Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

US economic chokehold on Iran reaches peak leverage as collapse risks emerge

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

U.S. economic pressure on Iran has reached one of its most powerful points in decades, but inconsistent enforcement has prevented sanctions from achieving their full impact, according to a former Treasury sanctions expert.

Advertisement

Miad Maleki, who played a central role in Treasury Department sanctions campaigns against Iran and its network of proxy groups, said in an on-camera interview the current moment reflects a rare convergence of economic, political and diplomatic leverage against Tehran.

«We’ve never had the level of leverage that we have today with Iran in the history of our conflict … since 1979,» Maleki said. 

His assessment comes as President Donald Trump signaled escalating pressure Thursday, writing on Truth Social that the United States has «total control over the Strait of Hormuz» and that it is effectively «sealed up tight» until Iran agrees to a deal.

Advertisement

IRAN PRESIDENT VOWS DEFIANCE AS PROTESTS BUILD AGAINST REGIME AMID US MILITARY BUILD UP

Maleki argues the current moment marks a turning point because multiple pressure tools — sanctions, a U.S. naval blockade, and tighter enforcement — are being applied simultaneously for the first time in years. Unlike previous cycles, he said, the strategy is now directly targeting Iran’s oil exports and the networks that help move them, raising the risk of a rapid economic squeeze.

He said Iran may run out of oil storage in as little as two to three weeks, forcing production cuts, while gasoline shortages could hit on a similar timeline due to heavy reliance on imports. Combined with an estimated $435 million in daily economic losses, the pressure could spill into the financial system, leaving the regime struggling to pay salaries and raising the risk of renewed unrest.

Advertisement

An oil tanker is seen near the terminal at Kharg Island, Iran, as U.S. officials and analysts consider whether seizing the island could significantly impact Iran’s oil exports. (Ali Mohammadi/Bloomberg)

Maleki said the real leverage lies in sustained economic pressure and enforcement.

At the core of that pressure is an Iranian economy he describes as «on the verge of collapse,» driven by years of sanctions and compounded by recent disruptions.

Advertisement

He pointed to triple-digit food inflation, a sharply devalued currency and a roughly 90% collapse in purchasing power, along with potential long-term oil revenue losses of up to $14 billion annually.

Maleki, who is currently a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, estimated that current conditions are costing Iran «about $435 million a day in combined economic damage … with the blockade and closure of the Strait of Hormuz.»

A key driver of that pressure is the Strait of Hormuz, long viewed as one of Iran’s primary tools of leverage in global energy markets. Maleki said the dynamic has shifted.

Advertisement

IRAN IS ‘TRYING TO GIVE THE GLOBAL ECONOMY A HEART ATTACK’ BY CLOSING STRAIT OF HORMUZ, UAE MINISTER SAYS

oil hub at Kharg Island

Former President Donald Trump weighs a potential attack on Iran’s oil hub at Kharg Island amid expert predictions of market chaos. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

«Iran’s economy relies on the Strait of Hormuz more than any other economy,» he said, calling its closure a form of «economic self-sabotage.»

While countries in Asia — including Japan, South Korea, India and China — are most exposed to disruptions, many have built up reserves. «Japan’s oil reserve is pretty significant. Same with China,» Maleki said.

Advertisement

Still, the region remains heavily dependent on the waterway, with roughly 75% of liquefied natural gas supplies for countries including India, China and South Korea flowing through the strait.

Inside Iran, however, vulnerabilities are more immediate. Despite vast oil reserves, the country imports between 30 million to 60 million liters of gasoline per day to cover a domestic shortfall of up to 35 million liters.

«If they run out of gasoline… they’re going to have a major crisis domestically,» Maleki said, noting that past shortages and price hikes have triggered widespread protests.

Advertisement

NUCLEAR EXPERTS WARN IRAN’S URANIUM ‘RIGHT’ IS A MYTH, SAY TRUMP IS RIGHT TO HOLD FIRM

The economic pressure is being reinforced by a U.S. naval blockade targeting Iran’s oil exports, the regime’s primary source of revenue.

A billboard showing a portrait of the late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei looming over an empty square.

A billboard showing a portrait of the late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in U.S.-Israeli strikes, looms over an empty square in Tehran, Iran, Thursday, March 5, 2026. (Vahid Salemi/AP Photo)

A senior administration official said the Treasury Department is intensifying enforcement under what it describes as an «Economic Fury» campaign, using financial and maritime tools in tandem to squeeze Iran’s revenue streams.

Advertisement

The official said the strategy focuses on «systematically degrading Iran’s ability to generate, move, and repatriate funds,» including by constraining maritime trade through the naval blockade, which targets Iran’s primary source of revenue from oil exports.

Financial pressure is also expanding globally. The official said Treasury has warned banks in China, Hong Kong, the United Arab Emirates and Oman that facilitating Iranian trade could expose them to secondary sanctions, signaling a more aggressive approach to enforcement beyond Iran’s borders.

Treasury has issued sanctions on more than 1,000 targets since 2025 under the current maximum pressure campaign, the official said, aimed at disrupting Iran’s oil trade and financial networks.

Advertisement

The official added that Iran is facing immediate logistical constraints, warning that storage capacity at Kharg Island — the country’s main oil export terminal — could be filled within days if exports remain blocked, potentially forcing production shut-ins.

«Treasury will continue to freeze the funds stolen by the corrupt leadership on behalf of the people of Iran,» the official warned.

A new analysis from United Against Nuclear Iran said the blockade is already deterring high-value shipments, even as some Iran-linked vessels continue to transit the region.

Advertisement

TRUMP CLAIMS IRAN ‘STARVING FOR CASH,’ ‘COLLAPSING FINANCIALLY’ AFTER EXTENDING CEASEFIRE

Two oil tankers seized in the Strait of Hormuz

Iran seized two oil tankers Thursday while former Iranian minister Ezzatollah Zarghami threatened to make the Strait of Hormuz a «massacre and hell» for U.S. forces. (Giuseppe Cacace/AFP)

«Effectiveness should not be measured by the total number of Iran-linked vessels at sea,» the group said in an April 22 statement. «But by whether the U.S. is disrupting high-value Iranian oil exports… and deterring large-scale illicit shipments.»

At least 29 vessels have been turned around or forced back to port, including several very large crude carriers, according to the report.

Advertisement

The blockade, announced April 12 and enforced by U.S. Central Command, is designed to cut off Iranian crude exports, particularly shipments to China, while prioritizing high-impact targets.

While sanctions are clearly biting, Maleki said their impact has been limited by inconsistent enforcement across successive U.S. administrations.

U.S. sanctions on Iran have been in place in various forms for years, targeting the country’s oil exports, banking sector and access to global financial systems.

Advertisement

Under the Obama administration, sanctions pressure was partially lifted under the nuclear deal. The first Trump administration reimposed «maximum pressure,» but enforcement ramped up gradually and lasted only a limited period. The Biden administration later eased enforcement in pursuit of diplomacy.

He argued that cycles of tightening and relief — including sanctions rollback under the Iran nuclear deal and pauses in enforcement — have allowed Tehran to adapt.

«What’s different now,» Maleki said, is the combination of sustained sanctions with real-time enforcement measures that directly restrict Iran’s ability to export oil — a step that was largely absent in earlier phases.

Advertisement

To maximize pressure, Maleki said Washington must sustain enforcement, particularly through secondary sanctions targeting foreign banks and companies facilitating Iranian trade.

Crucially, he downplayed the likelihood that outside powers could offset the pressure.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
Anti-regime protesters marching in the streets of Tehran

Anti-regime protests engulf the streets of Tehran, Iran, on Jan. 6, 2025. (Reuters)

«I can’t really point to any other nation… that is going to jump in and give the Iranian regime a lifeline,» he said.

«At some point in the next few weeks to a few months, they’re going to face not just gasoline shortages and oil production disruptions, but also a major banking problem to pay salaries of government employees and IRGC personnel,» he said. «Iranians run out of patience again, as they did before, and they’re back on the street. I’m not quite sure if you’re going to have unpaid IRGC forces willing to go back on the street and kill their fellow Iranians who have the same grievances that they have now, which is a collapsed economy.»

Advertisement



war with iran, inflation, economy, enforcement, iran, sanctions

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Democrats split over Tlaib’s Lebanon measure as Republicans seize on Hezbollah omission

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democrats splintered over a resolution seeking to block the U.S. from assisting Israel’s war against Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed terrorist group, on Thursday. 

Advertisement

The measure, offered by progressive Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., would require President Donald Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from Lebanon. For months, Israel and Hezbollah, a U.S.-designated terrorist group and Iranian proxy, have been at war in southern Lebanon, but the United States has not joined the conflict.

A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., rejected the measure. Critics argued the resolution could aid Hezbollah and potentially hamstring U.S. military operations in the country. 

Tlaib’s resolution failed 92-324, with more than half of House Democrats joining nearly all Republicans to vote it down.

Advertisement

The Lebanon war powers resolution divided Democrats, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., joining Republicans in rejecting the measure. (Aaron Schwartz/Bloomberg)

REP RASHIDA TLAIB MOVES TO BLOCK US OPERATIONS IN LEBANON BUT IGNORES HEZBOLLAH

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., an Israel critic, was the lone Republican to support Tlaib’s measure. Meanwhile, Reps. Derek Tran, D-Calif., and Betty McCollum, D-Minn., voted present.

Advertisement

House Democratic leaders said shortly before the vote they would oppose Tlaib’s resolution and work with the progressive lawmaker on a narrower measure exempting some U.S. military operations in the country. Their statement also denounced Hezbollah as a «violent terrorist organization» and a «sworn enemy of the United States.»

Tlaib, who has accused Israel of committing «ethnic cleansing» in Lebanon, did not mention Hezbollah in her resolution. She and other proponents of the measure also avoided discussing the Iranian proxy force during heated floor debate over the measure. 

Republicans highlighted the omission and accused the legislation’s supporters of serving as «proxies for Hezbollah.»

Advertisement

«Apparently they don’t want to see Israel killing Hezbollah, even though it’s Hezbollah that is killing Israeli children, Israeli adults, Israeli elders,» House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast, R-Fla., said Wednesday, referring to his Democratic colleagues.

Tlaib asserted that her resolution would only affect U.S. forces actively engaged in hostilities. Republicans, however, disputed that claim and suggested it would hurt U.S. efforts to counter Hezbollah. 

«It doesn’t say anything about [whether] you can keep the Marines that are in the embassy,» Mast said, referring to the U.S. embassy in Beirut. «That’s a pretty big oversight. It doesn’t say anything about whether we can keep United States armed forces that are training missions with the LAF [Lebanese Armed Forces]. Again, pretty big oversight.»

Advertisement
Rep. Rashida Tlaib speaking during House Financial Services Committee hearing in Washington DC

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat from Michigan, attempted to bar U.S. forces from joining Israel’s war in Lebanon. (Tierney L. Cross/Bloomberg)

RASHIDA TLAIB HIT WITH HOUSE CENSURE THREAT, ACCUSED OF ‘CELEBRATING TERRORISM’ IN PRO-PALESTINIAN SPEECH

The debate turned personal when Rep. Max Miller, R-Ohio, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, linked Tlaib to Hezbollah.

«Hezbollah is a terrorist organization … and its members are butchers that you like to hang out with to a certain extent,» the Ohio lawmaker said, referring to Tlaib.

Advertisement

A shouting match between the two then broke out, with Tlaib demanding that Miller’s remarks be stricken from the record.

The presiding chair ultimately complied with her request, but Miller doubled down on his remarks.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«Yes, I said it. I own it, and I stand by it,» Mast said on behalf of Miller on the floor.

Tlaib’s failed war powers resolution comes as Iran has sought to tie Israel’s invasion of Lebanon to its ceasefire negotiations with the United States.

Hezbollah, which has long helped Iran project power in the region, rejected a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon’s government Thursday.

Advertisement

politics, lebanon, democrats, republicans, israel, rashida tlaib

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

As Hezbollah rejects truce, families on Israel’s northern border describe life under fire

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Two days after another ceasefire was announced between Israel and U.S. terrorist designated group Hezbollah, Yulia Bar-Dan was standing outside her temporary home in Kibbutz Manara in northern Israel when the familiar sound of an interceptor echoed overhead. 

Advertisement

«There will probably be another siren soon,» she told Fox News Digital.

Minutes later, an alert appeared on her phone warning residents in northern Israel to take shelter.

For Bar-Dan, the scene captured the reality of life on Israel’s northern border nearly two years after Hezbollah joined the war against Israel on Oct. 8, 2023. 

Advertisement

After Hezbollah entered the recent war in support of Iran, Washington launched a diplomatic effort aimed at turning the ceasefire into a broader arrangement for Lebanon. 

ISRAEL OPENS FIRE IN LEBANON AT ‘SUSPECTS’ ALLEGEDLY VIOLATING TRUCE, WHICH HAS ENTERED ITS SECOND DAY

Multiple rounds of talks between Israeli and Lebanese officials have taken place in Washington, and President Donald Trump repeatedly has announced ceasefire understandings aimed at restoring calm along the border. Residents of communities like Manara, Israel, say the rockets, drones and uncertainty never really stopped.

Advertisement

An Israeli soldier stands near military vehicles on the second day of the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah near the Israel-Lebanon border on Nov. 28. (Stoyan Nenov/Reuters)

«A ceasefire is supposed to be on both sides,» she said. «Not that Hezbollah keeps shooting at us and we just keep absorbing it.»

When Fox News Digital first spoke to Bar-Dan in December 2024 during the war, she and her husband had fled Manara, Israel, with their three children and were living out of a single hotel room, unsure whether they would ever return home.

Advertisement

Today, roughly 200 of the kibbutz’s 280 residents have returned, Bar-Dan said. But many, including Bar-Dan’s family, still cannot live in their original homes because of war damage. 

Yulia Bar-Dan and her husband sitting together at Kibbutz Manara

Yulia Bar-Dan and her husband are pictured during quieter times at Kibbutz Manara, Israel.  (Yulia Bar-Dan)

Despite repeated ceasefire announcements, residents say normal life remains elusive.

«There hasn’t really been a routine or a quiet day since February,» she said.

Advertisement

Schools officially reopened in early June, but Bar-Dan decided not to send her children.

«They take the bus to school,» she said. «What if there’s a siren on the way? I can’t take that chance.»

ISRAEL DESTROYS HEZBOLLAH’S ‘LARGEST PRECISION-GUIDED MISSILES MANUFACTURING SITE’ AS GROUP VOWS TO ‘FIGHT’

Advertisement
Hezbollah terrorists holding rifles in a group

Hezbollah terrorists holding rifles are shown in this image.  (Fadel Itani/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Her frustration is not directed at Hezbollah alone.

Like many residents interviewed by Fox News Digital, Bar-Dan says there is a growing disconnect between the reality experienced on the border and the reality described by politicians.

«It doesn’t really matter where the decisions are being made,» she said. «The decisions just need to match reality. Right now there is a decision, but the reality is completely different.»

Advertisement

A year and a half after most of Manara’s residents were evacuated amid fears of a Hezbollah invasion, community leader Yochai Wolfin says residents have developed their own name for the current situation. 

«We call it ‘the ceasefire war,’» he said. 

The phrase has become common in the community.

Advertisement

First came a year and a half of evacuation. Then came the return home. Then came what Wolfin describes as three months of «fire within a ceasefire.»

The uncertainty has become part of daily life.

Children study inside shelters. Parts of the kibbutz still lack protected rooms. Construction projects remain unfinished because contractors are reluctant to work so close to the border. 

Advertisement

He said many residents increasingly feel that the decisions determining their future are being made far from the communities that bear the consequences.

ISRAEL WARNS IT WILL GO AFTER LEBANON DIRECTLY IF CEASE-FIRE WITH HEZBOLLAH COLLAPSES

Lebanese man holding Hezbollah flag near border with Israel in southern Lebanese village of Hula

A Lebanese man holds a Hezbollah flag near the border with Israel in the southern Lebanese village of Hula on Dec. 20, 2020. (Jalaa Marey/AFP)

«Who knows what tomorrow will bring?» Wolfin said. «We know who is calling the shots. We saw it a few days ago when Trump announced another ceasefire. But for us, the reality on the ground hasn’t changed.»

Advertisement

The comments come as Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem warned Thursday that northern Israel would remain unsafe as long as Israeli strikes continue in Lebanon, according to Reuters.

In a written statement broadcast on June 4, 2026, Qassem condemned the Washington-mediated framework as «absurd, humiliating, and insulting,» calling it a roadmap for surrender.

For residents of Israel’s northern border communities, the statements reinforced what many say they have been experiencing for months: a ceasefire that exists on paper but not in daily life.

Advertisement

Naor Shamia, who heads Manara’s emergency response team, says residents increasingly worry that temporary emergency measures are becoming permanent.

«The fear isn’t today,» he said. «The fear is that this becomes years. We are in a deadlock.»

Across the border region, similar concerns are heard.

Advertisement
Fire burning at Kibbutz Manara after an attack

Fire burns at Kibbutz Manara following another attack. (Kibbutz Manara)

In the community of Adamit, resident Yael Cohen-Arazi described the contrast between the beauty surrounding her and the reality of living under constant threat.

«Every morning I wake up and think I’m living in paradise,» she said in footage provided to Fox News Digital by the Israeli news agency TPS-IL. «Then there are the explosions that shake my soul.»

Her children, she said, have spent so much of their lives under fire that they no longer know what normal looks like.

Advertisement

«I tell them there are children who don’t live like this,» she said.

Back in Manara, Israel, another alert interrupted the afternoon.

Bar-Dan says she is not angry anymore. Mostly, she is tired and sad.

Advertisement

«I feel bad for the soldiers,» she said. «Every day there is another casualty, and there is still no solution.»

Yet she insists she is staying.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
Members of the Kibbutz Manara rapid response unit responding to rocket attacks

Members of the Kibbutz Manara rapid response unit respond to Hezbollah rocket attacks on Kibbutz Manara. (Kibbutz Manara)

«This is our home,» she said. «Someone has to live on the borders of this country.»

Then another explosion sounded in the distance.

Advertisement



israel, bombings, war with iran, conflicts, lebanon

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

En medio de la guerra, el presidente de la federación de fútbol iraní pelea para que su selección vaya al Mundial

Published

on


Los preparativos de Irán para la próxima Copa Mundial en Norteamérica se han desarrollado con el telón de fondo de la guerra, palabras beligerantes y continuas dudas de que la selección nacional reciba los visados a tiempo.

El malestar ya ha dado lugar a cumbres entre funcionarios iraníes y los máximos dirigentes del organismo rector del fútbol. En el centro de todo esto ha estado Mehdi Taj, quien durante muchos años ha sido presidente de la federación de fútbol de Irán.

Advertisement

En una inusual entrevista, Taj, antiguo comandante del Cuerpo de la Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica, dejó pocas dudas sobre a quién culpa de las complicaciones.

Mientras la selección nacional de Irán se preparaba para viajar a México en lugar de a Estados Unidos, un cambio de última hora que se produjo en medio de las continuas tensiones, Taj dijo que la decisión se había tomado con la FIFA para reducir al mínimo el tiempo del equipo en Estados Unidos, a quien culpa de toda la incertidumbre sobre la participación de Irán en la Copa Mundial.

Hablando por videollamada, Taj señaló que Irán había sido el tercer equipo en clasificarse para la que será la mayor Copa Mundial de la historia –que ocurrirá a lo largo de Estados Unidos, Canadá y México y en la que competirán 48 selecciones–, pero la primera en la que un anfitrión está en guerra con una de las naciones competidoras.

Advertisement

Esos preparativos, dijo, se han visto afectados de forma que han perjudicado a su equipo. Recientemente, la selección de fútbol de Irán cambió bruscamente su base para la Copa Mundial de Estados Unidos a Tijuana, tras las conversaciones mantenidas con la FIFA en Turquía, donde el equipo ha estado entrenando durante gran parte del mes pasado.

En declaraciones desde Teherán el martes, Taj expresó su profunda decepción por el hecho de que aún no se hubieran aprobado las solicitudes de visado para la selección, que está previsto que juegue tres partidos en la costa oeste estadounidense.

El equipo se ha estado preparando en un campamento en el suroeste de Turquía. La Copa Mundial comienza el 11 de junio, y el primer partido de Irán está previsto cuatro días después contra Nueva Zelanda en Los Ángeles. Irán tenía previsto concentrarse en Tucson, Arizona, antes de que la FIFA, el organismo que rige el fútbol mundial, anunciara que el equipo se instalaría en Tijuana, México, cerca de la frontera con Estados Unidos.

Advertisement

La presencia de Irán en el torneo en medio de su actual conflicto con Estados Unidos es una de las mayores crisis en los casi 100 años de historia de la Copa Mundial.

Leé también: La FIFA dio a conocer las listas de jugadores de las 48 selecciones del Mundial: los datos más curiosos

Una nación anfitriona, afirmó Taj, no debería tener autoridad para interrumpir los preparativos de los equipos clasificados. Desde que comenzó la guerra a finales de febrero, tanto funcionarios iraníes como estadounidenses, incluido el presidente Donald Trump e incluso Taj, han sembrado la incertidumbre con afirmaciones cambiantes.

Advertisement

Taj dijo que el asesinato del líder supremo de Irán al comienzo de la guerra y el bombardeo de una escuela en el que murieron más de cien niños habían creado una “nube de ambigüedad” sobre la participación de Irán. Pero dijo que, desde entonces, las autoridades iraníes habían mantenido conversaciones fructíferas con los dirigentes de la FIFA, incluido su presidente, Gianni Infantino, para sentar las bases de la participación del equipo.

Infantino, quien mantiene una relación cercana con Trump, viajó a Turquía en marzo para mostrar su apoyo al equipo iraní, y el mes pasado, el principal administrador de la FIFA, Mattias Grafström, también se reunió con funcionarios iraníes.

“Solo estamos en contacto con la FIFA, no con Estados Unidos, y no sabemos qué piensan”, dijo Taj.

Advertisement

Taj ha tenido dificultades para viajar en los últimos meses. Fue uno de los funcionarios a los que se negaron credenciales para el sorteo del torneo celebrado en Washington en diciembre. El mes pasado, las autoridades canadienses revocaron sus documentos cuando se dirigía a Vancouver vía Toronto para asistir a la reunión anual de la FIFA. Taj dijo que, tras varias horas de conversaciones con funcionarios canadienses, regresó a su país en señal de protesta con el resto de la delegación iraní.

Taj fue formalmente comandante del Cuerpo de la Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica, grupo que Estados Unidos y Canadá han designado entidad terrorista.

Dijo que él ya no tenía ninguna relación con el grupo, pero sostuvo que este contaba con un amplio apoyo en Irán para defender el país. En Canadá, dijo, él y otros miembros de la delegación iraní “pasaron el tiempo defendiendo el país” bajo el interrogatorio de funcionarios de fronteras en Toronto.

Advertisement

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, junto al presidente de la FIFA, Gianni Infantino, en la Oficina Oval de la Casa Blanca este 7 de marzo de 2025. (Foto: Jim Watson/AP, archivo)

El secretario de Estado Marco Rubio dijo en una reciente comparecencia en la Casa Blanca junto a Trump que no se permitiría la entrada en Estados Unidos de entrenadores y otros funcionarios vinculados a la Guardia Revolucionaria.

Varios jugadores de la lista de Irán, incluido su capitán, han cumplido el servicio militar obligatorio con el grupo, dijo Taj.

Advertisement

Los problemas con los visados antes del Mundial llevaron a los iraníes, dijo Taj, a “sospechar que era posible que Estados Unidos nos creara algunos problemas graves”.

El lunes, el equipo publicó su lista oficial en un video en las redes sociales, y tiene un partido más de preparación, contra Mali, antes de su partida prevista al campamento base de México. Sardar Azmoun, un jugador estrella que suscitó críticas por una publicación en las redes sociales después de la guerra y que algunos funcionarios tacharon de desleal, se quedó fuera de la lista.

Taj habló positivamente del cambio de última hora, afirmando que Tijuana ofrecía mejores condiciones que Tucson porque estaba más cerca de Los Ángeles, donde se jugarán dos de los partidos de Irán, y tiene mejor clima y conexiones de transporte más fáciles.

Advertisement

Fue menos comunicativo sobre cómo se produjo el cambio. La presidenta de México, Claudia Sheinbaum, dijo que la FIFA le había pedido ayuda a su país porque “Estados Unidos no quiere que la selección iraní se quede a pernoctar en Estados Unidos”.

Taj dijo que desconocía que Estados Unidos hubiera hecho tal petición. “Llegamos a la conclusión mutua con la FIFA de que queremos que nuestra presencia en Estados Unidos sea la mínima posible”, dijo.

Para la FIFA, la crisis requiere de cuidadosas maniobras: satisfacer a un país anfitrión expectante, tranquilizar a un equipo cualificado y mantener la neutralidad política. Esa neutralidad ya ha sido cuestionada debido a la cálida relación de Infantino con Trump.

Advertisement

Taj dijo que, según los principios de “Fair Play” (juego limpio) de la FIFA, todas las naciones clasificadas deben recibir el mismo trato y que proteger a ese principio de las interferencias políticas era responsabilidad de la FIFA, no de Irán.

La FIFA no respondió a la solicitud de comentarios.

Cuando se le preguntó si confiaba en que se celebraría el partido inaugural, Taj no ofreció garantías.

Advertisement

“Tendrías que preguntarle a la FIFA”, dijo.

*Por Tariq Panja

The New York Times, Irán, Mundial 2026

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias