que es un moderado. Un pragmático socialdemócrata, más blairista que cercano a las ideas del «muro rojo» laborista, que en el norte del reino votó a favor del Brexit y con los conservadores. Pero es popular, muy político y tiene años de terreno en campaña.

Advertisement

Starmer, muy emocionado

La despedida de Sir Keir Starmer fue breve, emotiva y dolorosa. En un podio frente a la puerta negra de 10 Downing Street, muy emocionado, sintetizó su trabajo y agradeció, con lágrimas en los ojos, a Victoria, su esposa, y a sus hijos. Con todos ellos, en familia, tomó la decisión, el domingo, de renunciar en Chequers, la casa de campo oficial.

Keir Starmer se abraza a su esposa Victoria. Foto: AP

«La pregunta que se plantea ahora mi partido es si soy la persona idónea para liderarlos en las próximas elecciones generales. He escuchado la respuesta de mi grupo parlamentario a esa pregunta y la acepto con humildad», dijo.

«Cada decisión que he tomado ha tenido como prioridad el bienestar del país que amo. Por eso, renunciaré a mi cargo como líder del Partido Laborista«, dijo frente a un podio. «Esta mañana hablé con Su Majestad el Rey para informarle de mi decisión», añadió.

Advertisement

Aseguró que esto garantizará que haya un nuevo líder laborista para cuando el Parlamento reanude sus sesiones en septiembre.

La primera parte del discurso, en la que Starmer expuso sus logros durante su mandato, quedó casi ahogada por la Oda a la Alegría, que sonaba a todo volumen desde el enorme altavoz, propiedad del activista Steve Bray.

Pero, de repente, se hizo el silencio. Starmer expuso sus planes de dimisión y se emocionó al agradecer a sus colegas, y también a Victoria, su esposa, y a sus dos hijos adolescentes.

Advertisement
Keir Starmer y su esposa regresan al interior de Downing St. tras anunciar la renuncia. Foto: AP

Hasta el presidente Donald Trump anunció anoche que Sir Keir Starmer renunciaría hoy. Habían tenido horrendas relaciones porque Starmer, abogado al fin, se negaba a participar en una guerra ilegal como la de Irán o a dejar usar sus bases a los aviones norteamericanos o a ayudar a abrir el estrecho de Ormuz.

Nunca le había pasado a un presidente norteamericano tal situación, cuando el país tiene una relación transatlántica privilegiada con el reino. Ni la visita del rey Carlos a la Casa Blanca pudo reparar el vínculo entre Trump y Starmer.

Reacciones

Las primeras reacciones por la renuncia de Starmer ya se conocen. David Lammy, su ex canciller y secretario de Estado de Justicia, afirmó que el líder laborista se ha guiado por un profundo sentido del servicio público y del deber hacia este país.

Advertisement

«Conozco a Keir desde que era abogado. Era un hombre de principios entonces, igual que lo es ahora», dijo el viceprimer ministro.

Starmer «devolvió la estabilidad a nuestra economía», «redujo las listas de espera del NHS» y «volvió a colocar a Gran Bretaña en el centro de Europa», dijo Lammy, que también fue su canciller.

«Cambio prometido, cambio luchado y cambio logrado. Ese es el legado de Keir Starmer, y me siento increíblemente orgulloso de haber contribuido», escribió en X.

Advertisement

El secretario jefe de Starmer, Darren Jones, afirmó sentirse «orgulloso» de estar a su lado en Downing Street. Jones declaró que Starmer rescató al Partido Laborista «del borde del abismo y lo llevó al gobierno hace dos años». Advirtió que «no debe olvidar las lecciones de nuestras sucesivas derrotas».

«Pase lo que pase, podemos estar agradecidos por el liderazgo de Keir Starmer y el trabajo que su gobierno ha realizado para encaminar a Gran Bretaña hacia un futuro mejor», concluyó.

Lucy Powell, la vicepresidenta del Partido Laborista, afirmó que su partido le debe «muchísimo» a Sir Keir Starmer tras su anuncio de renuncia como líder laborista y primer ministro.

Advertisement

Starmer «nos devolvió la posibilidad de ser elegidos y nos llevó a una victoria electoral aplastante hace tan solo dos años». «Ha supervisado importantes logros desde entonces», dijo. Starmer «ama a su país» y tiene un «profundo sentido del servicio público y del deber».

Powell añadió que Starmer «anunció su dimisión con dignidad». Instó a su partido a «unirse» y «demostrar al país que podemos llevar a cabo una transición ordenada y exitosa».

«Debemos demostrar que la política progresista tradicional puede mejorar la vida de las personas y está a la altura de los desafíos que todos enfrentamos. Si fracasamos, las consecuencias para la democracia y el país serán graves y peligrosas», anunció Lady Powell.

Advertisement

La reacción de Nigel Farage

El líder del populista Partido Reformista del Reino Unido, Nigel Farage, afirmó que Sir Keir Starmer ha «fracasado» como primer ministro.

Dijo que la ciudadanía estará «molesta porque la mayoría de las medidas adoptadas por este gobierno laborista ni siquiera figuraban en su programa electoral de 2024».

Advertisement

Sin embargo, Farage expresa cierta comprensión hacia Starmer, afirmando que, «a nivel humano», lo lamentaba. «Se le veía claramente muy emocionado al final», comentó. «¿Y a quién le sorprende? Porque debe ser el trabajo más absorbente del mundo«.

Consideró «terrible» que el «momento histórico» de la dimisión de Starmer se viera empañado por manifestantes que ponían música a todo volumen frente a Downing Street.

El líder del Partido Reformista también instó a Andy Burnham, si llega a ser primer ministro, a convocar elecciones generales, dado que Burnham «ni siquiera se presentó a las elecciones anteriores».

Advertisement

La herencia

La canciller de las Finanzas de Starmer, Rachel Reeves, afirmó que «queda mucho por hacer», tras el anuncio de la dimisión de Sir Keir Starmer, dando a entender que desea que sus planes económicos continúen bajo un nuevo líder laborista. Se desconoce si Reeves permanecerá en el cargo de ministra de Hacienda.

«Hemos logrado mucho juntos. Hay mucho de qué enorgullecerse, y aún queda mucho por hacer. Agradezco el liderazgo de Keir y el trabajo que ha realizado para construir una Gran Bretaña más fuerte y segura», afirmó la canciller.

Advertisement

Elogiando al actual primer ministro, declaró: «Tras la peor derrota de la historia moderna de nuestro partido, Keir Starmer logró darle la vuelta a la situación y conseguir una aplastante mayoría tan solo cuatro años después».

Sir Keir Starmer, abogado de derechos humanos, millonario, ético, casi solemne, no brindó al laborismo los cambios en los que él no creía, cuando la ultraderecha apremia en Gran Bretaña.

Consiguió muchos cambios, pero no fue el cambio que su partido deseaba, ni tampoco el Partido Laborista renovado que se le prometió al público hace dos años.

Advertisement

Construyó un gobierno laborista moderado, cuyos logros fueron más modestos de lo que podrían haber sido, debido a que el primer ministro fue incapaz, y en ocasiones reacio, a imponer su voluntad, resolver disputas, tomar una postura y lograr resultados. Más que como un premier, siempre se comportó como un ecuánime procurador de la Corona.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Obama-era inspection flaws in Iran could persist as experts warn of nuclear blind spots

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran has agreed to let nuclear inspectors back into the country, Vice President JD Vance said Monday, as nuclear experts warned President Donald Trump’s new Tehran framework will only work if inspectors get the kind of unfettered access they say was missing from the Obama-era Iran deal.

Advertisement

The news, which Vance described as «a major milestone,» comes as Trump’s new Iran framework drew warnings from nuclear experts who told Fox News Digital the deal could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first locate, secure and verify the material. The IAEA has not been able to resume full in-field verification of Iran’s declared nuclear program since last year’s strikes, apart from a June inspection at a single Iranian nuclear power plant.

The verification gap concern centers on language in the reported U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding (MOU) saying the two sides will resolve the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile through a still-to-be-negotiated process. The MOU identifies onsite «downblending,» which means diluting enriched uranium so it is less usable for a nuclear weapon, under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supervision as the minimum acceptable method for dealing with the material. The MOU does not explicitly say Iran will retain a civilian nuclear program, but it says the two sides will discuss enrichment and other matters related to Iran’s «nuclear needs» in a final deal.

«Unfettered verification is everything,» Chuck DeVore, Chief National Initiatives Officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, told Fox News Digital. «There can be no denial for teams to inspect on the ground. Remote, technological means can achieve a lot, but nothing beats in-person inspections.»

Advertisement

TRUMP NUCLEAR TALKS FACE DEFINING QUESTION: WHAT HAPPENS TO IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE?

Vice President JD Vance said the Iranians have agreed to let nuclear inspectors back into their country. U.S. nuclear experts are warning that Trump’s reported Iran framework could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first fully account for and secure the material. (Photo by Spencer Platt / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

IAEA supervision would only be meaningful if inspectors first regain enough access to fully account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and ensure Tehran does not retain unchecked control of the material, experts warned Fox News Digital. Meanwhile, a recent IAEA report released this month underscored the agency’s limited visibility into Iran’s declared nuclear program after last year’s military strikes, saying that aside from a single inspection at an Iranian nuclear power plant, the agency «has not received information from Iran» about the status of its other declared nuclear facilities or associated nuclear material. «Nor has the Agency had access» to those sites for in-field verification, the report noted.

Advertisement

A senior administration official told Fox News Digital on background that the MOU required Iran’s regime to reaffirm that it will not procure or develop nuclear weapons, calling that a critical first step under Iran’s new Supreme Leader.

The official said the U.S. has reached understandings with Iran when it comes to its uranium stockpile, and the new deal is the first step of turning these understandings into real results, which include progress on enriched uranium stockpiles, dismantlement of nuclear sites, an enrichment ban and inspection access. The official added that the U.S. has already had productive discussions with Iran on those issues and, now that the MOU is formally in place, negotiators will work to make quick progress.

US-IRAN TALKS POSTPONED IN SWITZERLAND AMID ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH TENSIONS; HORMUZ REMAINS A KEY ISSUE

Advertisement

The official also referred Fox News Digital to comments Vice President JD Vance made Thursday, when he said the deal’s benefits depend on Iran following through on its promises.

«They have promised not to enrich. They have promised that they would allow inspectors in to destroy that highly enriched stockpile. And then, of course, it’s not usable anymore. You take it somewhere else,» Vance said. «They promised a number of things, and that’s why the deal contemplates a number of benefits if they do those things. But it doesn’t do anything if they don’t actually meet those promises.»

Vice President JD Vance listens during press briefing

Vice President JD Vance listens as a reporter asks a question in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Thursday, June 18, 2026, in Washington. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

«The Iranians have agreed to invite IAEA inspectors back into their country. That is a major milestone for the American people, and the first step in permanently denuclearize, easing or permanently ending a nuclear weapons program in Iran,» Vance added Monday after negotiations in Switzerland resumed. «And that’s exactly what we wanted to do. That’s exactly what we asked to happen.»

Advertisement

The Vice President said that the technical negotiations will continue over the next weeks and days, even in his absence. He said a framework for «proper political oversight» of these negotiations has been established as well. Vance simultaneously highlighted that «a lot of great progress on other nuclear talks» has already been made in the early days. 

Andrea Stricker, deputy director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Nonproliferation Program, told Fox News Digital that any credible agreement must begin with recovering and safeguarding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, and not allowing Tehran to keep control of the material while it is diluted inside the country.

«Without verifiably dismantling and destroying all of Iran’s fundamental nuclear capabilities — nuclear material, facilities, centrifuges, manufacturing capabilities, equipment, documentation, and weaponization capacities, and ensuring scientists are redirected to civilian work — Iran’s pledge on paper is meaningless,» she told Fox News Digital, noting that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile could, if recovered and further enriched, provide enough weapons-grade material for roughly 22 nuclear weapons.

Advertisement

HOW DOES TRUMP SOLVE KEY ‘NUCLEAR DUST’ HANG-UP IN NEGOTIATIONS TO END IRAN WAR?

DeVore was more cautious about assigning a single number to Iran’s potential weapons capacity, saying the estimate depends heavily on the sophistication of the weapon design. He said the same stockpile could translate into fewer basic weapons or be stretched further by a more advanced nuclear program.

He said onsite downblending, if properly verified, would be aimed at making Iran’s roughly 1,000 pounds of 60% enriched uranium unavailable for further enrichment. DeVore cautioned that the material would still need additional processing to be turned into weapons-grade uranium and said he does not believe Tehran can currently do that because key facilities were destroyed in last year’s strikes.

Advertisement
Satellite image showing damage at the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran

A satellite image shows damage at the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran after U.S. strikes on June 22, 2025. (Maxar Technologies)

Asked what would be needed to make any Iran deal enforceable, DeVore told Fox News Digital the U.S. must avoid repeating what he described as a key weakness of the Obama-era nuclear deal: allowing Tehran to restrict access or keep certain sites off limits. He said the «ultimate question» is onsite verification, warning that Washington cannot allow itself to be pushed into «an agreement for agreement’s sake.»

TOP SENATE REPUBLICAN RIPS INTO TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL, SAYS $300B MAKES OBAMA DEAL LOOK LIKE ‘A PITTANCE’

DeVore also said the Obama-era JCPOA gave inspectors too much notice and too little freedom to inspect suspicious locations as well, arguing that any new deal must avoid a system where Iran can delay, limit or steer inspections before the IAEA gets on the ground.

Advertisement
The flag of Iran waving in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency building in Vienna

The flag of Iran waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency headquarters in Vienna, Austria. (Florian Schroetter/AP Photo)

DeVore told Fox News Digital that his concern is informed by his experience as a young special assistant for foreign affairs in the Reagan administration, when he worked on verification issues surrounding Cold War-era nuclear agreements with the Soviet Union, including the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty and the Threshold Test Ban Treaty.

In those negotiations, DeVore said, the danger was that the minimum level of verification sought by defense and intelligence officials could become the starting point for diplomats, meaning the final deal could end up below what experts believed was necessary.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Once you say, ‘This is the minimum we need,’ then that becomes the starting point, so anything agreed to is less than that,» DeVore said. «That’s what I fear.»

Fox News Digital reached out to the IAEA asking whether the agency can currently account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and whether it has any comment on the verification questions raised by the reported framework but did not hear back. The agency did not release any statement after Vance said they would be allowed access to Iran in time for publication.

war with iran, nuclear proliferation, foreign policy, middle east foreign policy, treaties, sanctions

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias